Get name of standard action overriden in Visualforce contorller The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are Inapex:actionFunction action doesn't seem to work the same as apex:commandButton actionVisualforce page(table) doesn't rerenderShowing visualforce pages to Communities users, but standard Salesforce pages to all other users, without writing a dozen controller extensions!How to detect button action in controller that is associated with overriden Visualforce page?standard delete button on a custom vf pageOverride Standard View Button and Inline Editing DisabledCan a single VF page override both a standard action and a list action?Issue with StandardController addFields() on WorkOrder sObjectVisualforce - infinite redirection loopStandard controller and extension method with same name

How to obtain a position of last non-zero element

Why are there uneven bright areas in this photo of black hole?

Why couldn't they take pictures of a closer black hole?

How can I define good in a religion that claims no moral authority?

What to do when moving next to a bird sanctuary with a loosely-domesticated cat?

Why don't hard Brexiteers insist on a hard border to prevent illegal immigration after Brexit?

Can withdrawing asylum be illegal?

Flight paths in orbit around Ceres?

Why “相同意思的词” is called “同义词” instead of "同意词"?

Star Trek - X-shaped Item on Regula/Orbital Office Starbases

Compute the product of 3 dictionaries and concatenate keys and values

The phrase "to the numbers born"?

Can a rogue use sneak attack with weapons that have the thrown property even if they are not thrown?

Is bread bad for ducks?

If a sorcerer casts the Banishment spell on a PC while in Avernus, does the PC return to their home plane?

Loose spokes after only a few rides

How to support a colleague who finds meetings extremely tiring?

Why does the nucleus not repel itself?

Falsification in Math vs Science

Correct punctuation for showing a character's confusion

Kerning for subscripts of sigma?

How much of the clove should I use when using big garlic heads?

Worn-tile Scrabble

Inverse Relationship Between Precision and Recall



Get name of standard action overriden in Visualforce contorller



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are Inapex:actionFunction action doesn't seem to work the same as apex:commandButton actionVisualforce page(table) doesn't rerenderShowing visualforce pages to Communities users, but standard Salesforce pages to all other users, without writing a dozen controller extensions!How to detect button action in controller that is associated with overriden Visualforce page?standard delete button on a custom vf pageOverride Standard View Button and Inline Editing DisabledCan a single VF page override both a standard action and a list action?Issue with StandardController addFields() on WorkOrder sObjectVisualforce - infinite redirection loopStandard controller and extension method with same name



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2















I have a visualforce page that overrides both the 'New' and 'Edit' Buttons of a custom object. In my controller extension how can I get the name of the action that called this page ? I don't see anything in the StandardController, there are methods to redirect to the standard edit and view pages but nothing that will return the button clicked.










share|improve this question






























    2















    I have a visualforce page that overrides both the 'New' and 'Edit' Buttons of a custom object. In my controller extension how can I get the name of the action that called this page ? I don't see anything in the StandardController, there are methods to redirect to the standard edit and view pages but nothing that will return the button clicked.










    share|improve this question


























      2












      2








      2








      I have a visualforce page that overrides both the 'New' and 'Edit' Buttons of a custom object. In my controller extension how can I get the name of the action that called this page ? I don't see anything in the StandardController, there are methods to redirect to the standard edit and view pages but nothing that will return the button clicked.










      share|improve this question
















      I have a visualforce page that overrides both the 'New' and 'Edit' Buttons of a custom object. In my controller extension how can I get the name of the action that called this page ? I don't see anything in the StandardController, there are methods to redirect to the standard edit and view pages but nothing that will return the button clicked.







      apex visualforce controller-extension standardcontroller salesforce-classic






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 4 hours ago









      Jayant Das

      18.2k21330




      18.2k21330










      asked 6 hours ago









      SallyRothroatSallyRothroat

      421317




      421317




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          I don't know if there's any standard way to do so, but you can utilize an approach here in your Extension's constructor to identify if the click was from New or Edit.



          When you click on New button, that signifies that you are creating a new record and that it won't have an Id yet, whereas for Edit there will be always one. So checking that in the Extension will help you to identify the flow.



          public class MyExtension 

          private MyObj__c abc;
          private String buttonClicked;

          public MyExtension(ApexPages.StandardController stdController)
          this.abc = (MyObj__c) stdController.getRecord();

          buttonClicked = (abc.Id == null ? 'New' : 'Edit');
          // do something now







          share|improve this answer

























          • +1 Strictly speaking, the parentheses around the ternary expression is not necessary, since there's no ambiguity in the syntax.

