15% tax on $7.5k earnings. Is that right?If I pay taxes on my earnings, would someone also pay taxes on the same earnings if I subcontract them and pay a share?Graduate student stipend 1099-misc taxes seem to be coming out too high. Am I doing something wrong?UK self-employed freelancing in Japan. Who do I pay tax to on my earnings?UK Income tax relief for ISAs: How does the sheltering of earnings work?How does a tuition insurance payment affect 529 withdrawals?Does receiving a 1099-MISC require one to file a tax return even if he normally would not be required to file?Can earnings reported in boxes 3 or 7 on a 1099-misc be contributed toward an IRA?Managing Side Income from Online Earnings. Tax QuestionNon-resident alien taxHow to report 1099-MISC Box 7 bonus ($0 in box 3), but not an independent contractor and not self employed (payment from client of my employer)
Why is it that I can sometimes guess the next note?
Quoting Keynes in a lecture
When were female captains banned from Starfleet?
How much theory knowledge is actually used while playing?
How do you make your own symbol when Detexify fails?
Does grappling negate Mirror Image?
Make a Bowl of Alphabet Soup
15% tax on $7.5k earnings. Is that right?
Non-trope happy ending?
Is this toilet slogan correct usage of the English language?
How to explain what's wrong with this application of the chain rule?
Delete multiple columns using awk or sed
Has any country ever had 2 former presidents in jail simultaneously?
A variation to the phrase "hanging over my shoulders"
Are Captain Marvel's powers affected by Thanos breaking the Tesseract and claiming the stone?
What's the name of the logical fallacy where a debater extends a statement far beyond the original statement to make it true?
How do I tell my boss that I'm quitting soon, especially given that a colleague just left this week
Biological Blimps: Propulsion
Did the UK lift the requirement for registering SIM cards?
Permission on Database
Change the color of a single dot in `ddot` symbol
Find the next value of this number series
Why Shazam when there is already Superman?
Which Article Helped Get Rid of Technobabble in RPGs?
15% tax on $7.5k earnings. Is that right?
If I pay taxes on my earnings, would someone also pay taxes on the same earnings if I subcontract them and pay a share?Graduate student stipend 1099-misc taxes seem to be coming out too high. Am I doing something wrong?UK self-employed freelancing in Japan. Who do I pay tax to on my earnings?UK Income tax relief for ISAs: How does the sheltering of earnings work?How does a tuition insurance payment affect 529 withdrawals?Does receiving a 1099-MISC require one to file a tax return even if he normally would not be required to file?Can earnings reported in boxes 3 or 7 on a 1099-misc be contributed toward an IRA?Managing Side Income from Online Earnings. Tax QuestionNon-resident alien taxHow to report 1099-MISC Box 7 bonus ($0 in box 3), but not an independent contractor and not self employed (payment from client of my employer)
This year is my first year in the USA. My sole earnings were an honorarium from a university for $7,500 -- reported on a 1099-MISC form in box 7.
For this, I was on-site for a few days and talked about my particular technical expertise with university staff, and joined them in a publication.
However, as I have just been unpleasantly informed by turbotax, this does not make me a poor person earning under the $12k deductible. This makes me a self-employed business and thus I have to pay about 15% taxes on these earnings.
This seems completely crazy. Have I missed something?
united-states taxes self-employment
New contributor
A-Foreign-Scientist-2018 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
This year is my first year in the USA. My sole earnings were an honorarium from a university for $7,500 -- reported on a 1099-MISC form in box 7.
For this, I was on-site for a few days and talked about my particular technical expertise with university staff, and joined them in a publication.
However, as I have just been unpleasantly informed by turbotax, this does not make me a poor person earning under the $12k deductible. This makes me a self-employed business and thus I have to pay about 15% taxes on these earnings.
This seems completely crazy. Have I missed something?
united-states taxes self-employment
New contributor
A-Foreign-Scientist-2018 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
5
As your user name says "A Foreign Scientist", check your visa against this list. There is a paragraph that develops this statement "A NONRESIDENT ALIEN is not liable for the self-employment tax." irs.gov/individuals/international-taxpayers/…
– user662852
8 hours ago
Thanks -- I have an I-765 EAD and therefore I am a resident alien.
