Reverse int within the 32-bit signed integer range: [−2^31, 2^31 − 1]Combining two 32-bit integers into one 64-bit integerDetermine if an int is within rangeLossy packing 32 bit integer to 16 bitComputing the square root of a 64-bit integerKeeping integer addition within boundsSafe multiplication of two 64-bit signed integersLeetcode 10: Regular Expression MatchingSigned integer-to-ascii x86_64 assembler macroReverse the digits of an Integer“Add two numbers given in reverse order from a linked list”

C++ debug of nlohmann json using GDB

Is this toilet slogan correct usage of the English language?

Symbol used to indicate indivisibility

What if a revenant (monster) gains fire resistance?

Is aluminum electrical wire used on aircraft?

Closed-form expression for certain product

Strong empirical falsification of quantum mechanics based on vacuum energy density

How should I respond when I lied about my education and the company finds out through background check?

Pre-mixing cryogenic fuels and using only one fuel tank

How do you respond to a colleague from another team when they're wrongly expecting that you'll help them?

How can I block email signup overlays or javascript popups in Safari?

How to implement a feedback to keep the DC gain at zero for this conceptual passive filter?

Count the occurrence of each unique word in the file

Why electric field inside a cavity of a non-conducting sphere not zero?

If infinitesimal transformations commute why dont the generators of the Lorentz group commute?

When were female captains banned from Starfleet?

Store Credit Card Information in Password Manager?

How can Trident be so inexpensive? Will it orbit Triton or just do a (slow) flyby?

height map for normal input sharp edges

Terse Method to Swap Lowest for Highest?

Added a new user on Ubuntu, set password not working?

Creepy dinosaur pc game identification

Is there any references on the tensor product of presentable (1-)categories?

How to indicate a cut out for a product window



Reverse int within the 32-bit signed integer range: [−2^31, 2^31 − 1]


Combining two 32-bit integers into one 64-bit integerDetermine if an int is within rangeLossy packing 32 bit integer to 16 bitComputing the square root of a 64-bit integerKeeping integer addition within boundsSafe multiplication of two 64-bit signed integersLeetcode 10: Regular Expression MatchingSigned integer-to-ascii x86_64 assembler macroReverse the digits of an Integer“Add two numbers given in reverse order from a linked list”













1












$begingroup$


Problem



Reverse digits of a 32-bit signed integer. When the reversed integer overflows return 0.



Feedback



Looking for any ways I can optimize this with modern c++ features overall. I hope my use of const correctness, exception handling, and assertions is implemented well here, please let me know. Is there any way I can use byte operations to reverse the int and keep track of the sign possibly?



Based on the submission feedback from LeetCode, is it safe to say that the time complexity is O(n) and space complexity is O(n)? If I can reduce the complexity in anyway would love to know! Thanks for the feedback in advance.



enter image description here



#include <cassert>
#include <climits>
#include <stdexcept>
#include <string>

class Solution

public:
int reverse(int i)
bool is_signed = false;
if(i < 0) is_signed = true;

auto i_string = std::to_string(i);

std::string reversed = "";
while(!i_string.empty())
reversed.push_back(i_string.back());
i_string.pop_back();


try
i = std::stoi(reversed);
catch (const std::out_of_range& e)
return 0;


if(is_signed) i *= -1;

return i;

;

int main()

Solution s;
assert(s.reverse(1) == 1);
assert(s.reverse(0) == 0);
assert(s.reverse(123) == 321);
assert(s.reverse(120) == 21);
assert(s.reverse(-123) == -321);
assert(s.reverse(1207) == 7021);
assert(s.reverse(INT_MAX) == 0);
assert(s.reverse(INT_MIN) == 0);










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    This leetcode.com/problems/reverse-integer ?
    $endgroup$
    – Martin R
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Yes that's the one
    $endgroup$
    – greg
    3 hours ago















1












$begingroup$


Problem



Reverse digits of a 32-bit signed integer. When the reversed integer overflows return 0.



Feedback



Looking for any ways I can optimize this with modern c++ features overall. I hope my use of const correctness, exception handling, and assertions is implemented well here, please let me know. Is there any way I can use byte operations to reverse the int and keep track of the sign possibly?



