JIS and ISO square taperWhat road double cranksets will work with a 108mm JIS square taper bottom bracket spindle?Are these compatible bottom brackets?What went wrong with my bottom bracket spindle length calculation?What are the different types of bottom brackets?Help me understand bottom brackets and cranksI can remove crank arms without a crank puller, is this a problem? I'm worried the crankarms might be looseOrienting Shimano Cup and Cone square-taper bottom bracket spindlecranks for a JIS bottom bracketReplace old square taper bottom bracket / ISO or JIS?Ideal distance between chainring and chain stay

"It doesn't matter" or "it won't matter"?

What kind of floor tile is this?

Is there a way to have vectors outlined in a Vector Plot?

When were female captains banned from Starfleet?

What to do when eye contact makes your coworker uncomfortable?

Why is it that I can sometimes guess the next note?

Does Doodling or Improvising on the Piano Have Any Benefits?

Microchip documentation does not label CAN buss pins on micro controller pinout diagram

Review your own paper in Mathematics

Is this part of the description of the Archfey warlock's Misty Escape feature redundant?

Which Article Helped Get Rid of Technobabble in RPGs?

Is it allowed to activate the ability of multiple planeswalkers in a single turn?

How many arrows is an archer expected to fire by the end of the Tyranny of Dragons pair of adventures?

How can I write humor as character trait?

Does the Linux kernel need a file system to run?

Pre-mixing cryogenic fuels and using only one fuel tank

Taxes on Dividends in a Roth IRA

Does an advisor owe his/her student anything? Will an advisor keep a PhD student only out of pity?

How to explain what's wrong with this application of the chain rule?

What features enable the Su-25 Frogfoot to operate with such a wide variety of fuels?

What (the heck) is a Super Worm Equinox Moon?

What is Cash Advance APR?

What's the name of the logical fallacy where a debater extends a statement far beyond the original statement to make it true?

awk assign to multiple variables at once



JIS and ISO square taper


What road double cranksets will work with a 108mm JIS square taper bottom bracket spindle?Are these compatible bottom brackets?What went wrong with my bottom bracket spindle length calculation?What are the different types of bottom brackets?Help me understand bottom brackets and cranksI can remove crank arms without a crank puller, is this a problem? I'm worried the crankarms might be looseOrienting Shimano Cup and Cone square-taper bottom bracket spindlecranks for a JIS bottom bracketReplace old square taper bottom bracket / ISO or JIS?Ideal distance between chainring and chain stay













3















I've read Sheldon Brown's page on JIS and ISO and have read exchanges in forums about the pros and cons of using ISO cranks on JIS bottom brackets.



If my understanding is correct, these standards define the shape and dimensions of the BB spindle and thus have implications for the cut made in the crank that must fit on the spindle.



The reason for my question is that a vendor of ISO cranksets is telling me that their cranksets will work on an ISO or JIS bottom bracket if the bike is a folding bike. Does whether the bike folds have anything at all to do with this compatibility between BB and crank?










share|improve this question






















  • It does not make any sense at all. What is this vendor?

    – ojs
    11 hours ago











  • @ojs: It's not the manufacturer but an online seller, so I'd rather not give any particulars, but it's not one that is well-known.

    – Tᴚoɯɐuo
    9 hours ago






  • 2





    I don't see any particular reason why they should be protected from their own incompetence.

    – ojs
    8 hours ago











  • I'd prefer to inoculate the ignorant (like myself) against their incompetence.

    – Tᴚoɯɐuo
    6 hours ago















3















I've read Sheldon Brown's page on JIS and ISO and have read exchanges in forums about the pros and cons of using ISO cranks on JIS bottom brackets.



If my understanding is correct, these standards define the shape and dimensions of the BB spindle and thus have implications for the cut made in the crank that must fit on the spindle.



The reason for my question is that a vendor of ISO cranksets is telling me that their cranksets will work on an ISO or JIS bottom bracket if the bike is a folding bike. Does whether the bike folds have anything at all to do with this compatibility between BB and crank?










share|improve this question






















  • It does not make any sense at all. What is this vendor?

    – ojs
    11 hours ago











  • @ojs: It's not the manufacturer but an online seller, so I'd rather not give any particulars, but it's not one that is well-known.

    – Tᴚoɯɐuo
    9 hours ago






  • 2





    I don't see any particular reason why they should be protected from their own incompetence.

    – ojs
    8 hours ago











  • I'd prefer to inoculate the ignorant (like myself) against their incompetence.

    – Tᴚoɯɐuo
    6 hours ago













3












3








3








I've read Sheldon Brown's page on JIS and ISO and have read exchanges in forums about the pros and cons of using ISO cranks on JIS bottom brackets.



If my understanding is correct, these standards define the shape and dimensions of the BB spindle and thus have implications for the cut made in the crank that must fit on the spindle.



