Why Is Death Allowed In the Matrix?Can the “mind” make injuries real like in the Matrix?Other than Neo Stopping the Machine Weapons, Are There Clues the Real World is Another Matrix?What did Zion think would happen to the blue pills if they succeeded in destroying the Matrix?If the Agents wanted Morpheus over Neo then why only use three agents?Relationship of illness outside the Matrix to illness inside the MatrixHow can they hack the Matrix, wirelessly?What happens to a person after they die in the Matrix?Why do the Matrix machines not implement a backup system?Are there signs that the Matrix holds any technological resemblance to out-of-universe computers?How did the first generation of people become born/plugged into the Matrix?

Test whether all array elements are factors of a number

Why was the small council so happy for Tyrion to become the Master of Coin?

Can an x86 CPU running in real mode be considered to be basically an 8086 CPU?

Can divisibility rules for digits be generalized to sum of digits

Languages that we cannot (dis)prove to be Context-Free

Why are 150k or 200k jobs considered good when there are 300k+ births a month?

Have astronauts in space suits ever taken selfies? If so, how?

What is the word for reserving something for yourself before others do?

Python: next in for loop

Is it important to consider tone, melody, and musical form while writing a song?

Is it unprofessional to ask if a job posting on GlassDoor is real?

strToHex ( string to its hex representation as string)

Can I ask the recruiters in my resume to put the reason why I am rejected?

Is this a crack on the carbon frame?

Why did Neo believe he could trust the machine when he asked for peace?

tikz: show 0 at the axis origin

Risk of getting Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) in the United States?

Why dont electromagnetic waves interact with each other?

What's the output of a record cartridge playing an out-of-speed record

"You are your self first supporter", a more proper way to say it

What do three bars across the stem of a note mean?

Why, historically, did Gödel think CH was false?

In Japanese, what’s the difference between “Tonari ni” (となりに) and “Tsugi” (つぎ)? When would you use one over the other?

"to be prejudice towards/against someone" vs "to be prejudiced against/towards someone"



Why Is Death Allowed In the Matrix?


Can the “mind” make injuries real like in the Matrix?Other than Neo Stopping the Machine Weapons, Are There Clues the Real World is Another Matrix?What did Zion think would happen to the blue pills if they succeeded in destroying the Matrix?If the Agents wanted Morpheus over Neo then why only use three agents?Relationship of illness outside the Matrix to illness inside the MatrixHow can they hack the Matrix, wirelessly?What happens to a person after they die in the Matrix?Why do the Matrix machines not implement a backup system?Are there signs that the Matrix holds any technological resemblance to out-of-universe computers?How did the first generation of people become born/plugged into the Matrix?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








11















It seems as if war/death/etc is just as common in the Matrix as it is in real life outside of the movie. When someone dies in the Matrix, they die in their pod, do they not? = Loss of a battery. That is a whole lot of wasted batteries. Why do the machines allow a world with so much death?










share|improve this question









New contributor




user113769 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 2





    There is no war inside the Matrix, as far as I'm aware. There are certainly a vanishingly small number of terrorists, but that's not the same thing

    – Valorum
    18 hours ago






  • 2





    then why the military helicopter and military complex? this means there is war. the world in the matrix (1990's) looks just like the real 1990's. Guns and gangs and drugs to boot. Why would the machines allow this?

    – user113769
    18 hours ago












  • You have to remember that Zion is a gigantic honeypot for malcontents and that The Matrix is designed to provide them with a series of escalating challenges ranging from local security, the police, the military and then finally Agents. It's only when The One arises that military buildings become accessible to the Zionese rebels.

    – Valorum
    18 hours ago






  • 9





    The matrix needs to feel real, otherwise people rebel and disbelieve in the fake reality, causing issues. I believe that there was a conversation in the movies that mentioned that the bots created a utopia like world, but it didn't take. In order for people to feel that it is real they would need wars and crime, and death would need to be permanent. My guess that over time the bots found the most efficient ratio of strife/death to peace to suit their needs.

