Should a wizard buy fine inks every time he want to copy spells into his spellbook? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Are the “fine inks” a wizard needs to copy a spell the same as the “rare inks” a warlock needs to copy a ritual?What exactly are the sources from which you can copy spells into a Book of Shadows?Can I copy prepared Cleric spells that are also on the Wizard spell list into my spellbook?From what items can a wizard learn his spells?Can a Wizard “reverse-engineer” a magic item to copy the spell into his spellbook?Can an Arcane Trickster copy a Wizard spell from a scroll into their “spellbook”?Can a Wizard identify the spells in another spellbook without copying them into their own?Can a wizard copy arcane spells into his spellbook from other classes?Total time to copy a spell from a spellbook?When a wizard copies a new spell into his spellbook, it costs 50 gp. Where does that money go?

What is this round thing on the pantry door in The Shining

Is it possible for SQL statements to execute concurrently within a single session in SQL Server?

Is CEO the "profession" with the most psychopaths?

Why limits give us the exact value of the slope of the tangent line?

How often does castling occur in grandmaster games?

A letter with no particular backstory

Is there hard evidence that the grant peer review system performs significantly better than random?

Did any compiler fully use 80-bit floating point?

How do living politicians protect their readily obtainable signatures from misuse?

Strange behavior of Object.defineProperty() in JavaScript

How can I best take pictures of a moving speaker in a dark room with accent lights?

Converted a Scalar function to a TVF function for parallel execution-Still running in Serial mode

Antipodal Land Area Calculation

Movie where a circus ringmaster turns people into animals

Semigroups with no morphisms between them

Take 2! Is this homebrew Lady of Pain warlock patron balanced?

Has negative voting ever been officially implemented in elections, or seriously proposed, or even studied?

Significance of Cersei's obsession with elephants?

Is it possible to force a specific program to remain in memory after closing it?

Did Mueller's report provide an evidentiary basis for the claim of Russian govt election interference via social media?

How can I prevent/balance waiting and turtling as a response to cooldown mechanics

How to pronounce 伝統色

How much damage would a cupful of neutron star matter do to the Earth?

File name problem(?)



Should a wizard buy fine inks every time he want to copy spells into his spellbook?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Are the “fine inks” a wizard needs to copy a spell the same as the “rare inks” a warlock needs to copy a ritual?What exactly are the sources from which you can copy spells into a Book of Shadows?Can I copy prepared Cleric spells that are also on the Wizard spell list into my spellbook?From what items can a wizard learn his spells?Can a Wizard “reverse-engineer” a magic item to copy the spell into his spellbook?Can an Arcane Trickster copy a Wizard spell from a scroll into their “spellbook”?Can a Wizard identify the spells in another spellbook without copying them into their own?Can a wizard copy arcane spells into his spellbook from other classes?Total time to copy a spell from a spellbook?When a wizard copies a new spell into his spellbook, it costs 50 gp. Where does that money go?



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








4












$begingroup$


PHB says that Wizards should use 'fine inks' for 50 gp for every levels of the spell he want to copy into his spellbook.



The problem is that there are no any 'fine inks' in the PHB goods list, just common 'inks'.



The question is: should a Wizard buy a lot of bottles of these common inks per 50 gp each? Or could he just use any inks (such as from the scholar pack) and drop 50 gp in the forest?



What should a Wizard sitting with common inks and a lot of gold in his bag the middle of the forest do to copy a spell from one spellbook to another? Is it possible?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Do you mean wizard? Sorcerers do not have spellbooks. (Might have a ritual book with a feat.)
    $endgroup$
    – Szega
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    Sure! Thank you, I fixed it. I am sorry, I am playing to a localized D&D version and that's why I could mix some terms.
    $endgroup$
    – Ohar
    1 hour ago


















4












$begingroup$


PHB says that Wizards should use 'fine inks' for 50 gp for every levels of the spell he want to copy into his spellbook.



The problem is that there are no any 'fine inks' in the PHB goods list, just common 'inks'.



The question is: should a Wizard buy a lot of bottles of these common inks per 50 gp each? Or could he just use any inks (such as from the scholar pack) and drop 50 gp in the forest?



What should a Wizard sitting with common inks and a lot of gold in his bag the middle of the forest do to copy a spell from one spellbook to another? Is it possible?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Do you mean wizard? Sorcerers do not have spellbooks. (Might have a ritual book with a feat.)
    $endgroup$
    – Szega
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    Sure! Thank you, I fixed it. I am sorry, I am playing to a localized D&D version and that's why I could mix some terms.
    $endgroup$
    – Ohar
    1 hour ago














4












4








4





$begingroup$


PHB says that Wizards should use 'fine inks' for 50 gp for every levels of the spell he want to copy into his spellbook.



The problem is that there are no any 'fine inks' in the PHB goods list, just common 'inks'.



The question is: should a Wizard buy a lot of bottles of these common inks per 50 gp each? Or could he just use any inks (such as from the scholar pack) and drop 50 gp in the forest?



What should a Wizard sitting with common inks and a lot of gold in his bag the middle of the forest do to copy a spell from one spellbook to another? Is it possible?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




PHB says that Wizards should use 'fine inks' for 50 gp for every levels of the spell he want to copy into his spellbook.



The problem is that there are no any 'fine inks' in the PHB goods list, just common 'inks'.



The question is: should a Wizard buy a lot of bottles of these common inks per 50 gp each? Or could he just use any inks (such as from the scholar pack) and drop 50 gp in the forest?



