C++ check if statement can be evaluated constexprWhat are the differences between a pointer variable and a reference variable in C++?Is it possible to write a template to check for a function's existence?How can I profile C++ code running on Linux?The Definitive C++ Book Guide and ListWhy can templates only be implemented in the header file?What is the effect of extern “C” in C++?What is the “-->” operator in C++?Easiest way to convert int to string in C++Why is reading lines from stdin much slower in C++ than Python?Difference between `constexpr` and `const`

What features enable the Su-25 Frogfoot to operate with such a wide variety of fuels?

How to get directions in deep space?

Has the laser at Magurele, Romania reached a tenth of the Sun's power?

How could a planet have erratic days?

Microchip documentation does not label CAN buss pins on micro controller pinout diagram

Is there any evidence that Cleopatra and Caesarion considered fleeing to India to escape the Romans?

Do we have to expect a queue for the shuttle from Watford Junction to Harry Potter Studio?

Review your own paper in Mathematics

Change the color of a single dot in `ddot` symbol

What are some good ways to treat frozen vegetables such that they behave like fresh vegetables when stir frying them?

Can a stoichiometric mixture of oxygen and methane exist as a liquid at standard pressure and some (low) temperature?

What fields between the rationals and the reals allow a good notion of 2D distance?

Why is so much work done on numerical verification of the Riemann Hypothesis?

Why does the Sun have different day lengths, but not the gas giants?

Is this toilet slogan correct usage of the English language?

How would you translate "more" for use as an interface button?

Why do ¬, ∀ and ∃ have the same precedence?

Multiplicative persistence

Does an advisor owe his/her student anything? Will an advisor keep a PhD student only out of pity?

Showing a sum is positive

Pre-mixing cryogenic fuels and using only one fuel tank

Why does Carol not get rid of the Kree symbol on her suit when she changes its colours?

A Trivial Diagnosis

Can I cause damage to electrical appliances by unplugging them when they are turned on?



C++ check if statement can be evaluated constexpr


What are the differences between a pointer variable and a reference variable in C++?Is it possible to write a template to check for a function's existence?How can I profile C++ code running on Linux?The Definitive C++ Book Guide and ListWhy can templates only be implemented in the header file?What is the effect of extern “C” in C++?What is the “-->” operator in C++?Easiest way to convert int to string in C++Why is reading lines from stdin much slower in C++ than Python?Difference between `constexpr` and `const`













10















Is there a method to decide whether something can be constexpr evaluated, and use the result as a constexpr boolean? My simplified use case is as follows:



template <typename base>
class derived

template<size_t size>
void do_stuff() (...)

void do_stuff(size_t size) (...)
public:
void execute()

if constexpr(is_constexpr(base::get_data())

do_stuff<base::get_data()>();

else

do_stuff(base::get_data());





My target is C++2a.



I found the following reddit thread, but I'm not a big fan of the macros. https://www.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/7c208c/is_constexpr_a_macro_that_check_if_an_expression/










share|improve this question
























  • Hmm, the body of a if constexpr will only be evaluated if the expression in the if constexpr is true at compile time. Is that what you are looking for?

    – Jesper Juhl
    10 hours ago











  • But what if the test in the if constexpr([test]) is not evaluatable at compile time?

    – Aart Stuurman
    10 hours ago






  • 4





    Maybe you can do something with std::is_constant_evaluated?

    – 0x5453
    10 hours ago











  • en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/if

    – Jesper Juhl
    10 hours ago






  • 1





    @AartStuurman: What is do_stuff that it can run at compile time or runtime, but itself should not be constexpr? Wouldn't it make more sense to just make it a constexpr function, and pass it the value of get_data as a parameter?

    – Nicol Bolas
    10 hours ago















10















Is there a method to decide whether something can be constexpr evaluated, and use the result as a constexpr boolean? My simplified use case is as follows:



template <typename base>
class derived

template<size_t size>
void do_stuff() (...)

void do_stuff(size_t size) (...)
public:
void execute()

if constexpr(is_constexpr(base::get_data())

do_stuff<base::get_data()>();

else

do_stuff(base::get_data());





My target is C++2a.



I found the following reddit thread, but I'm not a big fan of the macros. https://www.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/7c208c/is_constexpr_a_macro_that_check_if_an_expression/










share|improve this question
























  • Hmm, the body of a if constexpr will only be evaluated if the expression in the if constexpr is true at compile time. Is that what you are looking for?

