Percent Dissociated from Titration Curve The Next CEO of Stack OverflowVolume required to dilute solution for a pH changeHow to calculate the composition of a borate buffer with a defined pH using the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation?Titration of alpha-amino acid with strong baseWhy do these two calculations give me different answers for the same acid-base titration?Titration of NaOH with acetic acidUnderstanding how to calculate the pH of a buffer with ice tablesTitration with Ca(OH)2calculating ph of a mixture of acidsFinding the concentration of hydrochloric acid by titrationWhy does pH increase as a weak acid becomes more dissociated?

Percent Dissociated from Titration Curve

Noise during hard braking

Is there a rule of thumb for determining the amount one should accept for of a settlement offer?

Is it OK to decorate a log book cover?

The sum of any ten consecutive numbers from a fibonacci sequence is divisible by 11

Are British MPs missing the point, with these 'Indicative Votes'?

Ising model simulation

Horror film about a man brought out of cryogenic suspension without a soul, around 1990

Could you use a laser beam as a modulated carrier wave for radio signal?

How can the PCs determine if an item is a phylactery?

What happens if you break a law in another country outside of that country?

Why do we say “un seul M” and not “une seule M” even though M is a “consonne”?

Is the offspring between a demon and a celestial possible? If so what is it called and is it in a book somewhere?

Fastest algorithm to decide whether a (always halting) TM accepts a general string

Words hidden in my phone number

What does it mean 'exit 1' for a job status after rclone sync

Does the Idaho Potato Commission associate potato skins with healthy eating?

Small nick on power cord from an electric alarm clock, and copper wiring exposed but intact

What is the difference between 'contrib' and 'non-free' packages repositories?

Creating a script with console commands

How do I secure a TV wall mount?

Is it possible to create a QR code using text?

"Eavesdropping" vs "Listen in on"

Strange use of "whether ... than ..." in official text



Percent Dissociated from Titration Curve



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowVolume required to dilute solution for a pH changeHow to calculate the composition of a borate buffer with a defined pH using the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation?Titration of alpha-amino acid with strong baseWhy do these two calculations give me different answers for the same acid-base titration?Titration of NaOH with acetic acidUnderstanding how to calculate the pH of a buffer with ice tablesTitration with Ca(OH)2calculating ph of a mixture of acidsFinding the concentration of hydrochloric acid by titrationWhy does pH increase as a weak acid becomes more dissociated?










2












$begingroup$


enter image description here



Question 818 references the titration curve. Answer is A because $ceH+$ conc $= 10^-4$. This is conc of dissociated acid. The conc of the undissociated acid is the original concentration minus this: $0.1 - 0.0001$, which is about $0.1$. So then its $frac0.00010.1times 100 = 0.1%$.



Where in the world are they getting the original concentration? how did they get $0.1$ as the concentration of undissociated acid?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    2












    $begingroup$


    enter image description here



    Question 818 references the titration curve. Answer is A because $ceH+$ conc $= 10^-4$. This is conc of dissociated acid. The conc of the undissociated acid is the original concentration minus this: $0.1 - 0.0001$, which is about $0.1$. So then its $frac0.00010.1times 100 = 0.1%$.



    Where in the world are they getting the original concentration? how did they get $0.1$ as the concentration of undissociated acid?










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      enter image description here



      Question 818 references the titration curve. Answer is A because $ceH+$ conc $= 10^-4$. This is conc of dissociated acid. The conc of the undissociated acid is the original concentration minus this: $0.1 - 0.0001$, which is about $0.1$. So then its $frac0.00010.1times 100 = 0.1%$.



      Where in the world are they getting the original concentration? how did they get $0.1$ as the concentration of undissociated acid?










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      enter image description here



      Question 818 references the titration curve. Answer is A because $ceH+$ conc $= 10^-4$. This is conc of dissociated acid. The conc of the undissociated acid is the original concentration minus this: $0.1 - 0.0001$, which is about $0.1$. So then its $frac0.00010.1times 100 = 0.1%$.



