How to answer “Have you ever been terminated?” Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How do you develop a solid hiring workflow?Should I mention to have been previously “rejected”?Laid off 3 months into first job out of college. How to present this to prospective employers?Looking for a new job while under contractHow to answer questions about desired salary?Is it appropriate to mention how long you've been applying at the same company?How can I find out whether I have a blot on my HR record?How to handle interview questions about job on which I was unfairly terminated?How to explain why I know the company's employee conditions?Fraudulent job applications with no discernible purpose. Have you ever seen them? Any idea of the motive?

Identify plant with long narrow paired leaves and reddish stems

At the end of Thor: Ragnarok why don't the Asgardians turn and head for the Bifrost as per their original plan?

Why aren't air breathing engines used as small first stages

Why do people hide their license plates in the EU?

Coloring maths inside a tcolorbox

Should I use a zero-interest credit card for a large one-time purchase?

Identifying polygons that intersect with another layer using QGIS?

Withdrew £2800, but only £2000 shows as withdrawn on online banking; what are my obligations?

How to run gsettings for another user Ubuntu 18.04.2 LTS

How to bypass password on Windows XP account?

Overriding an object in memory with placement new

Can a non-EU citizen traveling with me come with me through the EU passport line?

Book where humans were engineered with genes from animal species to survive hostile planets

2001: A Space Odyssey's use of the song "Daisy Bell" (Bicycle Built for Two); life imitates art or vice-versa?

Using et al. for a last / senior author rather than for a first author

How to answer "Have you ever been terminated?"

Why are Kinder Surprise Eggs illegal in the USA?

Is pollution the main cause of Notre Dame Cathedral's deterioration?

What's inside the kernel part of virtual memory of 64 bit linux processes?

Is the Standard Deduction better than Itemized when both are the same amount?

porting install scripts : can rpm replace apt?

Why am I getting the error "non-boolean type specified in a context where a condition is expected" for this request?

What LEGO pieces have "real-world" functionality?

Why was the term "discrete" used in discrete logarithm?



How to answer “Have you ever been terminated?”



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How do you develop a solid hiring workflow?Should I mention to have been previously “rejected”?Laid off 3 months into first job out of college. How to present this to prospective employers?Looking for a new job while under contractHow to answer questions about desired salary?Is it appropriate to mention how long you've been applying at the same company?How can I find out whether I have a blot on my HR record?How to handle interview questions about job on which I was unfairly terminated?How to explain why I know the company's employee conditions?Fraudulent job applications with no discernible purpose. Have you ever seen them? Any idea of the motive?



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








11















I'm filling out a job application that asks the question "Have you ever been terminated or asked to resign from a position in the past?"



I did get fired from a job back in 1998. It was my first high-profile tech job after I graduated high school, and I was still very much a smug kid with a crappy work ethic. I antagonized my boss whom I despised, and I naively believed that finding work was pitifully easy since this was the height of the dot-com bubble at the time.



I won't even try to spin this as "not my fault" because it totally was. I'm perfectly comfortable owning up to the mistakes I made because that was over 20 years ago and I was a literal teenager at the time. I've done a lot of growing up since then and I'm a different person now.



On the one hand, I want to be honest and forthright on a job application. On the other hand, HR departments often use this question to immediately reject potential applicants without consideration of the reasons.



I've had a long and successful career since then and I don't feel that being fired an entire lifetime ago is relevant to the position I'm applying for now. I'd be fine with engaging the discussion in an interview if asked, but there is no room in a 400 character text box for that kind of nuance. The job I got fired from isn't on my resume because it was so long ago, and the company doesn't even exist anymore.



I'm looking for work because I've recently been laid off from a job I've had for 10 years due to an acquisition and workforce reduction. It was made clear to me by my former boss and my termination paperwork that the layoff is in no way related to performance or disciplinary reasons. In fact, my most recent performance review was positively stellar. But a layoff is already a small hill I have to climb and I don't want to further taint an application to a potential employer with something that shouldn't even matter anymore.



Is there an acceptable expiration date on such questions? Will I be branded a liar if I answer no?



If I answer yes, how could I explain it succinctly, and do HR departments typically consider those explanations when screening applicants?










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    I wouldn't mention it if there was no paperwork or way to find out about it. It will affect my chances of getting the job.

    – newguy
    5 hours ago







  • 2





    I know we always say to be honest, but sometimes there is a point where too much honesty is in no one's interest. Ignore it.

    – NotMe
    5 hours ago






  • 1





    You gave us two paragraphs describing why you were fired, which is only ~630 characters. I was able to pare that down and add a sentence or two about growing up and receiving a stellar performance review at your 10-year job, and still came in under 400 characters. If you decided to mention this, you should be able to write up something concise for that text box.

    – David K
    5 hours ago












  • finding work was pitifully easy then! :)

    – Fattie
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    Oh no, this is going to be one of those "controversial" questions. Notice mcK's answer already has equal up and down votes.

    – Fattie
    3 hours ago

















11















I'm filling out a job application that asks the question "Have you ever been terminated or asked to resign from a position in the past?"



I did get fired from a job back in 1998. It was my first high-profile tech job after I graduated high school, and I was still very much a smug kid with a crappy work ethic. I antagonized my boss whom I despised, and I naively believed that finding work was pitifully easy since this was the height of the dot-com bubble at the time.



I won't even try to spin this as "not my fault" because it totally was. I'm perfectly comfortable owning up to the mistakes I made because that was over 20 years ago and I was a literal teenager at the time. I've done a lot of growing up since then and I'm a different person now.



On the one hand, I want to be honest and forthright on a job application. On the other hand, HR departments often use this question to immediately reject potential applicants without consideration of the reasons.



I've had a long and successful career since then and I don't feel that being fired an entire lifetime ago is relevant to the position I'm applying for now. I'd be fine with engaging the discussion in an interview if asked, but there is no room in a 400 character text box for that kind of nuance. The job I got fired from isn't on my resume because it was so long ago, and the company doesn't even exist anymore.



I'm looking for work because I've recently been laid off from a job I've had for 10 years due to an acquisition and workforce reduction. It was made clear to me by my former boss and my termination paperwork that the layoff is in no way related to performance or disciplinary reasons. In fact, my most recent performance review was positively stellar. But a layoff is already a small hill I have to climb and I don't want to further taint an application to a potential employer with something that shouldn't even matter anymore.



Is there an acceptable expiration date on such questions? Will I be branded a liar if I answer no?



If I answer yes, how could I explain it succinctly, and do HR departments typically consider those explanations when screening applicants?










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    I wouldn't mention it if there was no paperwork or way to find out about it. It will affect my chances of getting the job.

    – newguy
    5 hours ago







  • 2





    I know we always say to be honest, but sometimes there is a point where too much honesty is in no one's interest. Ignore it.

    – NotMe
    5 hours ago






  • 1





    You gave us two paragraphs describing why you were fired, which is only ~630 characters. I was able to pare that down and add a sentence or two about growing up and receiving a stellar performance review at your 10-year job, and still came in under 400 characters. If you decided to mention this, you should be able to write up something concise for that text box.

