Einstein metrics on spheres The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InSmooth Poincaré Conjecturerescaled metric quantities on rescaling metricsReversing the Ricci flowThoughts about sectional curvatureEasy solution to Yamabe problem for surfacesShowing that Ricci curvature of round unit sphere $(S^n,g_0)$ is $Ric(g_0)=(n-1)g_0$Uniformization of metrics vs. uniformization of Riemann surfacesCounterexample to Gunther Theorem when assuming only a Ricci curvature upper boundPointwise conformal vs. conformally diffeomorphic metrics in dimension 2Upper volume bounds for submanifolds
What do hard-Brexiteers want with respect to the Irish border?
Does it makes sense to buy a new cycle to learn riding?
Patience, young "Padovan"
Carnot-Caratheodory metric
Inflated grade on resume at previous job, might former employer tell new employer?
Where to refill my bottle in India?
Are there any other methods to apply to solving simultaneous equations?
Lethal sonic weapons
Should I use my personal or workplace e-mail when registering to external websites for work purpose?
How to reverse every other sublist of a list?
Falsification in Math vs Science
Why isn't airport relocation done gradually?
Dual Citizen. Exited the US on Italian passport recently
What are the motivations for publishing new editions of an existing textbook, beyond new discoveries in a field?
What does "sndry explns" mean in one of the Hitchhiker's guide books?
Is bread bad for ducks?
How long do I have to send payment?
is usb on wall sockets live all the time with out switches off
Does duplicating a spell with wish count as casting that spell?
If Wish Duplicates Simulacrum, Are Existing Duplicates Destroyed?
Can't find the latex code for the ⍎ (down tack jot) symbol
Idiomatic way to prevent slicing?
Is flight data recorder erased after every flight?
What function has this graph?
Einstein metrics on spheres
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InSmooth Poincaré Conjecturerescaled metric quantities on rescaling metricsReversing the Ricci flowThoughts about sectional curvatureEasy solution to Yamabe problem for surfacesShowing that Ricci curvature of round unit sphere $(S^n,g_0)$ is $Ric(g_0)=(n-1)g_0$Uniformization of metrics vs. uniformization of Riemann surfacesCounterexample to Gunther Theorem when assuming only a Ricci curvature upper boundPointwise conformal vs. conformally diffeomorphic metrics in dimension 2Upper volume bounds for submanifolds
$begingroup$
I've got a couple of quick questions that came up after reading a peculiar statement in some article. The sentence says something like "... is the $N$-dimensional sphere with constant Ricci curvature equal to $K$...", and the questions are something like:
For $(mathbbS^n,g)$ the sphere with its standard differential structure and $some$ Riemannian metric on it,
1.a. Does $g$ being an Einstein metric implies that it is actually the round metric (up to some normalization constant)?
1.b. Does the answer change if we change to an alternative differential structure (when possible)?
I guess this shouldn't be true, so in this case
2. Is there an intuitive way to understand how one could construct a metric which is Einstein but not of constant curvature?
Anyways, I thank you all in advance for sharing your knowledge.
differential-geometry riemannian-geometry
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I've got a couple of quick questions that came up after reading a peculiar statement in some article. The sentence says something like "... is the $N$-dimensional sphere with constant Ricci curvature equal to $K$...", and the questions are something like:
For $(mathbbS^n,g)$ the sphere with its standard differential structure and $some$ Riemannian metric on it,
1.a. Does $g$ being an Einstein metric implies that it is actually the round metric (up to some normalization constant)?
1.b. Does the answer change if we change to an alternative differential structure (when possible)?
I guess this shouldn't be true, so in this case
2. Is there an intuitive way to understand how one could construct a metric which is Einstein but not of constant curvature?
Anyways, I thank you all in advance for sharing your knowledge.
differential-geometry riemannian-geometry
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I've got a couple of quick questions that came up after reading a peculiar statement in some article. The sentence says something like "... is the $N$-dimensional sphere with constant Ricci curvature equal to $K$...", and the questions are something like:
For $(mathbbS^n,g)$ the sphere with its standard differential structure and $some$ Riemannian metric on it,
1.a. Does $g$ being an Einstein metric implies that it is actually the round metric (up to some normalization constant)?
1.b. Does the answer change if we change to an alternative differential structure (when possible)?
I guess this shouldn't be true, so in this case
2. Is there an intuitive way to understand how one could construct a metric which is Einstein but not of constant curvature?
Anyways, I thank you all in advance for sharing your knowledge.
differential-geometry riemannian-geometry
$endgroup$
I've got a couple of quick questions that came up after reading a peculiar statement in some article. The sentence says something like "... is the $N$-dimensional sphere with constant Ricci curvature equal to $K$...", and the questions are something like:
For $(mathbbS^n,g)$ the sphere with its standard differential structure and $some$ Riemannian metric on it,
1.a. Does $g$ being an Einstein metric implies that it is actually the round metric (up to some normalization constant)?
1.b. Does the answer change if we change to an alternative differential structure (when possible)?
I guess this shouldn't be true, so in this case
2. Is there an intuitive way to understand how one could construct a metric which is Einstein but not of constant curvature?
Anyways, I thank you all in advance for sharing your knowledge.
differential-geometry riemannian-geometry
differential-geometry riemannian-geometry
edited yesterday
Michael Albanese
64.7k1599315
64.7k1599315
asked yesterday
Bruce WayneBruce Wayne
453213
453213
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
No, there are Einstein metrics on spheres which are not rescalings of the round metric. See the introduction of Einstein metrics on spheres by Boyer, Galicki, & Kollár for some constructions. However, as far as I am aware, there are no known examples of Einstein metrics with non-positive Einstein constant. In particular, it is an open question as to whether $S^n$ admits a Ricci-flat metric for $n geq 4$.
