Why doesn't Newton's third law mean a person bounces back to where they started when they hit the ground?With Newton's third law, why are things capable of moving?Clarification regarding Newton's Third Law of Motion and why movement is possibleAccording to Newton's third law, why don't Action and Reaction make equilibrium?Person Pushing a Block vs. People Pushing off Each Other - Newton's Third LawNewton's third law of motion when moving between two surfacesConfused about Newton's 3rd lawHow did tension developed in a string when two equal and opposite forces are applied on the same body?Why does a Ball bounce back if Forces are Equal and Opposite?Why doesn't an object that collides with one that is at rest just do a 180?Newton's $3^rd$ Law of motionWhy does Newton's Third Law work for fields?

Has there ever been an airliner design involving reducing generator load by installing solar panels?

Does an object always see its latest internal state irrespective of thread?

High voltage LED indicator 40-1000 VDC without additional power supply

Can you really stack all of this on an Opportunity Attack?

Revoked SSL certificate

Alternative to sending password over mail?

Modeling an IP Address

What does it mean to describe someone as a butt steak?

dbcc cleantable batch size explanation

A newer friend of my brother's gave him a load of baseball cards that are supposedly extremely valuable. Is this a scam?

Cross compiling for RPi - error while loading shared libraries

When a company launches a new product do they "come out" with a new product or do they "come up" with a new product?

Which country benefited the most from UN Security Council vetoes?

How do I deal with an unproductive colleague in a small company?

Why doesn't H₄O²⁺ exist?

Why do I get two different answers for this counting problem?

NMaximize is not converging to a solution

How much RAM could one put in a typical 80386 setup?

infared filters v nd

Is it unprofessional to ask if a job posting on GlassDoor is real?

What is the word for reserving something for yourself before others do?

What would happen to a modern skyscraper if it rains micro blackholes?

Is it possible to do 50 km distance without any previous training?

Today is the Center



Why doesn't Newton's third law mean a person bounces back to where they started when they hit the ground?


With Newton's third law, why are things capable of moving?Clarification regarding Newton's Third Law of Motion and why movement is possibleAccording to Newton's third law, why don't Action and Reaction make equilibrium?Person Pushing a Block vs. People Pushing off Each Other - Newton's Third LawNewton's third law of motion when moving between two surfacesConfused about Newton's 3rd lawHow did tension developed in a string when two equal and opposite forces are applied on the same body?Why does a Ball bounce back if Forces are Equal and Opposite?Why doesn't an object that collides with one that is at rest just do a 180?Newton's $3^rd$ Law of motionWhy does Newton's Third Law work for fields?













10












$begingroup$


Why doesn't a person bounce back after falling down like a ball? If we push a person and he falls down then why doesn't he come back to its initial position. Although according to Newton's 3rd law of motion: To every action there is always equal but opposite reaction. If we take the example of ball then it comes back with the same force as it falls down.But in the case of a human body, this law is not applicable. Why?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




nameera jabeen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Related: physics.stackexchange.com/q/45653/2451 and links therein.
    $endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    12 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    A ball does not come back with exactly the same force: youtube.com/watch?v=xXXF2C-vrQE
    $endgroup$
    – StrongBad
    8 hours ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The law applies to human bodies. But the law doesn't apply to energy. It applies to force. Force isn't the same thing as energy. It isn't force that's gone missing here. It's energy. Ask where the energy went. We have conservation of energy so it's gotta be here somewhere.
    $endgroup$
    – candied_orange
    8 hours ago
