    – David K
    5 hours ago












  • finding work was pitifully easy then! :)

    – Fattie
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    Oh no, this is going to be one of those "controversial" questions. Notice mcK's answer already has equal up and down votes.

    – Fattie
    3 hours ago













11












11








11








I'm filling out a job application that asks the question "Have you ever been terminated or asked to resign from a position in the past?"



I did get fired from a job back in 1998. It was my first high-profile tech job after I graduated high school, and I was still very much a smug kid with a crappy work ethic. I antagonized my boss whom I despised, and I naively believed that finding work was pitifully easy since this was the height of the dot-com bubble at the time.



I won't even try to spin this as "not my fault" because it totally was. I'm perfectly comfortable owning up to the mistakes I made because that was over 20 years ago and I was a literal teenager at the time. I've done a lot of growing up since then and I'm a different person now.



On the one hand, I want to be honest and forthright on a job application. On the other hand, HR departments often use this question to immediately reject potential applicants without consideration of the reasons.



I've had a long and successful career since then and I don't feel that being fired an entire lifetime ago is relevant to the position I'm applying for now. I'd be fine with engaging the discussion in an interview if asked, but there is no room in a 400 character text box for that kind of nuance. The job I got fired from isn't on my resume because it was so long ago, and the company doesn't even exist anymore.



I'm looking for work because I've recently been laid off from a job I've had for 10 years due to an acquisition and workforce reduction. It was made clear to me by my former boss and my termination paperwork that the layoff is in no way related to performance or disciplinary reasons. In fact, my most recent performance review was positively stellar. But a layoff is already a small hill I have to climb and I don't want to further taint an application to a potential employer with something that shouldn't even matter anymore.



Is there an acceptable expiration date on such questions? Will I be branded a liar if I answer no?



If I answer yes, how could I explain it succinctly, and do HR departments typically consider those explanations when screening applicants?










share|improve this question
















I'm filling out a job application that asks the question "Have you ever been terminated or asked to resign from a position in the past?"



I did get fired from a job back in 1998. It was my first high-profile tech job after I graduated high school, and I was still very much a smug kid with a crappy work ethic. I antagonized my boss whom I despised, and I naively believed that finding work was pitifully easy since this was the height of the dot-com bubble at the time.



I won't even try to spin this as "not my fault" because it totally was. I'm perfectly comfortable owning up to the mistakes I made because that was over 20 years ago and I was a literal teenager at the time. I've done a lot of growing up since then and I'm a different person now.



On the one hand, I want to be honest and forthright on a job application. On the other hand, HR departments often use this question to immediately reject potential applicants without consideration of the reasons.



I've had a long and successful career since then and I don't feel that being fired an entire lifetime ago is relevant to the position I'm applying for now. I'd be fine with engaging the discussion in an interview if asked, but there is no room in a 400 character text box for that kind of nuance. The job I got fired from isn't on my resume because it was so long ago, and the company doesn't even exist anymore.



I'm looking for work because I've recently been laid off from a job I've had for 10 years due to an acquisition and workforce reduction. It was made clear to me by my former boss and my termination paperwork that the layoff is in no way related to performance or disciplinary reasons. In fact, my most recent performance review was positively stellar. But a layoff is already a small hill I have to climb and I don't want to further taint an application to a potential employer with something that shouldn't even matter anymore.



Is there an acceptable expiration date on such questions? Will I be branded a liar if I answer no?



If I answer yes, how could I explain it succinctly, and do HR departments typically consider those explanations when screening applicants?







interviewing job-search new-job hiring-process human-resources






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 56 mins ago







Wes Sayeed

















asked 5 hours ago









Wes SayeedWes Sayeed

768149




768149







  • 2





    I wouldn't mention it if there was no paperwork or way to find out about it. It will affect my chances of getting the job.

    – newguy
    5 hours ago







  • 2





    I know we always say to be honest, but sometimes there is a point where too much honesty is in no one's interest. Ignore it.

    – NotMe
    5 hours ago






  • 1





    You gave us two paragraphs describing why you were fired, which is only ~630 characters. I was able to pare that down and add a sentence or two about growing up and receiving a stellar performance review at your 10-year job, and still came in under 400 characters. If you decided to mention this, you should be able to write up something concise for that text box.

    – David K
    5 hours ago












  • finding work was pitifully easy then! :)

    – Fattie
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    Oh no, this is going to be one of those "controversial" questions. Notice mcK's answer already has equal up and down votes.

    – Fattie
    3 hours ago












  • 2





    I wouldn't mention it if there was no paperwork or way to find out about it. It will affect my chances of getting the job.

    – newguy
    5 hours ago







  • 2





    I know we always say to be honest, but sometimes there is a point where too much honesty is in no one's interest. Ignore it.

    – NotMe
    5 hours ago






  • 1





    You gave us two paragraphs describing why you were fired, which is only ~630 characters. I was able to pare that down and add a sentence or two about growing up and receiving a stellar performance review at your 10-year job, and still came in under 400 characters. If you decided to mention this, you should be able to write up something concise for that text box.

    – David K
    5 hours ago












  • finding work was pitifully easy then! :)

    – Fattie
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    Oh no, this is going to be one of those "controversial" questions. Notice mcK's answer already has equal up and down votes.

    – Fattie
    3 hours ago







2




2





I wouldn't mention it if there was no paperwork or way to find out about it. It will affect my chances of getting the job.

– newguy
5 hours ago






I wouldn't mention it if there was no paperwork or way to find out about it. It will affect my chances of getting the job.

– newguy
5 hours ago





2




2





I know we always say to be honest, but sometimes there is a point where too much honesty is in no one's interest. Ignore it.

– NotMe
5 hours ago





I know we always say to be honest, but sometimes there is a point where too much honesty is in no one's interest. Ignore it.

– NotMe
5 hours ago




1




1





You gave us two paragraphs describing why you were fired, which is only ~630 characters. I was able to pare that down and add a sentence or two about growing up and receiving a stellar performance review at your 10-year job, and still came in under 400 characters. If you decided to mention this, you should be able to write up something concise for that text box.

– David K
5 hours ago






You gave us two paragraphs describing why you were fired, which is only ~630 characters. I was able to pare that down and add a sentence or two about growing up and receiving a stellar performance review at your 10-year job, and still came in under 400 characters. If you decided to mention this, you should be able to write up something concise for that text box.

– David K
5 hours ago














finding work was pitifully easy then! :)

– Fattie
3 hours ago





finding work was pitifully easy then! :)

– Fattie
3 hours ago




1




1





Oh no, this is going to be one of those "controversial" questions. Notice mcK's answer already has equal up and down votes.

– Fattie
3 hours ago





Oh no, this is going to be one of those "controversial" questions. Notice mcK's answer already has equal up and down votes.

– Fattie
3 hours ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















11














It would be understandable to say no, because there's probably no way anyone would be able to find out or verify you were fired over 20 years ago from a non-existent company.



The problem with saying "no" is that it is not the truth. And not telling the truth seems to bother you, which is not an uncommon response.



