Assassin's bullet with mercuryEnergy based artillery style weapons?Semiliquid atmosphere - Is my premise/conclusions correct; and will it get the result I want?Culture and law if humans evolved with the ability to manipulate the four classical elements (to an extent)?Sword with mercury coreRealistic fantasy slimesWhat conditions would support mercury as bodily fluid?Making a slow orbit around a large gas giantCreating a steampunk-esque/cybernetic “Big Iron” revolverCan biological material be magnetic?Modern-day genetically engineered monsters – what's possible?

Probability that a draw from a normal distribution is some number greater than another draw from the same distribution

How to compactly explain secondary and tertiary characters without resorting to stereotypes?

Is "remove commented out code" correct English?

Extract rows of a table, that include less than x NULLs

Why didn't Miles's spider sense work before?

Calculating entropy change: reversible vs irreversible process

pgfplots: How to draw exponential graph with 60° start angle?

How badly should I try to prevent a user from XSSing themselves?

Question about the derivation of the intensity formula of a diffraction grating

Mathematica command that allows it to read my intentions

Why would the Red Woman birth a shadow if she worshipped the Lord of the Light?

Why do bosons tend to occupy the same state?

How do conventional missiles fly?

How would I stat a creature to be immune to everything but the Magic Missile spell? (just for fun)

What's the in-universe reasoning behind sorcerers needing material components?

Is there an expression that means doing something right before you will need it rather than doing it in case you might need it?

What mechanic is there to disable a threat instead of killing it?

If human space travel is limited by the G force vulnerability, is there a way to counter G forces?

Can compressed videos be decoded back to their uncompresed original format?

Would Slavery Reparations be considered Bills of Attainder and hence Illegal?

What are some good books on Machine Learning and AI like Krugman, Wells and Graddy's "Essentials of Economics"

How dangerous is XSS?

Does the Idaho Potato Commission associate potato skins with healthy eating?

Replacing legend item names in Carto VL



Assassin's bullet with mercury


Energy based artillery style weapons?Semiliquid atmosphere - Is my premise/conclusions correct; and will it get the result I want?Culture and law if humans evolved with the ability to manipulate the four classical elements (to an extent)?Sword with mercury coreRealistic fantasy slimesWhat conditions would support mercury as bodily fluid?Making a slow orbit around a large gas giantCreating a steampunk-esque/cybernetic “Big Iron” revolverCan biological material be magnetic?Modern-day genetically engineered monsters – what's possible?













3












$begingroup$


This is something I have been wondering: if an assassin wanted to kill their target with a bullet from a sniper rifle, can they dip it in liquid mercury so even if the bullet itself doesn't kill them, the mercury poisoning will? I am looking for scientific basis on how it could be feasible, if it is at all.



And in case you're wondering: No, I'm not planning to assassinate somebody.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Yay, we just got moved up the FBI, CIA, etc. watchlists again.
    $endgroup$
    – Gryphon
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    quora.com/Will-adding-mercury-to-bullets-increase-the-fatality
    $endgroup$
    – nzaman
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Mercury bullets are stupid. Turns out though, that sodium and potassium bullets are awesome: youtube.com/watch?v=T85d7ST2yxU
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Now I have to ask, could you use dioxygen difluoride to increase the lethality of a bullet?
    $endgroup$
    – Sievert
    45 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    As many have indicated, no. Mercury is actually a slow killer. Have you ever heard the phrase, "mad as a hatter?" It came from the 1700s when hat makers in Europe used mercury during the hat making process and long-term exposure made people bonkers - and sometimes killed them. But it takes regular exposure for a long time to do that. Fish are harvested with mercury in them - alive, not dead. Mercury poisoning is a problem, but the environmental hype exceeds Mercury's abilities. Now, a hollow-tip like Zeiss suggests with a Curare core.... That would work.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    18 mins ago















3












$begingroup$


This is something I have been wondering: if an assassin wanted to kill their target with a bullet from a sniper rifle, can they dip it in liquid mercury so even if the bullet itself doesn't kill them, the mercury poisoning will? I am looking for scientific basis on how it could be feasible, if it is at all.



And in case you're wondering: No, I'm not planning to assassinate somebody.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Yay, we just got moved up the FBI, CIA, etc. watchlists again.
    $endgroup$
    – Gryphon
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    quora.com/Will-adding-mercury-to-bullets-increase-the-fatality
    $endgroup$
    – nzaman
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Mercury bullets are stupid. Turns out though, that sodium and potassium bullets are awesome: youtube.com/watch?v=T85d7ST2yxU
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Now I have to ask, could you use dioxygen difluoride to increase the lethality of a bullet?
    $endgroup$
    – Sievert
    45 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    As many have indicated, no. Mercury is actually a slow killer. Have you ever heard the phrase, "mad as a hatter?" It came from the 1700s when hat makers in Europe used mercury during the hat making process and long-term exposure made people bonkers - and sometimes killed them. But it takes regular exposure for a long time to do that. Fish are harvested with mercury in them - alive, not dead. Mercury poisoning is a problem, but the environmental hype exceeds Mercury's abilities. Now, a hollow-tip like Zeiss suggests with a Curare core.... That would work.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    18 mins ago













3












3








3





$begingroup$


This is something I have been wondering: if an assassin wanted to kill their target with a bullet from a sniper rifle, can they dip it in liquid mercury so even if the bullet itself doesn't kill them, the mercury poisoning will? I am looking for scientific basis on how it could be feasible, if it is at all.



And in case you're wondering: No, I'm not planning to assassinate somebody.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




This is something I have been wondering: if an assassin wanted to kill their target with a bullet from a sniper rifle, can they dip it in liquid mercury so even if the bullet itself doesn't kill them, the mercury poisoning will? I am looking for scientific basis on how it could be feasible, if it is at all.



And in case you're wondering: No, I'm not planning to assassinate somebody.







science-based chemistry assassination






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 3 hours ago









Nathan HoppNathan Hopp

2611210




2611210







  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Yay, we just got moved up the FBI, CIA, etc. watchlists again.
    $endgroup$
    – Gryphon
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    quora.com/Will-adding-mercury-to-bullets-increase-the-fatality
    $endgroup$
    – nzaman
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Mercury bullets are stupid. Turns out though, that sodium and potassium bullets are awesome: youtube.com/watch?v=T85d7ST2yxU
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Now I have to ask, could you use dioxygen difluoride to increase the lethality of a bullet?
    $endgroup$
    – Sievert
    45 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    As many have indicated, no. Mercury is actually a slow killer. Have you ever heard the phrase, "mad as a hatter?" It came from the 1700s when hat makers in Europe used mercury during the hat making process and long-term exposure made people bonkers - and sometimes killed them. But it takes regular exposure for a long time to do that. Fish are harvested with mercury in them - alive, not dead. Mercury poisoning is a problem, but the environmental hype exceeds Mercury's abilities. Now, a hollow-tip like Zeiss suggests with a Curare core.... That would work.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    18 mins ago