    – Robert Hanson
    13 hours ago






  • 1





    user113769 Because active military defense is one of the ways you prevent wars.

    – Misha R
    12 hours ago

















11















It seems as if war/death/etc is just as common in the Matrix as it is in real life outside of the movie. When someone dies in the Matrix, they die in their pod, do they not? = Loss of a battery. That is a whole lot of wasted batteries. Why do the machines allow a world with so much death?










share|improve this question









New contributor




user113769 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 2





    There is no war inside the Matrix, as far as I'm aware. There are certainly a vanishingly small number of terrorists, but that's not the same thing

    – Valorum
    18 hours ago






  • 2





    then why the military helicopter and military complex? this means there is war. the world in the matrix (1990's) looks just like the real 1990's. Guns and gangs and drugs to boot. Why would the machines allow this?

    – user113769
    18 hours ago












  • You have to remember that Zion is a gigantic honeypot for malcontents and that The Matrix is designed to provide them with a series of escalating challenges ranging from local security, the police, the military and then finally Agents. It's only when The One arises that military buildings become accessible to the Zionese rebels.

    – Valorum
    18 hours ago






  • 9





    The matrix needs to feel real, otherwise people rebel and disbelieve in the fake reality, causing issues. I believe that there was a conversation in the movies that mentioned that the bots created a utopia like world, but it didn't take. In order for people to feel that it is real they would need wars and crime, and death would need to be permanent. My guess that over time the bots found the most efficient ratio of strife/death to peace to suit their needs.

    – Robert Hanson
    13 hours ago






  • 1





    user113769 Because active military defense is one of the ways you prevent wars.

    – Misha R
    12 hours ago













11












11








11


1






It seems as if war/death/etc is just as common in the Matrix as it is in real life outside of the movie. When someone dies in the Matrix, they die in their pod, do they not? = Loss of a battery. That is a whole lot of wasted batteries. Why do the machines allow a world with so much death?










share|improve this question









New contributor




user113769 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












It seems as if war/death/etc is just as common in the Matrix as it is in real life outside of the movie. When someone dies in the Matrix, they die in their pod, do they not? = Loss of a battery. That is a whole lot of wasted batteries. Why do the machines allow a world with so much death?







the-matrix






share|improve this question









New contributor




user113769 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




user113769 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 18 hours ago









Rebel-Scum

4,55042449




4,55042449






New contributor




user113769 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 18 hours ago









user113769user113769

564




564




New contributor




user113769 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





user113769 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






user113769 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 2





    There is no war inside the Matrix, as far as I'm aware. There are certainly a vanishingly small number of terrorists, but that's not the same thing

    – Valorum
    18 hours ago






  • 2





    then why the military helicopter and military complex? this means there is war. the world in the matrix (1990's) looks just like the real 1990's. Guns and gangs and drugs to boot. Why would the machines allow this?

    – user113769
    18 hours ago












  • You have to remember that Zion is a gigantic honeypot for malcontents and that The Matrix is designed to provide them with a series of escalating challenges ranging from local security, the police, the military and then finally Agents. It's only when The One arises that military buildings become accessible to the Zionese rebels.

    – Valorum
    18 hours ago






  • 9





    The matrix needs to feel real, otherwise people rebel and disbelieve in the fake reality, causing issues. I believe that there was a conversation in the movies that mentioned that the bots created a utopia like world, but it didn't take. In order for people to feel that it is real they would need wars and crime, and death would need to be permanent. My guess that over time the bots found the most efficient ratio of strife/death to peace to suit their needs.

    – Robert Hanson
    13 hours ago






  • 1





    user113769 Because active military defense is one of the ways you prevent wars.