This is a personal ethical choice to be sure, but you'll also have to carry around the worry that someone someday will find out.



If this was a question about work history, I would definitely omit that job since it was so long ago, but that's not what the question is asking.



There's no way to say for sure what any particular company's policy is with a question like that. In my experience companies usually take context into consideration. The fact that they provide 400 words for this (as opposed to a simple checkbox) does seem to indicate they are doing so. The company would likely not go through the trouble of handling an application if they blindly rejected anyone who had been terminated.



I would say yes, and also briefly explain that it was 20 years ago, and served as a wake-up call and important learning lesson. You can turn this into a positive.



A company who would reject you based on that answer is probably not one you'd want to work for.






share|improve this answer




















  • 2





    My only reservation about your answer is the last paragraph. Often times employers go through 3rd parties to harvest applications and pre-screen candidates. This job appears on the company's own web site, but the Apply Now button links to a 3rd party HR firm with this company's branding. If the 3rd party system is set up to auto-reject a candidate based on certain checkboxes being checked, I don't think it says anything about the company one way or the other. I just want my application rejected by a human if that is to be the case, not a machine.

    – Wes Sayeed
    3 hours ago











  • And even within a company, the junior HR person who sticks to their checkboxes is not necessarily anyone you would interact with later

    – George M
    1 hour ago











  • "Yes, once back when I was a stupid teenager." – spoken by someone with 20+ years of professional experience, the interviewer may just check "no" on their form if they make the call that it doesn't matter.

    – TehShrike
    1 hour ago












  • @WesSayeed understandable -- a lot of times however, you get jobs through referrals and networking, not through application harvesters. With pre-screened processes you can get flagged for many things, including not having the right acronyms on your resume.

    – mcknz
    1 hour ago











  • "In my experience companies usually take context into consideration" Are you saying that in your experience, hiring managers DO actually read and consider the explanation you provide?

    – Wes Sayeed
    46 mins ago


















2














It’s ethical to be concerned about how to answer it and honestly my first thought was no one will fault you on principle even if it were provable. But as I thought about it, it occurred to me that 400 characters may be the perfect space. Nuance is not for the application process. If you had eight paragraphs to explain, they’d skip you before you reached your conclusion. Application is about not getting weeded out and making an impression. You might even do yourself a favor by answering affirmatively.



By analogy, say you go out for pizza. The order is taken, completed in reasonable time and a good pizza overall. Does that experience stand out over the last dozen times you’ve had pizza? If they burned your pizza, apologized, got your drinks and an appetizer while they did it right and didn’t charge you, are they a bad restaurant or a great one?




Have you ever been terminated or asked to resign from a position in the past?



Yes, once as a teen--and it was one of the single most valuable
lessons of my (early?) career. I’ve since learned my confidence was
not misplaced, but how I interacted with others was forever shaped for
the better on that day.




Ultimately, anything is a gamble. A simple “no” is safe, but leaves you no more intriguing than the other dozen applicants who answered the same. Turning that one, long ago shortcoming into a strength usually doesn’t get to happen until the interview.






share|improve this answer























  • This has a great point - how to turn it into a positive instead of a null.

    – thursdaysgeek
    1 hour ago











  • @thursdaysgeek; That could be true, but only if an actual human reads it and not a robot that sends applications to the automatic "circular file" for certain pre-programmed red flags.

    – Wes Sayeed
    51 mins ago











  • The fact that there's a 400 letter text box suggests that, under ideal circumstances at least, it would be read by a human. It won't necessarily be someone who gives it more than a cursory skim though, so get the important facts in up front.

    – Matthew Barber
    37 mins ago



















0














To expand on mcknz's answer. It seems like there's mainly 2 options




  • Yes, with an attempted brief explanation. As you mentioned, this may immediately disqualify you. And also as you mentioned, it's not
    like an interview where you can be personable.


  • Lie. As bad as it sounds, I'd consider this the best choice. Not only because you won't get caught but simply because something
    like this from 20 years ago is just not relevant.

The choice is now up to you. Can you morally lie on a job application? Different people have different morals. I would have no problem with it.



If it makes you uncomfortable:



  1. Tell the truth

  2. Explain the best that you can

  3. Hope for the best.

Good luck to you :)






share|improve this answer






























    -1














    It's very likely that, in your resume or application you surely don't even list your entire work history (like 25 years worth) but only the last, say, 10 years. Is that right?



    I would say with such a minor piece of ancient history - which is well outside your resume - it would be irrelevant.



    To put in to light just how long ago this was, do you truly even remember anything about the job?



    One person's name, anything? Your desk? The product? Where you had lunch? Anything?



    Is it even the case that you were literally, exactly, and legally "terminated"? Do you have any paperwork or evidence to prove that you were terminated? Were you perhaps asked to leave (was the word "terminated" even used then? People used to just get "fired" or "sacked"!) Can you even remember the full circumstances, paperwork, procedue and anything about the events?



    After long periods of time, five or more years, we generally don't have memories, we just "remember remembering" something. It just becomes "a story".



    Say (for some reason) someone challenged you if you were actually "terminated". (
    "You just claimed you were terminated to appear cool!")



    Could you present the slightest evidence that you were literally terminated?




    Is there an acceptable expiration date on such questions?




    The length of the content of your resume; 15 years anyway.




    Will I be branded a liar if I answer no?




    Simply, No you will not.



    You had a part-time job as a teenager and it didn't work out after a couple weeks. It would be .. grandiose .. to describe it as "terminated!"




    If I answer yes, how could I explain it succinctly, and do HR departments typically consider those explanations when screening applicants?




    It's utterly impossible to "explain" it in either way.



    It's a yes/no question. There's no "explaining" such things.






    share|improve this answer

























    • The answer to all of your questions is yes. I remember the job, the names of my coworkers, even the address of the building, and I'm sure I still have my termination paperwork in an old box somewhere. It was not a part-time job. It was a 40-hour, full-time position that I basically pissed away. Also, I was 19.

      – Wes Sayeed
      3 hours ago







    • 1





      Hey Wes - My God, that's amazing, I was drunk that entire decade :) Well: you can take my advice as general. The short answer then to your question - it can only be one man's opinion - is that it's far too long ago and too minor to mention in the context. (I'd just be annoyed if I had to read something like that - you know?) One man's take! Good luck!!!

      – Fattie
      3 hours ago












    • More to the point, is there any reason to include this job in your resume if it was 20 years ago? Did you do anything so staggeringly original that you risk not being hired because they don't realize you're the author of the famous ---? Then you should leave the entire job off. There, no more need to worry about that box

      – George M
      1 hour ago











    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "423"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: false,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f134048%2fhow-to-answer-have-you-ever-been-terminated%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown




















    StackExchange.ready(function ()
    $("#show-editor-button input, #show-editor-button button").click(function ()
    var showEditor = function()
    $("#show-editor-button").hide();
    $("#post-form").removeClass("dno");
    StackExchange.editor.finallyInit();
    ;

    var useFancy = $(this).data('confirm-use-fancy');
    if(useFancy == 'True')
    var popupTitle = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-title');
    var popupBody = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-body');
    var popupAccept = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-accept-button');

    $(this).loadPopup(
    url: '/post/self-answer-popup',
    loaded: function(popup)
    var pTitle = $(popup).find('h2');
    var pBody = $(popup).find('.popup-body');
    var pSubmit = $(popup).find('.popup-submit');

    pTitle.text(popupTitle);
    pBody.html(popupBody);
    pSubmit.val(popupAccept).click(showEditor);

    )
    else
    var confirmText = $(this).data('confirm-text');
    if (confirmText ? confirm(confirmText) : true)
    showEditor();


    );
    );






    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    11














    It would be understandable to say no, because there's probably no way anyone would be able to find out or verify you were fired over 20 years ago from a non-existent company.