10












$begingroup$


Why doesn't a person bounce back after falling down like a ball? If we push a person and he falls down then why doesn't he come back to its initial position. Although according to Newton's 3rd law of motion: To every action there is always equal but opposite reaction. If we take the example of ball then it comes back with the same force as it falls down.But in the case of a human body, this law is not applicable. Why?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




nameera jabeen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Related: physics.stackexchange.com/q/45653/2451 and links therein.
    $endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    12 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    A ball does not come back with exactly the same force: youtube.com/watch?v=xXXF2C-vrQE
    $endgroup$
    – StrongBad
    8 hours ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The law applies to human bodies. But the law doesn't apply to energy. It applies to force. Force isn't the same thing as energy. It isn't force that's gone missing here. It's energy. Ask where the energy went. We have conservation of energy so it's gotta be here somewhere.
    $endgroup$
    – candied_orange
    8 hours ago














10












10








10





$begingroup$


Why doesn't a person bounce back after falling down like a ball? If we push a person and he falls down then why doesn't he come back to its initial position. Although according to Newton's 3rd law of motion: To every action there is always equal but opposite reaction. If we take the example of ball then it comes back with the same force as it falls down.But in the case of a human body, this law is not applicable. Why?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




nameera jabeen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




Why doesn't a person bounce back after falling down like a ball? If we push a person and he falls down then why doesn't he come back to its initial position. Although according to Newton's 3rd law of motion: To every action there is always equal but opposite reaction. If we take the example of ball then it comes back with the same force as it falls down.But in the case of a human body, this law is not applicable. Why?







newtonian-mechanics forces conservation-laws collision free-body-diagram






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




nameera jabeen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




nameera jabeen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago









Aaron Stevens

14.5k42453




14.5k42453






New contributor




nameera jabeen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 13 hours ago









nameera jabeennameera jabeen

593




593




New contributor




nameera jabeen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





nameera jabeen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






nameera jabeen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • $begingroup$
    Related: physics.stackexchange.com/q/45653/2451 and links therein.
    $endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    12 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    A ball does not come back with exactly the same force: youtube.com/watch?v=xXXF2C-vrQE
    $endgroup$
    – StrongBad
    8 hours ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The law applies to human bodies. But the law doesn't apply to energy. It applies to force. Force isn't the same thing as energy. It isn't force that's gone missing here. It's energy. Ask where the energy went. We have conservation of energy so it's gotta be here somewhere.
    $endgroup$
    – candied_orange
    8 hours ago

















  • $begingroup$
    Related: physics.stackexchange.com/q/45653/2451 and links therein.
    $endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    12 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    A ball does not come back with exactly the same force: youtube.com/watch?v=xXXF2C-vrQE
    $endgroup$
    – StrongBad
    8 hours ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The law applies to human bodies. But the law doesn't apply to energy. It applies to force. Force isn't the same thing as energy. It isn't force that's gone missing here. It's energy. Ask where the energy went. We have conservation of energy so it's gotta be here somewhere.
    $endgroup$
    – candied_orange
    8 hours ago
















$begingroup$
Related: physics.stackexchange.com/q/45653/2451 and links therein.
$endgroup$
– Qmechanic
12 hours ago




$begingroup$
Related: physics.stackexchange.com/q/45653/2451 and links therein.
$endgroup$
– Qmechanic
12 hours ago




3




3




$begingroup$
A ball does not come back with exactly the same force: youtube.com/watch?v=xXXF2C-vrQE
$endgroup$
– StrongBad
8 hours ago





$begingroup$
A ball does not come back with exactly the same force: youtube.com/watch?v=xXXF2C-vrQE
$endgroup$
– StrongBad
8 hours ago





2




2




$begingroup$
The law applies to human bodies. But the law doesn't apply to energy. It applies to force. Force isn't the same thing as energy. It isn't force that's gone missing here. It's energy. Ask where the energy went. We have conservation of energy so it's gotta be here somewhere.
$endgroup$
– candied_orange
8 hours ago





$begingroup$
The law applies to human bodies. But the law doesn't apply to energy. It applies to force. Force isn't the same thing as energy. It isn't force that's gone missing here. It's energy. Ask where the energy went. We have conservation of energy so it's gotta be here somewhere.
$endgroup$
– candied_orange
8 hours ago











3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















46












$begingroup$

Newton's third law just says when the person is hitting the floor the force the person exerts on the ground is equal to the force the ground exerts on the person. i.e. all forces are interactions.



