Minkowski spaceMinkowski MetricMinkowski Metric SignatureMinkowski metric — why does it follow from the constancy of the speed of light?Minkowski spacetime: Is there a signature (+,+,+,+)?Minkowski spacetime vs Euclidian spaceMinkowski metric: Why does it look like it does?Understanding space-like hyperplanes in Minkowski spaceCausality in general relativityCan an a distance in Minkowski space, based on a Euclidean plane, be time-like?How to Construct Proper Spherical Coordinates in Minkowski Spacetime?
How can bays and straits be determined in a procedurally generated map?
Today is the Center
Example of a continuous function that don't have a continuous extension
How do I create uniquely male characters?
Prove that NP is closed under karp reduction?
Why "Having chlorophyll without photosynthesis is actually very dangerous" and "like living with a bomb"?
What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?
Accidentally leaked the solution to an assignment, what to do now? (I'm the prof)
I’m planning on buying a laser printer but concerned about the life cycle of toner in the machine
Writing rule which states that two causes for the same superpower is bad writing
Why did the Germans forbid the possession of pet pigeons in Rostov-on-Don in 1941?
How is the claim "I am in New York only if I am in America" the same as "If I am in New York, then I am in America?
Why doesn't H₄O²⁺ exist?
Approximately how much travel time was saved by the opening of the Suez Canal in 1869?
Why doesn't Newton's third law mean a person bounces back to where they started when they hit the ground?
The Two and the One
Can I make popcorn with any corn?
What's the point of deactivating Num Lock on login screens?
Why are electrically insulating heatsinks so rare? Is it just cost?
How to format long polynomial?
Do I have a twin with permutated remainders?
How does strength of boric acid solution increase in presence of salicylic acid?
What are these boxed doors outside store fronts in New York?
Arthur Somervell: 1000 Exercises - Meaning of this notation
Minkowski space
Minkowski MetricMinkowski Metric SignatureMinkowski metric — why does it follow from the constancy of the speed of light?Minkowski spacetime: Is there a signature (+,+,+,+)?Minkowski spacetime vs Euclidian spaceMinkowski metric: Why does it look like it does?Understanding space-like hyperplanes in Minkowski spaceCausality in general relativityCan an a distance in Minkowski space, based on a Euclidean plane, be time-like?How to Construct Proper Spherical Coordinates in Minkowski Spacetime?
$begingroup$
1) In Minkowski space, coordinates which satisfy
x2=t2-X2>0
Region of spacetime is time-like.
2) If its
x2=t2-X2<0
Region is space-like.
3) But if
x2=t2-X2=0
then its "trajectory of light-like particles".
I have understood the first two points about time and space like region but I could not get the third one about "light like particles".
My confusion is about why just light like particles? there are many other particles at quantum level.
special-relativity mass metric-tensor causality
edited 10 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
107k121991239
asked 10 hours ago
sk9298sk9298
625
New contributor
sk9298 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
1) In Minkowski space, coordinates which satisfy
x2=t2-X2>0
Region of spacetime is time-like.
2) If its
x2=t2-X2<0
Region is space-like.
3) But if
x2=t2-X2=0
then its "trajectory of light-like particles".
I have understood the first two points about time and space like region but I could not get the third one about "light like particles".
My confusion is about why just light like particles? there are many other particles at quantum level.
special-relativity mass metric-tensor causality
edited 10 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
107k121991239
asked 10 hours ago
sk9298sk9298
625
New contributor
sk9298 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
In the future, please use MathJax, not HTML markup, to display math. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– G. Smith
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
1) In Minkowski space, coordinates which satisfy
x2=t2-X2>0
Region of spacetime is time-like.
2) If its
x2=t2-X2<0
Region is space-like.
3) But if
x2=t2-X2=0
then its "trajectory of light-like particles".
I have understood the first two points about time and space like region but I could not get the third one about "light like particles".
My confusion is about why just light like particles? there are many other particles at quantum level.
special-relativity mass metric-tensor causality
edited 10 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
107k121991239
asked 10 hours ago
sk9298sk9298
625
New contributor
sk9298 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
1) In Minkowski space, coordinates which satisfy
x2=t2-X2>0
Region of spacetime is time-like.