If we consider exotic spheres, they do not admit a 'round metric' or any metric of constant curvature, so I'm not sure what is meant by this. However, there are examples of Einstein metrics on exotic spheres, see Einstein Metrics on Exotic Spheres in Dimensions 7, 11, and 15 by Boyer, Galicki, Kollár, & Thomas for example. Note however that there are some exotic spheres which, if they admit Einstein metrics, must have negative Einstein constant.
Finding Einstein metrics which are not constant curvature is, in general, a hard thing to do and an area of active research.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
great, thanks! Yeah, of course you are right, question 1b doesn't make sense as stated. I wrote it fast, sorry!
$endgroup$
– Bruce Wayne
yesterday
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3179975%2feinstein-metrics-on-spheres%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
No, there are Einstein metrics on spheres which are not rescalings of the round metric. See the introduction of Einstein metrics on spheres by Boyer, Galicki, & Kollár for some constructions. However, as far as I am aware, there are no known examples of Einstein metrics with non-positive Einstein constant. In particular, it is an open question as to whether $S^n$ admits a Ricci-flat metric for $n geq 4$.
If we consider exotic spheres, they do not admit a 'round metric' or any metric of constant curvature, so I'm not sure what is meant by this. However, there are examples of Einstein metrics on exotic spheres, see Einstein Metrics on Exotic Spheres in Dimensions 7, 11, and 15 by Boyer, Galicki, Kollár, & Thomas for example. Note however that there are some exotic spheres which, if they admit Einstein metrics, must have negative Einstein constant.
Finding Einstein metrics which are not constant curvature is, in general, a hard thing to do and an area of active research.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
great, thanks! Yeah, of course you are right, question 1b doesn't make sense as stated. I wrote it fast, sorry!
$endgroup$
– Bruce Wayne
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, there are Einstein metrics on spheres which are not rescalings of the round metric. See the introduction of Einstein metrics on spheres by Boyer, Galicki, & Kollár for some constructions. However, as far as I am aware, there are no known examples of Einstein metrics with non-positive Einstein constant. In particular, it is an open question as to whether $S^n$ admits a Ricci-flat metric for $n geq 4$.
If we consider exotic spheres, they do not admit a 'round metric' or any metric of constant curvature, so I'm not sure what is meant by this. However, there are examples of Einstein metrics on exotic spheres, see Einstein Metrics on Exotic Spheres in Dimensions 7, 11, and 15 by Boyer, Galicki, Kollár, & Thomas for example. Note however that there are some exotic spheres which, if they admit Einstein metrics, must have negative Einstein constant.
Finding Einstein metrics which are not constant curvature is, in general, a hard thing to do and an area of active research.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
great, thanks! Yeah, of course you are right, question 1b doesn't make sense as stated. I wrote it fast, sorry!
$endgroup$
– Bruce Wayne
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, there are Einstein metrics on spheres which are not rescalings of the round metric. See the introduction of Einstein metrics on spheres by Boyer, Galicki, & Kollár for some constructions. However, as far as I am aware, there are no known examples of Einstein metrics with non-positive Einstein constant. In particular, it is an open question as to whether $S^n$ admits a Ricci-flat metric for $n geq 4$.
If we consider exotic spheres, they do not admit a 'round metric' or any metric of constant curvature, so I'm not sure what is meant by this. However, there are examples of Einstein metrics on exotic spheres, see Einstein Metrics on Exotic Spheres in Dimensions 7, 11, and 15 by Boyer, Galicki, Kollár, & Thomas for example. Note however that there are some exotic spheres which, if they admit Einstein metrics, must have negative Einstein constant.
Finding Einstein metrics which are not constant curvature is, in general, a hard thing to do and an area of active research.
$endgroup$
No, there are Einstein metrics on spheres which are not rescalings of the round metric. See the introduction of Einstein metrics on spheres by Boyer, Galicki, & Kollár for some constructions. However, as far as I am aware, there are no known examples of Einstein metrics with non-positive Einstein constant. In particular, it is an open question as to whether $S^n$ admits a Ricci-flat metric for $n geq 4$.
If we consider exotic spheres, they do not admit a 'round metric' or any metric of constant curvature, so I'm not sure what is meant by this. However, there are examples of Einstein metrics on exotic spheres, see Einstein Metrics on Exotic Spheres in Dimensions 7, 11, and 15 by Boyer, Galicki, Kollár, & Thomas for example. Note however that there are some exotic spheres which, if they admit Einstein metrics, must have negative Einstein constant.
Finding Einstein metrics which are not constant curvature is, in general, a hard thing to do and an area of active research.
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
Michael AlbaneseMichael Albanese
64.7k1599315
64.7k1599315
$begingroup$
great, thanks! Yeah, of course you are right, question 1b doesn't make sense as stated. I wrote it fast, sorry!
$endgroup$
– Bruce Wayne
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
great, thanks! Yeah, of course you are right, question 1b doesn't make sense as stated. I wrote it fast, sorry!
$endgroup$
– Bruce Wayne
yesterday
$begingroup$
great, thanks! Yeah, of course you are right, question 1b doesn't make sense as stated. I wrote it fast, sorry!
$endgroup$
– Bruce Wayne
yesterday
$begingroup$
great, thanks! Yeah, of course you are right, question 1b doesn't make sense as stated. I wrote it fast, sorry!
$endgroup$
– Bruce Wayne
yesterday
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3179975%2feinstein-metrics-on-spheres%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown