How do I avoid eval and parse? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowAvoiding the infamous “eval(parse())” constructR: eval(parse(…)) is often suboptimalWhy is using the JavaScript eval function a bad idea?When is JavaScript's eval() not evil?How to sort a dataframe by multiple column(s)?How to join (merge) data frames (inner, outer, left, right)What's the difference between eval, exec, and compile?How to make a great R reproducible exampleWhat does Python's eval() do? Avoiding the infamous “eval(parse())” constructUse argument value as variable name in R during function runR: eval parse function call not accessing correct environments

Is it professional to write unrelated content in an almost-empty email?

What does convergence in distribution "in the Gromov–Hausdorff" sense mean?

Is there a difference between "Fahrstuhl" and "Aufzug"

Is it possible to search for a directory/file combination?

Anatomically Correct Strange Women In Ponds Distributing Swords

Unreliable Magic - Is it worth it?

Is micro rebar a better way to reinforce concrete than rebar?

Elegant way to replace substring in a regex with optional groups in Python?

Received an invoice from my ex-employer billing me for training; how to handle?

Is there a way to save my career from absolute disaster?

What does "Its cash flow is deeply negative" mean?

Can I run my washing machine drain line into a condensate pump so it drains better?

How do I avoid eval and parse?

How did people program for Consoles with multiple CPUs?

How to count occurrences of text in a file?

Would this house-rule that treats advantage as a +1 to the roll instead (and disadvantage as -1) and allows them to stack be balanced?

Why do airplanes bank sharply to the right after air-to-air refueling?

Why has the US not been more assertive in confronting Russia in recent years?

Novel about a guy who is possessed by the divine essence and the world ends?

Why didn't Khan get resurrected in the Genesis Explosion?

Sending manuscript to multiple publishers

How to start emacs in "nothing" mode (`fundamental-mode`)

If Nick Fury and Coulson already knew about aliens (Kree and Skrull) why did they wait until Thor's appearance to start making weapons?

Complex fractions



How do I avoid eval and parse?



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowAvoiding the infamous “eval(parse())” constructR: eval(parse(…)) is often suboptimalWhy is using the JavaScript eval function a bad idea?When is JavaScript's eval() not evil?How to sort a dataframe by multiple column(s)?How to join (merge) data frames (inner, outer, left, right)What's the difference between eval, exec, and compile?How to make a great R reproducible exampleWhat does Python's eval() do? Avoiding the infamous “eval(parse())” constructUse argument value as variable name in R during function runR: eval parse function call not accessing correct environments










10















I have written a function that sources files that contain scripts for other functions and stores these functions in an alternative environment so that they aren't cluttering up the global environment. The code works, but contains two instances of eval(parse(...)):



# sourceFunctionHidden ---------------------------
# source a function and hide the function from the global environment
sourceFunctionHidden <- function(functions, environment = "env", ...)
if (environment %in% search())
while (environment %in% search())
if (!exists("counter", inherits = F)) counter <- 0
eval(parse(text = paste0("detach(", environment, ")")))
counter <- counter + 1

cat("detached", counter, environment, "sn")
else cat("no", environment, "attachedn")
if (!environment %in% ls(.GlobalEnv, all.names = T))
assign(environment, new.env(), pos = .GlobalEnv)
cat("created", environment, "n")
else cat(environment, "already existsn")
sapply(functions, function(func)
# source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), .env)
source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"))
eval(parse(text = paste0(environment, "$", func," <- ", func)))
cat(func, "created in", environment, "n")
)
# rm(list = functions, pos = .GlobalEnv)
eval(parse(text = paste0("attach(", environment, ")")))
cat("attached", environment, "nn")



Much has been written about the sub-optimality of the eval(parse(...)) construction (see here and here). However, the discussions that I've found mostly deal with alternate strategies for subsetting. The first instance of eval(parse(...)) in my code doesn't involve subsetting (the second instance might be related to subsetting).



Is there a way to call new.env(...) and [environment name]$[function name] <- [function name] without resorting to eval(parse(...))? Thanks.



N.B.: I don't want to change the names of my functions to .name to hide them in the global environment










share|improve this question






















  • Just discovered that eval(parse(text = paste0("detach(", environment, ")"))) can be replaced with detach(environment, character.only = T). The question about improving eval(parse(text = paste0("attach(", environment, ")"))) remains.

