If you attempt to grapple an opponent that you are hidden from, do they roll at disadvantage?Is giving one side advantage always equivalent to giving disadvantage to the opponent?What is your chance to win in a contest where you have advantage and your opponent has disadvantage?Does advantage negate disadvantage (for things such as sneak attack)?Adding Precision Strike to an attack with advantageWhen does a hidden opponent that is attacking become visible?If you are grappled by a creature with 10'+ reach, can you make a ranged attack without disadvantage?Fighting in darkness spell. How does it work?When does a hidden opponent that is moving become visible?What issues could arise with this Advantage/Disadvantage Variant?Why is the wording different between Inquisitive and Swashbuckler Rogues' Sneak Attack-related subclass features?

How does it work when somebody invests in my business?

Opposite of a diet

Generic lambda vs generic function give different behaviour

Hostile work environment after whistle-blowing on coworker and our boss. What do I do?

Is a roofing delivery truck likely to crack my driveway slab?

Is there an Impartial Brexit Deal comparison site?

Tiptoe or tiphoof? Adjusting words to better fit fantasy races

Minimal reference content

Products and sum of cubes in Fibonacci

Failed to fetch jessie backports repository

apt-get update is failing in debian

At which point does a character regain all their Hit Dice?

Trouble understanding overseas colleagues

What is the term when two people sing in harmony, but they aren't singing the same notes?

The baby cries all morning

Is the destination of a commercial flight important for the pilot?

What is the intuitive meaning of having a linear relationship between the logs of two variables?

Valid Badminton Score?

Increase performance creating Mandelbrot set in python

voltage of sounds of mp3files

Student evaluations of teaching assistants

Why "be dealt cards" rather than "be dealing cards"?

How do I keep an essay about "feeling flat" from feeling flat?

Can I Retrieve Email Addresses from BCC?



If you attempt to grapple an opponent that you are hidden from, do they roll at disadvantage?


Is giving one side advantage always equivalent to giving disadvantage to the opponent?What is your chance to win in a contest where you have advantage and your opponent has disadvantage?Does advantage negate disadvantage (for things such as sneak attack)?Adding Precision Strike to an attack with advantageWhen does a hidden opponent that is attacking become visible?If you are grappled by a creature with 10'+ reach, can you make a ranged attack without disadvantage?Fighting in darkness spell. How does it work?When does a hidden opponent that is moving become visible?What issues could arise with this Advantage/Disadvantage Variant?Why is the wording different between Inquisitive and Swashbuckler Rogues' Sneak Attack-related subclass features?













2












$begingroup$


Quick and to the point, I'm aware that if you make an attack (which a grapple is) against an opponent you are hidden from you gain advantage, but since a grapple also is a contest roll, does the opponent also roll at disadvantage?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Gavin Davis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Where are you getting the idea that it would get disadvantage?
    $endgroup$
    – Smart_TJ
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance. How are you hiding from a creature that you are in grappling range of?
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    1 hour ago
















2












$begingroup$


Quick and to the point, I'm aware that if you make an attack (which a grapple is) against an opponent you are hidden from you gain advantage, but since a grapple also is a contest roll, does the opponent also roll at disadvantage?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Gavin Davis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Where are you getting the idea that it would get disadvantage?
    $endgroup$
    – Smart_TJ
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance. How are you hiding from a creature that you are in grappling range of?
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    1 hour ago














2












2








2





$begingroup$


Quick and to the point, I'm aware that if you make an attack (which a grapple is) against an opponent you are hidden from you gain advantage, but since a grapple also is a contest roll, does the opponent also roll at disadvantage?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Gavin Davis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




Quick and to the point, I'm aware that if you make an attack (which a grapple is) against an opponent you are hidden from you gain advantage, but since a grapple also is a contest roll, does the opponent also roll at disadvantage?







dnd-5e grapple stealth advantage-and-disadvantage






share|improve this question









New contributor




Gavin Davis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Gavin Davis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 58 mins ago