    – Misha R
    12 hours ago












  • 2





    There is no war inside the Matrix, as far as I'm aware. There are certainly a vanishingly small number of terrorists, but that's not the same thing

    – Valorum
    18 hours ago






  • 2





    then why the military helicopter and military complex? this means there is war. the world in the matrix (1990's) looks just like the real 1990's. Guns and gangs and drugs to boot. Why would the machines allow this?

    – user113769
    18 hours ago












  • You have to remember that Zion is a gigantic honeypot for malcontents and that The Matrix is designed to provide them with a series of escalating challenges ranging from local security, the police, the military and then finally Agents. It's only when The One arises that military buildings become accessible to the Zionese rebels.

    – Valorum
    18 hours ago






  • 9





    The matrix needs to feel real, otherwise people rebel and disbelieve in the fake reality, causing issues. I believe that there was a conversation in the movies that mentioned that the bots created a utopia like world, but it didn't take. In order for people to feel that it is real they would need wars and crime, and death would need to be permanent. My guess that over time the bots found the most efficient ratio of strife/death to peace to suit their needs.

    – Robert Hanson
    13 hours ago






  • 1





    user113769 Because active military defense is one of the ways you prevent wars.

    – Misha R
    12 hours ago







2




2





There is no war inside the Matrix, as far as I'm aware. There are certainly a vanishingly small number of terrorists, but that's not the same thing

– Valorum
18 hours ago





There is no war inside the Matrix, as far as I'm aware. There are certainly a vanishingly small number of terrorists, but that's not the same thing

– Valorum
18 hours ago




2




2





then why the military helicopter and military complex? this means there is war. the world in the matrix (1990's) looks just like the real 1990's. Guns and gangs and drugs to boot. Why would the machines allow this?

– user113769
18 hours ago






then why the military helicopter and military complex? this means there is war. the world in the matrix (1990's) looks just like the real 1990's. Guns and gangs and drugs to boot. Why would the machines allow this?

– user113769
18 hours ago














You have to remember that Zion is a gigantic honeypot for malcontents and that The Matrix is designed to provide them with a series of escalating challenges ranging from local security, the police, the military and then finally Agents. It's only when The One arises that military buildings become accessible to the Zionese rebels.

– Valorum
18 hours ago





You have to remember that Zion is a gigantic honeypot for malcontents and that The Matrix is designed to provide them with a series of escalating challenges ranging from local security, the police, the military and then finally Agents. It's only when The One arises that military buildings become accessible to the Zionese rebels.

– Valorum
18 hours ago




9




9





The matrix needs to feel real, otherwise people rebel and disbelieve in the fake reality, causing issues. I believe that there was a conversation in the movies that mentioned that the bots created a utopia like world, but it didn't take. In order for people to feel that it is real they would need wars and crime, and death would need to be permanent. My guess that over time the bots found the most efficient ratio of strife/death to peace to suit their needs.

– Robert Hanson
13 hours ago





The matrix needs to feel real, otherwise people rebel and disbelieve in the fake reality, causing issues. I believe that there was a conversation in the movies that mentioned that the bots created a utopia like world, but it didn't take. In order for people to feel that it is real they would need wars and crime, and death would need to be permanent. My guess that over time the bots found the most efficient ratio of strife/death to peace to suit their needs.

– Robert Hanson
13 hours ago




1




1





user113769 Because active military defense is one of the ways you prevent wars.

– Misha R
12 hours ago





user113769 Because active military defense is one of the ways you prevent wars.

– Misha R
12 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















16














People wear out



Bodies are bodies; they decline after a certain age and eventually fail for some reason or another. The machines can't change that, and given humans' relatively fecund nature, they have no driving reason to.



Maybe being sealed into a support coffin slightly lowers life expectancy. Maybe is increases it. But the humans are going to die eventually no matter what.



To run with the battery analogy, batteries wear out. After some number of recharges, their ability to hold a charge gets less, and your four-year-old cell phone has half the battery life that it had when new. Time to recycle!