– A-Foreign-Scientist-2018
8 hours ago
8
You will need to verify whether you are a non-resident for tax purposes - this is different from immigration definition. If you are a NR for tax, you cannot use Turbotax, as it does not offer support for this - find software that support form 1040NR (non resident).
– Najel
7 hours ago
1
@Davislor - the urban legend is about income tax, not just any random duty on a gallon of gas.
– Davor
2 hours ago
add a comment |
This year is my first year in the USA. My sole earnings were an honorarium from a university for $7,500 -- reported on a 1099-MISC form in box 7.
For this, I was on-site for a few days and talked about my particular technical expertise with university staff, and joined them in a publication.
However, as I have just been unpleasantly informed by turbotax, this does not make me a poor person earning under the $12k deductible. This makes me a self-employed business and thus I have to pay about 15% taxes on these earnings.
This seems completely crazy. Have I missed something?
united-states taxes self-employment
New contributor
A-Foreign-Scientist-2018 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
This year is my first year in the USA. My sole earnings were an honorarium from a university for $7,500 -- reported on a 1099-MISC form in box 7.
For this, I was on-site for a few days and talked about my particular technical expertise with university staff, and joined them in a publication.
However, as I have just been unpleasantly informed by turbotax, this does not make me a poor person earning under the $12k deductible. This makes me a self-employed business and thus I have to pay about 15% taxes on these earnings.
This seems completely crazy. Have I missed something?
united-states taxes self-employment
united-states taxes self-employment
New contributor
A-Foreign-Scientist-2018 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
A-Foreign-Scientist-2018 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 6 hours ago
A-Foreign-Scientist-2018
New contributor
A-Foreign-Scientist-2018 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 9 hours ago
A-Foreign-Scientist-2018A-Foreign-Scientist-2018
6614
6614
New contributor
A-Foreign-Scientist-2018 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
A-Foreign-Scientist-2018 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
A-Foreign-Scientist-2018 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
5
As your user name says "A Foreign Scientist", check your visa against this list. There is a paragraph that develops this statement "A NONRESIDENT ALIEN is not liable for the self-employment tax." irs.gov/individuals/international-taxpayers/…
– user662852
8 hours ago
Thanks -- I have an I-765 EAD and therefore I am a resident alien.
– A-Foreign-Scientist-2018
8 hours ago
8
You will need to verify whether you are a non-resident for tax purposes - this is different from immigration definition. If you are a NR for tax, you cannot use Turbotax, as it does not offer support for this - find software that support form 1040NR (non resident).
– Najel
7 hours ago
1
@Davislor - the urban legend is about income tax, not just any random duty on a gallon of gas.
– Davor
2 hours ago
add a comment |
5
As your user name says "A Foreign Scientist", check your visa against this list. There is a paragraph that develops this statement "A NONRESIDENT ALIEN is not liable for the self-employment tax." irs.gov/individuals/international-taxpayers/…
– user662852
8 hours ago
Thanks -- I have an I-765 EAD and therefore I am a resident alien.
– A-Foreign-Scientist-2018
8 hours ago
8
You will need to verify whether you are a non-resident for tax purposes - this is different from immigration definition. If you are a NR for tax, you cannot use Turbotax, as it does not offer support for this - find software that support form 1040NR (non resident).
– Najel
7 hours ago
1
@Davislor - the urban legend is about income tax, not just any random duty on a gallon of gas.
– Davor
2 hours ago
5
5
As your user name says "A Foreign Scientist", check your visa against this list. There is a paragraph that develops this statement "A NONRESIDENT ALIEN is not liable for the self-employment tax." irs.gov/individuals/international-taxpayers/…
– user662852
8 hours ago
As your user name says "A Foreign Scientist", check your visa against this list. There is a paragraph that develops this statement "A NONRESIDENT ALIEN is not liable for the self-employment tax." irs.gov/individuals/international-taxpayers/…
– user662852
8 hours ago
Thanks -- I have an I-765 EAD and therefore I am a resident alien.