V2Blast

25.6k488158




25.6k488158






New contributor




Gavin Davis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 hours ago









Gavin DavisGavin Davis

111




111




New contributor




Gavin Davis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Gavin Davis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Gavin Davis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Where are you getting the idea that it would get disadvantage?
    $endgroup$
    – Smart_TJ
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance. How are you hiding from a creature that you are in grappling range of?
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    1 hour ago













  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Where are you getting the idea that it would get disadvantage?
    $endgroup$
    – Smart_TJ
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance. How are you hiding from a creature that you are in grappling range of?
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    1 hour ago








1




1




$begingroup$
Where are you getting the idea that it would get disadvantage?
$endgroup$
– Smart_TJ
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
Where are you getting the idea that it would get disadvantage?
$endgroup$
– Smart_TJ
1 hour ago












$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance. How are you hiding from a creature that you are in grappling range of?
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
1 hour ago





$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance. How are you hiding from a creature that you are in grappling range of?
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
1 hour ago











3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















6












$begingroup$

Unless a DM determines otherwise, you do not get advantage and the opponent does not get disadvantage



The rule for Unseen Attackers states:




When a creature can’t see you, you have advantage on Attack rolls against it.




The rules for Grappling state:




Using at least one free hand, you try to seize the target by making a grapple check instead of an Attack roll




What this means is that, by making a grapple attempt instead of a melee attack, you do not get advantage nor does your opponent have disadvantage because the rules for Unseen Attackers does not convey any sort of penalty to a creature making ability checks against unseen attackers.




That said, as Linksassin points out a DM is always free to use the general rule for disadvantage/advantage to impart one or both of these to the grapple participants:




The GM can also decide that circumstances influence a roll in one direction or the other and grant advantage or impose disadvantage as a result.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    2












    $begingroup$

    No.



    If you are hidden from your target when you attack it using the Attack action, you indeed have advantage on an attack roll (see Unseen Attackers and Targets):




    When a creature can't see you, you have advantage on attack rolls against it.




    And a grapple is indeed a special attack made using the Attack action (see Grappling):




    When you want to grab a creature or wrestle with it, you can use the Attack action to make a special melee attack, a grapple.




    However, grappling doesn't actually involve an attack roll (same section as above):




    ...you try to seize the target by making a grapple check instead of an attack roll: a Strength (Athletics) check contested by the target's Strength (Athletics) or Dexterity (Acrobatics) check (the target chooses the ability to use).




    Since it's not an attack roll, you don't have advantage on it due to being hidden.



    Furthermore, there's nothing in the rules to suggest that being hidden applies advantage or disadvantage to any ability check. The fact that an attack roll made from hiding normally has advantage does not imply that an ability check made from hiding would be made with advantage, nor that it would confer disadvantage on the ability check made by an opponent in a contest.



    In addition, there is no general rule that if you have advantage in some scenario then your opponent automatically has disadvantage in the reverse scenario. For example, there's no rule to suggest that if you have advantage on an ability check then your opponent has disadvantage. There are some specific rules that work in this way (for example, if you are invisible and your opponent is not then your attacks are at advantage and theirs are at disadvantage), but in such cases the dichotomy is explicitly stated in the rules.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$




















      1












      $begingroup$

      There's no rule that says you do



      Rykara and Bloodcinder's excellent answers do a good job of explaining that there is no explicit rule that grant advantage or imposes disadvantage when the grappler is unseen.




      When a creature can't see you, you have advantage on attack rolls against it.




      You gain advantage on attack rolls, that's it. However...



      Your DM may rule you do



      From the general rules on advantage/disadvantage we have the following:




      The GM can also decide that circumstances influence a roll in one direction or the other and grant advantage or impose disadvantage as a result.




      This is a final catch-all, DM-knows-best rule that is designed for situations like this where the rules don't quite cover it. Your DM may choose to rule that you have advantage on your check, or the target has disadvantage. I wouldn't suggest applying both as this would be too strong.