    – Jesper Juhl
    10 hours ago











  • But what if the test in the if constexpr([test]) is not evaluatable at compile time?

    – Aart Stuurman
    10 hours ago






  • 4





    Maybe you can do something with std::is_constant_evaluated?

    – 0x5453
    10 hours ago











  • en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/if

    – Jesper Juhl
    10 hours ago






  • 1





    @AartStuurman: What is do_stuff that it can run at compile time or runtime, but itself should not be constexpr? Wouldn't it make more sense to just make it a constexpr function, and pass it the value of get_data as a parameter?

    – Nicol Bolas
    10 hours ago













10












10








10


4






Is there a method to decide whether something can be constexpr evaluated, and use the result as a constexpr boolean? My simplified use case is as follows:



template <typename base>
class derived

template<size_t size>
void do_stuff() (...)

void do_stuff(size_t size) (...)
public:
void execute()

if constexpr(is_constexpr(base::get_data())

do_stuff<base::get_data()>();

else

do_stuff(base::get_data());





My target is C++2a.



I found the following reddit thread, but I'm not a big fan of the macros. https://www.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/7c208c/is_constexpr_a_macro_that_check_if_an_expression/










share|improve this question
















Is there a method to decide whether something can be constexpr evaluated, and use the result as a constexpr boolean? My simplified use case is as follows:



template <typename base>
class derived

template<size_t size>
void do_stuff() (...)

void do_stuff(size_t size) (...)
public:
void execute()

if constexpr(is_constexpr(base::get_data())

do_stuff<base::get_data()>();

else

do_stuff(base::get_data());





My target is C++2a.



I found the following reddit thread, but I'm not a big fan of the macros. https://www.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/7c208c/is_constexpr_a_macro_that_check_if_an_expression/







c++ templates template-meta-programming constexpr c++20






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 9 hours ago









max66

38.1k74471




38.1k74471










asked 10 hours ago









Aart StuurmanAart Stuurman

930727




930727












  • Hmm, the body of a if constexpr will only be evaluated if the expression in the if constexpr is true at compile time. Is that what you are looking for?

    – Jesper Juhl
    10 hours ago











  • But what if the test in the if constexpr([test]) is not evaluatable at compile time?

    – Aart Stuurman
    10 hours ago






  • 4





    Maybe you can do something with std::is_constant_evaluated?

    – 0x5453
    10 hours ago











  • en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/if

    – Jesper Juhl
    10 hours ago






  • 1





    @AartStuurman: What is do_stuff that it can run at compile time or runtime, but itself should not be constexpr? Wouldn't it make more sense to just make it a constexpr function, and pass it the value of get_data as a parameter?

    – Nicol Bolas
    10 hours ago

















  • Hmm, the body of a if constexpr will only be evaluated if the expression in the if constexpr is true at compile time. Is that what you are looking for?

    – Jesper Juhl
    10 hours ago











  • But what if the test in the if constexpr([test]) is not evaluatable at compile time?

    – Aart Stuurman
    10 hours ago






  • 4





    Maybe you can do something with std::is_constant_evaluated?

    – 0x5453
    10 hours ago











  • en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/if

    – Jesper Juhl
    10 hours ago






  • 1





    @AartStuurman: What is do_stuff that it can run at compile time or runtime, but itself should not be constexpr? Wouldn't it make more sense to just make it a constexpr function, and pass it the value of get_data as a parameter?

    – Nicol Bolas
    10 hours ago
















Hmm, the body of a if constexpr will only be evaluated if the expression in the if constexpr is true at compile time. Is that what you are looking for?

– Jesper Juhl
10 hours ago





Hmm, the body of a if constexpr will only be evaluated if the expression in the if constexpr is true at compile time. Is that what you are looking for?

– Jesper Juhl
10 hours ago













But what if the test in the if constexpr([test]) is not evaluatable at compile time?

– Aart Stuurman
10 hours ago





But what if the test in the if constexpr([test]) is not evaluatable at compile time?

– Aart Stuurman
10 hours ago




4




4





Maybe you can do something with std::is_constant_evaluated?

– 0x5453
10 hours ago





Maybe you can do something with std::is_constant_evaluated?

– 0x5453
10 hours ago













en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/if

– Jesper Juhl
10 hours ago





en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/if

– Jesper Juhl
10 hours ago




1




1





@AartStuurman: What is do_stuff that it can run at compile time or runtime, but itself should not be constexpr? Wouldn't it make more sense to just make it a constexpr function, and pass it the value of get_data as a parameter?