  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Yay, we just got moved up the FBI, CIA, etc. watchlists again.
    $endgroup$
    – Gryphon
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    quora.com/Will-adding-mercury-to-bullets-increase-the-fatality
    $endgroup$
    – nzaman
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Mercury bullets are stupid. Turns out though, that sodium and potassium bullets are awesome: youtube.com/watch?v=T85d7ST2yxU
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Now I have to ask, could you use dioxygen difluoride to increase the lethality of a bullet?
    $endgroup$
    – Sievert
    45 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    As many have indicated, no. Mercury is actually a slow killer. Have you ever heard the phrase, "mad as a hatter?" It came from the 1700s when hat makers in Europe used mercury during the hat making process and long-term exposure made people bonkers - and sometimes killed them. But it takes regular exposure for a long time to do that. Fish are harvested with mercury in them - alive, not dead. Mercury poisoning is a problem, but the environmental hype exceeds Mercury's abilities. Now, a hollow-tip like Zeiss suggests with a Curare core.... That would work.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    18 mins ago







5




5




$begingroup$
Yay, we just got moved up the FBI, CIA, etc. watchlists again.
$endgroup$
– Gryphon
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
Yay, we just got moved up the FBI, CIA, etc. watchlists again.
$endgroup$
– Gryphon
3 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
quora.com/Will-adding-mercury-to-bullets-increase-the-fatality
$endgroup$
– nzaman
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
quora.com/Will-adding-mercury-to-bullets-increase-the-fatality
$endgroup$
– nzaman
3 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Mercury bullets are stupid. Turns out though, that sodium and potassium bullets are awesome: youtube.com/watch?v=T85d7ST2yxU
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
Mercury bullets are stupid. Turns out though, that sodium and potassium bullets are awesome: youtube.com/watch?v=T85d7ST2yxU
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
1 hour ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Now I have to ask, could you use dioxygen difluoride to increase the lethality of a bullet?
$endgroup$
– Sievert
45 mins ago




$begingroup$
Now I have to ask, could you use dioxygen difluoride to increase the lethality of a bullet?
$endgroup$
– Sievert
45 mins ago












$begingroup$
As many have indicated, no. Mercury is actually a slow killer. Have you ever heard the phrase, "mad as a hatter?" It came from the 1700s when hat makers in Europe used mercury during the hat making process and long-term exposure made people bonkers - and sometimes killed them. But it takes regular exposure for a long time to do that. Fish are harvested with mercury in them - alive, not dead. Mercury poisoning is a problem, but the environmental hype exceeds Mercury's abilities. Now, a hollow-tip like Zeiss suggests with a Curare core.... That would work.
$endgroup$
– JBH
18 mins ago




$begingroup$
As many have indicated, no. Mercury is actually a slow killer. Have you ever heard the phrase, "mad as a hatter?" It came from the 1700s when hat makers in Europe used mercury during the hat making process and long-term exposure made people bonkers - and sometimes killed them. But it takes regular exposure for a long time to do that. Fish are harvested with mercury in them - alive, not dead. Mercury poisoning is a problem, but the environmental hype exceeds Mercury's abilities. Now, a hollow-tip like Zeiss suggests with a Curare core.... That would work.
$endgroup$
– JBH
18 mins ago










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

No.



If we just dip the bullet, only trace amounts of mercury will remain on the bullet. That's definitely won't worth the effort.



If we give lead bullet a longer treat with mercury, an amalgam will form. This would adversely affect ballistics. Additionally, amalgam bullet will be likely removed by subsequent surgery, so the efforts would be wasted.



If we enclose mercury in a hollow bullet, that might work - but still would be messy and much less effective than cyanide, for example.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    5












    $begingroup$

    Mercury has, in the real world, been used to increase the terminal effect of hollow point bullets (especially a the relatively low velocity of pistol bullets). In essence, a short time before firing (so as not to have all the mercury amalgamated with the lead, but some liquid still left at firing) a conventional hollow point is filled with mercury. It was common to press a small caliber gas check (a soft metal disk of precise diameter, with a raised edge) into the hollow point to keep the mercury in place.



    On impact, the liquid in the hollow point magnified the hydraulic effect, leading to much stronger and faster expansion of the bullet. The mercury itself was chemically insignificant; it was the expansion effect that was sought. Worth noting here that my source (an article in a gun/reloading publication, but I don't recall which, much less what 1970s vintage issue) also found that the effect was essentially the same using water or oil; any difference between mercury and water being attributable to the greater increase in bullet weight.



    Most who use guns for defense now consider penetration more important than expansion, so mercury tip bullets (which have long been legally prohibited as "toxic", however erroneously) are no longer widely considered an effective modification.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Citation needed. I'm pretty certain it has always been a fictional device, with no practical real world implementation. Mercury tipped bullets will, at best, be no better than the normal kind.
      $endgroup$
      – Starfish Prime
      2 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Can't give a citation. I read about this in a gun/reloading source, an article with a "mythbusting" attitude, which showed that yes, there was a definite effect of increasing expansion -- but it was in the 1970s, when hollow points were the rage and those who advocated penetration were largely ignored, at least in the press, and after forty-some years, I don't recall the source. The same article, as I recall, showed that the same effect was obtainable without legal issues using vegetable oil or plain water.
      $endgroup$
      – Zeiss Ikon
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      I'm sure that water or oil will have the same effect, to wit: nothing. I'll bet you a beer that you can't find any evidence of mercury bullets being shown to be better than regular expanding rounds. Unless you're in Norway or something, in which case I'll bet you like a shot of beer.
      $endgroup$
      – Starfish Prime
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      Also worth remembering that bullet design has advanced some over the past four decades. A hollow point that would reliably expand at .380 velocity didn't exist when I learned to reload -- they became available in the mid-1980s. Now they make them for .25 ACP, but everyone wants penetration (fourteen inches!) instead.
      $endgroup$
      – Zeiss Ikon
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      I did find a video of an NaK-filled bullet being used. The alloy is liquid at room temperature. It was shot at very close range (probably a necessity to ensure it actually reached the target) and doesn't appear to be noticably better at expansion than potassium which is merely very soft. Note that in all the cases, the bullet isn't "tipped" so much as the jacket being completely emptied of lead and refilled.
      $endgroup$
      – Starfish Prime
      1 hour ago


















    1












    $begingroup$

    No.



    Not even in the form of dimethylmercury.



    This extremely nasty organic compound was being carefully used by professional toxic metal researcher Karen Wetterhahn when a few small drops of it touched the outside of her latex gloves. At the time it was not known that this noxious substance could travel through latex. Nothing could be done, she died less than a year later.



