Prove that NP is closed under karp reduction?Space(n) not closed under Karp reductions - what about NTime(n)?Class P is closed under rotation?Prove or disprove that $NL$ is closed under polynomial many-one reductions$mathbfNC_2$ is closed under log-space reductionOn Karp reductionwhen can I know if a class (complexity) is closed under reduction (cook/karp)Check if class $PSPACE$ is closed under polyonomially space reductionIs NPSPACE also closed under polynomial-time reduction and under log-space reduction?Prove PSPACE is closed under complement?Prove PSPACE is closed under union?

How is the claim "I am in New York only if I am in America" the same as "If I am in New York, then I am in America?

Continuity at a point in terms of closure

How long does it take to type this?

declaring a variable twice in IIFE

I’m planning on buying a laser printer but concerned about the life cycle of toner in the machine

Do any Labour MPs support no-deal?

A Journey Through Space and Time

When blogging recipes, how can I support both readers who want the narrative/journey and ones who want the printer-friendly recipe?

Email Account under attack (really) - anything I can do?

GPS Rollover on Android Smartphones

What are these boxed doors outside store fronts in New York?

Why is an old chain unsafe?

Why Is Death Allowed In the Matrix?

If Manufacturer spice model and Datasheet give different values which should I use?

How is it possible to have an ability score that is less than 3?

How can the DM most effectively choose 1 out of an odd number of players to be targeted by an attack or effect?

Is the language p and n are natural numbers and there's no prime number in [p,p+n] belongs to NP class?

Book about a traveler who helps planets in need

Motorized valve interfering with button?

What do you call something that goes against the spirit of the law, but is legal when interpreting the law to the letter?

What defenses are there against being summoned by the Gate spell?

How to get the available space of $HOME as a variable in shell scripting?

How can I automatically replace [[ and ]] with the [LeftDoubleBracket] and [RightDoubleBracket] operators?

Why are only specific transaction types accepted into the mempool?



Prove that NP is closed under karp reduction?


Space(n) not closed under Karp reductions - what about NTime(n)?Class P is closed under rotation?Prove or disprove that $NL$ is closed under polynomial many-one reductions$mathbfNC_2$ is closed under log-space reductionOn Karp reductionwhen can I know if a class (complexity) is closed under reduction (cook/karp)Check if class $PSPACE$ is closed under polyonomially space reductionIs NPSPACE also closed under polynomial-time reduction and under log-space reduction?Prove PSPACE is closed under complement?Prove PSPACE is closed under union?













3












$begingroup$


A complexity class $mathbbC$ is said to be closed under a reduction if:



$A$ reduces to $B$ and $B in mathbbC$ $implies$ $A in mathbbC$



How would you go about proving this if $mathbbC = NP$ and the reduction to be the karp reduction? i.e.



Prove that if $A$ karp reduces to $B$ and $B in NP$ $implies$ $A in NP$










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Try using the definitions.
    $endgroup$
    – Yuval Filmus
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    @YuvalFilmus thanks for the advice, this helped me figure it out!
    $endgroup$
    – Ankit Bahl
    yesterday















3












$begingroup$


A complexity class $mathbbC$ is said to be closed under a reduction if:



$A$ reduces to $B$ and $B in mathbbC$ $implies$ $A in mathbbC$



How would you go about proving this if $mathbbC = NP$ and the reduction to be the karp reduction? i.e.



Prove that if $A$ karp reduces to $B$ and $B in NP$ $implies$ $A in NP$










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Try using the definitions.
    $endgroup$
    – Yuval Filmus
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    @YuvalFilmus thanks for the advice, this helped me figure it out!
    $endgroup$
    – Ankit Bahl
    yesterday













3












3








3





$begingroup$


A complexity class $mathbbC$ is said to be closed under a reduction if:



$A$ reduces to $B$ and $B in mathbbC$ $implies$ $A in mathbbC$



How would you go about proving this if $mathbbC = NP$ and the reduction to be the karp reduction? i.e.



