What could be the right powersource for 15 seconds lifespan disposable giant chainsaw? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InWhich edge shape is better to cut things with for a chain sword type/style?If we had easier access to antimatter, how could we use it?Space weaponry?Can one Battlestar conquer Earth?Could the principle of the zero point energy universe be used for infinite energy?Sci-fi Science: Physics of Impossibru: “Force fields”In a SciFi world, how could a “suit” cary 1000X+ times the wearer's weight/volume?Feasibility of a village improving its economy through hot springsThe time it takes to advance a medieval period country to a spacefaring intergalactic countryWhat (modern) weapons could be used to destroy skeletal enemies as completely as possible?What would be the ideal way to weaponize plasma?

How to change the limits of integration

What is the meaning of Triage in Cybersec world?

Could JWST stay at L2 "forever"?

How to manage monthly salary

Should I write numbers in words or as numerals when there are multiple next to each other?

What is the best strategy for white in this position?

What is the steepest angle that a canal can be traversable without locks?

How do you say "canon" as in "official for a story universe"?

Deadlock Graph and Interpretation, solution to avoid

What is this 4-propeller plane?

Geography at the pixel level

Time travel alters history but people keep saying nothing's changed

Limit to 0 ambiguity

What can other administrators access on my machine?

In microwave frequencies, do you use a circulator when you need a (near) perfect diode?

Spanish for "widget"

What does "sndry explns" mean in one of the Hitchhiker's guide books?

How to answer pointed "are you quitting" questioning when I don't want them to suspect

The difference between dialogue marks

Access elements in std::string where positon of string is greater than its size

Potential by Assembling Charges

I looked up a future colleague on LinkedIn before I started a job. I told my colleague about it and he seemed surprised. Should I apologize?

Does it makes sense to buy a new cycle to learn riding?

Where does the "burst of radiance" from Holy Weapon originate?



What could be the right powersource for 15 seconds lifespan disposable giant chainsaw?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InWhich edge shape is better to cut things with for a chain sword type/style?If we had easier access to antimatter, how could we use it?Space weaponry?Can one Battlestar conquer Earth?Could the principle of the zero point energy universe be used for infinite energy?Sci-fi Science: Physics of Impossibru: “Force fields”In a SciFi world, how could a “suit” cary 1000X+ times the wearer's weight/volume?Feasibility of a village improving its economy through hot springsThe time it takes to advance a medieval period country to a spacefaring intergalactic countryWhat (modern) weapons could be used to destroy skeletal enemies as completely as possible?What would be the ideal way to weaponize plasma?










18












$begingroup$


Imagine when a jet fighter swoops in to drop a 400 pounds giant chainsaw to you just so that you can use it to grind down one problematic enemy into a pulp then discard it a foot away from you. What power source would suit such a weapon with only 1 instant use before breaking itself apart?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 6




    $begingroup$
    This whole concept seems unwise to me. 400lbs is crazy amount of weight to wield, which assume the chainsaw survives landing, and it lands near you. Range is way too close to have a problematic enemy for my comfort. Instead how about 100lbs or so of frag grenades or similar you can use from a safe distance. Range, damages, easy to use, and multiples can be deployed to same target easily.
    $endgroup$
    – cybernard
    15 hours ago






  • 8




    $begingroup$
    @cybernard The whole concept is batshit insane. It's obviously intended for a fictional universe driven by the rule of cool and not by rationality.
    $endgroup$
    – Philipp
    15 hours ago







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @Philipp there is rule of cool and there's stuff that breaks the suspension of disbelief. I do believe that with chainsaw planes, any hope for realism goes right out the window... which doesn't necessarily make the resulting fiction bad, but it does make the need for defined inner workings quite a bit less necessary.
    $endgroup$
    – John Dvorak
    14 hours ago






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    In a universe where coolness trumps sanity when it comes to conflict, chainsaw planes make perfect sense. As do superhero landings (They’re hell on the knees), giant floating air fortresses and flashy uniforms with the underpants on the outside. Basically this is the kind of thing any superhero film could benefit from.
    $endgroup$
    – Joe Bloggs
    13 hours ago






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    I initially read this as the jet dropping the chainsaw directly on the enemy, which is also awesome.
    $endgroup$
    – TKK
    7 hours ago















18












$begingroup$


Imagine when a jet fighter swoops in to drop a 400 pounds giant chainsaw to you just so that you can use it to grind down one problematic enemy into a pulp then discard it a foot away from you. What power source would suit such a weapon with only 1 instant use before breaking itself apart?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 6




    $begingroup$
    This whole concept seems unwise to me. 400lbs is crazy amount of weight to wield, which assume the chainsaw survives landing, and it lands near you. Range is way too close to have a problematic enemy for my comfort. Instead how about 100lbs or so of frag grenades or similar you can use from a safe distance. Range, damages, easy to use, and multiples can be deployed to same target easily.
    $endgroup$
    – cybernard
    15 hours ago






  • 8




    $begingroup$
    @cybernard The whole concept is batshit insane. It's obviously intended for a fictional universe driven by the rule of cool and not by rationality.
    $endgroup$
    – Philipp
    15 hours ago







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @Philipp there is rule of cool and there's stuff that breaks the suspension of disbelief. I do believe that with chainsaw planes, any hope for realism goes right out the window... which doesn't necessarily make the resulting fiction bad, but it does make the need for defined inner workings quite a bit less necessary.
    $endgroup$
    – John Dvorak
    14 hours ago






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    In a universe where coolness trumps sanity when it comes to conflict, chainsaw planes make perfect sense. As do superhero landings (They’re hell on the knees), giant floating air fortresses and flashy uniforms with the underpants on the outside. Basically this is the kind of thing any superhero film could benefit from.
    $endgroup$
    – Joe Bloggs
    13 hours ago






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    I initially read this as the jet dropping the chainsaw directly on the enemy, which is also awesome.
    $endgroup$
    – TKK
    7 hours ago













18












18








18


3



$begingroup$


Imagine when a jet fighter swoops in to drop a 400 pounds giant chainsaw to you just so that you can use it to grind down one problematic enemy into a pulp then discard it a foot away from you. What power source would suit such a weapon with only 1 instant use before breaking itself apart?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




Imagine when a jet fighter swoops in to drop a 400 pounds giant chainsaw to you just so that you can use it to grind down one problematic enemy into a pulp then discard it a foot away from you. What power source would suit such a weapon with only 1 instant use before breaking itself apart?







reality-check technology science-fiction energy






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 15 hours ago









Cyn

11.2k12453




11.2k12453










asked 20 hours ago









67ironwhale67ironwhale

10115




10115







  • 6




    $begingroup$
    This whole concept seems unwise to me. 400lbs is crazy amount of weight to wield, which assume the chainsaw survives landing, and it lands near you. Range is way too close to have a problematic enemy for my comfort. Instead how about 100lbs or so of frag grenades or similar you can use from a safe distance. Range, damages, easy to use, and multiples can be deployed to same target easily.
    $endgroup$
    – cybernard
    15 hours ago






  • 8




    $begingroup$
    @cybernard The whole concept is batshit insane. It's obviously intended for a fictional universe driven by the rule of cool and not by rationality.
    $endgroup$
    – Philipp
    15 hours ago







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @Philipp there is rule of cool and there's stuff that breaks the suspension of disbelief. I do believe that with chainsaw planes, any hope for realism goes right out the window... which doesn't necessarily make the resulting fiction bad, but it does make the need for defined inner workings quite a bit less necessary.
    $endgroup$
    – John Dvorak
    14 hours ago






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    In a universe where coolness trumps sanity when it comes to conflict, chainsaw planes make perfect sense. As do superhero landings (They’re hell on the knees), giant floating air fortresses and flashy uniforms with the underpants on the outside. Basically this is the kind of thing any superhero film could benefit from.
    $endgroup$
    – Joe Bloggs
    13 hours ago






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    I initially read this as the jet dropping the chainsaw directly on the enemy, which is also awesome.
    $endgroup$
    – TKK
    7 hours ago












  • 6




    $begingroup$
    This whole concept seems unwise to me. 400lbs is crazy amount of weight to wield, which assume the chainsaw survives landing, and it lands near you. Range is way too close to have a problematic enemy for my comfort. Instead how about 100lbs or so of frag grenades or similar you can use from a safe distance. Range, damages, easy to use, and multiples can be deployed to same target easily.
    $endgroup$
    – cybernard
    15 hours ago






  • 8




    $begingroup$
    @cybernard The whole concept is batshit insane. It's obviously intended for a fictional universe driven by the rule of cool and not by rationality.
    $endgroup$
    – Philipp
    15 hours ago







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @Philipp there is rule of cool and there's stuff that breaks the suspension of disbelief. I do believe that with chainsaw planes, any hope for realism goes right out the window... which doesn't necessarily make the resulting fiction bad, but it does make the need for defined inner workings quite a bit less necessary.
    $endgroup$
    – John Dvorak
    14 hours ago






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    In a universe where coolness trumps sanity when it comes to conflict, chainsaw planes make perfect sense. As do superhero landings (They’re hell on the knees), giant floating air fortresses and flashy uniforms with the underpants on the outside. Basically this is the kind of thing any superhero film could benefit from.
    $endgroup$
    – Joe Bloggs
    13 hours ago






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    I initially read this as the jet dropping the chainsaw directly on the enemy, which is also awesome.
    $endgroup$
    – TKK
    7 hours ago







6




6




$begingroup$
This whole concept seems unwise to me. 400lbs is crazy amount of weight to wield, which assume the chainsaw survives landing, and it lands near you. Range is way too close to have a problematic enemy for my comfort. Instead how about 100lbs or so of frag grenades or similar you can use from a safe distance. Range, damages, easy to use, and multiples can be deployed to same target easily.
$endgroup$
– cybernard
15 hours ago




$begingroup$
This whole concept seems unwise to me. 400lbs is crazy amount of weight to wield, which assume the chainsaw survives landing, and it lands near you. Range is way too close to have a problematic enemy for my comfort. Instead how about 100lbs or so of frag grenades or similar you can use from a safe distance. Range, damages, easy to use, and multiples can be deployed to same target easily.
$endgroup$
– cybernard
15 hours ago




