How can I best take pictures of a moving speaker in a dark room with accent lights? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Proposal: Rules for *New* Photo Contest on Main SiteHow can I take pictures of far-away mountains to the South?How to take fast-shutter-speed photos that aren't dark?How to take pictures in a dark room?How can I take long exposure photos with a webcam?Can a consumer-grade camera take good aurora pictures?Can I use auto exposure with studio lights?How to shoot bright purple lights against an overall dark scene?How can I take a photo of a dark bar with a bright sign?How can I shoot in a semi-dark room without very long shutter speeds?How to take a dark photo of a dark room?

Why is there Net Work Done on a Pressure/Volume Cycle?

Why do early math courses focus on the cross sections of a cone and not on other 3D objects?

How do I tell what width chain my used chainring needs?

What is the difference between globalisation and imperialism?

Trademark violation for app?

Putting class ranking in CV, but against dept guidelines

Maximum summed subsequences with non-adjacent items

C's equality operator on converted pointers

Is it fair for a professor to grade us on the possession of past papers?

Is it possible to give , in economics, an example of a relation ( set of ordered pairs) that is not a function?

Is it possible for SQL statements to execute concurrently within a single session in SQL Server?

Why does it sometimes sound good to play a grace note as a lead in to a note in a melody?

How were pictures turned from film to a big picture in a picture frame before digital scanning?

Is there public access to the Meteor Crater in Arizona?

Should a wizard buy fine inks every time he want to copy spells into his spellbook?

What is an "asse" in Elizabethan English?

Why are vacuum tubes still used in amateur radios?

What is the home of the drow in Flanaess?

Would it be possible to dictate a bech32 address as a list of English words?

How do living politicians protect their readily obtainable signatures from misuse?

If Windows 7 doesn't support WSL, then what is "Subsystem for UNIX-based Applications"?

What are the discoveries that have been possible with the rejection of positivism?

How often does castling occur in grandmaster games?

Why weren't discrete x86 CPUs ever used in game hardware?



How can I best take pictures of a moving speaker in a dark room with accent lights?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
Proposal: Rules for *New* Photo Contest on Main SiteHow can I take pictures of far-away mountains to the South?How to take fast-shutter-speed photos that aren't dark?How to take pictures in a dark room?How can I take long exposure photos with a webcam?Can a consumer-grade camera take good aurora pictures?Can I use auto exposure with studio lights?How to shoot bright purple lights against an overall dark scene?How can I take a photo of a dark bar with a bright sign?How can I shoot in a semi-dark room without very long shutter speeds?How to take a dark photo of a dark room?



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








1















I’m taking pictures this Sunday at my church of the youth pastor preaching and in the youth room is a semi-lit type of room with a lot of accent colour lights. He’s going to be moving and I want to get shots to freeze the action so I know I need a high shutter speed but this is where I’m stuck:



I’ll be standing about 10-15 feet from the stage so I’m not sure what aperture to use and I want to have that nice bokeh background but I want to make sure he’s totally in focus(I have a 50mm prime 1.8 lens) and I’m not sure what ISO to use to avoid a lot of noise. I have Lightroom to bump up any pictures



I’m looking for past experiences and what you guys did to overcome some issues you ran into.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Nate is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 1





    How dark is 'semi-lit'? Will you have any chance to get in there beforehand & check the camera will even focus in that light?

    – Tetsujin
    5 hours ago











  • I will yes. By semi lit I meant main lights are off and the mood lights are filling in the dark, kind of hard to explain

    – Nate
    5 hours ago

















1















I’m taking pictures this Sunday at my church of the youth pastor preaching and in the youth room is a semi-lit type of room with a lot of accent colour lights. He’s going to be moving and I want to get shots to freeze the action so I know I need a high shutter speed but this is where I’m stuck:



I’ll be standing about 10-15 feet from the stage so I’m not sure what aperture to use and I want to have that nice bokeh background but I want to make sure he’s totally in focus(I have a 50mm prime 1.8 lens) and I’m not sure what ISO to use to avoid a lot of noise. I have Lightroom to bump up any pictures



I’m looking for past experiences and what you guys did to overcome some issues you ran into.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Nate is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 1





    How dark is 'semi-lit'? Will you have any chance to get in there beforehand & check the camera will even focus in that light?