    To make enough stick to a (hot - >100 celsius) bullet in flight, because it would otherwise evaporate before reaching your target, dipping the bullet would not work, you'd need some water soluble delivery system which releases after impact which would not satisfy the requirements of the question - but careful how your protagonist uses it, lest they succumb the same way.



    Edited due to being wrong all over.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      How hot do bullets get when fired?. TL;DR: at least 100 degrees Celsius, above the boiling point of dimethylmercury.
      $endgroup$
      – Brythan
      1 hour ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I guess you could drill a hole in the end of the bullet, fill it with the noxious substance and then plug it with something like epoxy. A few tests with dye and ballistic gel would confirm whether it's effective or not.
      $endgroup$
      – Spehro Pefhany
      22 mins ago



















    0












    $begingroup$

    Lead is already poisonous, the addition of mercury might be unnecessary if looking to increase the poisoning potential of a bullet. Instead, I would consider using toxin from poison dart frogs in the bullets.



    This toxin is highly lethal to most creatures, including humans, and was used by aboriginal tribes in the rain forest. They coated darts with this poison (likely where the frogs got their name from) and used a blowgun to inject a person with it.



    You could employ a similar mechanism with your bullets, either coating them in poison or putting the poison into a specialised bullet meant for storing the liquid and releasing it upon impact. If you really wanted to use mercury though, you could fill the bullet with that instead.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$




















      -1












      $begingroup$

      Mercury



      Mercury when ingested targets blood, kidneys, central nervous system, liver and the brain. Large doses of Mercury will lead to easily identifiable health symptoms Administration of a chelating agent can help reduce the effects on the body.



      Acute Mercury poisoning will lead to death, but generally that death will be due to an already existing kidney or liver damage. There is always the possibility that exposure will cause a failure of the central nervous system, which could lead to death.



      In essence, that big new hole in the body from he gunshot wound will be far more fatal either from tissue damage or a secondary infection. But adding the Mercury sure will make your victim uncomfortable until the body sheds the excess amount down to acceptable levels.



      • https://fscimage.fishersci.com/msds/96252.htm





      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$












      • $begingroup$
        Metallic mercury doesn't form soluble compounds easily. if the mercury isn't already in an organic compound form, it's not noticeably worse than lead -- and contrary to popular fiction, bullets are usually left in the body, because removing them will do more harm than leaving them will.
        $endgroup$
        – Zeiss Ikon
        2 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        @ZeissIkon Surely that seems counter-productive though? Would someone not get lead-poisioning by leaving that bullet inside their body for years? I know that sharp objects that enter the body are usually left in before being removed by medical professionals to prevent further bleeding. I’ve seen vets remove shotgun pellets from a dog before so i am unsure if a doctor would leave a bullet in a human, or at least if that is standard practice.
        $endgroup$
        – Liam Morris
        2 hours ago






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        The body "encysts" foreign objects in scar tissue, which insulates the lead bullet from body fluids. The only time bullets are routinely removed if if they're in a location where friction from movement will break down the cyst, or if they're in a location where there's risk of the bullet moving in a harmful way (in the brain, immediately by the spinal cord or aorta, for instance).
        $endgroup$
        – Zeiss Ikon
        1 hour ago










      • $begingroup$
        @ZeissIkon Oh right, i did not know this. I thought that, just by being in the body, the lead would permeate through the skin and cause lead poisoning that way. I would also assume that, if it were possible to easily remove the bullet (such as if it was not burried too deep) a doctor would prefer to do that than leave it in.
        $endgroup$
        – Liam Morris
        50 mins ago











      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "579"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143138%2fassassins-bullet-with-mercury%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes








      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      5












      $begingroup$

      No.



      If we just dip the bullet, only trace amounts of mercury will remain on the bullet. That's definitely won't worth the effort.



      If we give lead bullet a longer treat with mercury, an amalgam will form. This would adversely affect ballistics. Additionally, amalgam bullet will be likely removed by subsequent surgery, so the efforts would be wasted.



      If we enclose mercury in a hollow bullet, that might work - but still would be messy and much less effective than cyanide, for example.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$

















        5












        $begingroup$

        No.



        If we just dip the bullet, only trace amounts of mercury will remain on the bullet. That's definitely won't worth the effort.



        If we give lead bullet a longer treat with mercury, an amalgam will form. This would adversely affect ballistics. Additionally, amalgam bullet will be likely removed by subsequent surgery, so the efforts would be wasted.



        If we enclose mercury in a hollow bullet, that might work - but still would be messy and much less effective than cyanide, for example.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$















          5












          5








          5





          $begingroup$

          No.



          If we just dip the bullet, only trace amounts of mercury will remain on the bullet. That's definitely won't worth the effort.



          If we give lead bullet a longer treat with mercury, an amalgam will form. This would adversely affect ballistics. Additionally, amalgam bullet will be likely removed by subsequent surgery, so the efforts would be wasted.



          If we enclose mercury in a hollow bullet, that might work - but still would be messy and much less effective than cyanide, for example.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          No.



          If we just dip the bullet, only trace amounts of mercury will remain on the bullet. That's definitely won't worth the effort.



          If we give lead bullet a longer treat with mercury, an amalgam will form. This would adversely affect ballistics. Additionally, amalgam bullet will be likely removed by subsequent surgery, so the efforts would be wasted.



          If we enclose mercury in a hollow bullet, that might work - but still would be messy and much less effective than cyanide, for example.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 2 hours ago









          AlexanderAlexander

          21.7k53485




          21.7k53485





















              5












              $begingroup$

              Mercury has, in the real world, been used to increase the terminal effect of hollow point bullets (especially a the relatively low velocity of pistol bullets). In essence, a short time before firing (so as not to have all the mercury amalgamated with the lead, but some liquid still left at firing) a conventional hollow point is filled with mercury. It was common to press a small caliber gas check (a soft metal disk of precise diameter, with a raised edge) into the hollow point to keep the mercury in place.



              On impact, the liquid in the hollow point magnified the hydraulic effect, leading to much stronger and faster expansion of the bullet. The mercury itself was chemically insignificant; it was the expansion effect that was sought. Worth noting here that my source (an article in a gun/reloading publication, but I don't recall which, much less what 1970s vintage issue) also found that the effect was essentially the same using water or oil; any difference between mercury and water being attributable to the greater increase in bullet weight.