8




8




$begingroup$
@cybernard The whole concept is batshit insane. It's obviously intended for a fictional universe driven by the rule of cool and not by rationality.
$endgroup$
– Philipp
15 hours ago





$begingroup$
@cybernard The whole concept is batshit insane. It's obviously intended for a fictional universe driven by the rule of cool and not by rationality.
$endgroup$
– Philipp
15 hours ago





4




4




$begingroup$
@Philipp there is rule of cool and there's stuff that breaks the suspension of disbelief. I do believe that with chainsaw planes, any hope for realism goes right out the window... which doesn't necessarily make the resulting fiction bad, but it does make the need for defined inner workings quite a bit less necessary.
$endgroup$
– John Dvorak
14 hours ago




$begingroup$
@Philipp there is rule of cool and there's stuff that breaks the suspension of disbelief. I do believe that with chainsaw planes, any hope for realism goes right out the window... which doesn't necessarily make the resulting fiction bad, but it does make the need for defined inner workings quite a bit less necessary.
$endgroup$
– John Dvorak
14 hours ago




5




5




$begingroup$
In a universe where coolness trumps sanity when it comes to conflict, chainsaw planes make perfect sense. As do superhero landings (They’re hell on the knees), giant floating air fortresses and flashy uniforms with the underpants on the outside. Basically this is the kind of thing any superhero film could benefit from.
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
13 hours ago




$begingroup$
In a universe where coolness trumps sanity when it comes to conflict, chainsaw planes make perfect sense. As do superhero landings (They’re hell on the knees), giant floating air fortresses and flashy uniforms with the underpants on the outside. Basically this is the kind of thing any superhero film could benefit from.
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
13 hours ago




4




4




$begingroup$
I initially read this as the jet dropping the chainsaw directly on the enemy, which is also awesome.
$endgroup$
– TKK
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
I initially read this as the jet dropping the chainsaw directly on the enemy, which is also awesome.
$endgroup$
– TKK
7 hours ago










13 Answers
13






active

oldest

votes


















66












$begingroup$

Giant coiled spring.



It would uncoil itself and drive the chain. It would provide loads of power on demand. Storing that kind of energy as a coiled spring is dangerous, but I see that as a positive thing for your scenario.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 5




    $begingroup$
    +1 for being rechargeable
    $endgroup$
    – Trevor D
    17 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I'd go with this. See also Bacigalupi's WIndup Girl series -- with genetically designed organic springs as energy sources.
    $endgroup$
    – Carl Witthoft
    17 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I like this. It's not very realistic, but it sure as heck is cool..
    $endgroup$
    – John Dvorak
    13 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @JohnDvorak Ah yes, the quest for a realistic power source for a single use jet-delivered chainsaw.
    $endgroup$
    – corsiKa
    5 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Spring tension can hold the drive train together as well. When the spring looses tension it could literally fall apart as the question suggests. If you've ever taken apart a tape measure and had a part slip out of your hands you'll get what I'm talking about.
    $endgroup$
    – JPhi1618
    2 hours ago


















20












$begingroup$

Capacitors. These are electric components which store an electric charge for a limited amount of time and can release it very rapidly. They are relatively cheap and easy to manufacture. They are also reusable, but that doesn't matter in this case.



Capacitors can be manufactured in many different ways depending on their desired characteristics. But in general they have a lower energy density than chemical power cells, but they can release their stored energy a lot faster.



Capacitors are usually not designed to hold a charge for longer than a couple hours, so the capacitors either need to be charged before the mission or during the mission from the fighter's internal power supply.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    "... usually not designed to hold a charge..." ?? Depends drastically on the application. Whatever you do, never touch the flyback capacitor on a CRT without shorting it first. They hold significant voltage for years.
    $endgroup$
    – Carl Witthoft
    17 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @CarlWitthoft, years is a bit of an exaggeration. The self discharge rate of capacitors (as in no bleeder resistors) is still in the range of days. Supercapacitors have a lower self discharge rate but is still not remotely in the realm of years. Though, I'm always happy to be wrong, I did some quick checking but maybe I missed some edge case where that's true.
    $endgroup$
    – Jarrod Christman
    15 hours ago







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Capacitor 'hold time' depends on design and materials used. While they'll slowly leak it is well within the realm of possibility to design such a capacitor that could be charged on loading of the weapon and last for a 6-12 hour mission with useful load. Also keep in mind that 'discharged' doesn't always mean 'empty' - Very large caps can still hold enough to give you a solid kick years later, even if they're well below 'useful' levels that it was intended to be used at. In short: Don't lick caps.
    $endgroup$
    – TheLuckless
    15 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I updated the answer in light of the recent comments.
    $endgroup$
    – Philipp
    15 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @TheLuckless if it's possible for it to hold charge years later, why can't you make us of that to develop a capacitor that holds charge for years?
    $endgroup$
    – Nathan Hinchey
    2 hours ago


















12












$begingroup$

Pyrotechnics, in the form of twin spinning rockets rotating the saw axle. You have jet fighters, missiles would look like an obvious option. And as a bonus, a faulty device would explode throwing shrapnel into the enemy.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    11












    $begingroup$

    I would go for a pneumatic solution. It can support easily a 40 pound high pressure container storing sufficient energy for 15 seconds.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    user9 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Also consider the giant farting sound on, ahem, discharge. Use methane as the gas, and then light the exhaust, and use the flame jets. IDK how, but use them.
      $endgroup$
      – Neal
      10 hours ago







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @Neal simple: what's better than a chainsaw at maiming your enemy? The MurderCo Rocket-Propelled Chainsaw (patents pending)! Why use measly human (or whatever other species) appendages to thrust your chainsaw into your enemy when our patented diverters use the combustion exhaust to launch it at your enemy? Warning, adult supervision required, MurderCo is not responsible for loss of limbs or life, property damage, or damages caused by Acts of Stupid (which includes all actions taken using the MurderCo RPC).
      $endgroup$
      – Doktor J
      9 hours ago


















    6












    $begingroup$

    Well if you only need it very briefly I'd recommend a power cell.



    Where batteries provide a slow trickle of stored energy over time,power cells can dump all of their energy in an instant. So that chainsaw purpose built to be disposable but very deadly could literally be torn apart from the energy it exerts in its short period of activity.



    Also this means that being disposable the chainsaw would be made of cheaper materials. Since the power cell never needs to be replaced as it is a one-off use it can be made non-rechargeable and self-destructing. Not in the way it blows up when used, but it burns out the internal storage from the incredible heat and shock of the energy release.



    All in all, the chainsaws shall exist. And they shall be terrifying. Maybe just make the edge out of carbon nano-tubes? Nano-tubes can also be used to store energy within their mass much like batteries or power cells. So you could literally make the chainsaw one giant power cell made of an extremely energy dense but light material that at 400 lbs would have enough power to immolate an elephant entirely most likely.



    Your chainsaw would have the power of a bomb, all put towards a few glorious seconds to a minute at most of incredibly destructive power as the blade super heats and the chainsaw loses cohesion as the power which simultaneously kept it together suddenly runs out.



    I hope this helps.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$








    • 4




      $begingroup$
      Aren't batteries and power cells the same thing? A battery is a group of several cells linked together. If you cut open something like an AA battery, you will find button cells inside of it. Even car batteries are made up of several different cells.
      $endgroup$
      – Liam Morris
      19 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @LiamMorris In fact, it may even be the opposite: each power gives you some power, so you want as many as possible to have the highest possible power (but for the shortest time)
      $endgroup$
      – Eth
      19 hours ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Maybe use super capacitors. They can deliver huge amount of power in short time.
      $endgroup$
      – jnovacho
      18 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @jnovacho Good idea. I will write an answer based on this.
      $endgroup$
      – Philipp
      18 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      What's this power cell you are talking about?
      $endgroup$
      – jpa
      15 hours ago


















    6












    $begingroup$

    As an alternative to coiled spring you can have your own gyro core (or flywheel).



    Make a small and dense wheel to rotate very fast on pins in your chainsaw, virtually without energy loss, and then give it all away to chain blades. After it is discharged it becomes a useless piece of metal without any electronics or stuff. It is also much safer to operate than coiled spring.



    If anything it will also stabilize delivery of this chainsaw.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Trying to manoeuvre such a weapon would be nigh on impossible if you used it to store any appreciable energy, surely?
      $endgroup$
      – Joe Bloggs
      13 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      You could put your gyro core into gyro stabilizer, which will let you handle such weapon. Or maybe it's not even necessary given the question details.
      $endgroup$
      – alamar
      13 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Probably storing the spun up weapons in opposite-spun pairs always would compensate some unwanted effect AND stabilize your aircraft?
      $endgroup$
      – rackandboneman
      4 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Just use counter-rotating gyros.
      $endgroup$
      – RBarryYoung
      3 hours ago


















    2












    $begingroup$

    Well possibly the easiest power source to use would be a battery, you can accurately determine how much ‘life’ it could give to a piece of electronics by setting the max capacity and charging it until it is full.



    Although, if your problem is just that you need to get the chainsaws down safely, i would recommend using parachutes or heavily padded drop boxes to ensure the contents were undamaged. At that point you could use whatever fuel you liked as it would not be damaged from the fall.



    However, i don’t think you’d want to use chainsaws, especially ones that heavy, as weapons. They are not particularly effective, are slow and 400 pounds is about the weight of two humans. At that point you might as well be using a giant maul instead. Here is an answer where i explained the issues with chainsaw weapons. There is also a link to a youtube video in my answer which demonstrates my point.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      But chainsaws are FUN . Signed, Anonymous From Texas
      $endgroup$
      – Carl Witthoft
      17 hours ago


















    2












    $begingroup$

    Since this is the sort of weapon that Coyote would be using against Roadrunner, it must be powered by the future power supply du jour.



    In the 1950s that would have meant nuclear power, nowadays everything is battery powered, though some consider that the future is in hydrogen.



    It very much depends on the tone of the situation you're creating.



    The clean and neat nature of modern hydrogen fuel cells and batteries may not fit the context, so you might want to find some way of making it spew smoke and fire as it's powered up, that means coal or at the least diesel powered.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$




















      1












      $begingroup$

      Expanding on Willk's answer here:



      You have a "lander" and a chainsaw. The chainsaw is spring-powered. The lander has multiple rotors, say 3, that both break the fall and charge spring. It would basically look like a quadrocopter with a chainsaw at the bottom falling down.