2) If its
x2=t2-X2<0
Region is space-like.
3) But if
x2=t2-X2=0
then its "trajectory of light-like particles".
I have understood the first two points about time and space like region but I could not get the third one about "light like particles".
My confusion is about why just light like particles? there are many other particles at quantum level.
special-relativity mass metric-tensor causality
special-relativity mass metric-tensor causality
edited 10 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
107k121991239
asked 10 hours ago
sk9298sk9298
625
New contributor
sk9298 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 10 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
107k121991239
asked 10 hours ago
sk9298sk9298
625
New contributor
sk9298 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 10 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
107k121991239
edited 10 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
107k121991239
edited 10 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
107k121991239
107k121991239
asked 10 hours ago
sk9298sk9298
625
New contributor
sk9298 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 10 hours ago
sk9298sk9298
625
asked 10 hours ago
sk9298sk9298
625
625
New contributor
sk9298 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
sk9298 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
sk9298 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$begingroup$
In the future, please use MathJax, not HTML markup, to display math. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– G. Smith
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In the future, please use MathJax, not HTML markup, to display math. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– G. Smith
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
In the future, please use MathJax, not HTML markup, to display math. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– G. Smith
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
In the future, please use MathJax, not HTML markup, to display math. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– G. Smith
8 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
My confusion is about why just light like particles? there are many other particles at quantum level.
You are correct. The terminology is historical in nature. Light was the first massless particle to be discovered. The terminology “lightlike” was established before any other massless particles were discovered. Once other massless particles were discovered it was shown that they also travel along lightlike geodesics, but by then the term “lightlike” was well established.
An alternative term with the same meaning as “lightlike” is “null”. If you prefer then you can always use “null” and just understand that people saying “lightlike” mean the same thing.
answered 10 hours ago
DaleDale
6,6071829
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Only particles with zero mass can travel between two events which are separated by a light-like distance. The trajectory is called light-like because photons (light) are massless, and historically the first example of a massless particle, as well as the only example in the 1910's. There are other massless particles, like gluons which would also be able to travel between two events separated by a light-like distance.
The reason why only massless particles are able to travel between two events separated by a light-like distance is that it requires you to travel at exactly the speed of light. You can see this by considering the equation $t^2-x^2=0$, this means that $x=pm t$. These equations are with the units such that the speed of light $c=1$. Thus the particle taking this trajectory is travelling at the speed of light.
answered 10 hours ago
LucashWindowWasherLucashWindowWasher
32312
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "151"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
sk9298 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f470979%2fminkowski-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
My confusion is about why just light like particles? there are many other particles at quantum level.
You are correct. The terminology is historical in nature. Light was the first massless particle to be discovered. The terminology “lightlike” was established before any other massless particles were discovered. Once other massless particles were discovered it was shown that they also travel along lightlike geodesics, but by then the term “lightlike” was well established.
An alternative term with the same meaning as “lightlike” is “null”. If you prefer then you can always use “null” and just understand that people saying “lightlike” mean the same thing.
answered 10 hours ago
DaleDale
6,6071829
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My confusion is about why just light like particles? there are many other particles at quantum level.
You are correct. The terminology is historical in nature. Light was the first massless particle to be discovered. The terminology “lightlike” was established before any other massless particles were discovered. Once other massless particles were discovered it was shown that they also travel along lightlike geodesics, but by then the term “lightlike” was well established.
An alternative term with the same meaning as “lightlike” is “null”. If you prefer then you can always use “null” and just understand that people saying “lightlike” mean the same thing.
answered 10 hours ago
DaleDale
6,6071829
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My confusion is about why just light like particles? there are many other particles at quantum level.
You are correct. The terminology is historical in nature. Light was the first massless particle to be discovered. The terminology “lightlike” was established before any other massless particles were discovered. Once other massless particles were discovered it was shown that they also travel along lightlike geodesics, but by then the term “lightlike” was well established.