What should a Wizard sitting with common inks and a lot of gold in his bag the middle of the forest do to copy a spell from one spellbook to another? Is it possible?







dnd-5e spells wizard






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago









Someone_Evil

2,651626




2,651626










asked 1 hour ago









OharOhar

585




585







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Do you mean wizard? Sorcerers do not have spellbooks. (Might have a ritual book with a feat.)
    $endgroup$
    – Szega
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    Sure! Thank you, I fixed it. I am sorry, I am playing to a localized D&D version and that's why I could mix some terms.
    $endgroup$
    – Ohar
    1 hour ago













  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Do you mean wizard? Sorcerers do not have spellbooks. (Might have a ritual book with a feat.)
    $endgroup$
    – Szega
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    Sure! Thank you, I fixed it. I am sorry, I am playing to a localized D&D version and that's why I could mix some terms.
    $endgroup$
    – Ohar
    1 hour ago








3




3




$begingroup$
Do you mean wizard? Sorcerers do not have spellbooks. (Might have a ritual book with a feat.)
$endgroup$
– Szega
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
Do you mean wizard? Sorcerers do not have spellbooks. (Might have a ritual book with a feat.)
$endgroup$
– Szega
1 hour ago












$begingroup$
Sure! Thank you, I fixed it. I am sorry, I am playing to a localized D&D version and that's why I could mix some terms.
$endgroup$
– Ohar
1 hour ago





$begingroup$
Sure! Thank you, I fixed it. I am sorry, I am playing to a localized D&D version and that's why I could mix some terms.
$endgroup$
– Ohar
1 hour ago











4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















6












$begingroup$

This is an Abstraction your DM is expected to handle



"Fine Inks" is not a proper noun in 5th Edition D&D. You don't see a statblock for an item "Fine Inks" because it's just a colloquial term: "Inks that are of relatively high quality [hence why they cost 50gp, which eclipses the annual salary of a regular peasant by an order of magnitude]".



So if you manage to find a spell scroll or some other printed spell that you intend to copy into your spellbook, you need only say to your DM "I want to copy this spell into my spellbook", they'll say "alright, go to the market and buy the ink/components you need, do you have enough gold pieces?", and depending on what stage of the campaign you're in, the DM might try to throw in a plot hook during this process, or kidnap your Cleric, or some other normal D&D campaign things. Same as mostly anything else that happens when you're not physically navigating your way through a dungeon.



I could perhaps see some DMs get stingy on this process depending on where you're at (maybe the town you're in is especially roughshod and unlikely to have access to the quality of ink you need?) but other than that, there's really not much else to it.



Also, a reminder: the 50gp worth of materials is not solely the inks:




For each level of the spell, the process takes 2 hours and costs 50 gp. The cost represents material components you expend as you experiment with the spell to master it, as well as the fine inks you need to record it. Once you have spent this time and money, you can prepare the spell just like your other spells.



Spellbook, Player's handbook, pg. 114




So while there's definitely some amount of ink involved in copying the spell, the costs are also implied to be various other material components you might need to properly master the spell/verify its behavior. So in the same breath as above, your DM would probably ask you to visit a Reagent shop to pick up the various components you need.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    hence why they cost 50gp, which eclipses the annual salary of a regular peasant by an order of magnitude => This seems hard to reconcile with the fact that a "Modest Lifestyle", which given its definition seems to match that of regular peasant or regular worker, costs 1 gp/day; or do regular peasants and workers live in a "Poor Lifestyle" (without the comforts available in a stable community)?
    $endgroup$
    – Matthieu M.
    52 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    @MatthieuM. Probably due to the fact that it's a modest lifestyle for a traveler/adventurer. To compare it to our world, if would be like going on a trip, and having to eat at restaurants and pay for a hotel. You can certainly chose the cheaper options, but you're still paying more than if you bought a bag of rice and cooked it yourself.
    $endgroup$
    – Winterborne
    33 mins ago


















3












$begingroup$

The wizard just needs the gold pieces



The book states (emphasis mine)




For each level of the spell, the process takes 2 hours and costs 50 gp. The cost represents material components you expend as you experiment with the spell to master it, as well as the fine inks you need to record it. Once you have spent this time and money, you can prepare the spell just like your other spells.




A wizard doesn't actually need to have any components or inks on hand to copy a spell .... other than the spellbook(s); the gold is a standin.



As myself and other have said many times: D&D is a poor reality simulator and its better off not to view it under too fine a lens, lest the frayed (and fantastic) threads beneath be visible.




Personally, I've always imagined that the wizard somehow melts the gold into an ink itself, but that's purely my own interpretation.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    So wizards learn a procedure to transmute gold pieces into fine inks and reagents as necessary? Something that is not mentioned anywhere in any books?
    $endgroup$
    – Szega
    1 hour ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    To my knowledge, "the cost represents material components" means you still need these material components..
    $endgroup$
    – enkryptor
    1 hour ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Szega It's possible, but as goodguy5 said, "that's purely [goodguy5's] own interpretation." By a strict reading of the rule, all you have to do is spend two hours and the 50gp to represent the materials used, with no mention of when, where, or how those materials are obtained. This leaves the player and DM a lot of leeway in how those materials got there and whether the wizard just happened to already have the materials on hand instead of that 50 gp.
    $endgroup$
    – MrSpudtastic
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @MrSpudtastic So if the wizard has 50gp and wants to buy a potion of healing, then he has the coins, but if he wants to copy a spell, he retroactively already spent them? Quantum money? TBH this sounds ridiculous.
    $endgroup$
    – Szega
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    To be fair, rogues also don't have a rule that says "Spend 50 gp to acquire a dagger. The gold represents the materials that go into forging a dagger." Plus, wizards and other magic users often do just pay things to the aether, whether that be gold or anything else. That is literally what material components are for after all.
    $endgroup$
    – MrSpudtastic
    58 mins ago


















3












$begingroup$

It depends on how much detail and bookkeeping you want



The cost of copying spells is specified only in value and what they represent. The relevant excerpt from the Player's Handbook (p. 114):




For each level of the spell, the process takes 2 hours and
costs 50 gp. The cost represents material components you
expend as you experiment with the spell to master it, as well
as the fine inks you need to record it.




The simple solution is to say your gold is simply spent upon you copying the spell. One could say that the Wizard is assumed to have bought the relevant ingredients and inks when last they had opportunity. This in most cases gives the smoothest game-play as minimal time has to be dedicated to bookkeeping.



If your table prefers more realism (or accounting) you will need to buy it. At this point DM fiat will come in heavily, but saying you buy X gp worth of 'spell-learning-components and inks' that you can use as you find spells is not unreasonable.



If you want an awful lot of bookkeeping you could be required to track down all of the different stuff and possibly mix the ink yourself, however such an approach is gonna have your DM determining what exactly all of that stuff is and most of us aren't going to do that. If they suddenly do, it's probably being used as a plot hook...






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    -2












    $begingroup$

    You need to buy special inks



    The equipment list and table in the PHB are not exhaustive. If you cannot find something there, it does not mean that it does not exist or that it cannot be purchased.



