Why didn't the Event Horizon Telescope team mention Sagittarius A*? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InWhy not take a picture of a closer black hole?Why don't Neutron Stars form event horizon?Does matter accumulate just outside the event horizon of a black hole?What conditions would lead to this event around the black hole in the Pictor A galaxy?Does conservation of energy make black holes impossible?How does the Event Horizon Telescope implement the interferometry?Whats the deal with black holes and “no information from inside the event horizon can leave”?What defines the plane of an accretion disk around a black hole?Black hole, escape velocity, going up?Event Horizon Telescope: Photo Announced For Next WeekWhy did the Event Horizon Telescope take so long to take a photo of a black hole?

Origin of "cooter" meaning "vagina"

Pokemon Turn Based battle (Python)

Worn-tile Scrabble

Did Section 31 appear in Star Trek: The Next Generation?

How are circuits which use complex ICs normally simulated?

Did Scotland spend $250,000 for the slogan "Welcome to Scotland"?

Where to refill my bottle in India?

How to notate time signature switching consistently every measure

Is an up-to-date browser secure on an out-of-date OS?

FPGA - DIY Programming

The difference between dialogue marks

During Temple times, who can butcher a kosher animal?

Can you compress metal and what would be the consequences?

Do these rules for Critical Successes and Critical Failures seem Fair?

Falsification in Math vs Science

Why isn't the circumferential light around the M87 black hole's event horizon symmetric?

What does ひと匙 mean in this manga and has it been used colloquially?

How to answer pointed "are you quitting" questioning when I don't want them to suspect

Why do UK politicians seemingly ignore opinion polls on Brexit?

Is three citations per paragraph excessive for undergraduate research paper?

What is the meaning of the verb "bear" in this context?

What is the most effective way of iterating a std::vector and why?

What to do when moving next to a bird sanctuary with a loosely-domesticated cat?

Resizing object distorts it (Illustrator CC 2018)



Why didn't the Event Horizon Telescope team mention Sagittarius A*?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InWhy not take a picture of a closer black hole?Why don't Neutron Stars form event horizon?Does matter accumulate just outside the event horizon of a black hole?What conditions would lead to this event around the black hole in the Pictor A galaxy?Does conservation of energy make black holes impossible?How does the Event Horizon Telescope implement the interferometry?Whats the deal with black holes and “no information from inside the event horizon can leave”?What defines the plane of an accretion disk around a black hole?Black hole, escape velocity, going up?Event Horizon Telescope: Photo Announced For Next WeekWhy did the Event Horizon Telescope take so long to take a photo of a black hole?










9












$begingroup$


At the press conference this morning, the Event Horizon Telescope team did not say much about Sagittarius A*, which was the target many of us have we been waiting for.



Is there any explanation anywhere for this omission?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    9












    $begingroup$


    At the press conference this morning, the Event Horizon Telescope team did not say much about Sagittarius A*, which was the target many of us have we been waiting for.



    Is there any explanation anywhere for this omission?










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      9












      9








      9


      1



      $begingroup$


      At the press conference this morning, the Event Horizon Telescope team did not say much about Sagittarius A*, which was the target many of us have we been waiting for.



      Is there any explanation anywhere for this omission?










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      At the press conference this morning, the Event Horizon Telescope team did not say much about Sagittarius A*, which was the target many of us have we been waiting for.



      Is there any explanation anywhere for this omission?







      black-hole supermassive-black-hole sagittarius-a event-horizon-telescope






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 11 hours ago









      HDE 226868

      20.7k268130




      20.7k268130










      asked 11 hours ago









      White PrimeWhite Prime

      1438




      1438




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          18












          $begingroup$

          There was a mention of Sagittarius A* during the Q+A portion of the press conference; the team indicated that they hope to produce an image sometime in the future (although they were careful to make no promises, and they're not assuming they'll be successful).



          That said, I'm not wholly surprised that we ended up seeing M87, rather than Sgr A*, for a couple reasons which the team mentions in their first paper:



          • As Glorfindel said, Sgr A*'s event horizon is much smaller, meaning matter orbiting the black hole has a shorter orbital period. This contributes to variability on the timescale of minutes. The observations of M87 took place over the course of a week - roughly the timescale over which that target varies, meaning the source should not change significantly over that time.