– A-Foreign-Scientist-2018
8 hours ago
Thanks -- I have an I-765 EAD and therefore I am a resident alien.
– A-Foreign-Scientist-2018
8 hours ago
8
8
You will need to verify whether you are a non-resident for tax purposes - this is different from immigration definition. If you are a NR for tax, you cannot use Turbotax, as it does not offer support for this - find software that support form 1040NR (non resident).
– Najel
7 hours ago
You will need to verify whether you are a non-resident for tax purposes - this is different from immigration definition. If you are a NR for tax, you cannot use Turbotax, as it does not offer support for this - find software that support form 1040NR (non resident).
– Najel
7 hours ago
1
1
@Davislor - the urban legend is about income tax, not just any random duty on a gallon of gas.
– Davor
2 hours ago
@Davislor - the urban legend is about income tax, not just any random duty on a gallon of gas.
– Davor
2 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
The 15% you're seeing is self-employment tax. The standard deduction still applies, and you are not paying any federal income tax. Self-employment tax pays for social security and medicare, normally employees and employers split those, the self-employed pay the full 15.3% themselves.
Self-employment tax is based on the business net profit, so any business expenses associated with this income can be used to offset income and reduce the tax liability. If you had to fly in and stay at a hotel, for example, those costs should be factored in.
In some cases, honoraria is mis-classified as Nonemployee Compensation (Box 7) instead of Other Income (Box 3). Which box is appropriate depends on the nature of your engagement, Other Income would typically not be subjected to self employment tax.
Edit: I was remembering common mis-classification issues at universities with fellowship income, not honoraria. Honoraria is sometimes mis-classified, but in your case I would guess Box 7 is proper, but could still be worth looking into further.
From my understanding, whilst this was all science and research stuff, I DID provide a 'service' as the IRS understands it and I can't safely claim this as a scholarship.
– A-Foreign-Scientist-2018
8 hours ago
10
Yes. If you were a poor person earning that amount in W2 wages, you'd have had the ~15% taken out before you even got your paycheck.
– jamesqf
7 hours ago
4
@paulj: Your memory is a bit lacking. The social security tax (larger portion of FICA stops), but not at 80k, more like 128k or 130k, The medicare portion doesn't stop, and in fact goes up (see "Additional Medicate Tax"; that threshold for that to kick in is typically 200k).
– Ben Voigt
7 hours ago
2
@GalacticCowboy: Yes, that half won't appear on a W2 or paycheck in any shape or form, it's already been taken out (as jamesqf said). The other half does appear as social security and medicare withholding. It's all a government scam to make you think social security and medicare are only costing you half as much as actually is being taken.
– Ben Voigt
4 hours ago
1
@paulj Social security is a net progressive tax because the benefits received climb slower than the tax paid. That is, you buy insurance for yourself, and you pay a progressive tax to subsidize insurance for people with lower incomes. The benefits hit a cap, which is why the tax also is capped.
– user71659
4 hours ago
|
show 5 more comments
Self-employment tax is basically you covering the medicare and social security "tax" that would have been covered by your employer if you were on their payroll. The standard deduction is for income tax that you should not be subject to. It does not apply to self-employment tax.
Note that if you were an employee, you still would have paid half of that amount (7.65%) in the form of withholdings from your paycheck.
2
If you were an employee, I'm pretty sure you would have paid exactly the same, no matter how it's phrased. We have the same system here, "half paid by employer, half by employee", and that always works out to the employee paying all of it. By nature, it's not a tax on the business, but a tax that takes some of what the company spends on the employee away from the employee.
– Nobody
4 hours ago
1
@Nobody Then your system is wrong. Employers are required to pay half of the medicare and social security tax and withhold the other half.
– D Stanley
4 hours ago
1
And your employer would’ve picked up the other half, which is why a self-employed worker pays twice as much.