    The fine inks in the wizard feature are a special item necessary for copying spells. You have to purchase them somewhere. If you do not have it (or the other necessary components) on hand, you cannot copy spells into your book.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      As the other answers explain, this just wouldn't make any sense. Why should an essential item for a class feature be missing from the equipment list?
      $endgroup$
      – Silverclaw
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Silverclaw There is no need for it to be there. No other class has any interest in it, and the price is presented in the feature description.
      $endgroup$
      – Szega
      1 hour ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      This interpretation, while it makes sense, is not strictly supported by the rules. A DM or player can freely interpret it this way, but the rules as they are written do not state that the wizard must explicitly purchase the relevant materials. I believe that if they were meant to do so, then the PHB would have listed the materials themselves and their associated costs, rather than abstracting it into "two hours and 50 gp."
      $endgroup$
      – MrSpudtastic
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      @MrSpudtastic How is "costs 50 gp. The cost represents material components" not an explicit rule stating the necessity to have those material components?
      $endgroup$
      – Szega
      1 hour ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      "The cost represents..." is a logically separate statement from the sentence before it. It describes what the gold represents, but does not explicitly say that you must go purchase the materials. One could just as easily say the wizard spends 50 gp as part of a ritual to literally conjure the materials out of thin air.
      $endgroup$
      – MrSpudtastic
      1 hour ago












    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "122"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145472%2fshould-a-wizard-buy-fine-inks-every-time-he-want-to-copy-spells-into-his-spellbo%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    6












    $begingroup$

    This is an Abstraction your DM is expected to handle



    "Fine Inks" is not a proper noun in 5th Edition D&D. You don't see a statblock for an item "Fine Inks" because it's just a colloquial term: "Inks that are of relatively high quality [hence why they cost 50gp, which eclipses the annual salary of a regular peasant by an order of magnitude]".



    So if you manage to find a spell scroll or some other printed spell that you intend to copy into your spellbook, you need only say to your DM "I want to copy this spell into my spellbook", they'll say "alright, go to the market and buy the ink/components you need, do you have enough gold pieces?", and depending on what stage of the campaign you're in, the DM might try to throw in a plot hook during this process, or kidnap your Cleric, or some other normal D&D campaign things. Same as mostly anything else that happens when you're not physically navigating your way through a dungeon.



    I could perhaps see some DMs get stingy on this process depending on where you're at (maybe the town you're in is especially roughshod and unlikely to have access to the quality of ink you need?) but other than that, there's really not much else to it.



    Also, a reminder: the 50gp worth of materials is not solely the inks:




    For each level of the spell, the process takes 2 hours and costs 50 gp. The cost represents material components you expend as you experiment with the spell to master it, as well as the fine inks you need to record it. Once you have spent this time and money, you can prepare the spell just like your other spells.



    Spellbook, Player's handbook, pg. 114




    So while there's definitely some amount of ink involved in copying the spell, the costs are also implied to be various other material components you might need to properly master the spell/verify its behavior. So in the same breath as above, your DM would probably ask you to visit a Reagent shop to pick up the various components you need.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      hence why they cost 50gp, which eclipses the annual salary of a regular peasant by an order of magnitude => This seems hard to reconcile with the fact that a "Modest Lifestyle", which given its definition seems to match that of regular peasant or regular worker, costs 1 gp/day; or do regular peasants and workers live in a "Poor Lifestyle" (without the comforts available in a stable community)?
      $endgroup$
      – Matthieu M.
      52 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      @MatthieuM. Probably due to the fact that it's a modest lifestyle for a traveler/adventurer. To compare it to our world, if would be like going on a trip, and having to eat at restaurants and pay for a hotel. You can certainly chose the cheaper options, but you're still paying more than if you bought a bag of rice and cooked it yourself.
      $endgroup$
      – Winterborne
      33 mins ago















    6












    $begingroup$

    This is an Abstraction your DM is expected to handle



    "Fine Inks" is not a proper noun in 5th Edition D&D. You don't see a statblock for an item "Fine Inks" because it's just a colloquial term: "Inks that are of relatively high quality [hence why they cost 50gp, which eclipses the annual salary of a regular peasant by an order of magnitude]".



    So if you manage to find a spell scroll or some other printed spell that you intend to copy into your spellbook, you need only say to your DM "I want to copy this spell into my spellbook", they'll say "alright, go to the market and buy the ink/components you need, do you have enough gold pieces?", and depending on what stage of the campaign you're in, the DM might try to throw in a plot hook during this process, or kidnap your Cleric, or some other normal D&D campaign things. Same as mostly anything else that happens when you're not physically navigating your way through a dungeon.



    I could perhaps see some DMs get stingy on this process depending on where you're at (maybe the town you're in is especially roughshod and unlikely to have access to the quality of ink you need?) but other than that, there's really not much else to it.



    Also, a reminder: the 50gp worth of materials is not solely the inks:




    For each level of the spell, the process takes 2 hours and costs 50 gp. The cost represents material components you expend as you experiment with the spell to master it, as well as the fine inks you need to record it. Once you have spent this time and money, you can prepare the spell just like your other spells.



    Spellbook, Player's handbook, pg. 114




    So while there's definitely some amount of ink involved in copying the spell, the costs are also implied to be various other material components you might need to properly master the spell/verify its behavior. So in the same breath as above, your DM would probably ask you to visit a Reagent shop to pick up the various components you need.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      hence why they cost 50gp, which eclipses the annual salary of a regular peasant by an order of magnitude => This seems hard to reconcile with the fact that a "Modest Lifestyle", which given its definition seems to match that of regular peasant or regular worker, costs 1 gp/day; or do regular peasants and workers live in a "Poor Lifestyle" (without the comforts available in a stable community)?
      $endgroup$
      – Matthieu M.
      52 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      @MatthieuM. Probably due to the fact that it's a modest lifestyle for a traveler/adventurer. To compare it to our world, if would be like going on a trip, and having to eat at restaurants and pay for a hotel. You can certainly chose the cheaper options, but you're still paying more than if you bought a bag of rice and cooked it yourself.
      $endgroup$
      – Winterborne
      33 mins ago













    6












    6








    6





    $begingroup$

    This is an Abstraction your DM is expected to handle



    "Fine Inks" is not a proper noun in 5th Edition D&D. You don't see a statblock for an item "Fine Inks" because it's just a colloquial term: "Inks that are of relatively high quality [hence why they cost 50gp, which eclipses the annual salary of a regular peasant by an order of magnitude]".



