Test whether all array elements are factors of a numberSearching array reports “not found” even though it's foundPHP: Delete an element from an arrayDeleting array elements in JavaScript - delete vs spliceWhy is setTimeout(fn, 0) sometimes useful?How do I determine whether an array contains a particular value in Java?Determine whether an array contains a valueGet the first element of an arrayGet all unique values in a JavaScript array (remove duplicates)How do I remove a particular element from an array in JavaScript?How can I add new array elements at the beginning of an array in Javascript?How does PHP 'foreach' actually work?

How does one intimidate enemies without having the capacity for violence?

Python: next in for loop

To string or not to string

How can bays and straits be determined in a procedurally generated map?

Today is the Center

Modeling an IPv4 Address

Is it important to consider tone, melody, and musical form while writing a song?

Did Shadowfax go to Valinor?

Animated Series: Alien black spider robot crashes on Earth

Approximately how much travel time was saved by the opening of the Suez Canal in 1869?

"to be prejudice towards/against someone" vs "to be prejudiced against/towards someone"

Show that if two triangles built on parallel lines, with equal bases have the same perimeter only if they are congruent.

Why are electrically insulating heatsinks so rare? Is it just cost?

Why do I get two different answers for this counting problem?

can i play a electric guitar through a bass amp?

The Two and the One

Can divisibility rules for digits be generalized to sum of digits

Dragon forelimb placement

If I cast Expeditious Retreat, can I Dash as a bonus action on the same turn?

Why can't I see bouncing of a switch on an oscilloscope?

Is it tax fraud for an individual to declare non-taxable revenue as taxable income? (US tax laws)

Why dont electromagnetic waves interact with each other?

Can a Warlock become Neutral Good?

What does CI-V stand for?



Test whether all array elements are factors of a number


Searching array reports “not found” even though it's foundPHP: Delete an element from an arrayDeleting array elements in JavaScript - delete vs spliceWhy is setTimeout(fn, 0) sometimes useful?How do I determine whether an array contains a particular value in Java?Determine whether an array contains a valueGet the first element of an arrayGet all unique values in a JavaScript array (remove duplicates)How do I remove a particular element from an array in JavaScript?How can I add new array elements at the beginning of an array in Javascript?How does PHP 'foreach' actually work?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








7















I have the following question:




Write a function that returns true if all integers in an array are factors of a number, and false otherwise.




I tried the code below:






function checkFactors(factors, num) 

for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
let element = factors[i];
console.log(element)

if (num % element !== 0)
return false

else
return true




console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12)) //➞ false





My solution returns true which is wrong. I know it's the else statement that's messing it up. But I want to understand why the else statement can't go there.










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    You should get the return true out of the loop ;) and leave the return false inside the loop :) The reason for it is that otherwise your loop really stops after the first checking, returning either true or false, and you want it to return false as soon as something is not a factor. The return true outside of the loop would then indicate that all numbers supplied where factors of the number argument

    – Icepickle
    17 hours ago







  • 2





    FYI, it's not just you, this is one of the most common errors people make when they first start out with programming and loops. :-)

    – T.J. Crowder
    17 hours ago






  • 1





    @t.j.crowder yet we don't have a good dupetarget for it.

    – Jonas Wilms
    17 hours ago






  • 2





    @JonasWilms - Yeah, I bookmarked this one on the basis that there isn't a lot of extraneous stuff, it really is just the earlier return thing. :-)

    – T.J. Crowder
    17 hours ago











  • @T.J.Crowder stackoverflow.com/questions/42913798/… is the general dupe I wrote for this class of problems.

    – Barmar
    11 hours ago


















7















I have the following question:




Write a function that returns true if all integers in an array are factors of a number, and false otherwise.




I tried the code below:






function checkFactors(factors, num) 

for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
let element = factors[i];
console.log(element)

if (num % element !== 0)
return false

else
return true




console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12)) //➞ false





My solution returns true which is wrong. I know it's the else statement that's messing it up. But I want to understand why the else statement can't go there.










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    You should get the return true out of the loop ;) and leave the return false inside the loop :) The reason for it is that otherwise your loop really stops after the first checking, returning either true or false, and you want it to return false as soon as something is not a factor. The return true outside of the loop would then indicate that all numbers supplied where factors of the number argument

    – Icepickle
    17 hours ago







  • 2





    FYI, it's not just you, this is one of the most common errors people make when they first start out with programming and loops. :-)

    – T.J. Crowder
    17 hours ago






  • 1





    @t.j.crowder yet we don't have a good dupetarget for it.

    – Jonas Wilms
    17 hours ago






  • 2





    @JonasWilms - Yeah, I bookmarked this one on the basis that there isn't a lot of extraneous stuff, it really is just the earlier return thing. :-)

    – T.J. Crowder
    17 hours ago











  • @T.J.Crowder stackoverflow.com/questions/42913798/… is the general dupe I wrote for this class of problems.

    – Barmar
    11 hours ago














7












7








7


1






I have the following question:




Write a function that returns true if all integers in an array are factors of a number, and false otherwise.




