What could be the right powersource for 15 seconds lifespan disposable giant chainsaw? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InWhich edge shape is better to cut things with for a chain sword type/style?If we had easier access to antimatter, how could we use it?Space weaponry?Can one Battlestar conquer Earth?Could the principle of the zero point energy universe be used for infinite energy?Sci-fi Science: Physics of Impossibru: “Force fields”In a SciFi world, how could a “suit” cary 1000X+ times the wearer's weight/volume?Feasibility of a village improving its economy through hot springsThe time it takes to advance a medieval period country to a spacefaring intergalactic countryWhat (modern) weapons could be used to destroy skeletal enemies as completely as possible?What would be the ideal way to weaponize plasma?
How to change the limits of integration
What is the meaning of Triage in Cybersec world?
Could JWST stay at L2 "forever"?
How to manage monthly salary
Should I write numbers in words or as numerals when there are multiple next to each other?
What is the best strategy for white in this position?
What is the steepest angle that a canal can be traversable without locks?
How do you say "canon" as in "official for a story universe"?
Deadlock Graph and Interpretation, solution to avoid
What is this 4-propeller plane?
Geography at the pixel level
Time travel alters history but people keep saying nothing's changed
Limit to 0 ambiguity
What can other administrators access on my machine?
In microwave frequencies, do you use a circulator when you need a (near) perfect diode?
Spanish for "widget"
What does "sndry explns" mean in one of the Hitchhiker's guide books?
How to answer pointed "are you quitting" questioning when I don't want them to suspect
The difference between dialogue marks
Access elements in std::string where positon of string is greater than its size
Potential by Assembling Charges
I looked up a future colleague on LinkedIn before I started a job. I told my colleague about it and he seemed surprised. Should I apologize?
Does it makes sense to buy a new cycle to learn riding?
Where does the "burst of radiance" from Holy Weapon originate?
What could be the right powersource for 15 seconds lifespan disposable giant chainsaw?
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InWhich edge shape is better to cut things with for a chain sword type/style?If we had easier access to antimatter, how could we use it?Space weaponry?Can one Battlestar conquer Earth?Could the principle of the zero point energy universe be used for infinite energy?Sci-fi Science: Physics of Impossibru: “Force fields”In a SciFi world, how could a “suit” cary 1000X+ times the wearer's weight/volume?Feasibility of a village improving its economy through hot springsThe time it takes to advance a medieval period country to a spacefaring intergalactic countryWhat (modern) weapons could be used to destroy skeletal enemies as completely as possible?What would be the ideal way to weaponize plasma?
$begingroup$
Imagine when a jet fighter swoops in to drop a 400 pounds giant chainsaw to you just so that you can use it to grind down one problematic enemy into a pulp then discard it a foot away from you. What power source would suit such a weapon with only 1 instant use before breaking itself apart?
reality-check technology science-fiction energy
$endgroup$
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
Imagine when a jet fighter swoops in to drop a 400 pounds giant chainsaw to you just so that you can use it to grind down one problematic enemy into a pulp then discard it a foot away from you. What power source would suit such a weapon with only 1 instant use before breaking itself apart?
reality-check technology science-fiction energy
$endgroup$
6
$begingroup$
This whole concept seems unwise to me. 400lbs is crazy amount of weight to wield, which assume the chainsaw survives landing, and it lands near you. Range is way too close to have a problematic enemy for my comfort. Instead how about 100lbs or so of frag grenades or similar you can use from a safe distance. Range, damages, easy to use, and multiples can be deployed to same target easily.
$endgroup$
– cybernard
15 hours ago
8
$begingroup$
@cybernard The whole concept is batshit insane. It's obviously intended for a fictional universe driven by the rule of cool and not by rationality.
$endgroup$
– Philipp
15 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
@Philipp there is rule of cool and there's stuff that breaks the suspension of disbelief. I do believe that with chainsaw planes, any hope for realism goes right out the window... which doesn't necessarily make the resulting fiction bad, but it does make the need for defined inner workings quite a bit less necessary.
$endgroup$
– John Dvorak
14 hours ago
5
$begingroup$
In a universe where coolness trumps sanity when it comes to conflict, chainsaw planes make perfect sense. As do superhero landings (They’re hell on the knees), giant floating air fortresses and flashy uniforms with the underpants on the outside. Basically this is the kind of thing any superhero film could benefit from.
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
13 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
I initially read this as the jet dropping the chainsaw directly on the enemy, which is also awesome.
$endgroup$
– TKK
7 hours ago
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
Imagine when a jet fighter swoops in to drop a 400 pounds giant chainsaw to you just so that you can use it to grind down one problematic enemy into a pulp then discard it a foot away from you. What power source would suit such a weapon with only 1 instant use before breaking itself apart?
reality-check technology science-fiction energy
$endgroup$
Imagine when a jet fighter swoops in to drop a 400 pounds giant chainsaw to you just so that you can use it to grind down one problematic enemy into a pulp then discard it a foot away from you. What power source would suit such a weapon with only 1 instant use before breaking itself apart?
reality-check technology science-fiction energy
reality-check technology science-fiction energy
edited 15 hours ago
Cyn
11.2k12453
11.2k12453
asked 20 hours ago
67ironwhale67ironwhale
10115
10115
6
$begingroup$
This whole concept seems unwise to me. 400lbs is crazy amount of weight to wield, which assume the chainsaw survives landing, and it lands near you. Range is way too close to have a problematic enemy for my comfort. Instead how about 100lbs or so of frag grenades or similar you can use from a safe distance. Range, damages, easy to use, and multiples can be deployed to same target easily.
$endgroup$
– cybernard
15 hours ago
8
$begingroup$
@cybernard The whole concept is batshit insane. It's obviously intended for a fictional universe driven by the rule of cool and not by rationality.
$endgroup$
– Philipp
15 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
@Philipp there is rule of cool and there's stuff that breaks the suspension of disbelief. I do believe that with chainsaw planes, any hope for realism goes right out the window... which doesn't necessarily make the resulting fiction bad, but it does make the need for defined inner workings quite a bit less necessary.
$endgroup$
– John Dvorak
14 hours ago
5
$begingroup$
In a universe where coolness trumps sanity when it comes to conflict, chainsaw planes make perfect sense. As do superhero landings (They’re hell on the knees), giant floating air fortresses and flashy uniforms with the underpants on the outside. Basically this is the kind of thing any superhero film could benefit from.
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
13 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
I initially read this as the jet dropping the chainsaw directly on the enemy, which is also awesome.
$endgroup$
– TKK
7 hours ago
|
show 5 more comments
6
$begingroup$
This whole concept seems unwise to me. 400lbs is crazy amount of weight to wield, which assume the chainsaw survives landing, and it lands near you. Range is way too close to have a problematic enemy for my comfort. Instead how about 100lbs or so of frag grenades or similar you can use from a safe distance. Range, damages, easy to use, and multiples can be deployed to same target easily.
$endgroup$
– cybernard
15 hours ago
8
$begingroup$
@cybernard The whole concept is batshit insane. It's obviously intended for a fictional universe driven by the rule of cool and not by rationality.
$endgroup$
– Philipp
15 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
@Philipp there is rule of cool and there's stuff that breaks the suspension of disbelief. I do believe that with chainsaw planes, any hope for realism goes right out the window... which doesn't necessarily make the resulting fiction bad, but it does make the need for defined inner workings quite a bit less necessary.
$endgroup$
– John Dvorak
14 hours ago
5
$begingroup$
In a universe where coolness trumps sanity when it comes to conflict, chainsaw planes make perfect sense. As do superhero landings (They’re hell on the knees), giant floating air fortresses and flashy uniforms with the underpants on the outside. Basically this is the kind of thing any superhero film could benefit from.
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
13 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
I initially read this as the jet dropping the chainsaw directly on the enemy, which is also awesome.
$endgroup$
– TKK
7 hours ago
6
6
$begingroup$
This whole concept seems unwise to me. 400lbs is crazy amount of weight to wield, which assume the chainsaw survives landing, and it lands near you. Range is way too close to have a problematic enemy for my comfort. Instead how about 100lbs or so of frag grenades or similar you can use from a safe distance. Range, damages, easy to use, and multiples can be deployed to same target easily.
$endgroup$
– cybernard
15 hours ago
$begingroup$
This whole concept seems unwise to me. 400lbs is crazy amount of weight to wield, which assume the chainsaw survives landing, and it lands near you. Range is way too close to have a problematic enemy for my comfort. Instead how about 100lbs or so of frag grenades or similar you can use from a safe distance. Range, damages, easy to use, and multiples can be deployed to same target easily.
