Example of compact Riemannian manifold with only one geodesic. The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Why are we interested in closed geodesics?Existence of geodesic on a compact Riemannian manifoldCompleteness of a Riemannian manifold with boundaryTotally geodesic hypersurface in compact hyperbolic manifoldTriangle equality in a Riemannian manifold implies “geodesic colinearity”?Example for conjugate points with only one connecting geodesicExample for infinitely many points with more than one minimizing geodesic to a point?Examples of compact negatively curved constant curvature manifoldCompact totally geodesic submanifolds in manifold with positive sectional curvatureClosed geodesic on a non-simply connected Riemannian manifold

What was the last x86 CPU that did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in?

Why can I use a list index as an indexing variable in a for loop?

Identify 80s or 90s comics with ripped creatures (not dwarves)

Student Loan from years ago pops up and is taking my salary

Is there a writing software that you can sort scenes like slides in PowerPoint?

Can withdrawing asylum be illegal?

What other Star Trek series did the main TNG cast show up in?

Sub-subscripts in strings cause different spacings than subscripts

Can we generate random numbers using irrational numbers like π and e?

Define a list range inside a list

Why doesn't shell automatically fix "useless use of cat"?

Is it ok to offer lower paid work as a trial period before negotiating for a full-time job?

What's the point in a preamp?

For what reasons would an animal species NOT cross a *horizontal* land bridge?

Mortgage adviser recommends a longer term than necessary combined with overpayments

Did the UK government pay "millions and millions of dollars" to try to snag Julian Assange?

One-dimensional Japanese puzzle

Are spiders unable to hurt humans, especially very small spiders?

Word to describe a time interval

Am I ethically obligated to go into work on an off day if the reason is sudden?

What aspect of planet Earth must be changed to prevent the industrial revolution?

How many cones with angle theta can I pack into the unit sphere?

Do warforged have souls?

Is it ethical to upload a automatically generated paper to a non peer-reviewed site as part of a larger research?



Example of compact Riemannian manifold with only one geodesic.



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Why are we interested in closed geodesics?Existence of geodesic on a compact Riemannian manifoldCompleteness of a Riemannian manifold with boundaryTotally geodesic hypersurface in compact hyperbolic manifoldTriangle equality in a Riemannian manifold implies “geodesic colinearity”?Example for conjugate points with only one connecting geodesicExample for infinitely many points with more than one minimizing geodesic to a point?Examples of compact negatively curved constant curvature manifoldCompact totally geodesic submanifolds in manifold with positive sectional curvatureClosed geodesic on a non-simply connected Riemannian manifold










2












$begingroup$


The Lyusternik-Fet theorem states that every compact Riemannian manifold has at least one closed geodesic.



Are there any easy-to-construct1 examples of compact Riemannian manifolds for which it is easy to see they only have one closed geodesic?2



If there aren't any such examples, are there any easy-to-construct examples that only have one closed geodesic but where proving this might be difficult?



And if there aren't any examples of this, are there any examples at all of compact manifolds with only one closed geodesic?




1 Of course, the $1$-sphere $S^1$ contains just one closed geodesic, but I'm interested in examples besides this one.



2 By the theorem of the three geodesics, this example cannot be a topological sphere.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    2












    $begingroup$


    The Lyusternik-Fet theorem states that every compact Riemannian manifold has at least one closed geodesic.



    Are there any easy-to-construct1 examples of compact Riemannian manifolds for which it is easy to see they only have one closed geodesic?2



    If there aren't any such examples, are there any easy-to-construct examples that only have one closed geodesic but where proving this might be difficult?



    And if there aren't any examples of this, are there any examples at all of compact manifolds with only one closed geodesic?




    1 Of course, the $1$-sphere $S^1$ contains just one closed geodesic, but I'm interested in examples besides this one.



    2 By the theorem of the three geodesics, this example cannot be a topological sphere.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      The Lyusternik-Fet theorem states that every compact Riemannian manifold has at least one closed geodesic.



      Are there any easy-to-construct1 examples of compact Riemannian manifolds for which it is easy to see they only have one closed geodesic?2



      If there aren't any such examples, are there any easy-to-construct examples that only have one closed geodesic but where proving this might be difficult?



      And if there aren't any examples of this, are there any examples at all of compact manifolds with only one closed geodesic?




      1 Of course, the $1$-sphere $S^1$ contains just one closed geodesic, but I'm interested in examples besides this one.



      2 By the theorem of the three geodesics, this example cannot be a topological sphere.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      The Lyusternik-Fet theorem states that every compact Riemannian manifold has at least one closed geodesic.



      Are there any easy-to-construct1 examples of compact Riemannian manifolds for which it is easy to see they only have one closed geodesic?2



      If there aren't any such examples, are there any easy-to-construct examples that only have one closed geodesic but where proving this might be difficult?