The reason for my question is that a vendor of ISO cranksets is telling me that their cranksets will work on an ISO or JIS bottom bracket if the bike is a folding bike. Does whether the bike folds have anything at all to do with this compatibility between BB and crank?










share|improve this question














I've read Sheldon Brown's page on JIS and ISO and have read exchanges in forums about the pros and cons of using ISO cranks on JIS bottom brackets.



If my understanding is correct, these standards define the shape and dimensions of the BB spindle and thus have implications for the cut made in the crank that must fit on the spindle.



The reason for my question is that a vendor of ISO cranksets is telling me that their cranksets will work on an ISO or JIS bottom bracket if the bike is a folding bike. Does whether the bike folds have anything at all to do with this compatibility between BB and crank?







crankset bottom-bracket folding-bicycle






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 12 hours ago









TᴚoɯɐuoTᴚoɯɐuo

1844




1844












  • It does not make any sense at all. What is this vendor?

    – ojs
    11 hours ago











  • @ojs: It's not the manufacturer but an online seller, so I'd rather not give any particulars, but it's not one that is well-known.

    – Tᴚoɯɐuo
    9 hours ago






  • 2





    I don't see any particular reason why they should be protected from their own incompetence.

    – ojs
    8 hours ago











  • I'd prefer to inoculate the ignorant (like myself) against their incompetence.

    – Tᴚoɯɐuo
    6 hours ago

















  • It does not make any sense at all. What is this vendor?

    – ojs
    11 hours ago











  • @ojs: It's not the manufacturer but an online seller, so I'd rather not give any particulars, but it's not one that is well-known.

    – Tᴚoɯɐuo
    9 hours ago






  • 2





    I don't see any particular reason why they should be protected from their own incompetence.

    – ojs
    8 hours ago











  • I'd prefer to inoculate the ignorant (like myself) against their incompetence.

    – Tᴚoɯɐuo
    6 hours ago
















It does not make any sense at all. What is this vendor?

– ojs
11 hours ago





It does not make any sense at all. What is this vendor?

– ojs
11 hours ago













@ojs: It's not the manufacturer but an online seller, so I'd rather not give any particulars, but it's not one that is well-known.

– Tᴚoɯɐuo
9 hours ago





@ojs: It's not the manufacturer but an online seller, so I'd rather not give any particulars, but it's not one that is well-known.

– Tᴚoɯɐuo
9 hours ago




2




2





I don't see any particular reason why they should be protected from their own incompetence.

– ojs
8 hours ago





I don't see any particular reason why they should be protected from their own incompetence.

– ojs
8 hours ago













I'd prefer to inoculate the ignorant (like myself) against their incompetence.

– Tᴚoɯɐuo
6 hours ago





I'd prefer to inoculate the ignorant (like myself) against their incompetence.

– Tᴚoɯɐuo
6 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4















Does whether the bike folds have anything at all to do with this compatibility between BB and crank?




Executive summary:



NO!



Longer answer:



Here's the Sheldon Brown link: https://www.sheldonbrown.com/bbtaper.html



Even though both ISO and JIS have the same taper angle, ISO spindles are narrower than JIS spindles, so an ISO crank won't go all the way onto a JIS spindle.



Depending on the specifics of the crankset and spindle, how far the cranks go onto the spindle may or may not be sufficient to both be safe and able to withstand usage for a good amount of time.



But I wouldn't do it for any bike I might ride - I view the situation you've described as a somewhat unethical attempt to make a sale. It might work, but saying it will just because the bike folds is, well, sleazy.



Because whether or not the bike folds doesn't matter. The specifics of the bottom bracket spindle and the crank itself matter. And a crank where the design prevents full engagement of the load-bearing surface with a close-but-not-quite-right bottom bracket spindle isn't a configuration I'd be able to recommend with a clean conscience.






share|improve this answer






















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "126"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbicycles.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f59880%2fjis-and-iso-square-taper%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4















    Does whether the bike folds have anything at all to do with this compatibility between BB and crank?




    Executive summary:



    NO!



    Longer answer:



    Here's the Sheldon Brown link: https://www.sheldonbrown.com/bbtaper.html



    Even though both ISO and JIS have the same taper angle, ISO spindles are narrower than JIS spindles, so an ISO crank won't go all the way onto a JIS spindle.



    Depending on the specifics of the crankset and spindle, how far the cranks go onto the spindle may or may not be sufficient to both be safe and able to withstand usage for a good amount of time.



    But I wouldn't do it for any bike I might ride - I view the situation you've described as a somewhat unethical attempt to make a sale. It might work, but saying it will just because the bike folds is, well, sleazy.



    Because whether or not the bike folds doesn't matter. The specifics of the bottom bracket spindle and the crank itself matter. And a crank where the design prevents full engagement of the load-bearing surface with a close-but-not-quite-right bottom bracket spindle isn't a configuration I'd be able to recommend with a clean conscience.






    share|improve this answer



























      4















      Does whether the bike folds have anything at all to do with this compatibility between BB and crank?




