Email Account under attack (really) - anything I can do?When secure email, is not really secureSpam Mail - have someone broke in to my shared hosting account?Could someone stop another from accessing their own online account?Can/do botnets brute force “high value” users of services like Gmail?Hijacked Aol Email Account - Lack of security?Sending password reset links in emailIs there more of a security risk by providing an email when creating a new account?How viable is MITM interception of email, really?Email really sent or not?A safer way to read emails on Android devices

How to say job offer in Mandarin/Cantonese?

Magento 2: Admin panel 3 level menu structure not working

How can bays and straits be determined in a procedurally generated map?

Why don't electron-positron collisions release infinite energy?

same font throughout bibliography

How does one intimidate enemies without having the capacity for violence?

What do the dots in this tr command do: tr .............A-Z A-ZA-Z <<< "JVPQBOV" (with 13 dots)

Is it possible to rebuild the bike frame (to make it lighter) by welding aluminum tubes

How old can references or sources in a thesis be?

If I cast Expeditious Retreat, can I Dash as a bonus action on the same turn?

Why was the small council so happy for Tyrion to become the Master of Coin?

Why Is Death Allowed In the Matrix?

Has the BBC provided arguments for saying Brexit being cancelled is unlikely?

Shell script not opening as desktop application

Accidentally leaked the solution to an assignment, what to do now? (I'm the prof)

How much RAM could one put in a typical 80386 setup?

DOS, create pipe for stdin/stdout of command.com(or 4dos.com) in C or Batch?

Mains transformer blew up amplifier, incorrect description in wiring instructions?

What would happen to a modern skyscraper if it rains micro blackholes?

Why did the Germans forbid the possession of pet pigeons in Rostov-on-Don in 1941?

Did Shadowfax go to Valinor?

Mathematical cryptic clues

Animated Series: Alien black spider robot crashes on Earth

How did the USSR manage to innovate in an environment characterized by government censorship and high bureaucracy?



Email Account under attack (really) - anything I can do?


When secure email, is not really secureSpam Mail - have someone broke in to my shared hosting account?Could someone stop another from accessing their own online account?Can/do botnets brute force “high value” users of services like Gmail?Hijacked Aol Email Account - Lack of security?Sending password reset links in emailIs there more of a security risk by providing an email when creating a new account?How viable is MITM interception of email, really?Email really sent or not?A safer way to read emails on Android devices






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








25















Over the last week, there is a constant barrage of authentication failures to my email account from a variety of ip addresses - usually in blocks of exactly 575 attempts.



My password is as strong as a password can be so the chance of brute force winning is infinitesimal. However as a result of the authentication failures, my hosting provider keeps locking the email account.



Is there anything I can do (or that I can ask my hosting provider to do), or am I just screwed until the botnet moves on? Anyone with similar experience who can comment on whether I can expect this to ever end?










share|improve this question







New contributor




clemdia is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 17





    Ask your email provider to make a change, that's the only options. In the meantime, open a new account and forward all emails to your new account so that you are still functional?

    – schroeder
    yesterday






  • 3





    Are you using one of the big email providers (Gmail, etc) or something smaller?

    – Anders
    22 hours ago






  • 3





    Get a better provider that isn't so vulnerable to this kind of trivial DoS?

    – Nate Eldredge
    16 hours ago






  • 1





    Maybe another account is under attack (Bank? Facebook? Income tax refund? Domain in your possession?), and they are taking out your email so you don't get notified.

    – jww
    15 hours ago












  • I had a similar experience with my account: The culprit actually was my phone, that had an outdated password for the account and repeatedly tried to log into it unsuccessfully.

    – pat3d3r
    6 hours ago

















25















Over the last week, there is a constant barrage of authentication failures to my email account from a variety of ip addresses - usually in blocks of exactly 575 attempts.



My password is as strong as a password can be so the chance of brute force winning is infinitesimal. However as a result of the authentication failures, my hosting provider keeps locking the email account.



Is there anything I can do (or that I can ask my hosting provider to do), or am I just screwed until the botnet moves on? Anyone with similar experience who can comment on whether I can expect this to ever end?










share|improve this question







New contributor




clemdia is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 17





    Ask your email provider to make a change, that's the only options. In the meantime, open a new account and forward all emails to your new account so that you are still functional?

    – schroeder
    yesterday






  • 3





    Are you using one of the big email providers (Gmail, etc) or something smaller?

    – Anders
    22 hours ago






  • 3





    Get a better provider that isn't so vulnerable to this kind of trivial DoS?