Based on the submission feedback from LeetCode, is it safe to say that the time complexity is O(n) and space complexity is O(n)? If I can reduce the complexity in anyway would love to know! Thanks for the feedback in advance.



enter image description here



#include <cassert>
#include <climits>
#include <stdexcept>
#include <string>

class Solution

public:
int reverse(int i)
bool is_signed = false;
if(i < 0) is_signed = true;

auto i_string = std::to_string(i);

std::string reversed = "";
while(!i_string.empty())
reversed.push_back(i_string.back());
i_string.pop_back();


try
i = std::stoi(reversed);
catch (const std::out_of_range& e)
return 0;


if(is_signed) i *= -1;

return i;

;

int main()

Solution s;
assert(s.reverse(1) == 1);
assert(s.reverse(0) == 0);
assert(s.reverse(123) == 321);
assert(s.reverse(120) == 21);
assert(s.reverse(-123) == -321);
assert(s.reverse(1207) == 7021);
assert(s.reverse(INT_MAX) == 0);
assert(s.reverse(INT_MIN) == 0);










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    This leetcode.com/problems/reverse-integer ?
    $endgroup$
    – Martin R
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Yes that's the one
    $endgroup$
    – greg
    3 hours ago













1












1








1





$begingroup$


Problem



Reverse digits of a 32-bit signed integer. When the reversed integer overflows return 0.



Feedback



Looking for any ways I can optimize this with modern c++ features overall. I hope my use of const correctness, exception handling, and assertions is implemented well here, please let me know. Is there any way I can use byte operations to reverse the int and keep track of the sign possibly?



Based on the submission feedback from LeetCode, is it safe to say that the time complexity is O(n) and space complexity is O(n)? If I can reduce the complexity in anyway would love to know! Thanks for the feedback in advance.



enter image description here



#include <cassert>
#include <climits>
#include <stdexcept>
#include <string>

class Solution

public:
int reverse(int i)
bool is_signed = false;
if(i < 0) is_signed = true;

auto i_string = std::to_string(i);

std::string reversed = "";
while(!i_string.empty())
reversed.push_back(i_string.back());
i_string.pop_back();


try
i = std::stoi(reversed);
catch (const std::out_of_range& e)
return 0;


if(is_signed) i *= -1;

return i;

;

int main()

Solution s;
assert(s.reverse(1) == 1);
assert(s.reverse(0) == 0);
assert(s.reverse(123) == 321);
assert(s.reverse(120) == 21);
assert(s.reverse(-123) == -321);
assert(s.reverse(1207) == 7021);
assert(s.reverse(INT_MAX) == 0);
assert(s.reverse(INT_MIN) == 0);










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




Problem



Reverse digits of a 32-bit signed integer. When the reversed integer overflows return 0.



Feedback



Looking for any ways I can optimize this with modern c++ features overall. I hope my use of const correctness, exception handling, and assertions is implemented well here, please let me know. Is there any way I can use byte operations to reverse the int and keep track of the sign possibly?



Based on the submission feedback from LeetCode, is it safe to say that the time complexity is O(n) and space complexity is O(n)? If I can reduce the complexity in anyway would love to know! Thanks for the feedback in advance.



enter image description here



#include <cassert>
#include <climits>
#include <stdexcept>
#include <string>

class Solution

public:
int reverse(int i)
bool is_signed = false;
if(i < 0) is_signed = true;

auto i_string = std::to_string(i);

std::string reversed = "";
while(!i_string.empty())
reversed.push_back(i_string.back());
i_string.pop_back();


try
i = std::stoi(reversed);
catch (const std::out_of_range& e)
return 0;


if(is_signed) i *= -1;

return i;

;

int main()

Solution s;
assert(s.reverse(1) == 1);
assert(s.reverse(0) == 0);
assert(s.reverse(123) == 321);
assert(s.reverse(120) == 21);
assert(s.reverse(-123) == -321);
assert(s.reverse(1207) == 7021);
assert(s.reverse(INT_MAX) == 0);
assert(s.reverse(INT_MIN) == 0);







c++ c++11 interview-questions integer






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 4 hours ago









Martin R

16.2k12366




16.2k12366










asked 4 hours ago









greggreg

37018




37018











  • $begingroup$
    This leetcode.com/problems/reverse-integer ?
    $endgroup$
    – Martin R
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Yes that's the one
    $endgroup$
    – greg
    3 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    This leetcode.com/problems/reverse-integer ?
    $endgroup$
    – Martin R
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Yes that's the one
    $endgroup$
    – greg
    3 hours ago















$begingroup$
This leetcode.com/problems/reverse-integer ?
$endgroup$
– Martin R
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
This leetcode.com/problems/reverse-integer ?
$endgroup$
– Martin R
4 hours ago












$begingroup$
Yes that's the one
$endgroup$
– greg
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
Yes that's the one
$endgroup$
– greg
3 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

General comments



  • There is no reason to use a class. Instead, the functionality should be made into a free function.