$endgroup$
– cybernard
15 hours ago
8
8
$begingroup$
@cybernard The whole concept is batshit insane. It's obviously intended for a fictional universe driven by the rule of cool and not by rationality.
$endgroup$
– Philipp
15 hours ago
$begingroup$
@cybernard The whole concept is batshit insane. It's obviously intended for a fictional universe driven by the rule of cool and not by rationality.
$endgroup$
– Philipp
15 hours ago
4
4
$begingroup$
@Philipp there is rule of cool and there's stuff that breaks the suspension of disbelief. I do believe that with chainsaw planes, any hope for realism goes right out the window... which doesn't necessarily make the resulting fiction bad, but it does make the need for defined inner workings quite a bit less necessary.
$endgroup$
– John Dvorak
14 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Philipp there is rule of cool and there's stuff that breaks the suspension of disbelief. I do believe that with chainsaw planes, any hope for realism goes right out the window... which doesn't necessarily make the resulting fiction bad, but it does make the need for defined inner workings quite a bit less necessary.
$endgroup$
– John Dvorak
14 hours ago
5
5
$begingroup$
In a universe where coolness trumps sanity when it comes to conflict, chainsaw planes make perfect sense. As do superhero landings (They’re hell on the knees), giant floating air fortresses and flashy uniforms with the underpants on the outside. Basically this is the kind of thing any superhero film could benefit from.
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
In a universe where coolness trumps sanity when it comes to conflict, chainsaw planes make perfect sense. As do superhero landings (They’re hell on the knees), giant floating air fortresses and flashy uniforms with the underpants on the outside. Basically this is the kind of thing any superhero film could benefit from.
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
13 hours ago
4
4
$begingroup$
I initially read this as the jet dropping the chainsaw directly on the enemy, which is also awesome.
$endgroup$
– TKK
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
I initially read this as the jet dropping the chainsaw directly on the enemy, which is also awesome.
$endgroup$
– TKK
7 hours ago
|
show 5 more comments
13 Answers
13
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Giant coiled spring.
It would uncoil itself and drive the chain. It would provide loads of power on demand. Storing that kind of energy as a coiled spring is dangerous, but I see that as a positive thing for your scenario.
$endgroup$
5
$begingroup$
+1 for being rechargeable
$endgroup$
– Trevor D
17 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
I'd go with this. See also Bacigalupi's WIndup Girl series -- with genetically designed organic springs as energy sources.
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
17 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
I like this. It's not very realistic, but it sure as heck is cool..
$endgroup$
– John Dvorak
13 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
@JohnDvorak Ah yes, the quest for a realistic power source for a single use jet-delivered chainsaw.
$endgroup$
– corsiKa
5 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Spring tension can hold the drive train together as well. When the spring looses tension it could literally fall apart as the question suggests. If you've ever taken apart a tape measure and had a part slip out of your hands you'll get what I'm talking about.
$endgroup$
– JPhi1618
2 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Capacitors. These are electric components which store an electric charge for a limited amount of time and can release it very rapidly. They are relatively cheap and easy to manufacture. They are also reusable, but that doesn't matter in this case.
Capacitors can be manufactured in many different ways depending on their desired characteristics. But in general they have a lower energy density than chemical power cells, but they can release their stored energy a lot faster.
Capacitors are usually not designed to hold a charge for longer than a couple hours, so the capacitors either need to be charged before the mission or during the mission from the fighter's internal power supply.
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
"... usually not designed to hold a charge..." ?? Depends drastically on the application. Whatever you do, never touch the flyback capacitor on a CRT without shorting it first. They hold significant voltage for years.
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
17 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@CarlWitthoft, years is a bit of an exaggeration. The self discharge rate of capacitors (as in no bleeder resistors) is still in the range of days. Supercapacitors have a lower self discharge rate but is still not remotely in the realm of years. Though, I'm always happy to be wrong, I did some quick checking but maybe I missed some edge case where that's true.
$endgroup$
– Jarrod Christman
15 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
Capacitor 'hold time' depends on design and materials used. While they'll slowly leak it is well within the realm of possibility to design such a capacitor that could be charged on loading of the weapon and last for a 6-12 hour mission with useful load. Also keep in mind that 'discharged' doesn't always mean 'empty' - Very large caps can still hold enough to give you a solid kick years later, even if they're well below 'useful' levels that it was intended to be used at. In short: Don't lick caps.
$endgroup$
– TheLuckless
15 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I updated the answer in light of the recent comments.
$endgroup$
– Philipp
15 hours ago
$begingroup$
@TheLuckless if it's possible for it to hold charge years later, why can't you make us of that to develop a capacitor that holds charge for years?
$endgroup$
– Nathan Hinchey
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Pyrotechnics, in the form of twin spinning rockets rotating the saw axle. You have jet fighters, missiles would look like an obvious option. And as a bonus, a faulty device would explode throwing shrapnel into the enemy.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I would go for a pneumatic solution. It can support easily a 40 pound high pressure container storing sufficient energy for 15 seconds.
New contributor
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Also consider the giant farting sound on, ahem, discharge. Use methane as the gas, and then light the exhaust, and use the flame jets. IDK how, but use them.
$endgroup$
– Neal
10 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Neal simple: what's better than a chainsaw at maiming your enemy? The MurderCo Rocket-Propelled Chainsaw (patents pending)! Why use measly human (or whatever other species) appendages to thrust your chainsaw into your enemy when our patented diverters use the combustion exhaust to launch it at your enemy? Warning, adult supervision required, MurderCo is not responsible for loss of limbs or life, property damage, or damages caused by Acts of Stupid (which includes all actions taken using the MurderCo RPC).
$endgroup$
– Doktor J
9 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Well if you only need it very briefly I'd recommend a power cell.
Where batteries provide a slow trickle of stored energy over time,power cells can dump all of their energy in an instant. So that chainsaw purpose built to be disposable but very deadly could literally be torn apart from the energy it exerts in its short period of activity.
Also this means that being disposable the chainsaw would be made of cheaper materials. Since the power cell never needs to be replaced as it is a one-off use it can be made non-rechargeable and self-destructing. Not in the way it blows up when used, but it burns out the internal storage from the incredible heat and shock of the energy release.
All in all, the chainsaws shall exist. And they shall be terrifying. Maybe just make the edge out of carbon nano-tubes? Nano-tubes can also be used to store energy within their mass much like batteries or power cells. So you could literally make the chainsaw one giant power cell made of an extremely energy dense but light material that at 400 lbs would have enough power to immolate an elephant entirely most likely.
Your chainsaw would have the power of a bomb, all put towards a few glorious seconds to a minute at most of incredibly destructive power as the blade super heats and the chainsaw loses cohesion as the power which simultaneously kept it together suddenly runs out.
I hope this helps.
$endgroup$
4
$begingroup$
Aren't batteries and power cells the same thing? A battery is a group of several cells linked together. If you cut open something like an AA battery, you will find button cells inside of it. Even car batteries are made up of several different cells.
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
19 hours ago
$begingroup$
@LiamMorris In fact, it may even be the opposite: each power gives you some power, so you want as many as possible to have the highest possible power (but for the shortest time)
$endgroup$
– Eth
19 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
Maybe use super capacitors. They can deliver huge amount of power in short time.
$endgroup$
– jnovacho
18 hours ago
$begingroup$
@jnovacho Good idea. I will write an answer based on this.
$endgroup$
– Philipp
18 hours ago
$begingroup$
What's this power cell you are talking about?
$endgroup$
– jpa
15 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
As an alternative to coiled spring you can have your own gyro core (or flywheel).
Make a small and dense wheel to rotate very fast on pins in your chainsaw, virtually without energy loss, and then give it all away to chain blades. After it is discharged it becomes a useless piece of metal without any electronics or stuff. It is also much safer to operate than coiled spring.
If anything it will also stabilize delivery of this chainsaw.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Trying to manoeuvre such a weapon would be nigh on impossible if you used it to store any appreciable energy, surely?
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
You could put your gyro core into gyro stabilizer, which will let you handle such weapon. Or maybe it's not even necessary given the question details.
$endgroup$
– alamar
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Probably storing the spun up weapons in opposite-spun pairs always would compensate some unwanted effect AND stabilize your aircraft?
$endgroup$
– rackandboneman
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Just use counter-rotating gyros.
$endgroup$
– RBarryYoung
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Well possibly the easiest power source to use would be a battery, you can accurately determine how much ‘life’ it could give to a piece of electronics by setting the max capacity and charging it until it is full.
Although, if your problem is just that you need to get the chainsaws down safely, i would recommend using parachutes or heavily padded drop boxes to ensure the contents were undamaged. At that point you could use whatever fuel you liked as it would not be damaged from the fall.