              Most who use guns for defense now consider penetration more important than expansion, so mercury tip bullets (which have long been legally prohibited as "toxic", however erroneously) are no longer widely considered an effective modification.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$








              • 1




                $begingroup$
                Citation needed. I'm pretty certain it has always been a fictional device, with no practical real world implementation. Mercury tipped bullets will, at best, be no better than the normal kind.
                $endgroup$
                – Starfish Prime
                2 hours ago










              • $begingroup$
                Can't give a citation. I read about this in a gun/reloading source, an article with a "mythbusting" attitude, which showed that yes, there was a definite effect of increasing expansion -- but it was in the 1970s, when hollow points were the rage and those who advocated penetration were largely ignored, at least in the press, and after forty-some years, I don't recall the source. The same article, as I recall, showed that the same effect was obtainable without legal issues using vegetable oil or plain water.
                $endgroup$
                – Zeiss Ikon
                1 hour ago










              • $begingroup$
                I'm sure that water or oil will have the same effect, to wit: nothing. I'll bet you a beer that you can't find any evidence of mercury bullets being shown to be better than regular expanding rounds. Unless you're in Norway or something, in which case I'll bet you like a shot of beer.
                $endgroup$
                – Starfish Prime
                1 hour ago










              • $begingroup$
                Also worth remembering that bullet design has advanced some over the past four decades. A hollow point that would reliably expand at .380 velocity didn't exist when I learned to reload -- they became available in the mid-1980s. Now they make them for .25 ACP, but everyone wants penetration (fourteen inches!) instead.
                $endgroup$
                – Zeiss Ikon
                1 hour ago










              • $begingroup$
                I did find a video of an NaK-filled bullet being used. The alloy is liquid at room temperature. It was shot at very close range (probably a necessity to ensure it actually reached the target) and doesn't appear to be noticably better at expansion than potassium which is merely very soft. Note that in all the cases, the bullet isn't "tipped" so much as the jacket being completely emptied of lead and refilled.
                $endgroup$
                – Starfish Prime
                1 hour ago















              5












              $begingroup$

              Mercury has, in the real world, been used to increase the terminal effect of hollow point bullets (especially a the relatively low velocity of pistol bullets). In essence, a short time before firing (so as not to have all the mercury amalgamated with the lead, but some liquid still left at firing) a conventional hollow point is filled with mercury. It was common to press a small caliber gas check (a soft metal disk of precise diameter, with a raised edge) into the hollow point to keep the mercury in place.



              On impact, the liquid in the hollow point magnified the hydraulic effect, leading to much stronger and faster expansion of the bullet. The mercury itself was chemically insignificant; it was the expansion effect that was sought. Worth noting here that my source (an article in a gun/reloading publication, but I don't recall which, much less what 1970s vintage issue) also found that the effect was essentially the same using water or oil; any difference between mercury and water being attributable to the greater increase in bullet weight.



              Most who use guns for defense now consider penetration more important than expansion, so mercury tip bullets (which have long been legally prohibited as "toxic", however erroneously) are no longer widely considered an effective modification.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$








              • 1




                $begingroup$
                Citation needed. I'm pretty certain it has always been a fictional device, with no practical real world implementation. Mercury tipped bullets will, at best, be no better than the normal kind.
                $endgroup$
                – Starfish Prime
                2 hours ago










              • $begingroup$
                Can't give a citation. I read about this in a gun/reloading source, an article with a "mythbusting" attitude, which showed that yes, there was a definite effect of increasing expansion -- but it was in the 1970s, when hollow points were the rage and those who advocated penetration were largely ignored, at least in the press, and after forty-some years, I don't recall the source. The same article, as I recall, showed that the same effect was obtainable without legal issues using vegetable oil or plain water.
                $endgroup$
                – Zeiss Ikon
                1 hour ago










              • $begingroup$
                I'm sure that water or oil will have the same effect, to wit: nothing. I'll bet you a beer that you can't find any evidence of mercury bullets being shown to be better than regular expanding rounds. Unless you're in Norway or something, in which case I'll bet you like a shot of beer.
                $endgroup$
                – Starfish Prime
                1 hour ago










              • $begingroup$
                Also worth remembering that bullet design has advanced some over the past four decades. A hollow point that would reliably expand at .380 velocity didn't exist when I learned to reload -- they became available in the mid-1980s. Now they make them for .25 ACP, but everyone wants penetration (fourteen inches!) instead.
                $endgroup$
                – Zeiss Ikon
                1 hour ago










              • $begingroup$
                I did find a video of an NaK-filled bullet being used. The alloy is liquid at room temperature. It was shot at very close range (probably a necessity to ensure it actually reached the target) and doesn't appear to be noticably better at expansion than potassium which is merely very soft. Note that in all the cases, the bullet isn't "tipped" so much as the jacket being completely emptied of lead and refilled.
                $endgroup$
                – Starfish Prime
                1 hour ago













              5












              5








              5





              $begingroup$

              Mercury has, in the real world, been used to increase the terminal effect of hollow point bullets (especially a the relatively low velocity of pistol bullets). In essence, a short time before firing (so as not to have all the mercury amalgamated with the lead, but some liquid still left at firing) a conventional hollow point is filled with mercury. It was common to press a small caliber gas check (a soft metal disk of precise diameter, with a raised edge) into the hollow point to keep the mercury in place.



              On impact, the liquid in the hollow point magnified the hydraulic effect, leading to much stronger and faster expansion of the bullet. The mercury itself was chemically insignificant; it was the expansion effect that was sought. Worth noting here that my source (an article in a gun/reloading publication, but I don't recall which, much less what 1970s vintage issue) also found that the effect was essentially the same using water or oil; any difference between mercury and water being attributable to the greater increase in bullet weight.



              Most who use guns for defense now consider penetration more important than expansion, so mercury tip bullets (which have long been legally prohibited as "toxic", however erroneously) are no longer widely considered an effective modification.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$



              Mercury has, in the real world, been used to increase the terminal effect of hollow point bullets (especially a the relatively low velocity of pistol bullets). In essence, a short time before firing (so as not to have all the mercury amalgamated with the lead, but some liquid still left at firing) a conventional hollow point is filled with mercury. It was common to press a small caliber gas check (a soft metal disk of precise diameter, with a raised edge) into the hollow point to keep the mercury in place.



              On impact, the liquid in the hollow point magnified the hydraulic effect, leading to much stronger and faster expansion of the bullet. The mercury itself was chemically insignificant; it was the expansion effect that was sought. Worth noting here that my source (an article in a gun/reloading publication, but I don't recall which, much less what 1970s vintage issue) also found that the effect was essentially the same using water or oil; any difference between mercury and water being attributable to the greater increase in bullet weight.



              Most who use guns for defense now consider penetration more important than expansion, so mercury tip bullets (which have long been legally prohibited as "toxic", however erroneously) are no longer widely considered an effective modification.