      A ratchet prevents the spring from discharging. A trigger mechanism in the chainsaw releases the ratchet and directs its power from the rotor coupling to the saw's chain - the chainsaw is running, purely from the energy from the fall.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$




















        1












        $begingroup$

        Googling "battery in missiles" led me to the page of a company manufacturing and selling such solutions.



        I am guessing your solution would be "thermal battery". I do not think they are selling a solution just for you but the duration and power can be tailored to application. Also, such batteries are used by military using similar "mil-tech" would probably fit the back story.



        Also such batteries are single use, durable, reliable and have long shelf life.



        Some of the other battery chemistries they offer might work better for you, so you might want to check them out. They might be rechargeable though.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$




















          1












          $begingroup$

          I would go for a chemistry based solution. Think of current engines; they are all based on the concept of explosions. Now think of a giant explosion happening on release of the chainsaw. It would create enough pressure to power the chainsaw for quite some time.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$




















            1












            $begingroup$

            Launching from a plane, that chainsaw is going to waste a lot of nice gravitational energy, which could be used for much more interesting tasks, such as providing motion to the chainsaw itself.



            So, the chainsaw itself is tethered to the plane with a very long roller chain, which is connected to a pinion inside the chainsaw (think of a Beyblade launcher).

            When launched from the plane, the chainsaw falls, so that the roller chain makes the pinion start rotating. The pinion will then transmit the motion to the chainsaw, so that it will rotate at full speed when touching ground!



            Alternatively, a parachute could open and hold a reel with the roller chain tethered to the chainsaw, which is still falling relative to the parachute.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$




















              0












              $begingroup$

              Dual liquid explosive, the force would trash the mechanism but its a one use weapon.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$












              • $begingroup$
                These are normally called binary explosives, just for reference.
                $endgroup$
                – ltmauve
                6 hours ago











              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              );
              );
              , "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "579"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143551%2fwhat-could-be-the-right-powersource-for-15-seconds-lifespan-disposable-giant-cha%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              13 Answers
              13






              active

              oldest

              votes








              13 Answers
              13






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              66












              $begingroup$

              Giant coiled spring.



              It would uncoil itself and drive the chain. It would provide loads of power on demand. Storing that kind of energy as a coiled spring is dangerous, but I see that as a positive thing for your scenario.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$








              • 5




                $begingroup$
                +1 for being rechargeable
                $endgroup$
                – Trevor D
                17 hours ago






              • 2




                $begingroup$
                I'd go with this. See also Bacigalupi's WIndup Girl series -- with genetically designed organic springs as energy sources.
                $endgroup$
                – Carl Witthoft
                17 hours ago






              • 2




                $begingroup$
                I like this. It's not very realistic, but it sure as heck is cool..
                $endgroup$
                – John Dvorak
                13 hours ago






              • 3




                $begingroup$
                @JohnDvorak Ah yes, the quest for a realistic power source for a single use jet-delivered chainsaw.
                $endgroup$
                – corsiKa
                5 hours ago






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                Spring tension can hold the drive train together as well. When the spring looses tension it could literally fall apart as the question suggests. If you've ever taken apart a tape measure and had a part slip out of your hands you'll get what I'm talking about.
                $endgroup$
                – JPhi1618
                2 hours ago















              66












              $begingroup$

              Giant coiled spring.



              It would uncoil itself and drive the chain. It would provide loads of power on demand. Storing that kind of energy as a coiled spring is dangerous, but I see that as a positive thing for your scenario.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$








              • 5




                $begingroup$
                +1 for being rechargeable
                $endgroup$
                – Trevor D
                17 hours ago






              • 2




                $begingroup$
                I'd go with this. See also Bacigalupi's WIndup Girl series -- with genetically designed organic springs as energy sources.
                $endgroup$
                – Carl Witthoft
                17 hours ago






              • 2




                $begingroup$
                I like this. It's not very realistic, but it sure as heck is cool..
                $endgroup$
                – John Dvorak
                13 hours ago






              • 3




                $begingroup$
                @JohnDvorak Ah yes, the quest for a realistic power source for a single use jet-delivered chainsaw.
                $endgroup$
                – corsiKa
                5 hours ago






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                Spring tension can hold the drive train together as well. When the spring looses tension it could literally fall apart as the question suggests. If you've ever taken apart a tape measure and had a part slip out of your hands you'll get what I'm talking about.
                $endgroup$
                – JPhi1618
                2 hours ago













              66












              66








              66





              $begingroup$

              Giant coiled spring.



              It would uncoil itself and drive the chain. It would provide loads of power on demand. Storing that kind of energy as a coiled spring is dangerous, but I see that as a positive thing for your scenario.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$



              Giant coiled spring.



              It would uncoil itself and drive the chain. It would provide loads of power on demand. Storing that kind of energy as a coiled spring is dangerous, but I see that as a positive thing for your scenario.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered 19 hours ago









              WillkWillk

              117k27220488




              117k27220488







              • 5




                $begingroup$
                +1 for being rechargeable
                $endgroup$
                – Trevor D
                17 hours ago






              • 2




                $begingroup$
                I'd go with this. See also Bacigalupi's WIndup Girl series -- with genetically designed organic springs as energy sources.
                $endgroup$
                – Carl Witthoft
                17 hours ago






              • 2




                $begingroup$
                I like this. It's not very realistic, but it sure as heck is cool..
                $endgroup$
                – John Dvorak
                13 hours ago






              • 3




                $begingroup$
                @JohnDvorak Ah yes, the quest for a realistic power source for a single use jet-delivered chainsaw.
                $endgroup$
                – corsiKa
                5 hours ago






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                Spring tension can hold the drive train together as well. When the spring looses tension it could literally fall apart as the question suggests. If you've ever taken apart a tape measure and had a part slip out of your hands you'll get what I'm talking about.
                $endgroup$
                – JPhi1618
                2 hours ago












              • 5




                $begingroup$
                +1 for being rechargeable
                $endgroup$
                – Trevor D
                17 hours ago






              • 2




                $begingroup$
                I'd go with this. See also Bacigalupi's WIndup Girl series -- with genetically designed organic springs as energy sources.
                $endgroup$
                – Carl Witthoft
                17 hours ago






              • 2




                $begingroup$
                I like this. It's not very realistic, but it sure as heck is cool..
                $endgroup$
                – John Dvorak
                13 hours ago






              • 3




                $begingroup$
                @JohnDvorak Ah yes, the quest for a realistic power source for a single use jet-delivered chainsaw.
                $endgroup$
                – corsiKa
                5 hours ago






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                Spring tension can hold the drive train together as well. When the spring looses tension it could literally fall apart as the question suggests. If you've ever taken apart a tape measure and had a part slip out of your hands you'll get what I'm talking about.
                $endgroup$
                – JPhi1618
                2 hours ago







              5




              5




              $begingroup$
              +1 for being rechargeable
              $endgroup$
              – Trevor D
              17 hours ago




              $begingroup$
              +1 for being rechargeable
              $endgroup$
              – Trevor D
              17 hours ago




              2




              2




              $begingroup$
              I'd go with this. See also Bacigalupi's WIndup Girl series -- with genetically designed organic springs as energy sources.
              $endgroup$
              – Carl Witthoft
              17 hours ago




              $begingroup$
              I'd go with this. See also Bacigalupi's WIndup Girl series -- with genetically designed organic springs as energy sources.
              $endgroup$
              – Carl Witthoft
              17 hours ago




              2




              2




              $begingroup$
              I like this. It's not very realistic, but it sure as heck is cool..
              $endgroup$
              – John Dvorak
              13 hours ago




              $begingroup$
              I like this. It's not very realistic, but it sure as heck is cool..
              $endgroup$
              – John Dvorak
              13 hours ago




              3




              3




              $begingroup$
              @JohnDvorak Ah yes, the quest for a realistic power source for a single use jet-delivered chainsaw.
              $endgroup$
              – corsiKa
              5 hours ago




              $begingroup$
              @JohnDvorak Ah yes, the quest for a realistic power source for a single use jet-delivered chainsaw.
              $endgroup$
              – corsiKa
              5 hours ago




              1




              1




              $begingroup$
              Spring tension can hold the drive train together as well. When the spring looses tension it could literally fall apart as the question suggests. If you've ever taken apart a tape measure and had a part slip out of your hands you'll get what I'm talking about.
              $endgroup$
              – JPhi1618
              2 hours ago




              $begingroup$
              Spring tension can hold the drive train together as well. When the spring looses tension it could literally fall apart as the question suggests. If you've ever taken apart a tape measure and had a part slip out of your hands you'll get what I'm talking about.
              $endgroup$
              – JPhi1618
              2 hours ago











              20












              $begingroup$

              Capacitors. These are electric components which store an electric charge for a limited amount of time and can release it very rapidly. They are relatively cheap and easy to manufacture. They are also reusable, but that doesn't matter in this case.



              Capacitors can be manufactured in many different ways depending on their desired characteristics. But in general they have a lower energy density than chemical power cells, but they can release their stored energy a lot faster.



              Capacitors are usually not designed to hold a charge for longer than a couple hours, so the capacitors either need to be charged before the mission or during the mission from the fighter's internal power supply.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$








              • 3




                $begingroup$
                "... usually not designed to hold a charge..." ?? Depends drastically on the application. Whatever you do, never touch the flyback capacitor on a CRT without shorting it first. They hold significant voltage for years.
                $endgroup$
                – Carl Witthoft
                17 hours ago






              • 2




                $begingroup$
                @CarlWitthoft, years is a bit of an exaggeration. The self discharge rate of capacitors (as in no bleeder resistors) is still in the range of days. Supercapacitors have a lower self discharge rate but is still not remotely in the realm of years. Though, I'm always happy to be wrong, I did some quick checking but maybe I missed some edge case where that's true.
                $endgroup$
                – Jarrod Christman
                15 hours ago







              • 4




                $begingroup$
                Capacitor 'hold time' depends on design and materials used. While they'll slowly leak it is well within the realm of possibility to design such a capacitor that could be charged on loading of the weapon and last for a 6-12 hour mission with useful load. Also keep in mind that 'discharged' doesn't always mean 'empty' - Very large caps can still hold enough to give you a solid kick years later, even if they're well below 'useful' levels that it was intended to be used at. In short: Don't lick caps.
                $endgroup$
                – TheLuckless
                15 hours ago






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                I updated the answer in light of the recent comments.
                $endgroup$
                – Philipp
                15 hours ago










              • $begingroup$
                @TheLuckless if it's possible for it to hold charge years later, why can't you make us of that to develop a capacitor that holds charge for years?
                $endgroup$
                – Nathan Hinchey
                2 hours ago















              20












              $begingroup$

              Capacitors. These are electric components which store an electric charge for a limited amount of time and can release it very rapidly. They are relatively cheap and easy to manufacture. They are also reusable, but that doesn't matter in this case.



