Where does the Shulchan Aruch quote an authority by name? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InParashat Metzora+HagadolPesach/PassoverWhat rules did Hamechaber set to himself before compiling the Shulchan Aruch?Shulchan Aruch UTF-8Anonymous glosses in the Shulchan AruchWhy is the Shulchan Aruch definitive?Siman 32, Kitzur Shulchan Aruch: UntranslatedLitvaks/Yeshivish and Shulchan AruchBuying a Shulchan AruchEnglish version of SHULCHAN ARUCHIs there any place where Shulchan Aruch rules with the Rosh against the Rif and Rambam?5th part of the shulchan aruchLearning to translate the Shulchan Aruch
Limit the amount of RAM Mathematica may access?
Is this food a bread or a loaf?
Inflated grade on resume at previous job, might former employer tell new employer?
How to deal with fear of taking dependencies
Does duplicating a spell with Wish count as casting that spell?
What are the motivations for publishing new editions of an existing textbook, beyond new discoveries in a field?
Why don't Unix/Linux systems traverse through directories until they find the required version of a linked library?
If a poisoned arrow's piercing damage is reduced to 0, do you still get poisoned?
Is "plugging out" electronic devices an American expression?
"To split hairs" vs "To be pedantic"
Dual Citizen. Exited the US on Italian passport recently
What could be the right powersource for 15 seconds lifespan disposable giant chainsaw?
Access elements in std::string where positon of string is greater than its size
What tool would a Roman-age civilization have to grind silver and other metals into dust?
Is domain driven design an anti-SQL pattern?
Unbreakable Formation vs. Cry of the Carnarium
A poker game description that does not feel gimmicky
Evaluating number of iteration with a certain map with While
Why do UK politicians seemingly ignore opinion polls on Brexit?
I looked up a future colleague on LinkedIn before I started a job. I told my colleague about it and he seemed surprised. Should I apologize?
On the insanity of kings as an argument against Monarchy
Should I use my personal or workplace e-mail when registering to external websites for work purpose?
Time travel alters history but people keep saying nothing's changed
Deadlock Graph and Interpretation, solution to avoid
Where does the Shulchan Aruch quote an authority by name?
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InParashat Metzora+HagadolPesach/PassoverWhat rules did Hamechaber set to himself before compiling the Shulchan Aruch?Shulchan Aruch UTF-8Anonymous glosses in the Shulchan AruchWhy is the Shulchan Aruch definitive?Siman 32, Kitzur Shulchan Aruch: UntranslatedLitvaks/Yeshivish and Shulchan AruchBuying a Shulchan AruchEnglish version of SHULCHAN ARUCHIs there any place where Shulchan Aruch rules with the Rosh against the Rif and Rambam?5th part of the shulchan aruchLearning to translate the Shulchan Aruch
Generally speaking, R' Yosef Karo doesn't quote authorities by name in his Shulchan Aruch, but rather focuses on what the halacha is in the Shulchan Aruch and leaves the various opinions and rationales to be explained in his Beis Yosef.
In going through Hilchos Pesach, I stumbled upon the first exception I've seen to this, in OC 460:2 (translation is Sefaria's):
הרא"ש היה משתדל במצת מצוה ועומד על עשיית' ומזרז העוסקים ומסייע בהן בעריכתן
The R"ASH would personally deliberate on the Matzot Mitzvah and oversee the production, inspire those working and assisting them in the flattening [of the dough].
Is this unique in the Shulchan Aruch, or are there other places where he refers to an authority by name?
shulchan-aruch
edited 17 hours ago
Al Berko
6,5141529
asked yesterday
DonielFDonielF
17k12689
add a comment |
Generally speaking, R' Yosef Karo doesn't quote authorities by name in his Shulchan Aruch, but rather focuses on what the halacha is in the Shulchan Aruch and leaves the various opinions and rationales to be explained in his Beis Yosef.
In going through Hilchos Pesach, I stumbled upon the first exception I've seen to this, in OC 460:2 (translation is Sefaria's):
הרא"ש היה משתדל במצת מצוה ועומד על עשיית' ומזרז העוסקים ומסייע בהן בעריכתן
The R"ASH would personally deliberate on the Matzot Mitzvah and oversee the production, inspire those working and assisting them in the flattening [of the dough].
Is this unique in the Shulchan Aruch, or are there other places where he refers to an authority by name?
shulchan-aruch
edited 17 hours ago
Al Berko
6,5141529
asked yesterday
DonielFDonielF
17k12689
I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin
– Dr. Shmuel
yesterday
2
There are dozens of such examples
– Double AA♦
yesterday
In general, do you imply Hamechaber had a systematic approach to writing S"A - like mentioning some and ignoring others?
