Is Social Media Science Fiction?Spiritual elements in a science-fiction novelResearch about science fiction readers?How do I avoid tech/social errors in near-future fiction?Is contributing to “social media” an example of “writing for exposure”?Is there a YouTube for writers? Basically a way to share manuscripts on social mediaWhat makes bad science fiction?Writing an autobiographical science fictionReferencing modern pop culture in science fictionIs time travel science fiction or fantasy?Branding Yourself & Being Social As A Blogger

Where else does the Shulchan Aruch quote an authority by name?

Ideas for 3rd eye abilities

Can the Produce Flame cantrip be used to grapple, or as an unarmed strike, in the right circumstances?

How do I create uniquely male characters?

Landing in very high winds

What is the command to reset a PC without deleting any files

aging parents with no investments

What causes the sudden spool-up sound from an F-16 when enabling afterburner?

Is there a way to make member function NOT callable from constructor?

What are the advantages and disadvantages of running one shots compared to campaigns?

How to move the player while also allowing forces to affect it

Does the average primeness of natural numbers tend to zero?

Landlord wants to switch my lease to a "Land contract" to "get back at the city"

What to wear for invited talk in Canada

A poker game description that does not feel gimmicky

Why is the design of haulage companies so “special”?

What happens when a metallic dragon and a chromatic dragon mate?

Does a dangling wire really electrocute me if I'm standing in water?

Could Giant Ground Sloths have been a good pack animal for the ancient Mayans?

I see my dog run

Is it legal to have the "// (c) 2019 John Smith" header in all files when there are hundreds of contributors?

How to make payment on the internet without leaving a money trail?

Is every set a filtered colimit of finite sets?

Manga about a female worker who got dragged into another world together with this high school girl and she was just told she's not needed anymore



Is Social Media Science Fiction?


Spiritual elements in a science-fiction novelResearch about science fiction readers?How do I avoid tech/social errors in near-future fiction?Is contributing to “social media” an example of “writing for exposure”?Is there a YouTube for writers? Basically a way to share manuscripts on social mediaWhat makes bad science fiction?Writing an autobiographical science fictionReferencing modern pop culture in science fictionIs time travel science fiction or fantasy?Branding Yourself & Being Social As A Blogger













14















I am writing a science fiction story (actually a screenplay for a film, but I imagine that for the purposes of this question the same rules apply) and I have been told that it isn't really science fiction. It's a series of vignettes with an overarching plot about the snowball effect, and is designed to not really have any single antagonist; the primary "vessel" for this is social media and its abuse. All of the social media used does currently exist (it's a film for a school project, so I get fair use). Does this... count as science fiction? If not, why?










share|improve this question







New contributor




user124 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 1





    Hi user124 and welcome to Writing.SE. Amadeus gave you a great answer but we ask here that you wait a full day or two before choosing a best answer. That will encourage others to answer, which is of course what you want. You can choose that accepted answer at any time, there's no time limit. Also, it's not required but if you like, you can choose a name for yourself. You can be anonymous or not, your choice, but you don't have to have user### anymore. Thanks for asking a question!

    – Cyn
    yesterday






  • 2





    it's a film for a school project, so I get fair use – I can only guess that this is about you thinking mentioning existing social media is relevant to copyright or similar. I do not see how this would be the case. If anything, writing about real social media may make you guilty of libel or product placement, but then fair use won’t protect you.

    – Wrzlprmft
    14 hours ago











  • How have you seen other media work with Social Media? I was impressed with how Crazy Ex Girlfriend used it throughout, and that's a contemporary romance.

    – April
    14 hours ago











  • This question, actually, highlights a more generic question: "What differentiates sci-fi and literary fiction?" I have yet to see a comprehensive answer to it anywhere (@Amadeus' answer is getting there, imho). Many other subgenres are traditionally classified as Sci-Fi, like Disaster, Apocalyptic, Alternative History and even Thriller, even though the stories may not feature any non-existing science, finished engineering or supernatural events.

    – Alexander
    11 hours ago















14















I am writing a science fiction story (actually a screenplay for a film, but I imagine that for the purposes of this question the same rules apply) and I have been told that it isn't really science fiction. It's a series of vignettes with an overarching plot about the snowball effect, and is designed to not really have any single antagonist; the primary "vessel" for this is social media and its abuse. All of the social media used does currently exist (it's a film for a school project, so I get fair use). Does this... count as science fiction? If not, why?










share|improve this question







New contributor




user124 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 1





    Hi user124 and welcome to Writing.SE. Amadeus gave you a great answer but we ask here that you wait a full day or two before choosing a best answer. That will encourage others to answer, which is of course what you want. You can choose that accepted answer at any time, there's no time limit. Also, it's not required but if you like, you can choose a name for yourself. You can be anonymous or not, your choice, but you don't have to have user### anymore. Thanks for asking a question!