    – Josh
    17 mins ago
















10















I have written a function that sources files that contain scripts for other functions and stores these functions in an alternative environment so that they aren't cluttering up the global environment. The code works, but contains two instances of eval(parse(...)):



# sourceFunctionHidden ---------------------------
# source a function and hide the function from the global environment
sourceFunctionHidden <- function(functions, environment = "env", ...)
if (environment %in% search())
while (environment %in% search())
if (!exists("counter", inherits = F)) counter <- 0
eval(parse(text = paste0("detach(", environment, ")")))
counter <- counter + 1

cat("detached", counter, environment, "sn")
else cat("no", environment, "attachedn")
if (!environment %in% ls(.GlobalEnv, all.names = T))
assign(environment, new.env(), pos = .GlobalEnv)
cat("created", environment, "n")
else cat(environment, "already existsn")
sapply(functions, function(func)
# source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), .env)
source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"))
eval(parse(text = paste0(environment, "$", func," <- ", func)))
cat(func, "created in", environment, "n")
)
# rm(list = functions, pos = .GlobalEnv)
eval(parse(text = paste0("attach(", environment, ")")))
cat("attached", environment, "nn")



Much has been written about the sub-optimality of the eval(parse(...)) construction (see here and here). However, the discussions that I've found mostly deal with alternate strategies for subsetting. The first instance of eval(parse(...)) in my code doesn't involve subsetting (the second instance might be related to subsetting).



Is there a way to call new.env(...) and [environment name]$[function name] <- [function name] without resorting to eval(parse(...))? Thanks.



N.B.: I don't want to change the names of my functions to .name to hide them in the global environment










share|improve this question






















  • Just discovered that eval(parse(text = paste0("detach(", environment, ")"))) can be replaced with detach(environment, character.only = T). The question about improving eval(parse(text = paste0("attach(", environment, ")"))) remains.

    – Josh
    17 mins ago














10












10








10








I have written a function that sources files that contain scripts for other functions and stores these functions in an alternative environment so that they aren't cluttering up the global environment. The code works, but contains two instances of eval(parse(...)):



# sourceFunctionHidden ---------------------------
# source a function and hide the function from the global environment
sourceFunctionHidden <- function(functions, environment = "env", ...)
if (environment %in% search())
while (environment %in% search())
if (!exists("counter", inherits = F)) counter <- 0
eval(parse(text = paste0("detach(", environment, ")")))
counter <- counter + 1

cat("detached", counter, environment, "sn")
else cat("no", environment, "attachedn")
if (!environment %in% ls(.GlobalEnv, all.names = T))
assign(environment, new.env(), pos = .GlobalEnv)
cat("created", environment, "n")
else cat(environment, "already existsn")
sapply(functions, function(func)
# source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), .env)
source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"))
eval(parse(text = paste0(environment, "$", func," <- ", func)))
cat(func, "created in", environment, "n")
)
# rm(list = functions, pos = .GlobalEnv)
eval(parse(text = paste0("attach(", environment, ")")))
cat("attached", environment, "nn")



Much has been written about the sub-optimality of the eval(parse(...)) construction (see here and here). However, the discussions that I've found mostly deal with alternate strategies for subsetting. The first instance of eval(parse(...)) in my code doesn't involve subsetting (the second instance might be related to subsetting).



Is there a way to call new.env(...) and [environment name]$[function name] <- [function name] without resorting to eval(parse(...))? Thanks.



N.B.: I don't want to change the names of my functions to .name to hide them in the global environment










share|improve this question














I have written a function that sources files that contain scripts for other functions and stores these functions in an alternative environment so that they aren't cluttering up the global environment. The code works, but contains two instances of eval(parse(...)):



# sourceFunctionHidden ---------------------------
# source a function and hide the function from the global environment
sourceFunctionHidden <- function(functions, environment = "env", ...)
if (environment %in% search())
while (environment %in% search())
if (!exists("counter", inherits = F)) counter <- 0
eval(parse(text = paste0("detach(", environment, ")")))
counter <- counter + 1

cat("detached", counter, environment, "sn")
else cat("no", environment, "attachedn")
if (!environment %in% ls(.GlobalEnv, all.names = T))
assign(environment, new.env(), pos = .GlobalEnv)
cat("created", environment, "n")
else cat(environment, "already existsn")
sapply(functions, function(func)
# source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), .env)
source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"))
eval(parse(text = paste0(environment, "$", func," <- ", func)))
cat(func, "created in", environment, "n")
)
# rm(list = functions, pos = .GlobalEnv)
eval(parse(text = paste0("attach(", environment, ")")))
cat("attached", environment, "nn")



Much has been written about the sub-optimality of the eval(parse(...)) construction (see here and here). However, the discussions that I've found mostly deal with alternate strategies for subsetting. The first instance of eval(parse(...)) in my code doesn't involve subsetting (the second instance might be related to subsetting).



Is there a way to call new.env(...) and [environment name]$[function name] <- [function name] without resorting to eval(parse(...))? Thanks.