– Al Berko
17 hours ago
Related (just posted) judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/101696/…
– Al Berko
17 hours ago
add a comment |
Generally speaking, R' Yosef Karo doesn't quote authorities by name in his Shulchan Aruch, but rather focuses on what the halacha is in the Shulchan Aruch and leaves the various opinions and rationales to be explained in his Beis Yosef.
In going through Hilchos Pesach, I stumbled upon the first exception I've seen to this, in OC 460:2 (translation is Sefaria's):
הרא"ש היה משתדל במצת מצוה ועומד על עשיית' ומזרז העוסקים ומסייע בהן בעריכתן
The R"ASH would personally deliberate on the Matzot Mitzvah and oversee the production, inspire those working and assisting them in the flattening [of the dough].
Is this unique in the Shulchan Aruch, or are there other places where he refers to an authority by name?
shulchan-aruch
edited 17 hours ago
Al Berko
6,5141529
asked yesterday
DonielFDonielF
17k12689
Generally speaking, R' Yosef Karo doesn't quote authorities by name in his Shulchan Aruch, but rather focuses on what the halacha is in the Shulchan Aruch and leaves the various opinions and rationales to be explained in his Beis Yosef.
In going through Hilchos Pesach, I stumbled upon the first exception I've seen to this, in OC 460:2 (translation is Sefaria's):
הרא"ש היה משתדל במצת מצוה ועומד על עשיית' ומזרז העוסקים ומסייע בהן בעריכתן
The R"ASH would personally deliberate on the Matzot Mitzvah and oversee the production, inspire those working and assisting them in the flattening [of the dough].
Is this unique in the Shulchan Aruch, or are there other places where he refers to an authority by name?
shulchan-aruch
shulchan-aruch
edited 17 hours ago
Al Berko
6,5141529
asked yesterday
DonielFDonielF
17k12689
edited 17 hours ago
Al Berko
6,5141529
asked yesterday
DonielFDonielF
17k12689
edited 17 hours ago
Al Berko
6,5141529
edited 17 hours ago
Al Berko
6,5141529
edited 17 hours ago
Al Berko
6,5141529
6,5141529
asked yesterday
DonielFDonielF
17k12689
asked yesterday
DonielFDonielF
17k12689
asked yesterday
DonielFDonielF
17k12689
17k12689
I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin
– Dr. Shmuel
yesterday
2
There are dozens of such examples
– Double AA♦
yesterday
In general, do you imply Hamechaber had a systematic approach to writing S"A - like mentioning some and ignoring others?
– Al Berko
17 hours ago
Related (just posted) judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/101696/…
– Al Berko
17 hours ago
add a comment |
I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin
– Dr. Shmuel
yesterday
2
There are dozens of such examples
– Double AA♦
yesterday
In general, do you imply Hamechaber had a systematic approach to writing S"A - like mentioning some and ignoring others?
– Al Berko
17 hours ago
Related (just posted) judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/101696/…
– Al Berko
17 hours ago
I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin
– Dr. Shmuel
yesterday
I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin
– Dr. Shmuel
yesterday
2
2
There are dozens of such examples
– Double AA♦
yesterday
There are dozens of such examples
– Double AA♦
yesterday
In general, do you imply Hamechaber had a systematic approach to writing S"A - like mentioning some and ignoring others?
– Al Berko
17 hours ago
In general, do you imply Hamechaber had a systematic approach to writing S"A - like mentioning some and ignoring others?
– Al Berko
17 hours ago
Related (just posted) judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/101696/…
– Al Berko
17 hours ago
Related (just posted) judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/101696/…
– Al Berko
17 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
It's actually not that rare for the Shulchan Aruch to mention authorities by name. Here are a bunch of examples of different authorities mentioned:
In O.C. 34:1 he mentions a dispute involving Rashi, Rambam, and Rabbeinu Tam:
סדר הנחתן בבתיםלרש"י והרמב"ם קדש משמאל המניח בבית החיצון ואחריו כי יביאך בבית שני ושמע בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע בבית הרביעי שהוא בית החיצון ב לימינו ולר"ת בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע ובבית הרביעי שהוא החיצון שמע ומנהג העולם כרש"י והרמב"ם
In O.C. 185:5 he mentions an uncertainty that Tosafos and the Rosh had:
ואם בירך והיתה צואה כנגדו או שהיה שכור (פי' לגמרי) נסתפקו התוספות והרא"ש אם צריך לחזור ולברך ומשום מי רגלים פשיטא שאינו חוזר לברך
In O.C. 320:14 he mentions a dispute between R. Meir of Rothenberg and the Rosh:
הר"מ מרוטנבורג מתיר להטיל מי רגלים בשלג והרא"ש היה נזהר
O.C. 591:6 he mentions that the Ran and the Rosh defended a custom:
והרא"ש והר"ן כתבו לקיים המנהג
There are many other examples of this, some where multiple authorities are listed together or contrasted, and some where only one authority is cited.
answered yesterday
AlexAlex
23.4k157134
add a comment |
Here's a double naming in hilchos muktza:
הרשב"א מתיר לטלטל האיצטרלו"ב בשבת וכן ספרי החכמה ולדעת הרמב"ם יש להסתפק בדבר:
answered yesterday
user6591user6591
25.8k12758
This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.