– Nicol Bolas
10 hours ago





@AartStuurman: What is do_stuff that it can run at compile time or runtime, but itself should not be constexpr? Wouldn't it make more sense to just make it a constexpr function, and pass it the value of get_data as a parameter?

– Nicol Bolas
10 hours ago












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















8














Not exactly what you asked (I've developer a custom type trait specific for a get_value() static method... maybe it's possible to generalize it but, at the moment, I don't know how) but I suppose you can use SFINAE and make something as follows



#include <iostream>
#include <type_traits>

template <typename T>
constexpr auto icee_helper (int)
-> decltype( std::integral_constant<decltype(T::get_data()), T::get_data()>,
std::true_type );

template <typename>
constexpr auto icee_helper (long)
-> std::false_type;

template <typename T>
using isConstExprEval = decltype(icee_helper<T>(0));

template <typename base>
struct derived

template <std::size_t I>
void do_stuff()
std::cout << "constexpr case (" << I << ')' << std::endl;

void do_stuff (std::size_t i)
std::cout << "not constexpr case (" << i << ')' << std::endl;

void execute ()

if constexpr ( isConstExprEval<base>::value )
do_stuff<base::get_data()>();
else
do_stuff(base::get_data());

;

struct foo
static constexpr std::size_t get_data () return 1u; ;

struct bar
static std::size_t get_data () return 2u; ;

int main ()

derived<foo>.execute(); // print "constexpr case (1)"
derived<bar>.execute(); // print "not constexpr case (2)"






share|improve this answer




















  • 2





    This is madness, this use of the comma operator, the long/int overload... Have an upvote. :/

    – matovitch
    9 hours ago











  • @matovitch - never underestimate the power of the comma operator }:‑)

    – max66
    9 hours ago











  • Will this work on platforms where sizeof(long) is equal to sizeof(int)?

    – Gregory Nisbet
    3 hours ago


















5














Here's another solution, which is more generic (applicable to any expression, without defining a separate template each time).



This solution leverages that (1) lambda expressions can be constexpr as of C++17 (2) the type of a captureless lambda is default constructible as of C++20.



The idea is, the overload that returns true is selected when and only when Lambda() can appear within a template argument, which effectively requires the lambda invocation to be a constant expression.



template<class Lambda, int=(Lambda(), 0)>
constexpr bool is_constexpr(Lambda) return true;
constexpr bool is_constexpr(...) return false;

template <typename base>
class derived

// ...

void execute()

if constexpr(is_constexpr([] base::get_data(); ))
do_stuff<base::get_data()>();
else
do_stuff(base::get_data());







share|improve this answer

























  • Intriguing solution... this way you get the same result of my custom type traits but more synthetically and, above all, the exact expression verified (base::get_data()) is embedded in the argument and not hard-coded as in my solution. Very nice. I have to remember it.

    – max66
    6 hours ago



















2














template<auto> struct require_constant;
template<class T>
concept has_constexpr_data = requires typename require_constant<T::get_data()>; ;


This is basically what's used by std::ranges::split_view.






share|improve this answer






















    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    );
    );
    , "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55288555%2fc-check-if-statement-can-be-evaluated-constexpr%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    8














    Not exactly what you asked (I've developer a custom type trait specific for a get_value() static method... maybe it's possible to generalize it but, at the moment, I don't know how) but I suppose you can use SFINAE and make something as follows



    #include <iostream>
    #include <type_traits>

    template <typename T>
    constexpr auto icee_helper (int)
    -> decltype( std::integral_constant<decltype(T::get_data()), T::get_data()>,
    std::true_type );

    template <typename>
    constexpr auto icee_helper (long)
    -> std::false_type;

    template <typename T>
    using isConstExprEval = decltype(icee_helper<T>(0));

    template <typename base>
    struct derived

    template <std::size_t I>
    void do_stuff()
    std::cout << "constexpr case (" << I << ')' << std::endl;

    void do_stuff (std::size_t i)
    std::cout << "not constexpr case (" << i << ')' << std::endl;

    void execute ()

    if constexpr ( isConstExprEval<base>::value )
    do_stuff<base::get_data()>();
    else
    do_stuff(base::get_data());

    ;

    struct foo
    static constexpr std::size_t get_data () return 1u; ;

    struct bar
    static std::size_t get_data () return 2u; ;

    int main ()

    derived<foo>.execute(); // print "constexpr case (1)"
    derived<bar>.execute(); // print "not constexpr case (2)"






    share|improve this answer




















    • 2





      This is madness, this use of the comma operator, the long/int overload... Have an upvote. :/

      – matovitch
      9 hours ago











    • @matovitch - never underestimate the power of the comma operator }:‑)

      – max66
      9 hours ago











    • Will this work on platforms where sizeof(long) is equal to sizeof(int)?