    – Tetsujin
    5 hours ago











  • I will yes. By semi lit I meant main lights are off and the mood lights are filling in the dark, kind of hard to explain

    – Nate
    5 hours ago













1












1








1








I’m taking pictures this Sunday at my church of the youth pastor preaching and in the youth room is a semi-lit type of room with a lot of accent colour lights. He’s going to be moving and I want to get shots to freeze the action so I know I need a high shutter speed but this is where I’m stuck:



I’ll be standing about 10-15 feet from the stage so I’m not sure what aperture to use and I want to have that nice bokeh background but I want to make sure he’s totally in focus(I have a 50mm prime 1.8 lens) and I’m not sure what ISO to use to avoid a lot of noise. I have Lightroom to bump up any pictures



I’m looking for past experiences and what you guys did to overcome some issues you ran into.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Nate is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












I’m taking pictures this Sunday at my church of the youth pastor preaching and in the youth room is a semi-lit type of room with a lot of accent colour lights. He’s going to be moving and I want to get shots to freeze the action so I know I need a high shutter speed but this is where I’m stuck:



I’ll be standing about 10-15 feet from the stage so I’m not sure what aperture to use and I want to have that nice bokeh background but I want to make sure he’s totally in focus(I have a 50mm prime 1.8 lens) and I’m not sure what ISO to use to avoid a lot of noise. I have Lightroom to bump up any pictures



I’m looking for past experiences and what you guys did to overcome some issues you ran into.







exposure






share|improve this question









New contributor




Nate is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Nate is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 4 hours ago









mattdm

123k40359656




123k40359656






New contributor




Nate is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 5 hours ago









NateNate

62




62




New contributor




Nate is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Nate is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Nate is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 1





    How dark is 'semi-lit'? Will you have any chance to get in there beforehand & check the camera will even focus in that light?

    – Tetsujin
    5 hours ago











  • I will yes. By semi lit I meant main lights are off and the mood lights are filling in the dark, kind of hard to explain

    – Nate
    5 hours ago












  • 1





    How dark is 'semi-lit'? Will you have any chance to get in there beforehand & check the camera will even focus in that light?

    – Tetsujin
    5 hours ago











  • I will yes. By semi lit I meant main lights are off and the mood lights are filling in the dark, kind of hard to explain

    – Nate
    5 hours ago







1




1





How dark is 'semi-lit'? Will you have any chance to get in there beforehand & check the camera will even focus in that light?

– Tetsujin
5 hours ago





How dark is 'semi-lit'? Will you have any chance to get in there beforehand & check the camera will even focus in that light?

– Tetsujin
5 hours ago













I will yes. By semi lit I meant main lights are off and the mood lights are filling in the dark, kind of hard to explain

– Nate
5 hours ago





I will yes. By semi lit I meant main lights are off and the mood lights are filling in the dark, kind of hard to explain

– Nate
5 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2














Bumping up pictures in post will introduce more noise than bumping up ISO in camera. Do not be afraid of high ISOs if there is no way to avoid them.



For decent background separation. use the widest aperture that you can.



If he does not move too much (i.e. wildly gesticulating), 1/250s should be more than enough.



Also: It is your decision entirely, but do not be afraid of motion blur - while having arms blurred out of existence might be a bad thing, having a slight blur might give a more dynamic look.






share|improve this answer























  • Thanks for that! That’s really great to know! My only concern with a wide aperture is not totally disconnecting him from the background. Like parts of him appearing slightly blurry, I’ve seen people recommend an aperture of 2.8 but I guess it’ll come down to playing with it. Thanks!

    – Nate
    5 hours ago











  • @Nate You can get a decent feeling for the effect of apertures even by shooting inanimate objects - it was one of the first things I did when getting a cam, and I did it mostly by shooting plants. And if you want it on paper: There are apps and web sites to calculate the DOF - just look for "DOF calculator". :-)

    – flolilo
    5 hours ago


















1














If you can get in there beforehand & do some tests, that will benefit greatly.