      At my table I rule that the target has disadvantage on their check as they were unprepared for it. This only applies to the initial grapple attempt however and attempts to break free are made as normal. This has never caused an issue (not that it has come up that often) and makes the players feel rewarded for intelligent play.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$












        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
        );
        );
        , "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "122"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader:
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        ,
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );






        Gavin Davis is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f144002%2fif-you-attempt-to-grapple-an-opponent-that-you-are-hidden-from-do-they-roll-at%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes








        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        6












        $begingroup$

        Unless a DM determines otherwise, you do not get advantage and the opponent does not get disadvantage



        The rule for Unseen Attackers states:




        When a creature can’t see you, you have advantage on Attack rolls against it.




        The rules for Grappling state:




        Using at least one free hand, you try to seize the target by making a grapple check instead of an Attack roll




        What this means is that, by making a grapple attempt instead of a melee attack, you do not get advantage nor does your opponent have disadvantage because the rules for Unseen Attackers does not convey any sort of penalty to a creature making ability checks against unseen attackers.




        That said, as Linksassin points out a DM is always free to use the general rule for disadvantage/advantage to impart one or both of these to the grapple participants:




        The GM can also decide that circumstances influence a roll in one direction or the other and grant advantage or impose disadvantage as a result.







        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$

















          6












          $begingroup$

          Unless a DM determines otherwise, you do not get advantage and the opponent does not get disadvantage



          The rule for Unseen Attackers states:




          When a creature can’t see you, you have advantage on Attack rolls against it.




          The rules for Grappling state:




          Using at least one free hand, you try to seize the target by making a grapple check instead of an Attack roll




          What this means is that, by making a grapple attempt instead of a melee attack, you do not get advantage nor does your opponent have disadvantage because the rules for Unseen Attackers does not convey any sort of penalty to a creature making ability checks against unseen attackers.




          That said, as Linksassin points out a DM is always free to use the general rule for disadvantage/advantage to impart one or both of these to the grapple participants:




          The GM can also decide that circumstances influence a roll in one direction or the other and grant advantage or impose disadvantage as a result.







          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$















            6












            6








            6





            $begingroup$

            Unless a DM determines otherwise, you do not get advantage and the opponent does not get disadvantage



            The rule for Unseen Attackers states:




            When a creature can’t see you, you have advantage on Attack rolls against it.




            The rules for Grappling state:




            Using at least one free hand, you try to seize the target by making a grapple check instead of an Attack roll




            What this means is that, by making a grapple attempt instead of a melee attack, you do not get advantage nor does your opponent have disadvantage because the rules for Unseen Attackers does not convey any sort of penalty to a creature making ability checks against unseen attackers.




            That said, as Linksassin points out a DM is always free to use the general rule for disadvantage/advantage to impart one or both of these to the grapple participants:




            The GM can also decide that circumstances influence a roll in one direction or the other and grant advantage or impose disadvantage as a result.







            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Unless a DM determines otherwise, you do not get advantage and the opponent does not get disadvantage



            The rule for Unseen Attackers states:




            When a creature can’t see you, you have advantage on Attack rolls against it.




            The rules for Grappling state:




            Using at least one free hand, you try to seize the target by making a grapple check instead of an Attack roll




            What this means is that, by making a grapple attempt instead of a melee attack, you do not get advantage nor does your opponent have disadvantage because the rules for Unseen Attackers does not convey any sort of penalty to a creature making ability checks against unseen attackers.




            That said, as Linksassin points out a DM is always free to use the general rule for disadvantage/advantage to impart one or both of these to the grapple participants:




            The GM can also decide that circumstances influence a roll in one direction or the other and grant advantage or impose disadvantage as a result.








            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 57 mins ago









            V2Blast

            25.6k488158




            25.6k488158










            answered 1 hour ago









            RykaraRykara

            4,7011040




            4,7011040























                2












                $begingroup$

                No.