– Davislor
4 hours ago
1
No, you misunderstand. Saying that the employer pays a part is just a book keeping trick. For both the employer and the employee, it's like the employee pays both parts. The employer only cares about total cost for the employee. The employee only cares about what they actually get to spend. The difference is the tax, no matter how you "divide" it between them both.
– Nobody
3 hours ago
@Nobody Not true. If an employer pays an employee $100 gross, their total cost is $107.60 - the salary plus their portion of FICA/MC. If they pay a contractor $100, their total cost is $100. The government gets $15 either way.
– D Stanley
3 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
protected by JoeTaxpayer♦ 4 hours ago
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The 15% you're seeing is self-employment tax. The standard deduction still applies, and you are not paying any federal income tax. Self-employment tax pays for social security and medicare, normally employees and employers split those, the self-employed pay the full 15.3% themselves.
Self-employment tax is based on the business net profit, so any business expenses associated with this income can be used to offset income and reduce the tax liability. If you had to fly in and stay at a hotel, for example, those costs should be factored in.
In some cases, honoraria is mis-classified as Nonemployee Compensation (Box 7) instead of Other Income (Box 3). Which box is appropriate depends on the nature of your engagement, Other Income would typically not be subjected to self employment tax.
Edit: I was remembering common mis-classification issues at universities with fellowship income, not honoraria. Honoraria is sometimes mis-classified, but in your case I would guess Box 7 is proper, but could still be worth looking into further.
From my understanding, whilst this was all science and research stuff, I DID provide a 'service' as the IRS understands it and I can't safely claim this as a scholarship.
– A-Foreign-Scientist-2018
8 hours ago
10
Yes. If you were a poor person earning that amount in W2 wages, you'd have had the ~15% taken out before you even got your paycheck.
– jamesqf
7 hours ago
4
@paulj: Your memory is a bit lacking. The social security tax (larger portion of FICA stops), but not at 80k, more like 128k or 130k, The medicare portion doesn't stop, and in fact goes up (see "Additional Medicate Tax"; that threshold for that to kick in is typically 200k).
– Ben Voigt
7 hours ago
2
@GalacticCowboy: Yes, that half won't appear on a W2 or paycheck in any shape or form, it's already been taken out (as jamesqf said). The other half does appear as social security and medicare withholding. It's all a government scam to make you think social security and medicare are only costing you half as much as actually is being taken.
– Ben Voigt
4 hours ago
1
@paulj Social security is a net progressive tax because the benefits received climb slower than the tax paid. That is, you buy insurance for yourself, and you pay a progressive tax to subsidize insurance for people with lower incomes. The benefits hit a cap, which is why the tax also is capped.
– user71659
4 hours ago
|
show 5 more comments
The 15% you're seeing is self-employment tax. The standard deduction still applies, and you are not paying any federal income tax. Self-employment tax pays for social security and medicare, normally employees and employers split those, the self-employed pay the full 15.3% themselves.
Self-employment tax is based on the business net profit, so any business expenses associated with this income can be used to offset income and reduce the tax liability. If you had to fly in and stay at a hotel, for example, those costs should be factored in.
In some cases, honoraria is mis-classified as Nonemployee Compensation (Box 7) instead of Other Income (Box 3). Which box is appropriate depends on the nature of your engagement, Other Income would typically not be subjected to self employment tax.
Edit: I was remembering common mis-classification issues at universities with fellowship income, not honoraria. Honoraria is sometimes mis-classified, but in your case I would guess Box 7 is proper, but could still be worth looking into further.
From my understanding, whilst this was all science and research stuff, I DID provide a 'service' as the IRS understands it and I can't safely claim this as a scholarship.
– A-Foreign-Scientist-2018
8 hours ago
10
Yes. If you were a poor person earning that amount in W2 wages, you'd have had the ~15% taken out before you even got your paycheck.
– jamesqf
7 hours ago
4
@paulj: Your memory is a bit lacking. The social security tax (larger portion of FICA stops), but not at 80k, more like 128k or 130k, The medicare portion doesn't stop, and in fact goes up (see "Additional Medicate Tax"; that threshold for that to kick in is typically 200k).