          • Second - and this is the reason I've seen cited more often - Sgr A* lies in the center of our galaxy, and so thick clouds of gas and dust lie between it and us. That results in scattering, which is a problem. There are ways to mitigate this, of course, and the team has spent a long time on this, but it's simpler to just look at the black hole that doesn't have that problem in the first place. That's why M87's black hole is an attractive target.

          Neither of these are impossible hurdles to overcome, but they're certainly very real difficulties that can't be ignored.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$




















            10












            $begingroup$

            I've found an explanation in Dutch here by Heino Falcke, one of the EHT founders. Translation:




            Hard to photograph



            It was easiest to take a picture of M87. "It is very difficult to photograph the black hole in our Milky Way, because the material around it moves very fast: the vortex rotates around its axis in 20 minutes. Compare it to a toddler who has to sit still for hours to be photographed: that's not possible. With M87, the matter revolves around the hole in two days, so it's easier to photograph", says Falcke.





            (The original text is as follows:)




            Lastig te fotograferen



            Het lukte het beste om een foto te maken van M87. "Het is heel lastig om het zwarte gat in onze Melkweg op de foto te zetten, doordat de materie daaromheen heel snel beweegt: de draaikolk draait in 20 minuten om zijn as. Vergelijk het met een kleuter die urenlang stil moet zitten om op de foto te gaan: dat gaat niet. Bij M87 draait de materie in twee dagen om het gat heen, dus dat is makkelijker te fotograferen", zegt Falcke.







            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              );
              );
              , "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "514"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fastronomy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f30313%2fwhy-didnt-the-event-horizon-telescope-team-mention-sagittarius-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              18












              $begingroup$

              There was a mention of Sagittarius A* during the Q+A portion of the press conference; the team indicated that they hope to produce an image sometime in the future (although they were careful to make no promises, and they're not assuming they'll be successful).



              That said, I'm not wholly surprised that we ended up seeing M87, rather than Sgr A*, for a couple reasons which the team mentions in their first paper:



              • As Glorfindel said, Sgr A*'s event horizon is much smaller, meaning matter orbiting the black hole has a shorter orbital period. This contributes to variability on the timescale of minutes. The observations of M87 took place over the course of a week - roughly the timescale over which that target varies, meaning the source should not change significantly over that time.

              • Second - and this is the reason I've seen cited more often - Sgr A* lies in the center of our galaxy, and so thick clouds of gas and dust lie between it and us. That results in scattering, which is a problem. There are ways to mitigate this, of course, and the team has spent a long time on this, but it's simpler to just look at the black hole that doesn't have that problem in the first place. That's why M87's black hole is an attractive target.

              Neither of these are impossible hurdles to overcome, but they're certainly very real difficulties that can't be ignored.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$

















                18












                $begingroup$

                There was a mention of Sagittarius A* during the Q+A portion of the press conference; the team indicated that they hope to produce an image sometime in the future (although they were careful to make no promises, and they're not assuming they'll be successful).



                That said, I'm not wholly surprised that we ended up seeing M87, rather than Sgr A*, for a couple reasons which the team mentions in their first paper:



                • As Glorfindel said, Sgr A*'s event horizon is much smaller, meaning matter orbiting the black hole has a shorter orbital period. This contributes to variability on the timescale of minutes. The observations of M87 took place over the course of a week - roughly the timescale over which that target varies, meaning the source should not change significantly over that time.

                • Second - and this is the reason I've seen cited more often - Sgr A* lies in the center of our galaxy, and so thick clouds of gas and dust lie between it and us. That results in scattering, which is a problem. There are ways to mitigate this, of course, and the team has spent a long time on this, but it's simpler to just look at the black hole that doesn't have that problem in the first place. That's why M87's black hole is an attractive target.

                Neither of these are impossible hurdles to overcome, but they're certainly very real difficulties that can't be ignored.