I tried the code below:






function checkFactors(factors, num) 

for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
let element = factors[i];
console.log(element)

if (num % element !== 0)
return false

else
return true




console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12)) //➞ false





My solution returns true which is wrong. I know it's the else statement that's messing it up. But I want to understand why the else statement can't go there.










share|improve this question
















I have the following question:




Write a function that returns true if all integers in an array are factors of a number, and false otherwise.




I tried the code below:






function checkFactors(factors, num) 

for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
let element = factors[i];
console.log(element)

if (num % element !== 0)
return false

else
return true




console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12)) //➞ false





My solution returns true which is wrong. I know it's the else statement that's messing it up. But I want to understand why the else statement can't go there.






function checkFactors(factors, num) 

for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
let element = factors[i];
console.log(element)

if (num % element !== 0)
return false

else
return true




console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12)) //➞ false





function checkFactors(factors, num) 

for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
let element = factors[i];
console.log(element)

if (num % element !== 0)
return false

else
return true




console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12)) //➞ false






javascript arrays loops if-statement






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 13 hours ago









isanae

2,53711437




2,53711437










asked 17 hours ago









PineNuts0PineNuts0

87431432




87431432







  • 2





    You should get the return true out of the loop ;) and leave the return false inside the loop :) The reason for it is that otherwise your loop really stops after the first checking, returning either true or false, and you want it to return false as soon as something is not a factor. The return true outside of the loop would then indicate that all numbers supplied where factors of the number argument

    – Icepickle
    17 hours ago







  • 2





    FYI, it's not just you, this is one of the most common errors people make when they first start out with programming and loops. :-)

    – T.J. Crowder
    17 hours ago






  • 1





    @t.j.crowder yet we don't have a good dupetarget for it.

    – Jonas Wilms
    17 hours ago






  • 2





    @JonasWilms - Yeah, I bookmarked this one on the basis that there isn't a lot of extraneous stuff, it really is just the earlier return thing. :-)

    – T.J. Crowder
    17 hours ago











  • @T.J.Crowder stackoverflow.com/questions/42913798/… is the general dupe I wrote for this class of problems.

    – Barmar
    11 hours ago













  • 2





    You should get the return true out of the loop ;) and leave the return false inside the loop :) The reason for it is that otherwise your loop really stops after the first checking, returning either true or false, and you want it to return false as soon as something is not a factor. The return true outside of the loop would then indicate that all numbers supplied where factors of the number argument

    – Icepickle
    17 hours ago







  • 2





    FYI, it's not just you, this is one of the most common errors people make when they first start out with programming and loops. :-)

    – T.J. Crowder
    17 hours ago






  • 1





    @t.j.crowder yet we don't have a good dupetarget for it.

    – Jonas Wilms
    17 hours ago






  • 2





    @JonasWilms - Yeah, I bookmarked this one on the basis that there isn't a lot of extraneous stuff, it really is just the earlier return thing. :-)

    – T.J. Crowder
    17 hours ago











  • @T.J.Crowder stackoverflow.com/questions/42913798/… is the general dupe I wrote for this class of problems.

    – Barmar
    11 hours ago








2




2





You should get the return true out of the loop ;) and leave the return false inside the loop :) The reason for it is that otherwise your loop really stops after the first checking, returning either true or false, and you want it to return false as soon as something is not a factor. The return true outside of the loop would then indicate that all numbers supplied where factors of the number argument

– Icepickle
17 hours ago






You should get the return true out of the loop ;) and leave the return false inside the loop :) The reason for it is that otherwise your loop really stops after the first checking, returning either true or false, and you want it to return false as soon as something is not a factor. The return true outside of the loop would then indicate that all numbers supplied where factors of the number argument

– Icepickle
17 hours ago





2




2





FYI, it's not just you, this is one of the most common errors people make when they first start out with programming and loops. :-)

– T.J. Crowder
17 hours ago





FYI, it's not just you, this is one of the most common errors people make when they first start out with programming and loops. :-)

– T.J. Crowder
17 hours ago




1




1





@t.j.crowder yet we don't have a good dupetarget for it.

– Jonas Wilms
17 hours ago





@t.j.crowder yet we don't have a good dupetarget for it.

– Jonas Wilms
17 hours ago




2




2





@JonasWilms - Yeah, I bookmarked this one on the basis that there isn't a lot of extraneous stuff, it really is just the earlier return thing. :-)

– T.J. Crowder
17 hours ago





@JonasWilms - Yeah, I bookmarked this one on the basis that there isn't a lot of extraneous stuff, it really is just the earlier return thing. :-)

– T.J. Crowder
17 hours ago













@T.J.Crowder stackoverflow.com/questions/42913798/… is the general dupe I wrote for this class of problems.

– Barmar
11 hours ago






@T.J.Crowder stackoverflow.com/questions/42913798/… is the general dupe I wrote for this class of problems.