              Capacitors can be manufactured in many different ways depending on their desired characteristics. But in general they have a lower energy density than chemical power cells, but they can release their stored energy a lot faster.



              Capacitors are usually not designed to hold a charge for longer than a couple hours, so the capacitors either need to be charged before the mission or during the mission from the fighter's internal power supply.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$








              • 3




                $begingroup$
                "... usually not designed to hold a charge..." ?? Depends drastically on the application. Whatever you do, never touch the flyback capacitor on a CRT without shorting it first. They hold significant voltage for years.
                $endgroup$
                – Carl Witthoft
                17 hours ago






              • 2




                $begingroup$
                @CarlWitthoft, years is a bit of an exaggeration. The self discharge rate of capacitors (as in no bleeder resistors) is still in the range of days. Supercapacitors have a lower self discharge rate but is still not remotely in the realm of years. Though, I'm always happy to be wrong, I did some quick checking but maybe I missed some edge case where that's true.
                $endgroup$
                – Jarrod Christman
                15 hours ago







              • 4




                $begingroup$
                Capacitor 'hold time' depends on design and materials used. While they'll slowly leak it is well within the realm of possibility to design such a capacitor that could be charged on loading of the weapon and last for a 6-12 hour mission with useful load. Also keep in mind that 'discharged' doesn't always mean 'empty' - Very large caps can still hold enough to give you a solid kick years later, even if they're well below 'useful' levels that it was intended to be used at. In short: Don't lick caps.
                $endgroup$
                – TheLuckless
                15 hours ago






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                I updated the answer in light of the recent comments.
                $endgroup$
                – Philipp
                15 hours ago










              • $begingroup$
                @TheLuckless if it's possible for it to hold charge years later, why can't you make us of that to develop a capacitor that holds charge for years?
                $endgroup$
                – Nathan Hinchey
                2 hours ago













              20












              20








              20





              $begingroup$

              Capacitors. These are electric components which store an electric charge for a limited amount of time and can release it very rapidly. They are relatively cheap and easy to manufacture. They are also reusable, but that doesn't matter in this case.



              Capacitors can be manufactured in many different ways depending on their desired characteristics. But in general they have a lower energy density than chemical power cells, but they can release their stored energy a lot faster.



              Capacitors are usually not designed to hold a charge for longer than a couple hours, so the capacitors either need to be charged before the mission or during the mission from the fighter's internal power supply.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$



              Capacitors. These are electric components which store an electric charge for a limited amount of time and can release it very rapidly. They are relatively cheap and easy to manufacture. They are also reusable, but that doesn't matter in this case.



              Capacitors can be manufactured in many different ways depending on their desired characteristics. But in general they have a lower energy density than chemical power cells, but they can release their stored energy a lot faster.



              Capacitors are usually not designed to hold a charge for longer than a couple hours, so the capacitors either need to be charged before the mission or during the mission from the fighter's internal power supply.







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited 15 hours ago

























              answered 18 hours ago









              PhilippPhilipp

              31.8k1265123




              31.8k1265123







              • 3




                $begingroup$
                "... usually not designed to hold a charge..." ?? Depends drastically on the application. Whatever you do, never touch the flyback capacitor on a CRT without shorting it first. They hold significant voltage for years.
                $endgroup$
                – Carl Witthoft
                17 hours ago






              • 2




                $begingroup$
                @CarlWitthoft, years is a bit of an exaggeration. The self discharge rate of capacitors (as in no bleeder resistors) is still in the range of days. Supercapacitors have a lower self discharge rate but is still not remotely in the realm of years. Though, I'm always happy to be wrong, I did some quick checking but maybe I missed some edge case where that's true.
                $endgroup$
                – Jarrod Christman
                15 hours ago







              • 4




                $begingroup$
                Capacitor 'hold time' depends on design and materials used. While they'll slowly leak it is well within the realm of possibility to design such a capacitor that could be charged on loading of the weapon and last for a 6-12 hour mission with useful load. Also keep in mind that 'discharged' doesn't always mean 'empty' - Very large caps can still hold enough to give you a solid kick years later, even if they're well below 'useful' levels that it was intended to be used at. In short: Don't lick caps.
                $endgroup$
                – TheLuckless
                15 hours ago






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                I updated the answer in light of the recent comments.
                $endgroup$
                – Philipp
                15 hours ago










              • $begingroup$
                @TheLuckless if it's possible for it to hold charge years later, why can't you make us of that to develop a capacitor that holds charge for years?
                $endgroup$
                – Nathan Hinchey
                2 hours ago












              • 3




                $begingroup$
                "... usually not designed to hold a charge..." ?? Depends drastically on the application. Whatever you do, never touch the flyback capacitor on a CRT without shorting it first. They hold significant voltage for years.
                $endgroup$
                – Carl Witthoft
                17 hours ago






              • 2




                $begingroup$
                @CarlWitthoft, years is a bit of an exaggeration. The self discharge rate of capacitors (as in no bleeder resistors) is still in the range of days. Supercapacitors have a lower self discharge rate but is still not remotely in the realm of years. Though, I'm always happy to be wrong, I did some quick checking but maybe I missed some edge case where that's true.
                $endgroup$
                – Jarrod Christman
                15 hours ago







              • 4




                $begingroup$
                Capacitor 'hold time' depends on design and materials used. While they'll slowly leak it is well within the realm of possibility to design such a capacitor that could be charged on loading of the weapon and last for a 6-12 hour mission with useful load. Also keep in mind that 'discharged' doesn't always mean 'empty' - Very large caps can still hold enough to give you a solid kick years later, even if they're well below 'useful' levels that it was intended to be used at. In short: Don't lick caps.
                $endgroup$
                – TheLuckless
                15 hours ago






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                I updated the answer in light of the recent comments.
                $endgroup$
                – Philipp
                15 hours ago










              • $begingroup$
                @TheLuckless if it's possible for it to hold charge years later, why can't you make us of that to develop a capacitor that holds charge for years?
                $endgroup$
                – Nathan Hinchey
                2 hours ago







              3




              3




              $begingroup$
              "... usually not designed to hold a charge..." ?? Depends drastically on the application. Whatever you do, never touch the flyback capacitor on a CRT without shorting it first. They hold significant voltage for years.
              $endgroup$
              – Carl Witthoft
              17 hours ago




              $begingroup$
              "... usually not designed to hold a charge..." ?? Depends drastically on the application. Whatever you do, never touch the flyback capacitor on a CRT without shorting it first. They hold significant voltage for years.
              $endgroup$
              – Carl Witthoft
              17 hours ago




              2




              2




              $begingroup$
              @CarlWitthoft, years is a bit of an exaggeration. The self discharge rate of capacitors (as in no bleeder resistors) is still in the range of days. Supercapacitors have a lower self discharge rate but is still not remotely in the realm of years. Though, I'm always happy to be wrong, I did some quick checking but maybe I missed some edge case where that's true.
              $endgroup$
              – Jarrod Christman
              15 hours ago





              $begingroup$
              @CarlWitthoft, years is a bit of an exaggeration. The self discharge rate of capacitors (as in no bleeder resistors) is still in the range of days. Supercapacitors have a lower self discharge rate but is still not remotely in the realm of years. Though, I'm always happy to be wrong, I did some quick checking but maybe I missed some edge case where that's true.
              $endgroup$
              – Jarrod Christman
              15 hours ago





              4




              4




              $begingroup$
              Capacitor 'hold time' depends on design and materials used. While they'll slowly leak it is well within the realm of possibility to design such a capacitor that could be charged on loading of the weapon and last for a 6-12 hour mission with useful load. Also keep in mind that 'discharged' doesn't always mean 'empty' - Very large caps can still hold enough to give you a solid kick years later, even if they're well below 'useful' levels that it was intended to be used at. In short: Don't lick caps.
              $endgroup$
              – TheLuckless
              15 hours ago




              $begingroup$
              Capacitor 'hold time' depends on design and materials used. While they'll slowly leak it is well within the realm of possibility to design such a capacitor that could be charged on loading of the weapon and last for a 6-12 hour mission with useful load. Also keep in mind that 'discharged' doesn't always mean 'empty' - Very large caps can still hold enough to give you a solid kick years later, even if they're well below 'useful' levels that it was intended to be used at. In short: Don't lick caps.
              $endgroup$
              – TheLuckless
              15 hours ago




              1




              1




              $begingroup$
              I updated the answer in light of the recent comments.
              $endgroup$
              – Philipp
              15 hours ago




              $begingroup$
              I updated the answer in light of the recent comments.
              $endgroup$
              – Philipp
              15 hours ago












              $begingroup$
              @TheLuckless if it's possible for it to hold charge years later, why can't you make us of that to develop a capacitor that holds charge for years?
              $endgroup$
              – Nathan Hinchey
              2 hours ago




              $begingroup$
              @TheLuckless if it's possible for it to hold charge years later, why can't you make us of that to develop a capacitor that holds charge for years?
              $endgroup$
              – Nathan Hinchey
              2 hours ago











              12












              $begingroup$

              Pyrotechnics, in the form of twin spinning rockets rotating the saw axle. You have jet fighters, missiles would look like an obvious option. And as a bonus, a faulty device would explode throwing shrapnel into the enemy.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$

















                12












                $begingroup$

                Pyrotechnics, in the form of twin spinning rockets rotating the saw axle. You have jet fighters, missiles would look like an obvious option. And as a bonus, a faulty device would explode throwing shrapnel into the enemy.






