Can I create an upright 7ft x 5ft wall with Minor Illusion?Can I use Minor Illusion to create a wall, hide behind it, and attack with advantage?How does orienting a cube-shaped spell work in three-dimensional space?Can I use Minor Illusion to create a wall, hide behind it, and attack with advantage?When Silent Image Is Disbelieved, Is It Transparent?Can you use Minor Illusion to create an illusion of a working mirror, i.e. with reflection?Minor Illusion as communication meansMinor Illusion as Camouflage?Can Kenku speak with minor illusion?Can Minor Illusion create sounds/images that the caster has never seen or heard?In the Spell “Guards and Wards” is there a size limit on the doors that can be affected as per the limitations on Minor Illusions?How would something passing through an illusion of fog or mist reveal it to be illusory?Does the Major Image spell allow the caster to fill the 20 ft cube with as many “body doubles” as he/she sees fit?

Teaching indefinite integrals that require special-casing

Can I Retrieve Email Addresses from BCC?

Proof of Lemma: Every integer can be written as a product of primes

Is there an Impartial Brexit Deal comparison site?

My boss asked me to take a one-day class, then signs it up as a day off

Can the electrostatic force be infinite in magnitude?

Organic chemistry Iodoform Reaction

For airliners, what prevents wing strikes on landing in bad weather?

I2C signal and power over long range (10meter cable)

Female=gender counterpart?

What (else) happened July 1st 1858 in London?

Pronouncing Homer as in modern Greek

Can a Bard use an arcane focus?

Reply ‘no position’ while the job posting is still there (‘HiWi’ position in Germany)

How to prevent YouTube from showing already watched videos?

Can I rely on these GitHub repository files?

How did Monica know how to operate Carol's "designer"?

What does the "3am" section means in manpages?

Modern Day Chaucer

word describing multiple paths to the same abstract outcome

Latex for-and in equation

The most efficient algorithm to find all possible integer pairs which sum to a given integer

How to interpret the phrase "t’en a fait voir à toi"?

Is there an wasy way to program in Tikz something like the one in the image?



Can I create an upright 7ft x 5ft wall with Minor Illusion?


Can I use Minor Illusion to create a wall, hide behind it, and attack with advantage?How does orienting a cube-shaped spell work in three-dimensional space?Can I use Minor Illusion to create a wall, hide behind it, and attack with advantage?When Silent Image Is Disbelieved, Is It Transparent?Can you use Minor Illusion to create an illusion of a working mirror, i.e. with reflection?Minor Illusion as communication meansMinor Illusion as Camouflage?Can Kenku speak with minor illusion?Can Minor Illusion create sounds/images that the caster has never seen or heard?In the Spell “Guards and Wards” is there a size limit on the doors that can be affected as per the limitations on Minor Illusions?How would something passing through an illusion of fog or mist reveal it to be illusory?Does the Major Image spell allow the caster to fill the 20 ft cube with as many “body doubles” as he/she sees fit?













15












$begingroup$


Minor Illusion states:




Minor Illusion



If you create an image of an object—such as a chair, muddy footprints, or a small chest—it must be no larger than a 5-foot cube. The image can’t create sound, light, smell, or any other sensory effect. Physical interaction with the image reveals it to be an illusion, because things can pass through it.




(emphasis mine). My question is how to interpret this cube. If we rotate the cube vertically so that it looks like a diamond from the side, i.e. the diagonal of the cube is vertical, then a 7ft by 5ft wall would certainly fit, since the diagonal is about 7ft long:



Red is a 5ft cube, blue is a wall 7ft tall, 5ft wide (the width doesn't really matter here)



Is this "layout" of a cube valid? Note that this could potentially change the argument of this answer. Also related.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Sebastian Mendez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 5




    $begingroup$
    I mean... I just like your drawing :) +1
    $endgroup$
    – David Coffron
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Just to be clear is this thing what you mean? (Feel free to use the picture as well if you want, may help some people visualize, not that I'm claiming it can replace your drawing )
    $endgroup$
    – Sdjz
    1 hour ago
















15












$begingroup$


Minor Illusion states:




Minor Illusion



If you create an image of an object—such as a chair, muddy footprints, or a small chest—it must be no larger than a 5-foot cube. The image can’t create sound, light, smell, or any other sensory effect. Physical interaction with the image reveals it to be an illusion, because things can pass through it.