                If you are hidden from your target when you attack it using the Attack action, you indeed have advantage on an attack roll (see Unseen Attackers and Targets):




                When a creature can't see you, you have advantage on attack rolls against it.




                And a grapple is indeed a special attack made using the Attack action (see Grappling):




                When you want to grab a creature or wrestle with it, you can use the Attack action to make a special melee attack, a grapple.




                However, grappling doesn't actually involve an attack roll (same section as above):




                ...you try to seize the target by making a grapple check instead of an attack roll: a Strength (Athletics) check contested by the target's Strength (Athletics) or Dexterity (Acrobatics) check (the target chooses the ability to use).




                Since it's not an attack roll, you don't have advantage on it due to being hidden.



                Furthermore, there's nothing in the rules to suggest that being hidden applies advantage or disadvantage to any ability check. The fact that an attack roll made from hiding normally has advantage does not imply that an ability check made from hiding would be made with advantage, nor that it would confer disadvantage on the ability check made by an opponent in a contest.



                In addition, there is no general rule that if you have advantage in some scenario then your opponent automatically has disadvantage in the reverse scenario. For example, there's no rule to suggest that if you have advantage on an ability check then your opponent has disadvantage. There are some specific rules that work in this way (for example, if you are invisible and your opponent is not then your attacks are at advantage and theirs are at disadvantage), but in such cases the dichotomy is explicitly stated in the rules.






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$

















                  2












                  $begingroup$

                  No.



                  If you are hidden from your target when you attack it using the Attack action, you indeed have advantage on an attack roll (see Unseen Attackers and Targets):




                  When a creature can't see you, you have advantage on attack rolls against it.




                  And a grapple is indeed a special attack made using the Attack action (see Grappling):




                  When you want to grab a creature or wrestle with it, you can use the Attack action to make a special melee attack, a grapple.




                  However, grappling doesn't actually involve an attack roll (same section as above):




                  ...you try to seize the target by making a grapple check instead of an attack roll: a Strength (Athletics) check contested by the target's Strength (Athletics) or Dexterity (Acrobatics) check (the target chooses the ability to use).




                  Since it's not an attack roll, you don't have advantage on it due to being hidden.



                  Furthermore, there's nothing in the rules to suggest that being hidden applies advantage or disadvantage to any ability check. The fact that an attack roll made from hiding normally has advantage does not imply that an ability check made from hiding would be made with advantage, nor that it would confer disadvantage on the ability check made by an opponent in a contest.



                  In addition, there is no general rule that if you have advantage in some scenario then your opponent automatically has disadvantage in the reverse scenario. For example, there's no rule to suggest that if you have advantage on an ability check then your opponent has disadvantage. There are some specific rules that work in this way (for example, if you are invisible and your opponent is not then your attacks are at advantage and theirs are at disadvantage), but in such cases the dichotomy is explicitly stated in the rules.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$















                    2












                    2








                    2





                    $begingroup$

                    No.



                    If you are hidden from your target when you attack it using the Attack action, you indeed have advantage on an attack roll (see Unseen Attackers and Targets):




                    When a creature can't see you, you have advantage on attack rolls against it.




                    And a grapple is indeed a special attack made using the Attack action (see Grappling):




                    When you want to grab a creature or wrestle with it, you can use the Attack action to make a special melee attack, a grapple.




                    However, grappling doesn't actually involve an attack roll (same section as above):




                    ...you try to seize the target by making a grapple check instead of an attack roll: a Strength (Athletics) check contested by the target's Strength (Athletics) or Dexterity (Acrobatics) check (the target chooses the ability to use).




                    Since it's not an attack roll, you don't have advantage on it due to being hidden.



                    Furthermore, there's nothing in the rules to suggest that being hidden applies advantage or disadvantage to any ability check. The fact that an attack roll made from hiding normally has advantage does not imply that an ability check made from hiding would be made with advantage, nor that it would confer disadvantage on the ability check made by an opponent in a contest.