    – Nate Eldredge
    16 hours ago






  • 1





    Maybe another account is under attack (Bank? Facebook? Income tax refund? Domain in your possession?), and they are taking out your email so you don't get notified.

    – jww
    15 hours ago












  • I had a similar experience with my account: The culprit actually was my phone, that had an outdated password for the account and repeatedly tried to log into it unsuccessfully.

    – pat3d3r
    6 hours ago













25












25








25


1






Over the last week, there is a constant barrage of authentication failures to my email account from a variety of ip addresses - usually in blocks of exactly 575 attempts.



My password is as strong as a password can be so the chance of brute force winning is infinitesimal. However as a result of the authentication failures, my hosting provider keeps locking the email account.



Is there anything I can do (or that I can ask my hosting provider to do), or am I just screwed until the botnet moves on? Anyone with similar experience who can comment on whether I can expect this to ever end?










share|improve this question







New contributor




clemdia is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












Over the last week, there is a constant barrage of authentication failures to my email account from a variety of ip addresses - usually in blocks of exactly 575 attempts.



My password is as strong as a password can be so the chance of brute force winning is infinitesimal. However as a result of the authentication failures, my hosting provider keeps locking the email account.



Is there anything I can do (or that I can ask my hosting provider to do), or am I just screwed until the botnet moves on? Anyone with similar experience who can comment on whether I can expect this to ever end?







email botnet






share|improve this question







New contributor




clemdia is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




clemdia is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




clemdia is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









clemdiaclemdia

12615




12615




New contributor




clemdia is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





clemdia is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






clemdia is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 17





    Ask your email provider to make a change, that's the only options. In the meantime, open a new account and forward all emails to your new account so that you are still functional?

    – schroeder
    yesterday






  • 3





    Are you using one of the big email providers (Gmail, etc) or something smaller?

    – Anders
    22 hours ago






  • 3





    Get a better provider that isn't so vulnerable to this kind of trivial DoS?

    – Nate Eldredge
    16 hours ago






  • 1





    Maybe another account is under attack (Bank? Facebook? Income tax refund? Domain in your possession?), and they are taking out your email so you don't get notified.

    – jww
    15 hours ago












  • I had a similar experience with my account: The culprit actually was my phone, that had an outdated password for the account and repeatedly tried to log into it unsuccessfully.

    – pat3d3r
    6 hours ago












  • 17





    Ask your email provider to make a change, that's the only options. In the meantime, open a new account and forward all emails to your new account so that you are still functional?

    – schroeder
    yesterday






  • 3





    Are you using one of the big email providers (Gmail, etc) or something smaller?

    – Anders
    22 hours ago






  • 3





    Get a better provider that isn't so vulnerable to this kind of trivial DoS?

    – Nate Eldredge
    16 hours ago






  • 1





    Maybe another account is under attack (Bank? Facebook? Income tax refund? Domain in your possession?), and they are taking out your email so you don't get notified.

    – jww
    15 hours ago












  • I had a similar experience with my account: The culprit actually was my phone, that had an outdated password for the account and repeatedly tried to log into it unsuccessfully.

    – pat3d3r
    6 hours ago







17




17





Ask your email provider to make a change, that's the only options. In the meantime, open a new account and forward all emails to your new account so that you are still functional?

– schroeder
yesterday





Ask your email provider to make a change, that's the only options. In the meantime, open a new account and forward all emails to your new account so that you are still functional?

– schroeder
yesterday




3




3





Are you using one of the big email providers (Gmail, etc) or something smaller?

– Anders
22 hours ago





Are you using one of the big email providers (Gmail, etc) or something smaller?

– Anders
22 hours ago




3




3





Get a better provider that isn't so vulnerable to this kind of trivial DoS?

– Nate Eldredge
16 hours ago





Get a better provider that isn't so vulnerable to this kind of trivial DoS?

– Nate Eldredge
16 hours ago




1




1





Maybe another account is under attack (Bank? Facebook? Income tax refund? Domain in your possession?), and they are taking out your email so you don't get notified.

– jww
15 hours ago






Maybe another account is under attack (Bank? Facebook? Income tax refund? Domain in your possession?), and they are taking out your email so you don't get notified.

– jww
15 hours ago














I had a similar experience with my account: The culprit actually was my phone, that had an outdated password for the account and repeatedly tried to log into it unsuccessfully.

– pat3d3r
6 hours ago





I had a similar experience with my account: The culprit actually was my phone, that had an outdated password for the account and repeatedly tried to log into it unsuccessfully.