    – Cyn
    yesterday






  • 2





    it's a film for a school project, so I get fair use – I can only guess that this is about you thinking mentioning existing social media is relevant to copyright or similar. I do not see how this would be the case. If anything, writing about real social media may make you guilty of libel or product placement, but then fair use won’t protect you.

    – Wrzlprmft
    14 hours ago











  • How have you seen other media work with Social Media? I was impressed with how Crazy Ex Girlfriend used it throughout, and that's a contemporary romance.

    – April
    14 hours ago











  • This question, actually, highlights a more generic question: "What differentiates sci-fi and literary fiction?" I have yet to see a comprehensive answer to it anywhere (@Amadeus' answer is getting there, imho). Many other subgenres are traditionally classified as Sci-Fi, like Disaster, Apocalyptic, Alternative History and even Thriller, even though the stories may not feature any non-existing science, finished engineering or supernatural events.

    – Alexander
    11 hours ago













14












14








14


3






I am writing a science fiction story (actually a screenplay for a film, but I imagine that for the purposes of this question the same rules apply) and I have been told that it isn't really science fiction. It's a series of vignettes with an overarching plot about the snowball effect, and is designed to not really have any single antagonist; the primary "vessel" for this is social media and its abuse. All of the social media used does currently exist (it's a film for a school project, so I get fair use). Does this... count as science fiction? If not, why?










share|improve this question







New contributor




user124 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












I am writing a science fiction story (actually a screenplay for a film, but I imagine that for the purposes of this question the same rules apply) and I have been told that it isn't really science fiction. It's a series of vignettes with an overarching plot about the snowball effect, and is designed to not really have any single antagonist; the primary "vessel" for this is social media and its abuse. All of the social media used does currently exist (it's a film for a school project, so I get fair use). Does this... count as science fiction? If not, why?







screenwriting science-fiction social-media






share|improve this question







New contributor




user124 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




user124 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




user124 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









user124user124

7315




7315




New contributor




user124 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





user124 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






user124 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 1





    Hi user124 and welcome to Writing.SE. Amadeus gave you a great answer but we ask here that you wait a full day or two before choosing a best answer. That will encourage others to answer, which is of course what you want. You can choose that accepted answer at any time, there's no time limit. Also, it's not required but if you like, you can choose a name for yourself. You can be anonymous or not, your choice, but you don't have to have user### anymore. Thanks for asking a question!

    – Cyn
    yesterday






  • 2





    it's a film for a school project, so I get fair use – I can only guess that this is about you thinking mentioning existing social media is relevant to copyright or similar. I do not see how this would be the case. If anything, writing about real social media may make you guilty of libel or product placement, but then fair use won’t protect you.

    – Wrzlprmft
    14 hours ago











  • How have you seen other media work with Social Media? I was impressed with how Crazy Ex Girlfriend used it throughout, and that's a contemporary romance.

    – April
    14 hours ago











  • This question, actually, highlights a more generic question: "What differentiates sci-fi and literary fiction?" I have yet to see a comprehensive answer to it anywhere (@Amadeus' answer is getting there, imho). Many other subgenres are traditionally classified as Sci-Fi, like Disaster, Apocalyptic, Alternative History and even Thriller, even though the stories may not feature any non-existing science, finished engineering or supernatural events.

    – Alexander
    11 hours ago












  • 1





    Hi user124 and welcome to Writing.SE. Amadeus gave you a great answer but we ask here that you wait a full day or two before choosing a best answer. That will encourage others to answer, which is of course what you want. You can choose that accepted answer at any time, there's no time limit. Also, it's not required but if you like, you can choose a name for yourself. You can be anonymous or not, your choice, but you don't have to have user### anymore. Thanks for asking a question!

    – Cyn
    yesterday






  • 2





    it's a film for a school project, so I get fair use – I can only guess that this is about you thinking mentioning existing social media is relevant to copyright or similar. I do not see how this would be the case. If anything, writing about real social media may make you guilty of libel or product placement, but then fair use won’t protect you.

    – Wrzlprmft
    14 hours ago











  • How have you seen other media work with Social Media? I was impressed with how Crazy Ex Girlfriend used it throughout, and that's a contemporary romance.