(emphasis mine). My question is how to interpret this cube. If we rotate the cube vertically so that it looks like a diamond from the side, i.e. the diagonal of the cube is vertical, then a 7ft by 5ft wall would certainly fit, since the diagonal is about 7ft long:



Red is a 5ft cube, blue is a wall 7ft tall, 5ft wide (the width doesn't really matter here)



Is this "layout" of a cube valid? Note that this could potentially change the argument of this answer. Also related.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Sebastian Mendez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 5




    $begingroup$
    I mean... I just like your drawing :) +1
    $endgroup$
    – David Coffron
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Just to be clear is this thing what you mean? (Feel free to use the picture as well if you want, may help some people visualize, not that I'm claiming it can replace your drawing )
    $endgroup$
    – Sdjz
    1 hour ago














15












15








15





$begingroup$


Minor Illusion states:




Minor Illusion



If you create an image of an object—such as a chair, muddy footprints, or a small chest—it must be no larger than a 5-foot cube. The image can’t create sound, light, smell, or any other sensory effect. Physical interaction with the image reveals it to be an illusion, because things can pass through it.




(emphasis mine). My question is how to interpret this cube. If we rotate the cube vertically so that it looks like a diamond from the side, i.e. the diagonal of the cube is vertical, then a 7ft by 5ft wall would certainly fit, since the diagonal is about 7ft long:



Red is a 5ft cube, blue is a wall 7ft tall, 5ft wide (the width doesn't really matter here)



Is this "layout" of a cube valid? Note that this could potentially change the argument of this answer. Also related.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Sebastian Mendez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




Minor Illusion states:




Minor Illusion



If you create an image of an object—such as a chair, muddy footprints, or a small chest—it must be no larger than a 5-foot cube. The image can’t create sound, light, smell, or any other sensory effect. Physical interaction with the image reveals it to be an illusion, because things can pass through it.




(emphasis mine). My question is how to interpret this cube. If we rotate the cube vertically so that it looks like a diamond from the side, i.e. the diagonal of the cube is vertical, then a 7ft by 5ft wall would certainly fit, since the diagonal is about 7ft long:



Red is a 5ft cube, blue is a wall 7ft tall, 5ft wide (the width doesn't really matter here)



Is this "layout" of a cube valid? Note that this could potentially change the argument of this answer. Also related.







dnd-5e spells area-of-effect






share|improve this question









New contributor




Sebastian Mendez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Sebastian Mendez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 hours ago







Sebastian Mendez













New contributor




Sebastian Mendez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 hours ago









Sebastian MendezSebastian Mendez

1763




1763




New contributor




Sebastian Mendez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Sebastian Mendez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Sebastian Mendez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 5




    $begingroup$
    I mean... I just like your drawing :) +1
    $endgroup$
    – David Coffron
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Just to be clear is this thing what you mean? (Feel free to use the picture as well if you want, may help some people visualize, not that I'm claiming it can replace your drawing )
    $endgroup$
    – Sdjz
    1 hour ago













  • 5




    $begingroup$
    I mean... I just like your drawing :) +1
    $endgroup$
    – David Coffron
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Just to be clear is this thing what you mean? (Feel free to use the picture as well if you want, may help some people visualize, not that I'm claiming it can replace your drawing )
    $endgroup$
    – Sdjz
    1 hour ago








5




5




$begingroup$
I mean... I just like your drawing :) +1
$endgroup$
– David Coffron
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
I mean... I just like your drawing :) +1
$endgroup$
– David Coffron
2 hours ago