      And if there aren't any examples of this, are there any examples at all of compact manifolds with only one closed geodesic?




      1 Of course, the $1$-sphere $S^1$ contains just one closed geodesic, but I'm interested in examples besides this one.



      2 By the theorem of the three geodesics, this example cannot be a topological sphere.







      differential-geometry examples-counterexamples geodesic






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 1 hour ago







      Peter Kagey

















      asked 1 hour ago









      Peter KageyPeter Kagey

      1,57072053




      1,57072053




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4












          $begingroup$

          First of all, you have to exclude constant maps $S^1to M$ from consideration: They are all closed geodesics. Secondly, you have to talk about geometrically distinct closed geodesics: Geodesics which have the same image are regarded as "the same". Then, it is a notorious conjecture/open problem:



          Conjecture. Every compact Riemannian manifold of dimension $n >1$ contains infinitely many geometrically distinct nonconstant geodesics.



          See for instance this survey article by Burns and Matveev.



          This is even unknown if $M$ is diffeomorphic to the sphere $S^n$, $nge 3$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$




















            2












            $begingroup$

            If you analyze the geodesics using Clairaut's relation, you'll find that the only closed geodesic on a hyperboloid of one sheet is the central circle. Indeed, the same holds for a concave surface of revolution of the same "shape" as the hyperboloid of one sheet.



            EDIT: Apologies for missing the crucial compactness hypothesis.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Lovely example, but a hyperboloid isn't compact, right?
              $endgroup$
              – Peter Kagey
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              Oops. Sloppy reading. I'll delete.
              $endgroup$
              – Ted Shifrin
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              It's a nice example; you should leave it.
              $endgroup$
              – Peter Kagey
              1 hour ago











            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3185649%2fexample-of-compact-riemannian-manifold-with-only-one-geodesic%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            4












            $begingroup$

            First of all, you have to exclude constant maps $S^1to M$ from consideration: They are all closed geodesics. Secondly, you have to talk about geometrically distinct closed geodesics: Geodesics which have the same image are regarded as "the same". Then, it is a notorious conjecture/open problem:



            Conjecture. Every compact Riemannian manifold of dimension $n >1$ contains infinitely many geometrically distinct nonconstant geodesics.



            See for instance this survey article by Burns and Matveev.



            This is even unknown if $M$ is diffeomorphic to the sphere $S^n$, $nge 3$.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$

















              4












              $begingroup$

              First of all, you have to exclude constant maps $S^1to M$ from consideration: They are all closed geodesics. Secondly, you have to talk about geometrically distinct closed geodesics: Geodesics which have the same image are regarded as "the same". Then, it is a notorious conjecture/open problem:



              Conjecture. Every compact Riemannian manifold of dimension $n >1$ contains infinitely many geometrically distinct nonconstant geodesics.



              See for instance this survey article by Burns and Matveev.



              This is even unknown if $M$ is diffeomorphic to the sphere $S^n$, $nge 3$.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$















                4












                4








                4





                $begingroup$

                First of all, you have to exclude constant maps $S^1to M$ from consideration: They are all closed geodesics. Secondly, you have to talk about geometrically distinct closed geodesics: Geodesics which have the same image are regarded as "the same". Then, it is a notorious conjecture/open problem:



                Conjecture. Every compact Riemannian manifold of dimension $n >1$ contains infinitely many geometrically distinct nonconstant geodesics.



                See for instance this survey article by Burns and Matveev.



                This is even unknown if $M$ is diffeomorphic to the sphere $S^n$, $nge 3$.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                First of all, you have to exclude constant maps $S^1to M$ from consideration: They are all closed geodesics. Secondly, you have to talk about geometrically distinct closed geodesics: Geodesics which have the same image are regarded as "the same". Then, it is a notorious conjecture/open problem:



                Conjecture. Every compact Riemannian manifold of dimension $n >1$ contains infinitely many geometrically distinct nonconstant geodesics.



                See for instance this survey article by Burns and Matveev.



                This is even unknown if $M$ is diffeomorphic to the sphere $S^n$, $nge 3$.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited 1 hour ago

























                answered 1 hour ago









                Moishe KohanMoishe Kohan

                48.6k344110




                48.6k344110





















                    2












                    $begingroup$

                    If you analyze the geodesics using Clairaut's relation, you'll find that the only closed geodesic on a hyperboloid of one sheet is the central circle. Indeed, the same holds for a concave surface of revolution of the same "shape" as the hyperboloid of one sheet.



                    EDIT: Apologies for missing the crucial compactness hypothesis.