Newton's third law does not say that all collisions are elastic, which is what you are proposing. When someone hits the floor most of the energy is absorbed by the person through deformation (as well as the floor, depending on what type of floor it is), but there is barely any rebound since people tend to not be very elastic. i.e. the deformation does not involve storing the energy to be released back into kinetic energy. Contrast this with a bouncy ball where much of the energy goes into deforming the ball, but since it is very elastic it is able to spring back and put energy back into motion. However, it is unlikely the collision is still perfectly elastic, as you seem to suggest in your question.



Your misunderstanding likely comes from the imprecise usage of the words "action" and "reaction". In this case, these words refer to just forces, not entire processes. You can get some confusing questions if you don't understand this. For example, why is it that when I open my refrigerator that my refrigerator doesn't also open me?






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 8




    $begingroup$
    Well, I can’t speak for you, but when I open my refrigerator my mouth invariably opens in return—I had always thought it was in anticipation of what is to follow, but perhaps the refrigerator had been returning the gesture after all !
    $endgroup$
    – eggyal
    10 hours ago






  • 8




    $begingroup$
    And, in fact, we cannot make persons more elastic but we can do it with the floor. In general, we call them trampolins. A person falling in a trampoline is very likely to bounce =)
    $endgroup$
    – jean
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @DavidRicherby I suppose it depends on the type of floor as well, but that is a good point. I'll make an edit.
    $endgroup$
    – Aaron Stevens
    6 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    That's deep. I'm going to tweak it and use it to sound wise. "When you take something out of the refrigerator, the refrigerator takes something out of you."
    $endgroup$
    – Lofty Withers
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    If you're going to call a trampoline a floor, I get to call a pogostick rider a person
    $endgroup$
    – Foon
    5 hours ago


















6












$begingroup$

When you body hits the floor, it does receive an equal and opposite reaction force from the floor. But unlike a ball a body is an complex object. So not all energy is transferred back as kinetic energy. Some energy is used to produce sound, some is used to deform your body... etc. I think you are confusing force with energy. Does every ball bounce back the same amount? Newton's 3rd law talks about force only. More force doesn't always(mostly) equal to more work done.



In your case if all the force was used to change the body's kinetic energy somehow(which is not realistically possible), then it would have bounced back the same amount.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    0












    $begingroup$


    If we push a person and he falls down then why doesn't he come back to its initial position. Although according to Newton's 3rd law of motion: To every action there is always equal but opposite reaction.




    That's not a correct statement of Newton's third law.



    Newton's third law of motion actually says: "If one object exerts a force on another object, then the second object also exerts a force on the first object, which is of the same magnitude but in the opposite direction."



    So in this case, what Newton's third law is saying is: "If the floor pushes up on a person with a certain amount of force, then the person pushes down on the floor with the same amount of force." From this, there's no reason to think that the person would bounce back to his initial position.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "151"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );






      nameera jabeen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f470714%2fwhy-doesnt-newtons-third-law-mean-a-person-bounces-back-to-where-they-started%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      46












      $begingroup$

      Newton's third law just says when the person is hitting the floor the force the person exerts on the ground is equal to the force the ground exerts on the person. i.e. all forces are interactions.



      Newton's third law does not say that all collisions are elastic, which is what you are proposing. When someone hits the floor most of the energy is absorbed by the person through deformation (as well as the floor, depending on what type of floor it is), but there is barely any rebound since people tend to not be very elastic. i.e. the deformation does not involve storing the energy to be released back into kinetic energy. Contrast this with a bouncy ball where much of the energy goes into deforming the ball, but since it is very elastic it is able to spring back and put energy back into motion. However, it is unlikely the collision is still perfectly elastic, as you seem to suggest in your question.



