Is it a good practice to use a static variable in a Test Class and use that in the actual class instead of Test.isRunningTest()? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InAssistance with a Test Class to increase code coverageCompilation error with a unit testError: Compile Error: Illegal assignment from String to Booleanschema.getglobaldescribe needs test classWhy is this test giving 0% coverage?Test class for the zenkraft process classI am not able to cover the specific code in Apex classHow to cover global class and method in test classHow can I reference a trigger's method and/or variable from a test class?Test Class: Unable to assert enqueueJob

Button changing its text & action. Good or terrible?

Star Trek - X-shaped Item on Regula/Orbital Office Starbases

How to charge AirPods to keep battery healthy?

Mathematics of imaging the black hole

Is Cinnamon a desktop environment or a window manager? (Or both?)

Why doesn't UInt have a toDouble()?

Kerning for subscripts of sigma?

How do I free up internal storage if I don't have any apps downloaded?

Is bread bad for ducks?

What does もの mean in this sentence?

What do I do when my TA workload is more than expected?

Getting crown tickets for Statue of Liberty

Worn-tile Scrabble

Is it okay to consider publishing in my first year of PhD?

Why don't hard Brexiteers insist on a hard border to prevent illegal immigration after Brexit?

For what reasons would an animal species NOT cross a *horizontal* land bridge?

Straighten subgroup lattice

What to do when moving next to a bird sanctuary with a loosely-domesticated cat?

Deal with toxic manager when you can't quit

Relationship between Gromov-Witten and Taubes' Gromov invariant

What is preventing me from simply constructing a hash that's lower than the current target?

Why doesn't shell automatically fix "useless use of cat"?

Will it cause any balance problems to have PCs level up and gain the benefits of a long rest mid-fight?

Can withdrawing asylum be illegal?



Is it a good practice to use a static variable in a Test Class and use that in the actual class instead of Test.isRunningTest()?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InAssistance with a Test Class to increase code coverageCompilation error with a unit testError: Compile Error: Illegal assignment from String to Booleanschema.getglobaldescribe needs test classWhy is this test giving 0% coverage?Test class for the zenkraft process classI am not able to cover the specific code in Apex classHow to cover global class and method in test classHow can I reference a trigger's method and/or variable from a test class?Test Class: Unable to assert enqueueJob



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








1















I've read about using a static variable from a class in the test class but I'm wondering if this is legal enough to do.



@isTest
public class myTestClass
public static Boolean mySwitch = false;
public static testMethod void myTestMethod1()
// code //

public static testMethod void myTestMethod2()
mySwitch = true;
// code //



public class actualClass
public void method1()
if(Test.isRunningTest)
//always true if its hitting from a test class.
else if(Test.isRunningTest && myTestClass.mySwitch)
//do something from myTestMethod2












share|improve this question







New contributor




Apz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 2





    What code/why are you trying to gate in test context? That's something one generally ought to do only if one really has to and has run out of other tools, in my opinion.

    – David Reed
    4 hours ago











  • I'm sorry but can't share my code here. I can explain why am trying to do this, let's say there is an if condition which can't be made true from a test class but can be done using Test.isRunningTest() in actual class. What this does now is that, it will always get into this if condition but not the next if-else conditions. My bad if this is confusing.

    – Apz
    4 hours ago

















1















I've read about using a static variable from a class in the test class but I'm wondering if this is legal enough to do.



@isTest
public class myTestClass
public static Boolean mySwitch = false;
public static testMethod void myTestMethod1()
// code //

public static testMethod void myTestMethod2()
mySwitch = true;
// code //



public class actualClass
public void method1()
if(Test.isRunningTest)
//always true if its hitting from a test class.
else if(Test.isRunningTest && myTestClass.mySwitch)
//do something from myTestMethod2












share|improve this question







New contributor




Apz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 2





    What code/why are you trying to gate in test context? That's something one generally ought to do only if one really has to and has run out of other tools, in my opinion.

    – David Reed
    4 hours ago











  • I'm sorry but can't share my code here. I can explain why am trying to do this, let's say there is an if condition which can't be made true from a test class but can be done using Test.isRunningTest() in actual class. What this does now is that, it will always get into this if condition but not the next if-else conditions. My bad if this is confusing.

    – Apz
    4 hours ago













1












1








1








I've read about using a static variable from a class in the test class but I'm wondering if this is legal enough to do.



@isTest
public class myTestClass
public static Boolean mySwitch = false;
public static testMethod void myTestMethod1()
// code //

public static testMethod void myTestMethod2()
mySwitch = true;
// code //



public class actualClass
public void method1()
if(Test.isRunningTest)
//always true if its hitting from a test class.
else if(Test.isRunningTest && myTestClass.mySwitch)
//do something from myTestMethod2












share|improve this question







New contributor




Apz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












I've read about using a static variable from a class in the test class but I'm wondering if this is legal enough to do.