    So if you manage to find a spell scroll or some other printed spell that you intend to copy into your spellbook, you need only say to your DM "I want to copy this spell into my spellbook", they'll say "alright, go to the market and buy the ink/components you need, do you have enough gold pieces?", and depending on what stage of the campaign you're in, the DM might try to throw in a plot hook during this process, or kidnap your Cleric, or some other normal D&D campaign things. Same as mostly anything else that happens when you're not physically navigating your way through a dungeon.



    I could perhaps see some DMs get stingy on this process depending on where you're at (maybe the town you're in is especially roughshod and unlikely to have access to the quality of ink you need?) but other than that, there's really not much else to it.



    Also, a reminder: the 50gp worth of materials is not solely the inks:




    For each level of the spell, the process takes 2 hours and costs 50 gp. The cost represents material components you expend as you experiment with the spell to master it, as well as the fine inks you need to record it. Once you have spent this time and money, you can prepare the spell just like your other spells.



    Spellbook, Player's handbook, pg. 114




    So while there's definitely some amount of ink involved in copying the spell, the costs are also implied to be various other material components you might need to properly master the spell/verify its behavior. So in the same breath as above, your DM would probably ask you to visit a Reagent shop to pick up the various components you need.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    This is an Abstraction your DM is expected to handle



    "Fine Inks" is not a proper noun in 5th Edition D&D. You don't see a statblock for an item "Fine Inks" because it's just a colloquial term: "Inks that are of relatively high quality [hence why they cost 50gp, which eclipses the annual salary of a regular peasant by an order of magnitude]".



    So if you manage to find a spell scroll or some other printed spell that you intend to copy into your spellbook, you need only say to your DM "I want to copy this spell into my spellbook", they'll say "alright, go to the market and buy the ink/components you need, do you have enough gold pieces?", and depending on what stage of the campaign you're in, the DM might try to throw in a plot hook during this process, or kidnap your Cleric, or some other normal D&D campaign things. Same as mostly anything else that happens when you're not physically navigating your way through a dungeon.



    I could perhaps see some DMs get stingy on this process depending on where you're at (maybe the town you're in is especially roughshod and unlikely to have access to the quality of ink you need?) but other than that, there's really not much else to it.



    Also, a reminder: the 50gp worth of materials is not solely the inks:




    For each level of the spell, the process takes 2 hours and costs 50 gp. The cost represents material components you expend as you experiment with the spell to master it, as well as the fine inks you need to record it. Once you have spent this time and money, you can prepare the spell just like your other spells.



    Spellbook, Player's handbook, pg. 114




    So while there's definitely some amount of ink involved in copying the spell, the costs are also implied to be various other material components you might need to properly master the spell/verify its behavior. So in the same breath as above, your DM would probably ask you to visit a Reagent shop to pick up the various components you need.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 1 hour ago

























    answered 1 hour ago









    XiremaXirema

    24.5k269144




    24.5k269144











    • $begingroup$
      hence why they cost 50gp, which eclipses the annual salary of a regular peasant by an order of magnitude => This seems hard to reconcile with the fact that a "Modest Lifestyle", which given its definition seems to match that of regular peasant or regular worker, costs 1 gp/day; or do regular peasants and workers live in a "Poor Lifestyle" (without the comforts available in a stable community)?
      $endgroup$
      – Matthieu M.
      52 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      @MatthieuM. Probably due to the fact that it's a modest lifestyle for a traveler/adventurer. To compare it to our world, if would be like going on a trip, and having to eat at restaurants and pay for a hotel. You can certainly chose the cheaper options, but you're still paying more than if you bought a bag of rice and cooked it yourself.
      $endgroup$
      – Winterborne
      33 mins ago
















    • $begingroup$
      hence why they cost 50gp, which eclipses the annual salary of a regular peasant by an order of magnitude => This seems hard to reconcile with the fact that a "Modest Lifestyle", which given its definition seems to match that of regular peasant or regular worker, costs 1 gp/day; or do regular peasants and workers live in a "Poor Lifestyle" (without the comforts available in a stable community)?
      $endgroup$
      – Matthieu M.
      52 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      @MatthieuM. Probably due to the fact that it's a modest lifestyle for a traveler/adventurer. To compare it to our world, if would be like going on a trip, and having to eat at restaurants and pay for a hotel. You can certainly chose the cheaper options, but you're still paying more than if you bought a bag of rice and cooked it yourself.
      $endgroup$
      – Winterborne
      33 mins ago















    $begingroup$
    hence why they cost 50gp, which eclipses the annual salary of a regular peasant by an order of magnitude => This seems hard to reconcile with the fact that a "Modest Lifestyle", which given its definition seems to match that of regular peasant or regular worker, costs 1 gp/day; or do regular peasants and workers live in a "Poor Lifestyle" (without the comforts available in a stable community)?
    $endgroup$
    – Matthieu M.
    52 mins ago




    $begingroup$
    hence why they cost 50gp, which eclipses the annual salary of a regular peasant by an order of magnitude => This seems hard to reconcile with the fact that a "Modest Lifestyle", which given its definition seems to match that of regular peasant or regular worker, costs 1 gp/day; or do regular peasants and workers live in a "Poor Lifestyle" (without the comforts available in a stable community)?
    $endgroup$
    – Matthieu M.
    52 mins ago












    $begingroup$
    @MatthieuM. Probably due to the fact that it's a modest lifestyle for a traveler/adventurer. To compare it to our world, if would be like going on a trip, and having to eat at restaurants and pay for a hotel. You can certainly chose the cheaper options, but you're still paying more than if you bought a bag of rice and cooked it yourself.
    $endgroup$
    – Winterborne
    33 mins ago




    $begingroup$
    @MatthieuM. Probably due to the fact that it's a modest lifestyle for a traveler/adventurer. To compare it to our world, if would be like going on a trip, and having to eat at restaurants and pay for a hotel. You can certainly chose the cheaper options, but you're still paying more than if you bought a bag of rice and cooked it yourself.
    $endgroup$
    – Winterborne
    33 mins ago













    3












    $begingroup$

    The wizard just needs the gold pieces



    The book states (emphasis mine)




    For each level of the spell, the process takes 2 hours and costs 50 gp. The cost represents material components you expend as you experiment with the spell to master it, as well as the fine inks you need to record it. Once you have spent this time and money, you can prepare the spell just like your other spells.