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$















                  12












                  12








                  12





                  $begingroup$

                  Pyrotechnics, in the form of twin spinning rockets rotating the saw axle. You have jet fighters, missiles would look like an obvious option. And as a bonus, a faulty device would explode throwing shrapnel into the enemy.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  Pyrotechnics, in the form of twin spinning rockets rotating the saw axle. You have jet fighters, missiles would look like an obvious option. And as a bonus, a faulty device would explode throwing shrapnel into the enemy.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 15 hours ago









                  Lefty

                  1324




                  1324










                  answered 16 hours ago









                  Dan FernandezDan Fernandez

                  38116




                  38116





















                      11












                      $begingroup$

                      I would go for a pneumatic solution. It can support easily a 40 pound high pressure container storing sufficient energy for 15 seconds.






                      share|improve this answer








                      New contributor




                      user9 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.






                      $endgroup$








                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Also consider the giant farting sound on, ahem, discharge. Use methane as the gas, and then light the exhaust, and use the flame jets. IDK how, but use them.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Neal
                        10 hours ago







                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        @Neal simple: what's better than a chainsaw at maiming your enemy? The MurderCo Rocket-Propelled Chainsaw (patents pending)! Why use measly human (or whatever other species) appendages to thrust your chainsaw into your enemy when our patented diverters use the combustion exhaust to launch it at your enemy? Warning, adult supervision required, MurderCo is not responsible for loss of limbs or life, property damage, or damages caused by Acts of Stupid (which includes all actions taken using the MurderCo RPC).
                        $endgroup$
                        – Doktor J
                        9 hours ago















                      11












                      $begingroup$

                      I would go for a pneumatic solution. It can support easily a 40 pound high pressure container storing sufficient energy for 15 seconds.






                      share|improve this answer








                      New contributor




                      user9 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.






                      $endgroup$








                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Also consider the giant farting sound on, ahem, discharge. Use methane as the gas, and then light the exhaust, and use the flame jets. IDK how, but use them.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Neal
                        10 hours ago







                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        @Neal simple: what's better than a chainsaw at maiming your enemy? The MurderCo Rocket-Propelled Chainsaw (patents pending)! Why use measly human (or whatever other species) appendages to thrust your chainsaw into your enemy when our patented diverters use the combustion exhaust to launch it at your enemy? Warning, adult supervision required, MurderCo is not responsible for loss of limbs or life, property damage, or damages caused by Acts of Stupid (which includes all actions taken using the MurderCo RPC).
                        $endgroup$
                        – Doktor J
                        9 hours ago













                      11












                      11








                      11





                      $begingroup$

                      I would go for a pneumatic solution. It can support easily a 40 pound high pressure container storing sufficient energy for 15 seconds.






                      share|improve this answer








                      New contributor




                      user9 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.






                      $endgroup$



                      I would go for a pneumatic solution. It can support easily a 40 pound high pressure container storing sufficient energy for 15 seconds.







                      share|improve this answer








                      New contributor




                      user9 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer






                      New contributor




                      user9 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                      answered 18 hours ago









                      user9user9

                      1112




                      1112




                      New contributor




                      user9 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.





                      New contributor





                      user9 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.






                      user9 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.







                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Also consider the giant farting sound on, ahem, discharge. Use methane as the gas, and then light the exhaust, and use the flame jets. IDK how, but use them.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Neal
                        10 hours ago







                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        @Neal simple: what's better than a chainsaw at maiming your enemy? The MurderCo Rocket-Propelled Chainsaw (patents pending)! Why use measly human (or whatever other species) appendages to thrust your chainsaw into your enemy when our patented diverters use the combustion exhaust to launch it at your enemy? Warning, adult supervision required, MurderCo is not responsible for loss of limbs or life, property damage, or damages caused by Acts of Stupid (which includes all actions taken using the MurderCo RPC).
                        $endgroup$
                        – Doktor J
                        9 hours ago












                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Also consider the giant farting sound on, ahem, discharge. Use methane as the gas, and then light the exhaust, and use the flame jets. IDK how, but use them.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Neal
                        10 hours ago







                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        @Neal simple: what's better than a chainsaw at maiming your enemy? The MurderCo Rocket-Propelled Chainsaw (patents pending)! Why use measly human (or whatever other species) appendages to thrust your chainsaw into your enemy when our patented diverters use the combustion exhaust to launch it at your enemy? Warning, adult supervision required, MurderCo is not responsible for loss of limbs or life, property damage, or damages caused by Acts of Stupid (which includes all actions taken using the MurderCo RPC).
                        $endgroup$
                        – Doktor J
                        9 hours ago







                      1




                      1




                      $begingroup$
                      Also consider the giant farting sound on, ahem, discharge. Use methane as the gas, and then light the exhaust, and use the flame jets. IDK how, but use them.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Neal
                      10 hours ago





                      $begingroup$
                      Also consider the giant farting sound on, ahem, discharge. Use methane as the gas, and then light the exhaust, and use the flame jets. IDK how, but use them.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Neal
                      10 hours ago





                      1




                      1




                      $begingroup$
                      @Neal simple: what's better than a chainsaw at maiming your enemy? The MurderCo Rocket-Propelled Chainsaw (patents pending)! Why use measly human (or whatever other species) appendages to thrust your chainsaw into your enemy when our patented diverters use the combustion exhaust to launch it at your enemy? Warning, adult supervision required, MurderCo is not responsible for loss of limbs or life, property damage, or damages caused by Acts of Stupid (which includes all actions taken using the MurderCo RPC).
                      $endgroup$
                      – Doktor J
                      9 hours ago




                      $begingroup$
                      @Neal simple: what's better than a chainsaw at maiming your enemy? The MurderCo Rocket-Propelled Chainsaw (patents pending)! Why use measly human (or whatever other species) appendages to thrust your chainsaw into your enemy when our patented diverters use the combustion exhaust to launch it at your enemy? Warning, adult supervision required, MurderCo is not responsible for loss of limbs or life, property damage, or damages caused by Acts of Stupid (which includes all actions taken using the MurderCo RPC).
                      $endgroup$
                      – Doktor J
                      9 hours ago











                      6












                      $begingroup$

                      Well if you only need it very briefly I'd recommend a power cell.



                      Where batteries provide a slow trickle of stored energy over time,power cells can dump all of their energy in an instant. So that chainsaw purpose built to be disposable but very deadly could literally be torn apart from the energy it exerts in its short period of activity.



                      Also this means that being disposable the chainsaw would be made of cheaper materials. Since the power cell never needs to be replaced as it is a one-off use it can be made non-rechargeable and self-destructing. Not in the way it blows up when used, but it burns out the internal storage from the incredible heat and shock of the energy release.



                      All in all, the chainsaws shall exist. And they shall be terrifying. Maybe just make the edge out of carbon nano-tubes? Nano-tubes can also be used to store energy within their mass much like batteries or power cells. So you could literally make the chainsaw one giant power cell made of an extremely energy dense but light material that at 400 lbs would have enough power to immolate an elephant entirely most likely.



                      Your chainsaw would have the power of a bomb, all put towards a few glorious seconds to a minute at most of incredibly destructive power as the blade super heats and the chainsaw loses cohesion as the power which simultaneously kept it together suddenly runs out.



                      I hope this helps.






                      share|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$








                      • 4




                        $begingroup$
                        Aren't batteries and power cells the same thing? A battery is a group of several cells linked together. If you cut open something like an AA battery, you will find button cells inside of it. Even car batteries are made up of several different cells.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Liam Morris
                        19 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        @LiamMorris In fact, it may even be the opposite: each power gives you some power, so you want as many as possible to have the highest possible power (but for the shortest time)
                        $endgroup$
                        – Eth
                        19 hours ago






                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        Maybe use super capacitors. They can deliver huge amount of power in short time.
                        $endgroup$
                        – jnovacho
                        18 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        @jnovacho Good idea. I will write an answer based on this.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Philipp
                        18 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        What's this power cell you are talking about?
                        $endgroup$
                        – jpa
                        15 hours ago















                      6












                      $begingroup$

                      Well if you only need it very briefly I'd recommend a power cell.



                      Where batteries provide a slow trickle of stored energy over time,power cells can dump all of their energy in an instant. So that chainsaw purpose built to be disposable but very deadly could literally be torn apart from the energy it exerts in its short period of activity.



                      Also this means that being disposable the chainsaw would be made of cheaper materials. Since the power cell never needs to be replaced as it is a one-off use it can be made non-rechargeable and self-destructing. Not in the way it blows up when used, but it burns out the internal storage from the incredible heat and shock of the energy release.



                      All in all, the chainsaws shall exist. And they shall be terrifying. Maybe just make the edge out of carbon nano-tubes? Nano-tubes can also be used to store energy within their mass much like batteries or power cells. So you could literally make the chainsaw one giant power cell made of an extremely energy dense but light material that at 400 lbs would have enough power to immolate an elephant entirely most likely.



                      Your chainsaw would have the power of a bomb, all put towards a few glorious seconds to a minute at most of incredibly destructive power as the blade super heats and the chainsaw loses cohesion as the power which simultaneously kept it together suddenly runs out.



                      I hope this helps.






                      share|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$








                      • 4




                        $begingroup$
                        Aren't batteries and power cells the same thing? A battery is a group of several cells linked together. If you cut open something like an AA battery, you will find button cells inside of it. Even car batteries are made up of several different cells.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Liam Morris
                        19 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        @LiamMorris In fact, it may even be the opposite: each power gives you some power, so you want as many as possible to have the highest possible power (but for the shortest time)
                        $endgroup$
                        – Eth
                        19 hours ago






                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        Maybe use super capacitors. They can deliver huge amount of power in short time.
                        $endgroup$
                        – jnovacho
                        18 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        @jnovacho Good idea. I will write an answer based on this.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Philipp
                        18 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        What's this power cell you are talking about?
                        $endgroup$
                        – jpa
                        15 hours ago













                      6












                      6








                      6





                      $begingroup$

                      Well if you only need it very briefly I'd recommend a power cell.



                      Where batteries provide a slow trickle of stored energy over time,power cells can dump all of their energy in an instant. So that chainsaw purpose built to be disposable but very deadly could literally be torn apart from the energy it exerts in its short period of activity.