@isTest
public class myTestClass
public static Boolean mySwitch = false;
public static testMethod void myTestMethod1()
// code //

public static testMethod void myTestMethod2()
mySwitch = true;
// code //



public class actualClass
public void method1()
if(Test.isRunningTest)
//always true if its hitting from a test class.
else if(Test.isRunningTest && myTestClass.mySwitch)
//do something from myTestMethod2









apex unit-test code-coverage






share|improve this question







New contributor




Apz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




Apz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




Apz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 4 hours ago









ApzApz

61




61




New contributor




Apz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Apz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Apz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 2





    What code/why are you trying to gate in test context? That's something one generally ought to do only if one really has to and has run out of other tools, in my opinion.

    – David Reed
    4 hours ago











  • I'm sorry but can't share my code here. I can explain why am trying to do this, let's say there is an if condition which can't be made true from a test class but can be done using Test.isRunningTest() in actual class. What this does now is that, it will always get into this if condition but not the next if-else conditions. My bad if this is confusing.

    – Apz
    4 hours ago












  • 2





    What code/why are you trying to gate in test context? That's something one generally ought to do only if one really has to and has run out of other tools, in my opinion.

    – David Reed
    4 hours ago











  • I'm sorry but can't share my code here. I can explain why am trying to do this, let's say there is an if condition which can't be made true from a test class but can be done using Test.isRunningTest() in actual class. What this does now is that, it will always get into this if condition but not the next if-else conditions. My bad if this is confusing.

    – Apz
    4 hours ago







2




2





What code/why are you trying to gate in test context? That's something one generally ought to do only if one really has to and has run out of other tools, in my opinion.

– David Reed
4 hours ago





What code/why are you trying to gate in test context? That's something one generally ought to do only if one really has to and has run out of other tools, in my opinion.

– David Reed
4 hours ago













I'm sorry but can't share my code here. I can explain why am trying to do this, let's say there is an if condition which can't be made true from a test class but can be done using Test.isRunningTest() in actual class. What this does now is that, it will always get into this if condition but not the next if-else conditions. My bad if this is confusing.

– Apz
4 hours ago





I'm sorry but can't share my code here. I can explain why am trying to do this, let's say there is an if condition which can't be made true from a test class but can be done using Test.isRunningTest() in actual class. What this does now is that, it will always get into this if condition but not the next if-else conditions. My bad if this is confusing.

– Apz
4 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2














You cannot reference a test class from a production class. You have the pattern reversed on where the Boolean flag should be.



You should avoid code which runs only out of a test context wherever possible. There are a few exceptions, such as:



  • Disabling a trigger framework to save on run times if they become prohibitive

  • Disabling batch chaining or other aspects of asynchronous processing

In these cases, you still should not use Test.isRunningTest() (at least according to our coding guideline where I work). Instead, you should use a @TestVisible flag in your production code.



public with sharing class MyClass

@TestVisible static Boolean shouldDoStuff = true;
public static void doStuff()

if (!shouldDoStuff) return;

// actual logic

public static void doNonGatedStuff()

doStuff();

// other logic


@IsTest class MyClass

@IsTest static void testDoStuff()

MyClass.shouldDoStuff = false;

// rest of test




Sometimes you will see this logic reversed. For example our typical flag for trigger handlers is called bypassTrigger, which would obviously default to false. You set it to true before inserting some records for setup, then bookend it back to false so that any further operations will still run the trigger.






share|improve this answer

























  • P.S. You didn't actually answer the question of "if this is legal?"

    – sfdcfox
    4 hours ago











  • Because the way it was written wouldn't work, I simply showed how it can be done.

    – Adrian Larson
    4 hours ago


















0














No, it is not valid. You cannot access any variables or methods inside a class marked @isTest outside of a test context. Instead, you need to place the static variable inside the actual class, then modify it in the test class:



@isTest
public class myTestClass
public static testMethod void myTestMethod1()
// code //

public static testMethod void myTestMethod2()
actualClass.mySwitch = true;
// code //



public class actualClass
@TestVisible static Boolean mySwitch = false;
public void method2()
if(mySwitch)
//do something from myTestMethod2





You can use @TestVisible to prevent accessing the variable outside of testing context.






share|improve this answer

























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "459"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    Apz is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f257558%2fis-it-a-good-practice-to-use-a-static-variable-in-a-test-class-and-use-that-in-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2














    You cannot reference a test class from a production class. You have the pattern reversed on where the Boolean flag should be.