$begingroup$
Just to be clear is this thing what you mean? (Feel free to use the picture as well if you want, may help some people visualize, not that I'm claiming it can replace your drawing )
$endgroup$
– Sdjz
1 hour ago





$begingroup$
Just to be clear is this thing what you mean? (Feel free to use the picture as well if you want, may help some people visualize, not that I'm claiming it can replace your drawing )
$endgroup$
– Sdjz
1 hour ago











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















12












$begingroup$

Yes, though a DM might not want to deal with abnormal spell positioning



In the Sage Advice compendium, a similar question was asked about the spell Cloud of Daggers:




Using 5-foot squares, does cloud of daggers affect a single square? Cloud of daggers (5 ft. cube) can affect more than one square on a grid, unless the DM says effects snap to the grid. There are many ways to position that cube.




While the Sage Advice article deals with a different spell, the matter is directly related to your question. To wit: "non-snapped" positioning of a spell's area of effect is legal, strictly speaking, though it might not fly with a DM who can house-rule otherwise.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Why would it have a gap in the bottom? I assume you could make the wall/object pointy, so it fits in the edge of the cube.
    $endgroup$
    – Sebastian Mendez
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    The wall is the blue part, and is rectangular.
    $endgroup$
    – Davo
    1 hour ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Oh, I misunderstood. I thought the wall was a cube turned on its edge to create a 7' tall barrier using the hypotenuse. Even so, it is contained within a 5' x 5' x 5' cube so it would be legal per my answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Rykara
    1 hour ago


















-1












$begingroup$

The answer is technically yes. Due to the wording of the spell, if the object (illusion) that you want to create fits within the 5 ft cube, you can use the spell to create it. However, like all interpretations of the rules in DnD, the DM makes the final decision. Especially in this scenario, the DM might decide that the theoretical cube (the size requirement) must be placed flat on the ground or something like that. What I'm trying to say, is that even if the DM allows it, they might not let it work the way that you want.
Good Question, I really love that you are using your math to find loopholes in the rules, I'll have to remember to do that myself in the future. Hope this helped!






share|improve this answer










New contributor




Smart_TJ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$












    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "122"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    Sebastian Mendez is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143902%2fcan-i-create-an-upright-7ft-x-5ft-wall-with-minor-illusion%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    12












    $begingroup$

    Yes, though a DM might not want to deal with abnormal spell positioning



    In the Sage Advice compendium, a similar question was asked about the spell Cloud of Daggers:




    Using 5-foot squares, does cloud of daggers affect a single square? Cloud of daggers (5 ft. cube) can affect more than one square on a grid, unless the DM says effects snap to the grid. There are many ways to position that cube.




    While the Sage Advice article deals with a different spell, the matter is directly related to your question. To wit: "non-snapped" positioning of a spell's area of effect is legal, strictly speaking, though it might not fly with a DM who can house-rule otherwise.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Why would it have a gap in the bottom? I assume you could make the wall/object pointy, so it fits in the edge of the cube.
      $endgroup$
      – Sebastian Mendez
      2 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      The wall is the blue part, and is rectangular.
      $endgroup$
      – Davo
      1 hour ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Oh, I misunderstood. I thought the wall was a cube turned on its edge to create a 7' tall barrier using the hypotenuse. Even so, it is contained within a 5' x 5' x 5' cube so it would be legal per my answer.
      $endgroup$
      – Rykara
      1 hour ago















    12












    $begingroup$

    Yes, though a DM might not want to deal with abnormal spell positioning



    In the Sage Advice compendium, a similar question was asked about the spell Cloud of Daggers:




    Using 5-foot squares, does cloud of daggers affect a single square? Cloud of daggers (5 ft. cube) can affect more than one square on a grid, unless the DM says effects snap to the grid. There are many ways to position that cube.