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited 1 hour ago









              Brythan

              20.9k74286




              20.9k74286










              answered 2 hours ago









              Zeiss IkonZeiss Ikon

              2,286116




              2,286116







              • 1




                $begingroup$
                Citation needed. I'm pretty certain it has always been a fictional device, with no practical real world implementation. Mercury tipped bullets will, at best, be no better than the normal kind.
                $endgroup$
                – Starfish Prime
                2 hours ago










              • $begingroup$
                Can't give a citation. I read about this in a gun/reloading source, an article with a "mythbusting" attitude, which showed that yes, there was a definite effect of increasing expansion -- but it was in the 1970s, when hollow points were the rage and those who advocated penetration were largely ignored, at least in the press, and after forty-some years, I don't recall the source. The same article, as I recall, showed that the same effect was obtainable without legal issues using vegetable oil or plain water.
                $endgroup$
                – Zeiss Ikon
                1 hour ago










              • $begingroup$
                I'm sure that water or oil will have the same effect, to wit: nothing. I'll bet you a beer that you can't find any evidence of mercury bullets being shown to be better than regular expanding rounds. Unless you're in Norway or something, in which case I'll bet you like a shot of beer.
                $endgroup$
                – Starfish Prime
                1 hour ago










              • $begingroup$
                Also worth remembering that bullet design has advanced some over the past four decades. A hollow point that would reliably expand at .380 velocity didn't exist when I learned to reload -- they became available in the mid-1980s. Now they make them for .25 ACP, but everyone wants penetration (fourteen inches!) instead.
                $endgroup$
                – Zeiss Ikon
                1 hour ago










              • $begingroup$
                I did find a video of an NaK-filled bullet being used. The alloy is liquid at room temperature. It was shot at very close range (probably a necessity to ensure it actually reached the target) and doesn't appear to be noticably better at expansion than potassium which is merely very soft. Note that in all the cases, the bullet isn't "tipped" so much as the jacket being completely emptied of lead and refilled.
                $endgroup$
                – Starfish Prime
                1 hour ago












              • 1




                $begingroup$
                Citation needed. I'm pretty certain it has always been a fictional device, with no practical real world implementation. Mercury tipped bullets will, at best, be no better than the normal kind.
                $endgroup$
                – Starfish Prime
                2 hours ago










              • $begingroup$
                Can't give a citation. I read about this in a gun/reloading source, an article with a "mythbusting" attitude, which showed that yes, there was a definite effect of increasing expansion -- but it was in the 1970s, when hollow points were the rage and those who advocated penetration were largely ignored, at least in the press, and after forty-some years, I don't recall the source. The same article, as I recall, showed that the same effect was obtainable without legal issues using vegetable oil or plain water.
                $endgroup$
                – Zeiss Ikon
                1 hour ago










              • $begingroup$
                I'm sure that water or oil will have the same effect, to wit: nothing. I'll bet you a beer that you can't find any evidence of mercury bullets being shown to be better than regular expanding rounds. Unless you're in Norway or something, in which case I'll bet you like a shot of beer.
                $endgroup$
                – Starfish Prime
                1 hour ago










              • $begingroup$
                Also worth remembering that bullet design has advanced some over the past four decades. A hollow point that would reliably expand at .380 velocity didn't exist when I learned to reload -- they became available in the mid-1980s. Now they make them for .25 ACP, but everyone wants penetration (fourteen inches!) instead.
                $endgroup$
                – Zeiss Ikon
                1 hour ago










              • $begingroup$
                I did find a video of an NaK-filled bullet being used. The alloy is liquid at room temperature. It was shot at very close range (probably a necessity to ensure it actually reached the target) and doesn't appear to be noticably better at expansion than potassium which is merely very soft. Note that in all the cases, the bullet isn't "tipped" so much as the jacket being completely emptied of lead and refilled.
                $endgroup$
                – Starfish Prime
                1 hour ago







              1




              1




              $begingroup$
              Citation needed. I'm pretty certain it has always been a fictional device, with no practical real world implementation. Mercury tipped bullets will, at best, be no better than the normal kind.
              $endgroup$
              – Starfish Prime
              2 hours ago




              $begingroup$
              Citation needed. I'm pretty certain it has always been a fictional device, with no practical real world implementation. Mercury tipped bullets will, at best, be no better than the normal kind.
              $endgroup$
              – Starfish Prime
              2 hours ago












              $begingroup$
              Can't give a citation. I read about this in a gun/reloading source, an article with a "mythbusting" attitude, which showed that yes, there was a definite effect of increasing expansion -- but it was in the 1970s, when hollow points were the rage and those who advocated penetration were largely ignored, at least in the press, and after forty-some years, I don't recall the source. The same article, as I recall, showed that the same effect was obtainable without legal issues using vegetable oil or plain water.
              $endgroup$
              – Zeiss Ikon
              1 hour ago




              $begingroup$
              Can't give a citation. I read about this in a gun/reloading source, an article with a "mythbusting" attitude, which showed that yes, there was a definite effect of increasing expansion -- but it was in the 1970s, when hollow points were the rage and those who advocated penetration were largely ignored, at least in the press, and after forty-some years, I don't recall the source. The same article, as I recall, showed that the same effect was obtainable without legal issues using vegetable oil or plain water.
              $endgroup$
              – Zeiss Ikon
              1 hour ago












              $begingroup$
              I'm sure that water or oil will have the same effect, to wit: nothing. I'll bet you a beer that you can't find any evidence of mercury bullets being shown to be better than regular expanding rounds. Unless you're in Norway or something, in which case I'll bet you like a shot of beer.
              $endgroup$
              – Starfish Prime
              1 hour ago




              $begingroup$
              I'm sure that water or oil will have the same effect, to wit: nothing. I'll bet you a beer that you can't find any evidence of mercury bullets being shown to be better than regular expanding rounds. Unless you're in Norway or something, in which case I'll bet you like a shot of beer.
              $endgroup$
              – Starfish Prime
              1 hour ago












              $begingroup$
              Also worth remembering that bullet design has advanced some over the past four decades. A hollow point that would reliably expand at .380 velocity didn't exist when I learned to reload -- they became available in the mid-1980s. Now they make them for .25 ACP, but everyone wants penetration (fourteen inches!) instead.
              $endgroup$
              – Zeiss Ikon
              1 hour ago




              $begingroup$
              Also worth remembering that bullet design has advanced some over the past four decades. A hollow point that would reliably expand at .380 velocity didn't exist when I learned to reload -- they became available in the mid-1980s. Now they make them for .25 ACP, but everyone wants penetration (fourteen inches!) instead.
              $endgroup$
              – Zeiss Ikon
              1 hour ago












              $begingroup$
              I did find a video of an NaK-filled bullet being used. The alloy is liquid at room temperature. It was shot at very close range (probably a necessity to ensure it actually reached the target) and doesn't appear to be noticably better at expansion than potassium which is merely very soft. Note that in all the cases, the bullet isn't "tipped" so much as the jacket being completely emptied of lead and refilled.
              $endgroup$
              – Starfish Prime
              1 hour ago




              $begingroup$
              I did find a video of an NaK-filled bullet being used. The alloy is liquid at room temperature. It was shot at very close range (probably a necessity to ensure it actually reached the target) and doesn't appear to be noticably better at expansion than potassium which is merely very soft. Note that in all the cases, the bullet isn't "tipped" so much as the jacket being completely emptied of lead and refilled.
              $endgroup$
              – Starfish Prime
              1 hour ago











              1












              $begingroup$

              No.



