Why is this estimator biased?How do I check for bias of an estimator?Bootstrap confidence interval for a biased estimatorConceptual question about bias of an estimatorEstimator, unbiased or biasedCalculating risk for a density estimatorLinear model with biased estimatorBias Correction for Estimator with known biasWhy is OLS estimator of AR(1) coefficient biased?Cramer-Rao lower bound for biased estimatorVariance of distribution for maximum likelihood estimator

Lowest total scrabble score

What exactly color does ozone gas have?

Probability that THHT occurs in a sequence of 10 coin tosses

Add big quotation marks inside my colorbox

Limits and Infinite Integration by Parts

Does malloc reserve more space while allocating memory?

What does "Scientists rise up against statistical significance" mean? (Comment in Nature)

Yosemite Fire Rings - What to Expect?

How do apertures which seem too large to physically fit work?

Angel of Condemnation - Exile creature with second ability

What to do when eye contact makes your subordinate uncomfortable?

What if a revenant (monster) gains fire resistance?

Using substitution ciphers to generate new alphabets in a novel

putting logo on same line but after title, latex

Do we have to expect a queue for the shuttle from Watford Junction to Harry Potter Studio?

What is the highest possible scrabble score for placing a single tile

Why can Carol Danvers change her suit colours in the first place?

Can disgust be a key component of horror?

What is Cash Advance APR?

Quasinilpotent , non-compact operators

What if you are holding an Iron Flask with a demon inside and walk into Antimagic Field?

Multiplicative persistence

Plot of a tornado-shaped surface

System.QueryException unexpected token



Why is this estimator biased?


How do I check for bias of an estimator?Bootstrap confidence interval for a biased estimatorConceptual question about bias of an estimatorEstimator, unbiased or biasedCalculating risk for a density estimatorLinear model with biased estimatorBias Correction for Estimator with known biasWhy is OLS estimator of AR(1) coefficient biased?Cramer-Rao lower bound for biased estimatorVariance of distribution for maximum likelihood estimator













1












$begingroup$


$X_1,X_2,..,X_n$ are iid $sim Poisson(mu)$



than the MLE for $theta=e^-mu$ is $hat theta =e^-bar x$



Why is this considered to be biased for $theta$?



Is $E[hat theta]$ not $theta$ ?



as



$E[bar x]= mu$










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    E[f(X)] != f(E[X]) in general.
    $endgroup$
    – The Laconic
    1 hour ago











  • $begingroup$
    I know that general result but I am still confused how to do it here since the sum of poisson is also poisson with mean $n mu$
    $endgroup$
    – Quality
    1 hour ago















1












$begingroup$


$X_1,X_2,..,X_n$ are iid $sim Poisson(mu)$



than the MLE for $theta=e^-mu$ is $hat theta =e^-bar x$



Why is this considered to be biased for $theta$?



Is $E[hat theta]$ not $theta$ ?



as



$E[bar x]= mu$










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    E[f(X)] != f(E[X]) in general.
    $endgroup$
    – The Laconic
    1 hour ago











  • $begingroup$
    I know that general result but I am still confused how to do it here since the sum of poisson is also poisson with mean $n mu$
    $endgroup$
    – Quality
    1 hour ago













1












1








1


1



$begingroup$


$X_1,X_2,..,X_n$ are iid $sim Poisson(mu)$



than the MLE for $theta=e^-mu$ is $hat theta =e^-bar x$



Why is this considered to be biased for $theta$?



Is $E[hat theta]$ not $theta$ ?



as



$E[bar x]= mu$










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




$X_1,X_2,..,X_n$ are iid $sim Poisson(mu)$



than the MLE for $theta=e^-mu$ is $hat theta =e^-bar x$



Why is this considered to be biased for $theta$?



Is $E[hat theta]$ not $theta$ ?



as



$E[bar x]= mu$







estimation poisson-distribution bias






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 1 hour ago









QualityQuality

29019




29019







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    E[f(X)] != f(E[X]) in general.
    $endgroup$
    – The Laconic
    1 hour ago











  • $begingroup$
    I know that general result but I am still confused how to do it here since the sum of poisson is also poisson with mean $n mu$
    $endgroup$
    – Quality
    1 hour ago












  • 3




    $begingroup$
    E[f(X)] != f(E[X]) in general.
    $endgroup$
    – The Laconic
    1 hour ago











  • $begingroup$
    I know that general result but I am still confused how to do it here since the sum of poisson is also poisson with mean $n mu$
    $endgroup$
    – Quality
    1 hour ago







3




3




$begingroup$
E[f(X)] != f(E[X]) in general.
$endgroup$
– The Laconic
1 hour ago





$begingroup$
E[f(X)] != f(E[X]) in general.
$endgroup$
– The Laconic
1 hour ago













$begingroup$
I know that general result but I am still confused how to do it here since the sum of poisson is also poisson with mean $n mu$
$endgroup$
– Quality
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
I know that general result but I am still confused how to do it here since the sum of poisson is also poisson with mean $n mu$
$endgroup$
– Quality
1 hour ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

Recall that the moment generating function of $X sim operatornamePoisson(mu)$ is
$$
E[e^s X] = exp(mu(e^s - 1))
$$

for all $s in mathbbR$



Proof.
We just compute:
$$
beginaligned
E[e^s X]
&= sum_k=0^infty e^s k e^-mu fracmu^kk! \
&= e^-mu sum_k=0^infty fracleft(mu e^sright)^kk! \
&= e^-mu e^mu e^s \
&= exp(mu(e^s - 1)).
endaligned
$$

We will use this result with $s = -1/n$.



If $X_1, ldots, X_n sim operatornamePoisson(mu)$ are i.i.d. and
$$
widehattheta
= expleft(-frac1n sum_i=1^n X_iright)
= prod_i=1^n expleft(-fracX_inright),
$$

then, using independence,
$$
beginaligned
E[widehattheta]
&= prod_i=1^n Eleft[e^-X_i / nright] \
&= prod_i=1^n exp(mu(e^-1/n - 1)) \
&= exp(n mu(e^-1/n - 1)) \
&neq e^-mu,
endaligned
$$

so $widehattheta$ is not an unbiased estimator of $e^-mu$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you, makes perfect sense
    $endgroup$
    – Quality
    1 hour ago


















3












$begingroup$

As an aside from finding the exact expectation, you can use Jensen's inequality, which says that for a random variable $X$ and a convex function $g$,



$$Eleft[g(X)right]ge gleft(Eleft[Xright]right)$$



, provided the expectations exist.



Verify that $g(x)=e^-x$ is a convex function from the fact that $g''>0$.



The equality does not hold because $g$ is not an affine function or a constant function.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "65"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f398954%2fwhy-is-this-estimator-biased%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3












    $begingroup$

    Recall that the moment generating function of $X sim operatornamePoisson(mu)$ is
    $$
    E[e^s X] = exp(mu(e^s - 1))
    $$

    for all $s in mathbbR$



    Proof.
    We just compute:
    $$
    beginaligned
    E[e^s X]
    &= sum_k=0^infty e^s k e^-mu fracmu^kk! \
    &= e^-mu sum_k=0^infty fracleft(mu e^sright)^kk! \
    &= e^-mu e^mu e^s \
    &= exp(mu(e^s - 1)).
    endaligned
    $$

    We will use this result with $s = -1/n$.



    If $X_1, ldots, X_n sim operatornamePoisson(mu)$ are i.i.d. and
    $$
    widehattheta
    = expleft(-frac1n sum_i=1^n X_iright)
    = prod_i=1^n expleft(-fracX_inright),
    $$

    then, using independence,
    $$
    beginaligned
    E[widehattheta]
    &= prod_i=1^n Eleft[e^-X_i / nright] \
    &= prod_i=1^n exp(mu(e^-1/n - 1)) \
    &= exp(n mu(e^-1/n - 1)) \
    &neq e^-mu,
    endaligned
    $$

    so $widehattheta$ is not an unbiased estimator of $e^-mu$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Thank you, makes perfect sense
      $endgroup$
      – Quality
      1 hour ago















    3












    $begingroup$

    Recall that the moment generating function of $X sim operatornamePoisson(mu)$ is
    $$
    E[e^s X] = exp(mu(e^s - 1))
    $$

    for all $s in mathbbR$



    Proof.
    We just compute:
    $$
    beginaligned
    E[e^s X]
    &= sum_k=0^infty e^s k e^-mu fracmu^kk! \
    &= e^-mu sum_k=0^infty fracleft(mu e^sright)^kk! \
    &= e^-mu e^mu e^s \
    &= exp(mu(e^s - 1)).
    endaligned
    $$

    We will use this result with $s = -1/n$.



    If $X_1, ldots, X_n sim operatornamePoisson(mu)$ are i.i.d. and
    $$
    widehattheta
    = expleft(-frac1n sum_i=1^n X_iright)
    = prod_i=1^n expleft(-fracX_inright),
    $$

    then, using independence,
    $$
    beginaligned
    E[widehattheta]
    &= prod_i=1^n Eleft[e^-X_i / nright] \
    &= prod_i=1^n exp(mu(e^-1/n - 1)) \
    &= exp(n mu(e^-1/n - 1)) \
    &neq e^-mu,
    endaligned
    $$

    so $widehattheta$ is not an unbiased estimator of $e^-mu$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Thank you, makes perfect sense
      $endgroup$
      – Quality
      1 hour ago













    3












    3








    3





    $begingroup$

    Recall that the moment generating function of $X sim operatornamePoisson(mu)$ is
    $$
    E[e^s X] = exp(mu(e^s - 1))
    $$

    for all $s in mathbbR$



    Proof.
    We just compute:
    $$
    beginaligned
    E[e^s X]
    &= sum_k=0^infty e^s k e^-mu fracmu^kk! \
    &= e^-mu sum_k=0^infty fracleft(mu e^sright)^kk! \
    &= e^-mu e^mu e^s \
    &= exp(mu(e^s - 1)).
    endaligned
    $$

    We will use this result with $s = -1/n$.



    If $X_1, ldots, X_n sim operatornamePoisson(mu)$ are i.i.d. and
    $$
    widehattheta
    = expleft(-frac1n sum_i=1^n X_iright)
    = prod_i=1^n expleft(-fracX_inright),
    $$

    then, using independence,
    $$
    beginaligned
    E[widehattheta]
    &= prod_i=1^n Eleft[e^-X_i / nright] \
    &= prod_i=1^n exp(mu(e^-1/n - 1)) \
    &= exp(n mu(e^-1/n - 1)) \
    &neq e^-mu,
    endaligned
    $$

    so $widehattheta$ is not an unbiased estimator of $e^-mu$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    Recall that the moment generating function of $X sim operatornamePoisson(mu)$ is
    $$
    E[e^s X] = exp(mu(e^s - 1))
    $$

    for all $s in mathbbR$



    Proof.
    We just compute:
    $$
    beginaligned
    E[e^s X]
    &= sum_k=0^infty e^s k e^-mu fracmu^kk! \
    &= e^-mu sum_k=0^infty fracleft(mu e^sright)^kk! \
    &= e^-mu e^mu e^s \
    &= exp(mu(e^s - 1)).
    endaligned
    $$

    We will use this result with $s = -1/n$.



    If $X_1, ldots, X_n sim operatornamePoisson(mu)$ are i.i.d. and
    $$
    widehattheta
    = expleft(-frac1n sum_i=1^n X_iright)
    = prod_i=1^n expleft(-fracX_inright),
    $$

    then, using independence,
    $$
    beginaligned
    E[widehattheta]
    &= prod_i=1^n Eleft[e^-X_i / nright] \
    &= prod_i=1^n exp(mu(e^-1/n - 1)) \
    &= exp(n mu(e^-1/n - 1)) \
    &neq e^-mu,
    endaligned
    $$

    so $widehattheta$ is not an unbiased estimator of $e^-mu$







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered 1 hour ago









    Artem MavrinArtem Mavrin

    1,066710




    1,066710











    • $begingroup$
      Thank you, makes perfect sense
      $endgroup$
      – Quality
      1 hour ago
















    • $begingroup$
      Thank you, makes perfect sense
      $endgroup$
      – Quality
      1 hour ago















    $begingroup$
    Thank you, makes perfect sense
    $endgroup$
    – Quality
    1 hour ago




    $begingroup$
    Thank you, makes perfect sense
    $endgroup$
    – Quality
    1 hour ago













    3












    $begingroup$

    As an aside from finding the exact expectation, you can use Jensen's inequality, which says that for a random variable $X$ and a convex function $g$,



    $$Eleft[g(X)right]ge gleft(Eleft[Xright]right)$$



    , provided the expectations exist.



    Verify that $g(x)=e^-x$ is a convex function from the fact that $g''>0$.



    The equality does not hold because $g$ is not an affine function or a constant function.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      3












      $begingroup$

      As an aside from finding the exact expectation, you can use Jensen's inequality, which says that for a random variable $X$ and a convex function $g$,



      $$Eleft[g(X)right]ge gleft(Eleft[Xright]right)$$



      , provided the expectations exist.



      Verify that $g(x)=e^-x$ is a convex function from the fact that $g''>0$.



      The equality does not hold because $g$ is not an affine function or a constant function.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        3












        3








        3





        $begingroup$

        As an aside from finding the exact expectation, you can use Jensen's inequality, which says that for a random variable $X$ and a convex function $g$,



        $$Eleft[g(X)right]ge gleft(Eleft[Xright]right)$$



        , provided the expectations exist.



        Verify that $g(x)=e^-x$ is a convex function from the fact that $g''>0$.



        The equality does not hold because $g$ is not an affine function or a constant function.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        As an aside from finding the exact expectation, you can use Jensen's inequality, which says that for a random variable $X$ and a convex function $g$,



        $$Eleft[g(X)right]ge gleft(Eleft[Xright]right)$$



        , provided the expectations exist.



        Verify that $g(x)=e^-x$ is a convex function from the fact that $g''>0$.



        The equality does not hold because $g$ is not an affine function or a constant function.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 1 hour ago









        StubbornAtomStubbornAtom

        2,7771532




        2,7771532



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Cross Validated!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f398954%2fwhy-is-this-estimator-biased%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Category:Fedor von Bock Media in category "Fedor von Bock"Navigation menuUpload mediaISNI: 0000 0000 5511 3417VIAF ID: 24712551GND ID: 119294796Library of Congress authority ID: n96068363BnF ID: 12534305fSUDOC authorities ID: 034604189Open Library ID: OL338253ANKCR AUT ID: jn19990000869National Library of Israel ID: 000514068National Thesaurus for Author Names ID: 341574317ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

            Reverse int within the 32-bit signed integer range: [−2^31, 2^31 − 1]Combining two 32-bit integers into one 64-bit integerDetermine if an int is within rangeLossy packing 32 bit integer to 16 bitComputing the square root of a 64-bit integerKeeping integer addition within boundsSafe multiplication of two 64-bit signed integersLeetcode 10: Regular Expression MatchingSigned integer-to-ascii x86_64 assembler macroReverse the digits of an Integer“Add two numbers given in reverse order from a linked list”

            Kiel Indholdsfortegnelse Historie | Transport og færgeforbindelser | Sejlsport og anden sport | Kultur | Kendte personer fra Kiel | Noter | Litteratur | Eksterne henvisninger | Navigationsmenuwww.kiel.de54°19′31″N 10°8′26″Ø / 54.32528°N 10.14056°Ø / 54.32528; 10.14056Oberbürgermeister Dr. Ulf Kämpferwww.statistik-nord.deDen danske Stats StatistikKiels hjemmesiderrrWorldCat312794080n790547494030481-4