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$















                  18












                  18








                  18





                  $begingroup$

                  There was a mention of Sagittarius A* during the Q+A portion of the press conference; the team indicated that they hope to produce an image sometime in the future (although they were careful to make no promises, and they're not assuming they'll be successful).



                  That said, I'm not wholly surprised that we ended up seeing M87, rather than Sgr A*, for a couple reasons which the team mentions in their first paper:



                  • As Glorfindel said, Sgr A*'s event horizon is much smaller, meaning matter orbiting the black hole has a shorter orbital period. This contributes to variability on the timescale of minutes. The observations of M87 took place over the course of a week - roughly the timescale over which that target varies, meaning the source should not change significantly over that time.

                  • Second - and this is the reason I've seen cited more often - Sgr A* lies in the center of our galaxy, and so thick clouds of gas and dust lie between it and us. That results in scattering, which is a problem. There are ways to mitigate this, of course, and the team has spent a long time on this, but it's simpler to just look at the black hole that doesn't have that problem in the first place. That's why M87's black hole is an attractive target.

                  Neither of these are impossible hurdles to overcome, but they're certainly very real difficulties that can't be ignored.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  There was a mention of Sagittarius A* during the Q+A portion of the press conference; the team indicated that they hope to produce an image sometime in the future (although they were careful to make no promises, and they're not assuming they'll be successful).



                  That said, I'm not wholly surprised that we ended up seeing M87, rather than Sgr A*, for a couple reasons which the team mentions in their first paper:



                  • As Glorfindel said, Sgr A*'s event horizon is much smaller, meaning matter orbiting the black hole has a shorter orbital period. This contributes to variability on the timescale of minutes. The observations of M87 took place over the course of a week - roughly the timescale over which that target varies, meaning the source should not change significantly over that time.

                  • Second - and this is the reason I've seen cited more often - Sgr A* lies in the center of our galaxy, and so thick clouds of gas and dust lie between it and us. That results in scattering, which is a problem. There are ways to mitigate this, of course, and the team has spent a long time on this, but it's simpler to just look at the black hole that doesn't have that problem in the first place. That's why M87's black hole is an attractive target.

                  Neither of these are impossible hurdles to overcome, but they're certainly very real difficulties that can't be ignored.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 5 hours ago

























                  answered 11 hours ago









                  HDE 226868HDE 226868

                  20.7k268130




                  20.7k268130





















                      10












                      $begingroup$

                      I've found an explanation in Dutch here by Heino Falcke, one of the EHT founders. Translation:




                      Hard to photograph



                      It was easiest to take a picture of M87. "It is very difficult to photograph the black hole in our Milky Way, because the material around it moves very fast: the vortex rotates around its axis in 20 minutes. Compare it to a toddler who has to sit still for hours to be photographed: that's not possible. With M87, the matter revolves around the hole in two days, so it's easier to photograph", says Falcke.





                      (The original text is as follows:)




                      Lastig te fotograferen



                      Het lukte het beste om een foto te maken van M87. "Het is heel lastig om het zwarte gat in onze Melkweg op de foto te zetten, doordat de materie daaromheen heel snel beweegt: de draaikolk draait in 20 minuten om zijn as. Vergelijk het met een kleuter die urenlang stil moet zitten om op de foto te gaan: dat gaat niet. Bij M87 draait de materie in twee dagen om het gat heen, dus dat is makkelijker te fotograferen", zegt Falcke.







                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$

















                        10












                        $begingroup$

                        I've found an explanation in Dutch here by Heino Falcke, one of the EHT founders. Translation:




                        Hard to photograph



                        It was easiest to take a picture of M87. "It is very difficult to photograph the black hole in our Milky Way, because the material around it moves very fast: the vortex rotates around its axis in 20 minutes. Compare it to a toddler who has to sit still for hours to be photographed: that's not possible. With M87, the matter revolves around the hole in two days, so it's easier to photograph", says Falcke.