                    In addition, there is no general rule that if you have advantage in some scenario then your opponent automatically has disadvantage in the reverse scenario. For example, there's no rule to suggest that if you have advantage on an ability check then your opponent has disadvantage. There are some specific rules that work in this way (for example, if you are invisible and your opponent is not then your attacks are at advantage and theirs are at disadvantage), but in such cases the dichotomy is explicitly stated in the rules.






                    share|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$



                    No.



                    If you are hidden from your target when you attack it using the Attack action, you indeed have advantage on an attack roll (see Unseen Attackers and Targets):




                    When a creature can't see you, you have advantage on attack rolls against it.




                    And a grapple is indeed a special attack made using the Attack action (see Grappling):




                    When you want to grab a creature or wrestle with it, you can use the Attack action to make a special melee attack, a grapple.




                    However, grappling doesn't actually involve an attack roll (same section as above):




                    ...you try to seize the target by making a grapple check instead of an attack roll: a Strength (Athletics) check contested by the target's Strength (Athletics) or Dexterity (Acrobatics) check (the target chooses the ability to use).




                    Since it's not an attack roll, you don't have advantage on it due to being hidden.



                    Furthermore, there's nothing in the rules to suggest that being hidden applies advantage or disadvantage to any ability check. The fact that an attack roll made from hiding normally has advantage does not imply that an ability check made from hiding would be made with advantage, nor that it would confer disadvantage on the ability check made by an opponent in a contest.



                    In addition, there is no general rule that if you have advantage in some scenario then your opponent automatically has disadvantage in the reverse scenario. For example, there's no rule to suggest that if you have advantage on an ability check then your opponent has disadvantage. There are some specific rules that work in this way (for example, if you are invisible and your opponent is not then your attacks are at advantage and theirs are at disadvantage), but in such cases the dichotomy is explicitly stated in the rules.







                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited 57 mins ago









                    V2Blast

                    25.6k488158




                    25.6k488158










                    answered 1 hour ago









                    BloodcinderBloodcinder

                    23k382140




                    23k382140





















                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        There's no rule that says you do



                        Rykara and Bloodcinder's excellent answers do a good job of explaining that there is no explicit rule that grant advantage or imposes disadvantage when the grappler is unseen.




                        When a creature can't see you, you have advantage on attack rolls against it.




                        You gain advantage on attack rolls, that's it. However...



                        Your DM may rule you do



                        From the general rules on advantage/disadvantage we have the following:




                        The GM can also decide that circumstances influence a roll in one direction or the other and grant advantage or impose disadvantage as a result.




                        This is a final catch-all, DM-knows-best rule that is designed for situations like this where the rules don't quite cover it. Your DM may choose to rule that you have advantage on your check, or the target has disadvantage. I wouldn't suggest applying both as this would be too strong.



                        At my table I rule that the target has disadvantage on their check as they were unprepared for it. This only applies to the initial grapple attempt however and attempts to break free are made as normal. This has never caused an issue (not that it has come up that often) and makes the players feel rewarded for intelligent play.






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$

















                          1












                          $begingroup$

                          There's no rule that says you do



                          Rykara and Bloodcinder's excellent answers do a good job of explaining that there is no explicit rule that grant advantage or imposes disadvantage when the grappler is unseen.




                          When a creature can't see you, you have advantage on attack rolls against it.




                          You gain advantage on attack rolls, that's it. However...



                          Your DM may rule you do



                          From the general rules on advantage/disadvantage we have the following:




                          The GM can also decide that circumstances influence a roll in one direction or the other and grant advantage or impose disadvantage as a result.




                          This is a final catch-all, DM-knows-best rule that is designed for situations like this where the rules don't quite cover it. Your DM may choose to rule that you have advantage on your check, or the target has disadvantage. I wouldn't suggest applying both as this would be too strong.



                          At my table I rule that the target has disadvantage on their check as they were unprepared for it. This only applies to the initial grapple attempt however and attempts to break free are made as normal. This has never caused an issue (not that it has come up that often) and makes the players feel rewarded for intelligent play.






