Does the STL have a way to apply a function before calling less than? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) The Ask Question Wizard is Live! Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experienceDoes the 'mutable' keyword have any purpose other than allowing the variable to be modified by a const function?Pretty-print C++ STL containersElegant way to find closest value in a vector from aboveLess-than function dereferencing pointersShould custom containers have free begin/end functions?why do std::sort and partial_sort require random-access iterators?c++ Sort Vector based on distance to external PointHow can I avoid “for” loops with an “if” condition inside them with C++?Do STL algorithms functions, like accumulate, avoid copy if the function passed to them accepts a reference?Why does std::sort segfault with non-transitive comparators?

Is it possible to ask for a hotel room without minibar/extra services?

Autumning in love

How to market an anarchic city as a tourism spot to people living in civilized areas?

Classification of bundles, Postnikov towers, obstruction theory, local coefficients

Working around an AWS network ACL rule limit

Keep going mode for require-package

How can I protect witches in combat who wear limited clothing?

Writing Thesis: Copying from published papers

Can't figure this one out.. What is the missing box?

How many spell slots should a Fighter 11/Ranger 9 have?

3 doors, three guards, one stone

Problem when applying foreach loop

Active filter with series inductor and resistor - do these exist?

Losing the Initialization Vector in Cipher Block Chaining

Interesting examples of non-locally compact topological groups

Am I ethically obligated to go into work on an off day if the reason is sudden?

What to do with post with dry rot?

Why don't the Weasley twins use magic outside of school if the Trace can only find the location of spells cast?

Why is there no army of Iron-Mans in the MCU?

Determine whether f is a function, an injection, a surjection

If A makes B more likely then B makes A more likely"

How do you clear the ApexPages.getMessages() collection in a test?

Fishing simulator

Strange behaviour of Check



Does the STL have a way to apply a function before calling less than?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
The Ask Question Wizard is Live!
Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experienceDoes the 'mutable' keyword have any purpose other than allowing the variable to be modified by a const function?Pretty-print C++ STL containersElegant way to find closest value in a vector from aboveLess-than function dereferencing pointersShould custom containers have free begin/end functions?why do std::sort and partial_sort require random-access iterators?c++ Sort Vector based on distance to external PointHow can I avoid “for” loops with an “if” condition inside them with C++?Do STL algorithms functions, like accumulate, avoid copy if the function passed to them accepts a reference?Why does std::sort segfault with non-transitive comparators?



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








9















A lot of algorithms accept a comparison object. Often, I end up with something like



std::sort(begin, end, [&](auto const& lhs, auto const& rhs) 
return Function(lhs) < Function(rhs);
);


Is there anything in the STL to apply a Function before calling less than? So I could write:



std::sort(begin, end, std::DoesThisExist(Function));


I know I could write my own, but I wonder if this already exists. I glanced through cpprefence but didn't see it. Could easily have missed it.










share|improve this question







New contributor




Fomar putes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • I don't think this exists, however, it should be very easy to write.

    – JVApen
    2 hours ago

















9















A lot of algorithms accept a comparison object. Often, I end up with something like



std::sort(begin, end, [&](auto const& lhs, auto const& rhs) 
return Function(lhs) < Function(rhs);
);


Is there anything in the STL to apply a Function before calling less than? So I could write:



std::sort(begin, end, std::DoesThisExist(Function));


I know I could write my own, but I wonder if this already exists. I glanced through cpprefence but didn't see it. Could easily have missed it.










share|improve this question







New contributor




Fomar putes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • I don't think this exists, however, it should be very easy to write.

    – JVApen
    2 hours ago













9












9








9








A lot of algorithms accept a comparison object. Often, I end up with something like



std::sort(begin, end, [&](auto const& lhs, auto const& rhs) 
return Function(lhs) < Function(rhs);
);


Is there anything in the STL to apply a Function before calling less than? So I could write:



std::sort(begin, end, std::DoesThisExist(Function));


I know I could write my own, but I wonder if this already exists. I glanced through cpprefence but didn't see it. Could easily have missed it.










share|improve this question







New contributor




Fomar putes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












A lot of algorithms accept a comparison object. Often, I end up with something like



std::sort(begin, end, [&](auto const& lhs, auto const& rhs) 
return Function(lhs) < Function(rhs);
);


Is there anything in the STL to apply a Function before calling less than? So I could write:



std::sort(begin, end, std::DoesThisExist(Function));


I know I could write my own, but I wonder if this already exists. I glanced through cpprefence but didn't see it. Could easily have missed it.







c++






share|improve this question







New contributor




Fomar putes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




Fomar putes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




Fomar putes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 4 hours ago









Fomar putesFomar putes

483




483




New contributor




Fomar putes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Fomar putes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Fomar putes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • I don't think this exists, however, it should be very easy to write.