            – sfdcfox
            5 hours ago











          • @sfdcfox I agree. I just keep it for a better readability just to not confuse between = and == in the same statement.

            – Jayant Das
            5 hours ago












          • I'll test it out, thanks !

            – SallyRothroat
            4 hours ago











          • I was already getting the record so perfect I'll just check if it's null. What's the abc for?

            – SallyRothroat
            4 hours ago











          • @SallyRothroat Ah, I missed that part. It's just a variable of type of the object which is fetched in the constructor, I have updated my answer. If you are already getting your record, then you just need to verify the Id and done.

            – Jayant Das
            4 hours ago












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "459"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f257521%2fget-name-of-standard-action-overriden-in-visualforce-contorller%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3














          I don't know if there's any standard way to do so, but you can utilize an approach here in your Extension's constructor to identify if the click was from New or Edit.



          When you click on New button, that signifies that you are creating a new record and that it won't have an Id yet, whereas for Edit there will be always one. So checking that in the Extension will help you to identify the flow.



          public class MyExtension 

          private MyObj__c abc;
          private String buttonClicked;

          public MyExtension(ApexPages.StandardController stdController)
          this.abc = (MyObj__c) stdController.getRecord();

          buttonClicked = (abc.Id == null ? 'New' : 'Edit');
          // do something now







          share|improve this answer

























          • +1 Strictly speaking, the parentheses around the ternary expression is not necessary, since there's no ambiguity in the syntax.

            – sfdcfox
            5 hours ago











          • @sfdcfox I agree. I just keep it for a better readability just to not confuse between = and == in the same statement.

            – Jayant Das
            5 hours ago












          • I'll test it out, thanks !

            – SallyRothroat
            4 hours ago











          • I was already getting the record so perfect I'll just check if it's null. What's the abc for?

            – SallyRothroat
            4 hours ago











          • @SallyRothroat Ah, I missed that part. It's just a variable of type of the object which is fetched in the constructor, I have updated my answer. If you are already getting your record, then you just need to verify the Id and done.

            – Jayant Das
            4 hours ago
















          3














          I don't know if there's any standard way to do so, but you can utilize an approach here in your Extension's constructor to identify if the click was from New or Edit.



          When you click on New button, that signifies that you are creating a new record and that it won't have an Id yet, whereas for Edit there will be always one. So checking that in the Extension will help you to identify the flow.



          public class MyExtension 

          private MyObj__c abc;
          private String buttonClicked;

          public MyExtension(ApexPages.StandardController stdController)
          this.abc = (MyObj__c) stdController.getRecord();

          buttonClicked = (abc.Id == null ? 'New' : 'Edit');
          // do something now







          share|improve this answer

























          • +1 Strictly speaking, the parentheses around the ternary expression is not necessary, since there's no ambiguity in the syntax.

            – sfdcfox
            5 hours ago











          • @sfdcfox I agree. I just keep it for a better readability just to not confuse between = and == in the same statement.

            – Jayant Das
            5 hours ago












          • I'll test it out, thanks !

            – SallyRothroat
            4 hours ago











          • I was already getting the record so perfect I'll just check if it's null. What's the abc for?

            – SallyRothroat
            4 hours ago











          • @SallyRothroat Ah, I missed that part. It's just a variable of type of the object which is fetched in the constructor, I have updated my answer. If you are already getting your record, then you just need to verify the Id and done.

            – Jayant Das
            4 hours ago














          3












          3








          3







          I don't know if there's any standard way to do so, but you can utilize an approach here in your Extension's constructor to identify if the click was from New or Edit.



          When you click on New button, that signifies that you are creating a new record and that it won't have an Id yet, whereas for Edit there will be always one. So checking that in the Extension will help you to identify the flow.



          public class MyExtension 

          private MyObj__c abc;
          private String buttonClicked;

          public MyExtension(ApexPages.StandardController stdController)
          this.abc = (MyObj__c) stdController.getRecord();

          buttonClicked = (abc.Id == null ? 'New' : 'Edit');
          // do something now







          share|improve this answer















          I don't know if there's any standard way to do so, but you can utilize an approach here in your Extension's constructor to identify if the click was from New or Edit.



          When you click on New button, that signifies that you are creating a new record and that it won't have an Id yet, whereas for Edit there will be always one. So checking that in the Extension will help you to identify the flow.



          public class MyExtension 

          private MyObj__c abc;
          private String buttonClicked;

          public MyExtension(ApexPages.StandardController stdController)
          this.abc = (MyObj__c) stdController.getRecord();

          buttonClicked = (abc.Id == null ? 'New' : 'Edit');
          // do something now








          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 4 hours ago

























          answered 6 hours ago









          Jayant DasJayant Das

          18.2k21330




          18.2k21330












          • +1 Strictly speaking, the parentheses around the ternary expression is not necessary, since there's no ambiguity in the syntax.