– Barmar
11 hours ago













5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















5














Just place return true out of for loop,



If you keep return true in else part as soon as any of value which does not satisfies num % element !== 0 your code will return true which should not happen in this case as you're checking for all the values in array should be factor of given number




Let's understand by 1st example




  • On first element in array 1 it will check if condition num % element !== 0 which turns out false, so it will go to else condition and return true from function and will not check for rest of values.

  • So you need to keep return true at the end so if any of the value in loop doesn't satisfy the if condition than only control will go to return true




function checkFactors(factors, num) 

for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
let element = factors[i];
if (num % element !== 0)
return false


return true




console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12)) //➞ false
console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2))






In short - In such case where you want all of them must match a condition as a thumb rule you can consider it like




  1. keep the failing case return value inside for loop

  2. keep the passing case return value at the end of function

JS have a inbuilt method Array.every for such cases






function checkFactors(factors, num) 
return factors.every(element => num % element === 0);

console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));








share|improve this answer
































    7














    You are working in a chocolate store, and your boss tells you to check wether all chocolates (there are chili chocolate, caramel chocolate and coffee chocolate) are delicious. He tells you the following:



    Go through all chocolates, and for each chocolate, taste it, if it is fine, tell me that everything is fine, otherwise tell me that something is wrong¹



    You start with the first chocolate, which is chili chocolate, it tastes delucious, you go to your boss and tell him that everything is fine. Your boss yells at you because you haven't tasted the caramel chocolate and the coffee chocolate yet.



    You realize that your boss actually wanted you to do:



    Go through the chocolates, for each chocolate, taste it, if it doesnt taste well tell, tell me immeadiately, otherwise continue until you tasted them all, then return to me and tell me that everything is fine.²



    Or in code:



     // ¹
    function checkChocolates(chocolates)
    for(const chocolate of chocolates)
    if(isTasty(chocolate))
    return true;
    else
    return false;




    // ²
    function checkChocolates(chocolates)
    for(const chocolate of chocolates)
    if(isTasty(chocolate))
    continue; // this could be omitted, as a loop keeps looping nevertheless
    else
    return false;


    return true;



    As this is a very common task in programming, there is already a shorter way to express this:



     if(chocolates.every(isTasty)) 
    alert("all chocolates are fine");
    else
    alert("Oh, that doesnt taste good");



    whereas isTasty is a function taking a chocolate and returning either true or false.




    If you didn't grasp it yet, just try it out! Buy some chocolate, and taste it! If someone tells you "eating choclate isn't learning", respond with "I'm doing rubber duck debugging" and no one can complain :)






    share|improve this answer




















    • 1





      A tiny quibble - it's "chocolate", not "choclate".

      – Wai Ha Lee
      16 hours ago






    • 1





      @waiHaLee oh, pronounciation tricked me ...

      – Jonas Wilms
      16 hours ago


















    1














    Inside the loop the input num was was tested for divisibility, if the num was divisible the control was going in the else block from where the function returned true.



    The loop was not checking for all numbers of the input array it was returning true when the first number was divisible.



    Just use a flag variable to see if all of the elements are divisible by the input number num, if any one is not divisible the flag will set to false and then we can break out of the loop and return it as there is no point to check the other numbers.






    function checkFactors(factors, num) 
    let flag = true;
    for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
    let element = factors[i];
    if (num % element !== 0)
    flag = false;
    break;


    return flag;


    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));
    console.log(checkFactors([2, 4, 3, 6, 9], 12));
    console.log(checkFactors([3, 5, 2, 6, 9], 15));
    console.log(checkFactors([4, 2, 8, 1], 16));





    You can also use Array.every to check the same in a concise way:






    function checkFactors(factors, num) 
    return factors.every(element => num % element === 0);

    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));
    console.log(checkFactors([2, 4, 3, 6, 9], 12));
    console.log(checkFactors([3, 5, 2, 6, 9], 15));
    console.log(checkFactors([4, 2, 8, 1], 16));








    share|improve this answer
































      0














      Yes, "else" causing the issue. I removed it and added "return true" outside of for loop.



      function checkFactors(factors, num) 

      for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
      let element = factors[i];
      console.log(element)

      if (num % element !== 0)
      return false


      return true;






      share|improve this answer


















      • 1





        He is looking for an explanation as well though

        – Icepickle
        17 hours ago











      • I see Icepickle has explained in the question comments nicely! Jonas Wilms's answer too.

        – javapedia.net
        17 hours ago



















      0














      Your code's logic is wrong. You should check all the array's Elements, if all elements satisfy the condition, return true, but if one of them not satisfy the condition, return false immediately. The else means one item satisfy the condition, but not all elements. That's where the problem is.






      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      W.Bright is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















        Your Answer






        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
        StackExchange.snippets.init();
        );
        );
        , "code-snippets");

        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "1"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader:
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        ,
        onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );













        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55549338%2ftest-whether-all-array-elements-are-factors-of-a-number%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        5 Answers
        5






        active

        oldest

        votes








        5 Answers
        5






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        5














        Just place return true out of for loop,



        If you keep return true in else part as soon as any of value which does not satisfies num % element !== 0 your code will return true which should not happen in this case as you're checking for all the values in array should be factor of given number




        Let's understand by 1st example




        • On first element in array 1 it will check if condition num % element !== 0 which turns out false, so it will go to else condition and return true from function and will not check for rest of values.