People would notice, and be bothered by, the lack of death



The architect describes the Paradise Matrix:




[it] simulated a perfect world with no suffering to try to pacify
their minds, but the human minds did not accept this version. Many of
those connected died, and a Nightmare Matrix was designed in its place
that tried to correct its flaws.




Accordingly, even if there was no need for War, the Nightmare Matrix that we see must have War, and Famine, and Conquest, and especially Death. Humans would notice. Humans would be uneasy. Humans would fail.



Men... Men are weak.






share|improve this answer






























    6














    The first matrix did not allow that.



    First quote is from Smith, second from Architect.




    Did you know that the first Matrix was designed to be a perfect human world where none suffered, where everyone would be happy? It was a disaster. No one would accept the program. Entire crops were lost. Some believed that we lacked the programming language to describe your "perfect world". But I believe that, as a species, human beings define their reality through misery and suffering. So the perfect world was a dream that your primitive cerebrum kept trying to wake up from.



    The first Matrix I designed was quite naturally perfect; it was a work of art, flawless, sublime. A triumph equalled only by its monumental failure.




    However, since large number of batteries rejected the program, it was redesigned not to be perfect.




    The inevitability of its doom is apparent to me now as a consequence of the imperfection inherent in every human being. Thus I redesigned it, based on your history, to more accurately reflect the varying grotesqueries of your nature.




    Human nature, according to the architect, has grotesqueries that includes war and loss. Even though this design failed as well. The Oracle was created to better understand human nature. However, even the Oracle did not remove war and loss. While there is no direct quotation to support it, it is immediately deducible that Oracle find these aspects useful as well.



    Long story short, Matrix was redesigned in a way that most of the batteries accepted the program. Loss of a few crops was acceptable as long as the majority did not revolt against it.






    share|improve this answer
































      1














      While the other two answers correctly address the point about the need for an "imperfect" world stated in the movies, I think there might be a different approach related to your question: you say that dying in the Matrix means dying in the real world...



      It's true the other way around, too



      The machines need to consume humans to live; this means disconnecting them from the Matrix and swallowing them whole (as shown in one scene in the first movie I believe); this means killing them both in the real world AND inside the Matrix.



      So, when the machines need energy, they need to disconnect as much humans as needed. They just "translate" it to the Matrix as those humans dying by whatever means neccesary.



      Having a perfect world where no one suffers doesn't necessarily means no one dies. It might just mean everybody gets whatever they want whenever they want it, or maybe when someone died they were just replaced by somenone else. With an imperfect world, you have just more normal, natural ways of dying. Need a battery? Make someone sick or have an accident or just old. Need thousands of batteries? Cause a war or a terrorist attack here and there and cover your real worlds needs inside the simulation.






      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      Josh Part is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.















      • 8





        I think you've misunderstood. The machines don't "eat" the human dead, they liquify them to make food for other humans.

        – Valorum
        9 hours ago











      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "186"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );






      user113769 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f208599%2fwhy-is-death-allowed-in-the-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      16














      People wear out



      Bodies are bodies; they decline after a certain age and eventually fail for some reason or another. The machines can't change that, and given humans' relatively fecund nature, they have no driving reason to.



      Maybe being sealed into a support coffin slightly lowers life expectancy. Maybe is increases it. But the humans are going to die eventually no matter what.



      To run with the battery analogy, batteries wear out. After some number of recharges, their ability to hold a charge gets less, and your four-year-old cell phone has half the battery life that it had when new. Time to recycle!



      People would notice, and be bothered by, the lack of death



      The architect describes the Paradise Matrix:




      [it] simulated a perfect world with no suffering to try to pacify
      their minds, but the human minds did not accept this version. Many of
      those connected died, and a Nightmare Matrix was designed in its place
      that tried to correct its flaws.