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$












                    • $begingroup$
                      Lovely example, but a hyperboloid isn't compact, right?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Peter Kagey
                      1 hour ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      Oops. Sloppy reading. I'll delete.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Ted Shifrin
                      1 hour ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      It's a nice example; you should leave it.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Peter Kagey
                      1 hour ago















                    2












                    $begingroup$

                    If you analyze the geodesics using Clairaut's relation, you'll find that the only closed geodesic on a hyperboloid of one sheet is the central circle. Indeed, the same holds for a concave surface of revolution of the same "shape" as the hyperboloid of one sheet.



                    EDIT: Apologies for missing the crucial compactness hypothesis.






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$












                    • $begingroup$
                      Lovely example, but a hyperboloid isn't compact, right?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Peter Kagey
                      1 hour ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      Oops. Sloppy reading. I'll delete.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Ted Shifrin
                      1 hour ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      It's a nice example; you should leave it.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Peter Kagey
                      1 hour ago













                    2












                    2








                    2





                    $begingroup$

                    If you analyze the geodesics using Clairaut's relation, you'll find that the only closed geodesic on a hyperboloid of one sheet is the central circle. Indeed, the same holds for a concave surface of revolution of the same "shape" as the hyperboloid of one sheet.



                    EDIT: Apologies for missing the crucial compactness hypothesis.






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$



                    If you analyze the geodesics using Clairaut's relation, you'll find that the only closed geodesic on a hyperboloid of one sheet is the central circle. Indeed, the same holds for a concave surface of revolution of the same "shape" as the hyperboloid of one sheet.



                    EDIT: Apologies for missing the crucial compactness hypothesis.







                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    edited 1 hour ago

























                    answered 1 hour ago









                    Ted ShifrinTed Shifrin

                    65k44792




                    65k44792











                    • $begingroup$
                      Lovely example, but a hyperboloid isn't compact, right?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Peter Kagey
                      1 hour ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      Oops. Sloppy reading. I'll delete.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Ted Shifrin
                      1 hour ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      It's a nice example; you should leave it.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Peter Kagey
                      1 hour ago
















                    • $begingroup$
                      Lovely example, but a hyperboloid isn't compact, right?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Peter Kagey
                      1 hour ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      Oops. Sloppy reading. I'll delete.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Ted Shifrin
                      1 hour ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      It's a nice example; you should leave it.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Peter Kagey
                      1 hour ago















                    $begingroup$
                    Lovely example, but a hyperboloid isn't compact, right?
                    $endgroup$
                    – Peter Kagey
                    1 hour ago




                    $begingroup$
                    Lovely example, but a hyperboloid isn't compact, right?
                    $endgroup$
                    – Peter Kagey
                    1 hour ago












                    $begingroup$
                    Oops. Sloppy reading. I'll delete.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Ted Shifrin
                    1 hour ago




                    $begingroup$
                    Oops. Sloppy reading. I'll delete.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Ted Shifrin
                    1 hour ago












                    $begingroup$
                    It's a nice example; you should leave it.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Peter Kagey
                    1 hour ago




                    $begingroup$
                    It's a nice example; you should leave it.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Peter Kagey
                    1 hour ago

















                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3185649%2fexample-of-compact-riemannian-manifold-with-only-one-geodesic%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Reverse int within the 32-bit signed integer range: [−2^31, 2^31 − 1]Combining two 32-bit integers into one 64-bit integerDetermine if an int is within rangeLossy packing 32 bit integer to 16 bitComputing the square root of a 64-bit integerKeeping integer addition within boundsSafe multiplication of two 64-bit signed integersLeetcode 10: Regular Expression MatchingSigned integer-to-ascii x86_64 assembler macroReverse the digits of an Integer“Add two numbers given in reverse order from a linked list”

                    Category:Fedor von Bock Media in category "Fedor von Bock"Navigation menuUpload mediaISNI: 0000 0000 5511 3417VIAF ID: 24712551GND ID: 119294796Library of Congress authority ID: n96068363BnF ID: 12534305fSUDOC authorities ID: 034604189Open Library ID: OL338253ANKCR AUT ID: jn19990000869National Library of Israel ID: 000514068National Thesaurus for Author Names ID: 341574317ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

                    Kiel Indholdsfortegnelse Historie | Transport og færgeforbindelser | Sejlsport og anden sport | Kultur | Kendte personer fra Kiel | Noter | Litteratur | Eksterne henvisninger | Navigationsmenuwww.kiel.de54°19′31″N 10°8′26″Ø / 54.32528°N 10.14056°Ø / 54.32528; 10.14056Oberbürgermeister Dr. Ulf Kämpferwww.statistik-nord.deDen danske Stats StatistikKiels hjemmesiderrrWorldCat312794080n790547494030481-4