– user6591
yesterday
First thing to pop on my mind
– sam
yesterday
There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested
– Double AA♦
yesterday
1
@Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.
– user6591
yesterday
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
It's actually not that rare for the Shulchan Aruch to mention authorities by name. Here are a bunch of examples of different authorities mentioned:
In O.C. 34:1 he mentions a dispute involving Rashi, Rambam, and Rabbeinu Tam:
סדר הנחתן בבתיםלרש"י והרמב"ם קדש משמאל המניח בבית החיצון ואחריו כי יביאך בבית שני ושמע בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע בבית הרביעי שהוא בית החיצון ב לימינו ולר"ת בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע ובבית הרביעי שהוא החיצון שמע ומנהג העולם כרש"י והרמב"ם
In O.C. 185:5 he mentions an uncertainty that Tosafos and the Rosh had:
ואם בירך והיתה צואה כנגדו או שהיה שכור (פי' לגמרי) נסתפקו התוספות והרא"ש אם צריך לחזור ולברך ומשום מי רגלים פשיטא שאינו חוזר לברך
In O.C. 320:14 he mentions a dispute between R. Meir of Rothenberg and the Rosh:
הר"מ מרוטנבורג מתיר להטיל מי רגלים בשלג והרא"ש היה נזהר
O.C. 591:6 he mentions that the Ran and the Rosh defended a custom:
והרא"ש והר"ן כתבו לקיים המנהג
There are many other examples of this, some where multiple authorities are listed together or contrasted, and some where only one authority is cited.
answered yesterday
AlexAlex
23.4k157134
add a comment |
It's actually not that rare for the Shulchan Aruch to mention authorities by name. Here are a bunch of examples of different authorities mentioned:
In O.C. 34:1 he mentions a dispute involving Rashi, Rambam, and Rabbeinu Tam:
סדר הנחתן בבתיםלרש"י והרמב"ם קדש משמאל המניח בבית החיצון ואחריו כי יביאך בבית שני ושמע בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע בבית הרביעי שהוא בית החיצון ב לימינו ולר"ת בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע ובבית הרביעי שהוא החיצון שמע ומנהג העולם כרש"י והרמב"ם
In O.C. 185:5 he mentions an uncertainty that Tosafos and the Rosh had:
ואם בירך והיתה צואה כנגדו או שהיה שכור (פי' לגמרי) נסתפקו התוספות והרא"ש אם צריך לחזור ולברך ומשום מי רגלים פשיטא שאינו חוזר לברך
In O.C. 320:14 he mentions a dispute between R. Meir of Rothenberg and the Rosh:
הר"מ מרוטנבורג מתיר להטיל מי רגלים בשלג והרא"ש היה נזהר
O.C. 591:6 he mentions that the Ran and the Rosh defended a custom:
והרא"ש והר"ן כתבו לקיים המנהג
There are many other examples of this, some where multiple authorities are listed together or contrasted, and some where only one authority is cited.
answered yesterday
AlexAlex
23.4k157134
add a comment |
It's actually not that rare for the Shulchan Aruch to mention authorities by name. Here are a bunch of examples of different authorities mentioned:
In O.C. 34:1 he mentions a dispute involving Rashi, Rambam, and Rabbeinu Tam:
סדר הנחתן בבתיםלרש"י והרמב"ם קדש משמאל המניח בבית החיצון ואחריו כי יביאך בבית שני ושמע בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע בבית הרביעי שהוא בית החיצון ב לימינו ולר"ת בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע ובבית הרביעי שהוא החיצון שמע ומנהג העולם כרש"י והרמב"ם
In O.C. 185:5 he mentions an uncertainty that Tosafos and the Rosh had:
ואם בירך והיתה צואה כנגדו או שהיה שכור (פי' לגמרי) נסתפקו התוספות והרא"ש אם צריך לחזור ולברך ומשום מי רגלים פשיטא שאינו חוזר לברך
In O.C. 320:14 he mentions a dispute between R. Meir of Rothenberg and the Rosh:
הר"מ מרוטנבורג מתיר להטיל מי רגלים בשלג והרא"ש היה נזהר
O.C. 591:6 he mentions that the Ran and the Rosh defended a custom:
והרא"ש והר"ן כתבו לקיים המנהג
There are many other examples of this, some where multiple authorities are listed together or contrasted, and some where only one authority is cited.