      Your misunderstanding likely comes from the imprecise usage of the words "action" and "reaction". In this case, these words refer to just forces, not entire processes. You can get some confusing questions if you don't understand this. For example, why is it that when I open my refrigerator that my refrigerator doesn't also open me?






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$








      • 8




        $begingroup$
        Well, I can’t speak for you, but when I open my refrigerator my mouth invariably opens in return—I had always thought it was in anticipation of what is to follow, but perhaps the refrigerator had been returning the gesture after all !
        $endgroup$
        – eggyal
        10 hours ago






      • 8




        $begingroup$
        And, in fact, we cannot make persons more elastic but we can do it with the floor. In general, we call them trampolins. A person falling in a trampoline is very likely to bounce =)
        $endgroup$
        – jean
        9 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        @DavidRicherby I suppose it depends on the type of floor as well, but that is a good point. I'll make an edit.
        $endgroup$
        – Aaron Stevens
        6 hours ago






      • 2




        $begingroup$
        That's deep. I'm going to tweak it and use it to sound wise. "When you take something out of the refrigerator, the refrigerator takes something out of you."
        $endgroup$
        – Lofty Withers
        5 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        If you're going to call a trampoline a floor, I get to call a pogostick rider a person
        $endgroup$
        – Foon
        5 hours ago















      46












      $begingroup$

      Newton's third law just says when the person is hitting the floor the force the person exerts on the ground is equal to the force the ground exerts on the person. i.e. all forces are interactions.



      Newton's third law does not say that all collisions are elastic, which is what you are proposing. When someone hits the floor most of the energy is absorbed by the person through deformation (as well as the floor, depending on what type of floor it is), but there is barely any rebound since people tend to not be very elastic. i.e. the deformation does not involve storing the energy to be released back into kinetic energy. Contrast this with a bouncy ball where much of the energy goes into deforming the ball, but since it is very elastic it is able to spring back and put energy back into motion. However, it is unlikely the collision is still perfectly elastic, as you seem to suggest in your question.



      Your misunderstanding likely comes from the imprecise usage of the words "action" and "reaction". In this case, these words refer to just forces, not entire processes. You can get some confusing questions if you don't understand this. For example, why is it that when I open my refrigerator that my refrigerator doesn't also open me?






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$








      • 8




        $begingroup$
        Well, I can’t speak for you, but when I open my refrigerator my mouth invariably opens in return—I had always thought it was in anticipation of what is to follow, but perhaps the refrigerator had been returning the gesture after all !
        $endgroup$
        – eggyal
        10 hours ago






      • 8




        $begingroup$
        And, in fact, we cannot make persons more elastic but we can do it with the floor. In general, we call them trampolins. A person falling in a trampoline is very likely to bounce =)
        $endgroup$
        – jean
        9 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        @DavidRicherby I suppose it depends on the type of floor as well, but that is a good point. I'll make an edit.
        $endgroup$
        – Aaron Stevens
        6 hours ago






      • 2




        $begingroup$
        That's deep. I'm going to tweak it and use it to sound wise. "When you take something out of the refrigerator, the refrigerator takes something out of you."
        $endgroup$
        – Lofty Withers
        5 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        If you're going to call a trampoline a floor, I get to call a pogostick rider a person
        $endgroup$
        – Foon
        5 hours ago













      46












      46








      46





      $begingroup$

      Newton's third law just says when the person is hitting the floor the force the person exerts on the ground is equal to the force the ground exerts on the person. i.e. all forces are interactions.



      Newton's third law does not say that all collisions are elastic, which is what you are proposing. When someone hits the floor most of the energy is absorbed by the person through deformation (as well as the floor, depending on what type of floor it is), but there is barely any rebound since people tend to not be very elastic. i.e. the deformation does not involve storing the energy to be released back into kinetic energy. Contrast this with a bouncy ball where much of the energy goes into deforming the ball, but since it is very elastic it is able to spring back and put energy back into motion. However, it is unlikely the collision is still perfectly elastic, as you seem to suggest in your question.



