Shouldn't “much” here be used instead of “more”? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In“bigger” vs. “more big”Easier and much easier troubleone of the more fascinatingUse of “-er” or the word “more” to make comparative formsThe pattern of quite as adjective asBetter, more better or much better, which is correct?“A little too (much) young” vs “A little bit too (much) young” vs “a bit too (much) young”What should be used with a person or 3rd person , comparative degree or simple form of adjective

Can a rogue use sneak attack with weapons that have the thrown property even if they are not thrown?

Are spiders unable to hurt humans, especially very small spiders?

Why is the maximum length of OpenWrt’s root password 8 characters?

Did 3000BC Egyptians use meteoric iron weapons?

"as much details as you can remember"

Why not take a picture of a closer black hole?

What to do when moving next to a bird sanctuary with a loosely-domesticated cat?

Why isn't the circumferential light around the M87 black hole's event horizon symmetric?

For what reasons would an animal species NOT cross a *horizontal* land bridge?

Did Scotland spend $250,000 for the slogan "Welcome to Scotland"?

Why do UK politicians seemingly ignore opinion polls on Brexit?

Does the shape of a die affect the probability of a number being rolled?

Protecting Dualbooting Windows from dangerous code (like rm -rf)

Right tool to dig six foot holes?

How to manage monthly salary

Are there any other methods to apply to solving simultaneous equations?

Does a dangling wire really electrocute me if I'm standing in water?

When should I buy a clipper card after flying to OAK?

Is an up-to-date browser secure on an out-of-date OS?

Did Section 31 appear in Star Trek: The Next Generation?

Why was M87 targetted for the Event Horizon Telescope instead of Sagittarius A*?

What is the most effective way of iterating a std::vector and why?

Is this app Icon Browser Safe/Legit?

Looking for Correct Greek Translation for Heraclitus



Shouldn't “much” here be used instead of “more”?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In“bigger” vs. “more big”Easier and much easier troubleone of the more fascinatingUse of “-er” or the word “more” to make comparative formsThe pattern of quite as adjective asBetter, more better or much better, which is correct?“A little too (much) young” vs “A little bit too (much) young” vs “a bit too (much) young”What should be used with a person or 3rd person , comparative degree or simple form of adjective



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








5















I read a sentence in a chapter named "The Last Lesson" which was:




It was because they were sorry, too, that they had not gone to school more.




More is a comparative adjective. So I wonder in the sentence, it is not clear 'more than what?'. I think it has been used in a wrong way here and the author wanted to convey the sense of much. Am I right?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Kelvin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.


























    5















    I read a sentence in a chapter named "The Last Lesson" which was:




    It was because they were sorry, too, that they had not gone to school more.




    More is a comparative adjective. So I wonder in the sentence, it is not clear 'more than what?'. I think it has been used in a wrong way here and the author wanted to convey the sense of much. Am I right?










    share|improve this question









    New contributor




    Kelvin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






















      5












      5








      5








      I read a sentence in a chapter named "The Last Lesson" which was:




      It was because they were sorry, too, that they had not gone to school more.




      More is a comparative adjective. So I wonder in the sentence, it is not clear 'more than what?'. I think it has been used in a wrong way here and the author wanted to convey the sense of much. Am I right?










      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Kelvin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      I read a sentence in a chapter named "The Last Lesson" which was:




      It was because they were sorry, too, that they had not gone to school more.




      More is a comparative adjective. So I wonder in the sentence, it is not clear 'more than what?'. I think it has been used in a wrong way here and the author wanted to convey the sense of much. Am I right?







      comparative-degree






      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Kelvin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Kelvin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 11 hours ago









      Hellion

      17.5k33970




      17.5k33970






      New contributor




      Kelvin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 15 hours ago









      KelvinKelvin

      622




      622




      New contributor




      Kelvin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Kelvin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Kelvin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          9














          In this case, it's referring to the number of times they did go to school. The more is in comparison to whatever the reality of the situation actually is.



          For instance:




          However many vegetables you eat, you can always eat more.




          Or, in the sentence in question:




          It was because they were sorry, too, that they had not gone to school more [than they did].




          The explicitly missing words are generally assumed to exist.






          share|improve this answer






























            7















            It was because they were sorry, too, that they had not gone to school more.




            This is a grammatical sentence whose meaning is clear. When more is used this way - “they didn’t do X more” it means “they didn’t do X more than they did”. To be more explicit, for this particular sentence:




            It was because they were sorry, too, that they had not gone to school more than they had gone to school.




            It would be redundant to say (or write) that whole sentence; more by itself conveys this meaning.



            not much is different - it just means “not a lot”. In this context they were probably sorry they had not gone to school much but we don’t know that for sure. Maybe they did go to school much of the time, but still regretted not going to school more than they did.






            share|improve this answer


















            • 1





              +1 for explaining the difference in meaning that "much" would have.

              – ColleenV
              10 hours ago











            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "481"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );






            Kelvin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f204840%2fshouldnt-much-here-be-used-instead-of-more%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            9














            In this case, it's referring to the number of times they did go to school. The more is in comparison to whatever the reality of the situation actually is.



            For instance:




            However many vegetables you eat, you can always eat more.




            Or, in the sentence in question:




            It was because they were sorry, too, that they had not gone to school more [than they did].




            The explicitly missing words are generally assumed to exist.






            share|improve this answer



























              9














              In this case, it's referring to the number of times they did go to school. The more is in comparison to whatever the reality of the situation actually is.



              For instance:




              However many vegetables you eat, you can always eat more.




              Or, in the sentence in question:




              It was because they were sorry, too, that they had not gone to school more [than they did].




              The explicitly missing words are generally assumed to exist.






              share|improve this answer

























                9












                9








                9







                In this case, it's referring to the number of times they did go to school. The more is in comparison to whatever the reality of the situation actually is.