    A wizard doesn't actually need to have any components or inks on hand to copy a spell .... other than the spellbook(s); the gold is a standin.



    As myself and other have said many times: D&D is a poor reality simulator and its better off not to view it under too fine a lens, lest the frayed (and fantastic) threads beneath be visible.




    Personally, I've always imagined that the wizard somehow melts the gold into an ink itself, but that's purely my own interpretation.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      So wizards learn a procedure to transmute gold pieces into fine inks and reagents as necessary? Something that is not mentioned anywhere in any books?
      $endgroup$
      – Szega
      1 hour ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      To my knowledge, "the cost represents material components" means you still need these material components..
      $endgroup$
      – enkryptor
      1 hour ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @Szega It's possible, but as goodguy5 said, "that's purely [goodguy5's] own interpretation." By a strict reading of the rule, all you have to do is spend two hours and the 50gp to represent the materials used, with no mention of when, where, or how those materials are obtained. This leaves the player and DM a lot of leeway in how those materials got there and whether the wizard just happened to already have the materials on hand instead of that 50 gp.
      $endgroup$
      – MrSpudtastic
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      @MrSpudtastic So if the wizard has 50gp and wants to buy a potion of healing, then he has the coins, but if he wants to copy a spell, he retroactively already spent them? Quantum money? TBH this sounds ridiculous.
      $endgroup$
      – Szega
      1 hour ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      To be fair, rogues also don't have a rule that says "Spend 50 gp to acquire a dagger. The gold represents the materials that go into forging a dagger." Plus, wizards and other magic users often do just pay things to the aether, whether that be gold or anything else. That is literally what material components are for after all.
      $endgroup$
      – MrSpudtastic
      58 mins ago















    3












    $begingroup$

    The wizard just needs the gold pieces



    The book states (emphasis mine)




    For each level of the spell, the process takes 2 hours and costs 50 gp. The cost represents material components you expend as you experiment with the spell to master it, as well as the fine inks you need to record it. Once you have spent this time and money, you can prepare the spell just like your other spells.




    A wizard doesn't actually need to have any components or inks on hand to copy a spell .... other than the spellbook(s); the gold is a standin.



    As myself and other have said many times: D&D is a poor reality simulator and its better off not to view it under too fine a lens, lest the frayed (and fantastic) threads beneath be visible.




    Personally, I've always imagined that the wizard somehow melts the gold into an ink itself, but that's purely my own interpretation.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      So wizards learn a procedure to transmute gold pieces into fine inks and reagents as necessary? Something that is not mentioned anywhere in any books?
      $endgroup$
      – Szega
      1 hour ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      To my knowledge, "the cost represents material components" means you still need these material components..
      $endgroup$
      – enkryptor
      1 hour ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @Szega It's possible, but as goodguy5 said, "that's purely [goodguy5's] own interpretation." By a strict reading of the rule, all you have to do is spend two hours and the 50gp to represent the materials used, with no mention of when, where, or how those materials are obtained. This leaves the player and DM a lot of leeway in how those materials got there and whether the wizard just happened to already have the materials on hand instead of that 50 gp.
      $endgroup$
      – MrSpudtastic
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      @MrSpudtastic So if the wizard has 50gp and wants to buy a potion of healing, then he has the coins, but if he wants to copy a spell, he retroactively already spent them? Quantum money? TBH this sounds ridiculous.
      $endgroup$
      – Szega
      1 hour ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      To be fair, rogues also don't have a rule that says "Spend 50 gp to acquire a dagger. The gold represents the materials that go into forging a dagger." Plus, wizards and other magic users often do just pay things to the aether, whether that be gold or anything else. That is literally what material components are for after all.
      $endgroup$
      – MrSpudtastic
      58 mins ago













    3












    3








    3





    $begingroup$

    The wizard just needs the gold pieces



    The book states (emphasis mine)




    For each level of the spell, the process takes 2 hours and costs 50 gp. The cost represents material components you expend as you experiment with the spell to master it, as well as the fine inks you need to record it. Once you have spent this time and money, you can prepare the spell just like your other spells.




    A wizard doesn't actually need to have any components or inks on hand to copy a spell .... other than the spellbook(s); the gold is a standin.



    As myself and other have said many times: D&D is a poor reality simulator and its better off not to view it under too fine a lens, lest the frayed (and fantastic) threads beneath be visible.




    Personally, I've always imagined that the wizard somehow melts the gold into an ink itself, but that's purely my own interpretation.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    The wizard just needs the gold pieces



    The book states (emphasis mine)




    For each level of the spell, the process takes 2 hours and costs 50 gp. The cost represents material components you expend as you experiment with the spell to master it, as well as the fine inks you need to record it. Once you have spent this time and money, you can prepare the spell just like your other spells.




    A wizard doesn't actually need to have any components or inks on hand to copy a spell .... other than the spellbook(s); the gold is a standin.



    As myself and other have said many times: D&D is a poor reality simulator and its better off not to view it under too fine a lens, lest the frayed (and fantastic) threads beneath be visible.




    Personally, I've always imagined that the wizard somehow melts the gold into an ink itself, but that's purely my own interpretation.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 1 hour ago

























    answered 1 hour ago









    goodguy5goodguy5

    10.3k23879




    10.3k23879







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      So wizards learn a procedure to transmute gold pieces into fine inks and reagents as necessary? Something that is not mentioned anywhere in any books?
      $endgroup$
      – Szega
      1 hour ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      To my knowledge, "the cost represents material components" means you still need these material components..
      $endgroup$
      – enkryptor
      1 hour ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @Szega It's possible, but as goodguy5 said, "that's purely [goodguy5's] own interpretation." By a strict reading of the rule, all you have to do is spend two hours and the 50gp to represent the materials used, with no mention of when, where, or how those materials are obtained. This leaves the player and DM a lot of leeway in how those materials got there and whether the wizard just happened to already have the materials on hand instead of that 50 gp.
      $endgroup$
      – MrSpudtastic
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      @MrSpudtastic So if the wizard has 50gp and wants to buy a potion of healing, then he has the coins, but if he wants to copy a spell, he retroactively already spent them? Quantum money? TBH this sounds ridiculous.
      $endgroup$
      – Szega
      1 hour ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      To be fair, rogues also don't have a rule that says "Spend 50 gp to acquire a dagger. The gold represents the materials that go into forging a dagger." Plus, wizards and other magic users often do just pay things to the aether, whether that be gold or anything else. That is literally what material components are for after all.
      $endgroup$
      – MrSpudtastic
      58 mins ago