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$















                            1












                            1








                            1





                            $begingroup$

                            There's no rule that says you do



                            Rykara and Bloodcinder's excellent answers do a good job of explaining that there is no explicit rule that grant advantage or imposes disadvantage when the grappler is unseen.




                            When a creature can't see you, you have advantage on attack rolls against it.




                            You gain advantage on attack rolls, that's it. However...



                            Your DM may rule you do



                            From the general rules on advantage/disadvantage we have the following:




                            The GM can also decide that circumstances influence a roll in one direction or the other and grant advantage or impose disadvantage as a result.




                            This is a final catch-all, DM-knows-best rule that is designed for situations like this where the rules don't quite cover it. Your DM may choose to rule that you have advantage on your check, or the target has disadvantage. I wouldn't suggest applying both as this would be too strong.



                            At my table I rule that the target has disadvantage on their check as they were unprepared for it. This only applies to the initial grapple attempt however and attempts to break free are made as normal. This has never caused an issue (not that it has come up that often) and makes the players feel rewarded for intelligent play.






                            share|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            There's no rule that says you do



                            Rykara and Bloodcinder's excellent answers do a good job of explaining that there is no explicit rule that grant advantage or imposes disadvantage when the grappler is unseen.




                            When a creature can't see you, you have advantage on attack rolls against it.




                            You gain advantage on attack rolls, that's it. However...



                            Your DM may rule you do



                            From the general rules on advantage/disadvantage we have the following:




                            The GM can also decide that circumstances influence a roll in one direction or the other and grant advantage or impose disadvantage as a result.




                            This is a final catch-all, DM-knows-best rule that is designed for situations like this where the rules don't quite cover it. Your DM may choose to rule that you have advantage on your check, or the target has disadvantage. I wouldn't suggest applying both as this would be too strong.



                            At my table I rule that the target has disadvantage on their check as they were unprepared for it. This only applies to the initial grapple attempt however and attempts to break free are made as normal. This has never caused an issue (not that it has come up that often) and makes the players feel rewarded for intelligent play.







                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered 1 hour ago









                            linksassinlinksassin

                            8,92212967




                            8,92212967




















                                Gavin Davis is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                                draft saved

                                draft discarded


















                                Gavin Davis is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                                Gavin Davis is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                                Gavin Davis is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f144002%2fif-you-attempt-to-grapple-an-opponent-that-you-are-hidden-from-do-they-roll-at%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Reverse int within the 32-bit signed integer range: [−2^31, 2^31 − 1]Combining two 32-bit integers into one 64-bit integerDetermine if an int is within rangeLossy packing 32 bit integer to 16 bitComputing the square root of a 64-bit integerKeeping integer addition within boundsSafe multiplication of two 64-bit signed integersLeetcode 10: Regular Expression MatchingSigned integer-to-ascii x86_64 assembler macroReverse the digits of an Integer“Add two numbers given in reverse order from a linked list”

                                Category:Fedor von Bock Media in category "Fedor von Bock"Navigation menuUpload mediaISNI: 0000 0000 5511 3417VIAF ID: 24712551GND ID: 119294796Library of Congress authority ID: n96068363BnF ID: 12534305fSUDOC authorities ID: 034604189Open Library ID: OL338253ANKCR AUT ID: jn19990000869National Library of Israel ID: 000514068National Thesaurus for Author Names ID: 341574317ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

                                Kiel Indholdsfortegnelse Historie | Transport og færgeforbindelser | Sejlsport og anden sport | Kultur | Kendte personer fra Kiel | Noter | Litteratur | Eksterne henvisninger | Navigationsmenuwww.kiel.de54°19′31″N 10°8′26″Ø / 54.32528°N 10.14056°Ø / 54.32528; 10.14056Oberbürgermeister Dr. Ulf Kämpferwww.statistik-nord.deDen danske Stats StatistikKiels hjemmesiderrrWorldCat312794080n790547494030481-4