      – Gregory Nisbet
      3 hours ago















    8














    Not exactly what you asked (I've developer a custom type trait specific for a get_value() static method... maybe it's possible to generalize it but, at the moment, I don't know how) but I suppose you can use SFINAE and make something as follows



    #include <iostream>
    #include <type_traits>

    template <typename T>
    constexpr auto icee_helper (int)
    -> decltype( std::integral_constant<decltype(T::get_data()), T::get_data()>,
    std::true_type );

    template <typename>
    constexpr auto icee_helper (long)
    -> std::false_type;

    template <typename T>
    using isConstExprEval = decltype(icee_helper<T>(0));

    template <typename base>
    struct derived

    template <std::size_t I>
    void do_stuff()
    std::cout << "constexpr case (" << I << ')' << std::endl;

    void do_stuff (std::size_t i)
    std::cout << "not constexpr case (" << i << ')' << std::endl;

    void execute ()

    if constexpr ( isConstExprEval<base>::value )
    do_stuff<base::get_data()>();
    else
    do_stuff(base::get_data());

    ;

    struct foo
    static constexpr std::size_t get_data () return 1u; ;

    struct bar
    static std::size_t get_data () return 2u; ;

    int main ()

    derived<foo>.execute(); // print "constexpr case (1)"
    derived<bar>.execute(); // print "not constexpr case (2)"






    share|improve this answer




















    • 2





      This is madness, this use of the comma operator, the long/int overload... Have an upvote. :/

      – matovitch
      9 hours ago











    • @matovitch - never underestimate the power of the comma operator }:‑)

      – max66
      9 hours ago











    • Will this work on platforms where sizeof(long) is equal to sizeof(int)?

      – Gregory Nisbet
      3 hours ago













    8












    8








    8







    Not exactly what you asked (I've developer a custom type trait specific for a get_value() static method... maybe it's possible to generalize it but, at the moment, I don't know how) but I suppose you can use SFINAE and make something as follows



    #include <iostream>
    #include <type_traits>

    template <typename T>
    constexpr auto icee_helper (int)
    -> decltype( std::integral_constant<decltype(T::get_data()), T::get_data()>,
    std::true_type );

    template <typename>
    constexpr auto icee_helper (long)
    -> std::false_type;

    template <typename T>
    using isConstExprEval = decltype(icee_helper<T>(0));

    template <typename base>
    struct derived

    template <std::size_t I>
    void do_stuff()
    std::cout << "constexpr case (" << I << ')' << std::endl;

    void do_stuff (std::size_t i)
    std::cout << "not constexpr case (" << i << ')' << std::endl;

    void execute ()

    if constexpr ( isConstExprEval<base>::value )
    do_stuff<base::get_data()>();
    else
    do_stuff(base::get_data());

    ;

    struct foo
    static constexpr std::size_t get_data () return 1u; ;

    struct bar
    static std::size_t get_data () return 2u; ;

    int main ()

    derived<foo>.execute(); // print "constexpr case (1)"
    derived<bar>.execute(); // print "not constexpr case (2)"






    share|improve this answer















    Not exactly what you asked (I've developer a custom type trait specific for a get_value() static method... maybe it's possible to generalize it but, at the moment, I don't know how) but I suppose you can use SFINAE and make something as follows



    #include <iostream>
    #include <type_traits>

    template <typename T>
    constexpr auto icee_helper (int)
    -> decltype( std::integral_constant<decltype(T::get_data()), T::get_data()>,
    std::true_type );

    template <typename>
    constexpr auto icee_helper (long)
    -> std::false_type;

    template <typename T>
    using isConstExprEval = decltype(icee_helper<T>(0));

    template <typename base>
    struct derived

    template <std::size_t I>
    void do_stuff()
    std::cout << "constexpr case (" << I << ')' << std::endl;

    void do_stuff (std::size_t i)
    std::cout << "not constexpr case (" << i << ')' << std::endl;

    void execute ()

    if constexpr ( isConstExprEval<base>::value )
    do_stuff<base::get_data()>();
    else
    do_stuff(base::get_data());