    • 1




      $begingroup$
      So wizards learn a procedure to transmute gold pieces into fine inks and reagents as necessary? Something that is not mentioned anywhere in any books?
      $endgroup$
      – Szega
      1 hour ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      To my knowledge, "the cost represents material components" means you still need these material components..
      $endgroup$
      – enkryptor
      1 hour ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @Szega It's possible, but as goodguy5 said, "that's purely [goodguy5's] own interpretation." By a strict reading of the rule, all you have to do is spend two hours and the 50gp to represent the materials used, with no mention of when, where, or how those materials are obtained. This leaves the player and DM a lot of leeway in how those materials got there and whether the wizard just happened to already have the materials on hand instead of that 50 gp.
      $endgroup$
      – MrSpudtastic
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      @MrSpudtastic So if the wizard has 50gp and wants to buy a potion of healing, then he has the coins, but if he wants to copy a spell, he retroactively already spent them? Quantum money? TBH this sounds ridiculous.
      $endgroup$
      – Szega
      1 hour ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      To be fair, rogues also don't have a rule that says "Spend 50 gp to acquire a dagger. The gold represents the materials that go into forging a dagger." Plus, wizards and other magic users often do just pay things to the aether, whether that be gold or anything else. That is literally what material components are for after all.
      $endgroup$
      – MrSpudtastic
      58 mins ago







    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    So wizards learn a procedure to transmute gold pieces into fine inks and reagents as necessary? Something that is not mentioned anywhere in any books?
    $endgroup$
    – Szega
    1 hour ago




    $begingroup$
    So wizards learn a procedure to transmute gold pieces into fine inks and reagents as necessary? Something that is not mentioned anywhere in any books?
    $endgroup$
    – Szega
    1 hour ago




    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    To my knowledge, "the cost represents material components" means you still need these material components..
    $endgroup$
    – enkryptor
    1 hour ago




    $begingroup$
    To my knowledge, "the cost represents material components" means you still need these material components..
    $endgroup$
    – enkryptor
    1 hour ago




    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    @Szega It's possible, but as goodguy5 said, "that's purely [goodguy5's] own interpretation." By a strict reading of the rule, all you have to do is spend two hours and the 50gp to represent the materials used, with no mention of when, where, or how those materials are obtained. This leaves the player and DM a lot of leeway in how those materials got there and whether the wizard just happened to already have the materials on hand instead of that 50 gp.
    $endgroup$
    – MrSpudtastic
    1 hour ago




    $begingroup$
    @Szega It's possible, but as goodguy5 said, "that's purely [goodguy5's] own interpretation." By a strict reading of the rule, all you have to do is spend two hours and the 50gp to represent the materials used, with no mention of when, where, or how those materials are obtained. This leaves the player and DM a lot of leeway in how those materials got there and whether the wizard just happened to already have the materials on hand instead of that 50 gp.
    $endgroup$
    – MrSpudtastic
    1 hour ago












    $begingroup$
    @MrSpudtastic So if the wizard has 50gp and wants to buy a potion of healing, then he has the coins, but if he wants to copy a spell, he retroactively already spent them? Quantum money? TBH this sounds ridiculous.
    $endgroup$
    – Szega
    1 hour ago




    $begingroup$
    @MrSpudtastic So if the wizard has 50gp and wants to buy a potion of healing, then he has the coins, but if he wants to copy a spell, he retroactively already spent them? Quantum money? TBH this sounds ridiculous.
    $endgroup$
    – Szega
    1 hour ago




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    To be fair, rogues also don't have a rule that says "Spend 50 gp to acquire a dagger. The gold represents the materials that go into forging a dagger." Plus, wizards and other magic users often do just pay things to the aether, whether that be gold or anything else. That is literally what material components are for after all.
    $endgroup$
    – MrSpudtastic
    58 mins ago




    $begingroup$
    To be fair, rogues also don't have a rule that says "Spend 50 gp to acquire a dagger. The gold represents the materials that go into forging a dagger." Plus, wizards and other magic users often do just pay things to the aether, whether that be gold or anything else. That is literally what material components are for after all.
    $endgroup$
    – MrSpudtastic
    58 mins ago











    3












    $begingroup$

    It depends on how much detail and bookkeeping you want



    The cost of copying spells is specified only in value and what they represent. The relevant excerpt from the Player's Handbook (p. 114):




    For each level of the spell, the process takes 2 hours and
    costs 50 gp. The cost represents material components you
    expend as you experiment with the spell to master it, as well
    as the fine inks you need to record it.




    The simple solution is to say your gold is simply spent upon you copying the spell. One could say that the Wizard is assumed to have bought the relevant ingredients and inks when last they had opportunity. This in most cases gives the smoothest game-play as minimal time has to be dedicated to bookkeeping.



    If your table prefers more realism (or accounting) you will need to buy it. At this point DM fiat will come in heavily, but saying you buy X gp worth of 'spell-learning-components and inks' that you can use as you find spells is not unreasonable.



    If you want an awful lot of bookkeeping you could be required to track down all of the different stuff and possibly mix the ink yourself, however such an approach is gonna have your DM determining what exactly all of that stuff is and most of us aren't going to do that. If they suddenly do, it's probably being used as a plot hook...






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      3












      $begingroup$

      It depends on how much detail and bookkeeping you want



      The cost of copying spells is specified only in value and what they represent. The relevant excerpt from the Player's Handbook (p. 114):




      For each level of the spell, the process takes 2 hours and
      costs 50 gp. The cost represents material components you
      expend as you experiment with the spell to master it, as well
      as the fine inks you need to record it.




      The simple solution is to say your gold is simply spent upon you copying the spell. One could say that the Wizard is assumed to have bought the relevant ingredients and inks when last they had opportunity. This in most cases gives the smoothest game-play as minimal time has to be dedicated to bookkeeping.



      If your table prefers more realism (or accounting) you will need to buy it. At this point DM fiat will come in heavily, but saying you buy X gp worth of 'spell-learning-components and inks' that you can use as you find spells is not unreasonable.



      If you want an awful lot of bookkeeping you could be required to track down all of the different stuff and possibly mix the ink yourself, however such an approach is gonna have your DM determining what exactly all of that stuff is and most of us aren't going to do that. If they suddenly do, it's probably being used as a plot hook...