      Your misunderstanding likely comes from the imprecise usage of the words "action" and "reaction". In this case, these words refer to just forces, not entire processes. You can get some confusing questions if you don't understand this. For example, why is it that when I open my refrigerator that my refrigerator doesn't also open me?






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$



      Newton's third law just says when the person is hitting the floor the force the person exerts on the ground is equal to the force the ground exerts on the person. i.e. all forces are interactions.



      Newton's third law does not say that all collisions are elastic, which is what you are proposing. When someone hits the floor most of the energy is absorbed by the person through deformation (as well as the floor, depending on what type of floor it is), but there is barely any rebound since people tend to not be very elastic. i.e. the deformation does not involve storing the energy to be released back into kinetic energy. Contrast this with a bouncy ball where much of the energy goes into deforming the ball, but since it is very elastic it is able to spring back and put energy back into motion. However, it is unlikely the collision is still perfectly elastic, as you seem to suggest in your question.



      Your misunderstanding likely comes from the imprecise usage of the words "action" and "reaction". In this case, these words refer to just forces, not entire processes. You can get some confusing questions if you don't understand this. For example, why is it that when I open my refrigerator that my refrigerator doesn't also open me?







      share|cite|improve this answer














      share|cite|improve this answer



      share|cite|improve this answer








      edited 6 hours ago

























      answered 13 hours ago









      Aaron StevensAaron Stevens

      14.5k42453




      14.5k42453







      • 8




        $begingroup$
        Well, I can’t speak for you, but when I open my refrigerator my mouth invariably opens in return—I had always thought it was in anticipation of what is to follow, but perhaps the refrigerator had been returning the gesture after all !
        $endgroup$
        – eggyal
        10 hours ago






      • 8




        $begingroup$
        And, in fact, we cannot make persons more elastic but we can do it with the floor. In general, we call them trampolins. A person falling in a trampoline is very likely to bounce =)
        $endgroup$
        – jean
        9 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        @DavidRicherby I suppose it depends on the type of floor as well, but that is a good point. I'll make an edit.
        $endgroup$
        – Aaron Stevens
        6 hours ago






      • 2




        $begingroup$
        That's deep. I'm going to tweak it and use it to sound wise. "When you take something out of the refrigerator, the refrigerator takes something out of you."
        $endgroup$
        – Lofty Withers
        5 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        If you're going to call a trampoline a floor, I get to call a pogostick rider a person
        $endgroup$
        – Foon
        5 hours ago












      • 8




        $begingroup$
        Well, I can’t speak for you, but when I open my refrigerator my mouth invariably opens in return—I had always thought it was in anticipation of what is to follow, but perhaps the refrigerator had been returning the gesture after all !
        $endgroup$
        – eggyal
        10 hours ago






      • 8




        $begingroup$
        And, in fact, we cannot make persons more elastic but we can do it with the floor. In general, we call them trampolins. A person falling in a trampoline is very likely to bounce =)
        $endgroup$
        – jean
        9 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        @DavidRicherby I suppose it depends on the type of floor as well, but that is a good point. I'll make an edit.
        $endgroup$
        – Aaron Stevens
        6 hours ago






      • 2




        $begingroup$
        That's deep. I'm going to tweak it and use it to sound wise. "When you take something out of the refrigerator, the refrigerator takes something out of you."
        $endgroup$
        – Lofty Withers
        5 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        If you're going to call a trampoline a floor, I get to call a pogostick rider a person
        $endgroup$
        – Foon
        5 hours ago







      8




      8




      $begingroup$
      Well, I can’t speak for you, but when I open my refrigerator my mouth invariably opens in return—I had always thought it was in anticipation of what is to follow, but perhaps the refrigerator had been returning the gesture after all !
      $endgroup$
      – eggyal
      10 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      Well, I can’t speak for you, but when I open my refrigerator my mouth invariably opens in return—I had always thought it was in anticipation of what is to follow, but perhaps the refrigerator had been returning the gesture after all !
      $endgroup$
      – eggyal
      10 hours ago