    The problem with saying "no" is that it is not the truth. And not telling the truth seems to bother you, which is not an uncommon response.



    This is a personal ethical choice to be sure, but you'll also have to carry around the worry that someone someday will find out.



    If this was a question about work history, I would definitely omit that job since it was so long ago, but that's not what the question is asking.



    There's no way to say for sure what any particular company's policy is with a question like that. In my experience companies usually take context into consideration. The fact that they provide 400 words for this (as opposed to a simple checkbox) does seem to indicate they are doing so. The company would likely not go through the trouble of handling an application if they blindly rejected anyone who had been terminated.



    I would say yes, and also briefly explain that it was 20 years ago, and served as a wake-up call and important learning lesson. You can turn this into a positive.



    A company who would reject you based on that answer is probably not one you'd want to work for.






    share|improve this answer




















    • 2





      My only reservation about your answer is the last paragraph. Often times employers go through 3rd parties to harvest applications and pre-screen candidates. This job appears on the company's own web site, but the Apply Now button links to a 3rd party HR firm with this company's branding. If the 3rd party system is set up to auto-reject a candidate based on certain checkboxes being checked, I don't think it says anything about the company one way or the other. I just want my application rejected by a human if that is to be the case, not a machine.

      – Wes Sayeed
      3 hours ago











    • And even within a company, the junior HR person who sticks to their checkboxes is not necessarily anyone you would interact with later

      – George M
      1 hour ago











    • "Yes, once back when I was a stupid teenager." – spoken by someone with 20+ years of professional experience, the interviewer may just check "no" on their form if they make the call that it doesn't matter.

      – TehShrike
      1 hour ago












    • @WesSayeed understandable -- a lot of times however, you get jobs through referrals and networking, not through application harvesters. With pre-screened processes you can get flagged for many things, including not having the right acronyms on your resume.

      – mcknz
      1 hour ago











    • "In my experience companies usually take context into consideration" Are you saying that in your experience, hiring managers DO actually read and consider the explanation you provide?

      – Wes Sayeed
      46 mins ago















    11














    It would be understandable to say no, because there's probably no way anyone would be able to find out or verify you were fired over 20 years ago from a non-existent company.



    The problem with saying "no" is that it is not the truth. And not telling the truth seems to bother you, which is not an uncommon response.



    This is a personal ethical choice to be sure, but you'll also have to carry around the worry that someone someday will find out.



    If this was a question about work history, I would definitely omit that job since it was so long ago, but that's not what the question is asking.



    There's no way to say for sure what any particular company's policy is with a question like that. In my experience companies usually take context into consideration. The fact that they provide 400 words for this (as opposed to a simple checkbox) does seem to indicate they are doing so. The company would likely not go through the trouble of handling an application if they blindly rejected anyone who had been terminated.



    I would say yes, and also briefly explain that it was 20 years ago, and served as a wake-up call and important learning lesson. You can turn this into a positive.



    A company who would reject you based on that answer is probably not one you'd want to work for.






    share|improve this answer




















    • 2





      My only reservation about your answer is the last paragraph. Often times employers go through 3rd parties to harvest applications and pre-screen candidates. This job appears on the company's own web site, but the Apply Now button links to a 3rd party HR firm with this company's branding. If the 3rd party system is set up to auto-reject a candidate based on certain checkboxes being checked, I don't think it says anything about the company one way or the other. I just want my application rejected by a human if that is to be the case, not a machine.

      – Wes Sayeed
      3 hours ago











    • And even within a company, the junior HR person who sticks to their checkboxes is not necessarily anyone you would interact with later

      – George M
      1 hour ago











    • "Yes, once back when I was a stupid teenager." – spoken by someone with 20+ years of professional experience, the interviewer may just check "no" on their form if they make the call that it doesn't matter.

      – TehShrike
      1 hour ago












    • @WesSayeed understandable -- a lot of times however, you get jobs through referrals and networking, not through application harvesters. With pre-screened processes you can get flagged for many things, including not having the right acronyms on your resume.

      – mcknz
      1 hour ago











    • "In my experience companies usually take context into consideration" Are you saying that in your experience, hiring managers DO actually read and consider the explanation you provide?

      – Wes Sayeed
      46 mins ago













    11












    11








    11







    It would be understandable to say no, because there's probably no way anyone would be able to find out or verify you were fired over 20 years ago from a non-existent company.



    The problem with saying "no" is that it is not the truth. And not telling the truth seems to bother you, which is not an uncommon response.



    This is a personal ethical choice to be sure, but you'll also have to carry around the worry that someone someday will find out.



    If this was a question about work history, I would definitely omit that job since it was so long ago, but that's not what the question is asking.



    There's no way to say for sure what any particular company's policy is with a question like that. In my experience companies usually take context into consideration. The fact that they provide 400 words for this (as opposed to a simple checkbox) does seem to indicate they are doing so. The company would likely not go through the trouble of handling an application if they blindly rejected anyone who had been terminated.



    I would say yes, and also briefly explain that it was 20 years ago, and served as a wake-up call and important learning lesson. You can turn this into a positive.



    A company who would reject you based on that answer is probably not one you'd want to work for.






    share|improve this answer















    It would be understandable to say no, because there's probably no way anyone would be able to find out or verify you were fired over 20 years ago from a non-existent company.



    The problem with saying "no" is that it is not the truth. And not telling the truth seems to bother you, which is not an uncommon response.



    This is a personal ethical choice to be sure, but you'll also have to carry around the worry that someone someday will find out.



    If this was a question about work history, I would definitely omit that job since it was so long ago, but that's not what the question is asking.



    There's no way to say for sure what any particular company's policy is with a question like that. In my experience companies usually take context into consideration. The fact that they provide 400 words for this (as opposed to a simple checkbox) does seem to indicate they are doing so. The company would likely not go through the trouble of handling an application if they blindly rejected anyone who had been terminated.



    I would say yes, and also briefly explain that it was 20 years ago, and served as a wake-up call and important learning lesson. You can turn this into a positive.



    A company who would reject you based on that answer is probably not one you'd want to work for.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 7 mins ago

























    answered 5 hours ago









    mcknzmcknz

    19.5k86380




    19.5k86380







    • 2





      My only reservation about your answer is the last paragraph. Often times employers go through 3rd parties to harvest applications and pre-screen candidates. This job appears on the company's own web site, but the Apply Now button links to a 3rd party HR firm with this company's branding. If the 3rd party system is set up to auto-reject a candidate based on certain checkboxes being checked, I don't think it says anything about the company one way or the other. I just want my application rejected by a human if that is to be the case, not a machine.