  • Your code is overly complicated. There is no reason to make new string from which you erase characters one-by-one. Instead, you can convert the input integer to a string and use a standard function to reverse that.


  • Also, pay attention to const correctness. This protects from unintended mistakes and helps the compiler optimize more.


I would simplify your function to just:



int reverse(int i) 

try

auto reversed std::to_string(i) ;
std::reverse(reversed.begin(), reversed.end());

const auto result std::stoi(reversed) ;
return i < 0 ? -1 * result : result;

catch (const std::out_of_range& e)

return 0;




Further comments




  • If you want to have a fast solution, you should avoid std::string altogether. This you can do by "iterating" through the digits using arithmetic operations (division and modulus), as in (using std::string to only show you what is happening):



    int x = 1234;
    std::string s;

    while (x > 0)

    s.push_back('0' + (x % 10));
    x /= 10;


    std::cout << s << "n"; // Prints 4321


    I will let you take it from here to use these ideas to make your program even faster.



  • Regarding your theoretical question concerning complexity, if we assume that the input is treated as a string of n characters, there is Omega(n) lower bound by a trivial adversary argument. Basically, if you don't spend at least n time, you can't read the whole of the input, and then you cannot guarantee correct output on every instance.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    );
    );
    , "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "196"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f216068%2freverse-int-within-the-32-bit-signed-integer-range-%25e2%2588%2592231-231-%25e2%2588%2592-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3












    $begingroup$

    General comments



    • There is no reason to use a class. Instead, the functionality should be made into a free function.


    • Your code is overly complicated. There is no reason to make new string from which you erase characters one-by-one. Instead, you can convert the input integer to a string and use a standard function to reverse that.


    • Also, pay attention to const correctness. This protects from unintended mistakes and helps the compiler optimize more.


    I would simplify your function to just:



    int reverse(int i) 

    try

    auto reversed std::to_string(i) ;
    std::reverse(reversed.begin(), reversed.end());

    const auto result std::stoi(reversed) ;
    return i < 0 ? -1 * result : result;

    catch (const std::out_of_range& e)

    return 0;




    Further comments




    • If you want to have a fast solution, you should avoid std::string altogether. This you can do by "iterating" through the digits using arithmetic operations (division and modulus), as in (using std::string to only show you what is happening):



      int x = 1234;
      std::string s;

      while (x > 0)

      s.push_back('0' + (x % 10));
      x /= 10;


      std::cout << s << "n"; // Prints 4321


      I will let you take it from here to use these ideas to make your program even faster.



    • Regarding your theoretical question concerning complexity, if we assume that the input is treated as a string of n characters, there is Omega(n) lower bound by a trivial adversary argument. Basically, if you don't spend at least n time, you can't read the whole of the input, and then you cannot guarantee correct output on every instance.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      3












      $begingroup$

      General comments



      • There is no reason to use a class. Instead, the functionality should be made into a free function.


      • Your code is overly complicated. There is no reason to make new string from which you erase characters one-by-one. Instead, you can convert the input integer to a string and use a standard function to reverse that.


      • Also, pay attention to const correctness. This protects from unintended mistakes and helps the compiler optimize more.


      I would simplify your function to just:



      int reverse(int i) 

      try

      auto reversed std::to_string(i) ;
      std::reverse(reversed.begin(), reversed.end());

      const auto result std::stoi(reversed) ;
      return i < 0 ? -1 * result : result;

      catch (const std::out_of_range& e)

      return 0;




      Further comments




      • If you want to have a fast solution, you should avoid std::string altogether. This you can do by "iterating" through the digits using arithmetic operations (division and modulus), as in (using std::string to only show you what is happening):



        int x = 1234;
        std::string s;

        while (x > 0)

        s.push_back('0' + (x % 10));
        x /= 10;


        std::cout << s << "n"; // Prints 4321


        I will let you take it from here to use these ideas to make your program even faster.