However, i don’t think you’d want to use chainsaws, especially ones that heavy, as weapons. They are not particularly effective, are slow and 400 pounds is about the weight of two humans. At that point you might as well be using a giant maul instead. Here is an answer where i explained the issues with chainsaw weapons. There is also a link to a youtube video in my answer which demonstrates my point.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
But chainsaws are FUN . Signed, Anonymous From Texas
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
17 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since this is the sort of weapon that Coyote would be using against Roadrunner, it must be powered by the future power supply du jour.
In the 1950s that would have meant nuclear power, nowadays everything is battery powered, though some consider that the future is in hydrogen.
It very much depends on the tone of the situation you're creating.
The clean and neat nature of modern hydrogen fuel cells and batteries may not fit the context, so you might want to find some way of making it spew smoke and fire as it's powered up, that means coal or at the least diesel powered.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Expanding on Willk's answer here:
You have a "lander" and a chainsaw. The chainsaw is spring-powered. The lander has multiple rotors, say 3, that both break the fall and charge spring. It would basically look like a quadrocopter with a chainsaw at the bottom falling down.
A ratchet prevents the spring from discharging. A trigger mechanism in the chainsaw releases the ratchet and directs its power from the rotor coupling to the saw's chain - the chainsaw is running, purely from the energy from the fall.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Googling "battery in missiles" led me to the page of a company manufacturing and selling such solutions.
I am guessing your solution would be "thermal battery". I do not think they are selling a solution just for you but the duration and power can be tailored to application. Also, such batteries are used by military using similar "mil-tech" would probably fit the back story.
Also such batteries are single use, durable, reliable and have long shelf life.
Some of the other battery chemistries they offer might work better for you, so you might want to check them out. They might be rechargeable though.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I would go for a chemistry based solution. Think of current engines; they are all based on the concept of explosions. Now think of a giant explosion happening on release of the chainsaw. It would create enough pressure to power the chainsaw for quite some time.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Launching from a plane, that chainsaw is going to waste a lot of nice gravitational energy, which could be used for much more interesting tasks, such as providing motion to the chainsaw itself.
So, the chainsaw itself is tethered to the plane with a very long roller chain, which is connected to a pinion inside the chainsaw (think of a Beyblade launcher).
When launched from the plane, the chainsaw falls, so that the roller chain makes the pinion start rotating. The pinion will then transmit the motion to the chainsaw, so that it will rotate at full speed when touching ground!
Alternatively, a parachute could open and hold a reel with the roller chain tethered to the chainsaw, which is still falling relative to the parachute.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Dual liquid explosive, the force would trash the mechanism but its a one use weapon.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
These are normally called binary explosives, just for reference.
$endgroup$
– ltmauve
6 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "579"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143551%2fwhat-could-be-the-right-powersource-for-15-seconds-lifespan-disposable-giant-cha%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
13 Answers
13
active
oldest
votes
13 Answers
13
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Giant coiled spring.
It would uncoil itself and drive the chain. It would provide loads of power on demand. Storing that kind of energy as a coiled spring is dangerous, but I see that as a positive thing for your scenario.
$endgroup$
5
$begingroup$
+1 for being rechargeable
$endgroup$
– Trevor D
17 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
I'd go with this. See also Bacigalupi's WIndup Girl series -- with genetically designed organic springs as energy sources.
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
17 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
I like this. It's not very realistic, but it sure as heck is cool..
$endgroup$
– John Dvorak
13 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
@JohnDvorak Ah yes, the quest for a realistic power source for a single use jet-delivered chainsaw.
$endgroup$
– corsiKa
5 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Spring tension can hold the drive train together as well. When the spring looses tension it could literally fall apart as the question suggests. If you've ever taken apart a tape measure and had a part slip out of your hands you'll get what I'm talking about.
$endgroup$
– JPhi1618
2 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Giant coiled spring.
It would uncoil itself and drive the chain. It would provide loads of power on demand. Storing that kind of energy as a coiled spring is dangerous, but I see that as a positive thing for your scenario.
$endgroup$
5
$begingroup$
+1 for being rechargeable
$endgroup$
– Trevor D
17 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
I'd go with this. See also Bacigalupi's WIndup Girl series -- with genetically designed organic springs as energy sources.
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
17 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
I like this. It's not very realistic, but it sure as heck is cool..
$endgroup$
– John Dvorak
13 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
@JohnDvorak Ah yes, the quest for a realistic power source for a single use jet-delivered chainsaw.
$endgroup$
– corsiKa
5 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Spring tension can hold the drive train together as well. When the spring looses tension it could literally fall apart as the question suggests. If you've ever taken apart a tape measure and had a part slip out of your hands you'll get what I'm talking about.
$endgroup$
– JPhi1618
2 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Giant coiled spring.
It would uncoil itself and drive the chain. It would provide loads of power on demand. Storing that kind of energy as a coiled spring is dangerous, but I see that as a positive thing for your scenario.
$endgroup$
Giant coiled spring.
It would uncoil itself and drive the chain. It would provide loads of power on demand. Storing that kind of energy as a coiled spring is dangerous, but I see that as a positive thing for your scenario.
answered 19 hours ago
WillkWillk
117k27220488
117k27220488
5
$begingroup$
+1 for being rechargeable
$endgroup$
– Trevor D
17 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
I'd go with this. See also Bacigalupi's WIndup Girl series -- with genetically designed organic springs as energy sources.
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
17 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
I like this. It's not very realistic, but it sure as heck is cool..
$endgroup$
– John Dvorak
13 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
@JohnDvorak Ah yes, the quest for a realistic power source for a single use jet-delivered chainsaw.
$endgroup$
– corsiKa
5 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Spring tension can hold the drive train together as well. When the spring looses tension it could literally fall apart as the question suggests. If you've ever taken apart a tape measure and had a part slip out of your hands you'll get what I'm talking about.
$endgroup$
– JPhi1618
2 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
5
$begingroup$
+1 for being rechargeable
$endgroup$
– Trevor D
17 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
I'd go with this. See also Bacigalupi's WIndup Girl series -- with genetically designed organic springs as energy sources.
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
17 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
I like this. It's not very realistic, but it sure as heck is cool..
$endgroup$
– John Dvorak
13 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
@JohnDvorak Ah yes, the quest for a realistic power source for a single use jet-delivered chainsaw.
$endgroup$
– corsiKa
5 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Spring tension can hold the drive train together as well. When the spring looses tension it could literally fall apart as the question suggests. If you've ever taken apart a tape measure and had a part slip out of your hands you'll get what I'm talking about.
$endgroup$
– JPhi1618
2 hours ago
5
5
$begingroup$
+1 for being rechargeable
$endgroup$
– Trevor D
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
+1 for being rechargeable
$endgroup$
– Trevor D
17 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
I'd go with this. See also Bacigalupi's WIndup Girl series -- with genetically designed organic springs as energy sources.
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
I'd go with this. See also Bacigalupi's WIndup Girl series -- with genetically designed organic springs as energy sources.
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
17 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
I like this. It's not very realistic, but it sure as heck is cool..
$endgroup$
– John Dvorak
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
I like this. It's not very realistic, but it sure as heck is cool..
$endgroup$
– John Dvorak
13 hours ago
3
3
$begingroup$
@JohnDvorak Ah yes, the quest for a realistic power source for a single use jet-delivered chainsaw.
$endgroup$
– corsiKa
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@JohnDvorak Ah yes, the quest for a realistic power source for a single use jet-delivered chainsaw.
$endgroup$
– corsiKa
5 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Spring tension can hold the drive train together as well. When the spring looses tension it could literally fall apart as the question suggests. If you've ever taken apart a tape measure and had a part slip out of your hands you'll get what I'm talking about.
$endgroup$
– JPhi1618
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Spring tension can hold the drive train together as well. When the spring looses tension it could literally fall apart as the question suggests. If you've ever taken apart a tape measure and had a part slip out of your hands you'll get what I'm talking about.
$endgroup$
– JPhi1618
2 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Capacitors. These are electric components which store an electric charge for a limited amount of time and can release it very rapidly. They are relatively cheap and easy to manufacture. They are also reusable, but that doesn't matter in this case.
Capacitors can be manufactured in many different ways depending on their desired characteristics. But in general they have a lower energy density than chemical power cells, but they can release their stored energy a lot faster.
Capacitors are usually not designed to hold a charge for longer than a couple hours, so the capacitors either need to be charged before the mission or during the mission from the fighter's internal power supply.
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
"... usually not designed to hold a charge..." ?? Depends drastically on the application. Whatever you do, never touch the flyback capacitor on a CRT without shorting it first. They hold significant voltage for years.