Prove that if $A$ karp reduces to $B$ and $B in NP$ $implies$ $A in NP$










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




A complexity class $mathbbC$ is said to be closed under a reduction if:



$A$ reduces to $B$ and $B in mathbbC$ $implies$ $A in mathbbC$



How would you go about proving this if $mathbbC = NP$ and the reduction to be the karp reduction? i.e.



Prove that if $A$ karp reduces to $B$ and $B in NP$ $implies$ $A in NP$







complexity-theory






share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question






New contributor




Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









Ankit BahlAnkit Bahl

663




663




New contributor




Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Try using the definitions.
    $endgroup$
    – Yuval Filmus
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    @YuvalFilmus thanks for the advice, this helped me figure it out!
    $endgroup$
    – Ankit Bahl
    yesterday












  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Try using the definitions.
    $endgroup$
    – Yuval Filmus
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    @YuvalFilmus thanks for the advice, this helped me figure it out!
    $endgroup$
    – Ankit Bahl
    yesterday







3




3




$begingroup$
Try using the definitions.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
yesterday




$begingroup$
Try using the definitions.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
yesterday












$begingroup$
@YuvalFilmus thanks for the advice, this helped me figure it out!
$endgroup$
– Ankit Bahl
yesterday




$begingroup$
@YuvalFilmus thanks for the advice, this helped me figure it out!
$endgroup$
– Ankit Bahl
yesterday










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

I was able to figure it out. In case anyone was wondering:



$B in NP$ means that there exists a non-deterministic polynomial time algorithm for $B$. Let's call that $b(i)$, where i is the input to $B$.



$A$ karp reducing to $B implies$ that there exists a function $m$ such that $m$ can take an input $i$ to $A$ and map it to some input $m(i)$ for $B$, and if an instance of $i$ is true for $A$ then $m(i)$ is true for B (and vice versa),



Therefore, an algorithm for $A$ can be made as follows:



$A (i)$



  1. Take input $i$ and apply $m$ to yield $m(i)$

  2. Apply $b$ with input $m(i)$

This yields an output for $A$. Since both $m$ and $b$ are non-deterministic polynomial time, this algorithm is non-deterministic polynomial time. Therefore $A$ must be in NP.






share|cite|improve this answer








New contributor




Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "419"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    Ankit Bahl is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f106574%2fprove-that-np-is-closed-under-karp-reduction%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5












    $begingroup$

    I was able to figure it out. In case anyone was wondering:



    $B in NP$ means that there exists a non-deterministic polynomial time algorithm for $B$. Let's call that $b(i)$, where i is the input to $B$.



    $A$ karp reducing to $B implies$ that there exists a function $m$ such that $m$ can take an input $i$ to $A$ and map it to some input $m(i)$ for $B$, and if an instance of $i$ is true for $A$ then $m(i)$ is true for B (and vice versa),



    Therefore, an algorithm for $A$ can be made as follows:



    $A (i)$



    1. Take input $i$ and apply $m$ to yield $m(i)$

    2. Apply $b$ with input $m(i)$

    This yields an output for $A$. Since both $m$ and $b$ are non-deterministic polynomial time, this algorithm is non-deterministic polynomial time. Therefore $A$ must be in NP.






    share|cite|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$

















      5












      $begingroup$

      I was able to figure it out. In case anyone was wondering:



      $B in NP$ means that there exists a non-deterministic polynomial time algorithm for $B$. Let's call that $b(i)$, where i is the input to $B$.