              Not even in the form of dimethylmercury.



              This extremely nasty organic compound was being carefully used by professional toxic metal researcher Karen Wetterhahn when a few small drops of it touched the outside of her latex gloves. At the time it was not known that this noxious substance could travel through latex. Nothing could be done, she died less than a year later.



              To make enough stick to a (hot - >100 celsius) bullet in flight, because it would otherwise evaporate before reaching your target, dipping the bullet would not work, you'd need some water soluble delivery system which releases after impact which would not satisfy the requirements of the question - but careful how your protagonist uses it, lest they succumb the same way.



              Edited due to being wrong all over.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$








              • 1




                $begingroup$
                How hot do bullets get when fired?. TL;DR: at least 100 degrees Celsius, above the boiling point of dimethylmercury.
                $endgroup$
                – Brythan
                1 hour ago






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                I guess you could drill a hole in the end of the bullet, fill it with the noxious substance and then plug it with something like epoxy. A few tests with dye and ballistic gel would confirm whether it's effective or not.
                $endgroup$
                – Spehro Pefhany
                22 mins ago
















              1












              $begingroup$

              No.



              Not even in the form of dimethylmercury.



              This extremely nasty organic compound was being carefully used by professional toxic metal researcher Karen Wetterhahn when a few small drops of it touched the outside of her latex gloves. At the time it was not known that this noxious substance could travel through latex. Nothing could be done, she died less than a year later.



              To make enough stick to a (hot - >100 celsius) bullet in flight, because it would otherwise evaporate before reaching your target, dipping the bullet would not work, you'd need some water soluble delivery system which releases after impact which would not satisfy the requirements of the question - but careful how your protagonist uses it, lest they succumb the same way.



              Edited due to being wrong all over.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$








              • 1




                $begingroup$
                How hot do bullets get when fired?. TL;DR: at least 100 degrees Celsius, above the boiling point of dimethylmercury.
                $endgroup$
                – Brythan
                1 hour ago






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                I guess you could drill a hole in the end of the bullet, fill it with the noxious substance and then plug it with something like epoxy. A few tests with dye and ballistic gel would confirm whether it's effective or not.
                $endgroup$
                – Spehro Pefhany
                22 mins ago














              1












              1








              1





              $begingroup$

              No.



              Not even in the form of dimethylmercury.



              This extremely nasty organic compound was being carefully used by professional toxic metal researcher Karen Wetterhahn when a few small drops of it touched the outside of her latex gloves. At the time it was not known that this noxious substance could travel through latex. Nothing could be done, she died less than a year later.



              To make enough stick to a (hot - >100 celsius) bullet in flight, because it would otherwise evaporate before reaching your target, dipping the bullet would not work, you'd need some water soluble delivery system which releases after impact which would not satisfy the requirements of the question - but careful how your protagonist uses it, lest they succumb the same way.



              Edited due to being wrong all over.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$



              No.



              Not even in the form of dimethylmercury.



              This extremely nasty organic compound was being carefully used by professional toxic metal researcher Karen Wetterhahn when a few small drops of it touched the outside of her latex gloves. At the time it was not known that this noxious substance could travel through latex. Nothing could be done, she died less than a year later.



              To make enough stick to a (hot - >100 celsius) bullet in flight, because it would otherwise evaporate before reaching your target, dipping the bullet would not work, you'd need some water soluble delivery system which releases after impact which would not satisfy the requirements of the question - but careful how your protagonist uses it, lest they succumb the same way.



              Edited due to being wrong all over.







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited 1 hour ago

























              answered 2 hours ago









              AgrajagAgrajag

              6,67411348




              6,67411348







              • 1




                $begingroup$
                How hot do bullets get when fired?. TL;DR: at least 100 degrees Celsius, above the boiling point of dimethylmercury.
                $endgroup$
                – Brythan
                1 hour ago






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                I guess you could drill a hole in the end of the bullet, fill it with the noxious substance and then plug it with something like epoxy. A few tests with dye and ballistic gel would confirm whether it's effective or not.
                $endgroup$
                – Spehro Pefhany
                22 mins ago













              • 1




                $begingroup$
                How hot do bullets get when fired?. TL;DR: at least 100 degrees Celsius, above the boiling point of dimethylmercury.
                $endgroup$
                – Brythan
                1 hour ago






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                I guess you could drill a hole in the end of the bullet, fill it with the noxious substance and then plug it with something like epoxy. A few tests with dye and ballistic gel would confirm whether it's effective or not.
                $endgroup$
                – Spehro Pefhany
                22 mins ago








              1




              1




              $begingroup$
              How hot do bullets get when fired?. TL;DR: at least 100 degrees Celsius, above the boiling point of dimethylmercury.
              $endgroup$
              – Brythan
              1 hour ago




              $begingroup$
              How hot do bullets get when fired?. TL;DR: at least 100 degrees Celsius, above the boiling point of dimethylmercury.
              $endgroup$
              – Brythan
              1 hour ago




              1




              1




              $begingroup$
              I guess you could drill a hole in the end of the bullet, fill it with the noxious substance and then plug it with something like epoxy. A few tests with dye and ballistic gel would confirm whether it's effective or not.
              $endgroup$
              – Spehro Pefhany
              22 mins ago





              $begingroup$
              I guess you could drill a hole in the end of the bullet, fill it with the noxious substance and then plug it with something like epoxy. A few tests with dye and ballistic gel would confirm whether it's effective or not.
              $endgroup$
              – Spehro Pefhany
              22 mins ago












              0












              $begingroup$

              Lead is already poisonous, the addition of mercury might be unnecessary if looking to increase the poisoning potential of a bullet. Instead, I would consider using toxin from poison dart frogs in the bullets.



              This toxin is highly lethal to most creatures, including humans, and was used by aboriginal tribes in the rain forest. They coated darts with this poison (likely where the frogs got their name from) and used a blowgun to inject a person with it.



              You could employ a similar mechanism with your bullets, either coating them in poison or putting the poison into a specialised bullet meant for storing the liquid and releasing it upon impact. If you really wanted to use mercury though, you could fill the bullet with that instead.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$

















                0












                $begingroup$

                Lead is already poisonous, the addition of mercury might be unnecessary if looking to increase the poisoning potential of a bullet. Instead, I would consider using toxin from poison dart frogs in the bullets.



                This toxin is highly lethal to most creatures, including humans, and was used by aboriginal tribes in the rain forest. They coated darts with this poison (likely where the frogs got their name from) and used a blowgun to inject a person with it.



                You could employ a similar mechanism with your bullets, either coating them in poison or putting the poison into a specialised bullet meant for storing the liquid and releasing it upon impact. If you really wanted to use mercury though, you could fill the bullet with that instead.






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  Lead is already poisonous, the addition of mercury might be unnecessary if looking to increase the poisoning potential of a bullet. Instead, I would consider using toxin from poison dart frogs in the bullets.