                For instance:




                However many vegetables you eat, you can always eat more.




                Or, in the sentence in question:




                It was because they were sorry, too, that they had not gone to school more [than they did].




                The explicitly missing words are generally assumed to exist.






                share|improve this answer













                In this case, it's referring to the number of times they did go to school. The more is in comparison to whatever the reality of the situation actually is.



                For instance:




                However many vegetables you eat, you can always eat more.




                Or, in the sentence in question:




                It was because they were sorry, too, that they had not gone to school more [than they did].




                The explicitly missing words are generally assumed to exist.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 15 hours ago









                Jason BassfordJason Bassford

                17.5k22340




                17.5k22340























                    7















                    It was because they were sorry, too, that they had not gone to school more.




                    This is a grammatical sentence whose meaning is clear. When more is used this way - “they didn’t do X more” it means “they didn’t do X more than they did”. To be more explicit, for this particular sentence:




                    It was because they were sorry, too, that they had not gone to school more than they had gone to school.




                    It would be redundant to say (or write) that whole sentence; more by itself conveys this meaning.



                    not much is different - it just means “not a lot”. In this context they were probably sorry they had not gone to school much but we don’t know that for sure. Maybe they did go to school much of the time, but still regretted not going to school more than they did.






                    share|improve this answer


















                    • 1





                      +1 for explaining the difference in meaning that "much" would have.

                      – ColleenV
                      10 hours ago















                    7















                    It was because they were sorry, too, that they had not gone to school more.




                    This is a grammatical sentence whose meaning is clear. When more is used this way - “they didn’t do X more” it means “they didn’t do X more than they did”. To be more explicit, for this particular sentence:




                    It was because they were sorry, too, that they had not gone to school more than they had gone to school.




                    It would be redundant to say (or write) that whole sentence; more by itself conveys this meaning.



                    not much is different - it just means “not a lot”. In this context they were probably sorry they had not gone to school much but we don’t know that for sure. Maybe they did go to school much of the time, but still regretted not going to school more than they did.






                    share|improve this answer


















                    • 1





                      +1 for explaining the difference in meaning that "much" would have.

                      – ColleenV
                      10 hours ago













                    7












                    7








                    7








                    It was because they were sorry, too, that they had not gone to school more.




                    This is a grammatical sentence whose meaning is clear. When more is used this way - “they didn’t do X more” it means “they didn’t do X more than they did”. To be more explicit, for this particular sentence:




                    It was because they were sorry, too, that they had not gone to school more than they had gone to school.




                    It would be redundant to say (or write) that whole sentence; more by itself conveys this meaning.



                    not much is different - it just means “not a lot”. In this context they were probably sorry they had not gone to school much but we don’t know that for sure. Maybe they did go to school much of the time, but still regretted not going to school more than they did.






                    share|improve this answer














                    It was because they were sorry, too, that they had not gone to school more.




                    This is a grammatical sentence whose meaning is clear. When more is used this way - “they didn’t do X more” it means “they didn’t do X more than they did”. To be more explicit, for this particular sentence:




                    It was because they were sorry, too, that they had not gone to school more than they had gone to school.




                    It would be redundant to say (or write) that whole sentence; more by itself conveys this meaning.



                    not much is different - it just means “not a lot”. In this context they were probably sorry they had not gone to school much but we don’t know that for sure. Maybe they did go to school much of the time, but still regretted not going to school more than they did.







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered 15 hours ago









                    MixolydianMixolydian

                    5,496715




                    5,496715







                    • 1





                      +1 for explaining the difference in meaning that "much" would have.

                      – ColleenV
                      10 hours ago












                    • 1





                      +1 for explaining the difference in meaning that "much" would have.

                      – ColleenV
                      10 hours ago







                    1




                    1





                    +1 for explaining the difference in meaning that "much" would have.

                    – ColleenV
                    10 hours ago





                    +1 for explaining the difference in meaning that "much" would have.

                    – ColleenV
                    10 hours ago










                    Kelvin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                    draft saved

                    draft discarded


















                    Kelvin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                    Kelvin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                    Kelvin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                    Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f204840%2fshouldnt-much-here-be-used-instead-of-more%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Reverse int within the 32-bit signed integer range: [−2^31, 2^31 − 1]Combining two 32-bit integers into one 64-bit integerDetermine if an int is within rangeLossy packing 32 bit integer to 16 bitComputing the square root of a 64-bit integerKeeping integer addition within boundsSafe multiplication of two 64-bit signed integersLeetcode 10: Regular Expression MatchingSigned integer-to-ascii x86_64 assembler macroReverse the digits of an Integer“Add two numbers given in reverse order from a linked list”

                    Category:Fedor von Bock Media in category "Fedor von Bock"Navigation menuUpload mediaISNI: 0000 0000 5511 3417VIAF ID: 24712551GND ID: 119294796Library of Congress authority ID: n96068363BnF ID: 12534305fSUDOC authorities ID: 034604189Open Library ID: OL338253ANKCR AUT ID: jn19990000869National Library of Israel ID: 000514068National Thesaurus for Author Names ID: 341574317ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

                    Kiel Indholdsfortegnelse Historie | Transport og færgeforbindelser | Sejlsport og anden sport | Kultur | Kendte personer fra Kiel | Noter | Litteratur | Eksterne henvisninger | Navigationsmenuwww.kiel.de54°19′31″N 10°8′26″Ø / 54.32528°N 10.14056°Ø / 54.32528; 10.14056Oberbürgermeister Dr. Ulf Kämpferwww.statistik-nord.deDen danske Stats StatistikKiels hjemmesiderrrWorldCat312794080n790547494030481-4