    You should avoid code which runs only out of a test context wherever possible. There are a few exceptions, such as:



    • Disabling a trigger framework to save on run times if they become prohibitive

    • Disabling batch chaining or other aspects of asynchronous processing

    In these cases, you still should not use Test.isRunningTest() (at least according to our coding guideline where I work). Instead, you should use a @TestVisible flag in your production code.



    public with sharing class MyClass

    @TestVisible static Boolean shouldDoStuff = true;
    public static void doStuff()

    if (!shouldDoStuff) return;

    // actual logic

    public static void doNonGatedStuff()

    doStuff();

    // other logic


    @IsTest class MyClass

    @IsTest static void testDoStuff()

    MyClass.shouldDoStuff = false;

    // rest of test




    Sometimes you will see this logic reversed. For example our typical flag for trigger handlers is called bypassTrigger, which would obviously default to false. You set it to true before inserting some records for setup, then bookend it back to false so that any further operations will still run the trigger.






    share|improve this answer

























    • P.S. You didn't actually answer the question of "if this is legal?"

      – sfdcfox
      4 hours ago











    • Because the way it was written wouldn't work, I simply showed how it can be done.

      – Adrian Larson
      4 hours ago















    2














    You cannot reference a test class from a production class. You have the pattern reversed on where the Boolean flag should be.



    You should avoid code which runs only out of a test context wherever possible. There are a few exceptions, such as:



    • Disabling a trigger framework to save on run times if they become prohibitive

    • Disabling batch chaining or other aspects of asynchronous processing

    In these cases, you still should not use Test.isRunningTest() (at least according to our coding guideline where I work). Instead, you should use a @TestVisible flag in your production code.



    public with sharing class MyClass

    @TestVisible static Boolean shouldDoStuff = true;
    public static void doStuff()

    if (!shouldDoStuff) return;

    // actual logic

    public static void doNonGatedStuff()

    doStuff();

    // other logic


    @IsTest class MyClass

    @IsTest static void testDoStuff()

    MyClass.shouldDoStuff = false;

    // rest of test




    Sometimes you will see this logic reversed. For example our typical flag for trigger handlers is called bypassTrigger, which would obviously default to false. You set it to true before inserting some records for setup, then bookend it back to false so that any further operations will still run the trigger.






    share|improve this answer

























    • P.S. You didn't actually answer the question of "if this is legal?"

      – sfdcfox
      4 hours ago











    • Because the way it was written wouldn't work, I simply showed how it can be done.

      – Adrian Larson
      4 hours ago













    2












    2








    2







    You cannot reference a test class from a production class. You have the pattern reversed on where the Boolean flag should be.



    You should avoid code which runs only out of a test context wherever possible. There are a few exceptions, such as:



    • Disabling a trigger framework to save on run times if they become prohibitive

    • Disabling batch chaining or other aspects of asynchronous processing

    In these cases, you still should not use Test.isRunningTest() (at least according to our coding guideline where I work). Instead, you should use a @TestVisible flag in your production code.



    public with sharing class MyClass

    @TestVisible static Boolean shouldDoStuff = true;
    public static void doStuff()

    if (!shouldDoStuff) return;

    // actual logic

    public static void doNonGatedStuff()

    doStuff();

    // other logic


    @IsTest class MyClass

    @IsTest static void testDoStuff()

    MyClass.shouldDoStuff = false;

    // rest of test




    Sometimes you will see this logic reversed. For example our typical flag for trigger handlers is called bypassTrigger, which would obviously default to false. You set it to true before inserting some records for setup, then bookend it back to false so that any further operations will still run the trigger.






    share|improve this answer















    You cannot reference a test class from a production class. You have the pattern reversed on where the Boolean flag should be.



    You should avoid code which runs only out of a test context wherever possible. There are a few exceptions, such as:



    • Disabling a trigger framework to save on run times if they become prohibitive

    • Disabling batch chaining or other aspects of asynchronous processing

    In these cases, you still should not use Test.isRunningTest() (at least according to our coding guideline where I work). Instead, you should use a @TestVisible flag in your production code.



    public with sharing class MyClass

    @TestVisible static Boolean shouldDoStuff = true;
    public static void doStuff()

    if (!shouldDoStuff) return;

    // actual logic

    public static void doNonGatedStuff()

    doStuff();

    // other logic


    @IsTest class MyClass

    @IsTest static void testDoStuff()

    MyClass.shouldDoStuff = false;

    // rest of test




    Sometimes you will see this logic reversed. For example our typical flag for trigger handlers is called bypassTrigger, which would obviously default to false. You set it to true before inserting some records for setup, then bookend it back to false so that any further operations will still run the trigger.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 4 hours ago

























    answered 4 hours ago









    Adrian LarsonAdrian Larson

    110k19120256




    110k19120256












    • P.S. You didn't actually answer the question of "if this is legal?"

      – sfdcfox
      4 hours ago











    • Because the way it was written wouldn't work, I simply showed how it can be done.

      – Adrian Larson
      4 hours ago

















    • P.S. You didn't actually answer the question of "if this is legal?"