– pat3d3r
6 hours ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















23














A few thoughts:



  • Usually my first recommendation would be to pick an extremely strong password. But you allready got that covered.

  • If there is two factor authentication available, turn it on. If you are lucky, it might make you an unattractive target and cause the attacker to move on.

  • If the account lock out doesn't affect other methods of reading your mail, like via IMAP, you could switch to that to maintain access. (To be honest, I don't know much about the security of IMAP, so you might want to consider that before turning it on.)

  • Forwarding the mail somewhere else will also ensure that you can read it even if your account is locked.

  • Finally, you can try contacting your email provider. I think your best bet here is to just describe the problem to them, and ask what they can do to help you.





share|improve this answer


















  • 3





    Would 2FA really help? The second factor isn't usually attemped until after a correct password is entered, and the attacker will never get that far.

    – Barmar
    20 hours ago






  • 1





    @Barmar I say "if you are lucky" for a reason. If the attacker, either a human or a bot, can detect that 2FA is on, it might give up. Or not. At least it don't hurt.

    – Anders
    20 hours ago






  • 2





    @Barmar If the attacker's script isn't written to try to enter anything on the second factor, it might prevent the lock out. Worth a try at least.

    – jpmc26
    19 hours ago







  • 2





    I think most 2FA systems don't prompt for the second factor until after you successfully pass the first.

    – Barmar
    18 hours ago






  • 2





    @Barmar Yes, that is true, but my advice still stands. There is a non zero chance it helps, the effort is near zero, the risk is zero, and you should probably do it anyway. So even if it probably doesn't help, you should still do it.

    – Anders
    8 hours ago


















19














No. That's pretty much the background noise of being on the internet.



From a random server I have with e-mail:



$ sudo grep -c "auth failed" /var/log/mail.log
1109


That's today. It's with fail2ban blocking more than five attempts from the same IP.






share|improve this answer


















  • 5





    This is not the same thing. He is referring to one specific account, not the complete authentication log for a mailserver. This is attempts at one specific user.

    – John Keates
    18 hours ago











  • True it is my account specifically - but I think vidario has it right in a general sense. My hosting company recently updated their implementation of csf, and I wonder if it’s too strict - I’ve been wondering if the attacks are nothing new - just a new policy of locking account after “x failed attempts in y minutes”...

    – clemdia
    11 hours ago



















7














Yeah, it's pretty easy to have your official email address forward your emails to a new "burner" email account. Then in the new email account setup, you set your From: field to your official email address. That way mails go out like this.



 From: account-I-always-had@oldserver.com
Subject: Re: so-and-so
In-Reply-To: <4735813474834434634@theirmail.com>
Sender: burneraccount@newserver.com


Or something like that.



Anyway, that lets you keep your identity at the official email address. The attacks on the login server are irrelevant to receiving and forwarding email.



As is evident from the above, your new email address may be obvious from headers so don't set up an autoresponder. Only correspond with people you trust. If this burner email account comes under attack, trash this burner account, setup another one, and tell the official email server to forward to the new burner.



Then, research who you sent mail to in the last 2 days to the last burner account. One of them compromised it. Use one tactic or another to trick them into attacking this or another burner account, that lets you distinguish who exactly did it.






share|improve this answer


















  • 2





    Or if possible, change username to be different from the address. This way you reply from the same address and have the same mailbox, but prevent account lockout.

    – Esa Jokinen
    11 hours ago






  • 1





    THIS (if only it were possible) - btw this experience has highlighted the lunacy of websites REQUIRING email address as username - just stupid.

    – clemdia
    10 hours ago







  • 1





    you might try using + to add a per domain suffix. then when you get spam it will (most likely) include who leaked your email. plus it becomes easy to block all emails that came from the domain

    – sudo rm -rf slash
    8 hours ago


















2














You can set a firewall before your server and with right configuration you can reduce brute force attempts.



You try with your MTA configuration, an example can be Postfix:



smtpd_client_restrictions =
permit_sasl_authenticated,
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org,
reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
reject_rbl_client cbl.abuseat.org,
reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org,
permit permit_mynetworks,
permit_inet_interfaces,





share|improve this answer























  • Are you assuming OP is running their own email server? I assumed the opposite, but now I am not sure what I think.

    – Anders
    8 hours ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "162"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






clemdia is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsecurity.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f206923%2femail-account-under-attack-really-anything-i-can-do%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes








4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









23














A few thoughts:



  • Usually my first recommendation would be to pick an extremely strong password. But you allready got that covered.

  • If there is two factor authentication available, turn it on. If you are lucky, it might make you an unattractive target and cause the attacker to move on.

  • If the account lock out doesn't affect other methods of reading your mail, like via IMAP, you could switch to that to maintain access. (To be honest, I don't know much about the security of IMAP, so you might want to consider that before turning it on.)

  • Forwarding the mail somewhere else will also ensure that you can read it even if your account is locked.

  • Finally, you can try contacting your email provider. I think your best bet here is to just describe the problem to them, and ask what they can do to help you.





share|improve this answer


















  • 3





    Would 2FA really help? The second factor isn't usually attemped until after a correct password is entered, and the attacker will never get that far.

    – Barmar
    20 hours ago






  • 1





    @Barmar I say "if you are lucky" for a reason. If the attacker, either a human or a bot, can detect that 2FA is on, it might give up. Or not. At least it don't hurt.

    – Anders
    20 hours ago






  • 2





    @Barmar If the attacker's script isn't written to try to enter anything on the second factor, it might prevent the lock out. Worth a try at least.

    – jpmc26
    19 hours ago







  • 2





    I think most 2FA systems don't prompt for the second factor until after you successfully pass the first.

    – Barmar
    18 hours ago






  • 2





    @Barmar Yes, that is true, but my advice still stands. There is a non zero chance it helps, the effort is near zero, the risk is zero, and you should probably do it anyway. So even if it probably doesn't help, you should still do it.

    – Anders
    8 hours ago















23














A few thoughts:



  • Usually my first recommendation would be to pick an extremely strong password. But you allready got that covered.

  • If there is two factor authentication available, turn it on. If you are lucky, it might make you an unattractive target and cause the attacker to move on.

  • If the account lock out doesn't affect other methods of reading your mail, like via IMAP, you could switch to that to maintain access. (To be honest, I don't know much about the security of IMAP, so you might want to consider that before turning it on.)

  • Forwarding the mail somewhere else will also ensure that you can read it even if your account is locked.

  • Finally, you can try contacting your email provider. I think your best bet here is to just describe the problem to them, and ask what they can do to help you.





share|improve this answer


















  • 3





    Would 2FA really help? The second factor isn't usually attemped until after a correct password is entered, and the attacker will never get that far.

    – Barmar
    20 hours ago






  • 1





    @Barmar I say "if you are lucky" for a reason. If the attacker, either a human or a bot, can detect that 2FA is on, it might give up. Or not. At least it don't hurt.

    – Anders
    20 hours ago






  • 2





    @Barmar If the attacker's script isn't written to try to enter anything on the second factor, it might prevent the lock out. Worth a try at least.

    – jpmc26
    19 hours ago







  • 2





    I think most 2FA systems don't prompt for the second factor until after you successfully pass the first.

    – Barmar
    18 hours ago






  • 2





    @Barmar Yes, that is true, but my advice still stands. There is a non zero chance it helps, the effort is near zero, the risk is zero, and you should probably do it anyway. So even if it probably doesn't help, you should still do it.

    – Anders
    8 hours ago













23












23








23







A few thoughts:



  • Usually my first recommendation would be to pick an extremely strong password. But you allready got that covered.

  • If there is two factor authentication available, turn it on. If you are lucky, it might make you an unattractive target and cause the attacker to move on.

  • If the account lock out doesn't affect other methods of reading your mail, like via IMAP, you could switch to that to maintain access. (To be honest, I don't know much about the security of IMAP, so you might want to consider that before turning it on.)

  • Forwarding the mail somewhere else will also ensure that you can read it even if your account is locked.

  • Finally, you can try contacting your email provider. I think your best bet here is to just describe the problem to them, and ask what they can do to help you.





share|improve this answer













A few thoughts:



  • Usually my first recommendation would be to pick an extremely strong password. But you allready got that covered.

  • If there is two factor authentication available, turn it on. If you are lucky, it might make you an unattractive target and cause the attacker to move on.

  • If the account lock out doesn't affect other methods of reading your mail, like via IMAP, you could switch to that to maintain access. (To be honest, I don't know much about the security of IMAP, so you might want to consider that before turning it on.)

  • Forwarding the mail somewhere else will also ensure that you can read it even if your account is locked.

  • Finally, you can try contacting your email provider. I think your best bet here is to just describe the problem to them, and ask what they can do to help you.






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 22 hours ago









AndersAnders

50.1k22143166




50.1k22143166







  • 3





    Would 2FA really help? The second factor isn't usually attemped until after a correct password is entered, and the attacker will never get that far.