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
17 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@CarlWitthoft, years is a bit of an exaggeration. The self discharge rate of capacitors (as in no bleeder resistors) is still in the range of days. Supercapacitors have a lower self discharge rate but is still not remotely in the realm of years. Though, I'm always happy to be wrong, I did some quick checking but maybe I missed some edge case where that's true.
$endgroup$
– Jarrod Christman
15 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
Capacitor 'hold time' depends on design and materials used. While they'll slowly leak it is well within the realm of possibility to design such a capacitor that could be charged on loading of the weapon and last for a 6-12 hour mission with useful load. Also keep in mind that 'discharged' doesn't always mean 'empty' - Very large caps can still hold enough to give you a solid kick years later, even if they're well below 'useful' levels that it was intended to be used at. In short: Don't lick caps.
$endgroup$
– TheLuckless
15 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I updated the answer in light of the recent comments.
$endgroup$
– Philipp
15 hours ago
$begingroup$
@TheLuckless if it's possible for it to hold charge years later, why can't you make us of that to develop a capacitor that holds charge for years?
$endgroup$
– Nathan Hinchey
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Capacitors. These are electric components which store an electric charge for a limited amount of time and can release it very rapidly. They are relatively cheap and easy to manufacture. They are also reusable, but that doesn't matter in this case.
Capacitors can be manufactured in many different ways depending on their desired characteristics. But in general they have a lower energy density than chemical power cells, but they can release their stored energy a lot faster.
Capacitors are usually not designed to hold a charge for longer than a couple hours, so the capacitors either need to be charged before the mission or during the mission from the fighter's internal power supply.
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
"... usually not designed to hold a charge..." ?? Depends drastically on the application. Whatever you do, never touch the flyback capacitor on a CRT without shorting it first. They hold significant voltage for years.
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
17 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@CarlWitthoft, years is a bit of an exaggeration. The self discharge rate of capacitors (as in no bleeder resistors) is still in the range of days. Supercapacitors have a lower self discharge rate but is still not remotely in the realm of years. Though, I'm always happy to be wrong, I did some quick checking but maybe I missed some edge case where that's true.
$endgroup$
– Jarrod Christman
15 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
Capacitor 'hold time' depends on design and materials used. While they'll slowly leak it is well within the realm of possibility to design such a capacitor that could be charged on loading of the weapon and last for a 6-12 hour mission with useful load. Also keep in mind that 'discharged' doesn't always mean 'empty' - Very large caps can still hold enough to give you a solid kick years later, even if they're well below 'useful' levels that it was intended to be used at. In short: Don't lick caps.
$endgroup$
– TheLuckless
15 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I updated the answer in light of the recent comments.
$endgroup$
– Philipp
15 hours ago
$begingroup$
@TheLuckless if it's possible for it to hold charge years later, why can't you make us of that to develop a capacitor that holds charge for years?
$endgroup$
– Nathan Hinchey
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Capacitors. These are electric components which store an electric charge for a limited amount of time and can release it very rapidly. They are relatively cheap and easy to manufacture. They are also reusable, but that doesn't matter in this case.
Capacitors can be manufactured in many different ways depending on their desired characteristics. But in general they have a lower energy density than chemical power cells, but they can release their stored energy a lot faster.
Capacitors are usually not designed to hold a charge for longer than a couple hours, so the capacitors either need to be charged before the mission or during the mission from the fighter's internal power supply.
$endgroup$
Capacitors. These are electric components which store an electric charge for a limited amount of time and can release it very rapidly. They are relatively cheap and easy to manufacture. They are also reusable, but that doesn't matter in this case.
Capacitors can be manufactured in many different ways depending on their desired characteristics. But in general they have a lower energy density than chemical power cells, but they can release their stored energy a lot faster.
Capacitors are usually not designed to hold a charge for longer than a couple hours, so the capacitors either need to be charged before the mission or during the mission from the fighter's internal power supply.
edited 15 hours ago
answered 18 hours ago
PhilippPhilipp
31.8k1265123
31.8k1265123
3
$begingroup$
"... usually not designed to hold a charge..." ?? Depends drastically on the application. Whatever you do, never touch the flyback capacitor on a CRT without shorting it first. They hold significant voltage for years.
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
17 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@CarlWitthoft, years is a bit of an exaggeration. The self discharge rate of capacitors (as in no bleeder resistors) is still in the range of days. Supercapacitors have a lower self discharge rate but is still not remotely in the realm of years. Though, I'm always happy to be wrong, I did some quick checking but maybe I missed some edge case where that's true.
$endgroup$
– Jarrod Christman
15 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
Capacitor 'hold time' depends on design and materials used. While they'll slowly leak it is well within the realm of possibility to design such a capacitor that could be charged on loading of the weapon and last for a 6-12 hour mission with useful load. Also keep in mind that 'discharged' doesn't always mean 'empty' - Very large caps can still hold enough to give you a solid kick years later, even if they're well below 'useful' levels that it was intended to be used at. In short: Don't lick caps.
$endgroup$
– TheLuckless
15 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I updated the answer in light of the recent comments.
$endgroup$
– Philipp
15 hours ago
$begingroup$
@TheLuckless if it's possible for it to hold charge years later, why can't you make us of that to develop a capacitor that holds charge for years?
$endgroup$
– Nathan Hinchey
2 hours ago
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
"... usually not designed to hold a charge..." ?? Depends drastically on the application. Whatever you do, never touch the flyback capacitor on a CRT without shorting it first. They hold significant voltage for years.
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
17 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@CarlWitthoft, years is a bit of an exaggeration. The self discharge rate of capacitors (as in no bleeder resistors) is still in the range of days. Supercapacitors have a lower self discharge rate but is still not remotely in the realm of years. Though, I'm always happy to be wrong, I did some quick checking but maybe I missed some edge case where that's true.
$endgroup$
– Jarrod Christman
15 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
Capacitor 'hold time' depends on design and materials used. While they'll slowly leak it is well within the realm of possibility to design such a capacitor that could be charged on loading of the weapon and last for a 6-12 hour mission with useful load. Also keep in mind that 'discharged' doesn't always mean 'empty' - Very large caps can still hold enough to give you a solid kick years later, even if they're well below 'useful' levels that it was intended to be used at. In short: Don't lick caps.
$endgroup$
– TheLuckless
15 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I updated the answer in light of the recent comments.
$endgroup$
– Philipp
15 hours ago
$begingroup$
@TheLuckless if it's possible for it to hold charge years later, why can't you make us of that to develop a capacitor that holds charge for years?
$endgroup$
– Nathan Hinchey
2 hours ago
3
3
$begingroup$
"... usually not designed to hold a charge..." ?? Depends drastically on the application. Whatever you do, never touch the flyback capacitor on a CRT without shorting it first. They hold significant voltage for years.
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
"... usually not designed to hold a charge..." ?? Depends drastically on the application. Whatever you do, never touch the flyback capacitor on a CRT without shorting it first. They hold significant voltage for years.
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
17 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
@CarlWitthoft, years is a bit of an exaggeration. The self discharge rate of capacitors (as in no bleeder resistors) is still in the range of days. Supercapacitors have a lower self discharge rate but is still not remotely in the realm of years. Though, I'm always happy to be wrong, I did some quick checking but maybe I missed some edge case where that's true.
$endgroup$
– Jarrod Christman
15 hours ago
$begingroup$
@CarlWitthoft, years is a bit of an exaggeration. The self discharge rate of capacitors (as in no bleeder resistors) is still in the range of days. Supercapacitors have a lower self discharge rate but is still not remotely in the realm of years. Though, I'm always happy to be wrong, I did some quick checking but maybe I missed some edge case where that's true.
$endgroup$
– Jarrod Christman
15 hours ago
4
4
$begingroup$
Capacitor 'hold time' depends on design and materials used. While they'll slowly leak it is well within the realm of possibility to design such a capacitor that could be charged on loading of the weapon and last for a 6-12 hour mission with useful load. Also keep in mind that 'discharged' doesn't always mean 'empty' - Very large caps can still hold enough to give you a solid kick years later, even if they're well below 'useful' levels that it was intended to be used at. In short: Don't lick caps.
$endgroup$
– TheLuckless
15 hours ago
$begingroup$
Capacitor 'hold time' depends on design and materials used. While they'll slowly leak it is well within the realm of possibility to design such a capacitor that could be charged on loading of the weapon and last for a 6-12 hour mission with useful load. Also keep in mind that 'discharged' doesn't always mean 'empty' - Very large caps can still hold enough to give you a solid kick years later, even if they're well below 'useful' levels that it was intended to be used at. In short: Don't lick caps.