– Ben Voigt
7 hours ago
2
@GalacticCowboy: Yes, that half won't appear on a W2 or paycheck in any shape or form, it's already been taken out (as jamesqf said). The other half does appear as social security and medicare withholding. It's all a government scam to make you think social security and medicare are only costing you half as much as actually is being taken.
– Ben Voigt
4 hours ago
1
@paulj Social security is a net progressive tax because the benefits received climb slower than the tax paid. That is, you buy insurance for yourself, and you pay a progressive tax to subsidize insurance for people with lower incomes. The benefits hit a cap, which is why the tax also is capped.
– user71659
4 hours ago
|
show 5 more comments
The 15% you're seeing is self-employment tax. The standard deduction still applies, and you are not paying any federal income tax. Self-employment tax pays for social security and medicare, normally employees and employers split those, the self-employed pay the full 15.3% themselves.
Self-employment tax is based on the business net profit, so any business expenses associated with this income can be used to offset income and reduce the tax liability. If you had to fly in and stay at a hotel, for example, those costs should be factored in.
In some cases, honoraria is mis-classified as Nonemployee Compensation (Box 7) instead of Other Income (Box 3). Which box is appropriate depends on the nature of your engagement, Other Income would typically not be subjected to self employment tax.
Edit: I was remembering common mis-classification issues at universities with fellowship income, not honoraria. Honoraria is sometimes mis-classified, but in your case I would guess Box 7 is proper, but could still be worth looking into further.
The 15% you're seeing is self-employment tax. The standard deduction still applies, and you are not paying any federal income tax. Self-employment tax pays for social security and medicare, normally employees and employers split those, the self-employed pay the full 15.3% themselves.
Self-employment tax is based on the business net profit, so any business expenses associated with this income can be used to offset income and reduce the tax liability. If you had to fly in and stay at a hotel, for example, those costs should be factored in.
In some cases, honoraria is mis-classified as Nonemployee Compensation (Box 7) instead of Other Income (Box 3). Which box is appropriate depends on the nature of your engagement, Other Income would typically not be subjected to self employment tax.
Edit: I was remembering common mis-classification issues at universities with fellowship income, not honoraria. Honoraria is sometimes mis-classified, but in your case I would guess Box 7 is proper, but could still be worth looking into further.
edited 8 hours ago
answered 9 hours ago
Hart COHart CO
33k57793
33k57793
From my understanding, whilst this was all science and research stuff, I DID provide a 'service' as the IRS understands it and I can't safely claim this as a scholarship.
– A-Foreign-Scientist-2018
8 hours ago
10
Yes. If you were a poor person earning that amount in W2 wages, you'd have had the ~15% taken out before you even got your paycheck.
– jamesqf
7 hours ago
4
@paulj: Your memory is a bit lacking. The social security tax (larger portion of FICA stops), but not at 80k, more like 128k or 130k, The medicare portion doesn't stop, and in fact goes up (see "Additional Medicate Tax"; that threshold for that to kick in is typically 200k).
– Ben Voigt
7 hours ago
2
@GalacticCowboy: Yes, that half won't appear on a W2 or paycheck in any shape or form, it's already been taken out (as jamesqf said). The other half does appear as social security and medicare withholding. It's all a government scam to make you think social security and medicare are only costing you half as much as actually is being taken.
– Ben Voigt
4 hours ago
1
@paulj Social security is a net progressive tax because the benefits received climb slower than the tax paid. That is, you buy insurance for yourself, and you pay a progressive tax to subsidize insurance for people with lower incomes. The benefits hit a cap, which is why the tax also is capped.
– user71659
4 hours ago
|
show 5 more comments
From my understanding, whilst this was all science and research stuff, I DID provide a 'service' as the IRS understands it and I can't safely claim this as a scholarship.
– A-Foreign-Scientist-2018
8 hours ago
10
Yes. If you were a poor person earning that amount in W2 wages, you'd have had the ~15% taken out before you even got your paycheck.
– jamesqf
7 hours ago
4
@paulj: Your memory is a bit lacking. The social security tax (larger portion of FICA stops), but not at 80k, more like 128k or 130k, The medicare portion doesn't stop, and in fact goes up (see "Additional Medicate Tax"; that threshold for that to kick in is typically 200k).