                      Also this means that being disposable the chainsaw would be made of cheaper materials. Since the power cell never needs to be replaced as it is a one-off use it can be made non-rechargeable and self-destructing. Not in the way it blows up when used, but it burns out the internal storage from the incredible heat and shock of the energy release.



                      All in all, the chainsaws shall exist. And they shall be terrifying. Maybe just make the edge out of carbon nano-tubes? Nano-tubes can also be used to store energy within their mass much like batteries or power cells. So you could literally make the chainsaw one giant power cell made of an extremely energy dense but light material that at 400 lbs would have enough power to immolate an elephant entirely most likely.



                      Your chainsaw would have the power of a bomb, all put towards a few glorious seconds to a minute at most of incredibly destructive power as the blade super heats and the chainsaw loses cohesion as the power which simultaneously kept it together suddenly runs out.



                      I hope this helps.






                      share|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$



                      Well if you only need it very briefly I'd recommend a power cell.



                      Where batteries provide a slow trickle of stored energy over time,power cells can dump all of their energy in an instant. So that chainsaw purpose built to be disposable but very deadly could literally be torn apart from the energy it exerts in its short period of activity.



                      Also this means that being disposable the chainsaw would be made of cheaper materials. Since the power cell never needs to be replaced as it is a one-off use it can be made non-rechargeable and self-destructing. Not in the way it blows up when used, but it burns out the internal storage from the incredible heat and shock of the energy release.



                      All in all, the chainsaws shall exist. And they shall be terrifying. Maybe just make the edge out of carbon nano-tubes? Nano-tubes can also be used to store energy within their mass much like batteries or power cells. So you could literally make the chainsaw one giant power cell made of an extremely energy dense but light material that at 400 lbs would have enough power to immolate an elephant entirely most likely.



                      Your chainsaw would have the power of a bomb, all put towards a few glorious seconds to a minute at most of incredibly destructive power as the blade super heats and the chainsaw loses cohesion as the power which simultaneously kept it together suddenly runs out.



                      I hope this helps.







                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited 19 hours ago









                      Separatrix

                      85.5k31198332




                      85.5k31198332










                      answered 20 hours ago









                      Jeremy BarrettJeremy Barrett

                      629115




                      629115







                      • 4




                        $begingroup$
                        Aren't batteries and power cells the same thing? A battery is a group of several cells linked together. If you cut open something like an AA battery, you will find button cells inside of it. Even car batteries are made up of several different cells.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Liam Morris
                        19 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        @LiamMorris In fact, it may even be the opposite: each power gives you some power, so you want as many as possible to have the highest possible power (but for the shortest time)
                        $endgroup$
                        – Eth
                        19 hours ago






                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        Maybe use super capacitors. They can deliver huge amount of power in short time.
                        $endgroup$
                        – jnovacho
                        18 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        @jnovacho Good idea. I will write an answer based on this.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Philipp
                        18 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        What's this power cell you are talking about?
                        $endgroup$
                        – jpa
                        15 hours ago












                      • 4




                        $begingroup$
                        Aren't batteries and power cells the same thing? A battery is a group of several cells linked together. If you cut open something like an AA battery, you will find button cells inside of it. Even car batteries are made up of several different cells.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Liam Morris
                        19 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        @LiamMorris In fact, it may even be the opposite: each power gives you some power, so you want as many as possible to have the highest possible power (but for the shortest time)
                        $endgroup$
                        – Eth
                        19 hours ago






                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        Maybe use super capacitors. They can deliver huge amount of power in short time.
                        $endgroup$
                        – jnovacho
                        18 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        @jnovacho Good idea. I will write an answer based on this.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Philipp
                        18 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        What's this power cell you are talking about?
                        $endgroup$
                        – jpa
                        15 hours ago







                      4




                      4




                      $begingroup$
                      Aren't batteries and power cells the same thing? A battery is a group of several cells linked together. If you cut open something like an AA battery, you will find button cells inside of it. Even car batteries are made up of several different cells.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Liam Morris
                      19 hours ago




                      $begingroup$
                      Aren't batteries and power cells the same thing? A battery is a group of several cells linked together. If you cut open something like an AA battery, you will find button cells inside of it. Even car batteries are made up of several different cells.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Liam Morris
                      19 hours ago












                      $begingroup$
                      @LiamMorris In fact, it may even be the opposite: each power gives you some power, so you want as many as possible to have the highest possible power (but for the shortest time)
                      $endgroup$
                      – Eth
                      19 hours ago




                      $begingroup$
                      @LiamMorris In fact, it may even be the opposite: each power gives you some power, so you want as many as possible to have the highest possible power (but for the shortest time)
                      $endgroup$
                      – Eth
                      19 hours ago




                      2




                      2




                      $begingroup$
                      Maybe use super capacitors. They can deliver huge amount of power in short time.
                      $endgroup$
                      – jnovacho
                      18 hours ago




                      $begingroup$
                      Maybe use super capacitors. They can deliver huge amount of power in short time.
                      $endgroup$
                      – jnovacho
                      18 hours ago












                      $begingroup$
                      @jnovacho Good idea. I will write an answer based on this.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Philipp
                      18 hours ago




                      $begingroup$
                      @jnovacho Good idea. I will write an answer based on this.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Philipp
                      18 hours ago












                      $begingroup$
                      What's this power cell you are talking about?
                      $endgroup$
                      – jpa
                      15 hours ago




                      $begingroup$
                      What's this power cell you are talking about?
                      $endgroup$
                      – jpa
                      15 hours ago











                      6












                      $begingroup$

                      As an alternative to coiled spring you can have your own gyro core (or flywheel).



                      Make a small and dense wheel to rotate very fast on pins in your chainsaw, virtually without energy loss, and then give it all away to chain blades. After it is discharged it becomes a useless piece of metal without any electronics or stuff. It is also much safer to operate than coiled spring.



                      If anything it will also stabilize delivery of this chainsaw.






                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$












                      • $begingroup$
                        Trying to manoeuvre such a weapon would be nigh on impossible if you used it to store any appreciable energy, surely?
                        $endgroup$
                        – Joe Bloggs
                        13 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        You could put your gyro core into gyro stabilizer, which will let you handle such weapon. Or maybe it's not even necessary given the question details.
                        $endgroup$
                        – alamar
                        13 hours ago






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Probably storing the spun up weapons in opposite-spun pairs always would compensate some unwanted effect AND stabilize your aircraft?
                        $endgroup$
                        – rackandboneman
                        4 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        Just use counter-rotating gyros.
                        $endgroup$
                        – RBarryYoung
                        3 hours ago















                      6












                      $begingroup$

                      As an alternative to coiled spring you can have your own gyro core (or flywheel).



                      Make a small and dense wheel to rotate very fast on pins in your chainsaw, virtually without energy loss, and then give it all away to chain blades. After it is discharged it becomes a useless piece of metal without any electronics or stuff. It is also much safer to operate than coiled spring.



                      If anything it will also stabilize delivery of this chainsaw.






                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$












                      • $begingroup$
                        Trying to manoeuvre such a weapon would be nigh on impossible if you used it to store any appreciable energy, surely?
                        $endgroup$
                        – Joe Bloggs
                        13 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        You could put your gyro core into gyro stabilizer, which will let you handle such weapon. Or maybe it's not even necessary given the question details.
                        $endgroup$
                        – alamar
                        13 hours ago






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Probably storing the spun up weapons in opposite-spun pairs always would compensate some unwanted effect AND stabilize your aircraft?
                        $endgroup$
                        – rackandboneman
                        4 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        Just use counter-rotating gyros.
                        $endgroup$
                        – RBarryYoung
                        3 hours ago













                      6












                      6








                      6





                      $begingroup$

                      As an alternative to coiled spring you can have your own gyro core (or flywheel).



                      Make a small and dense wheel to rotate very fast on pins in your chainsaw, virtually without energy loss, and then give it all away to chain blades. After it is discharged it becomes a useless piece of metal without any electronics or stuff. It is also much safer to operate than coiled spring.



                      If anything it will also stabilize delivery of this chainsaw.






                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$



                      As an alternative to coiled spring you can have your own gyro core (or flywheel).



                      Make a small and dense wheel to rotate very fast on pins in your chainsaw, virtually without energy loss, and then give it all away to chain blades. After it is discharged it becomes a useless piece of metal without any electronics or stuff. It is also much safer to operate than coiled spring.



                      If anything it will also stabilize delivery of this chainsaw.







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered 17 hours ago









                      alamaralamar

                      1,578315




                      1,578315











                      • $begingroup$
                        Trying to manoeuvre such a weapon would be nigh on impossible if you used it to store any appreciable energy, surely?
                        $endgroup$
                        – Joe Bloggs
                        13 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        You could put your gyro core into gyro stabilizer, which will let you handle such weapon. Or maybe it's not even necessary given the question details.
                        $endgroup$
                        – alamar
                        13 hours ago






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Probably storing the spun up weapons in opposite-spun pairs always would compensate some unwanted effect AND stabilize your aircraft?
                        $endgroup$
                        – rackandboneman
                        4 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        Just use counter-rotating gyros.
                        $endgroup$
                        – RBarryYoung
                        3 hours ago
















                      • $begingroup$
                        Trying to manoeuvre such a weapon would be nigh on impossible if you used it to store any appreciable energy, surely?
                        $endgroup$
                        – Joe Bloggs
                        13 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        You could put your gyro core into gyro stabilizer, which will let you handle such weapon. Or maybe it's not even necessary given the question details.
                        $endgroup$
                        – alamar
                        13 hours ago






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Probably storing the spun up weapons in opposite-spun pairs always would compensate some unwanted effect AND stabilize your aircraft?
                        $endgroup$
                        – rackandboneman
                        4 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        Just use counter-rotating gyros.
                        $endgroup$
                        – RBarryYoung
                        3 hours ago















                      $begingroup$
                      Trying to manoeuvre such a weapon would be nigh on impossible if you used it to store any appreciable energy, surely?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Joe Bloggs
                      13 hours ago




                      $begingroup$
                      Trying to manoeuvre such a weapon would be nigh on impossible if you used it to store any appreciable energy, surely?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Joe Bloggs
                      13 hours ago












                      $begingroup$
                      You could put your gyro core into gyro stabilizer, which will let you handle such weapon. Or maybe it's not even necessary given the question details.
                      $endgroup$
                      – alamar
                      13 hours ago




                      $begingroup$
                      You could put your gyro core into gyro stabilizer, which will let you handle such weapon. Or maybe it's not even necessary given the question details.
                      $endgroup$
                      – alamar
                      13 hours ago




                      1




                      1




                      $begingroup$
                      Probably storing the spun up weapons in opposite-spun pairs always would compensate some unwanted effect AND stabilize your aircraft?
                      $endgroup$
                      – rackandboneman
                      4 hours ago




                      $begingroup$
                      Probably storing the spun up weapons in opposite-spun pairs always would compensate some unwanted effect AND stabilize your aircraft?
                      $endgroup$
                      – rackandboneman
                      4 hours ago












                      $begingroup$
                      Just use counter-rotating gyros.
                      $endgroup$
                      – RBarryYoung
                      3 hours ago




                      $begingroup$
                      Just use counter-rotating gyros.
                      $endgroup$
                      – RBarryYoung
                      3 hours ago











                      2












                      $begingroup$

                      Well possibly the easiest power source to use would be a battery, you can accurately determine how much ‘life’ it could give to a piece of electronics by setting the max capacity and charging it until it is full.