You need to check for several things...



  • that the camera can even find focus in low light, especially if your subject is not going to be specifically lit.


  • that your mood lighting is not going to have to be sacrificed [either by burning it right out or adding additional subject lighting] in order to get your subject bright enough.


  • that you can balance high ISO against this in such a way as your darker areas are not going to be awash with noise.


  • do some colour tests, preferably using a volunteer for skin-tones, if not also a grey card held by the volunteer, so you can set your white balance beforehand; otherwise the mood lighting might adversely influence your tones - differently for every shot.


  • if you can achieve all the above, then test different focussing & light sensor modes on your camera, if available. You may end up using AF-continuous [or sport] mode to follow your subject whilst in motion, spot-metering so your subject is prioritised over anything else - or you may even end up on manual or aperture-preferred, to save the camera from making wildly different decisions per shot.






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "61"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    Nate is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f106692%2fhow-can-i-best-take-pictures-of-a-moving-speaker-in-a-dark-room-with-accent-ligh%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2














    Bumping up pictures in post will introduce more noise than bumping up ISO in camera. Do not be afraid of high ISOs if there is no way to avoid them.



    For decent background separation. use the widest aperture that you can.



    If he does not move too much (i.e. wildly gesticulating), 1/250s should be more than enough.



    Also: It is your decision entirely, but do not be afraid of motion blur - while having arms blurred out of existence might be a bad thing, having a slight blur might give a more dynamic look.






    share|improve this answer























    • Thanks for that! That’s really great to know! My only concern with a wide aperture is not totally disconnecting him from the background. Like parts of him appearing slightly blurry, I’ve seen people recommend an aperture of 2.8 but I guess it’ll come down to playing with it. Thanks!

      – Nate
      5 hours ago











    • @Nate You can get a decent feeling for the effect of apertures even by shooting inanimate objects - it was one of the first things I did when getting a cam, and I did it mostly by shooting plants. And if you want it on paper: There are apps and web sites to calculate the DOF - just look for "DOF calculator". :-)

      – flolilo
      5 hours ago















    2














    Bumping up pictures in post will introduce more noise than bumping up ISO in camera. Do not be afraid of high ISOs if there is no way to avoid them.



    For decent background separation. use the widest aperture that you can.



    If he does not move too much (i.e. wildly gesticulating), 1/250s should be more than enough.



    Also: It is your decision entirely, but do not be afraid of motion blur - while having arms blurred out of existence might be a bad thing, having a slight blur might give a more dynamic look.






    share|improve this answer























    • Thanks for that! That’s really great to know! My only concern with a wide aperture is not totally disconnecting him from the background. Like parts of him appearing slightly blurry, I’ve seen people recommend an aperture of 2.8 but I guess it’ll come down to playing with it. Thanks!

      – Nate
      5 hours ago











    • @Nate You can get a decent feeling for the effect of apertures even by shooting inanimate objects - it was one of the first things I did when getting a cam, and I did it mostly by shooting plants. And if you want it on paper: There are apps and web sites to calculate the DOF - just look for "DOF calculator". :-)

      – flolilo
      5 hours ago













    2












    2








    2







    Bumping up pictures in post will introduce more noise than bumping up ISO in camera. Do not be afraid of high ISOs if there is no way to avoid them.



    For decent background separation. use the widest aperture that you can.



    If he does not move too much (i.e. wildly gesticulating), 1/250s should be more than enough.



    Also: It is your decision entirely, but do not be afraid of motion blur - while having arms blurred out of existence might be a bad thing, having a slight blur might give a more dynamic look.






    share|improve this answer













    Bumping up pictures in post will introduce more noise than bumping up ISO in camera. Do not be afraid of high ISOs if there is no way to avoid them.



    For decent background separation. use the widest aperture that you can.



    If he does not move too much (i.e. wildly gesticulating), 1/250s should be more than enough.