– Ben Voigt
7 hours ago
2
@GalacticCowboy: Yes, that half won't appear on a W2 or paycheck in any shape or form, it's already been taken out (as jamesqf said). The other half does appear as social security and medicare withholding. It's all a government scam to make you think social security and medicare are only costing you half as much as actually is being taken.
– Ben Voigt
4 hours ago
1
@paulj Social security is a net progressive tax because the benefits received climb slower than the tax paid. That is, you buy insurance for yourself, and you pay a progressive tax to subsidize insurance for people with lower incomes. The benefits hit a cap, which is why the tax also is capped.
– user71659
4 hours ago
From my understanding, whilst this was all science and research stuff, I DID provide a 'service' as the IRS understands it and I can't safely claim this as a scholarship.
– A-Foreign-Scientist-2018
8 hours ago
From my understanding, whilst this was all science and research stuff, I DID provide a 'service' as the IRS understands it and I can't safely claim this as a scholarship.
– A-Foreign-Scientist-2018
8 hours ago
10
10
Yes. If you were a poor person earning that amount in W2 wages, you'd have had the ~15% taken out before you even got your paycheck.
– jamesqf
7 hours ago
Yes. If you were a poor person earning that amount in W2 wages, you'd have had the ~15% taken out before you even got your paycheck.
– jamesqf
7 hours ago
4
4
@paulj: Your memory is a bit lacking. The social security tax (larger portion of FICA stops), but not at 80k, more like 128k or 130k, The medicare portion doesn't stop, and in fact goes up (see "Additional Medicate Tax"; that threshold for that to kick in is typically 200k).
– Ben Voigt
7 hours ago
@paulj: Your memory is a bit lacking. The social security tax (larger portion of FICA stops), but not at 80k, more like 128k or 130k, The medicare portion doesn't stop, and in fact goes up (see "Additional Medicate Tax"; that threshold for that to kick in is typically 200k).
– Ben Voigt
7 hours ago
2
2
@GalacticCowboy: Yes, that half won't appear on a W2 or paycheck in any shape or form, it's already been taken out (as jamesqf said). The other half does appear as social security and medicare withholding. It's all a government scam to make you think social security and medicare are only costing you half as much as actually is being taken.
– Ben Voigt
4 hours ago
@GalacticCowboy: Yes, that half won't appear on a W2 or paycheck in any shape or form, it's already been taken out (as jamesqf said). The other half does appear as social security and medicare withholding. It's all a government scam to make you think social security and medicare are only costing you half as much as actually is being taken.
– Ben Voigt
4 hours ago
1
1
@paulj Social security is a net progressive tax because the benefits received climb slower than the tax paid. That is, you buy insurance for yourself, and you pay a progressive tax to subsidize insurance for people with lower incomes. The benefits hit a cap, which is why the tax also is capped.
– user71659
4 hours ago
@paulj Social security is a net progressive tax because the benefits received climb slower than the tax paid. That is, you buy insurance for yourself, and you pay a progressive tax to subsidize insurance for people with lower incomes. The benefits hit a cap, which is why the tax also is capped.
– user71659
4 hours ago
|
show 5 more comments
Self-employment tax is basically you covering the medicare and social security "tax" that would have been covered by your employer if you were on their payroll. The standard deduction is for income tax that you should not be subject to. It does not apply to self-employment tax.
Note that if you were an employee, you still would have paid half of that amount (7.65%) in the form of withholdings from your paycheck.
2
If you were an employee, I'm pretty sure you would have paid exactly the same, no matter how it's phrased. We have the same system here, "half paid by employer, half by employee", and that always works out to the employee paying all of it. By nature, it's not a tax on the business, but a tax that takes some of what the company spends on the employee away from the employee.
– Nobody
4 hours ago
1
@Nobody Then your system is wrong. Employers are required to pay half of the medicare and social security tax and withhold the other half.