                        (The original text is as follows:)




                        Lastig te fotograferen



                        Het lukte het beste om een foto te maken van M87. "Het is heel lastig om het zwarte gat in onze Melkweg op de foto te zetten, doordat de materie daaromheen heel snel beweegt: de draaikolk draait in 20 minuten om zijn as. Vergelijk het met een kleuter die urenlang stil moet zitten om op de foto te gaan: dat gaat niet. Bij M87 draait de materie in twee dagen om het gat heen, dus dat is makkelijker te fotograferen", zegt Falcke.







                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$















                          10












                          10








                          10





                          $begingroup$

                          I've found an explanation in Dutch here by Heino Falcke, one of the EHT founders. Translation:




                          Hard to photograph



                          It was easiest to take a picture of M87. "It is very difficult to photograph the black hole in our Milky Way, because the material around it moves very fast: the vortex rotates around its axis in 20 minutes. Compare it to a toddler who has to sit still for hours to be photographed: that's not possible. With M87, the matter revolves around the hole in two days, so it's easier to photograph", says Falcke.





                          (The original text is as follows:)




                          Lastig te fotograferen



                          Het lukte het beste om een foto te maken van M87. "Het is heel lastig om het zwarte gat in onze Melkweg op de foto te zetten, doordat de materie daaromheen heel snel beweegt: de draaikolk draait in 20 minuten om zijn as. Vergelijk het met een kleuter die urenlang stil moet zitten om op de foto te gaan: dat gaat niet. Bij M87 draait de materie in twee dagen om het gat heen, dus dat is makkelijker te fotograferen", zegt Falcke.







                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          I've found an explanation in Dutch here by Heino Falcke, one of the EHT founders. Translation:




                          Hard to photograph



                          It was easiest to take a picture of M87. "It is very difficult to photograph the black hole in our Milky Way, because the material around it moves very fast: the vortex rotates around its axis in 20 minutes. Compare it to a toddler who has to sit still for hours to be photographed: that's not possible. With M87, the matter revolves around the hole in two days, so it's easier to photograph", says Falcke.





                          (The original text is as follows:)




                          Lastig te fotograferen



                          Het lukte het beste om een foto te maken van M87. "Het is heel lastig om het zwarte gat in onze Melkweg op de foto te zetten, doordat de materie daaromheen heel snel beweegt: de draaikolk draait in 20 minuten om zijn as. Vergelijk het met een kleuter die urenlang stil moet zitten om op de foto te gaan: dat gaat niet. Bij M87 draait de materie in twee dagen om het gat heen, dus dat is makkelijker te fotograferen", zegt Falcke.








                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered 11 hours ago









                          GlorfindelGlorfindel

                          2,1182926




                          2,1182926



























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Astronomy Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fastronomy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f30313%2fwhy-didnt-the-event-horizon-telescope-team-mention-sagittarius-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Reverse int within the 32-bit signed integer range: [−2^31, 2^31 − 1]Combining two 32-bit integers into one 64-bit integerDetermine if an int is within rangeLossy packing 32 bit integer to 16 bitComputing the square root of a 64-bit integerKeeping integer addition within boundsSafe multiplication of two 64-bit signed integersLeetcode 10: Regular Expression MatchingSigned integer-to-ascii x86_64 assembler macroReverse the digits of an Integer“Add two numbers given in reverse order from a linked list”

                              Category:Fedor von Bock Media in category "Fedor von Bock"Navigation menuUpload mediaISNI: 0000 0000 5511 3417VIAF ID: 24712551GND ID: 119294796Library of Congress authority ID: n96068363BnF ID: 12534305fSUDOC authorities ID: 034604189Open Library ID: OL338253ANKCR AUT ID: jn19990000869National Library of Israel ID: 000514068National Thesaurus for Author Names ID: 341574317ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

                              Kiel Indholdsfortegnelse Historie | Transport og færgeforbindelser | Sejlsport og anden sport | Kultur | Kendte personer fra Kiel | Noter | Litteratur | Eksterne henvisninger | Navigationsmenuwww.kiel.de54°19′31″N 10°8′26″Ø / 54.32528°N 10.14056°Ø / 54.32528; 10.14056Oberbürgermeister Dr. Ulf Kämpferwww.statistik-nord.deDen danske Stats StatistikKiels hjemmesiderrrWorldCat312794080n790547494030481-4