        • So you need to keep return true at the end so if any of the value in loop doesn't satisfy the if condition than only control will go to return true




        function checkFactors(factors, num) 

        for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
        let element = factors[i];
        if (num % element !== 0)
        return false


        return true




        console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12)) //➞ false
        console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2))






        In short - In such case where you want all of them must match a condition as a thumb rule you can consider it like




        1. keep the failing case return value inside for loop

        2. keep the passing case return value at the end of function

        JS have a inbuilt method Array.every for such cases






        function checkFactors(factors, num) 
        return factors.every(element => num % element === 0);

        console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
        console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));








        share|improve this answer





























          5














          Just place return true out of for loop,



          If you keep return true in else part as soon as any of value which does not satisfies num % element !== 0 your code will return true which should not happen in this case as you're checking for all the values in array should be factor of given number




          Let's understand by 1st example




          • On first element in array 1 it will check if condition num % element !== 0 which turns out false, so it will go to else condition and return true from function and will not check for rest of values.

          • So you need to keep return true at the end so if any of the value in loop doesn't satisfy the if condition than only control will go to return true




          function checkFactors(factors, num) 

          for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
          let element = factors[i];
          if (num % element !== 0)
          return false


          return true




          console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12)) //➞ false
          console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2))






          In short - In such case where you want all of them must match a condition as a thumb rule you can consider it like




          1. keep the failing case return value inside for loop

          2. keep the passing case return value at the end of function

          JS have a inbuilt method Array.every for such cases






          function checkFactors(factors, num) 
          return factors.every(element => num % element === 0);

          console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
          console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));








          share|improve this answer



























            5












            5








            5







            Just place return true out of for loop,



            If you keep return true in else part as soon as any of value which does not satisfies num % element !== 0 your code will return true which should not happen in this case as you're checking for all the values in array should be factor of given number




            Let's understand by 1st example




            • On first element in array 1 it will check if condition num % element !== 0 which turns out false, so it will go to else condition and return true from function and will not check for rest of values.

            • So you need to keep return true at the end so if any of the value in loop doesn't satisfy the if condition than only control will go to return true




            function checkFactors(factors, num) 

            for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
            let element = factors[i];
            if (num % element !== 0)
            return false


            return true




            console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12)) //➞ false
            console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2))






            In short - In such case where you want all of them must match a condition as a thumb rule you can consider it like




            1. keep the failing case return value inside for loop

            2. keep the passing case return value at the end of function

            JS have a inbuilt method Array.every for such cases






            function checkFactors(factors, num) 
            return factors.every(element => num % element === 0);

            console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
            console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));








            share|improve this answer















            Just place return true out of for loop,



            If you keep return true in else part as soon as any of value which does not satisfies num % element !== 0 your code will return true which should not happen in this case as you're checking for all the values in array should be factor of given number




            Let's understand by 1st example




            • On first element in array 1 it will check if condition num % element !== 0 which turns out false, so it will go to else condition and return true from function and will not check for rest of values.

            • So you need to keep return true at the end so if any of the value in loop doesn't satisfy the if condition than only control will go to return true




            function checkFactors(factors, num) 

            for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
            let element = factors[i];
            if (num % element !== 0)
            return false


            return true




            console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12)) //➞ false
            console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2))






            In short - In such case where you want all of them must match a condition as a thumb rule you can consider it like




            1. keep the failing case return value inside for loop

            2. keep the passing case return value at the end of function

            JS have a inbuilt method Array.every for such cases






            function checkFactors(factors, num) 
            return factors.every(element => num % element === 0);

            console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
            console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));








            function checkFactors(factors, num) 

            for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
            let element = factors[i];
            if (num % element !== 0)
            return false


            return true




            console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12)) //➞ false
            console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2))





            function checkFactors(factors, num) 

            for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
            let element = factors[i];
            if (num % element !== 0)
            return false


            return true




            console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12)) //➞ false
            console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2))





            function checkFactors(factors, num) 
            return factors.every(element => num % element === 0);

            console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
            console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));





            function checkFactors(factors, num) 
            return factors.every(element => num % element === 0);

            console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
            console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));






            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 13 hours ago

























            answered 17 hours ago









            Code ManiacCode Maniac

            11.5k2833




            11.5k2833























                7














                You are working in a chocolate store, and your boss tells you to check wether all chocolates (there are chili chocolate, caramel chocolate and coffee chocolate) are delicious. He tells you the following:



                Go through all chocolates, and for each chocolate, taste it, if it is fine, tell me that everything is fine, otherwise tell me that something is wrong¹



                You start with the first chocolate, which is chili chocolate, it tastes delucious, you go to your boss and tell him that everything is fine. Your boss yells at you because you haven't tasted the caramel chocolate and the coffee chocolate yet.