    – Barmar
    20 hours ago






  • 1





    @Barmar I say "if you are lucky" for a reason. If the attacker, either a human or a bot, can detect that 2FA is on, it might give up. Or not. At least it don't hurt.

    – Anders
    20 hours ago






  • 2





    @Barmar If the attacker's script isn't written to try to enter anything on the second factor, it might prevent the lock out. Worth a try at least.

    – jpmc26
    19 hours ago







  • 2





    I think most 2FA systems don't prompt for the second factor until after you successfully pass the first.

    – Barmar
    18 hours ago






  • 2





    @Barmar Yes, that is true, but my advice still stands. There is a non zero chance it helps, the effort is near zero, the risk is zero, and you should probably do it anyway. So even if it probably doesn't help, you should still do it.

    – Anders
    8 hours ago












  • 3





    Would 2FA really help? The second factor isn't usually attemped until after a correct password is entered, and the attacker will never get that far.

    – Barmar
    20 hours ago






  • 1





    @Barmar I say "if you are lucky" for a reason. If the attacker, either a human or a bot, can detect that 2FA is on, it might give up. Or not. At least it don't hurt.

    – Anders
    20 hours ago






  • 2





    @Barmar If the attacker's script isn't written to try to enter anything on the second factor, it might prevent the lock out. Worth a try at least.

    – jpmc26
    19 hours ago







  • 2





    I think most 2FA systems don't prompt for the second factor until after you successfully pass the first.

    – Barmar
    18 hours ago






  • 2





    @Barmar Yes, that is true, but my advice still stands. There is a non zero chance it helps, the effort is near zero, the risk is zero, and you should probably do it anyway. So even if it probably doesn't help, you should still do it.

    – Anders
    8 hours ago







3




3





Would 2FA really help? The second factor isn't usually attemped until after a correct password is entered, and the attacker will never get that far.

– Barmar
20 hours ago





Would 2FA really help? The second factor isn't usually attemped until after a correct password is entered, and the attacker will never get that far.

– Barmar
20 hours ago




1




1





@Barmar I say "if you are lucky" for a reason. If the attacker, either a human or a bot, can detect that 2FA is on, it might give up. Or not. At least it don't hurt.

– Anders
20 hours ago





@Barmar I say "if you are lucky" for a reason. If the attacker, either a human or a bot, can detect that 2FA is on, it might give up. Or not. At least it don't hurt.

– Anders
20 hours ago




2




2





@Barmar If the attacker's script isn't written to try to enter anything on the second factor, it might prevent the lock out. Worth a try at least.

– jpmc26
19 hours ago






@Barmar If the attacker's script isn't written to try to enter anything on the second factor, it might prevent the lock out. Worth a try at least.

– jpmc26
19 hours ago





2




2





I think most 2FA systems don't prompt for the second factor until after you successfully pass the first.

– Barmar
18 hours ago





I think most 2FA systems don't prompt for the second factor until after you successfully pass the first.

– Barmar
18 hours ago




2




2





@Barmar Yes, that is true, but my advice still stands. There is a non zero chance it helps, the effort is near zero, the risk is zero, and you should probably do it anyway. So even if it probably doesn't help, you should still do it.

– Anders
8 hours ago





@Barmar Yes, that is true, but my advice still stands. There is a non zero chance it helps, the effort is near zero, the risk is zero, and you should probably do it anyway. So even if it probably doesn't help, you should still do it.

– Anders
8 hours ago













19














No. That's pretty much the background noise of being on the internet.



From a random server I have with e-mail:



$ sudo grep -c "auth failed" /var/log/mail.log
1109


That's today. It's with fail2ban blocking more than five attempts from the same IP.






share|improve this answer


















  • 5





    This is not the same thing. He is referring to one specific account, not the complete authentication log for a mailserver. This is attempts at one specific user.

    – John Keates
    18 hours ago











  • True it is my account specifically - but I think vidario has it right in a general sense. My hosting company recently updated their implementation of csf, and I wonder if it’s too strict - I’ve been wondering if the attacks are nothing new - just a new policy of locking account after “x failed attempts in y minutes”...

    – clemdia
    11 hours ago
















19














No. That's pretty much the background noise of being on the internet.



From a random server I have with e-mail:



$ sudo grep -c "auth failed" /var/log/mail.log
1109


That's today. It's with fail2ban blocking more than five attempts from the same IP.






share|improve this answer


















  • 5





    This is not the same thing. He is referring to one specific account, not the complete authentication log for a mailserver. This is attempts at one specific user.