$endgroup$
– TheLuckless
15 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
I updated the answer in light of the recent comments.
$endgroup$
– Philipp
15 hours ago
$begingroup$
I updated the answer in light of the recent comments.
$endgroup$
– Philipp
15 hours ago
$begingroup$
@TheLuckless if it's possible for it to hold charge years later, why can't you make us of that to develop a capacitor that holds charge for years?
$endgroup$
– Nathan Hinchey
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@TheLuckless if it's possible for it to hold charge years later, why can't you make us of that to develop a capacitor that holds charge for years?
$endgroup$
– Nathan Hinchey
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Pyrotechnics, in the form of twin spinning rockets rotating the saw axle. You have jet fighters, missiles would look like an obvious option. And as a bonus, a faulty device would explode throwing shrapnel into the enemy.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Pyrotechnics, in the form of twin spinning rockets rotating the saw axle. You have jet fighters, missiles would look like an obvious option. And as a bonus, a faulty device would explode throwing shrapnel into the enemy.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Pyrotechnics, in the form of twin spinning rockets rotating the saw axle. You have jet fighters, missiles would look like an obvious option. And as a bonus, a faulty device would explode throwing shrapnel into the enemy.
$endgroup$
Pyrotechnics, in the form of twin spinning rockets rotating the saw axle. You have jet fighters, missiles would look like an obvious option. And as a bonus, a faulty device would explode throwing shrapnel into the enemy.
edited 15 hours ago
Lefty
1324
1324
answered 16 hours ago
Dan FernandezDan Fernandez
38116
38116
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I would go for a pneumatic solution. It can support easily a 40 pound high pressure container storing sufficient energy for 15 seconds.
New contributor
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Also consider the giant farting sound on, ahem, discharge. Use methane as the gas, and then light the exhaust, and use the flame jets. IDK how, but use them.
$endgroup$
– Neal
10 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Neal simple: what's better than a chainsaw at maiming your enemy? The MurderCo Rocket-Propelled Chainsaw (patents pending)! Why use measly human (or whatever other species) appendages to thrust your chainsaw into your enemy when our patented diverters use the combustion exhaust to launch it at your enemy? Warning, adult supervision required, MurderCo is not responsible for loss of limbs or life, property damage, or damages caused by Acts of Stupid (which includes all actions taken using the MurderCo RPC).
$endgroup$
– Doktor J
9 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I would go for a pneumatic solution. It can support easily a 40 pound high pressure container storing sufficient energy for 15 seconds.
New contributor
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Also consider the giant farting sound on, ahem, discharge. Use methane as the gas, and then light the exhaust, and use the flame jets. IDK how, but use them.
$endgroup$
– Neal
10 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Neal simple: what's better than a chainsaw at maiming your enemy? The MurderCo Rocket-Propelled Chainsaw (patents pending)! Why use measly human (or whatever other species) appendages to thrust your chainsaw into your enemy when our patented diverters use the combustion exhaust to launch it at your enemy? Warning, adult supervision required, MurderCo is not responsible for loss of limbs or life, property damage, or damages caused by Acts of Stupid (which includes all actions taken using the MurderCo RPC).
$endgroup$
– Doktor J
9 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I would go for a pneumatic solution. It can support easily a 40 pound high pressure container storing sufficient energy for 15 seconds.
New contributor
$endgroup$
I would go for a pneumatic solution. It can support easily a 40 pound high pressure container storing sufficient energy for 15 seconds.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 18 hours ago
user9user9
1112
1112
New contributor
New contributor
1
$begingroup$
Also consider the giant farting sound on, ahem, discharge. Use methane as the gas, and then light the exhaust, and use the flame jets. IDK how, but use them.
$endgroup$
– Neal
10 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Neal simple: what's better than a chainsaw at maiming your enemy? The MurderCo Rocket-Propelled Chainsaw (patents pending)! Why use measly human (or whatever other species) appendages to thrust your chainsaw into your enemy when our patented diverters use the combustion exhaust to launch it at your enemy? Warning, adult supervision required, MurderCo is not responsible for loss of limbs or life, property damage, or damages caused by Acts of Stupid (which includes all actions taken using the MurderCo RPC).
$endgroup$
– Doktor J
9 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Also consider the giant farting sound on, ahem, discharge. Use methane as the gas, and then light the exhaust, and use the flame jets. IDK how, but use them.
$endgroup$
– Neal
10 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Neal simple: what's better than a chainsaw at maiming your enemy? The MurderCo Rocket-Propelled Chainsaw (patents pending)! Why use measly human (or whatever other species) appendages to thrust your chainsaw into your enemy when our patented diverters use the combustion exhaust to launch it at your enemy? Warning, adult supervision required, MurderCo is not responsible for loss of limbs or life, property damage, or damages caused by Acts of Stupid (which includes all actions taken using the MurderCo RPC).
$endgroup$
– Doktor J
9 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Also consider the giant farting sound on, ahem, discharge. Use methane as the gas, and then light the exhaust, and use the flame jets. IDK how, but use them.
$endgroup$
– Neal
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
Also consider the giant farting sound on, ahem, discharge. Use methane as the gas, and then light the exhaust, and use the flame jets. IDK how, but use them.
$endgroup$
– Neal
10 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@Neal simple: what's better than a chainsaw at maiming your enemy? The MurderCo Rocket-Propelled Chainsaw (patents pending)! Why use measly human (or whatever other species) appendages to thrust your chainsaw into your enemy when our patented diverters use the combustion exhaust to launch it at your enemy? Warning, adult supervision required, MurderCo is not responsible for loss of limbs or life, property damage, or damages caused by Acts of Stupid (which includes all actions taken using the MurderCo RPC).
$endgroup$
– Doktor J
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Neal simple: what's better than a chainsaw at maiming your enemy? The MurderCo Rocket-Propelled Chainsaw (patents pending)! Why use measly human (or whatever other species) appendages to thrust your chainsaw into your enemy when our patented diverters use the combustion exhaust to launch it at your enemy? Warning, adult supervision required, MurderCo is not responsible for loss of limbs or life, property damage, or damages caused by Acts of Stupid (which includes all actions taken using the MurderCo RPC).
$endgroup$
– Doktor J
9 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Well if you only need it very briefly I'd recommend a power cell.
Where batteries provide a slow trickle of stored energy over time,power cells can dump all of their energy in an instant. So that chainsaw purpose built to be disposable but very deadly could literally be torn apart from the energy it exerts in its short period of activity.
Also this means that being disposable the chainsaw would be made of cheaper materials. Since the power cell never needs to be replaced as it is a one-off use it can be made non-rechargeable and self-destructing. Not in the way it blows up when used, but it burns out the internal storage from the incredible heat and shock of the energy release.
All in all, the chainsaws shall exist. And they shall be terrifying. Maybe just make the edge out of carbon nano-tubes? Nano-tubes can also be used to store energy within their mass much like batteries or power cells. So you could literally make the chainsaw one giant power cell made of an extremely energy dense but light material that at 400 lbs would have enough power to immolate an elephant entirely most likely.
Your chainsaw would have the power of a bomb, all put towards a few glorious seconds to a minute at most of incredibly destructive power as the blade super heats and the chainsaw loses cohesion as the power which simultaneously kept it together suddenly runs out.
I hope this helps.
$endgroup$
4
$begingroup$
Aren't batteries and power cells the same thing? A battery is a group of several cells linked together. If you cut open something like an AA battery, you will find button cells inside of it. Even car batteries are made up of several different cells.
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
19 hours ago
$begingroup$
@LiamMorris In fact, it may even be the opposite: each power gives you some power, so you want as many as possible to have the highest possible power (but for the shortest time)
$endgroup$
– Eth
19 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
Maybe use super capacitors. They can deliver huge amount of power in short time.
$endgroup$
– jnovacho
18 hours ago
$begingroup$
@jnovacho Good idea. I will write an answer based on this.
$endgroup$
– Philipp
18 hours ago
$begingroup$
What's this power cell you are talking about?
$endgroup$
– jpa
15 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Well if you only need it very briefly I'd recommend a power cell.
Where batteries provide a slow trickle of stored energy over time,power cells can dump all of their energy in an instant. So that chainsaw purpose built to be disposable but very deadly could literally be torn apart from the energy it exerts in its short period of activity.
Also this means that being disposable the chainsaw would be made of cheaper materials. Since the power cell never needs to be replaced as it is a one-off use it can be made non-rechargeable and self-destructing. Not in the way it blows up when used, but it burns out the internal storage from the incredible heat and shock of the energy release.