                You realize that your boss actually wanted you to do:



                Go through the chocolates, for each chocolate, taste it, if it doesnt taste well tell, tell me immeadiately, otherwise continue until you tasted them all, then return to me and tell me that everything is fine.²



                Or in code:



                 // ¹
                function checkChocolates(chocolates)
                for(const chocolate of chocolates)
                if(isTasty(chocolate))
                return true;
                else
                return false;




                // ²
                function checkChocolates(chocolates)
                for(const chocolate of chocolates)
                if(isTasty(chocolate))
                continue; // this could be omitted, as a loop keeps looping nevertheless
                else
                return false;


                return true;



                As this is a very common task in programming, there is already a shorter way to express this:



                 if(chocolates.every(isTasty)) 
                alert("all chocolates are fine");
                else
                alert("Oh, that doesnt taste good");



                whereas isTasty is a function taking a chocolate and returning either true or false.




                If you didn't grasp it yet, just try it out! Buy some chocolate, and taste it! If someone tells you "eating choclate isn't learning", respond with "I'm doing rubber duck debugging" and no one can complain :)






                share|improve this answer




















                • 1





                  A tiny quibble - it's "chocolate", not "choclate".

                  – Wai Ha Lee
                  16 hours ago






                • 1





                  @waiHaLee oh, pronounciation tricked me ...

                  – Jonas Wilms
                  16 hours ago















                7














                You are working in a chocolate store, and your boss tells you to check wether all chocolates (there are chili chocolate, caramel chocolate and coffee chocolate) are delicious. He tells you the following:



                Go through all chocolates, and for each chocolate, taste it, if it is fine, tell me that everything is fine, otherwise tell me that something is wrong¹



                You start with the first chocolate, which is chili chocolate, it tastes delucious, you go to your boss and tell him that everything is fine. Your boss yells at you because you haven't tasted the caramel chocolate and the coffee chocolate yet.



                You realize that your boss actually wanted you to do:



                Go through the chocolates, for each chocolate, taste it, if it doesnt taste well tell, tell me immeadiately, otherwise continue until you tasted them all, then return to me and tell me that everything is fine.²



                Or in code:



                 // ¹
                function checkChocolates(chocolates)
                for(const chocolate of chocolates)
                if(isTasty(chocolate))
                return true;
                else
                return false;




                // ²
                function checkChocolates(chocolates)
                for(const chocolate of chocolates)
                if(isTasty(chocolate))
                continue; // this could be omitted, as a loop keeps looping nevertheless
                else
                return false;


                return true;



                As this is a very common task in programming, there is already a shorter way to express this:



                 if(chocolates.every(isTasty)) 
                alert("all chocolates are fine");
                else
                alert("Oh, that doesnt taste good");



                whereas isTasty is a function taking a chocolate and returning either true or false.




                If you didn't grasp it yet, just try it out! Buy some chocolate, and taste it! If someone tells you "eating choclate isn't learning", respond with "I'm doing rubber duck debugging" and no one can complain :)






                share|improve this answer




















                • 1





                  A tiny quibble - it's "chocolate", not "choclate".

                  – Wai Ha Lee
                  16 hours ago






                • 1





                  @waiHaLee oh, pronounciation tricked me ...

                  – Jonas Wilms
                  16 hours ago













                7












                7








                7







                You are working in a chocolate store, and your boss tells you to check wether all chocolates (there are chili chocolate, caramel chocolate and coffee chocolate) are delicious. He tells you the following:



                Go through all chocolates, and for each chocolate, taste it, if it is fine, tell me that everything is fine, otherwise tell me that something is wrong¹



                You start with the first chocolate, which is chili chocolate, it tastes delucious, you go to your boss and tell him that everything is fine. Your boss yells at you because you haven't tasted the caramel chocolate and the coffee chocolate yet.



                You realize that your boss actually wanted you to do:



                Go through the chocolates, for each chocolate, taste it, if it doesnt taste well tell, tell me immeadiately, otherwise continue until you tasted them all, then return to me and tell me that everything is fine.²



                Or in code:



                 // ¹
                function checkChocolates(chocolates)
                for(const chocolate of chocolates)
                if(isTasty(chocolate))
                return true;
                else
                return false;




                // ²
                function checkChocolates(chocolates)
                for(const chocolate of chocolates)
                if(isTasty(chocolate))
                continue; // this could be omitted, as a loop keeps looping nevertheless
                else
                return false;


                return true;



                As this is a very common task in programming, there is already a shorter way to express this:



                 if(chocolates.every(isTasty)) 
                alert("all chocolates are fine");
                else
                alert("Oh, that doesnt taste good");



                whereas isTasty is a function taking a chocolate and returning either true or false.