– D Stanley
4 hours ago
1
And your employer would’ve picked up the other half, which is why a self-employed worker pays twice as much.
– Davislor
4 hours ago
1
No, you misunderstand. Saying that the employer pays a part is just a book keeping trick. For both the employer and the employee, it's like the employee pays both parts. The employer only cares about total cost for the employee. The employee only cares about what they actually get to spend. The difference is the tax, no matter how you "divide" it between them both.
– Nobody
3 hours ago
@Nobody Not true. If an employer pays an employee $100 gross, their total cost is $107.60 - the salary plus their portion of FICA/MC. If they pay a contractor $100, their total cost is $100. The government gets $15 either way.
– D Stanley
3 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
Self-employment tax is basically you covering the medicare and social security "tax" that would have been covered by your employer if you were on their payroll. The standard deduction is for income tax that you should not be subject to. It does not apply to self-employment tax.
Note that if you were an employee, you still would have paid half of that amount (7.65%) in the form of withholdings from your paycheck.
2
If you were an employee, I'm pretty sure you would have paid exactly the same, no matter how it's phrased. We have the same system here, "half paid by employer, half by employee", and that always works out to the employee paying all of it. By nature, it's not a tax on the business, but a tax that takes some of what the company spends on the employee away from the employee.
– Nobody
4 hours ago
1
@Nobody Then your system is wrong. Employers are required to pay half of the medicare and social security tax and withhold the other half.
– D Stanley
4 hours ago
1
And your employer would’ve picked up the other half, which is why a self-employed worker pays twice as much.
– Davislor
4 hours ago
1
No, you misunderstand. Saying that the employer pays a part is just a book keeping trick. For both the employer and the employee, it's like the employee pays both parts. The employer only cares about total cost for the employee. The employee only cares about what they actually get to spend. The difference is the tax, no matter how you "divide" it between them both.
– Nobody
3 hours ago
@Nobody Not true. If an employer pays an employee $100 gross, their total cost is $107.60 - the salary plus their portion of FICA/MC. If they pay a contractor $100, their total cost is $100. The government gets $15 either way.
– D Stanley
3 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
Self-employment tax is basically you covering the medicare and social security "tax" that would have been covered by your employer if you were on their payroll. The standard deduction is for income tax that you should not be subject to. It does not apply to self-employment tax.
Note that if you were an employee, you still would have paid half of that amount (7.65%) in the form of withholdings from your paycheck.
Self-employment tax is basically you covering the medicare and social security "tax" that would have been covered by your employer if you were on their payroll. The standard deduction is for income tax that you should not be subject to. It does not apply to self-employment tax.
Note that if you were an employee, you still would have paid half of that amount (7.65%) in the form of withholdings from your paycheck.
edited 1 hour ago
Brythan
17.8k64059
17.8k64059
answered 9 hours ago
D StanleyD Stanley
57.7k10169175
57.7k10169175
2
If you were an employee, I'm pretty sure you would have paid exactly the same, no matter how it's phrased. We have the same system here, "half paid by employer, half by employee", and that always works out to the employee paying all of it. By nature, it's not a tax on the business, but a tax that takes some of what the company spends on the employee away from the employee.
– Nobody
4 hours ago
1
@Nobody Then your system is wrong. Employers are required to pay half of the medicare and social security tax and withhold the other half.
– D Stanley
4 hours ago
1
And your employer would’ve picked up the other half, which is why a self-employed worker pays twice as much.
– Davislor
4 hours ago
1
No, you misunderstand. Saying that the employer pays a part is just a book keeping trick. For both the employer and the employee, it's like the employee pays both parts. The employer only cares about total cost for the employee. The employee only cares about what they actually get to spend. The difference is the tax, no matter how you "divide" it between them both.
– Nobody
3 hours ago
@Nobody Not true. If an employer pays an employee $100 gross, their total cost is $107.60 - the salary plus their portion of FICA/MC. If they pay a contractor $100, their total cost is $100. The government gets $15 either way.