answered yesterday
AlexAlex
23.4k157134
It's actually not that rare for the Shulchan Aruch to mention authorities by name. Here are a bunch of examples of different authorities mentioned:
In O.C. 34:1 he mentions a dispute involving Rashi, Rambam, and Rabbeinu Tam:
סדר הנחתן בבתיםלרש"י והרמב"ם קדש משמאל המניח בבית החיצון ואחריו כי יביאך בבית שני ושמע בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע בבית הרביעי שהוא בית החיצון ב לימינו ולר"ת בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע ובבית הרביעי שהוא החיצון שמע ומנהג העולם כרש"י והרמב"ם
In O.C. 185:5 he mentions an uncertainty that Tosafos and the Rosh had:
ואם בירך והיתה צואה כנגדו או שהיה שכור (פי' לגמרי) נסתפקו התוספות והרא"ש אם צריך לחזור ולברך ומשום מי רגלים פשיטא שאינו חוזר לברך
In O.C. 320:14 he mentions a dispute between R. Meir of Rothenberg and the Rosh:
הר"מ מרוטנבורג מתיר להטיל מי רגלים בשלג והרא"ש היה נזהר
O.C. 591:6 he mentions that the Ran and the Rosh defended a custom:
והרא"ש והר"ן כתבו לקיים המנהג
There are many other examples of this, some where multiple authorities are listed together or contrasted, and some where only one authority is cited.
answered yesterday
AlexAlex
23.4k157134
answered yesterday
AlexAlex
23.4k157134
answered yesterday
AlexAlex
23.4k157134
answered yesterday
AlexAlex
23.4k157134
23.4k157134
add a comment |
add a comment |
Here's a double naming in hilchos muktza:
הרשב"א מתיר לטלטל האיצטרלו"ב בשבת וכן ספרי החכמה ולדעת הרמב"ם יש להסתפק בדבר:
answered yesterday
user6591user6591
25.8k12758
This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.
– user6591
yesterday
First thing to pop on my mind
– sam
yesterday
There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested
– Double AA♦
yesterday
1
@Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.
– user6591
yesterday
add a comment |
Here's a double naming in hilchos muktza:
הרשב"א מתיר לטלטל האיצטרלו"ב בשבת וכן ספרי החכמה ולדעת הרמב"ם יש להסתפק בדבר:
answered yesterday
user6591user6591
25.8k12758
This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.
– user6591
yesterday
First thing to pop on my mind
– sam
yesterday
There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested
– Double AA♦
yesterday
1
@Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.
– user6591
yesterday
add a comment |
Here's a double naming in hilchos muktza:
הרשב"א מתיר לטלטל האיצטרלו"ב בשבת וכן ספרי החכמה ולדעת הרמב"ם יש להסתפק בדבר:
answered yesterday
user6591user6591
25.8k12758
Here's a double naming in hilchos muktza:
הרשב"א מתיר לטלטל האיצטרלו"ב בשבת וכן ספרי החכמה ולדעת הרמב"ם יש להסתפק בדבר:
answered yesterday
user6591user6591
25.8k12758
answered yesterday
user6591user6591
25.8k12758
answered yesterday
user6591user6591
25.8k12758
answered yesterday
user6591user6591
25.8k12758
25.8k12758
This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.
– user6591
yesterday
First thing to pop on my mind
– sam
yesterday
There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested
– Double AA♦
yesterday
1
@Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.
– user6591
yesterday
add a comment |
This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.
– user6591
yesterday
First thing to pop on my mind
– sam
yesterday
There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested
– Double AA♦
yesterday
1
@Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.
– user6591
yesterday
This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.
– user6591
yesterday
This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.
– user6591
yesterday
First thing to pop on my mind
– sam
yesterday
First thing to pop on my mind
– sam
yesterday
There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested
– Double AA♦
yesterday
There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested
– Double AA♦
yesterday
1
1
@Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.
– user6591
yesterday
@Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.
– user6591
yesterday
add a comment |
I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin
– Dr. Shmuel
yesterday
2
There are dozens of such examples
– Double AA♦
yesterday
In general, do you imply Hamechaber had a systematic approach to writing S"A - like mentioning some and ignoring others?
– Al Berko
17 hours ago
Related (just posted) judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/101696/…
– Al Berko
17 hours ago