      Accordingly, even if there was no need for War, the Nightmare Matrix that we see must have War, and Famine, and Conquest, and especially Death. Humans would notice. Humans would be uneasy. Humans would fail.



      Men... Men are weak.






      share|improve this answer



























        16














        People wear out



        Bodies are bodies; they decline after a certain age and eventually fail for some reason or another. The machines can't change that, and given humans' relatively fecund nature, they have no driving reason to.



        Maybe being sealed into a support coffin slightly lowers life expectancy. Maybe is increases it. But the humans are going to die eventually no matter what.



        To run with the battery analogy, batteries wear out. After some number of recharges, their ability to hold a charge gets less, and your four-year-old cell phone has half the battery life that it had when new. Time to recycle!



        People would notice, and be bothered by, the lack of death



        The architect describes the Paradise Matrix:




        [it] simulated a perfect world with no suffering to try to pacify
        their minds, but the human minds did not accept this version. Many of
        those connected died, and a Nightmare Matrix was designed in its place
        that tried to correct its flaws.




        Accordingly, even if there was no need for War, the Nightmare Matrix that we see must have War, and Famine, and Conquest, and especially Death. Humans would notice. Humans would be uneasy. Humans would fail.



        Men... Men are weak.






        share|improve this answer

























          16












          16








          16







          People wear out



          Bodies are bodies; they decline after a certain age and eventually fail for some reason or another. The machines can't change that, and given humans' relatively fecund nature, they have no driving reason to.



          Maybe being sealed into a support coffin slightly lowers life expectancy. Maybe is increases it. But the humans are going to die eventually no matter what.



          To run with the battery analogy, batteries wear out. After some number of recharges, their ability to hold a charge gets less, and your four-year-old cell phone has half the battery life that it had when new. Time to recycle!



          People would notice, and be bothered by, the lack of death



          The architect describes the Paradise Matrix:




          [it] simulated a perfect world with no suffering to try to pacify
          their minds, but the human minds did not accept this version. Many of
          those connected died, and a Nightmare Matrix was designed in its place
          that tried to correct its flaws.




          Accordingly, even if there was no need for War, the Nightmare Matrix that we see must have War, and Famine, and Conquest, and especially Death. Humans would notice. Humans would be uneasy. Humans would fail.



          Men... Men are weak.






          share|improve this answer













          People wear out



          Bodies are bodies; they decline after a certain age and eventually fail for some reason or another. The machines can't change that, and given humans' relatively fecund nature, they have no driving reason to.



          Maybe being sealed into a support coffin slightly lowers life expectancy. Maybe is increases it. But the humans are going to die eventually no matter what.



          To run with the battery analogy, batteries wear out. After some number of recharges, their ability to hold a charge gets less, and your four-year-old cell phone has half the battery life that it had when new. Time to recycle!



          People would notice, and be bothered by, the lack of death



          The architect describes the Paradise Matrix:




          [it] simulated a perfect world with no suffering to try to pacify
          their minds, but the human minds did not accept this version. Many of
          those connected died, and a Nightmare Matrix was designed in its place
          that tried to correct its flaws.




          Accordingly, even if there was no need for War, the Nightmare Matrix that we see must have War, and Famine, and Conquest, and especially Death. Humans would notice. Humans would be uneasy. Humans would fail.



          Men... Men are weak.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 16 hours ago









          gowenfawrgowenfawr

          17.2k65074




          17.2k65074























              6














              The first matrix did not allow that.



              First quote is from Smith, second from Architect.




              Did you know that the first Matrix was designed to be a perfect human world where none suffered, where everyone would be happy? It was a disaster. No one would accept the program. Entire crops were lost. Some believed that we lacked the programming language to describe your "perfect world". But I believe that, as a species, human beings define their reality through misery and suffering. So the perfect world was a dream that your primitive cerebrum kept trying to wake up from.



              The first Matrix I designed was quite naturally perfect; it was a work of art, flawless, sublime. A triumph equalled only by its monumental failure.