N.B.: I don't want to change the names of my functions to .name to hide them in the global environment







r eval






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 4 hours ago









JoshJosh

19512




19512












  • Just discovered that eval(parse(text = paste0("detach(", environment, ")"))) can be replaced with detach(environment, character.only = T). The question about improving eval(parse(text = paste0("attach(", environment, ")"))) remains.

    – Josh
    17 mins ago


















  • Just discovered that eval(parse(text = paste0("detach(", environment, ")"))) can be replaced with detach(environment, character.only = T). The question about improving eval(parse(text = paste0("attach(", environment, ")"))) remains.

    – Josh
    17 mins ago

















Just discovered that eval(parse(text = paste0("detach(", environment, ")"))) can be replaced with detach(environment, character.only = T). The question about improving eval(parse(text = paste0("attach(", environment, ")"))) remains.

– Josh
17 mins ago






Just discovered that eval(parse(text = paste0("detach(", environment, ")"))) can be replaced with detach(environment, character.only = T). The question about improving eval(parse(text = paste0("attach(", environment, ")"))) remains.

– Josh
17 mins ago













2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3














If you want to keep it off global_env, put it into a package. It's common for people in the R community to put a bunch of frequently used helper functions into their own personal package.






share|improve this answer























  • I agree. I eventually need to learn how to do this.

    – Josh
    15 mins ago


















3














For what its worth, the function source actually uses eval(parse(...)), albeit in a somewhat subtle way. First, .Internal(parse(...)) is used to create expressions, which after more processing are later passed to eval. So eval(parse(...)) seems to be good enough for the R core team in this instance.



That said, you don't need to jump through hoops to source functions into a new environment. source provides an argument local that can be used for precisely this.




local: TRUE, FALSE or an environment, determining where the parsed expressions are evaluated.




An example:



env = new.env()
source('test.r', local = env)


testing it works:



env$test('hello', 'world')
# [1] "hello world"
ls(pattern = 'test')
# character(0)


And an example test.r file to use this on:



test = function(a,b) paste(a,b)





share|improve this answer























  • Thank you, I missed that aspect of source(). However, if I change that line of code to source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment) I get the error Error in source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment) : 'local' must be TRUE, FALSE or an environment. Is there a way to convert the "env" that comes from environment to env?

    – Josh
    8 mins ago












Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55426015%2fhow-do-i-avoid-eval-and-parse%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3














If you want to keep it off global_env, put it into a package. It's common for people in the R community to put a bunch of frequently used helper functions into their own personal package.






share|improve this answer























  • I agree. I eventually need to learn how to do this.

    – Josh
    15 mins ago















3














If you want to keep it off global_env, put it into a package. It's common for people in the R community to put a bunch of frequently used helper functions into their own personal package.






share|improve this answer























  • I agree. I eventually need to learn how to do this.

    – Josh
    15 mins ago













3












3








3







If you want to keep it off global_env, put it into a package. It's common for people in the R community to put a bunch of frequently used helper functions into their own personal package.






share|improve this answer













If you want to keep it off global_env, put it into a package. It's common for people in the R community to put a bunch of frequently used helper functions into their own personal package.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 3 hours ago









thcthc

5,37611224




5,37611224












  • I agree. I eventually need to learn how to do this.

    – Josh
    15 mins ago

















  • I agree. I eventually need to learn how to do this.

    – Josh
    15 mins ago
















I agree. I eventually need to learn how to do this.

– Josh
15 mins ago





I agree. I eventually need to learn how to do this.

– Josh
15 mins ago













3














For what its worth, the function source actually uses eval(parse(...)), albeit in a somewhat subtle way. First, .Internal(parse(...)) is used to create expressions, which after more processing are later passed to eval. So eval(parse(...)) seems to be good enough for the R core team in this instance.



That said, you don't need to jump through hoops to source functions into a new environment. source provides an argument local that can be used for precisely this.




local: TRUE, FALSE or an environment, determining where the parsed expressions are evaluated.




An example:



env = new.env()
source('test.r', local = env)


testing it works:



env$test('hello', 'world')
# [1] "hello world"
ls(pattern = 'test')
# character(0)


And an example test.r file to use this on:



test = function(a,b) paste(a,b)





share|improve this answer























  • Thank you, I missed that aspect of source(). However, if I change that line of code to source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment) I get the error Error in source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment) : 'local' must be TRUE, FALSE or an environment. Is there a way to convert the "env" that comes from environment to env?

    – Josh
    8 mins ago
















3














For what its worth, the function source actually uses eval(parse(...)), albeit in a somewhat subtle way. First, .Internal(parse(...)) is used to create expressions, which after more processing are later passed to eval. So eval(parse(...)) seems to be good enough for the R core team in this instance.