                If you didn't grasp it yet, just try it out! Buy some chocolate, and taste it! If someone tells you "eating choclate isn't learning", respond with "I'm doing rubber duck debugging" and no one can complain :)






                share|improve this answer















                You are working in a chocolate store, and your boss tells you to check wether all chocolates (there are chili chocolate, caramel chocolate and coffee chocolate) are delicious. He tells you the following:



                Go through all chocolates, and for each chocolate, taste it, if it is fine, tell me that everything is fine, otherwise tell me that something is wrong¹



                You start with the first chocolate, which is chili chocolate, it tastes delucious, you go to your boss and tell him that everything is fine. Your boss yells at you because you haven't tasted the caramel chocolate and the coffee chocolate yet.



                You realize that your boss actually wanted you to do:



                Go through the chocolates, for each chocolate, taste it, if it doesnt taste well tell, tell me immeadiately, otherwise continue until you tasted them all, then return to me and tell me that everything is fine.²



                Or in code:



                 // ¹
                function checkChocolates(chocolates)
                for(const chocolate of chocolates)
                if(isTasty(chocolate))
                return true;
                else
                return false;




                // ²
                function checkChocolates(chocolates)
                for(const chocolate of chocolates)
                if(isTasty(chocolate))
                continue; // this could be omitted, as a loop keeps looping nevertheless
                else
                return false;


                return true;



                As this is a very common task in programming, there is already a shorter way to express this:



                 if(chocolates.every(isTasty)) 
                alert("all chocolates are fine");
                else
                alert("Oh, that doesnt taste good");



                whereas isTasty is a function taking a chocolate and returning either true or false.




                If you didn't grasp it yet, just try it out! Buy some chocolate, and taste it! If someone tells you "eating choclate isn't learning", respond with "I'm doing rubber duck debugging" and no one can complain :)







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited 16 hours ago

























                answered 17 hours ago









                Jonas WilmsJonas Wilms

                65.4k53660




                65.4k53660







                • 1





                  A tiny quibble - it's "chocolate", not "choclate".

                  – Wai Ha Lee
                  16 hours ago






                • 1





                  @waiHaLee oh, pronounciation tricked me ...

                  – Jonas Wilms
                  16 hours ago












                • 1





                  A tiny quibble - it's "chocolate", not "choclate".

                  – Wai Ha Lee
                  16 hours ago






                • 1





                  @waiHaLee oh, pronounciation tricked me ...

                  – Jonas Wilms
                  16 hours ago







                1




                1





                A tiny quibble - it's "chocolate", not "choclate".

                – Wai Ha Lee
                16 hours ago





                A tiny quibble - it's "chocolate", not "choclate".

                – Wai Ha Lee
                16 hours ago




                1




                1





                @waiHaLee oh, pronounciation tricked me ...

                – Jonas Wilms
                16 hours ago





                @waiHaLee oh, pronounciation tricked me ...

                – Jonas Wilms
                16 hours ago











                1














                Inside the loop the input num was was tested for divisibility, if the num was divisible the control was going in the else block from where the function returned true.



                The loop was not checking for all numbers of the input array it was returning true when the first number was divisible.



                Just use a flag variable to see if all of the elements are divisible by the input number num, if any one is not divisible the flag will set to false and then we can break out of the loop and return it as there is no point to check the other numbers.






                function checkFactors(factors, num) 
                let flag = true;
                for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
                let element = factors[i];
                if (num % element !== 0)
                flag = false;
                break;


                return flag;


                console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
                console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));
                console.log(checkFactors([2, 4, 3, 6, 9], 12));
                console.log(checkFactors([3, 5, 2, 6, 9], 15));
                console.log(checkFactors([4, 2, 8, 1], 16));





                You can also use Array.every to check the same in a concise way:






                function checkFactors(factors, num) 
                return factors.every(element => num % element === 0);

                console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
                console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));
                console.log(checkFactors([2, 4, 3, 6, 9], 12));
                console.log(checkFactors([3, 5, 2, 6, 9], 15));
                console.log(checkFactors([4, 2, 8, 1], 16));








                share|improve this answer





























                  1














                  Inside the loop the input num was was tested for divisibility, if the num was divisible the control was going in the else block from where the function returned true.



                  The loop was not checking for all numbers of the input array it was returning true when the first number was divisible.



                  Just use a flag variable to see if all of the elements are divisible by the input number num, if any one is not divisible the flag will set to false and then we can break out of the loop and return it as there is no point to check the other numbers.






                  function checkFactors(factors, num) 
                  let flag = true;
                  for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
                  let element = factors[i];
                  if (num % element !== 0)
                  flag = false;
                  break;


                  return flag;


                  console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
                  console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));
                  console.log(checkFactors([2, 4, 3, 6, 9], 12));
                  console.log(checkFactors([3, 5, 2, 6, 9], 15));
                  console.log(checkFactors([4, 2, 8, 1], 16));





                  You can also use Array.every to check the same in a concise way:






                  function checkFactors(factors, num) 
                  return factors.every(element => num % element === 0);

                  console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
                  console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));
                  console.log(checkFactors([2, 4, 3, 6, 9], 12));
                  console.log(checkFactors([3, 5, 2, 6, 9], 15));
                  console.log(checkFactors([4, 2, 8, 1], 16));








                  share|improve this answer



























                    1












                    1








                    1







                    Inside the loop the input num was was tested for divisibility, if the num was divisible the control was going in the else block from where the function returned true.