    While the Sage Advice article deals with a different spell, the matter is directly related to your question. To wit: "non-snapped" positioning of a spell's area of effect is legal, strictly speaking, though it might not fly with a DM who can house-rule otherwise.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Why would it have a gap in the bottom? I assume you could make the wall/object pointy, so it fits in the edge of the cube.
      $endgroup$
      – Sebastian Mendez
      2 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      The wall is the blue part, and is rectangular.
      $endgroup$
      – Davo
      1 hour ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Oh, I misunderstood. I thought the wall was a cube turned on its edge to create a 7' tall barrier using the hypotenuse. Even so, it is contained within a 5' x 5' x 5' cube so it would be legal per my answer.
      $endgroup$
      – Rykara
      1 hour ago













    12












    12








    12





    $begingroup$

    Yes, though a DM might not want to deal with abnormal spell positioning



    In the Sage Advice compendium, a similar question was asked about the spell Cloud of Daggers:




    Using 5-foot squares, does cloud of daggers affect a single square? Cloud of daggers (5 ft. cube) can affect more than one square on a grid, unless the DM says effects snap to the grid. There are many ways to position that cube.




    While the Sage Advice article deals with a different spell, the matter is directly related to your question. To wit: "non-snapped" positioning of a spell's area of effect is legal, strictly speaking, though it might not fly with a DM who can house-rule otherwise.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Yes, though a DM might not want to deal with abnormal spell positioning



    In the Sage Advice compendium, a similar question was asked about the spell Cloud of Daggers:




    Using 5-foot squares, does cloud of daggers affect a single square? Cloud of daggers (5 ft. cube) can affect more than one square on a grid, unless the DM says effects snap to the grid. There are many ways to position that cube.




    While the Sage Advice article deals with a different spell, the matter is directly related to your question. To wit: "non-snapped" positioning of a spell's area of effect is legal, strictly speaking, though it might not fly with a DM who can house-rule otherwise.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 1 hour ago

























    answered 2 hours ago









    RykaraRykara

    4,502939




    4,502939







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Why would it have a gap in the bottom? I assume you could make the wall/object pointy, so it fits in the edge of the cube.
      $endgroup$
      – Sebastian Mendez
      2 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      The wall is the blue part, and is rectangular.
      $endgroup$
      – Davo
      1 hour ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Oh, I misunderstood. I thought the wall was a cube turned on its edge to create a 7' tall barrier using the hypotenuse. Even so, it is contained within a 5' x 5' x 5' cube so it would be legal per my answer.
      $endgroup$
      – Rykara
      1 hour ago












    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Why would it have a gap in the bottom? I assume you could make the wall/object pointy, so it fits in the edge of the cube.
      $endgroup$
      – Sebastian Mendez
      2 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      The wall is the blue part, and is rectangular.
      $endgroup$
      – Davo
      1 hour ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Oh, I misunderstood. I thought the wall was a cube turned on its edge to create a 7' tall barrier using the hypotenuse. Even so, it is contained within a 5' x 5' x 5' cube so it would be legal per my answer.
      $endgroup$
      – Rykara
      1 hour ago







    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    Why would it have a gap in the bottom? I assume you could make the wall/object pointy, so it fits in the edge of the cube.
    $endgroup$
    – Sebastian Mendez
    2 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    Why would it have a gap in the bottom? I assume you could make the wall/object pointy, so it fits in the edge of the cube.
    $endgroup$
    – Sebastian Mendez
    2 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    The wall is the blue part, and is rectangular.
    $endgroup$
    – Davo
    1 hour ago




    $begingroup$
    The wall is the blue part, and is rectangular.
    $endgroup$
    – Davo
    1 hour ago




    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    Oh, I misunderstood. I thought the wall was a cube turned on its edge to create a 7' tall barrier using the hypotenuse. Even so, it is contained within a 5' x 5' x 5' cube so it would be legal per my answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Rykara
    1 hour ago




    $begingroup$
    Oh, I misunderstood. I thought the wall was a cube turned on its edge to create a 7' tall barrier using the hypotenuse. Even so, it is contained within a 5' x 5' x 5' cube so it would be legal per my answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Rykara
    1 hour ago













    -1












    $begingroup$

    The answer is technically yes. Due to the wording of the spell, if the object (illusion) that you want to create fits within the 5 ft cube, you can use the spell to create it. However, like all interpretations of the rules in DnD, the DM makes the final decision. Especially in this scenario, the DM might decide that the theoretical cube (the size requirement) must be placed flat on the ground or something like that. What I'm trying to say, is that even if the DM allows it, they might not let it work the way that you want.
    Good Question, I really love that you are using your math to find loopholes in the rules, I'll have to remember to do that myself in the future. Hope this helped!