    Also: It is your decision entirely, but do not be afraid of motion blur - while having arms blurred out of existence might be a bad thing, having a slight blur might give a more dynamic look.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 5 hours ago









    floliloflolilo

    5,57811839




    5,57811839












    • Thanks for that! That’s really great to know! My only concern with a wide aperture is not totally disconnecting him from the background. Like parts of him appearing slightly blurry, I’ve seen people recommend an aperture of 2.8 but I guess it’ll come down to playing with it. Thanks!

      – Nate
      5 hours ago











    • @Nate You can get a decent feeling for the effect of apertures even by shooting inanimate objects - it was one of the first things I did when getting a cam, and I did it mostly by shooting plants. And if you want it on paper: There are apps and web sites to calculate the DOF - just look for "DOF calculator". :-)

      – flolilo
      5 hours ago

















    • Thanks for that! That’s really great to know! My only concern with a wide aperture is not totally disconnecting him from the background. Like parts of him appearing slightly blurry, I’ve seen people recommend an aperture of 2.8 but I guess it’ll come down to playing with it. Thanks!

      – Nate
      5 hours ago











    • @Nate You can get a decent feeling for the effect of apertures even by shooting inanimate objects - it was one of the first things I did when getting a cam, and I did it mostly by shooting plants. And if you want it on paper: There are apps and web sites to calculate the DOF - just look for "DOF calculator". :-)

      – flolilo
      5 hours ago
















    Thanks for that! That’s really great to know! My only concern with a wide aperture is not totally disconnecting him from the background. Like parts of him appearing slightly blurry, I’ve seen people recommend an aperture of 2.8 but I guess it’ll come down to playing with it. Thanks!

    – Nate
    5 hours ago





    Thanks for that! That’s really great to know! My only concern with a wide aperture is not totally disconnecting him from the background. Like parts of him appearing slightly blurry, I’ve seen people recommend an aperture of 2.8 but I guess it’ll come down to playing with it. Thanks!

    – Nate
    5 hours ago













    @Nate You can get a decent feeling for the effect of apertures even by shooting inanimate objects - it was one of the first things I did when getting a cam, and I did it mostly by shooting plants. And if you want it on paper: There are apps and web sites to calculate the DOF - just look for "DOF calculator". :-)

    – flolilo
    5 hours ago





    @Nate You can get a decent feeling for the effect of apertures even by shooting inanimate objects - it was one of the first things I did when getting a cam, and I did it mostly by shooting plants. And if you want it on paper: There are apps and web sites to calculate the DOF - just look for "DOF calculator". :-)

    – flolilo
    5 hours ago













    1














    If you can get in there beforehand & do some tests, that will benefit greatly.



    You need to check for several things...



    • that the camera can even find focus in low light, especially if your subject is not going to be specifically lit.


    • that your mood lighting is not going to have to be sacrificed [either by burning it right out or adding additional subject lighting] in order to get your subject bright enough.


    • that you can balance high ISO against this in such a way as your darker areas are not going to be awash with noise.


    • do some colour tests, preferably using a volunteer for skin-tones, if not also a grey card held by the volunteer, so you can set your white balance beforehand; otherwise the mood lighting might adversely influence your tones - differently for every shot.


    • if you can achieve all the above, then test different focussing & light sensor modes on your camera, if available. You may end up using AF-continuous [or sport] mode to follow your subject whilst in motion, spot-metering so your subject is prioritised over anything else - or you may even end up on manual or aperture-preferred, to save the camera from making wildly different decisions per shot.






    share|improve this answer



























      1














      If you can get in there beforehand & do some tests, that will benefit greatly.



      You need to check for several things...



      • that the camera can even find focus in low light, especially if your subject is not going to be specifically lit.


      • that your mood lighting is not going to have to be sacrificed [either by burning it right out or adding additional subject lighting] in order to get your subject bright enough.


      • that you can balance high ISO against this in such a way as your darker areas are not going to be awash with noise.


      • do some colour tests, preferably using a volunteer for skin-tones, if not also a grey card held by the volunteer, so you can set your white balance beforehand; otherwise the mood lighting might adversely influence your tones - differently for every shot.