    ;

    struct foo
    static constexpr std::size_t get_data () return 1u; ;

    struct bar
    static std::size_t get_data () return 2u; ;

    int main ()

    derived<foo>.execute(); // print "constexpr case (1)"
    derived<bar>.execute(); // print "not constexpr case (2)"







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 9 hours ago

























    answered 9 hours ago









    max66max66

    38.1k74471




    38.1k74471







    • 2





      This is madness, this use of the comma operator, the long/int overload... Have an upvote. :/

      – matovitch
      9 hours ago











    • @matovitch - never underestimate the power of the comma operator }:‑)

      – max66
      9 hours ago











    • Will this work on platforms where sizeof(long) is equal to sizeof(int)?

      – Gregory Nisbet
      3 hours ago












    • 2





      This is madness, this use of the comma operator, the long/int overload... Have an upvote. :/

      – matovitch
      9 hours ago











    • @matovitch - never underestimate the power of the comma operator }:‑)

      – max66
      9 hours ago











    • Will this work on platforms where sizeof(long) is equal to sizeof(int)?

      – Gregory Nisbet
      3 hours ago







    2




    2





    This is madness, this use of the comma operator, the long/int overload... Have an upvote. :/

    – matovitch
    9 hours ago





    This is madness, this use of the comma operator, the long/int overload... Have an upvote. :/

    – matovitch
    9 hours ago













    @matovitch - never underestimate the power of the comma operator }:‑)

    – max66
    9 hours ago





    @matovitch - never underestimate the power of the comma operator }:‑)

    – max66
    9 hours ago













    Will this work on platforms where sizeof(long) is equal to sizeof(int)?

    – Gregory Nisbet
    3 hours ago





    Will this work on platforms where sizeof(long) is equal to sizeof(int)?

    – Gregory Nisbet
    3 hours ago













    5














    Here's another solution, which is more generic (applicable to any expression, without defining a separate template each time).



    This solution leverages that (1) lambda expressions can be constexpr as of C++17 (2) the type of a captureless lambda is default constructible as of C++20.



    The idea is, the overload that returns true is selected when and only when Lambda() can appear within a template argument, which effectively requires the lambda invocation to be a constant expression.



    template<class Lambda, int=(Lambda(), 0)>
    constexpr bool is_constexpr(Lambda) return true;
    constexpr bool is_constexpr(...) return false;

    template <typename base>
    class derived

    // ...

    void execute()

    if constexpr(is_constexpr([] base::get_data(); ))
    do_stuff<base::get_data()>();
    else
    do_stuff(base::get_data());







    share|improve this answer

























    • Intriguing solution... this way you get the same result of my custom type traits but more synthetically and, above all, the exact expression verified (base::get_data()) is embedded in the argument and not hard-coded as in my solution. Very nice. I have to remember it.

      – max66
      6 hours ago
















    5














    Here's another solution, which is more generic (applicable to any expression, without defining a separate template each time).



    This solution leverages that (1) lambda expressions can be constexpr as of C++17 (2) the type of a captureless lambda is default constructible as of C++20.



    The idea is, the overload that returns true is selected when and only when Lambda() can appear within a template argument, which effectively requires the lambda invocation to be a constant expression.



    template<class Lambda, int=(Lambda(), 0)>
    constexpr bool is_constexpr(Lambda) return true;
    constexpr bool is_constexpr(...) return false;

    template <typename base>
    class derived

    // ...

    void execute()

    if constexpr(is_constexpr([] base::get_data(); ))
    do_stuff<base::get_data()>();
    else
    do_stuff(base::get_data());







    share|improve this answer

























    • Intriguing solution... this way you get the same result of my custom type traits but more synthetically and, above all, the exact expression verified (base::get_data()) is embedded in the argument and not hard-coded as in my solution. Very nice. I have to remember it.

      – max66
      6 hours ago














    5












    5








    5







    Here's another solution, which is more generic (applicable to any expression, without defining a separate template each time).



    This solution leverages that (1) lambda expressions can be constexpr as of C++17 (2) the type of a captureless lambda is default constructible as of C++20.



    The idea is, the overload that returns true is selected when and only when Lambda() can appear within a template argument, which effectively requires the lambda invocation to be a constant expression.



    template<class Lambda, int=(Lambda(), 0)>
    constexpr bool is_constexpr(Lambda) return true;
    constexpr bool is_constexpr(...) return false;

    template <typename base>
    class derived

    // ...

    void execute()

    if constexpr(is_constexpr([] base::get_data(); ))
    do_stuff<base::get_data()>();
    else
    do_stuff(base::get_data());







    share|improve this answer















    Here's another solution, which is more generic (applicable to any expression, without defining a separate template each time).