    – JVApen
    2 hours ago

















  • I don't think this exists, however, it should be very easy to write.

    – JVApen
    2 hours ago
















I don't think this exists, however, it should be very easy to write.

– JVApen
2 hours ago





I don't think this exists, however, it should be very easy to write.

– JVApen
2 hours ago












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4














The STL should have a sort that works on a transform of the elements rather than the elements themselves. The reason for this being that Function could actually be costly. By simply incorporating it into the comparison as you did you invoke Function nlog(n) times rather than the optimal n.




To sort arrays in parallel using STL algorithm :




std::sort(std::execution::par, container.begin(), container.end(), comparison_object);


Anyway, I think if you try to just sort with ranges::view::transform it will probably still call your function ~n log n many times. But you could just do something like:



auto values = /* some container */;
auto keys = values | ranges::view::transform(f) | ranges::to_vector;
ranges::sort(ranges::view::zip(keys, values),
[](auto const& x, auto const& y) return std::get<0>(x) < std::get<0>(y); );





share|improve this answer























  • Calling a transform n log n times matters only if its expense is significant compared to the comparison and permutation. In common cases where the “transform” is just selecting a member or performing simple arithmetic, allocating the space for the key values would be much worse than the repeated work.

    – Davis Herring
    15 mins ago


















1














The Ranges TS (which has been merged for C++20) defines variations of many of the standard algorithms that include projections with exactly this behavior.






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    );
    );
    , "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    Fomar putes is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55678360%2fdoes-the-stl-have-a-way-to-apply-a-function-before-calling-less-than%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4














    The STL should have a sort that works on a transform of the elements rather than the elements themselves. The reason for this being that Function could actually be costly. By simply incorporating it into the comparison as you did you invoke Function nlog(n) times rather than the optimal n.




    To sort arrays in parallel using STL algorithm :




    std::sort(std::execution::par, container.begin(), container.end(), comparison_object);


    Anyway, I think if you try to just sort with ranges::view::transform it will probably still call your function ~n log n many times. But you could just do something like:



    auto values = /* some container */;
    auto keys = values | ranges::view::transform(f) | ranges::to_vector;
    ranges::sort(ranges::view::zip(keys, values),
    [](auto const& x, auto const& y) return std::get<0>(x) < std::get<0>(y); );





    share|improve this answer























    • Calling a transform n log n times matters only if its expense is significant compared to the comparison and permutation. In common cases where the “transform” is just selecting a member or performing simple arithmetic, allocating the space for the key values would be much worse than the repeated work.

      – Davis Herring
      15 mins ago















    4














    The STL should have a sort that works on a transform of the elements rather than the elements themselves. The reason for this being that Function could actually be costly. By simply incorporating it into the comparison as you did you invoke Function nlog(n) times rather than the optimal n.




    To sort arrays in parallel using STL algorithm :




    std::sort(std::execution::par, container.begin(), container.end(), comparison_object);


    Anyway, I think if you try to just sort with ranges::view::transform it will probably still call your function ~n log n many times. But you could just do something like:



    auto values = /* some container */;
    auto keys = values | ranges::view::transform(f) | ranges::to_vector;
    ranges::sort(ranges::view::zip(keys, values),
    [](auto const& x, auto const& y) return std::get<0>(x) < std::get<0>(y); );





    share|improve this answer























    • Calling a transform n log n times matters only if its expense is significant compared to the comparison and permutation. In common cases where the “transform” is just selecting a member or performing simple arithmetic, allocating the space for the key values would be much worse than the repeated work.

      – Davis Herring
      15 mins ago













    4












    4








    4







    The STL should have a sort that works on a transform of the elements rather than the elements themselves. The reason for this being that Function could actually be costly. By simply incorporating it into the comparison as you did you invoke Function nlog(n) times rather than the optimal n.