              However, since large number of batteries rejected the program, it was redesigned not to be perfect.




              The inevitability of its doom is apparent to me now as a consequence of the imperfection inherent in every human being. Thus I redesigned it, based on your history, to more accurately reflect the varying grotesqueries of your nature.




              Human nature, according to the architect, has grotesqueries that includes war and loss. Even though this design failed as well. The Oracle was created to better understand human nature. However, even the Oracle did not remove war and loss. While there is no direct quotation to support it, it is immediately deducible that Oracle find these aspects useful as well.



              Long story short, Matrix was redesigned in a way that most of the batteries accepted the program. Loss of a few crops was acceptable as long as the majority did not revolt against it.






              share|improve this answer





























                6














                The first matrix did not allow that.



                First quote is from Smith, second from Architect.




                Did you know that the first Matrix was designed to be a perfect human world where none suffered, where everyone would be happy? It was a disaster. No one would accept the program. Entire crops were lost. Some believed that we lacked the programming language to describe your "perfect world". But I believe that, as a species, human beings define their reality through misery and suffering. So the perfect world was a dream that your primitive cerebrum kept trying to wake up from.



                The first Matrix I designed was quite naturally perfect; it was a work of art, flawless, sublime. A triumph equalled only by its monumental failure.




                However, since large number of batteries rejected the program, it was redesigned not to be perfect.




                The inevitability of its doom is apparent to me now as a consequence of the imperfection inherent in every human being. Thus I redesigned it, based on your history, to more accurately reflect the varying grotesqueries of your nature.




                Human nature, according to the architect, has grotesqueries that includes war and loss. Even though this design failed as well. The Oracle was created to better understand human nature. However, even the Oracle did not remove war and loss. While there is no direct quotation to support it, it is immediately deducible that Oracle find these aspects useful as well.



                Long story short, Matrix was redesigned in a way that most of the batteries accepted the program. Loss of a few crops was acceptable as long as the majority did not revolt against it.






                share|improve this answer



























                  6












                  6








                  6







                  The first matrix did not allow that.



                  First quote is from Smith, second from Architect.




                  Did you know that the first Matrix was designed to be a perfect human world where none suffered, where everyone would be happy? It was a disaster. No one would accept the program. Entire crops were lost. Some believed that we lacked the programming language to describe your "perfect world". But I believe that, as a species, human beings define their reality through misery and suffering. So the perfect world was a dream that your primitive cerebrum kept trying to wake up from.



                  The first Matrix I designed was quite naturally perfect; it was a work of art, flawless, sublime. A triumph equalled only by its monumental failure.




                  However, since large number of batteries rejected the program, it was redesigned not to be perfect.




                  The inevitability of its doom is apparent to me now as a consequence of the imperfection inherent in every human being. Thus I redesigned it, based on your history, to more accurately reflect the varying grotesqueries of your nature.




                  Human nature, according to the architect, has grotesqueries that includes war and loss. Even though this design failed as well. The Oracle was created to better understand human nature. However, even the Oracle did not remove war and loss. While there is no direct quotation to support it, it is immediately deducible that Oracle find these aspects useful as well.



                  Long story short, Matrix was redesigned in a way that most of the batteries accepted the program. Loss of a few crops was acceptable as long as the majority did not revolt against it.






                  share|improve this answer















                  The first matrix did not allow that.



                  First quote is from Smith, second from Architect.




                  Did you know that the first Matrix was designed to be a perfect human world where none suffered, where everyone would be happy? It was a disaster. No one would accept the program. Entire crops were lost. Some believed that we lacked the programming language to describe your "perfect world". But I believe that, as a species, human beings define their reality through misery and suffering. So the perfect world was a dream that your primitive cerebrum kept trying to wake up from.



                  The first Matrix I designed was quite naturally perfect; it was a work of art, flawless, sublime. A triumph equalled only by its monumental failure.