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















        3












        3








        3





        $begingroup$

        It depends on how much detail and bookkeeping you want



        The cost of copying spells is specified only in value and what they represent. The relevant excerpt from the Player's Handbook (p. 114):




        For each level of the spell, the process takes 2 hours and
        costs 50 gp. The cost represents material components you
        expend as you experiment with the spell to master it, as well
        as the fine inks you need to record it.




        The simple solution is to say your gold is simply spent upon you copying the spell. One could say that the Wizard is assumed to have bought the relevant ingredients and inks when last they had opportunity. This in most cases gives the smoothest game-play as minimal time has to be dedicated to bookkeeping.



        If your table prefers more realism (or accounting) you will need to buy it. At this point DM fiat will come in heavily, but saying you buy X gp worth of 'spell-learning-components and inks' that you can use as you find spells is not unreasonable.



        If you want an awful lot of bookkeeping you could be required to track down all of the different stuff and possibly mix the ink yourself, however such an approach is gonna have your DM determining what exactly all of that stuff is and most of us aren't going to do that. If they suddenly do, it's probably being used as a plot hook...






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        It depends on how much detail and bookkeeping you want



        The cost of copying spells is specified only in value and what they represent. The relevant excerpt from the Player's Handbook (p. 114):




        For each level of the spell, the process takes 2 hours and
        costs 50 gp. The cost represents material components you
        expend as you experiment with the spell to master it, as well
        as the fine inks you need to record it.




        The simple solution is to say your gold is simply spent upon you copying the spell. One could say that the Wizard is assumed to have bought the relevant ingredients and inks when last they had opportunity. This in most cases gives the smoothest game-play as minimal time has to be dedicated to bookkeeping.



        If your table prefers more realism (or accounting) you will need to buy it. At this point DM fiat will come in heavily, but saying you buy X gp worth of 'spell-learning-components and inks' that you can use as you find spells is not unreasonable.



        If you want an awful lot of bookkeeping you could be required to track down all of the different stuff and possibly mix the ink yourself, however such an approach is gonna have your DM determining what exactly all of that stuff is and most of us aren't going to do that. If they suddenly do, it's probably being used as a plot hook...







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 51 mins ago

























        answered 1 hour ago









        Someone_EvilSomeone_Evil

        2,651626




        2,651626





















            -2












            $begingroup$

            You need to buy special inks



            The equipment list and table in the PHB are not exhaustive. If you cannot find something there, it does not mean that it does not exist or that it cannot be purchased.



            The fine inks in the wizard feature are a special item necessary for copying spells. You have to purchase them somewhere. If you do not have it (or the other necessary components) on hand, you cannot copy spells into your book.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              As the other answers explain, this just wouldn't make any sense. Why should an essential item for a class feature be missing from the equipment list?
              $endgroup$
              – Silverclaw
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              @Silverclaw There is no need for it to be there. No other class has any interest in it, and the price is presented in the feature description.
              $endgroup$
              – Szega
              1 hour ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              This interpretation, while it makes sense, is not strictly supported by the rules. A DM or player can freely interpret it this way, but the rules as they are written do not state that the wizard must explicitly purchase the relevant materials. I believe that if they were meant to do so, then the PHB would have listed the materials themselves and their associated costs, rather than abstracting it into "two hours and 50 gp."
              $endgroup$
              – MrSpudtastic
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              @MrSpudtastic How is "costs 50 gp. The cost represents material components" not an explicit rule stating the necessity to have those material components?
              $endgroup$
              – Szega
              1 hour ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              "The cost represents..." is a logically separate statement from the sentence before it. It describes what the gold represents, but does not explicitly say that you must go purchase the materials. One could just as easily say the wizard spends 50 gp as part of a ritual to literally conjure the materials out of thin air.
              $endgroup$
              – MrSpudtastic
              1 hour ago
















            -2












            $begingroup$

            You need to buy special inks



            The equipment list and table in the PHB are not exhaustive. If you cannot find something there, it does not mean that it does not exist or that it cannot be purchased.



            The fine inks in the wizard feature are a special item necessary for copying spells. You have to purchase them somewhere. If you do not have it (or the other necessary components) on hand, you cannot copy spells into your book.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              As the other answers explain, this just wouldn't make any sense. Why should an essential item for a class feature be missing from the equipment list?
              $endgroup$
              – Silverclaw
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              @Silverclaw There is no need for it to be there. No other class has any interest in it, and the price is presented in the feature description.
              $endgroup$
              – Szega
              1 hour ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              This interpretation, while it makes sense, is not strictly supported by the rules. A DM or player can freely interpret it this way, but the rules as they are written do not state that the wizard must explicitly purchase the relevant materials. I believe that if they were meant to do so, then the PHB would have listed the materials themselves and their associated costs, rather than abstracting it into "two hours and 50 gp."
              $endgroup$
              – MrSpudtastic
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              @MrSpudtastic How is "costs 50 gp. The cost represents material components" not an explicit rule stating the necessity to have those material components?
              $endgroup$
              – Szega
              1 hour ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              "The cost represents..." is a logically separate statement from the sentence before it. It describes what the gold represents, but does not explicitly say that you must go purchase the materials. One could just as easily say the wizard spends 50 gp as part of a ritual to literally conjure the materials out of thin air.
              $endgroup$
              – MrSpudtastic
              1 hour ago














            -2












            -2








            -2





            $begingroup$

            You need to buy special inks



            The equipment list and table in the PHB are not exhaustive. If you cannot find something there, it does not mean that it does not exist or that it cannot be purchased.



            The fine inks in the wizard feature are a special item necessary for copying spells. You have to purchase them somewhere. If you do not have it (or the other necessary components) on hand, you cannot copy spells into your book.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            You need to buy special inks



            The equipment list and table in the PHB are not exhaustive. If you cannot find something there, it does not mean that it does not exist or that it cannot be purchased.