      Executive summary:



      NO!



      Longer answer:



      Here's the Sheldon Brown link: https://www.sheldonbrown.com/bbtaper.html



      Even though both ISO and JIS have the same taper angle, ISO spindles are narrower than JIS spindles, so an ISO crank won't go all the way onto a JIS spindle.



      Depending on the specifics of the crankset and spindle, how far the cranks go onto the spindle may or may not be sufficient to both be safe and able to withstand usage for a good amount of time.



      But I wouldn't do it for any bike I might ride - I view the situation you've described as a somewhat unethical attempt to make a sale. It might work, but saying it will just because the bike folds is, well, sleazy.



      Because whether or not the bike folds doesn't matter. The specifics of the bottom bracket spindle and the crank itself matter. And a crank where the design prevents full engagement of the load-bearing surface with a close-but-not-quite-right bottom bracket spindle isn't a configuration I'd be able to recommend with a clean conscience.






      share|improve this answer

























        4












        4








        4








        Does whether the bike folds have anything at all to do with this compatibility between BB and crank?




        Executive summary:



        NO!



        Longer answer:



        Here's the Sheldon Brown link: https://www.sheldonbrown.com/bbtaper.html



        Even though both ISO and JIS have the same taper angle, ISO spindles are narrower than JIS spindles, so an ISO crank won't go all the way onto a JIS spindle.



        Depending on the specifics of the crankset and spindle, how far the cranks go onto the spindle may or may not be sufficient to both be safe and able to withstand usage for a good amount of time.



        But I wouldn't do it for any bike I might ride - I view the situation you've described as a somewhat unethical attempt to make a sale. It might work, but saying it will just because the bike folds is, well, sleazy.



        Because whether or not the bike folds doesn't matter. The specifics of the bottom bracket spindle and the crank itself matter. And a crank where the design prevents full engagement of the load-bearing surface with a close-but-not-quite-right bottom bracket spindle isn't a configuration I'd be able to recommend with a clean conscience.






        share|improve this answer














        Does whether the bike folds have anything at all to do with this compatibility between BB and crank?




        Executive summary:



        NO!



        Longer answer:



        Here's the Sheldon Brown link: https://www.sheldonbrown.com/bbtaper.html



        Even though both ISO and JIS have the same taper angle, ISO spindles are narrower than JIS spindles, so an ISO crank won't go all the way onto a JIS spindle.



        Depending on the specifics of the crankset and spindle, how far the cranks go onto the spindle may or may not be sufficient to both be safe and able to withstand usage for a good amount of time.



        But I wouldn't do it for any bike I might ride - I view the situation you've described as a somewhat unethical attempt to make a sale. It might work, but saying it will just because the bike folds is, well, sleazy.



        Because whether or not the bike folds doesn't matter. The specifics of the bottom bracket spindle and the crank itself matter. And a crank where the design prevents full engagement of the load-bearing surface with a close-but-not-quite-right bottom bracket spindle isn't a configuration I'd be able to recommend with a clean conscience.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 11 hours ago









        Andrew HenleAndrew Henle

        2,428813




        2,428813



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Bicycles Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbicycles.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f59880%2fjis-and-iso-square-taper%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Reverse int within the 32-bit signed integer range: [−2^31, 2^31 − 1]Combining two 32-bit integers into one 64-bit integerDetermine if an int is within rangeLossy packing 32 bit integer to 16 bitComputing the square root of a 64-bit integerKeeping integer addition within boundsSafe multiplication of two 64-bit signed integersLeetcode 10: Regular Expression MatchingSigned integer-to-ascii x86_64 assembler macroReverse the digits of an Integer“Add two numbers given in reverse order from a linked list”

            Category:Fedor von Bock Media in category "Fedor von Bock"Navigation menuUpload mediaISNI: 0000 0000 5511 3417VIAF ID: 24712551GND ID: 119294796Library of Congress authority ID: n96068363BnF ID: 12534305fSUDOC authorities ID: 034604189Open Library ID: OL338253ANKCR AUT ID: jn19990000869National Library of Israel ID: 000514068National Thesaurus for Author Names ID: 341574317ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

            Kiel Indholdsfortegnelse Historie | Transport og færgeforbindelser | Sejlsport og anden sport | Kultur | Kendte personer fra Kiel | Noter | Litteratur | Eksterne henvisninger | Navigationsmenuwww.kiel.de54°19′31″N 10°8′26″Ø / 54.32528°N 10.14056°Ø / 54.32528; 10.14056Oberbürgermeister Dr. Ulf Kämpferwww.statistik-nord.deDen danske Stats StatistikKiels hjemmesiderrrWorldCat312794080n790547494030481-4