An alternative term with the same meaning as “lightlike” is “null”. If you prefer then you can always use “null” and just understand that people saying “lightlike” mean the same thing.
answered 10 hours ago
DaleDale
6,6071829
$endgroup$
My confusion is about why just light like particles? there are many other particles at quantum level.
You are correct. The terminology is historical in nature. Light was the first massless particle to be discovered. The terminology “lightlike” was established before any other massless particles were discovered. Once other massless particles were discovered it was shown that they also travel along lightlike geodesics, but by then the term “lightlike” was well established.
An alternative term with the same meaning as “lightlike” is “null”. If you prefer then you can always use “null” and just understand that people saying “lightlike” mean the same thing.
answered 10 hours ago
DaleDale
6,6071829
answered 10 hours ago
DaleDale
6,6071829
answered 10 hours ago
DaleDale
6,6071829
answered 10 hours ago
DaleDale
6,6071829
6,6071829
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Only particles with zero mass can travel between two events which are separated by a light-like distance. The trajectory is called light-like because photons (light) are massless, and historically the first example of a massless particle, as well as the only example in the 1910's. There are other massless particles, like gluons which would also be able to travel between two events separated by a light-like distance.
The reason why only massless particles are able to travel between two events separated by a light-like distance is that it requires you to travel at exactly the speed of light. You can see this by considering the equation $t^2-x^2=0$, this means that $x=pm t$. These equations are with the units such that the speed of light $c=1$. Thus the particle taking this trajectory is travelling at the speed of light.
answered 10 hours ago
LucashWindowWasherLucashWindowWasher
32312
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Only particles with zero mass can travel between two events which are separated by a light-like distance. The trajectory is called light-like because photons (light) are massless, and historically the first example of a massless particle, as well as the only example in the 1910's. There are other massless particles, like gluons which would also be able to travel between two events separated by a light-like distance.
The reason why only massless particles are able to travel between two events separated by a light-like distance is that it requires you to travel at exactly the speed of light. You can see this by considering the equation $t^2-x^2=0$, this means that $x=pm t$. These equations are with the units such that the speed of light $c=1$. Thus the particle taking this trajectory is travelling at the speed of light.
answered 10 hours ago
LucashWindowWasherLucashWindowWasher
32312
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Only particles with zero mass can travel between two events which are separated by a light-like distance. The trajectory is called light-like because photons (light) are massless, and historically the first example of a massless particle, as well as the only example in the 1910's. There are other massless particles, like gluons which would also be able to travel between two events separated by a light-like distance.
The reason why only massless particles are able to travel between two events separated by a light-like distance is that it requires you to travel at exactly the speed of light. You can see this by considering the equation $t^2-x^2=0$, this means that $x=pm t$. These equations are with the units such that the speed of light $c=1$. Thus the particle taking this trajectory is travelling at the speed of light.
answered 10 hours ago
LucashWindowWasherLucashWindowWasher
32312
$endgroup$
Only particles with zero mass can travel between two events which are separated by a light-like distance. The trajectory is called light-like because photons (light) are massless, and historically the first example of a massless particle, as well as the only example in the 1910's. There are other massless particles, like gluons which would also be able to travel between two events separated by a light-like distance.
The reason why only massless particles are able to travel between two events separated by a light-like distance is that it requires you to travel at exactly the speed of light. You can see this by considering the equation $t^2-x^2=0$, this means that $x=pm t$. These equations are with the units such that the speed of light $c=1$. Thus the particle taking this trajectory is travelling at the speed of light.
answered 10 hours ago
LucashWindowWasherLucashWindowWasher
32312
answered 10 hours ago
LucashWindowWasherLucashWindowWasher
32312
answered 10 hours ago
LucashWindowWasherLucashWindowWasher
32312
answered 10 hours ago
LucashWindowWasherLucashWindowWasher
32312
32312
add a comment |
add a comment |
sk9298 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
sk9298 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
sk9298 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
sk9298 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f470979%2fminkowski-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
In the future, please use MathJax, not HTML markup, to display math. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– G. Smith
8 hours ago