    To sort arrays in parallel using STL algorithm :




    std::sort(std::execution::par, container.begin(), container.end(), comparison_object);


    Anyway, I think if you try to just sort with ranges::view::transform it will probably still call your function ~n log n many times. But you could just do something like:



    auto values = /* some container */;
    auto keys = values | ranges::view::transform(f) | ranges::to_vector;
    ranges::sort(ranges::view::zip(keys, values),
    [](auto const& x, auto const& y) return std::get<0>(x) < std::get<0>(y); );





    share|improve this answer













    The STL should have a sort that works on a transform of the elements rather than the elements themselves. The reason for this being that Function could actually be costly. By simply incorporating it into the comparison as you did you invoke Function nlog(n) times rather than the optimal n.




    To sort arrays in parallel using STL algorithm :




    std::sort(std::execution::par, container.begin(), container.end(), comparison_object);


    Anyway, I think if you try to just sort with ranges::view::transform it will probably still call your function ~n log n many times. But you could just do something like:



    auto values = /* some container */;
    auto keys = values | ranges::view::transform(f) | ranges::to_vector;
    ranges::sort(ranges::view::zip(keys, values),
    [](auto const& x, auto const& y) return std::get<0>(x) < std::get<0>(y); );






    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 2 hours ago









    Ben Chaliah AyoubBen Chaliah Ayoub

    2,422217




    2,422217












    • Calling a transform n log n times matters only if its expense is significant compared to the comparison and permutation. In common cases where the “transform” is just selecting a member or performing simple arithmetic, allocating the space for the key values would be much worse than the repeated work.

      – Davis Herring
      15 mins ago

















    • Calling a transform n log n times matters only if its expense is significant compared to the comparison and permutation. In common cases where the “transform” is just selecting a member or performing simple arithmetic, allocating the space for the key values would be much worse than the repeated work.

      – Davis Herring
      15 mins ago
















    Calling a transform n log n times matters only if its expense is significant compared to the comparison and permutation. In common cases where the “transform” is just selecting a member or performing simple arithmetic, allocating the space for the key values would be much worse than the repeated work.

    – Davis Herring
    15 mins ago





    Calling a transform n log n times matters only if its expense is significant compared to the comparison and permutation. In common cases where the “transform” is just selecting a member or performing simple arithmetic, allocating the space for the key values would be much worse than the repeated work.

    – Davis Herring
    15 mins ago













    1














    The Ranges TS (which has been merged for C++20) defines variations of many of the standard algorithms that include projections with exactly this behavior.






    share|improve this answer



























      1














      The Ranges TS (which has been merged for C++20) defines variations of many of the standard algorithms that include projections with exactly this behavior.






      share|improve this answer

























        1












        1








        1







        The Ranges TS (which has been merged for C++20) defines variations of many of the standard algorithms that include projections with exactly this behavior.






        share|improve this answer













        The Ranges TS (which has been merged for C++20) defines variations of many of the standard algorithms that include projections with exactly this behavior.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 4 hours ago









        Davis HerringDavis Herring

        9,0901736




        9,0901736




















            Fomar putes is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Fomar putes is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Fomar putes is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            Fomar putes is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55678360%2fdoes-the-stl-have-a-way-to-apply-a-function-before-calling-less-than%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Category:Fedor von Bock Media in category "Fedor von Bock"Navigation menuUpload mediaISNI: 0000 0000 5511 3417VIAF ID: 24712551GND ID: 119294796Library of Congress authority ID: n96068363BnF ID: 12534305fSUDOC authorities ID: 034604189Open Library ID: OL338253ANKCR AUT ID: jn19990000869National Library of Israel ID: 000514068National Thesaurus for Author Names ID: 341574317ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

            Reverse int within the 32-bit signed integer range: [−2^31, 2^31 − 1]Combining two 32-bit integers into one 64-bit integerDetermine if an int is within rangeLossy packing 32 bit integer to 16 bitComputing the square root of a 64-bit integerKeeping integer addition within boundsSafe multiplication of two 64-bit signed integersLeetcode 10: Regular Expression MatchingSigned integer-to-ascii x86_64 assembler macroReverse the digits of an Integer“Add two numbers given in reverse order from a linked list”

            Log på Navigationsmenu