    – John Keates
    18 hours ago











  • True it is my account specifically - but I think vidario has it right in a general sense. My hosting company recently updated their implementation of csf, and I wonder if it’s too strict - I’ve been wondering if the attacks are nothing new - just a new policy of locking account after “x failed attempts in y minutes”...

    – clemdia
    11 hours ago














19












19








19







No. That's pretty much the background noise of being on the internet.



From a random server I have with e-mail:



$ sudo grep -c "auth failed" /var/log/mail.log
1109


That's today. It's with fail2ban blocking more than five attempts from the same IP.






share|improve this answer













No. That's pretty much the background noise of being on the internet.



From a random server I have with e-mail:



$ sudo grep -c "auth failed" /var/log/mail.log
1109


That's today. It's with fail2ban blocking more than five attempts from the same IP.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 22 hours ago









vidarlovidarlo

3,674723




3,674723







  • 5





    This is not the same thing. He is referring to one specific account, not the complete authentication log for a mailserver. This is attempts at one specific user.

    – John Keates
    18 hours ago











  • True it is my account specifically - but I think vidario has it right in a general sense. My hosting company recently updated their implementation of csf, and I wonder if it’s too strict - I’ve been wondering if the attacks are nothing new - just a new policy of locking account after “x failed attempts in y minutes”...

    – clemdia
    11 hours ago













  • 5





    This is not the same thing. He is referring to one specific account, not the complete authentication log for a mailserver. This is attempts at one specific user.

    – John Keates
    18 hours ago











  • True it is my account specifically - but I think vidario has it right in a general sense. My hosting company recently updated their implementation of csf, and I wonder if it’s too strict - I’ve been wondering if the attacks are nothing new - just a new policy of locking account after “x failed attempts in y minutes”...

    – clemdia
    11 hours ago








5




5





This is not the same thing. He is referring to one specific account, not the complete authentication log for a mailserver. This is attempts at one specific user.

– John Keates
18 hours ago





This is not the same thing. He is referring to one specific account, not the complete authentication log for a mailserver. This is attempts at one specific user.

– John Keates
18 hours ago













True it is my account specifically - but I think vidario has it right in a general sense. My hosting company recently updated their implementation of csf, and I wonder if it’s too strict - I’ve been wondering if the attacks are nothing new - just a new policy of locking account after “x failed attempts in y minutes”...

– clemdia
11 hours ago






True it is my account specifically - but I think vidario has it right in a general sense. My hosting company recently updated their implementation of csf, and I wonder if it’s too strict - I’ve been wondering if the attacks are nothing new - just a new policy of locking account after “x failed attempts in y minutes”...

– clemdia
11 hours ago












7














Yeah, it's pretty easy to have your official email address forward your emails to a new "burner" email account. Then in the new email account setup, you set your From: field to your official email address. That way mails go out like this.



 From: account-I-always-had@oldserver.com
Subject: Re: so-and-so
In-Reply-To: <4735813474834434634@theirmail.com>
Sender: burneraccount@newserver.com


Or something like that.



Anyway, that lets you keep your identity at the official email address. The attacks on the login server are irrelevant to receiving and forwarding email.



As is evident from the above, your new email address may be obvious from headers so don't set up an autoresponder. Only correspond with people you trust. If this burner email account comes under attack, trash this burner account, setup another one, and tell the official email server to forward to the new burner.



Then, research who you sent mail to in the last 2 days to the last burner account. One of them compromised it. Use one tactic or another to trick them into attacking this or another burner account, that lets you distinguish who exactly did it.






share|improve this answer


















  • 2





    Or if possible, change username to be different from the address. This way you reply from the same address and have the same mailbox, but prevent account lockout.

    – Esa Jokinen
    11 hours ago






  • 1





    THIS (if only it were possible) - btw this experience has highlighted the lunacy of websites REQUIRING email address as username - just stupid.

    – clemdia
    10 hours ago







  • 1





    you might try using + to add a per domain suffix. then when you get spam it will (most likely) include who leaked your email. plus it becomes easy to block all emails that came from the domain

    – sudo rm -rf slash
    8 hours ago















7














Yeah, it's pretty easy to have your official email address forward your emails to a new "burner" email account. Then in the new email account setup, you set your From: field to your official email address. That way mails go out like this.



 From: account-I-always-had@oldserver.com
Subject: Re: so-and-so
In-Reply-To: <4735813474834434634@theirmail.com>
Sender: burneraccount@newserver.com


Or something like that.