                      Although, if your problem is just that you need to get the chainsaws down safely, i would recommend using parachutes or heavily padded drop boxes to ensure the contents were undamaged. At that point you could use whatever fuel you liked as it would not be damaged from the fall.



                      However, i don’t think you’d want to use chainsaws, especially ones that heavy, as weapons. They are not particularly effective, are slow and 400 pounds is about the weight of two humans. At that point you might as well be using a giant maul instead. Here is an answer where i explained the issues with chainsaw weapons. There is also a link to a youtube video in my answer which demonstrates my point.






                      share|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$








                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        But chainsaws are FUN . Signed, Anonymous From Texas
                        $endgroup$
                        – Carl Witthoft
                        17 hours ago















                      2












                      $begingroup$

                      Well possibly the easiest power source to use would be a battery, you can accurately determine how much ‘life’ it could give to a piece of electronics by setting the max capacity and charging it until it is full.



                      Although, if your problem is just that you need to get the chainsaws down safely, i would recommend using parachutes or heavily padded drop boxes to ensure the contents were undamaged. At that point you could use whatever fuel you liked as it would not be damaged from the fall.



                      However, i don’t think you’d want to use chainsaws, especially ones that heavy, as weapons. They are not particularly effective, are slow and 400 pounds is about the weight of two humans. At that point you might as well be using a giant maul instead. Here is an answer where i explained the issues with chainsaw weapons. There is also a link to a youtube video in my answer which demonstrates my point.






                      share|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$








                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        But chainsaws are FUN . Signed, Anonymous From Texas
                        $endgroup$
                        – Carl Witthoft
                        17 hours ago













                      2












                      2








                      2





                      $begingroup$

                      Well possibly the easiest power source to use would be a battery, you can accurately determine how much ‘life’ it could give to a piece of electronics by setting the max capacity and charging it until it is full.



                      Although, if your problem is just that you need to get the chainsaws down safely, i would recommend using parachutes or heavily padded drop boxes to ensure the contents were undamaged. At that point you could use whatever fuel you liked as it would not be damaged from the fall.



                      However, i don’t think you’d want to use chainsaws, especially ones that heavy, as weapons. They are not particularly effective, are slow and 400 pounds is about the weight of two humans. At that point you might as well be using a giant maul instead. Here is an answer where i explained the issues with chainsaw weapons. There is also a link to a youtube video in my answer which demonstrates my point.






                      share|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$



                      Well possibly the easiest power source to use would be a battery, you can accurately determine how much ‘life’ it could give to a piece of electronics by setting the max capacity and charging it until it is full.



                      Although, if your problem is just that you need to get the chainsaws down safely, i would recommend using parachutes or heavily padded drop boxes to ensure the contents were undamaged. At that point you could use whatever fuel you liked as it would not be damaged from the fall.



                      However, i don’t think you’d want to use chainsaws, especially ones that heavy, as weapons. They are not particularly effective, are slow and 400 pounds is about the weight of two humans. At that point you might as well be using a giant maul instead. Here is an answer where i explained the issues with chainsaw weapons. There is also a link to a youtube video in my answer which demonstrates my point.







                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited 19 hours ago

























                      answered 20 hours ago









                      Liam MorrisLiam Morris

                      1,506323




                      1,506323







                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        But chainsaws are FUN . Signed, Anonymous From Texas
                        $endgroup$
                        – Carl Witthoft
                        17 hours ago












                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        But chainsaws are FUN . Signed, Anonymous From Texas
                        $endgroup$
                        – Carl Witthoft
                        17 hours ago







                      1




                      1




                      $begingroup$
                      But chainsaws are FUN . Signed, Anonymous From Texas
                      $endgroup$
                      – Carl Witthoft
                      17 hours ago




                      $begingroup$
                      But chainsaws are FUN . Signed, Anonymous From Texas
                      $endgroup$
                      – Carl Witthoft
                      17 hours ago











                      2












                      $begingroup$

                      Since this is the sort of weapon that Coyote would be using against Roadrunner, it must be powered by the future power supply du jour.



                      In the 1950s that would have meant nuclear power, nowadays everything is battery powered, though some consider that the future is in hydrogen.



                      It very much depends on the tone of the situation you're creating.



                      The clean and neat nature of modern hydrogen fuel cells and batteries may not fit the context, so you might want to find some way of making it spew smoke and fire as it's powered up, that means coal or at the least diesel powered.






                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$

















                        2












                        $begingroup$

                        Since this is the sort of weapon that Coyote would be using against Roadrunner, it must be powered by the future power supply du jour.



                        In the 1950s that would have meant nuclear power, nowadays everything is battery powered, though some consider that the future is in hydrogen.



                        It very much depends on the tone of the situation you're creating.



                        The clean and neat nature of modern hydrogen fuel cells and batteries may not fit the context, so you might want to find some way of making it spew smoke and fire as it's powered up, that means coal or at the least diesel powered.






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$















                          2












                          2








                          2





                          $begingroup$

                          Since this is the sort of weapon that Coyote would be using against Roadrunner, it must be powered by the future power supply du jour.



                          In the 1950s that would have meant nuclear power, nowadays everything is battery powered, though some consider that the future is in hydrogen.



                          It very much depends on the tone of the situation you're creating.



                          The clean and neat nature of modern hydrogen fuel cells and batteries may not fit the context, so you might want to find some way of making it spew smoke and fire as it's powered up, that means coal or at the least diesel powered.






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          Since this is the sort of weapon that Coyote would be using against Roadrunner, it must be powered by the future power supply du jour.



                          In the 1950s that would have meant nuclear power, nowadays everything is battery powered, though some consider that the future is in hydrogen.



                          It very much depends on the tone of the situation you're creating.



                          The clean and neat nature of modern hydrogen fuel cells and batteries may not fit the context, so you might want to find some way of making it spew smoke and fire as it's powered up, that means coal or at the least diesel powered.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered 19 hours ago









                          SeparatrixSeparatrix

                          85.5k31198332




                          85.5k31198332





















                              1












                              $begingroup$

                              Expanding on Willk's answer here:



                              You have a "lander" and a chainsaw. The chainsaw is spring-powered. The lander has multiple rotors, say 3, that both break the fall and charge spring. It would basically look like a quadrocopter with a chainsaw at the bottom falling down.



                              A ratchet prevents the spring from discharging. A trigger mechanism in the chainsaw releases the ratchet and directs its power from the rotor coupling to the saw's chain - the chainsaw is running, purely from the energy from the fall.






                              share|improve this answer









                              $endgroup$

















                                1












                                $begingroup$

                                Expanding on Willk's answer here:



                                You have a "lander" and a chainsaw. The chainsaw is spring-powered. The lander has multiple rotors, say 3, that both break the fall and charge spring. It would basically look like a quadrocopter with a chainsaw at the bottom falling down.



                                A ratchet prevents the spring from discharging. A trigger mechanism in the chainsaw releases the ratchet and directs its power from the rotor coupling to the saw's chain - the chainsaw is running, purely from the energy from the fall.






                                share|improve this answer









                                $endgroup$















                                  1












                                  1








                                  1





                                  $begingroup$

                                  Expanding on Willk's answer here:



                                  You have a "lander" and a chainsaw. The chainsaw is spring-powered. The lander has multiple rotors, say 3, that both break the fall and charge spring. It would basically look like a quadrocopter with a chainsaw at the bottom falling down.



                                  A ratchet prevents the spring from discharging. A trigger mechanism in the chainsaw releases the ratchet and directs its power from the rotor coupling to the saw's chain - the chainsaw is running, purely from the energy from the fall.






                                  share|improve this answer









                                  $endgroup$



                                  Expanding on Willk's answer here:



                                  You have a "lander" and a chainsaw. The chainsaw is spring-powered. The lander has multiple rotors, say 3, that both break the fall and charge spring. It would basically look like a quadrocopter with a chainsaw at the bottom falling down.



                                  A ratchet prevents the spring from discharging. A trigger mechanism in the chainsaw releases the ratchet and directs its power from the rotor coupling to the saw's chain - the chainsaw is running, purely from the energy from the fall.







                                  share|improve this answer












                                  share|improve this answer



                                  share|improve this answer










                                  answered 17 hours ago









                                  InfrisiosInfrisios

                                  1,11838




                                  1,11838





















                                      1












                                      $begingroup$

                                      Googling "battery in missiles" led me to the page of a company manufacturing and selling such solutions.



                                      I am guessing your solution would be "thermal battery". I do not think they are selling a solution just for you but the duration and power can be tailored to application. Also, such batteries are used by military using similar "mil-tech" would probably fit the back story.



                                      Also such batteries are single use, durable, reliable and have long shelf life.



                                      Some of the other battery chemistries they offer might work better for you, so you might want to check them out. They might be rechargeable though.






                                      share|improve this answer









                                      $endgroup$

















                                        1












                                        $begingroup$

                                        Googling "battery in missiles" led me to the page of a company manufacturing and selling such solutions.