    – April
    14 hours ago











  • This question, actually, highlights a more generic question: "What differentiates sci-fi and literary fiction?" I have yet to see a comprehensive answer to it anywhere (@Amadeus' answer is getting there, imho). Many other subgenres are traditionally classified as Sci-Fi, like Disaster, Apocalyptic, Alternative History and even Thriller, even though the stories may not feature any non-existing science, finished engineering or supernatural events.

    – Alexander
    11 hours ago







1




1





Hi user124 and welcome to Writing.SE. Amadeus gave you a great answer but we ask here that you wait a full day or two before choosing a best answer. That will encourage others to answer, which is of course what you want. You can choose that accepted answer at any time, there's no time limit. Also, it's not required but if you like, you can choose a name for yourself. You can be anonymous or not, your choice, but you don't have to have user### anymore. Thanks for asking a question!

– Cyn
yesterday





Hi user124 and welcome to Writing.SE. Amadeus gave you a great answer but we ask here that you wait a full day or two before choosing a best answer. That will encourage others to answer, which is of course what you want. You can choose that accepted answer at any time, there's no time limit. Also, it's not required but if you like, you can choose a name for yourself. You can be anonymous or not, your choice, but you don't have to have user### anymore. Thanks for asking a question!

– Cyn
yesterday




2




2





it's a film for a school project, so I get fair use – I can only guess that this is about you thinking mentioning existing social media is relevant to copyright or similar. I do not see how this would be the case. If anything, writing about real social media may make you guilty of libel or product placement, but then fair use won’t protect you.

– Wrzlprmft
14 hours ago





it's a film for a school project, so I get fair use – I can only guess that this is about you thinking mentioning existing social media is relevant to copyright or similar. I do not see how this would be the case. If anything, writing about real social media may make you guilty of libel or product placement, but then fair use won’t protect you.

– Wrzlprmft
14 hours ago













How have you seen other media work with Social Media? I was impressed with how Crazy Ex Girlfriend used it throughout, and that's a contemporary romance.

– April
14 hours ago





How have you seen other media work with Social Media? I was impressed with how Crazy Ex Girlfriend used it throughout, and that's a contemporary romance.

– April
14 hours ago













This question, actually, highlights a more generic question: "What differentiates sci-fi and literary fiction?" I have yet to see a comprehensive answer to it anywhere (@Amadeus' answer is getting there, imho). Many other subgenres are traditionally classified as Sci-Fi, like Disaster, Apocalyptic, Alternative History and even Thriller, even though the stories may not feature any non-existing science, finished engineering or supernatural events.

– Alexander
11 hours ago





This question, actually, highlights a more generic question: "What differentiates sci-fi and literary fiction?" I have yet to see a comprehensive answer to it anywhere (@Amadeus' answer is getting there, imho). Many other subgenres are traditionally classified as Sci-Fi, like Disaster, Apocalyptic, Alternative History and even Thriller, even though the stories may not feature any non-existing science, finished engineering or supernatural events.

– Alexander
11 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















25














It isn't science fiction, it is just Contemporary fiction, aka Realistic fiction.



A Science Fiction story must rely heavily on some non-existing tech or some reasonably plausible guess at a futuristic development; like being visited by aliens, or discovering them.



In some scenarios (about the future, or space operas, etc) there is a lot of this; in others it can be just one thing; e.g. a time-travel story may have only one piece of non-existing tech (the time machine).



The NEW tech (or discovery) must be central to the story line and what happens, e.g. in Star Wars, FTL space travel, light sabers, sentient robots and sentient aliens are all central to the plot. In Men In Black, only a little new tech is important, but aliens are central to the plot.



It isn't "science fiction" if it is about science but the science employed is not fictional; it is what we already know, you offer no surprises or eye-opening innovations on the tech front, or about the future.






share|improve this answer


















  • 10





    Note though that "near future" science fiction does exist. The concepts may already be here, and even the basic technologies - the novel simply takes it to one plausible conclusion. "Interface" by Neal Stephenson is a good example.

    – Graham
    yesterday






  • 3





    @Graham Sure. But "taking it to one plausible conclusion" is the key. I think, if I set a novel ten years from now, but the story wasn't about some new tech and instead was just a love story with faster iPhones and self-driving taxis, I shouldn't call it SciFi; because it would be panned as boring by somebody looking for "fiction about new scientific developments".

    – Amadeus
    17 hours ago






  • 3





    @Graham Even "near future" science fiction is expected to discuss some future development which might be conceivably just around the corner but which is not reality yet. Social media hate mobs destroying people's lifes for no good reason is nothing new. We already have that for several years. It would only be SF if some technological or social development would make this problem a lot worse than it already is.