      Where in the world are they getting the original concentration? how did they get $0.1$ as the concentration of undissociated acid?







      acid-base aqueous-solution analytical-chemistry titration






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 4 hours ago









      Mathew Mahindaratne

      5,899623




      5,899623










      asked 7 hours ago









      JonJon

      232




      232




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5












          $begingroup$

          I'm not sure I follow your logic.
          For a monobasic acid S $(ceHA)$ dissociation degree $α$ is



          $$α = frac[ceH+]c_mathrma,$$



          where $c_mathrma$ is the initial concentration of the acid which you are determining via titration with the defined volume of a strong base $V_mathrmb$:



          $$c_mathrmaV_mathrma = c_mathrmbV_mathrmb implies c_mathrma = fracc_mathrmbV_mathrmbV_mathrma$$



          Finally, taking $V_mathrma = V_mathrmb = pu50 mL$ (from the figure's caption and equilibrium point) and, as you already assumed from pH, $[ceH+] approx pu1e-4 mol L-1$:



          $$α = frac[ceH+]V_mathrmac_mathrmbV_mathrmb = fracpu1e-4 mol L-1cdotpu50 mLpu0.1 mol L-1cdotpu50 mL = pu1e-3~textor~0.1%$$






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Thank you! I appreciate your help. I seem to have missed the entire purpose of the titration... so the idea is that you are setting the molar amount of base to the molar amount of acid specifically at the equivalence point, then solving for the original concentration of acid. then you divide the hydrogen ion concentration by this value
            $endgroup$
            – Jon
            6 hours ago












          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "431"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f111939%2fpercent-dissociated-from-titration-curve%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          5












          $begingroup$

          I'm not sure I follow your logic.
          For a monobasic acid S $(ceHA)$ dissociation degree $α$ is



          $$α = frac[ceH+]c_mathrma,$$



          where $c_mathrma$ is the initial concentration of the acid which you are determining via titration with the defined volume of a strong base $V_mathrmb$:



          $$c_mathrmaV_mathrma = c_mathrmbV_mathrmb implies c_mathrma = fracc_mathrmbV_mathrmbV_mathrma$$



          Finally, taking $V_mathrma = V_mathrmb = pu50 mL$ (from the figure's caption and equilibrium point) and, as you already assumed from pH, $[ceH+] approx pu1e-4 mol L-1$:



          $$α = frac[ceH+]V_mathrmac_mathrmbV_mathrmb = fracpu1e-4 mol L-1cdotpu50 mLpu0.1 mol L-1cdotpu50 mL = pu1e-3~textor~0.1%$$






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Thank you! I appreciate your help. I seem to have missed the entire purpose of the titration... so the idea is that you are setting the molar amount of base to the molar amount of acid specifically at the equivalence point, then solving for the original concentration of acid. then you divide the hydrogen ion concentration by this value
            $endgroup$
            – Jon
            6 hours ago
















          5












          $begingroup$

          I'm not sure I follow your logic.
          For a monobasic acid S $(ceHA)$ dissociation degree $α$ is



          $$α = frac[ceH+]c_mathrma,$$



          where $c_mathrma$ is the initial concentration of the acid which you are determining via titration with the defined volume of a strong base $V_mathrmb$:



          $$c_mathrmaV_mathrma = c_mathrmbV_mathrmb implies c_mathrma = fracc_mathrmbV_mathrmbV_mathrma$$



          Finally, taking $V_mathrma = V_mathrmb = pu50 mL$ (from the figure's caption and equilibrium point) and, as you already assumed from pH, $[ceH+] approx pu1e-4 mol L-1$:



          $$α = frac[ceH+]V_mathrmac_mathrmbV_mathrmb = fracpu1e-4 mol L-1cdotpu50 mLpu0.1 mol L-1cdotpu50 mL = pu1e-3~textor~0.1%$$






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Thank you! I appreciate your help. I seem to have missed the entire purpose of the titration... so the idea is that you are setting the molar amount of base to the molar amount of acid specifically at the equivalence point, then solving for the original concentration of acid. then you divide the hydrogen ion concentration by this value
            $endgroup$
            – Jon
            6 hours ago














          5












          5








          5





          $begingroup$

          I'm not sure I follow your logic.
          For a monobasic acid S $(ceHA)$ dissociation degree $α$ is



          $$α = frac[ceH+]c_mathrma,$$



          where $c_mathrma$ is the initial concentration of the acid which you are determining via titration with the defined volume of a strong base $V_mathrmb$:



          $$c_mathrmaV_mathrma = c_mathrmbV_mathrmb implies c_mathrma = fracc_mathrmbV_mathrmbV_mathrma$$



