Rrerku

My first visit to TeX.SX came when I was looking for a symbol for a twisted product:

I knew about Detexify and the Comprehensive LaTeX Symbol List, but I could not find the symbol there. I tried the construction that was obvious to me, namely oversetscriptstyle simtimes, but the sim was much too high. I Googled, and found this solution by @Hendrik Vogt. Thus I learned about smash.

Later I needed the same symbol in a subscript, ultimately learning about mathchoice and ooalign. Since then I have found that many questions on TeX.SX needed similar techniques. I though it would be a good idea to have a single question whose answers gave visitors with modest LaTeX skills general guidelines on constructing new symbols using LaTeX and related systems.

So, how do you make your own symbol when Detexify fails?

If it's really not in Detexify, check the Comprehensive LaTeX Symbol List to see if your symbol can be found in an existing package. Note, The Comprehensive List is long! Over 300 pages. But it is searchable, well-organized, and has a good table of contents and index.

If that doesn't help, it may be time to design your own symbol. It's probably best to give your new symbol a name so it can be used repeatedly and transported more easily into another document.

If your symbol will be used as an operator with limits (like an integral or summation), you should use the DeclareMathOperator or DeclareMathOperator* command. Both of these use the amsmath package. The unstarred version places sub- and superscript limits to the right of the operator; the starred version places limits above and below the operator when it is in displaystyle. To illustrate:

DeclareMathOperator*squareopsquare
DeclareMathOperatortriangleopbigtriangleup

[Note that square uses the amssymb package.]

Then the code

[
squareop_n=1^infty a_n qquad triangleop_n=1^infty a_n
]

will produce the following output:

More information on DeclareMathOperator can be found in this answer by @Andrew Swann.

If your symbol is not going to be used in that fashion, you should probably use newcommand.

If your symbol is a math symbol: Is it a binary operator (such as + or times)? A binary relation (such as < or leq)? Or an ordinary math symbol (such as ! or infty)? The spacing is different for each case. Compare the three versions for the symbol times:

newcommandreltimesmathreltimes
newcommandbintimesmathbintimes
newcommandchrtimestimes

Then noindent $areltimes b newline abintimes b newline achrtimes b$ will produce the output:

Note the extra set of curly braces in chrtimes. If you remove them you'll get the same output as mathbintimes, since times is by default a binary operator. You can enclose most math symbols in to turn them into ordinary math symbols.

Typically, binary relations have slightly more space than binary operators, and significantly more than ordinary symbols. However, the spacing changes when these appear as sub- or superscripts. All three examples above will look like A_atimes b if placed in a subscript.

Many new symbols can be created by modifying or combining existing symbols. To rotate, scale or reflect existing symbols, use the graphicx or graphics package. Documentation is here. The commands are rotatebox, scalebox, resizebox and reflectbox.

For example, if you want a cong symbol (≅), but with the tilde reversed, the reflectbox command from graphicx can be used. The code

newcommandbackcongmathrelreflectbox$cong$

will produce the desired effect with the code $Abackcong B$.

If you try using this code in a subscript (for example, $X_Abackcong B$), the new symbol will not scale down as it should. This is resolved below below using mathchoice.

To combine multiple symbols (math or text) the ooalign command can be used. @egreg has a detailed explanation here. The basic idea is that ooalign creates a one-column table, with all rows superimposed on one another, and no padding outside the column. Each row of the "table" ends with cr. Entries can be centered in the column using hfil.

For example, to produce

we superimpose a circ symbol with a text T character. The command

newcommandTcircmathbin%
 ooalignhfil$circ$hfilcrhfil Thfilcr%
 

together with $ATcirc B$ produces the output.

To make sure your symbol looks right whether it's displayed, inline, script or scriptscript, you can use mathchoice. (Note mathpalette (explained here by @egreg and @Werner) can be used when the four versions are identical except for style.)

mathchoice
 <do this if called in displaystyle>
 <do this if called in textstyle>
 <do this if called in scriptstyle>
 <do this if called in scriptscriptstyle>

The above code will produce the corresponding output for each of the four math styles.

To illustrate, here is a solution to the twisted product question that will adjust to scripts and scriptscripts.

newcommandtwprodmathbinmathchoice%
 ooalignhfilraisebox1.15exmbox$scriptstylesim$hfilcrhfil$times$hfilcr%
 ooalignhfilraisebox1.15exmbox$scriptstylesim$hfilcrhfil$times$hfilcr%
 ooalignhfilraisebox.85exmbox$scriptscriptstylesim$hfilcrhfil$scriptstyletimes$hfilcr%
 ooalignhfilraisebox.65exscalebox.8$scriptscriptstylesim$hfilcrhfil$scriptscriptstyletimes$hfilcr% 

S^2twprod S^2 quad F_S^2twprod S^2 quad F_K_S^2twprod S^2

I downsized the sim in each style so it fit better over the times.

Similar effects can be obtained using stackengine. Documentation is here.

If you can't create your symbol by combining or modifying others, you can design your symbol from scratch using tikz, together with the ideas above. Here is an example by @marmot.

Another possibility with the stackinset command, from stackengine:

documentclass[border = 2pt]standalone

 usepackagestackengine, graphicx %

newcommandsimtimesstackMathmathbinmathchoice%
stackinsetc0exc0.9exscalebox 0.67$sim $times%
stackinsetc0exc0.9exscalebox 0.67$sim $times%
stackinsetc0exc0.7exscalebox 0.67$scriptstylesim $scriptstyletimes%
stackinsetc0exc0.6exscalebox 0.67$scriptscriptstylesim $scriptscriptstyletimes%


begindocument

 $ S^2 simtimes S^2 quad F_S^2 simtimes S^2 quad F_K_S^2 simtimes S^2$

enddocument 

I'd like to expand a bit on the "build the symbol from scratch" part. There are some very simple basic principles that help making the symbol scalable:

• Use relative length scales for all dimensions. These are explained very nicely in this answer. The most important feature (for the purposes here) is that they scale with the font size.


• Use relative length scales for the line widths.


• Consider using the baseline option.

An example is given in this post:

documentclassarticle
usepackagetikz
newcommandinftrianbegintikzpicture[baseline=-0.25em]
draw[line width=0.075em] (-45:0.5em) -- (105:0.5em) (-15:0.5em) -- (-165:0.5em) (-135:0.5em) -- (75:0.5em);
endtikzpicture
begindocument
ABC inftrian DEF
enddocument

You can combine this with all that has been said in Sandy G's nice answer about mathchoice. The thing I like about TikZ, though, is that it is IMHO particularly intuitive to design the symbol since it offers polar and Cartesian coordinates, and works with all common compilers (latex, pdflatex, xelatex and lualatex, and even tex, though the syntax is slightly different). A potential drawback of the simple example above is that it does not detect the font weight and so on. I do not know if this has been discussed somewhere, nor do I know if there is a foolproof way of finding out the current font weight and so on. On the other hand, in many situations one may not need these features.