      – Wes Sayeed
      3 hours ago











    • And even within a company, the junior HR person who sticks to their checkboxes is not necessarily anyone you would interact with later

      – George M
      1 hour ago











    • "Yes, once back when I was a stupid teenager." – spoken by someone with 20+ years of professional experience, the interviewer may just check "no" on their form if they make the call that it doesn't matter.

      – TehShrike
      1 hour ago












    • @WesSayeed understandable -- a lot of times however, you get jobs through referrals and networking, not through application harvesters. With pre-screened processes you can get flagged for many things, including not having the right acronyms on your resume.

      – mcknz
      1 hour ago











    • "In my experience companies usually take context into consideration" Are you saying that in your experience, hiring managers DO actually read and consider the explanation you provide?

      – Wes Sayeed
      46 mins ago












    • 2





      My only reservation about your answer is the last paragraph. Often times employers go through 3rd parties to harvest applications and pre-screen candidates. This job appears on the company's own web site, but the Apply Now button links to a 3rd party HR firm with this company's branding. If the 3rd party system is set up to auto-reject a candidate based on certain checkboxes being checked, I don't think it says anything about the company one way or the other. I just want my application rejected by a human if that is to be the case, not a machine.

      – Wes Sayeed
      3 hours ago











    • And even within a company, the junior HR person who sticks to their checkboxes is not necessarily anyone you would interact with later

      – George M
      1 hour ago











    • "Yes, once back when I was a stupid teenager." – spoken by someone with 20+ years of professional experience, the interviewer may just check "no" on their form if they make the call that it doesn't matter.

      – TehShrike
      1 hour ago












    • @WesSayeed understandable -- a lot of times however, you get jobs through referrals and networking, not through application harvesters. With pre-screened processes you can get flagged for many things, including not having the right acronyms on your resume.

      – mcknz
      1 hour ago











    • "In my experience companies usually take context into consideration" Are you saying that in your experience, hiring managers DO actually read and consider the explanation you provide?

      – Wes Sayeed
      46 mins ago







    2




    2





    My only reservation about your answer is the last paragraph. Often times employers go through 3rd parties to harvest applications and pre-screen candidates. This job appears on the company's own web site, but the Apply Now button links to a 3rd party HR firm with this company's branding. If the 3rd party system is set up to auto-reject a candidate based on certain checkboxes being checked, I don't think it says anything about the company one way or the other. I just want my application rejected by a human if that is to be the case, not a machine.

    – Wes Sayeed
    3 hours ago





    My only reservation about your answer is the last paragraph. Often times employers go through 3rd parties to harvest applications and pre-screen candidates. This job appears on the company's own web site, but the Apply Now button links to a 3rd party HR firm with this company's branding. If the 3rd party system is set up to auto-reject a candidate based on certain checkboxes being checked, I don't think it says anything about the company one way or the other. I just want my application rejected by a human if that is to be the case, not a machine.

    – Wes Sayeed
    3 hours ago













    And even within a company, the junior HR person who sticks to their checkboxes is not necessarily anyone you would interact with later

    – George M
    1 hour ago





    And even within a company, the junior HR person who sticks to their checkboxes is not necessarily anyone you would interact with later

    – George M
    1 hour ago













    "Yes, once back when I was a stupid teenager." – spoken by someone with 20+ years of professional experience, the interviewer may just check "no" on their form if they make the call that it doesn't matter.

    – TehShrike
    1 hour ago






    "Yes, once back when I was a stupid teenager." – spoken by someone with 20+ years of professional experience, the interviewer may just check "no" on their form if they make the call that it doesn't matter.

    – TehShrike
    1 hour ago














    @WesSayeed understandable -- a lot of times however, you get jobs through referrals and networking, not through application harvesters. With pre-screened processes you can get flagged for many things, including not having the right acronyms on your resume.

    – mcknz
    1 hour ago





    @WesSayeed understandable -- a lot of times however, you get jobs through referrals and networking, not through application harvesters. With pre-screened processes you can get flagged for many things, including not having the right acronyms on your resume.

    – mcknz
    1 hour ago













    "In my experience companies usually take context into consideration" Are you saying that in your experience, hiring managers DO actually read and consider the explanation you provide?

    – Wes Sayeed
    46 mins ago





    "In my experience companies usually take context into consideration" Are you saying that in your experience, hiring managers DO actually read and consider the explanation you provide?

    – Wes Sayeed
    46 mins ago













    2














    It’s ethical to be concerned about how to answer it and honestly my first thought was no one will fault you on principle even if it were provable. But as I thought about it, it occurred to me that 400 characters may be the perfect space. Nuance is not for the application process. If you had eight paragraphs to explain, they’d skip you before you reached your conclusion. Application is about not getting weeded out and making an impression. You might even do yourself a favor by answering affirmatively.



    By analogy, say you go out for pizza. The order is taken, completed in reasonable time and a good pizza overall. Does that experience stand out over the last dozen times you’ve had pizza? If they burned your pizza, apologized, got your drinks and an appetizer while they did it right and didn’t charge you, are they a bad restaurant or a great one?




    Have you ever been terminated or asked to resign from a position in the past?



    Yes, once as a teen--and it was one of the single most valuable
    lessons of my (early?) career. I’ve since learned my confidence was
    not misplaced, but how I interacted with others was forever shaped for
    the better on that day.




    Ultimately, anything is a gamble. A simple “no” is safe, but leaves you no more intriguing than the other dozen applicants who answered the same. Turning that one, long ago shortcoming into a strength usually doesn’t get to happen until the interview.






    share|improve this answer























    • This has a great point - how to turn it into a positive instead of a null.

      – thursdaysgeek
      1 hour ago











    • @thursdaysgeek; That could be true, but only if an actual human reads it and not a robot that sends applications to the automatic "circular file" for certain pre-programmed red flags.

      – Wes Sayeed
      51 mins ago











    • The fact that there's a 400 letter text box suggests that, under ideal circumstances at least, it would be read by a human. It won't necessarily be someone who gives it more than a cursory skim though, so get the important facts in up front.

      – Matthew Barber
      37 mins ago
















    2














    It’s ethical to be concerned about how to answer it and honestly my first thought was no one will fault you on principle even if it were provable. But as I thought about it, it occurred to me that 400 characters may be the perfect space. Nuance is not for the application process. If you had eight paragraphs to explain, they’d skip you before you reached your conclusion. Application is about not getting weeded out and making an impression. You might even do yourself a favor by answering affirmatively.



    By analogy, say you go out for pizza. The order is taken, completed in reasonable time and a good pizza overall. Does that experience stand out over the last dozen times you’ve had pizza? If they burned your pizza, apologized, got your drinks and an appetizer while they did it right and didn’t charge you, are they a bad restaurant or a great one?




    Have you ever been terminated or asked to resign from a position in the past?