    This solution leverages that (1) lambda expressions can be constexpr as of C++17 (2) the type of a captureless lambda is default constructible as of C++20.



    The idea is, the overload that returns true is selected when and only when Lambda() can appear within a template argument, which effectively requires the lambda invocation to be a constant expression.



    template<class Lambda, int=(Lambda(), 0)>
    constexpr bool is_constexpr(Lambda) return true;
    constexpr bool is_constexpr(...) return false;

    template <typename base>
    class derived

    // ...

    void execute()

    if constexpr(is_constexpr([] base::get_data(); ))
    do_stuff<base::get_data()>();
    else
    do_stuff(base::get_data());








    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 7 hours ago

























    answered 7 hours ago









    cpplearnercpplearner

    5,40722341




    5,40722341












    • Intriguing solution... this way you get the same result of my custom type traits but more synthetically and, above all, the exact expression verified (base::get_data()) is embedded in the argument and not hard-coded as in my solution. Very nice. I have to remember it.

      – max66
      6 hours ago


















    • Intriguing solution... this way you get the same result of my custom type traits but more synthetically and, above all, the exact expression verified (base::get_data()) is embedded in the argument and not hard-coded as in my solution. Very nice. I have to remember it.

      – max66
      6 hours ago

















    Intriguing solution... this way you get the same result of my custom type traits but more synthetically and, above all, the exact expression verified (base::get_data()) is embedded in the argument and not hard-coded as in my solution. Very nice. I have to remember it.

    – max66
    6 hours ago






    Intriguing solution... this way you get the same result of my custom type traits but more synthetically and, above all, the exact expression verified (base::get_data()) is embedded in the argument and not hard-coded as in my solution. Very nice. I have to remember it.

    – max66
    6 hours ago












    2














    template<auto> struct require_constant;
    template<class T>
    concept has_constexpr_data = requires typename require_constant<T::get_data()>; ;


    This is basically what's used by std::ranges::split_view.






    share|improve this answer



























      2














      template<auto> struct require_constant;
      template<class T>
      concept has_constexpr_data = requires typename require_constant<T::get_data()>; ;


      This is basically what's used by std::ranges::split_view.






      share|improve this answer

























        2












        2








        2







        template<auto> struct require_constant;
        template<class T>
        concept has_constexpr_data = requires typename require_constant<T::get_data()>; ;


        This is basically what's used by std::ranges::split_view.






        share|improve this answer













        template<auto> struct require_constant;
        template<class T>
        concept has_constexpr_data = requires typename require_constant<T::get_data()>; ;


        This is basically what's used by std::ranges::split_view.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 8 hours ago









        cpplearnercpplearner

        5,40722341




        5,40722341



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55288555%2fc-check-if-statement-can-be-evaluated-constexpr%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Reverse int within the 32-bit signed integer range: [−2^31, 2^31 − 1]Combining two 32-bit integers into one 64-bit integerDetermine if an int is within rangeLossy packing 32 bit integer to 16 bitComputing the square root of a 64-bit integerKeeping integer addition within boundsSafe multiplication of two 64-bit signed integersLeetcode 10: Regular Expression MatchingSigned integer-to-ascii x86_64 assembler macroReverse the digits of an Integer“Add two numbers given in reverse order from a linked list”

            Category:Fedor von Bock Media in category "Fedor von Bock"Navigation menuUpload mediaISNI: 0000 0000 5511 3417VIAF ID: 24712551GND ID: 119294796Library of Congress authority ID: n96068363BnF ID: 12534305fSUDOC authorities ID: 034604189Open Library ID: OL338253ANKCR AUT ID: jn19990000869National Library of Israel ID: 000514068National Thesaurus for Author Names ID: 341574317ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

            Kiel Indholdsfortegnelse Historie | Transport og færgeforbindelser | Sejlsport og anden sport | Kultur | Kendte personer fra Kiel | Noter | Litteratur | Eksterne henvisninger | Navigationsmenuwww.kiel.de54°19′31″N 10°8′26″Ø / 54.32528°N 10.14056°Ø / 54.32528; 10.14056Oberbürgermeister Dr. Ulf Kämpferwww.statistik-nord.deDen danske Stats StatistikKiels hjemmesiderrrWorldCat312794080n790547494030481-4