Anyway, that lets you keep your identity at the official email address. The attacks on the login server are irrelevant to receiving and forwarding email.



As is evident from the above, your new email address may be obvious from headers so don't set up an autoresponder. Only correspond with people you trust. If this burner email account comes under attack, trash this burner account, setup another one, and tell the official email server to forward to the new burner.



Then, research who you sent mail to in the last 2 days to the last burner account. One of them compromised it. Use one tactic or another to trick them into attacking this or another burner account, that lets you distinguish who exactly did it.






share|improve this answer


















  • 2





    Or if possible, change username to be different from the address. This way you reply from the same address and have the same mailbox, but prevent account lockout.

    – Esa Jokinen
    11 hours ago






  • 1





    THIS (if only it were possible) - btw this experience has highlighted the lunacy of websites REQUIRING email address as username - just stupid.

    – clemdia
    10 hours ago







  • 1





    you might try using + to add a per domain suffix. then when you get spam it will (most likely) include who leaked your email. plus it becomes easy to block all emails that came from the domain

    – sudo rm -rf slash
    8 hours ago













7












7








7







Yeah, it's pretty easy to have your official email address forward your emails to a new "burner" email account. Then in the new email account setup, you set your From: field to your official email address. That way mails go out like this.



 From: account-I-always-had@oldserver.com
Subject: Re: so-and-so
In-Reply-To: <4735813474834434634@theirmail.com>
Sender: burneraccount@newserver.com


Or something like that.



Anyway, that lets you keep your identity at the official email address. The attacks on the login server are irrelevant to receiving and forwarding email.



As is evident from the above, your new email address may be obvious from headers so don't set up an autoresponder. Only correspond with people you trust. If this burner email account comes under attack, trash this burner account, setup another one, and tell the official email server to forward to the new burner.



Then, research who you sent mail to in the last 2 days to the last burner account. One of them compromised it. Use one tactic or another to trick them into attacking this or another burner account, that lets you distinguish who exactly did it.






share|improve this answer













Yeah, it's pretty easy to have your official email address forward your emails to a new "burner" email account. Then in the new email account setup, you set your From: field to your official email address. That way mails go out like this.



 From: account-I-always-had@oldserver.com
Subject: Re: so-and-so
In-Reply-To: <4735813474834434634@theirmail.com>
Sender: burneraccount@newserver.com


Or something like that.



Anyway, that lets you keep your identity at the official email address. The attacks on the login server are irrelevant to receiving and forwarding email.



As is evident from the above, your new email address may be obvious from headers so don't set up an autoresponder. Only correspond with people you trust. If this burner email account comes under attack, trash this burner account, setup another one, and tell the official email server to forward to the new burner.



Then, research who you sent mail to in the last 2 days to the last burner account. One of them compromised it. Use one tactic or another to trick them into attacking this or another burner account, that lets you distinguish who exactly did it.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 20 hours ago









HarperHarper

2,100413




2,100413







  • 2





    Or if possible, change username to be different from the address. This way you reply from the same address and have the same mailbox, but prevent account lockout.

    – Esa Jokinen
    11 hours ago






  • 1





    THIS (if only it were possible) - btw this experience has highlighted the lunacy of websites REQUIRING email address as username - just stupid.

    – clemdia
    10 hours ago







  • 1





    you might try using + to add a per domain suffix. then when you get spam it will (most likely) include who leaked your email. plus it becomes easy to block all emails that came from the domain

    – sudo rm -rf slash
    8 hours ago












  • 2





    Or if possible, change username to be different from the address. This way you reply from the same address and have the same mailbox, but prevent account lockout.

    – Esa Jokinen
    11 hours ago






  • 1





    THIS (if only it were possible) - btw this experience has highlighted the lunacy of websites REQUIRING email address as username - just stupid.

    – clemdia
    10 hours ago







  • 1





    you might try using + to add a per domain suffix. then when you get spam it will (most likely) include who leaked your email. plus it becomes easy to block all emails that came from the domain

    – sudo rm -rf slash
    8 hours ago







2




2





Or if possible, change username to be different from the address. This way you reply from the same address and have the same mailbox, but prevent account lockout.

– Esa Jokinen
11 hours ago





Or if possible, change username to be different from the address. This way you reply from the same address and have the same mailbox, but prevent account lockout.

– Esa Jokinen
11 hours ago




1




1





THIS (if only it were possible) - btw this experience has highlighted the lunacy of websites REQUIRING email address as username - just stupid.