      $A$ karp reducing to $B implies$ that there exists a function $m$ such that $m$ can take an input $i$ to $A$ and map it to some input $m(i)$ for $B$, and if an instance of $i$ is true for $A$ then $m(i)$ is true for B (and vice versa),



      Therefore, an algorithm for $A$ can be made as follows:



      $A (i)$



      1. Take input $i$ and apply $m$ to yield $m(i)$

      2. Apply $b$ with input $m(i)$

      This yields an output for $A$. Since both $m$ and $b$ are non-deterministic polynomial time, this algorithm is non-deterministic polynomial time. Therefore $A$ must be in NP.






      share|cite|improve this answer








      New contributor




      Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      $endgroup$















        5












        5








        5





        $begingroup$

        I was able to figure it out. In case anyone was wondering:



        $B in NP$ means that there exists a non-deterministic polynomial time algorithm for $B$. Let's call that $b(i)$, where i is the input to $B$.



        $A$ karp reducing to $B implies$ that there exists a function $m$ such that $m$ can take an input $i$ to $A$ and map it to some input $m(i)$ for $B$, and if an instance of $i$ is true for $A$ then $m(i)$ is true for B (and vice versa),



        Therefore, an algorithm for $A$ can be made as follows:



        $A (i)$



        1. Take input $i$ and apply $m$ to yield $m(i)$

        2. Apply $b$ with input $m(i)$

        This yields an output for $A$. Since both $m$ and $b$ are non-deterministic polynomial time, this algorithm is non-deterministic polynomial time. Therefore $A$ must be in NP.






        share|cite|improve this answer








        New contributor




        Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        $endgroup$



        I was able to figure it out. In case anyone was wondering:



        $B in NP$ means that there exists a non-deterministic polynomial time algorithm for $B$. Let's call that $b(i)$, where i is the input to $B$.



        $A$ karp reducing to $B implies$ that there exists a function $m$ such that $m$ can take an input $i$ to $A$ and map it to some input $m(i)$ for $B$, and if an instance of $i$ is true for $A$ then $m(i)$ is true for B (and vice versa),



        Therefore, an algorithm for $A$ can be made as follows:



        $A (i)$



        1. Take input $i$ and apply $m$ to yield $m(i)$

        2. Apply $b$ with input $m(i)$

        This yields an output for $A$. Since both $m$ and $b$ are non-deterministic polynomial time, this algorithm is non-deterministic polynomial time. Therefore $A$ must be in NP.







        share|cite|improve this answer








        New contributor




        Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer






        New contributor




        Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        answered yesterday









        Ankit BahlAnkit Bahl

        663




        663




        New contributor




        Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





        New contributor





        Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.




















            Ankit Bahl is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Ankit Bahl is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Ankit Bahl is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            Ankit Bahl is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to Computer Science Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f106574%2fprove-that-np-is-closed-under-karp-reduction%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Reverse int within the 32-bit signed integer range: [−2^31, 2^31 − 1]Combining two 32-bit integers into one 64-bit integerDetermine if an int is within rangeLossy packing 32 bit integer to 16 bitComputing the square root of a 64-bit integerKeeping integer addition within boundsSafe multiplication of two 64-bit signed integersLeetcode 10: Regular Expression MatchingSigned integer-to-ascii x86_64 assembler macroReverse the digits of an Integer“Add two numbers given in reverse order from a linked list”

            Category:Fedor von Bock Media in category "Fedor von Bock"Navigation menuUpload mediaISNI: 0000 0000 5511 3417VIAF ID: 24712551GND ID: 119294796Library of Congress authority ID: n96068363BnF ID: 12534305fSUDOC authorities ID: 034604189Open Library ID: OL338253ANKCR AUT ID: jn19990000869National Library of Israel ID: 000514068National Thesaurus for Author Names ID: 341574317ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

            Kiel Indholdsfortegnelse Historie | Transport og færgeforbindelser | Sejlsport og anden sport | Kultur | Kendte personer fra Kiel | Noter | Litteratur | Eksterne henvisninger | Navigationsmenuwww.kiel.de54°19′31″N 10°8′26″Ø / 54.32528°N 10.14056°Ø / 54.32528; 10.14056Oberbürgermeister Dr. Ulf Kämpferwww.statistik-nord.deDen danske Stats StatistikKiels hjemmesiderrrWorldCat312794080n790547494030481-4