      – sfdcfox
      4 hours ago











    • Because the way it was written wouldn't work, I simply showed how it can be done.

      – Adrian Larson
      4 hours ago
















    P.S. You didn't actually answer the question of "if this is legal?"

    – sfdcfox
    4 hours ago





    P.S. You didn't actually answer the question of "if this is legal?"

    – sfdcfox
    4 hours ago













    Because the way it was written wouldn't work, I simply showed how it can be done.

    – Adrian Larson
    4 hours ago





    Because the way it was written wouldn't work, I simply showed how it can be done.

    – Adrian Larson
    4 hours ago













    0














    No, it is not valid. You cannot access any variables or methods inside a class marked @isTest outside of a test context. Instead, you need to place the static variable inside the actual class, then modify it in the test class:



    @isTest
    public class myTestClass
    public static testMethod void myTestMethod1()
    // code //

    public static testMethod void myTestMethod2()
    actualClass.mySwitch = true;
    // code //



    public class actualClass
    @TestVisible static Boolean mySwitch = false;
    public void method2()
    if(mySwitch)
    //do something from myTestMethod2





    You can use @TestVisible to prevent accessing the variable outside of testing context.






    share|improve this answer





























      0














      No, it is not valid. You cannot access any variables or methods inside a class marked @isTest outside of a test context. Instead, you need to place the static variable inside the actual class, then modify it in the test class:



      @isTest
      public class myTestClass
      public static testMethod void myTestMethod1()
      // code //

      public static testMethod void myTestMethod2()
      actualClass.mySwitch = true;
      // code //



      public class actualClass
      @TestVisible static Boolean mySwitch = false;
      public void method2()
      if(mySwitch)
      //do something from myTestMethod2





      You can use @TestVisible to prevent accessing the variable outside of testing context.






      share|improve this answer



























        0












        0








        0







        No, it is not valid. You cannot access any variables or methods inside a class marked @isTest outside of a test context. Instead, you need to place the static variable inside the actual class, then modify it in the test class:



        @isTest
        public class myTestClass
        public static testMethod void myTestMethod1()
        // code //

        public static testMethod void myTestMethod2()
        actualClass.mySwitch = true;
        // code //



        public class actualClass
        @TestVisible static Boolean mySwitch = false;
        public void method2()
        if(mySwitch)
        //do something from myTestMethod2





        You can use @TestVisible to prevent accessing the variable outside of testing context.






        share|improve this answer















        No, it is not valid. You cannot access any variables or methods inside a class marked @isTest outside of a test context. Instead, you need to place the static variable inside the actual class, then modify it in the test class:



        @isTest
        public class myTestClass
        public static testMethod void myTestMethod1()
        // code //

        public static testMethod void myTestMethod2()
        actualClass.mySwitch = true;
        // code //



        public class actualClass
        @TestVisible static Boolean mySwitch = false;
        public void method2()
        if(mySwitch)
        //do something from myTestMethod2





        You can use @TestVisible to prevent accessing the variable outside of testing context.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 4 hours ago

























        answered 4 hours ago









        sfdcfoxsfdcfox

        264k13211458




        264k13211458




















            Apz is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Apz is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Apz is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            Apz is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to Salesforce Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f257558%2fis-it-a-good-practice-to-use-a-static-variable-in-a-test-class-and-use-that-in-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Reverse int within the 32-bit signed integer range: [−2^31, 2^31 − 1]Combining two 32-bit integers into one 64-bit integerDetermine if an int is within rangeLossy packing 32 bit integer to 16 bitComputing the square root of a 64-bit integerKeeping integer addition within boundsSafe multiplication of two 64-bit signed integersLeetcode 10: Regular Expression MatchingSigned integer-to-ascii x86_64 assembler macroReverse the digits of an Integer“Add two numbers given in reverse order from a linked list”

            Category:Fedor von Bock Media in category "Fedor von Bock"Navigation menuUpload mediaISNI: 0000 0000 5511 3417VIAF ID: 24712551GND ID: 119294796Library of Congress authority ID: n96068363BnF ID: 12534305fSUDOC authorities ID: 034604189Open Library ID: OL338253ANKCR AUT ID: jn19990000869National Library of Israel ID: 000514068National Thesaurus for Author Names ID: 341574317ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

            Kiel Indholdsfortegnelse Historie | Transport og færgeforbindelser | Sejlsport og anden sport | Kultur | Kendte personer fra Kiel | Noter | Litteratur | Eksterne henvisninger | Navigationsmenuwww.kiel.de54°19′31″N 10°8′26″Ø / 54.32528°N 10.14056°Ø / 54.32528; 10.14056Oberbürgermeister Dr. Ulf Kämpferwww.statistik-nord.deDen danske Stats StatistikKiels hjemmesiderrrWorldCat312794080n790547494030481-4