– clemdia
10 hours ago






THIS (if only it were possible) - btw this experience has highlighted the lunacy of websites REQUIRING email address as username - just stupid.

– clemdia
10 hours ago





1




1





you might try using + to add a per domain suffix. then when you get spam it will (most likely) include who leaked your email. plus it becomes easy to block all emails that came from the domain

– sudo rm -rf slash
8 hours ago





you might try using + to add a per domain suffix. then when you get spam it will (most likely) include who leaked your email. plus it becomes easy to block all emails that came from the domain

– sudo rm -rf slash
8 hours ago











2














You can set a firewall before your server and with right configuration you can reduce brute force attempts.



You try with your MTA configuration, an example can be Postfix:



smtpd_client_restrictions =
permit_sasl_authenticated,
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org,
reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
reject_rbl_client cbl.abuseat.org,
reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org,
permit permit_mynetworks,
permit_inet_interfaces,





share|improve this answer























  • Are you assuming OP is running their own email server? I assumed the opposite, but now I am not sure what I think.

    – Anders
    8 hours ago















2














You can set a firewall before your server and with right configuration you can reduce brute force attempts.



You try with your MTA configuration, an example can be Postfix:



smtpd_client_restrictions =
permit_sasl_authenticated,
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org,
reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
reject_rbl_client cbl.abuseat.org,
reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org,
permit permit_mynetworks,
permit_inet_interfaces,





share|improve this answer























  • Are you assuming OP is running their own email server? I assumed the opposite, but now I am not sure what I think.

    – Anders
    8 hours ago













2












2








2







You can set a firewall before your server and with right configuration you can reduce brute force attempts.



You try with your MTA configuration, an example can be Postfix:



smtpd_client_restrictions =
permit_sasl_authenticated,
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org,
reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
reject_rbl_client cbl.abuseat.org,
reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org,
permit permit_mynetworks,
permit_inet_interfaces,





share|improve this answer













You can set a firewall before your server and with right configuration you can reduce brute force attempts.



You try with your MTA configuration, an example can be Postfix:



smtpd_client_restrictions =
permit_sasl_authenticated,
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org,
reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
reject_rbl_client cbl.abuseat.org,
reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org,
permit permit_mynetworks,
permit_inet_interfaces,






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 11 hours ago









MirsadMirsad

6,72352348




6,72352348












  • Are you assuming OP is running their own email server? I assumed the opposite, but now I am not sure what I think.

    – Anders
    8 hours ago

















  • Are you assuming OP is running their own email server? I assumed the opposite, but now I am not sure what I think.

    – Anders
    8 hours ago
















Are you assuming OP is running their own email server? I assumed the opposite, but now I am not sure what I think.

– Anders
8 hours ago





Are you assuming OP is running their own email server? I assumed the opposite, but now I am not sure what I think.

– Anders
8 hours ago










clemdia is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















clemdia is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












clemdia is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











clemdia is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














Thanks for contributing an answer to Information Security Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsecurity.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f206923%2femail-account-under-attack-really-anything-i-can-do%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Reverse int within the 32-bit signed integer range: [−2^31, 2^31 − 1]Combining two 32-bit integers into one 64-bit integerDetermine if an int is within rangeLossy packing 32 bit integer to 16 bitComputing the square root of a 64-bit integerKeeping integer addition within boundsSafe multiplication of two 64-bit signed integersLeetcode 10: Regular Expression MatchingSigned integer-to-ascii x86_64 assembler macroReverse the digits of an Integer“Add two numbers given in reverse order from a linked list”

Category:Fedor von Bock Media in category "Fedor von Bock"Navigation menuUpload mediaISNI: 0000 0000 5511 3417VIAF ID: 24712551GND ID: 119294796Library of Congress authority ID: n96068363BnF ID: 12534305fSUDOC authorities ID: 034604189Open Library ID: OL338253ANKCR AUT ID: jn19990000869National Library of Israel ID: 000514068National Thesaurus for Author Names ID: 341574317ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

Kiel Indholdsfortegnelse Historie | Transport og færgeforbindelser | Sejlsport og anden sport | Kultur | Kendte personer fra Kiel | Noter | Litteratur | Eksterne henvisninger | Navigationsmenuwww.kiel.de54°19′31″N 10°8′26″Ø / 54.32528°N 10.14056°Ø / 54.32528; 10.14056Oberbürgermeister Dr. Ulf Kämpferwww.statistik-nord.deDen danske Stats StatistikKiels hjemmesiderrrWorldCat312794080n790547494030481-4