                  This toxin is highly lethal to most creatures, including humans, and was used by aboriginal tribes in the rain forest. They coated darts with this poison (likely where the frogs got their name from) and used a blowgun to inject a person with it.



                  You could employ a similar mechanism with your bullets, either coating them in poison or putting the poison into a specialised bullet meant for storing the liquid and releasing it upon impact. If you really wanted to use mercury though, you could fill the bullet with that instead.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  Lead is already poisonous, the addition of mercury might be unnecessary if looking to increase the poisoning potential of a bullet. Instead, I would consider using toxin from poison dart frogs in the bullets.



                  This toxin is highly lethal to most creatures, including humans, and was used by aboriginal tribes in the rain forest. They coated darts with this poison (likely where the frogs got their name from) and used a blowgun to inject a person with it.



                  You could employ a similar mechanism with your bullets, either coating them in poison or putting the poison into a specialised bullet meant for storing the liquid and releasing it upon impact. If you really wanted to use mercury though, you could fill the bullet with that instead.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 1 hour ago









                  Brythan

                  20.9k74286




                  20.9k74286










                  answered 2 hours ago









                  Liam MorrisLiam Morris

                  549214




                  549214





















                      -1












                      $begingroup$

                      Mercury



                      Mercury when ingested targets blood, kidneys, central nervous system, liver and the brain. Large doses of Mercury will lead to easily identifiable health symptoms Administration of a chelating agent can help reduce the effects on the body.



                      Acute Mercury poisoning will lead to death, but generally that death will be due to an already existing kidney or liver damage. There is always the possibility that exposure will cause a failure of the central nervous system, which could lead to death.



                      In essence, that big new hole in the body from he gunshot wound will be far more fatal either from tissue damage or a secondary infection. But adding the Mercury sure will make your victim uncomfortable until the body sheds the excess amount down to acceptable levels.



                      • https://fscimage.fishersci.com/msds/96252.htm





                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$












                      • $begingroup$
                        Metallic mercury doesn't form soluble compounds easily. if the mercury isn't already in an organic compound form, it's not noticeably worse than lead -- and contrary to popular fiction, bullets are usually left in the body, because removing them will do more harm than leaving them will.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Zeiss Ikon
                        2 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        @ZeissIkon Surely that seems counter-productive though? Would someone not get lead-poisioning by leaving that bullet inside their body for years? I know that sharp objects that enter the body are usually left in before being removed by medical professionals to prevent further bleeding. I’ve seen vets remove shotgun pellets from a dog before so i am unsure if a doctor would leave a bullet in a human, or at least if that is standard practice.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Liam Morris
                        2 hours ago






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        The body "encysts" foreign objects in scar tissue, which insulates the lead bullet from body fluids. The only time bullets are routinely removed if if they're in a location where friction from movement will break down the cyst, or if they're in a location where there's risk of the bullet moving in a harmful way (in the brain, immediately by the spinal cord or aorta, for instance).
                        $endgroup$
                        – Zeiss Ikon
                        1 hour ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        @ZeissIkon Oh right, i did not know this. I thought that, just by being in the body, the lead would permeate through the skin and cause lead poisoning that way. I would also assume that, if it were possible to easily remove the bullet (such as if it was not burried too deep) a doctor would prefer to do that than leave it in.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Liam Morris
                        50 mins ago















                      -1












                      $begingroup$

                      Mercury



                      Mercury when ingested targets blood, kidneys, central nervous system, liver and the brain. Large doses of Mercury will lead to easily identifiable health symptoms Administration of a chelating agent can help reduce the effects on the body.



                      Acute Mercury poisoning will lead to death, but generally that death will be due to an already existing kidney or liver damage. There is always the possibility that exposure will cause a failure of the central nervous system, which could lead to death.



                      In essence, that big new hole in the body from he gunshot wound will be far more fatal either from tissue damage or a secondary infection. But adding the Mercury sure will make your victim uncomfortable until the body sheds the excess amount down to acceptable levels.



                      • https://fscimage.fishersci.com/msds/96252.htm





                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$












                      • $begingroup$
                        Metallic mercury doesn't form soluble compounds easily. if the mercury isn't already in an organic compound form, it's not noticeably worse than lead -- and contrary to popular fiction, bullets are usually left in the body, because removing them will do more harm than leaving them will.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Zeiss Ikon
                        2 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        @ZeissIkon Surely that seems counter-productive though? Would someone not get lead-poisioning by leaving that bullet inside their body for years? I know that sharp objects that enter the body are usually left in before being removed by medical professionals to prevent further bleeding. I’ve seen vets remove shotgun pellets from a dog before so i am unsure if a doctor would leave a bullet in a human, or at least if that is standard practice.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Liam Morris
                        2 hours ago






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        The body "encysts" foreign objects in scar tissue, which insulates the lead bullet from body fluids. The only time bullets are routinely removed if if they're in a location where friction from movement will break down the cyst, or if they're in a location where there's risk of the bullet moving in a harmful way (in the brain, immediately by the spinal cord or aorta, for instance).
                        $endgroup$
                        – Zeiss Ikon
                        1 hour ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        @ZeissIkon Oh right, i did not know this. I thought that, just by being in the body, the lead would permeate through the skin and cause lead poisoning that way. I would also assume that, if it were possible to easily remove the bullet (such as if it was not burried too deep) a doctor would prefer to do that than leave it in.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Liam Morris
                        50 mins ago













                      -1












                      -1








                      -1





                      $begingroup$

                      Mercury



                      Mercury when ingested targets blood, kidneys, central nervous system, liver and the brain. Large doses of Mercury will lead to easily identifiable health symptoms Administration of a chelating agent can help reduce the effects on the body.



                      Acute Mercury poisoning will lead to death, but generally that death will be due to an already existing kidney or liver damage. There is always the possibility that exposure will cause a failure of the central nervous system, which could lead to death.



                      In essence, that big new hole in the body from he gunshot wound will be far more fatal either from tissue damage or a secondary infection. But adding the Mercury sure will make your victim uncomfortable until the body sheds the excess amount down to acceptable levels.



                      • https://fscimage.fishersci.com/msds/96252.htm





                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$



                      Mercury



                      Mercury when ingested targets blood, kidneys, central nervous system, liver and the brain. Large doses of Mercury will lead to easily identifiable health symptoms Administration of a chelating agent can help reduce the effects on the body.



                      Acute Mercury poisoning will lead to death, but generally that death will be due to an already existing kidney or liver damage. There is always the possibility that exposure will cause a failure of the central nervous system, which could lead to death.



                      In essence, that big new hole in the body from he gunshot wound will be far more fatal either from tissue damage or a secondary infection. But adding the Mercury sure will make your victim uncomfortable until the body sheds the excess amount down to acceptable levels.