            The fine inks in the wizard feature are a special item necessary for copying spells. You have to purchase them somewhere. If you do not have it (or the other necessary components) on hand, you cannot copy spells into your book.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 1 hour ago









            SzegaSzega

            40.2k4165200




            40.2k4165200











            • $begingroup$
              As the other answers explain, this just wouldn't make any sense. Why should an essential item for a class feature be missing from the equipment list?
              $endgroup$
              – Silverclaw
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              @Silverclaw There is no need for it to be there. No other class has any interest in it, and the price is presented in the feature description.
              $endgroup$
              – Szega
              1 hour ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              This interpretation, while it makes sense, is not strictly supported by the rules. A DM or player can freely interpret it this way, but the rules as they are written do not state that the wizard must explicitly purchase the relevant materials. I believe that if they were meant to do so, then the PHB would have listed the materials themselves and their associated costs, rather than abstracting it into "two hours and 50 gp."
              $endgroup$
              – MrSpudtastic
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              @MrSpudtastic How is "costs 50 gp. The cost represents material components" not an explicit rule stating the necessity to have those material components?
              $endgroup$
              – Szega
              1 hour ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              "The cost represents..." is a logically separate statement from the sentence before it. It describes what the gold represents, but does not explicitly say that you must go purchase the materials. One could just as easily say the wizard spends 50 gp as part of a ritual to literally conjure the materials out of thin air.
              $endgroup$
              – MrSpudtastic
              1 hour ago

















            • $begingroup$
              As the other answers explain, this just wouldn't make any sense. Why should an essential item for a class feature be missing from the equipment list?
              $endgroup$
              – Silverclaw
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              @Silverclaw There is no need for it to be there. No other class has any interest in it, and the price is presented in the feature description.
              $endgroup$
              – Szega
              1 hour ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              This interpretation, while it makes sense, is not strictly supported by the rules. A DM or player can freely interpret it this way, but the rules as they are written do not state that the wizard must explicitly purchase the relevant materials. I believe that if they were meant to do so, then the PHB would have listed the materials themselves and their associated costs, rather than abstracting it into "two hours and 50 gp."
              $endgroup$
              – MrSpudtastic
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              @MrSpudtastic How is "costs 50 gp. The cost represents material components" not an explicit rule stating the necessity to have those material components?
              $endgroup$
              – Szega
              1 hour ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              "The cost represents..." is a logically separate statement from the sentence before it. It describes what the gold represents, but does not explicitly say that you must go purchase the materials. One could just as easily say the wizard spends 50 gp as part of a ritual to literally conjure the materials out of thin air.
              $endgroup$
              – MrSpudtastic
              1 hour ago
















            $begingroup$
            As the other answers explain, this just wouldn't make any sense. Why should an essential item for a class feature be missing from the equipment list?
            $endgroup$
            – Silverclaw
            1 hour ago




            $begingroup$
            As the other answers explain, this just wouldn't make any sense. Why should an essential item for a class feature be missing from the equipment list?
            $endgroup$
            – Silverclaw
            1 hour ago












            $begingroup$
            @Silverclaw There is no need for it to be there. No other class has any interest in it, and the price is presented in the feature description.
            $endgroup$
            – Szega
            1 hour ago




            $begingroup$
            @Silverclaw There is no need for it to be there. No other class has any interest in it, and the price is presented in the feature description.
            $endgroup$
            – Szega
            1 hour ago




            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            This interpretation, while it makes sense, is not strictly supported by the rules. A DM or player can freely interpret it this way, but the rules as they are written do not state that the wizard must explicitly purchase the relevant materials. I believe that if they were meant to do so, then the PHB would have listed the materials themselves and their associated costs, rather than abstracting it into "two hours and 50 gp."
            $endgroup$
            – MrSpudtastic
            1 hour ago




            $begingroup$
            This interpretation, while it makes sense, is not strictly supported by the rules. A DM or player can freely interpret it this way, but the rules as they are written do not state that the wizard must explicitly purchase the relevant materials. I believe that if they were meant to do so, then the PHB would have listed the materials themselves and their associated costs, rather than abstracting it into "two hours and 50 gp."
            $endgroup$
            – MrSpudtastic
            1 hour ago












            $begingroup$
            @MrSpudtastic How is "costs 50 gp. The cost represents material components" not an explicit rule stating the necessity to have those material components?
            $endgroup$
            – Szega
            1 hour ago




            $begingroup$
            @MrSpudtastic How is "costs 50 gp. The cost represents material components" not an explicit rule stating the necessity to have those material components?
            $endgroup$
            – Szega
            1 hour ago




            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            "The cost represents..." is a logically separate statement from the sentence before it. It describes what the gold represents, but does not explicitly say that you must go purchase the materials. One could just as easily say the wizard spends 50 gp as part of a ritual to literally conjure the materials out of thin air.
            $endgroup$
            – MrSpudtastic
            1 hour ago





            $begingroup$
            "The cost represents..." is a logically separate statement from the sentence before it. It describes what the gold represents, but does not explicitly say that you must go purchase the materials. One could just as easily say the wizard spends 50 gp as part of a ritual to literally conjure the materials out of thin air.
            $endgroup$
            – MrSpudtastic
            1 hour ago


















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145472%2fshould-a-wizard-buy-fine-inks-every-time-he-want-to-copy-spells-into-his-spellbo%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Category:Fedor von Bock Media in category "Fedor von Bock"Navigation menuUpload mediaISNI: 0000 0000 5511 3417VIAF ID: 24712551GND ID: 119294796Library of Congress authority ID: n96068363BnF ID: 12534305fSUDOC authorities ID: 034604189Open Library ID: OL338253ANKCR AUT ID: jn19990000869National Library of Israel ID: 000514068National Thesaurus for Author Names ID: 341574317ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

            Reverse int within the 32-bit signed integer range: [−2^31, 2^31 − 1]Combining two 32-bit integers into one 64-bit integerDetermine if an int is within rangeLossy packing 32 bit integer to 16 bitComputing the square root of a 64-bit integerKeeping integer addition within boundsSafe multiplication of two 64-bit signed integersLeetcode 10: Regular Expression MatchingSigned integer-to-ascii x86_64 assembler macroReverse the digits of an Integer“Add two numbers given in reverse order from a linked list”

            Kiel Indholdsfortegnelse Historie | Transport og færgeforbindelser | Sejlsport og anden sport | Kultur | Kendte personer fra Kiel | Noter | Litteratur | Eksterne henvisninger | Navigationsmenuwww.kiel.de54°19′31″N 10°8′26″Ø / 54.32528°N 10.14056°Ø / 54.32528; 10.14056Oberbürgermeister Dr. Ulf Kämpferwww.statistik-nord.deDen danske Stats StatistikKiels hjemmesiderrrWorldCat312794080n790547494030481-4