    Yes, once as a teen--and it was one of the single most valuable
    lessons of my (early?) career. I’ve since learned my confidence was
    not misplaced, but how I interacted with others was forever shaped for
    the better on that day.




    Ultimately, anything is a gamble. A simple “no” is safe, but leaves you no more intriguing than the other dozen applicants who answered the same. Turning that one, long ago shortcoming into a strength usually doesn’t get to happen until the interview.






    share|improve this answer























    • This has a great point - how to turn it into a positive instead of a null.

      – thursdaysgeek
      1 hour ago











    • @thursdaysgeek; That could be true, but only if an actual human reads it and not a robot that sends applications to the automatic "circular file" for certain pre-programmed red flags.

      – Wes Sayeed
      51 mins ago











    • The fact that there's a 400 letter text box suggests that, under ideal circumstances at least, it would be read by a human. It won't necessarily be someone who gives it more than a cursory skim though, so get the important facts in up front.

      – Matthew Barber
      37 mins ago














    2












    2








    2







    It’s ethical to be concerned about how to answer it and honestly my first thought was no one will fault you on principle even if it were provable. But as I thought about it, it occurred to me that 400 characters may be the perfect space. Nuance is not for the application process. If you had eight paragraphs to explain, they’d skip you before you reached your conclusion. Application is about not getting weeded out and making an impression. You might even do yourself a favor by answering affirmatively.



    By analogy, say you go out for pizza. The order is taken, completed in reasonable time and a good pizza overall. Does that experience stand out over the last dozen times you’ve had pizza? If they burned your pizza, apologized, got your drinks and an appetizer while they did it right and didn’t charge you, are they a bad restaurant or a great one?




    Have you ever been terminated or asked to resign from a position in the past?



    Yes, once as a teen--and it was one of the single most valuable
    lessons of my (early?) career. I’ve since learned my confidence was
    not misplaced, but how I interacted with others was forever shaped for
    the better on that day.




    Ultimately, anything is a gamble. A simple “no” is safe, but leaves you no more intriguing than the other dozen applicants who answered the same. Turning that one, long ago shortcoming into a strength usually doesn’t get to happen until the interview.






    share|improve this answer













    It’s ethical to be concerned about how to answer it and honestly my first thought was no one will fault you on principle even if it were provable. But as I thought about it, it occurred to me that 400 characters may be the perfect space. Nuance is not for the application process. If you had eight paragraphs to explain, they’d skip you before you reached your conclusion. Application is about not getting weeded out and making an impression. You might even do yourself a favor by answering affirmatively.



    By analogy, say you go out for pizza. The order is taken, completed in reasonable time and a good pizza overall. Does that experience stand out over the last dozen times you’ve had pizza? If they burned your pizza, apologized, got your drinks and an appetizer while they did it right and didn’t charge you, are they a bad restaurant or a great one?




    Have you ever been terminated or asked to resign from a position in the past?



    Yes, once as a teen--and it was one of the single most valuable
    lessons of my (early?) career. I’ve since learned my confidence was
    not misplaced, but how I interacted with others was forever shaped for
    the better on that day.




    Ultimately, anything is a gamble. A simple “no” is safe, but leaves you no more intriguing than the other dozen applicants who answered the same. Turning that one, long ago shortcoming into a strength usually doesn’t get to happen until the interview.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 2 hours ago









    John SpiegelJohn Spiegel

    1,16729




    1,16729












    • This has a great point - how to turn it into a positive instead of a null.

      – thursdaysgeek
      1 hour ago











    • @thursdaysgeek; That could be true, but only if an actual human reads it and not a robot that sends applications to the automatic "circular file" for certain pre-programmed red flags.

      – Wes Sayeed
      51 mins ago











    • The fact that there's a 400 letter text box suggests that, under ideal circumstances at least, it would be read by a human. It won't necessarily be someone who gives it more than a cursory skim though, so get the important facts in up front.

      – Matthew Barber
      37 mins ago


















    • This has a great point - how to turn it into a positive instead of a null.

      – thursdaysgeek
      1 hour ago











    • @thursdaysgeek; That could be true, but only if an actual human reads it and not a robot that sends applications to the automatic "circular file" for certain pre-programmed red flags.

      – Wes Sayeed
      51 mins ago











    • The fact that there's a 400 letter text box suggests that, under ideal circumstances at least, it would be read by a human. It won't necessarily be someone who gives it more than a cursory skim though, so get the important facts in up front.

      – Matthew Barber
      37 mins ago

















    This has a great point - how to turn it into a positive instead of a null.

    – thursdaysgeek
    1 hour ago





    This has a great point - how to turn it into a positive instead of a null.

    – thursdaysgeek
    1 hour ago













    @thursdaysgeek; That could be true, but only if an actual human reads it and not a robot that sends applications to the automatic "circular file" for certain pre-programmed red flags.

    – Wes Sayeed
    51 mins ago





    @thursdaysgeek; That could be true, but only if an actual human reads it and not a robot that sends applications to the automatic "circular file" for certain pre-programmed red flags.

    – Wes Sayeed
    51 mins ago













    The fact that there's a 400 letter text box suggests that, under ideal circumstances at least, it would be read by a human. It won't necessarily be someone who gives it more than a cursory skim though, so get the important facts in up front.

    – Matthew Barber
    37 mins ago






    The fact that there's a 400 letter text box suggests that, under ideal circumstances at least, it would be read by a human. It won't necessarily be someone who gives it more than a cursory skim though, so get the important facts in up front.

    – Matthew Barber
    37 mins ago












    0














    To expand on mcknz's answer. It seems like there's mainly 2 options




    • Yes, with an attempted brief explanation. As you mentioned, this may immediately disqualify you. And also as you mentioned, it's not
      like an interview where you can be personable.


    • Lie. As bad as it sounds, I'd consider this the best choice. Not only because you won't get caught but simply because something
      like this from 20 years ago is just not relevant.

    The choice is now up to you. Can you morally lie on a job application? Different people have different morals. I would have no problem with it.



    If it makes you uncomfortable:



    1. Tell the truth

    2. Explain the best that you can

    3. Hope for the best.

    Good luck to you :)






    share|improve this answer



























      0














      To expand on mcknz's answer. It seems like there's mainly 2 options




      • Yes, with an attempted brief explanation. As you mentioned, this may immediately disqualify you. And also as you mentioned, it's not
        like an interview where you can be personable.


      • Lie. As bad as it sounds, I'd consider this the best choice. Not only because you won't get caught but simply because something
        like this from 20 years ago is just not relevant.

      The choice is now up to you. Can you morally lie on a job application? Different people have different morals. I would have no problem with it.



      If it makes you uncomfortable:



      1. Tell the truth

      2. Explain the best that you can

      3. Hope for the best.

      Good luck to you :)






      share|improve this answer

























        0












        0








        0







        To expand on mcknz's answer. It seems like there's mainly 2 options




        • Yes, with an attempted brief explanation. As you mentioned, this may immediately disqualify you. And also as you mentioned, it's not
          like an interview where you can be personable.