                      • https://fscimage.fishersci.com/msds/96252.htm






                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered 2 hours ago









                      gwallygwally

                      3,476814




                      3,476814











                      • $begingroup$
                        Metallic mercury doesn't form soluble compounds easily. if the mercury isn't already in an organic compound form, it's not noticeably worse than lead -- and contrary to popular fiction, bullets are usually left in the body, because removing them will do more harm than leaving them will.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Zeiss Ikon
                        2 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        @ZeissIkon Surely that seems counter-productive though? Would someone not get lead-poisioning by leaving that bullet inside their body for years? I know that sharp objects that enter the body are usually left in before being removed by medical professionals to prevent further bleeding. I’ve seen vets remove shotgun pellets from a dog before so i am unsure if a doctor would leave a bullet in a human, or at least if that is standard practice.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Liam Morris
                        2 hours ago






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        The body "encysts" foreign objects in scar tissue, which insulates the lead bullet from body fluids. The only time bullets are routinely removed if if they're in a location where friction from movement will break down the cyst, or if they're in a location where there's risk of the bullet moving in a harmful way (in the brain, immediately by the spinal cord or aorta, for instance).
                        $endgroup$
                        – Zeiss Ikon
                        1 hour ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        @ZeissIkon Oh right, i did not know this. I thought that, just by being in the body, the lead would permeate through the skin and cause lead poisoning that way. I would also assume that, if it were possible to easily remove the bullet (such as if it was not burried too deep) a doctor would prefer to do that than leave it in.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Liam Morris
                        50 mins ago
















                      • $begingroup$
                        Metallic mercury doesn't form soluble compounds easily. if the mercury isn't already in an organic compound form, it's not noticeably worse than lead -- and contrary to popular fiction, bullets are usually left in the body, because removing them will do more harm than leaving them will.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Zeiss Ikon
                        2 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        @ZeissIkon Surely that seems counter-productive though? Would someone not get lead-poisioning by leaving that bullet inside their body for years? I know that sharp objects that enter the body are usually left in before being removed by medical professionals to prevent further bleeding. I’ve seen vets remove shotgun pellets from a dog before so i am unsure if a doctor would leave a bullet in a human, or at least if that is standard practice.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Liam Morris
                        2 hours ago






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        The body "encysts" foreign objects in scar tissue, which insulates the lead bullet from body fluids. The only time bullets are routinely removed if if they're in a location where friction from movement will break down the cyst, or if they're in a location where there's risk of the bullet moving in a harmful way (in the brain, immediately by the spinal cord or aorta, for instance).
                        $endgroup$
                        – Zeiss Ikon
                        1 hour ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        @ZeissIkon Oh right, i did not know this. I thought that, just by being in the body, the lead would permeate through the skin and cause lead poisoning that way. I would also assume that, if it were possible to easily remove the bullet (such as if it was not burried too deep) a doctor would prefer to do that than leave it in.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Liam Morris
                        50 mins ago















                      $begingroup$
                      Metallic mercury doesn't form soluble compounds easily. if the mercury isn't already in an organic compound form, it's not noticeably worse than lead -- and contrary to popular fiction, bullets are usually left in the body, because removing them will do more harm than leaving them will.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Zeiss Ikon
                      2 hours ago




                      $begingroup$
                      Metallic mercury doesn't form soluble compounds easily. if the mercury isn't already in an organic compound form, it's not noticeably worse than lead -- and contrary to popular fiction, bullets are usually left in the body, because removing them will do more harm than leaving them will.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Zeiss Ikon
                      2 hours ago












                      $begingroup$
                      @ZeissIkon Surely that seems counter-productive though? Would someone not get lead-poisioning by leaving that bullet inside their body for years? I know that sharp objects that enter the body are usually left in before being removed by medical professionals to prevent further bleeding. I’ve seen vets remove shotgun pellets from a dog before so i am unsure if a doctor would leave a bullet in a human, or at least if that is standard practice.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Liam Morris
                      2 hours ago




                      $begingroup$
                      @ZeissIkon Surely that seems counter-productive though? Would someone not get lead-poisioning by leaving that bullet inside their body for years? I know that sharp objects that enter the body are usually left in before being removed by medical professionals to prevent further bleeding. I’ve seen vets remove shotgun pellets from a dog before so i am unsure if a doctor would leave a bullet in a human, or at least if that is standard practice.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Liam Morris
                      2 hours ago




                      1




                      1




                      $begingroup$
                      The body "encysts" foreign objects in scar tissue, which insulates the lead bullet from body fluids. The only time bullets are routinely removed if if they're in a location where friction from movement will break down the cyst, or if they're in a location where there's risk of the bullet moving in a harmful way (in the brain, immediately by the spinal cord or aorta, for instance).
                      $endgroup$
                      – Zeiss Ikon
                      1 hour ago




                      $begingroup$
                      The body "encysts" foreign objects in scar tissue, which insulates the lead bullet from body fluids. The only time bullets are routinely removed if if they're in a location where friction from movement will break down the cyst, or if they're in a location where there's risk of the bullet moving in a harmful way (in the brain, immediately by the spinal cord or aorta, for instance).
                      $endgroup$
                      – Zeiss Ikon
                      1 hour ago












                      $begingroup$
                      @ZeissIkon Oh right, i did not know this. I thought that, just by being in the body, the lead would permeate through the skin and cause lead poisoning that way. I would also assume that, if it were possible to easily remove the bullet (such as if it was not burried too deep) a doctor would prefer to do that than leave it in.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Liam Morris
                      50 mins ago




                      $begingroup$
                      @ZeissIkon Oh right, i did not know this. I thought that, just by being in the body, the lead would permeate through the skin and cause lead poisoning that way. I would also assume that, if it were possible to easily remove the bullet (such as if it was not burried too deep) a doctor would prefer to do that than leave it in.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Liam Morris
                      50 mins ago

















                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143138%2fassassins-bullet-with-mercury%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Category:Fedor von Bock Media in category "Fedor von Bock"Navigation menuUpload mediaISNI: 0000 0000 5511 3417VIAF ID: 24712551GND ID: 119294796Library of Congress authority ID: n96068363BnF ID: 12534305fSUDOC authorities ID: 034604189Open Library ID: OL338253ANKCR AUT ID: jn19990000869National Library of Israel ID: 000514068National Thesaurus for Author Names ID: 341574317ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

                      Reverse int within the 32-bit signed integer range: [−2^31, 2^31 − 1]Combining two 32-bit integers into one 64-bit integerDetermine if an int is within rangeLossy packing 32 bit integer to 16 bitComputing the square root of a 64-bit integerKeeping integer addition within boundsSafe multiplication of two 64-bit signed integersLeetcode 10: Regular Expression MatchingSigned integer-to-ascii x86_64 assembler macroReverse the digits of an Integer“Add two numbers given in reverse order from a linked list”

                      Log på Navigationsmenu