                  However, since large number of batteries rejected the program, it was redesigned not to be perfect.




                  The inevitability of its doom is apparent to me now as a consequence of the imperfection inherent in every human being. Thus I redesigned it, based on your history, to more accurately reflect the varying grotesqueries of your nature.




                  Human nature, according to the architect, has grotesqueries that includes war and loss. Even though this design failed as well. The Oracle was created to better understand human nature. However, even the Oracle did not remove war and loss. While there is no direct quotation to support it, it is immediately deducible that Oracle find these aspects useful as well.



                  Long story short, Matrix was redesigned in a way that most of the batteries accepted the program. Loss of a few crops was acceptable as long as the majority did not revolt against it.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 7 hours ago









                  Malandy

                  531315




                  531315










                  answered 16 hours ago









                  C.KocaC.Koca

                  4,6931954




                  4,6931954





















                      1














                      While the other two answers correctly address the point about the need for an "imperfect" world stated in the movies, I think there might be a different approach related to your question: you say that dying in the Matrix means dying in the real world...



                      It's true the other way around, too



                      The machines need to consume humans to live; this means disconnecting them from the Matrix and swallowing them whole (as shown in one scene in the first movie I believe); this means killing them both in the real world AND inside the Matrix.



                      So, when the machines need energy, they need to disconnect as much humans as needed. They just "translate" it to the Matrix as those humans dying by whatever means neccesary.



                      Having a perfect world where no one suffers doesn't necessarily means no one dies. It might just mean everybody gets whatever they want whenever they want it, or maybe when someone died they were just replaced by somenone else. With an imperfect world, you have just more normal, natural ways of dying. Need a battery? Make someone sick or have an accident or just old. Need thousands of batteries? Cause a war or a terrorist attack here and there and cover your real worlds needs inside the simulation.






                      share|improve this answer








                      New contributor




                      Josh Part is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.















                      • 8





                        I think you've misunderstood. The machines don't "eat" the human dead, they liquify them to make food for other humans.

                        – Valorum
                        9 hours ago















                      1














                      While the other two answers correctly address the point about the need for an "imperfect" world stated in the movies, I think there might be a different approach related to your question: you say that dying in the Matrix means dying in the real world...



                      It's true the other way around, too



                      The machines need to consume humans to live; this means disconnecting them from the Matrix and swallowing them whole (as shown in one scene in the first movie I believe); this means killing them both in the real world AND inside the Matrix.



                      So, when the machines need energy, they need to disconnect as much humans as needed. They just "translate" it to the Matrix as those humans dying by whatever means neccesary.



                      Having a perfect world where no one suffers doesn't necessarily means no one dies. It might just mean everybody gets whatever they want whenever they want it, or maybe when someone died they were just replaced by somenone else. With an imperfect world, you have just more normal, natural ways of dying. Need a battery? Make someone sick or have an accident or just old. Need thousands of batteries? Cause a war or a terrorist attack here and there and cover your real worlds needs inside the simulation.






                      share|improve this answer








                      New contributor




                      Josh Part is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.















                      • 8





                        I think you've misunderstood. The machines don't "eat" the human dead, they liquify them to make food for other humans.

                        – Valorum
                        9 hours ago













                      1












                      1








                      1







                      While the other two answers correctly address the point about the need for an "imperfect" world stated in the movies, I think there might be a different approach related to your question: you say that dying in the Matrix means dying in the real world...



                      It's true the other way around, too



                      The machines need to consume humans to live; this means disconnecting them from the Matrix and swallowing them whole (as shown in one scene in the first movie I believe); this means killing them both in the real world AND inside the Matrix.



                      So, when the machines need energy, they need to disconnect as much humans as needed. They just "translate" it to the Matrix as those humans dying by whatever means neccesary.