    – Philipp
    15 hours ago







  • 3





    A good example I can think of for Sci-fi that does use near future aspects (and significantly social media in many of the stories) would be Black Mirror. Many of the episodes take place in what is essentially our time and our technology, with a few differences that usually set the theme for the episode.

    – JMac
    13 hours ago






  • 1





    @Amadeus Don't forget that Star Wars is not sci-fi, by the definitions of sci-fi. It's space opera, which is to say it's straight-up fantasy with futuristic decorations. Not only could it have been done as straight fantasy - it has been, many times over. And not only that, Lucas is perfectly upfront about which fantasy sources he took all his various elements from. R2D2 and C3PO, for instance, are direct copies of characters from The Hidden Fortress.

    – Graham
    6 hours ago



















14














Social media is no longer sci-fi



In years gone past concepts like the internet would be considered sci-fi. Many book exist which use digital communication on a global scale as part of a sci-fi setting. Oxford Living Dictionary defines science fiction as:




fiction based on imagined future scientific or technological advances and major social or environmental changes, frequently portraying space or time travel and life on other planets.




20, 10 or, to some degree, even 5 years ago it would have been difficult to imagine a single network or service having as much control over our lives as facebook does today. A setting that used such a network would have been considered sci-fi or at least dystopian as little as 5 years ago, but wouldn't be today.



For example consider the novels Feed (2002) and The Circle (2013) both books deal with an overarching network connection with control over our daily life, set in the not too distant future. Feed is a distinctly sci-fi novel, written when the internet was still relatively new and the idea of a network like that is a major technological advance and social change. The Circle is slightly less sci-fi and more dystopian or alternate reality as the technology and social structure are less distant from reality at the time of writing.



Move forward another 6 years to today. The concept of a social network is not longer futuristic and required no technological advances or social change. They already exist and writing on them would be more closely considered social commentary than alternate reality.



In conclusion; it would have been sci-fi if you wrote it 10 years ago. Today it is just fiction.






share|improve this answer

























  • Not even just fiction, such a story today would almost certainly stand as social commentary — a genre rife with potential of its own, in the right author's hands. Though, of course, any such story is practically destined to be very much "of the moment". Whereas one of the best things about really great sci-fi is the timelessness it can achieve, remaining relevant and interesting even long after "real world" technology has surpassed its fiction!

    – FeRD
    13 hours ago






  • 1





    @FeRD Agreed, i mention that in my second last paragraph. It just didn't make as snappy a closing.

    – linksassin
    2 hours ago











  • So you did! My apologies, I get a D- in reading comprehension.

    – FeRD
    2 hours ago


















2














I wouldn't really consider a story science fiction if the science and technology in the story exists entirely within the confines of reality today. For it to count, some aspect of the technology in the story would need to be more advanced or significantly different compared to what currently exists today.



Tom Scott actually has a lot of videos outlining sci-fi-themed hypothetical scenarios relating to social media and the internet, so here are some examples, along with my view on whether they seem like science fiction:



Doesn't feel like science fiction (rather, just fiction):




  • Single Point of Failure: The (Fictional) Day Google Forgot To Check Passwords: Entirely plausible in the modern-day world.


  • Flash Mob Gone Wrong by Tom Scott: "Any similarity to actual events or people is purely coincidental", but it's entirely plausible within the confines of modern-day technology and social structures.

Feels like science fiction:




  • The Bubble: imagine the web without trolls, or shocks, or spam: The technology needed to implement this as described is still beyond us :)


  • Oversight: Thank you for volunteering, citizen. Feels like 1984 (social science fiction). The system and social structure described in this video has some sci-fi vibes.


  • The Artificial Intelligence That Deleted A Century: The motivations behind Earworm are scarily plausible but fortunately the technological level of the system is still quite a ways beyond us at the moment. Mesh network of mites (shivers).





share|improve this answer

























  • I would also include the Earworm video in this list

    – Dmitry Kudriavtsev
    4 hours ago











  • @Dmitry Kudriavtsev oh right, that one was good.

    – ahiijny
    59 mins ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "166"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






user124 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f44456%2fis-social-media-science-fiction%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









25














It isn't science fiction, it is just Contemporary fiction, aka Realistic fiction.



A Science Fiction story must rely heavily on some non-existing tech or some reasonably plausible guess at a futuristic development; like being visited by aliens, or discovering them.



In some scenarios (about the future, or space operas, etc) there is a lot of this; in others it can be just one thing; e.g. a time-travel story may have only one piece of non-existing tech (the time machine).