– D Stanley
3 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
2
If you were an employee, I'm pretty sure you would have paid exactly the same, no matter how it's phrased. We have the same system here, "half paid by employer, half by employee", and that always works out to the employee paying all of it. By nature, it's not a tax on the business, but a tax that takes some of what the company spends on the employee away from the employee.
– Nobody
4 hours ago
1
@Nobody Then your system is wrong. Employers are required to pay half of the medicare and social security tax and withhold the other half.
– D Stanley
4 hours ago
1
And your employer would’ve picked up the other half, which is why a self-employed worker pays twice as much.
– Davislor
4 hours ago
1
No, you misunderstand. Saying that the employer pays a part is just a book keeping trick. For both the employer and the employee, it's like the employee pays both parts. The employer only cares about total cost for the employee. The employee only cares about what they actually get to spend. The difference is the tax, no matter how you "divide" it between them both.
– Nobody
3 hours ago
@Nobody Not true. If an employer pays an employee $100 gross, their total cost is $107.60 - the salary plus their portion of FICA/MC. If they pay a contractor $100, their total cost is $100. The government gets $15 either way.
– D Stanley
3 hours ago
2
2
If you were an employee, I'm pretty sure you would have paid exactly the same, no matter how it's phrased. We have the same system here, "half paid by employer, half by employee", and that always works out to the employee paying all of it. By nature, it's not a tax on the business, but a tax that takes some of what the company spends on the employee away from the employee.
– Nobody
4 hours ago
If you were an employee, I'm pretty sure you would have paid exactly the same, no matter how it's phrased. We have the same system here, "half paid by employer, half by employee", and that always works out to the employee paying all of it. By nature, it's not a tax on the business, but a tax that takes some of what the company spends on the employee away from the employee.
– Nobody
4 hours ago
1
1
@Nobody Then your system is wrong. Employers are required to pay half of the medicare and social security tax and withhold the other half.
– D Stanley
4 hours ago
@Nobody Then your system is wrong. Employers are required to pay half of the medicare and social security tax and withhold the other half.
– D Stanley
4 hours ago
1
1
And your employer would’ve picked up the other half, which is why a self-employed worker pays twice as much.
– Davislor
4 hours ago
And your employer would’ve picked up the other half, which is why a self-employed worker pays twice as much.
– Davislor
4 hours ago
1
1
No, you misunderstand. Saying that the employer pays a part is just a book keeping trick. For both the employer and the employee, it's like the employee pays both parts. The employer only cares about total cost for the employee. The employee only cares about what they actually get to spend. The difference is the tax, no matter how you "divide" it between them both.
– Nobody
3 hours ago
No, you misunderstand. Saying that the employer pays a part is just a book keeping trick. For both the employer and the employee, it's like the employee pays both parts. The employer only cares about total cost for the employee. The employee only cares about what they actually get to spend. The difference is the tax, no matter how you "divide" it between them both.
– Nobody
3 hours ago
@Nobody Not true. If an employer pays an employee $100 gross, their total cost is $107.60 - the salary plus their portion of FICA/MC. If they pay a contractor $100, their total cost is $100. The government gets $15 either way.
– D Stanley
3 hours ago
@Nobody Not true. If an employer pays an employee $100 gross, their total cost is $107.60 - the salary plus their portion of FICA/MC. If they pay a contractor $100, their total cost is $100. The government gets $15 either way.
– D Stanley
3 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
protected by JoeTaxpayer♦ 4 hours ago
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
5
As your user name says "A Foreign Scientist", check your visa against this list. There is a paragraph that develops this statement "A NONRESIDENT ALIEN is not liable for the self-employment tax." irs.gov/individuals/international-taxpayers/…
– user662852
8 hours ago
Thanks -- I have an I-765 EAD and therefore I am a resident alien.
– A-Foreign-Scientist-2018
8 hours ago
8
You will need to verify whether you are a non-resident for tax purposes - this is different from immigration definition. If you are a NR for tax, you cannot use Turbotax, as it does not offer support for this - find software that support form 1040NR (non resident).
– Najel
7 hours ago
1
@Davislor - the urban legend is about income tax, not just any random duty on a gallon of gas.
– Davor
2 hours ago