Rrerku

Why not take a picture of a closer black hole?

What is this business jet?

How to support a colleague who finds meetings extremely tiring?

Output the Arecibo Message

How much of the clove should I use when using big garlic heads?

writing variables above the numbers in tikz picture

The phrase "to the numbers born"?

Flight paths in orbit around Ceres?

What does Linus Torvalds mean when he says that Git "never ever" tracks a file?

Why was M87 targeted for the Event Horizon Telescope instead of Sagittarius A*?

ODD NUMBER in Cognitive Linguistics of WILLIAM CROFT and D. ALAN CRUSE

Is it safe to harvest rainwater that fell on solar panels?

What do these terms in Caesar's Gallic wars mean?

If I score a critical hit on an 18 or higher, what are my chances of getting a critical hit if I roll 3d20?

How to charge AirPods to keep battery healthy?

Dropping list elements from nested list after evaluation

Can you cast a spell on someone in the Ethereal Plane, if you are on the Material Plane and have the True Seeing spell active?

Did the UK government pay "millions and millions of dollars" to try to snag Julian Assange?

Pokemon Turn Based battle (Python)

Match Roman Numerals

For what reasons would an animal species NOT cross a *horizontal* land bridge?

Is an up-to-date browser secure on an out-of-date OS?

Deal with toxic manager when you can't quit

How can I add encounters in the Lost Mine of Phandelver campaign without giving PCs too much XP?

The Milk Problem

.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;

-1

Food classification. Surely I'm not the only one who cares.

In graduate school, I aligned myself with the P-type semiconductor model of soup. The Silicon atoms are much like the broth of the soup. The holes of the semiconductor can be filled or not. Your electrons play a role similar to that of chicken and noodle in chicken noodle soup. In the case of milk and cereal, you may think of the cereal as electron-like.

Now, in this model, the Silicon is a semiconductor, regardless of the fullness of its holes. We find the same to be true with broth. The broth, whether holding chicken and noodle or not, is still a soup. Tomato soup is no less a soup than minestrone. The property of soupiness is invariant with respect to changes in the occupation of the "holes," to refer back to the model, in the soup.

If we are to admit that cereal and milk are a soup, then it would follow that milk is, on its own, a soup. This would be an absolutely ridiculous conclusion, one that grates the ears of even the most naïve of food classifiers. I would sooner abandon the P-type semiconductor model of soup than accept this repulsive conclusion. This model has endured 30 years of intense scrutiny, from the halls of ETH Zurich to the depths of Monsanto. I stand behind this model and reject the classification of cereal as a soup.

I oftentimes find that poetry captures what prose cannot. I part with a poem, of original content and structure.

cereal or soup

but is cereal a soup

no it's not a soup

soup

share|improve this question

asked 58 mins ago

StSoupAquinasStSoupAquinas

1

New contributor

StSoupAquinas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Not certain this is food related or if there 's a question in there; maybe the Philosophy group?
  
  – Max
  45 secs ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

-1

Food classification. Surely I'm not the only one who cares.

In graduate school, I aligned myself with the P-type semiconductor model of soup. The Silicon atoms are much like the broth of the soup. The holes of the semiconductor can be filled or not. Your electrons play a role similar to that of chicken and noodle in chicken noodle soup. In the case of milk and cereal, you may think of the cereal as electron-like.

Now, in this model, the Silicon is a semiconductor, regardless of the fullness of its holes. We find the same to be true with broth. The broth, whether holding chicken and noodle or not, is still a soup. Tomato soup is no less a soup than minestrone. The property of soupiness is invariant with respect to changes in the occupation of the "holes," to refer back to the model, in the soup.

If we are to admit that cereal and milk are a soup, then it would follow that milk is, on its own, a soup. This would be an absolutely ridiculous conclusion, one that grates the ears of even the most naïve of food classifiers. I would sooner abandon the P-type semiconductor model of soup than accept this repulsive conclusion. This model has endured 30 years of intense scrutiny, from the halls of ETH Zurich to the depths of Monsanto. I stand behind this model and reject the classification of cereal as a soup.

I oftentimes find that poetry captures what prose cannot. I part with a poem, of original content and structure.

cereal or soup

but is cereal a soup

no it's not a soup

soup

share|improve this question

asked 58 mins ago

StSoupAquinasStSoupAquinas

1

New contributor

StSoupAquinas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Not certain this is food related or if there 's a question in there; maybe the Philosophy group?
  
  – Max
  45 secs ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

Food classification. Surely I'm not the only one who cares.

In graduate school, I aligned myself with the P-type semiconductor model of soup. The Silicon atoms are much like the broth of the soup. The holes of the semiconductor can be filled or not. Your electrons play a role similar to that of chicken and noodle in chicken noodle soup. In the case of milk and cereal, you may think of the cereal as electron-like.

Now, in this model, the Silicon is a semiconductor, regardless of the fullness of its holes. We find the same to be true with broth. The broth, whether holding chicken and noodle or not, is still a soup. Tomato soup is no less a soup than minestrone. The property of soupiness is invariant with respect to changes in the occupation of the "holes," to refer back to the model, in the soup.

If we are to admit that cereal and milk are a soup, then it would follow that milk is, on its own, a soup. This would be an absolutely ridiculous conclusion, one that grates the ears of even the most naïve of food classifiers. I would sooner abandon the P-type semiconductor model of soup than accept this repulsive conclusion. This model has endured 30 years of intense scrutiny, from the halls of ETH Zurich to the depths of Monsanto. I stand behind this model and reject the classification of cereal as a soup.

I oftentimes find that poetry captures what prose cannot. I part with a poem, of original content and structure.

cereal or soup

but is cereal a soup

no it's not a soup

soup

share|improve this question

asked 58 mins ago

StSoupAquinasStSoupAquinas

1

New contributor

StSoupAquinas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

share|improve this question

asked 58 mins ago

StSoupAquinasStSoupAquinas

1

New contributor

StSoupAquinas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

share|improve this question

asked 58 mins ago

StSoupAquinasStSoupAquinas

1

New contributor

StSoupAquinas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

asked 58 mins ago

StSoupAquinasStSoupAquinas

1

New contributor

StSoupAquinas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

asked 58 mins ago

StSoupAquinasStSoupAquinas

1