                      Having a perfect world where no one suffers doesn't necessarily means no one dies. It might just mean everybody gets whatever they want whenever they want it, or maybe when someone died they were just replaced by somenone else. With an imperfect world, you have just more normal, natural ways of dying. Need a battery? Make someone sick or have an accident or just old. Need thousands of batteries? Cause a war or a terrorist attack here and there and cover your real worlds needs inside the simulation.






                      share|improve this answer








                      New contributor




                      Josh Part is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.










                      While the other two answers correctly address the point about the need for an "imperfect" world stated in the movies, I think there might be a different approach related to your question: you say that dying in the Matrix means dying in the real world...



                      It's true the other way around, too



                      The machines need to consume humans to live; this means disconnecting them from the Matrix and swallowing them whole (as shown in one scene in the first movie I believe); this means killing them both in the real world AND inside the Matrix.



                      So, when the machines need energy, they need to disconnect as much humans as needed. They just "translate" it to the Matrix as those humans dying by whatever means neccesary.



                      Having a perfect world where no one suffers doesn't necessarily means no one dies. It might just mean everybody gets whatever they want whenever they want it, or maybe when someone died they were just replaced by somenone else. With an imperfect world, you have just more normal, natural ways of dying. Need a battery? Make someone sick or have an accident or just old. Need thousands of batteries? Cause a war or a terrorist attack here and there and cover your real worlds needs inside the simulation.







                      share|improve this answer








                      New contributor




                      Josh Part is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer






                      New contributor




                      Josh Part is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                      answered 9 hours ago









                      Josh PartJosh Part

                      1191




                      1191




                      New contributor




                      Josh Part is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.





                      New contributor





                      Josh Part is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.






                      Josh Part is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.







                      • 8





                        I think you've misunderstood. The machines don't "eat" the human dead, they liquify them to make food for other humans.

                        – Valorum
                        9 hours ago












                      • 8





                        I think you've misunderstood. The machines don't "eat" the human dead, they liquify them to make food for other humans.

                        – Valorum
                        9 hours ago







                      8




                      8





                      I think you've misunderstood. The machines don't "eat" the human dead, they liquify them to make food for other humans.

                      – Valorum
                      9 hours ago





                      I think you've misunderstood. The machines don't "eat" the human dead, they liquify them to make food for other humans.

                      – Valorum
                      9 hours ago










                      user113769 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      user113769 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      user113769 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                      user113769 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f208599%2fwhy-is-death-allowed-in-the-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Reverse int within the 32-bit signed integer range: [−2^31, 2^31 − 1]Combining two 32-bit integers into one 64-bit integerDetermine if an int is within rangeLossy packing 32 bit integer to 16 bitComputing the square root of a 64-bit integerKeeping integer addition within boundsSafe multiplication of two 64-bit signed integersLeetcode 10: Regular Expression MatchingSigned integer-to-ascii x86_64 assembler macroReverse the digits of an Integer“Add two numbers given in reverse order from a linked list”

                      Category:Fedor von Bock Media in category "Fedor von Bock"Navigation menuUpload mediaISNI: 0000 0000 5511 3417VIAF ID: 24712551GND ID: 119294796Library of Congress authority ID: n96068363BnF ID: 12534305fSUDOC authorities ID: 034604189Open Library ID: OL338253ANKCR AUT ID: jn19990000869National Library of Israel ID: 000514068National Thesaurus for Author Names ID: 341574317ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

                      Kiel Indholdsfortegnelse Historie | Transport og færgeforbindelser | Sejlsport og anden sport | Kultur | Kendte personer fra Kiel | Noter | Litteratur | Eksterne henvisninger | Navigationsmenuwww.kiel.de54°19′31″N 10°8′26″Ø / 54.32528°N 10.14056°Ø / 54.32528; 10.14056Oberbürgermeister Dr. Ulf Kämpferwww.statistik-nord.deDen danske Stats StatistikKiels hjemmesiderrrWorldCat312794080n790547494030481-4