        • Lie. As bad as it sounds, I'd consider this the best choice. Not only because you won't get caught but simply because something
          like this from 20 years ago is just not relevant.

        The choice is now up to you. Can you morally lie on a job application? Different people have different morals. I would have no problem with it.



        If it makes you uncomfortable:



        1. Tell the truth

        2. Explain the best that you can

        3. Hope for the best.

        Good luck to you :)






        share|improve this answer













        To expand on mcknz's answer. It seems like there's mainly 2 options




        • Yes, with an attempted brief explanation. As you mentioned, this may immediately disqualify you. And also as you mentioned, it's not
          like an interview where you can be personable.


        • Lie. As bad as it sounds, I'd consider this the best choice. Not only because you won't get caught but simply because something
          like this from 20 years ago is just not relevant.

        The choice is now up to you. Can you morally lie on a job application? Different people have different morals. I would have no problem with it.



        If it makes you uncomfortable:



        1. Tell the truth

        2. Explain the best that you can

        3. Hope for the best.

        Good luck to you :)







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 2 hours ago









        CrazyPasteCrazyPaste

        54729




        54729





















            -1














            It's very likely that, in your resume or application you surely don't even list your entire work history (like 25 years worth) but only the last, say, 10 years. Is that right?



            I would say with such a minor piece of ancient history - which is well outside your resume - it would be irrelevant.



            To put in to light just how long ago this was, do you truly even remember anything about the job?



            One person's name, anything? Your desk? The product? Where you had lunch? Anything?



            Is it even the case that you were literally, exactly, and legally "terminated"? Do you have any paperwork or evidence to prove that you were terminated? Were you perhaps asked to leave (was the word "terminated" even used then? People used to just get "fired" or "sacked"!) Can you even remember the full circumstances, paperwork, procedue and anything about the events?



            After long periods of time, five or more years, we generally don't have memories, we just "remember remembering" something. It just becomes "a story".



            Say (for some reason) someone challenged you if you were actually "terminated". (
            "You just claimed you were terminated to appear cool!")



            Could you present the slightest evidence that you were literally terminated?




            Is there an acceptable expiration date on such questions?




            The length of the content of your resume; 15 years anyway.




            Will I be branded a liar if I answer no?




            Simply, No you will not.



            You had a part-time job as a teenager and it didn't work out after a couple weeks. It would be .. grandiose .. to describe it as "terminated!"




            If I answer yes, how could I explain it succinctly, and do HR departments typically consider those explanations when screening applicants?




            It's utterly impossible to "explain" it in either way.



            It's a yes/no question. There's no "explaining" such things.






            share|improve this answer

























            • The answer to all of your questions is yes. I remember the job, the names of my coworkers, even the address of the building, and I'm sure I still have my termination paperwork in an old box somewhere. It was not a part-time job. It was a 40-hour, full-time position that I basically pissed away. Also, I was 19.

              – Wes Sayeed
              3 hours ago







            • 1





              Hey Wes - My God, that's amazing, I was drunk that entire decade :) Well: you can take my advice as general. The short answer then to your question - it can only be one man's opinion - is that it's far too long ago and too minor to mention in the context. (I'd just be annoyed if I had to read something like that - you know?) One man's take! Good luck!!!

              – Fattie
              3 hours ago












            • More to the point, is there any reason to include this job in your resume if it was 20 years ago? Did you do anything so staggeringly original that you risk not being hired because they don't realize you're the author of the famous ---? Then you should leave the entire job off. There, no more need to worry about that box

              – George M
              1 hour ago















            -1














            It's very likely that, in your resume or application you surely don't even list your entire work history (like 25 years worth) but only the last, say, 10 years. Is that right?



            I would say with such a minor piece of ancient history - which is well outside your resume - it would be irrelevant.



            To put in to light just how long ago this was, do you truly even remember anything about the job?



            One person's name, anything? Your desk? The product? Where you had lunch? Anything?



            Is it even the case that you were literally, exactly, and legally "terminated"? Do you have any paperwork or evidence to prove that you were terminated? Were you perhaps asked to leave (was the word "terminated" even used then? People used to just get "fired" or "sacked"!) Can you even remember the full circumstances, paperwork, procedue and anything about the events?



            After long periods of time, five or more years, we generally don't have memories, we just "remember remembering" something. It just becomes "a story".



            Say (for some reason) someone challenged you if you were actually "terminated". (
            "You just claimed you were terminated to appear cool!")



            Could you present the slightest evidence that you were literally terminated?




            Is there an acceptable expiration date on such questions?




            The length of the content of your resume; 15 years anyway.




            Will I be branded a liar if I answer no?




            Simply, No you will not.



            You had a part-time job as a teenager and it didn't work out after a couple weeks. It would be .. grandiose .. to describe it as "terminated!"




            If I answer yes, how could I explain it succinctly, and do HR departments typically consider those explanations when screening applicants?




            It's utterly impossible to "explain" it in either way.



            It's a yes/no question. There's no "explaining" such things.






            share|improve this answer

























            • The answer to all of your questions is yes. I remember the job, the names of my coworkers, even the address of the building, and I'm sure I still have my termination paperwork in an old box somewhere. It was not a part-time job. It was a 40-hour, full-time position that I basically pissed away. Also, I was 19.

              – Wes Sayeed
              3 hours ago







            • 1





              Hey Wes - My God, that's amazing, I was drunk that entire decade :) Well: you can take my advice as general. The short answer then to your question - it can only be one man's opinion - is that it's far too long ago and too minor to mention in the context. (I'd just be annoyed if I had to read something like that - you know?) One man's take! Good luck!!!

              – Fattie
              3 hours ago












            • More to the point, is there any reason to include this job in your resume if it was 20 years ago? Did you do anything so staggeringly original that you risk not being hired because they don't realize you're the author of the famous ---? Then you should leave the entire job off. There, no more need to worry about that box

              – George M
              1 hour ago













            -1












            -1








            -1







            It's very likely that, in your resume or application you surely don't even list your entire work history (like 25 years worth) but only the last, say, 10 years. Is that right?



            I would say with such a minor piece of ancient history - which is well outside your resume - it would be irrelevant.



            To put in to light just how long ago this was, do you truly even remember anything about the job?



            One person's name, anything? Your desk? The product? Where you had lunch? Anything?



            Is it even the case that you were literally, exactly, and legally "terminated"? Do you have any paperwork or evidence to prove that you were terminated? Were you perhaps asked to leave (was the word "terminated" even used then? People used to just get "fired" or "sacked"!) Can you even remember the full circumstances, paperwork, procedue and anything about the events?



            After long periods of time, five or more years, we generally don't have memories, we just "remember remembering" something. It just becomes "a story".



            Say (for some reason) someone challenged you if you were actually "terminated". (
            "You just claimed you were terminated to appear cool!")



            Could you present the slightest evidence that you were literally terminated?




            Is there an acceptable expiration date on such questions?




            The length of the content of your resume; 15 years anyway.




            Will I be branded a liar if I answer no?




            Simply, No you will not.