That said, you don't need to jump through hoops to source functions into a new environment. source provides an argument local that can be used for precisely this.




local: TRUE, FALSE or an environment, determining where the parsed expressions are evaluated.




An example:



env = new.env()
source('test.r', local = env)


testing it works:



env$test('hello', 'world')
# [1] "hello world"
ls(pattern = 'test')
# character(0)


And an example test.r file to use this on:



test = function(a,b) paste(a,b)





share|improve this answer























  • Thank you, I missed that aspect of source(). However, if I change that line of code to source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment) I get the error Error in source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment) : 'local' must be TRUE, FALSE or an environment. Is there a way to convert the "env" that comes from environment to env?

    – Josh
    8 mins ago














3












3








3







For what its worth, the function source actually uses eval(parse(...)), albeit in a somewhat subtle way. First, .Internal(parse(...)) is used to create expressions, which after more processing are later passed to eval. So eval(parse(...)) seems to be good enough for the R core team in this instance.



That said, you don't need to jump through hoops to source functions into a new environment. source provides an argument local that can be used for precisely this.




local: TRUE, FALSE or an environment, determining where the parsed expressions are evaluated.




An example:



env = new.env()
source('test.r', local = env)


testing it works:



env$test('hello', 'world')
# [1] "hello world"
ls(pattern = 'test')
# character(0)


And an example test.r file to use this on:



test = function(a,b) paste(a,b)





share|improve this answer













For what its worth, the function source actually uses eval(parse(...)), albeit in a somewhat subtle way. First, .Internal(parse(...)) is used to create expressions, which after more processing are later passed to eval. So eval(parse(...)) seems to be good enough for the R core team in this instance.



That said, you don't need to jump through hoops to source functions into a new environment. source provides an argument local that can be used for precisely this.




local: TRUE, FALSE or an environment, determining where the parsed expressions are evaluated.




An example:



env = new.env()
source('test.r', local = env)


testing it works:



env$test('hello', 'world')
# [1] "hello world"
ls(pattern = 'test')
# character(0)


And an example test.r file to use this on:



test = function(a,b) paste(a,b)






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 2 hours ago









dwwdww

15.9k32659




15.9k32659












  • Thank you, I missed that aspect of source(). However, if I change that line of code to source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment) I get the error Error in source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment) : 'local' must be TRUE, FALSE or an environment. Is there a way to convert the "env" that comes from environment to env?

    – Josh
    8 mins ago


















  • Thank you, I missed that aspect of source(). However, if I change that line of code to source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment) I get the error Error in source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment) : 'local' must be TRUE, FALSE or an environment. Is there a way to convert the "env" that comes from environment to env?

    – Josh
    8 mins ago

















Thank you, I missed that aspect of source(). However, if I change that line of code to source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment) I get the error Error in source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment) : 'local' must be TRUE, FALSE or an environment. Is there a way to convert the "env" that comes from environment to env?

– Josh
8 mins ago






Thank you, I missed that aspect of source(). However, if I change that line of code to source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment) I get the error Error in source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment) : 'local' must be TRUE, FALSE or an environment. Is there a way to convert the "env" that comes from environment to env?

– Josh
8 mins ago


















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55426015%2fhow-do-i-avoid-eval-and-parse%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Reverse int within the 32-bit signed integer range: [−2^31, 2^31 − 1]Combining two 32-bit integers into one 64-bit integerDetermine if an int is within rangeLossy packing 32 bit integer to 16 bitComputing the square root of a 64-bit integerKeeping integer addition within boundsSafe multiplication of two 64-bit signed integersLeetcode 10: Regular Expression MatchingSigned integer-to-ascii x86_64 assembler macroReverse the digits of an Integer“Add two numbers given in reverse order from a linked list”

Category:Fedor von Bock Media in category "Fedor von Bock"Navigation menuUpload mediaISNI: 0000 0000 5511 3417VIAF ID: 24712551GND ID: 119294796Library of Congress authority ID: n96068363BnF ID: 12534305fSUDOC authorities ID: 034604189Open Library ID: OL338253ANKCR AUT ID: jn19990000869National Library of Israel ID: 000514068National Thesaurus for Author Names ID: 341574317ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

Kiel Indholdsfortegnelse Historie | Transport og færgeforbindelser | Sejlsport og anden sport | Kultur | Kendte personer fra Kiel | Noter | Litteratur | Eksterne henvisninger | Navigationsmenuwww.kiel.de54°19′31″N 10°8′26″Ø / 54.32528°N 10.14056°Ø / 54.32528; 10.14056Oberbürgermeister Dr. Ulf Kämpferwww.statistik-nord.deDen danske Stats StatistikKiels hjemmesiderrrWorldCat312794080n790547494030481-4