All in all, the chainsaws shall exist. And they shall be terrifying. Maybe just make the edge out of carbon nano-tubes? Nano-tubes can also be used to store energy within their mass much like batteries or power cells. So you could literally make the chainsaw one giant power cell made of an extremely energy dense but light material that at 400 lbs would have enough power to immolate an elephant entirely most likely.
Your chainsaw would have the power of a bomb, all put towards a few glorious seconds to a minute at most of incredibly destructive power as the blade super heats and the chainsaw loses cohesion as the power which simultaneously kept it together suddenly runs out.
I hope this helps.
$endgroup$
4
$begingroup$
Aren't batteries and power cells the same thing? A battery is a group of several cells linked together. If you cut open something like an AA battery, you will find button cells inside of it. Even car batteries are made up of several different cells.
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
19 hours ago
$begingroup$
@LiamMorris In fact, it may even be the opposite: each power gives you some power, so you want as many as possible to have the highest possible power (but for the shortest time)
$endgroup$
– Eth
19 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
Maybe use super capacitors. They can deliver huge amount of power in short time.
$endgroup$
– jnovacho
18 hours ago
$begingroup$
@jnovacho Good idea. I will write an answer based on this.
$endgroup$
– Philipp
18 hours ago
$begingroup$
What's this power cell you are talking about?
$endgroup$
– jpa
15 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Well if you only need it very briefly I'd recommend a power cell.
Where batteries provide a slow trickle of stored energy over time,power cells can dump all of their energy in an instant. So that chainsaw purpose built to be disposable but very deadly could literally be torn apart from the energy it exerts in its short period of activity.
Also this means that being disposable the chainsaw would be made of cheaper materials. Since the power cell never needs to be replaced as it is a one-off use it can be made non-rechargeable and self-destructing. Not in the way it blows up when used, but it burns out the internal storage from the incredible heat and shock of the energy release.
All in all, the chainsaws shall exist. And they shall be terrifying. Maybe just make the edge out of carbon nano-tubes? Nano-tubes can also be used to store energy within their mass much like batteries or power cells. So you could literally make the chainsaw one giant power cell made of an extremely energy dense but light material that at 400 lbs would have enough power to immolate an elephant entirely most likely.
Your chainsaw would have the power of a bomb, all put towards a few glorious seconds to a minute at most of incredibly destructive power as the blade super heats and the chainsaw loses cohesion as the power which simultaneously kept it together suddenly runs out.
I hope this helps.
$endgroup$
Well if you only need it very briefly I'd recommend a power cell.
Where batteries provide a slow trickle of stored energy over time,power cells can dump all of their energy in an instant. So that chainsaw purpose built to be disposable but very deadly could literally be torn apart from the energy it exerts in its short period of activity.
Also this means that being disposable the chainsaw would be made of cheaper materials. Since the power cell never needs to be replaced as it is a one-off use it can be made non-rechargeable and self-destructing. Not in the way it blows up when used, but it burns out the internal storage from the incredible heat and shock of the energy release.
All in all, the chainsaws shall exist. And they shall be terrifying. Maybe just make the edge out of carbon nano-tubes? Nano-tubes can also be used to store energy within their mass much like batteries or power cells. So you could literally make the chainsaw one giant power cell made of an extremely energy dense but light material that at 400 lbs would have enough power to immolate an elephant entirely most likely.
Your chainsaw would have the power of a bomb, all put towards a few glorious seconds to a minute at most of incredibly destructive power as the blade super heats and the chainsaw loses cohesion as the power which simultaneously kept it together suddenly runs out.
I hope this helps.
edited 19 hours ago
Separatrix
85.5k31198332
85.5k31198332
answered 20 hours ago
Jeremy BarrettJeremy Barrett
629115
629115
4
$begingroup$
Aren't batteries and power cells the same thing? A battery is a group of several cells linked together. If you cut open something like an AA battery, you will find button cells inside of it. Even car batteries are made up of several different cells.
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
19 hours ago
$begingroup$
@LiamMorris In fact, it may even be the opposite: each power gives you some power, so you want as many as possible to have the highest possible power (but for the shortest time)
$endgroup$
– Eth
19 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
Maybe use super capacitors. They can deliver huge amount of power in short time.
$endgroup$
– jnovacho
18 hours ago
$begingroup$
@jnovacho Good idea. I will write an answer based on this.
$endgroup$
– Philipp
18 hours ago
$begingroup$
What's this power cell you are talking about?
$endgroup$
– jpa
15 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
4
$begingroup$
Aren't batteries and power cells the same thing? A battery is a group of several cells linked together. If you cut open something like an AA battery, you will find button cells inside of it. Even car batteries are made up of several different cells.
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
19 hours ago
$begingroup$
@LiamMorris In fact, it may even be the opposite: each power gives you some power, so you want as many as possible to have the highest possible power (but for the shortest time)
$endgroup$
– Eth
19 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
Maybe use super capacitors. They can deliver huge amount of power in short time.
$endgroup$
– jnovacho
18 hours ago
$begingroup$
@jnovacho Good idea. I will write an answer based on this.
$endgroup$
– Philipp
18 hours ago
$begingroup$
What's this power cell you are talking about?
$endgroup$
– jpa
15 hours ago
4
4
$begingroup$
Aren't batteries and power cells the same thing? A battery is a group of several cells linked together. If you cut open something like an AA battery, you will find button cells inside of it. Even car batteries are made up of several different cells.
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
19 hours ago
$begingroup$
Aren't batteries and power cells the same thing? A battery is a group of several cells linked together. If you cut open something like an AA battery, you will find button cells inside of it. Even car batteries are made up of several different cells.
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
19 hours ago
$begingroup$
@LiamMorris In fact, it may even be the opposite: each power gives you some power, so you want as many as possible to have the highest possible power (but for the shortest time)
$endgroup$
– Eth
19 hours ago
$begingroup$
@LiamMorris In fact, it may even be the opposite: each power gives you some power, so you want as many as possible to have the highest possible power (but for the shortest time)
$endgroup$
– Eth
19 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
Maybe use super capacitors. They can deliver huge amount of power in short time.
$endgroup$
– jnovacho
18 hours ago
$begingroup$
Maybe use super capacitors. They can deliver huge amount of power in short time.
$endgroup$
– jnovacho
18 hours ago
$begingroup$
@jnovacho Good idea. I will write an answer based on this.
$endgroup$
– Philipp
18 hours ago
$begingroup$
@jnovacho Good idea. I will write an answer based on this.
$endgroup$
– Philipp
18 hours ago
$begingroup$
What's this power cell you are talking about?
$endgroup$
– jpa
15 hours ago
$begingroup$
What's this power cell you are talking about?
$endgroup$
– jpa
15 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
As an alternative to coiled spring you can have your own gyro core (or flywheel).
Make a small and dense wheel to rotate very fast on pins in your chainsaw, virtually without energy loss, and then give it all away to chain blades. After it is discharged it becomes a useless piece of metal without any electronics or stuff. It is also much safer to operate than coiled spring.
If anything it will also stabilize delivery of this chainsaw.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Trying to manoeuvre such a weapon would be nigh on impossible if you used it to store any appreciable energy, surely?
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
You could put your gyro core into gyro stabilizer, which will let you handle such weapon. Or maybe it's not even necessary given the question details.
$endgroup$
– alamar
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Probably storing the spun up weapons in opposite-spun pairs always would compensate some unwanted effect AND stabilize your aircraft?
$endgroup$
– rackandboneman
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Just use counter-rotating gyros.
$endgroup$
– RBarryYoung
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As an alternative to coiled spring you can have your own gyro core (or flywheel).
Make a small and dense wheel to rotate very fast on pins in your chainsaw, virtually without energy loss, and then give it all away to chain blades. After it is discharged it becomes a useless piece of metal without any electronics or stuff. It is also much safer to operate than coiled spring.
If anything it will also stabilize delivery of this chainsaw.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Trying to manoeuvre such a weapon would be nigh on impossible if you used it to store any appreciable energy, surely?
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
You could put your gyro core into gyro stabilizer, which will let you handle such weapon. Or maybe it's not even necessary given the question details.
$endgroup$
– alamar
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Probably storing the spun up weapons in opposite-spun pairs always would compensate some unwanted effect AND stabilize your aircraft?
$endgroup$
– rackandboneman
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Just use counter-rotating gyros.
$endgroup$
– RBarryYoung
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As an alternative to coiled spring you can have your own gyro core (or flywheel).
Make a small and dense wheel to rotate very fast on pins in your chainsaw, virtually without energy loss, and then give it all away to chain blades. After it is discharged it becomes a useless piece of metal without any electronics or stuff. It is also much safer to operate than coiled spring.