            You had a part-time job as a teenager and it didn't work out after a couple weeks. It would be .. grandiose .. to describe it as "terminated!"




            If I answer yes, how could I explain it succinctly, and do HR departments typically consider those explanations when screening applicants?




            It's utterly impossible to "explain" it in either way.



            It's a yes/no question. There's no "explaining" such things.






            share|improve this answer















            It's very likely that, in your resume or application you surely don't even list your entire work history (like 25 years worth) but only the last, say, 10 years. Is that right?



            I would say with such a minor piece of ancient history - which is well outside your resume - it would be irrelevant.



            To put in to light just how long ago this was, do you truly even remember anything about the job?



            One person's name, anything? Your desk? The product? Where you had lunch? Anything?



            Is it even the case that you were literally, exactly, and legally "terminated"? Do you have any paperwork or evidence to prove that you were terminated? Were you perhaps asked to leave (was the word "terminated" even used then? People used to just get "fired" or "sacked"!) Can you even remember the full circumstances, paperwork, procedue and anything about the events?



            After long periods of time, five or more years, we generally don't have memories, we just "remember remembering" something. It just becomes "a story".



            Say (for some reason) someone challenged you if you were actually "terminated". (
            "You just claimed you were terminated to appear cool!")



            Could you present the slightest evidence that you were literally terminated?




            Is there an acceptable expiration date on such questions?




            The length of the content of your resume; 15 years anyway.




            Will I be branded a liar if I answer no?




            Simply, No you will not.



            You had a part-time job as a teenager and it didn't work out after a couple weeks. It would be .. grandiose .. to describe it as "terminated!"




            If I answer yes, how could I explain it succinctly, and do HR departments typically consider those explanations when screening applicants?




            It's utterly impossible to "explain" it in either way.



            It's a yes/no question. There's no "explaining" such things.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 3 hours ago

























            answered 3 hours ago









            FattieFattie

            14.3k62545




            14.3k62545












            • The answer to all of your questions is yes. I remember the job, the names of my coworkers, even the address of the building, and I'm sure I still have my termination paperwork in an old box somewhere. It was not a part-time job. It was a 40-hour, full-time position that I basically pissed away. Also, I was 19.

              – Wes Sayeed
              3 hours ago







            • 1





              Hey Wes - My God, that's amazing, I was drunk that entire decade :) Well: you can take my advice as general. The short answer then to your question - it can only be one man's opinion - is that it's far too long ago and too minor to mention in the context. (I'd just be annoyed if I had to read something like that - you know?) One man's take! Good luck!!!

              – Fattie
              3 hours ago












            • More to the point, is there any reason to include this job in your resume if it was 20 years ago? Did you do anything so staggeringly original that you risk not being hired because they don't realize you're the author of the famous ---? Then you should leave the entire job off. There, no more need to worry about that box

              – George M
              1 hour ago

















            • The answer to all of your questions is yes. I remember the job, the names of my coworkers, even the address of the building, and I'm sure I still have my termination paperwork in an old box somewhere. It was not a part-time job. It was a 40-hour, full-time position that I basically pissed away. Also, I was 19.

              – Wes Sayeed
              3 hours ago







            • 1





              Hey Wes - My God, that's amazing, I was drunk that entire decade :) Well: you can take my advice as general. The short answer then to your question - it can only be one man's opinion - is that it's far too long ago and too minor to mention in the context. (I'd just be annoyed if I had to read something like that - you know?) One man's take! Good luck!!!

              – Fattie
              3 hours ago












            • More to the point, is there any reason to include this job in your resume if it was 20 years ago? Did you do anything so staggeringly original that you risk not being hired because they don't realize you're the author of the famous ---? Then you should leave the entire job off. There, no more need to worry about that box

              – George M
              1 hour ago
















            The answer to all of your questions is yes. I remember the job, the names of my coworkers, even the address of the building, and I'm sure I still have my termination paperwork in an old box somewhere. It was not a part-time job. It was a 40-hour, full-time position that I basically pissed away. Also, I was 19.

            – Wes Sayeed
            3 hours ago






            The answer to all of your questions is yes. I remember the job, the names of my coworkers, even the address of the building, and I'm sure I still have my termination paperwork in an old box somewhere. It was not a part-time job. It was a 40-hour, full-time position that I basically pissed away. Also, I was 19.

            – Wes Sayeed
            3 hours ago





            1




            1





            Hey Wes - My God, that's amazing, I was drunk that entire decade :) Well: you can take my advice as general. The short answer then to your question - it can only be one man's opinion - is that it's far too long ago and too minor to mention in the context. (I'd just be annoyed if I had to read something like that - you know?) One man's take! Good luck!!!

            – Fattie
            3 hours ago






            Hey Wes - My God, that's amazing, I was drunk that entire decade :) Well: you can take my advice as general. The short answer then to your question - it can only be one man's opinion - is that it's far too long ago and too minor to mention in the context. (I'd just be annoyed if I had to read something like that - you know?) One man's take! Good luck!!!

            – Fattie
            3 hours ago














            More to the point, is there any reason to include this job in your resume if it was 20 years ago? Did you do anything so staggeringly original that you risk not being hired because they don't realize you're the author of the famous ---? Then you should leave the entire job off. There, no more need to worry about that box

            – George M
            1 hour ago





            More to the point, is there any reason to include this job in your resume if it was 20 years ago? Did you do anything so staggeringly original that you risk not being hired because they don't realize you're the author of the famous ---? Then you should leave the entire job off. There, no more need to worry about that box

            – George M
            1 hour ago

















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to The Workplace Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f134048%2fhow-to-answer-have-you-ever-been-terminated%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown











            Popular posts from this blog

            Reverse int within the 32-bit signed integer range: [−2^31, 2^31 − 1]Combining two 32-bit integers into one 64-bit integerDetermine if an int is within rangeLossy packing 32 bit integer to 16 bitComputing the square root of a 64-bit integerKeeping integer addition within boundsSafe multiplication of two 64-bit signed integersLeetcode 10: Regular Expression MatchingSigned integer-to-ascii x86_64 assembler macroReverse the digits of an Integer“Add two numbers given in reverse order from a linked list”

            Category:Fedor von Bock Media in category "Fedor von Bock"Navigation menuUpload mediaISNI: 0000 0000 5511 3417VIAF ID: 24712551GND ID: 119294796Library of Congress authority ID: n96068363BnF ID: 12534305fSUDOC authorities ID: 034604189Open Library ID: OL338253ANKCR AUT ID: jn19990000869National Library of Israel ID: 000514068National Thesaurus for Author Names ID: 341574317ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

            Kiel Indholdsfortegnelse Historie | Transport og færgeforbindelser | Sejlsport og anden sport | Kultur | Kendte personer fra Kiel | Noter | Litteratur | Eksterne henvisninger | Navigationsmenuwww.kiel.de54°19′31″N 10°8′26″Ø / 54.32528°N 10.14056°Ø / 54.32528; 10.14056Oberbürgermeister Dr. Ulf Kämpferwww.statistik-nord.deDen danske Stats StatistikKiels hjemmesiderrrWorldCat312794080n790547494030481-4