                                        I am guessing your solution would be "thermal battery". I do not think they are selling a solution just for you but the duration and power can be tailored to application. Also, such batteries are used by military using similar "mil-tech" would probably fit the back story.



                                        Also such batteries are single use, durable, reliable and have long shelf life.



                                        Some of the other battery chemistries they offer might work better for you, so you might want to check them out. They might be rechargeable though.






                                        share|improve this answer









                                        $endgroup$















                                          1












                                          1








                                          1





                                          $begingroup$

                                          Googling "battery in missiles" led me to the page of a company manufacturing and selling such solutions.



                                          I am guessing your solution would be "thermal battery". I do not think they are selling a solution just for you but the duration and power can be tailored to application. Also, such batteries are used by military using similar "mil-tech" would probably fit the back story.



                                          Also such batteries are single use, durable, reliable and have long shelf life.



                                          Some of the other battery chemistries they offer might work better for you, so you might want to check them out. They might be rechargeable though.






                                          share|improve this answer









                                          $endgroup$



                                          Googling "battery in missiles" led me to the page of a company manufacturing and selling such solutions.



                                          I am guessing your solution would be "thermal battery". I do not think they are selling a solution just for you but the duration and power can be tailored to application. Also, such batteries are used by military using similar "mil-tech" would probably fit the back story.



                                          Also such batteries are single use, durable, reliable and have long shelf life.



                                          Some of the other battery chemistries they offer might work better for you, so you might want to check them out. They might be rechargeable though.







                                          share|improve this answer












                                          share|improve this answer



                                          share|improve this answer










                                          answered 14 hours ago









                                          Ville NiemiVille Niemi

                                          35k260119




                                          35k260119





















                                              1












                                              $begingroup$

                                              I would go for a chemistry based solution. Think of current engines; they are all based on the concept of explosions. Now think of a giant explosion happening on release of the chainsaw. It would create enough pressure to power the chainsaw for quite some time.






                                              share|improve this answer









                                              $endgroup$

















                                                1












                                                $begingroup$

                                                I would go for a chemistry based solution. Think of current engines; they are all based on the concept of explosions. Now think of a giant explosion happening on release of the chainsaw. It would create enough pressure to power the chainsaw for quite some time.






                                                share|improve this answer









                                                $endgroup$















                                                  1












                                                  1








                                                  1





                                                  $begingroup$

                                                  I would go for a chemistry based solution. Think of current engines; they are all based on the concept of explosions. Now think of a giant explosion happening on release of the chainsaw. It would create enough pressure to power the chainsaw for quite some time.






                                                  share|improve this answer









                                                  $endgroup$



                                                  I would go for a chemistry based solution. Think of current engines; they are all based on the concept of explosions. Now think of a giant explosion happening on release of the chainsaw. It would create enough pressure to power the chainsaw for quite some time.







                                                  share|improve this answer












                                                  share|improve this answer



                                                  share|improve this answer










                                                  answered 10 hours ago









                                                  LMDLMD

                                                  3145




                                                  3145





















                                                      1












                                                      $begingroup$

                                                      Launching from a plane, that chainsaw is going to waste a lot of nice gravitational energy, which could be used for much more interesting tasks, such as providing motion to the chainsaw itself.



                                                      So, the chainsaw itself is tethered to the plane with a very long roller chain, which is connected to a pinion inside the chainsaw (think of a Beyblade launcher).

                                                      When launched from the plane, the chainsaw falls, so that the roller chain makes the pinion start rotating. The pinion will then transmit the motion to the chainsaw, so that it will rotate at full speed when touching ground!



                                                      Alternatively, a parachute could open and hold a reel with the roller chain tethered to the chainsaw, which is still falling relative to the parachute.






                                                      share|improve this answer











                                                      $endgroup$

















                                                        1












                                                        $begingroup$

                                                        Launching from a plane, that chainsaw is going to waste a lot of nice gravitational energy, which could be used for much more interesting tasks, such as providing motion to the chainsaw itself.



                                                        So, the chainsaw itself is tethered to the plane with a very long roller chain, which is connected to a pinion inside the chainsaw (think of a Beyblade launcher).

                                                        When launched from the plane, the chainsaw falls, so that the roller chain makes the pinion start rotating. The pinion will then transmit the motion to the chainsaw, so that it will rotate at full speed when touching ground!



                                                        Alternatively, a parachute could open and hold a reel with the roller chain tethered to the chainsaw, which is still falling relative to the parachute.






                                                        share|improve this answer











                                                        $endgroup$















                                                          1












                                                          1








                                                          1





                                                          $begingroup$

                                                          Launching from a plane, that chainsaw is going to waste a lot of nice gravitational energy, which could be used for much more interesting tasks, such as providing motion to the chainsaw itself.



                                                          So, the chainsaw itself is tethered to the plane with a very long roller chain, which is connected to a pinion inside the chainsaw (think of a Beyblade launcher).

                                                          When launched from the plane, the chainsaw falls, so that the roller chain makes the pinion start rotating. The pinion will then transmit the motion to the chainsaw, so that it will rotate at full speed when touching ground!



                                                          Alternatively, a parachute could open and hold a reel with the roller chain tethered to the chainsaw, which is still falling relative to the parachute.






                                                          share|improve this answer











                                                          $endgroup$



                                                          Launching from a plane, that chainsaw is going to waste a lot of nice gravitational energy, which could be used for much more interesting tasks, such as providing motion to the chainsaw itself.



                                                          So, the chainsaw itself is tethered to the plane with a very long roller chain, which is connected to a pinion inside the chainsaw (think of a Beyblade launcher).

                                                          When launched from the plane, the chainsaw falls, so that the roller chain makes the pinion start rotating. The pinion will then transmit the motion to the chainsaw, so that it will rotate at full speed when touching ground!



                                                          Alternatively, a parachute could open and hold a reel with the roller chain tethered to the chainsaw, which is still falling relative to the parachute.







                                                          share|improve this answer














                                                          share|improve this answer



                                                          share|improve this answer








                                                          edited 10 hours ago









                                                          Emilio M Bumachar

                                                          4,5681122




                                                          4,5681122










                                                          answered 13 hours ago









                                                          McTroopersMcTroopers

                                                          1,0406




                                                          1,0406





















                                                              0












                                                              $begingroup$

                                                              Dual liquid explosive, the force would trash the mechanism but its a one use weapon.






                                                              share|improve this answer









                                                              $endgroup$












                                                              • $begingroup$
                                                                These are normally called binary explosives, just for reference.
                                                                $endgroup$
                                                                – ltmauve
                                                                6 hours ago















                                                              0












                                                              $begingroup$

                                                              Dual liquid explosive, the force would trash the mechanism but its a one use weapon.






                                                              share|improve this answer









                                                              $endgroup$












                                                              • $begingroup$
                                                                These are normally called binary explosives, just for reference.
                                                                $endgroup$
                                                                – ltmauve
                                                                6 hours ago













                                                              0












                                                              0








                                                              0





                                                              $begingroup$

                                                              Dual liquid explosive, the force would trash the mechanism but its a one use weapon.






                                                              share|improve this answer









                                                              $endgroup$



                                                              Dual liquid explosive, the force would trash the mechanism but its a one use weapon.







                                                              share|improve this answer












                                                              share|improve this answer



                                                              share|improve this answer










                                                              answered 8 hours ago









                                                              ObakObak

                                                              515




                                                              515











                                                              • $begingroup$
                                                                These are normally called binary explosives, just for reference.
                                                                $endgroup$
                                                                – ltmauve
                                                                6 hours ago
















                                                              • $begingroup$
                                                                These are normally called binary explosives, just for reference.
                                                                $endgroup$
                                                                – ltmauve
                                                                6 hours ago















                                                              $begingroup$
                                                              These are normally called binary explosives, just for reference.
                                                              $endgroup$
                                                              – ltmauve
                                                              6 hours ago




                                                              $begingroup$
                                                              These are normally called binary explosives, just for reference.
                                                              $endgroup$
                                                              – ltmauve
                                                              6 hours ago

















                                                              draft saved

                                                              draft discarded
















































                                                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


                                                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                                              But avoid


                                                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                                              draft saved


                                                              draft discarded














                                                              StackExchange.ready(
                                                              function ()
                                                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143551%2fwhat-could-be-the-right-powersource-for-15-seconds-lifespan-disposable-giant-cha%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                                              );

                                                              Post as a guest















                                                              Required, but never shown





















































                                                              Required, but never shown














                                                              Required, but never shown












                                                              Required, but never shown







                                                              Required, but never shown

































                                                              Required, but never shown














                                                              Required, but never shown












                                                              Required, but never shown







                                                              Required, but never shown







                                                              Popular posts from this blog

                                                              Reverse int within the 32-bit signed integer range: [−2^31, 2^31 − 1]Combining two 32-bit integers into one 64-bit integerDetermine if an int is within rangeLossy packing 32 bit integer to 16 bitComputing the square root of a 64-bit integerKeeping integer addition within boundsSafe multiplication of two 64-bit signed integersLeetcode 10: Regular Expression MatchingSigned integer-to-ascii x86_64 assembler macroReverse the digits of an Integer“Add two numbers given in reverse order from a linked list”

                                                              Category:Fedor von Bock Media in category "Fedor von Bock"Navigation menuUpload mediaISNI: 0000 0000 5511 3417VIAF ID: 24712551GND ID: 119294796Library of Congress authority ID: n96068363BnF ID: 12534305fSUDOC authorities ID: 034604189Open Library ID: OL338253ANKCR AUT ID: jn19990000869National Library of Israel ID: 000514068National Thesaurus for Author Names ID: 341574317ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

                                                              Kiel Indholdsfortegnelse Historie | Transport og færgeforbindelser | Sejlsport og anden sport | Kultur | Kendte personer fra Kiel | Noter | Litteratur | Eksterne henvisninger | Navigationsmenuwww.kiel.de54°19′31″N 10°8′26″Ø / 54.32528°N 10.14056°Ø / 54.32528; 10.14056Oberbürgermeister Dr. Ulf Kämpferwww.statistik-nord.deDen danske Stats StatistikKiels hjemmesiderrrWorldCat312794080n790547494030481-4