      • if you can achieve all the above, then test different focussing & light sensor modes on your camera, if available. You may end up using AF-continuous [or sport] mode to follow your subject whilst in motion, spot-metering so your subject is prioritised over anything else - or you may even end up on manual or aperture-preferred, to save the camera from making wildly different decisions per shot.






      share|improve this answer

























        1












        1








        1







        If you can get in there beforehand & do some tests, that will benefit greatly.



        You need to check for several things...



        • that the camera can even find focus in low light, especially if your subject is not going to be specifically lit.


        • that your mood lighting is not going to have to be sacrificed [either by burning it right out or adding additional subject lighting] in order to get your subject bright enough.


        • that you can balance high ISO against this in such a way as your darker areas are not going to be awash with noise.


        • do some colour tests, preferably using a volunteer for skin-tones, if not also a grey card held by the volunteer, so you can set your white balance beforehand; otherwise the mood lighting might adversely influence your tones - differently for every shot.


        • if you can achieve all the above, then test different focussing & light sensor modes on your camera, if available. You may end up using AF-continuous [or sport] mode to follow your subject whilst in motion, spot-metering so your subject is prioritised over anything else - or you may even end up on manual or aperture-preferred, to save the camera from making wildly different decisions per shot.






        share|improve this answer













        If you can get in there beforehand & do some tests, that will benefit greatly.



        You need to check for several things...



        • that the camera can even find focus in low light, especially if your subject is not going to be specifically lit.


        • that your mood lighting is not going to have to be sacrificed [either by burning it right out or adding additional subject lighting] in order to get your subject bright enough.


        • that you can balance high ISO against this in such a way as your darker areas are not going to be awash with noise.


        • do some colour tests, preferably using a volunteer for skin-tones, if not also a grey card held by the volunteer, so you can set your white balance beforehand; otherwise the mood lighting might adversely influence your tones - differently for every shot.


        • if you can achieve all the above, then test different focussing & light sensor modes on your camera, if available. You may end up using AF-continuous [or sport] mode to follow your subject whilst in motion, spot-metering so your subject is prioritised over anything else - or you may even end up on manual or aperture-preferred, to save the camera from making wildly different decisions per shot.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 4 hours ago









        TetsujinTetsujin

        8,19821948




        8,19821948




















            Nate is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Nate is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Nate is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            Nate is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to Photography Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f106692%2fhow-can-i-best-take-pictures-of-a-moving-speaker-in-a-dark-room-with-accent-ligh%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Category:Fedor von Bock Media in category "Fedor von Bock"Navigation menuUpload mediaISNI: 0000 0000 5511 3417VIAF ID: 24712551GND ID: 119294796Library of Congress authority ID: n96068363BnF ID: 12534305fSUDOC authorities ID: 034604189Open Library ID: OL338253ANKCR AUT ID: jn19990000869National Library of Israel ID: 000514068National Thesaurus for Author Names ID: 341574317ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

            Reverse int within the 32-bit signed integer range: [−2^31, 2^31 − 1]Combining two 32-bit integers into one 64-bit integerDetermine if an int is within rangeLossy packing 32 bit integer to 16 bitComputing the square root of a 64-bit integerKeeping integer addition within boundsSafe multiplication of two 64-bit signed integersLeetcode 10: Regular Expression MatchingSigned integer-to-ascii x86_64 assembler macroReverse the digits of an Integer“Add two numbers given in reverse order from a linked list”

            Kiel Indholdsfortegnelse Historie | Transport og færgeforbindelser | Sejlsport og anden sport | Kultur | Kendte personer fra Kiel | Noter | Litteratur | Eksterne henvisninger | Navigationsmenuwww.kiel.de54°19′31″N 10°8′26″Ø / 54.32528°N 10.14056°Ø / 54.32528; 10.14056Oberbürgermeister Dr. Ulf Kämpferwww.statistik-nord.deDen danske Stats StatistikKiels hjemmesiderrrWorldCat312794080n790547494030481-4