      8




      8




      $begingroup$
      And, in fact, we cannot make persons more elastic but we can do it with the floor. In general, we call them trampolins. A person falling in a trampoline is very likely to bounce =)
      $endgroup$
      – jean
      9 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      And, in fact, we cannot make persons more elastic but we can do it with the floor. In general, we call them trampolins. A person falling in a trampoline is very likely to bounce =)
      $endgroup$
      – jean
      9 hours ago












      $begingroup$
      @DavidRicherby I suppose it depends on the type of floor as well, but that is a good point. I'll make an edit.
      $endgroup$
      – Aaron Stevens
      6 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      @DavidRicherby I suppose it depends on the type of floor as well, but that is a good point. I'll make an edit.
      $endgroup$
      – Aaron Stevens
      6 hours ago




      2




      2




      $begingroup$
      That's deep. I'm going to tweak it and use it to sound wise. "When you take something out of the refrigerator, the refrigerator takes something out of you."
      $endgroup$
      – Lofty Withers
      5 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      That's deep. I'm going to tweak it and use it to sound wise. "When you take something out of the refrigerator, the refrigerator takes something out of you."
      $endgroup$
      – Lofty Withers
      5 hours ago












      $begingroup$
      If you're going to call a trampoline a floor, I get to call a pogostick rider a person
      $endgroup$
      – Foon
      5 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      If you're going to call a trampoline a floor, I get to call a pogostick rider a person
      $endgroup$
      – Foon
      5 hours ago











      6












      $begingroup$

      When you body hits the floor, it does receive an equal and opposite reaction force from the floor. But unlike a ball a body is an complex object. So not all energy is transferred back as kinetic energy. Some energy is used to produce sound, some is used to deform your body... etc. I think you are confusing force with energy. Does every ball bounce back the same amount? Newton's 3rd law talks about force only. More force doesn't always(mostly) equal to more work done.



      In your case if all the force was used to change the body's kinetic energy somehow(which is not realistically possible), then it would have bounced back the same amount.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$

















        6












        $begingroup$

        When you body hits the floor, it does receive an equal and opposite reaction force from the floor. But unlike a ball a body is an complex object. So not all energy is transferred back as kinetic energy. Some energy is used to produce sound, some is used to deform your body... etc. I think you are confusing force with energy. Does every ball bounce back the same amount? Newton's 3rd law talks about force only. More force doesn't always(mostly) equal to more work done.



        In your case if all the force was used to change the body's kinetic energy somehow(which is not realistically possible), then it would have bounced back the same amount.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$















          6












          6








          6





          $begingroup$

          When you body hits the floor, it does receive an equal and opposite reaction force from the floor. But unlike a ball a body is an complex object. So not all energy is transferred back as kinetic energy. Some energy is used to produce sound, some is used to deform your body... etc. I think you are confusing force with energy. Does every ball bounce back the same amount? Newton's 3rd law talks about force only. More force doesn't always(mostly) equal to more work done.



          In your case if all the force was used to change the body's kinetic energy somehow(which is not realistically possible), then it would have bounced back the same amount.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          When you body hits the floor, it does receive an equal and opposite reaction force from the floor. But unlike a ball a body is an complex object. So not all energy is transferred back as kinetic energy. Some energy is used to produce sound, some is used to deform your body... etc. I think you are confusing force with energy. Does every ball bounce back the same amount? Newton's 3rd law talks about force only. More force doesn't always(mostly) equal to more work done.



          In your case if all the force was used to change the body's kinetic energy somehow(which is not realistically possible), then it would have bounced back the same amount.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 12 hours ago









          LikhonLikhon

          1069




          1069





















              0












              $begingroup$


              If we push a person and he falls down then why doesn't he come back to its initial position. Although according to Newton's 3rd law of motion: To every action there is always equal but opposite reaction.