                    The loop was not checking for all numbers of the input array it was returning true when the first number was divisible.



                    Just use a flag variable to see if all of the elements are divisible by the input number num, if any one is not divisible the flag will set to false and then we can break out of the loop and return it as there is no point to check the other numbers.






                    function checkFactors(factors, num) 
                    let flag = true;
                    for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
                    let element = factors[i];
                    if (num % element !== 0)
                    flag = false;
                    break;


                    return flag;


                    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
                    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));
                    console.log(checkFactors([2, 4, 3, 6, 9], 12));
                    console.log(checkFactors([3, 5, 2, 6, 9], 15));
                    console.log(checkFactors([4, 2, 8, 1], 16));





                    You can also use Array.every to check the same in a concise way:






                    function checkFactors(factors, num) 
                    return factors.every(element => num % element === 0);

                    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
                    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));
                    console.log(checkFactors([2, 4, 3, 6, 9], 12));
                    console.log(checkFactors([3, 5, 2, 6, 9], 15));
                    console.log(checkFactors([4, 2, 8, 1], 16));








                    share|improve this answer















                    Inside the loop the input num was was tested for divisibility, if the num was divisible the control was going in the else block from where the function returned true.



                    The loop was not checking for all numbers of the input array it was returning true when the first number was divisible.



                    Just use a flag variable to see if all of the elements are divisible by the input number num, if any one is not divisible the flag will set to false and then we can break out of the loop and return it as there is no point to check the other numbers.






                    function checkFactors(factors, num) 
                    let flag = true;
                    for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
                    let element = factors[i];
                    if (num % element !== 0)
                    flag = false;
                    break;


                    return flag;


                    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
                    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));
                    console.log(checkFactors([2, 4, 3, 6, 9], 12));
                    console.log(checkFactors([3, 5, 2, 6, 9], 15));
                    console.log(checkFactors([4, 2, 8, 1], 16));





                    You can also use Array.every to check the same in a concise way:






                    function checkFactors(factors, num) 
                    return factors.every(element => num % element === 0);

                    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
                    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));
                    console.log(checkFactors([2, 4, 3, 6, 9], 12));
                    console.log(checkFactors([3, 5, 2, 6, 9], 15));
                    console.log(checkFactors([4, 2, 8, 1], 16));








                    function checkFactors(factors, num) 
                    let flag = true;
                    for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
                    let element = factors[i];
                    if (num % element !== 0)
                    flag = false;
                    break;


                    return flag;


                    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
                    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));
                    console.log(checkFactors([2, 4, 3, 6, 9], 12));
                    console.log(checkFactors([3, 5, 2, 6, 9], 15));
                    console.log(checkFactors([4, 2, 8, 1], 16));





                    function checkFactors(factors, num) 
                    let flag = true;
                    for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
                    let element = factors[i];
                    if (num % element !== 0)
                    flag = false;
                    break;


                    return flag;


                    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
                    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));
                    console.log(checkFactors([2, 4, 3, 6, 9], 12));
                    console.log(checkFactors([3, 5, 2, 6, 9], 15));
                    console.log(checkFactors([4, 2, 8, 1], 16));





                    function checkFactors(factors, num) 
                    return factors.every(element => num % element === 0);

                    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
                    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));
                    console.log(checkFactors([2, 4, 3, 6, 9], 12));
                    console.log(checkFactors([3, 5, 2, 6, 9], 15));
                    console.log(checkFactors([4, 2, 8, 1], 16));





                    function checkFactors(factors, num) 
                    return factors.every(element => num % element === 0);

                    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
                    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));
                    console.log(checkFactors([2, 4, 3, 6, 9], 12));
                    console.log(checkFactors([3, 5, 2, 6, 9], 15));
                    console.log(checkFactors([4, 2, 8, 1], 16));






                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited 16 hours ago

























                    answered 17 hours ago









                    Amardeep BhowmickAmardeep Bhowmick

                    5,38321128




                    5,38321128





















                        0














                        Yes, "else" causing the issue. I removed it and added "return true" outside of for loop.



                        function checkFactors(factors, num) 

                        for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
                        let element = factors[i];
                        console.log(element)

                        if (num % element !== 0)
                        return false


                        return true;






                        share|improve this answer


















                        • 1





                          He is looking for an explanation as well though

                          – Icepickle
                          17 hours ago











                        • I see Icepickle has explained in the question comments nicely! Jonas Wilms's answer too.

                          – javapedia.net
                          17 hours ago
















                        0














                        Yes, "else" causing the issue. I removed it and added "return true" outside of for loop.



                        function checkFactors(factors, num) 

                        for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
                        let element = factors[i];
                        console.log(element)

                        if (num % element !== 0)
                        return false


                        return true;






                        share|improve this answer


















                        • 1





                          He is looking for an explanation as well though

                          – Icepickle
                          17 hours ago











                        • I see Icepickle has explained in the question comments nicely! Jonas Wilms's answer too.