          Finally, taking $V_mathrma = V_mathrmb = pu50 mL$ (from the figure's caption and equilibrium point) and, as you already assumed from pH, $[ceH+] approx pu1e-4 mol L-1$:



          $$α = frac[ceH+]V_mathrmac_mathrmbV_mathrmb = fracpu1e-4 mol L-1cdotpu50 mLpu0.1 mol L-1cdotpu50 mL = pu1e-3~textor~0.1%$$






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          I'm not sure I follow your logic.
          For a monobasic acid S $(ceHA)$ dissociation degree $α$ is



          $$α = frac[ceH+]c_mathrma,$$



          where $c_mathrma$ is the initial concentration of the acid which you are determining via titration with the defined volume of a strong base $V_mathrmb$:



          $$c_mathrmaV_mathrma = c_mathrmbV_mathrmb implies c_mathrma = fracc_mathrmbV_mathrmbV_mathrma$$



          Finally, taking $V_mathrma = V_mathrmb = pu50 mL$ (from the figure's caption and equilibrium point) and, as you already assumed from pH, $[ceH+] approx pu1e-4 mol L-1$:



          $$α = frac[ceH+]V_mathrmac_mathrmbV_mathrmb = fracpu1e-4 mol L-1cdotpu50 mLpu0.1 mol L-1cdotpu50 mL = pu1e-3~textor~0.1%$$







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 6 hours ago









          andseliskandselisk

          18.9k660124




          18.9k660124







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Thank you! I appreciate your help. I seem to have missed the entire purpose of the titration... so the idea is that you are setting the molar amount of base to the molar amount of acid specifically at the equivalence point, then solving for the original concentration of acid. then you divide the hydrogen ion concentration by this value
            $endgroup$
            – Jon
            6 hours ago













          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Thank you! I appreciate your help. I seem to have missed the entire purpose of the titration... so the idea is that you are setting the molar amount of base to the molar amount of acid specifically at the equivalence point, then solving for the original concentration of acid. then you divide the hydrogen ion concentration by this value
            $endgroup$
            – Jon
            6 hours ago








          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          Thank you! I appreciate your help. I seem to have missed the entire purpose of the titration... so the idea is that you are setting the molar amount of base to the molar amount of acid specifically at the equivalence point, then solving for the original concentration of acid. then you divide the hydrogen ion concentration by this value
          $endgroup$
          – Jon
          6 hours ago





          $begingroup$
          Thank you! I appreciate your help. I seem to have missed the entire purpose of the titration... so the idea is that you are setting the molar amount of base to the molar amount of acid specifically at the equivalence point, then solving for the original concentration of acid. then you divide the hydrogen ion concentration by this value
          $endgroup$
          – Jon
          6 hours ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Chemistry Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f111939%2fpercent-dissociated-from-titration-curve%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Category:Fedor von Bock Media in category "Fedor von Bock"Navigation menuUpload mediaISNI: 0000 0000 5511 3417VIAF ID: 24712551GND ID: 119294796Library of Congress authority ID: n96068363BnF ID: 12534305fSUDOC authorities ID: 034604189Open Library ID: OL338253ANKCR AUT ID: jn19990000869National Library of Israel ID: 000514068National Thesaurus for Author Names ID: 341574317ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

          Reverse int within the 32-bit signed integer range: [−2^31, 2^31 − 1]Combining two 32-bit integers into one 64-bit integerDetermine if an int is within rangeLossy packing 32 bit integer to 16 bitComputing the square root of a 64-bit integerKeeping integer addition within boundsSafe multiplication of two 64-bit signed integersLeetcode 10: Regular Expression MatchingSigned integer-to-ascii x86_64 assembler macroReverse the digits of an Integer“Add two numbers given in reverse order from a linked list”

          Kiel Indholdsfortegnelse Historie | Transport og færgeforbindelser | Sejlsport og anden sport | Kultur | Kendte personer fra Kiel | Noter | Litteratur | Eksterne henvisninger | Navigationsmenuwww.kiel.de54°19′31″N 10°8′26″Ø / 54.32528°N 10.14056°Ø / 54.32528; 10.14056Oberbürgermeister Dr. Ulf Kämpferwww.statistik-nord.deDen danske Stats StatistikKiels hjemmesiderrrWorldCat312794080n790547494030481-4