              That's not a correct statement of Newton's third law.



              Newton's third law of motion actually says: "If one object exerts a force on another object, then the second object also exerts a force on the first object, which is of the same magnitude but in the opposite direction."



              So in this case, what Newton's third law is saying is: "If the floor pushes up on a person with a certain amount of force, then the person pushes down on the floor with the same amount of force." From this, there's no reason to think that the person would bounce back to his initial position.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                0












                $begingroup$


                If we push a person and he falls down then why doesn't he come back to its initial position. Although according to Newton's 3rd law of motion: To every action there is always equal but opposite reaction.




                That's not a correct statement of Newton's third law.



                Newton's third law of motion actually says: "If one object exerts a force on another object, then the second object also exerts a force on the first object, which is of the same magnitude but in the opposite direction."



                So in this case, what Newton's third law is saying is: "If the floor pushes up on a person with a certain amount of force, then the person pushes down on the floor with the same amount of force." From this, there's no reason to think that the person would bounce back to his initial position.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$


                  If we push a person and he falls down then why doesn't he come back to its initial position. Although according to Newton's 3rd law of motion: To every action there is always equal but opposite reaction.




                  That's not a correct statement of Newton's third law.



                  Newton's third law of motion actually says: "If one object exerts a force on another object, then the second object also exerts a force on the first object, which is of the same magnitude but in the opposite direction."



                  So in this case, what Newton's third law is saying is: "If the floor pushes up on a person with a certain amount of force, then the person pushes down on the floor with the same amount of force." From this, there's no reason to think that the person would bounce back to his initial position.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$




                  If we push a person and he falls down then why doesn't he come back to its initial position. Although according to Newton's 3rd law of motion: To every action there is always equal but opposite reaction.




                  That's not a correct statement of Newton's third law.



                  Newton's third law of motion actually says: "If one object exerts a force on another object, then the second object also exerts a force on the first object, which is of the same magnitude but in the opposite direction."



                  So in this case, what Newton's third law is saying is: "If the floor pushes up on a person with a certain amount of force, then the person pushes down on the floor with the same amount of force." From this, there's no reason to think that the person would bounce back to his initial position.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 4 hours ago









                  Tanner SwettTanner Swett

                  1518




                  1518




















                      nameera jabeen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      nameera jabeen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      nameera jabeen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                      nameera jabeen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f470714%2fwhy-doesnt-newtons-third-law-mean-a-person-bounces-back-to-where-they-started%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Reverse int within the 32-bit signed integer range: [−2^31, 2^31 − 1]Combining two 32-bit integers into one 64-bit integerDetermine if an int is within rangeLossy packing 32 bit integer to 16 bitComputing the square root of a 64-bit integerKeeping integer addition within boundsSafe multiplication of two 64-bit signed integersLeetcode 10: Regular Expression MatchingSigned integer-to-ascii x86_64 assembler macroReverse the digits of an Integer“Add two numbers given in reverse order from a linked list”

                      Category:Fedor von Bock Media in category "Fedor von Bock"Navigation menuUpload mediaISNI: 0000 0000 5511 3417VIAF ID: 24712551GND ID: 119294796Library of Congress authority ID: n96068363BnF ID: 12534305fSUDOC authorities ID: 034604189Open Library ID: OL338253ANKCR AUT ID: jn19990000869National Library of Israel ID: 000514068National Thesaurus for Author Names ID: 341574317ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

                      Kiel Indholdsfortegnelse Historie | Transport og færgeforbindelser | Sejlsport og anden sport | Kultur | Kendte personer fra Kiel | Noter | Litteratur | Eksterne henvisninger | Navigationsmenuwww.kiel.de54°19′31″N 10°8′26″Ø / 54.32528°N 10.14056°Ø / 54.32528; 10.14056Oberbürgermeister Dr. Ulf Kämpferwww.statistik-nord.deDen danske Stats StatistikKiels hjemmesiderrrWorldCat312794080n790547494030481-4