      • Regarding your theoretical question concerning complexity, if we assume that the input is treated as a string of n characters, there is Omega(n) lower bound by a trivial adversary argument. Basically, if you don't spend at least n time, you can't read the whole of the input, and then you cannot guarantee correct output on every instance.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















        3












        3








        3





        $begingroup$

        General comments



        • There is no reason to use a class. Instead, the functionality should be made into a free function.


        • Your code is overly complicated. There is no reason to make new string from which you erase characters one-by-one. Instead, you can convert the input integer to a string and use a standard function to reverse that.


        • Also, pay attention to const correctness. This protects from unintended mistakes and helps the compiler optimize more.


        I would simplify your function to just:



        int reverse(int i) 

        try

        auto reversed std::to_string(i) ;
        std::reverse(reversed.begin(), reversed.end());

        const auto result std::stoi(reversed) ;
        return i < 0 ? -1 * result : result;

        catch (const std::out_of_range& e)

        return 0;




        Further comments




        • If you want to have a fast solution, you should avoid std::string altogether. This you can do by "iterating" through the digits using arithmetic operations (division and modulus), as in (using std::string to only show you what is happening):



          int x = 1234;
          std::string s;

          while (x > 0)

          s.push_back('0' + (x % 10));
          x /= 10;


          std::cout << s << "n"; // Prints 4321


          I will let you take it from here to use these ideas to make your program even faster.



        • Regarding your theoretical question concerning complexity, if we assume that the input is treated as a string of n characters, there is Omega(n) lower bound by a trivial adversary argument. Basically, if you don't spend at least n time, you can't read the whole of the input, and then you cannot guarantee correct output on every instance.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        General comments



        • There is no reason to use a class. Instead, the functionality should be made into a free function.


        • Your code is overly complicated. There is no reason to make new string from which you erase characters one-by-one. Instead, you can convert the input integer to a string and use a standard function to reverse that.


        • Also, pay attention to const correctness. This protects from unintended mistakes and helps the compiler optimize more.


        I would simplify your function to just:



        int reverse(int i) 

        try

        auto reversed std::to_string(i) ;
        std::reverse(reversed.begin(), reversed.end());

        const auto result std::stoi(reversed) ;
        return i < 0 ? -1 * result : result;

        catch (const std::out_of_range& e)

        return 0;




        Further comments




        • If you want to have a fast solution, you should avoid std::string altogether. This you can do by "iterating" through the digits using arithmetic operations (division and modulus), as in (using std::string to only show you what is happening):



          int x = 1234;
          std::string s;

          while (x > 0)

          s.push_back('0' + (x % 10));
          x /= 10;


          std::cout << s << "n"; // Prints 4321


          I will let you take it from here to use these ideas to make your program even faster.



        • Regarding your theoretical question concerning complexity, if we assume that the input is treated as a string of n characters, there is Omega(n) lower bound by a trivial adversary argument. Basically, if you don't spend at least n time, you can't read the whole of the input, and then you cannot guarantee correct output on every instance.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 3 hours ago

























        answered 4 hours ago









        JuhoJuho

        1,471612




        1,471612



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f216068%2freverse-int-within-the-32-bit-signed-integer-range-%25e2%2588%2592231-231-%25e2%2588%2592-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Category:Fedor von Bock Media in category "Fedor von Bock"Navigation menuUpload mediaISNI: 0000 0000 5511 3417VIAF ID: 24712551GND ID: 119294796Library of Congress authority ID: n96068363BnF ID: 12534305fSUDOC authorities ID: 034604189Open Library ID: OL338253ANKCR AUT ID: jn19990000869National Library of Israel ID: 000514068National Thesaurus for Author Names ID: 341574317ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

            Kiel Indholdsfortegnelse Historie | Transport og færgeforbindelser | Sejlsport og anden sport | Kultur | Kendte personer fra Kiel | Noter | Litteratur | Eksterne henvisninger | Navigationsmenuwww.kiel.de54°19′31″N 10°8′26″Ø / 54.32528°N 10.14056°Ø / 54.32528; 10.14056Oberbürgermeister Dr. Ulf Kämpferwww.statistik-nord.deDen danske Stats StatistikKiels hjemmesiderrrWorldCat312794080n790547494030481-4