                          – javapedia.net
                          17 hours ago














                        0












                        0








                        0







                        Yes, "else" causing the issue. I removed it and added "return true" outside of for loop.



                        function checkFactors(factors, num) 

                        for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
                        let element = factors[i];
                        console.log(element)

                        if (num % element !== 0)
                        return false


                        return true;






                        share|improve this answer













                        Yes, "else" causing the issue. I removed it and added "return true" outside of for loop.



                        function checkFactors(factors, num) 

                        for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
                        let element = factors[i];
                        console.log(element)

                        if (num % element !== 0)
                        return false


                        return true;







                        share|improve this answer












                        share|improve this answer



                        share|improve this answer










                        answered 17 hours ago









                        javapedia.netjavapedia.net

                        567312




                        567312







                        • 1





                          He is looking for an explanation as well though

                          – Icepickle
                          17 hours ago











                        • I see Icepickle has explained in the question comments nicely! Jonas Wilms's answer too.

                          – javapedia.net
                          17 hours ago













                        • 1





                          He is looking for an explanation as well though

                          – Icepickle
                          17 hours ago











                        • I see Icepickle has explained in the question comments nicely! Jonas Wilms's answer too.

                          – javapedia.net
                          17 hours ago








                        1




                        1





                        He is looking for an explanation as well though

                        – Icepickle
                        17 hours ago





                        He is looking for an explanation as well though

                        – Icepickle
                        17 hours ago













                        I see Icepickle has explained in the question comments nicely! Jonas Wilms's answer too.

                        – javapedia.net
                        17 hours ago






                        I see Icepickle has explained in the question comments nicely! Jonas Wilms's answer too.

                        – javapedia.net
                        17 hours ago












                        0














                        Your code's logic is wrong. You should check all the array's Elements, if all elements satisfy the condition, return true, but if one of them not satisfy the condition, return false immediately. The else means one item satisfy the condition, but not all elements. That's where the problem is.






                        share|improve this answer








                        New contributor




                        W.Bright is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                        Check out our Code of Conduct.
























                          0














                          Your code's logic is wrong. You should check all the array's Elements, if all elements satisfy the condition, return true, but if one of them not satisfy the condition, return false immediately. The else means one item satisfy the condition, but not all elements. That's where the problem is.






                          share|improve this answer








                          New contributor




                          W.Bright is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                          Check out our Code of Conduct.






















                            0












                            0








                            0







                            Your code's logic is wrong. You should check all the array's Elements, if all elements satisfy the condition, return true, but if one of them not satisfy the condition, return false immediately. The else means one item satisfy the condition, but not all elements. That's where the problem is.






                            share|improve this answer








                            New contributor




                            W.Bright is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.










                            Your code's logic is wrong. You should check all the array's Elements, if all elements satisfy the condition, return true, but if one of them not satisfy the condition, return false immediately. The else means one item satisfy the condition, but not all elements. That's where the problem is.







                            share|improve this answer








                            New contributor




                            W.Bright is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.









                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer






                            New contributor




                            W.Bright is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.









                            answered 16 hours ago









                            W.BrightW.Bright

                            133




                            133




                            New contributor




                            W.Bright is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.





                            New contributor





                            W.Bright is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.






                            W.Bright is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.



























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded
















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55549338%2ftest-whether-all-array-elements-are-factors-of-a-number%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Reverse int within the 32-bit signed integer range: [−2^31, 2^31 − 1]Combining two 32-bit integers into one 64-bit integerDetermine if an int is within rangeLossy packing 32 bit integer to 16 bitComputing the square root of a 64-bit integerKeeping integer addition within boundsSafe multiplication of two 64-bit signed integersLeetcode 10: Regular Expression MatchingSigned integer-to-ascii x86_64 assembler macroReverse the digits of an Integer“Add two numbers given in reverse order from a linked list”

                                Category:Fedor von Bock Media in category "Fedor von Bock"Navigation menuUpload mediaISNI: 0000 0000 5511 3417VIAF ID: 24712551GND ID: 119294796Library of Congress authority ID: n96068363BnF ID: 12534305fSUDOC authorities ID: 034604189Open Library ID: OL338253ANKCR AUT ID: jn19990000869National Library of Israel ID: 000514068National Thesaurus for Author Names ID: 341574317ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

                                Kiel Indholdsfortegnelse Historie | Transport og færgeforbindelser | Sejlsport og anden sport | Kultur | Kendte personer fra Kiel | Noter | Litteratur | Eksterne henvisninger | Navigationsmenuwww.kiel.de54°19′31″N 10°8′26″Ø / 54.32528°N 10.14056°Ø / 54.32528; 10.14056Oberbürgermeister Dr. Ulf Kämpferwww.statistik-nord.deDen danske Stats StatistikKiels hjemmesiderrrWorldCat312794080n790547494030481-4