            – sfdcfox
            5 hours ago











          • @sfdcfox I agree. I just keep it for a better readability just to not confuse between = and == in the same statement.

            – Jayant Das
            5 hours ago












          • I'll test it out, thanks !

            – SallyRothroat
            4 hours ago











          • I was already getting the record so perfect I'll just check if it's null. What's the abc for?

            – SallyRothroat
            4 hours ago











          • @SallyRothroat Ah, I missed that part. It's just a variable of type of the object which is fetched in the constructor, I have updated my answer. If you are already getting your record, then you just need to verify the Id and done.

            – Jayant Das
            4 hours ago


















          • +1 Strictly speaking, the parentheses around the ternary expression is not necessary, since there's no ambiguity in the syntax.

            – sfdcfox
            5 hours ago











          • @sfdcfox I agree. I just keep it for a better readability just to not confuse between = and == in the same statement.

            – Jayant Das
            5 hours ago












          • I'll test it out, thanks !

            – SallyRothroat
            4 hours ago











          • I was already getting the record so perfect I'll just check if it's null. What's the abc for?

            – SallyRothroat
            4 hours ago











          • @SallyRothroat Ah, I missed that part. It's just a variable of type of the object which is fetched in the constructor, I have updated my answer. If you are already getting your record, then you just need to verify the Id and done.

            – Jayant Das
            4 hours ago

















          +1 Strictly speaking, the parentheses around the ternary expression is not necessary, since there's no ambiguity in the syntax.

          – sfdcfox
          5 hours ago





          +1 Strictly speaking, the parentheses around the ternary expression is not necessary, since there's no ambiguity in the syntax.

          – sfdcfox
          5 hours ago













          @sfdcfox I agree. I just keep it for a better readability just to not confuse between = and == in the same statement.

          – Jayant Das
          5 hours ago






          @sfdcfox I agree. I just keep it for a better readability just to not confuse between = and == in the same statement.

          – Jayant Das
          5 hours ago














          I'll test it out, thanks !

          – SallyRothroat
          4 hours ago





          I'll test it out, thanks !

          – SallyRothroat
          4 hours ago













          I was already getting the record so perfect I'll just check if it's null. What's the abc for?

          – SallyRothroat
          4 hours ago





          I was already getting the record so perfect I'll just check if it's null. What's the abc for?

          – SallyRothroat
          4 hours ago













          @SallyRothroat Ah, I missed that part. It's just a variable of type of the object which is fetched in the constructor, I have updated my answer. If you are already getting your record, then you just need to verify the Id and done.

          – Jayant Das
          4 hours ago






          @SallyRothroat Ah, I missed that part. It's just a variable of type of the object which is fetched in the constructor, I have updated my answer. If you are already getting your record, then you just need to verify the Id and done.

          – Jayant Das
          4 hours ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Salesforce Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f257521%2fget-name-of-standard-action-overriden-in-visualforce-contorller%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Category:Fedor von Bock Media in category "Fedor von Bock"Navigation menuUpload mediaISNI: 0000 0000 5511 3417VIAF ID: 24712551GND ID: 119294796Library of Congress authority ID: n96068363BnF ID: 12534305fSUDOC authorities ID: 034604189Open Library ID: OL338253ANKCR AUT ID: jn19990000869National Library of Israel ID: 000514068National Thesaurus for Author Names ID: 341574317ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

          Reverse int within the 32-bit signed integer range: [−2^31, 2^31 − 1]Combining two 32-bit integers into one 64-bit integerDetermine if an int is within rangeLossy packing 32 bit integer to 16 bitComputing the square root of a 64-bit integerKeeping integer addition within boundsSafe multiplication of two 64-bit signed integersLeetcode 10: Regular Expression MatchingSigned integer-to-ascii x86_64 assembler macroReverse the digits of an Integer“Add two numbers given in reverse order from a linked list”

          Kiel Indholdsfortegnelse Historie | Transport og færgeforbindelser | Sejlsport og anden sport | Kultur | Kendte personer fra Kiel | Noter | Litteratur | Eksterne henvisninger | Navigationsmenuwww.kiel.de54°19′31″N 10°8′26″Ø / 54.32528°N 10.14056°Ø / 54.32528; 10.14056Oberbürgermeister Dr. Ulf Kämpferwww.statistik-nord.deDen danske Stats StatistikKiels hjemmesiderrrWorldCat312794080n790547494030481-4