If anything it will also stabilize delivery of this chainsaw.
$endgroup$
As an alternative to coiled spring you can have your own gyro core (or flywheel).
Make a small and dense wheel to rotate very fast on pins in your chainsaw, virtually without energy loss, and then give it all away to chain blades. After it is discharged it becomes a useless piece of metal without any electronics or stuff. It is also much safer to operate than coiled spring.
If anything it will also stabilize delivery of this chainsaw.
answered 17 hours ago
alamaralamar
1,578315
1,578315
$begingroup$
Trying to manoeuvre such a weapon would be nigh on impossible if you used it to store any appreciable energy, surely?
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
You could put your gyro core into gyro stabilizer, which will let you handle such weapon. Or maybe it's not even necessary given the question details.
$endgroup$
– alamar
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Probably storing the spun up weapons in opposite-spun pairs always would compensate some unwanted effect AND stabilize your aircraft?
$endgroup$
– rackandboneman
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Just use counter-rotating gyros.
$endgroup$
– RBarryYoung
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Trying to manoeuvre such a weapon would be nigh on impossible if you used it to store any appreciable energy, surely?
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
You could put your gyro core into gyro stabilizer, which will let you handle such weapon. Or maybe it's not even necessary given the question details.
$endgroup$
– alamar
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Probably storing the spun up weapons in opposite-spun pairs always would compensate some unwanted effect AND stabilize your aircraft?
$endgroup$
– rackandboneman
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Just use counter-rotating gyros.
$endgroup$
– RBarryYoung
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Trying to manoeuvre such a weapon would be nigh on impossible if you used it to store any appreciable energy, surely?
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
Trying to manoeuvre such a weapon would be nigh on impossible if you used it to store any appreciable energy, surely?
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
You could put your gyro core into gyro stabilizer, which will let you handle such weapon. Or maybe it's not even necessary given the question details.
$endgroup$
– alamar
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
You could put your gyro core into gyro stabilizer, which will let you handle such weapon. Or maybe it's not even necessary given the question details.
$endgroup$
– alamar
13 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Probably storing the spun up weapons in opposite-spun pairs always would compensate some unwanted effect AND stabilize your aircraft?
$endgroup$
– rackandboneman
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Probably storing the spun up weapons in opposite-spun pairs always would compensate some unwanted effect AND stabilize your aircraft?
$endgroup$
– rackandboneman
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Just use counter-rotating gyros.
$endgroup$
– RBarryYoung
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Just use counter-rotating gyros.
$endgroup$
– RBarryYoung
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Well possibly the easiest power source to use would be a battery, you can accurately determine how much ‘life’ it could give to a piece of electronics by setting the max capacity and charging it until it is full.
Although, if your problem is just that you need to get the chainsaws down safely, i would recommend using parachutes or heavily padded drop boxes to ensure the contents were undamaged. At that point you could use whatever fuel you liked as it would not be damaged from the fall.
However, i don’t think you’d want to use chainsaws, especially ones that heavy, as weapons. They are not particularly effective, are slow and 400 pounds is about the weight of two humans. At that point you might as well be using a giant maul instead. Here is an answer where i explained the issues with chainsaw weapons. There is also a link to a youtube video in my answer which demonstrates my point.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
But chainsaws are FUN . Signed, Anonymous From Texas
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
17 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Well possibly the easiest power source to use would be a battery, you can accurately determine how much ‘life’ it could give to a piece of electronics by setting the max capacity and charging it until it is full.
Although, if your problem is just that you need to get the chainsaws down safely, i would recommend using parachutes or heavily padded drop boxes to ensure the contents were undamaged. At that point you could use whatever fuel you liked as it would not be damaged from the fall.
However, i don’t think you’d want to use chainsaws, especially ones that heavy, as weapons. They are not particularly effective, are slow and 400 pounds is about the weight of two humans. At that point you might as well be using a giant maul instead. Here is an answer where i explained the issues with chainsaw weapons. There is also a link to a youtube video in my answer which demonstrates my point.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
But chainsaws are FUN . Signed, Anonymous From Texas
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
17 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Well possibly the easiest power source to use would be a battery, you can accurately determine how much ‘life’ it could give to a piece of electronics by setting the max capacity and charging it until it is full.
Although, if your problem is just that you need to get the chainsaws down safely, i would recommend using parachutes or heavily padded drop boxes to ensure the contents were undamaged. At that point you could use whatever fuel you liked as it would not be damaged from the fall.
However, i don’t think you’d want to use chainsaws, especially ones that heavy, as weapons. They are not particularly effective, are slow and 400 pounds is about the weight of two humans. At that point you might as well be using a giant maul instead. Here is an answer where i explained the issues with chainsaw weapons. There is also a link to a youtube video in my answer which demonstrates my point.
$endgroup$
Well possibly the easiest power source to use would be a battery, you can accurately determine how much ‘life’ it could give to a piece of electronics by setting the max capacity and charging it until it is full.
Although, if your problem is just that you need to get the chainsaws down safely, i would recommend using parachutes or heavily padded drop boxes to ensure the contents were undamaged. At that point you could use whatever fuel you liked as it would not be damaged from the fall.
However, i don’t think you’d want to use chainsaws, especially ones that heavy, as weapons. They are not particularly effective, are slow and 400 pounds is about the weight of two humans. At that point you might as well be using a giant maul instead. Here is an answer where i explained the issues with chainsaw weapons. There is also a link to a youtube video in my answer which demonstrates my point.
edited 19 hours ago
answered 20 hours ago
Liam MorrisLiam Morris
1,506323
1,506323
1
$begingroup$
But chainsaws are FUN . Signed, Anonymous From Texas
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
17 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
But chainsaws are FUN . Signed, Anonymous From Texas
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
17 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
But chainsaws are FUN . Signed, Anonymous From Texas
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
But chainsaws are FUN . Signed, Anonymous From Texas
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
17 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since this is the sort of weapon that Coyote would be using against Roadrunner, it must be powered by the future power supply du jour.
In the 1950s that would have meant nuclear power, nowadays everything is battery powered, though some consider that the future is in hydrogen.
It very much depends on the tone of the situation you're creating.
The clean and neat nature of modern hydrogen fuel cells and batteries may not fit the context, so you might want to find some way of making it spew smoke and fire as it's powered up, that means coal or at the least diesel powered.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since this is the sort of weapon that Coyote would be using against Roadrunner, it must be powered by the future power supply du jour.
In the 1950s that would have meant nuclear power, nowadays everything is battery powered, though some consider that the future is in hydrogen.
It very much depends on the tone of the situation you're creating.
The clean and neat nature of modern hydrogen fuel cells and batteries may not fit the context, so you might want to find some way of making it spew smoke and fire as it's powered up, that means coal or at the least diesel powered.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since this is the sort of weapon that Coyote would be using against Roadrunner, it must be powered by the future power supply du jour.
In the 1950s that would have meant nuclear power, nowadays everything is battery powered, though some consider that the future is in hydrogen.
It very much depends on the tone of the situation you're creating.
The clean and neat nature of modern hydrogen fuel cells and batteries may not fit the context, so you might want to find some way of making it spew smoke and fire as it's powered up, that means coal or at the least diesel powered.
$endgroup$
Since this is the sort of weapon that Coyote would be using against Roadrunner, it must be powered by the future power supply du jour.
In the 1950s that would have meant nuclear power, nowadays everything is battery powered, though some consider that the future is in hydrogen.
It very much depends on the tone of the situation you're creating.
The clean and neat nature of modern hydrogen fuel cells and batteries may not fit the context, so you might want to find some way of making it spew smoke and fire as it's powered up, that means coal or at the least diesel powered.
answered 19 hours ago
SeparatrixSeparatrix
85.5k31198332
85.5k31198332
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Expanding on Willk's answer here:
You have a "lander" and a chainsaw. The chainsaw is spring-powered. The lander has multiple rotors, say 3, that both break the fall and charge spring. It would basically look like a quadrocopter with a chainsaw at the bottom falling down.
A ratchet prevents the spring from discharging. A trigger mechanism in the chainsaw releases the ratchet and directs its power from the rotor coupling to the saw's chain - the chainsaw is running, purely from the energy from the fall.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Expanding on Willk's answer here:
You have a "lander" and a chainsaw. The chainsaw is spring-powered. The lander has multiple rotors, say 3, that both break the fall and charge spring. It would basically look like a quadrocopter with a chainsaw at the bottom falling down.