    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    Smart_TJ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$

















      -1












      $begingroup$

      The answer is technically yes. Due to the wording of the spell, if the object (illusion) that you want to create fits within the 5 ft cube, you can use the spell to create it. However, like all interpretations of the rules in DnD, the DM makes the final decision. Especially in this scenario, the DM might decide that the theoretical cube (the size requirement) must be placed flat on the ground or something like that. What I'm trying to say, is that even if the DM allows it, they might not let it work the way that you want.
      Good Question, I really love that you are using your math to find loopholes in the rules, I'll have to remember to do that myself in the future. Hope this helped!






      share|improve this answer










      New contributor




      Smart_TJ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      $endgroup$















        -1












        -1








        -1





        $begingroup$

        The answer is technically yes. Due to the wording of the spell, if the object (illusion) that you want to create fits within the 5 ft cube, you can use the spell to create it. However, like all interpretations of the rules in DnD, the DM makes the final decision. Especially in this scenario, the DM might decide that the theoretical cube (the size requirement) must be placed flat on the ground or something like that. What I'm trying to say, is that even if the DM allows it, they might not let it work the way that you want.
        Good Question, I really love that you are using your math to find loopholes in the rules, I'll have to remember to do that myself in the future. Hope this helped!






        share|improve this answer










        New contributor




        Smart_TJ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        $endgroup$



        The answer is technically yes. Due to the wording of the spell, if the object (illusion) that you want to create fits within the 5 ft cube, you can use the spell to create it. However, like all interpretations of the rules in DnD, the DM makes the final decision. Especially in this scenario, the DM might decide that the theoretical cube (the size requirement) must be placed flat on the ground or something like that. What I'm trying to say, is that even if the DM allows it, they might not let it work the way that you want.
        Good Question, I really love that you are using your math to find loopholes in the rules, I'll have to remember to do that myself in the future. Hope this helped!







        share|improve this answer










        New contributor




        Smart_TJ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 13 mins ago





















        New contributor




        Smart_TJ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        answered 43 mins ago









        Smart_TJSmart_TJ

        467




        467




        New contributor




        Smart_TJ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





        New contributor





        Smart_TJ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        Smart_TJ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.




















            Sebastian Mendez is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Sebastian Mendez is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Sebastian Mendez is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            Sebastian Mendez is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143902%2fcan-i-create-an-upright-7ft-x-5ft-wall-with-minor-illusion%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Category:Fedor von Bock Media in category "Fedor von Bock"Navigation menuUpload mediaISNI: 0000 0000 5511 3417VIAF ID: 24712551GND ID: 119294796Library of Congress authority ID: n96068363BnF ID: 12534305fSUDOC authorities ID: 034604189Open Library ID: OL338253ANKCR AUT ID: jn19990000869National Library of Israel ID: 000514068National Thesaurus for Author Names ID: 341574317ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

            Reverse int within the 32-bit signed integer range: [−2^31, 2^31 − 1]Combining two 32-bit integers into one 64-bit integerDetermine if an int is within rangeLossy packing 32 bit integer to 16 bitComputing the square root of a 64-bit integerKeeping integer addition within boundsSafe multiplication of two 64-bit signed integersLeetcode 10: Regular Expression MatchingSigned integer-to-ascii x86_64 assembler macroReverse the digits of an Integer“Add two numbers given in reverse order from a linked list”

            Log på Navigationsmenu