A ratchet prevents the spring from discharging. A trigger mechanism in the chainsaw releases the ratchet and directs its power from the rotor coupling to the saw's chain - the chainsaw is running, purely from the energy from the fall.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Expanding on Willk's answer here:
You have a "lander" and a chainsaw. The chainsaw is spring-powered. The lander has multiple rotors, say 3, that both break the fall and charge spring. It would basically look like a quadrocopter with a chainsaw at the bottom falling down.
A ratchet prevents the spring from discharging. A trigger mechanism in the chainsaw releases the ratchet and directs its power from the rotor coupling to the saw's chain - the chainsaw is running, purely from the energy from the fall.
$endgroup$
Expanding on Willk's answer here:
You have a "lander" and a chainsaw. The chainsaw is spring-powered. The lander has multiple rotors, say 3, that both break the fall and charge spring. It would basically look like a quadrocopter with a chainsaw at the bottom falling down.
A ratchet prevents the spring from discharging. A trigger mechanism in the chainsaw releases the ratchet and directs its power from the rotor coupling to the saw's chain - the chainsaw is running, purely from the energy from the fall.
answered 17 hours ago
InfrisiosInfrisios
1,11838
1,11838
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Googling "battery in missiles" led me to the page of a company manufacturing and selling such solutions.
I am guessing your solution would be "thermal battery". I do not think they are selling a solution just for you but the duration and power can be tailored to application. Also, such batteries are used by military using similar "mil-tech" would probably fit the back story.
Also such batteries are single use, durable, reliable and have long shelf life.
Some of the other battery chemistries they offer might work better for you, so you might want to check them out. They might be rechargeable though.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Googling "battery in missiles" led me to the page of a company manufacturing and selling such solutions.
I am guessing your solution would be "thermal battery". I do not think they are selling a solution just for you but the duration and power can be tailored to application. Also, such batteries are used by military using similar "mil-tech" would probably fit the back story.
Also such batteries are single use, durable, reliable and have long shelf life.
Some of the other battery chemistries they offer might work better for you, so you might want to check them out. They might be rechargeable though.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Googling "battery in missiles" led me to the page of a company manufacturing and selling such solutions.
I am guessing your solution would be "thermal battery". I do not think they are selling a solution just for you but the duration and power can be tailored to application. Also, such batteries are used by military using similar "mil-tech" would probably fit the back story.
Also such batteries are single use, durable, reliable and have long shelf life.
Some of the other battery chemistries they offer might work better for you, so you might want to check them out. They might be rechargeable though.
$endgroup$
Googling "battery in missiles" led me to the page of a company manufacturing and selling such solutions.
I am guessing your solution would be "thermal battery". I do not think they are selling a solution just for you but the duration and power can be tailored to application. Also, such batteries are used by military using similar "mil-tech" would probably fit the back story.
Also such batteries are single use, durable, reliable and have long shelf life.
Some of the other battery chemistries they offer might work better for you, so you might want to check them out. They might be rechargeable though.
answered 14 hours ago
Ville NiemiVille Niemi
35k260119
35k260119
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I would go for a chemistry based solution. Think of current engines; they are all based on the concept of explosions. Now think of a giant explosion happening on release of the chainsaw. It would create enough pressure to power the chainsaw for quite some time.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I would go for a chemistry based solution. Think of current engines; they are all based on the concept of explosions. Now think of a giant explosion happening on release of the chainsaw. It would create enough pressure to power the chainsaw for quite some time.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I would go for a chemistry based solution. Think of current engines; they are all based on the concept of explosions. Now think of a giant explosion happening on release of the chainsaw. It would create enough pressure to power the chainsaw for quite some time.
$endgroup$
I would go for a chemistry based solution. Think of current engines; they are all based on the concept of explosions. Now think of a giant explosion happening on release of the chainsaw. It would create enough pressure to power the chainsaw for quite some time.
answered 10 hours ago
LMDLMD
3145
3145
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Launching from a plane, that chainsaw is going to waste a lot of nice gravitational energy, which could be used for much more interesting tasks, such as providing motion to the chainsaw itself.
So, the chainsaw itself is tethered to the plane with a very long roller chain, which is connected to a pinion inside the chainsaw (think of a Beyblade launcher).
When launched from the plane, the chainsaw falls, so that the roller chain makes the pinion start rotating. The pinion will then transmit the motion to the chainsaw, so that it will rotate at full speed when touching ground!
Alternatively, a parachute could open and hold a reel with the roller chain tethered to the chainsaw, which is still falling relative to the parachute.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Launching from a plane, that chainsaw is going to waste a lot of nice gravitational energy, which could be used for much more interesting tasks, such as providing motion to the chainsaw itself.
So, the chainsaw itself is tethered to the plane with a very long roller chain, which is connected to a pinion inside the chainsaw (think of a Beyblade launcher).
When launched from the plane, the chainsaw falls, so that the roller chain makes the pinion start rotating. The pinion will then transmit the motion to the chainsaw, so that it will rotate at full speed when touching ground!
Alternatively, a parachute could open and hold a reel with the roller chain tethered to the chainsaw, which is still falling relative to the parachute.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Launching from a plane, that chainsaw is going to waste a lot of nice gravitational energy, which could be used for much more interesting tasks, such as providing motion to the chainsaw itself.
So, the chainsaw itself is tethered to the plane with a very long roller chain, which is connected to a pinion inside the chainsaw (think of a Beyblade launcher).
When launched from the plane, the chainsaw falls, so that the roller chain makes the pinion start rotating. The pinion will then transmit the motion to the chainsaw, so that it will rotate at full speed when touching ground!
Alternatively, a parachute could open and hold a reel with the roller chain tethered to the chainsaw, which is still falling relative to the parachute.
$endgroup$
Launching from a plane, that chainsaw is going to waste a lot of nice gravitational energy, which could be used for much more interesting tasks, such as providing motion to the chainsaw itself.
So, the chainsaw itself is tethered to the plane with a very long roller chain, which is connected to a pinion inside the chainsaw (think of a Beyblade launcher).
When launched from the plane, the chainsaw falls, so that the roller chain makes the pinion start rotating. The pinion will then transmit the motion to the chainsaw, so that it will rotate at full speed when touching ground!
Alternatively, a parachute could open and hold a reel with the roller chain tethered to the chainsaw, which is still falling relative to the parachute.
edited 10 hours ago
Emilio M Bumachar
4,5681122
4,5681122
answered 13 hours ago
McTroopersMcTroopers
1,0406
1,0406
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Dual liquid explosive, the force would trash the mechanism but its a one use weapon.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
These are normally called binary explosives, just for reference.
$endgroup$
– ltmauve
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Dual liquid explosive, the force would trash the mechanism but its a one use weapon.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
These are normally called binary explosives, just for reference.
$endgroup$
– ltmauve
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Dual liquid explosive, the force would trash the mechanism but its a one use weapon.
$endgroup$
Dual liquid explosive, the force would trash the mechanism but its a one use weapon.
answered 8 hours ago
ObakObak
515
515
$begingroup$
These are normally called binary explosives, just for reference.
$endgroup$
– ltmauve
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
These are normally called binary explosives, just for reference.
$endgroup$
– ltmauve
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
These are normally called binary explosives, just for reference.
$endgroup$
– ltmauve
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
These are normally called binary explosives, just for reference.
$endgroup$
– ltmauve
6 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143551%2fwhat-could-be-the-right-powersource-for-15-seconds-lifespan-disposable-giant-cha%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
6
$begingroup$
This whole concept seems unwise to me. 400lbs is crazy amount of weight to wield, which assume the chainsaw survives landing, and it lands near you. Range is way too close to have a problematic enemy for my comfort. Instead how about 100lbs or so of frag grenades or similar you can use from a safe distance. Range, damages, easy to use, and multiples can be deployed to same target easily.
$endgroup$
– cybernard
15 hours ago
8
$begingroup$
@cybernard The whole concept is batshit insane. It's obviously intended for a fictional universe driven by the rule of cool and not by rationality.
$endgroup$
– Philipp
15 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
@Philipp there is rule of cool and there's stuff that breaks the suspension of disbelief. I do believe that with chainsaw planes, any hope for realism goes right out the window... which doesn't necessarily make the resulting fiction bad, but it does make the need for defined inner workings quite a bit less necessary.
$endgroup$
– John Dvorak
14 hours ago
5
$begingroup$
In a universe where coolness trumps sanity when it comes to conflict, chainsaw planes make perfect sense. As do superhero landings (They’re hell on the knees), giant floating air fortresses and flashy uniforms with the underpants on the outside. Basically this is the kind of thing any superhero film could benefit from.
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
13 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
I initially read this as the jet dropping the chainsaw directly on the enemy, which is also awesome.
$endgroup$
– TKK
7 hours ago