The NEW tech (or discovery) must be central to the story line and what happens, e.g. in Star Wars, FTL space travel, light sabers, sentient robots and sentient aliens are all central to the plot. In Men In Black, only a little new tech is important, but aliens are central to the plot.



It isn't "science fiction" if it is about science but the science employed is not fictional; it is what we already know, you offer no surprises or eye-opening innovations on the tech front, or about the future.






share|improve this answer


















  • 10





    Note though that "near future" science fiction does exist. The concepts may already be here, and even the basic technologies - the novel simply takes it to one plausible conclusion. "Interface" by Neal Stephenson is a good example.

    – Graham
    yesterday






  • 3





    @Graham Sure. But "taking it to one plausible conclusion" is the key. I think, if I set a novel ten years from now, but the story wasn't about some new tech and instead was just a love story with faster iPhones and self-driving taxis, I shouldn't call it SciFi; because it would be panned as boring by somebody looking for "fiction about new scientific developments".

    – Amadeus
    17 hours ago






  • 3





    @Graham Even "near future" science fiction is expected to discuss some future development which might be conceivably just around the corner but which is not reality yet. Social media hate mobs destroying people's lifes for no good reason is nothing new. We already have that for several years. It would only be SF if some technological or social development would make this problem a lot worse than it already is.

    – Philipp
    15 hours ago







  • 3





    A good example I can think of for Sci-fi that does use near future aspects (and significantly social media in many of the stories) would be Black Mirror. Many of the episodes take place in what is essentially our time and our technology, with a few differences that usually set the theme for the episode.

    – JMac
    13 hours ago






  • 1





    @Amadeus Don't forget that Star Wars is not sci-fi, by the definitions of sci-fi. It's space opera, which is to say it's straight-up fantasy with futuristic decorations. Not only could it have been done as straight fantasy - it has been, many times over. And not only that, Lucas is perfectly upfront about which fantasy sources he took all his various elements from. R2D2 and C3PO, for instance, are direct copies of characters from The Hidden Fortress.

    – Graham
    6 hours ago
















25














It isn't science fiction, it is just Contemporary fiction, aka Realistic fiction.



A Science Fiction story must rely heavily on some non-existing tech or some reasonably plausible guess at a futuristic development; like being visited by aliens, or discovering them.



In some scenarios (about the future, or space operas, etc) there is a lot of this; in others it can be just one thing; e.g. a time-travel story may have only one piece of non-existing tech (the time machine).



The NEW tech (or discovery) must be central to the story line and what happens, e.g. in Star Wars, FTL space travel, light sabers, sentient robots and sentient aliens are all central to the plot. In Men In Black, only a little new tech is important, but aliens are central to the plot.



It isn't "science fiction" if it is about science but the science employed is not fictional; it is what we already know, you offer no surprises or eye-opening innovations on the tech front, or about the future.






share|improve this answer


















  • 10





    Note though that "near future" science fiction does exist. The concepts may already be here, and even the basic technologies - the novel simply takes it to one plausible conclusion. "Interface" by Neal Stephenson is a good example.

    – Graham
    yesterday






  • 3





    @Graham Sure. But "taking it to one plausible conclusion" is the key. I think, if I set a novel ten years from now, but the story wasn't about some new tech and instead was just a love story with faster iPhones and self-driving taxis, I shouldn't call it SciFi; because it would be panned as boring by somebody looking for "fiction about new scientific developments".

    – Amadeus
    17 hours ago






  • 3





    @Graham Even "near future" science fiction is expected to discuss some future development which might be conceivably just around the corner but which is not reality yet. Social media hate mobs destroying people's lifes for no good reason is nothing new. We already have that for several years. It would only be SF if some technological or social development would make this problem a lot worse than it already is.

    – Philipp
    15 hours ago







  • 3





    A good example I can think of for Sci-fi that does use near future aspects (and significantly social media in many of the stories) would be Black Mirror. Many of the episodes take place in what is essentially our time and our technology, with a few differences that usually set the theme for the episode.

    – JMac
    13 hours ago






  • 1





    @Amadeus Don't forget that Star Wars is not sci-fi, by the definitions of sci-fi. It's space opera, which is to say it's straight-up fantasy with futuristic decorations. Not only could it have been done as straight fantasy - it has been, many times over. And not only that, Lucas is perfectly upfront about which fantasy sources he took all his various elements from. R2D2 and C3PO, for instance, are direct copies of characters from The Hidden Fortress.

    – Graham
    6 hours ago














25












25








25







It isn't science fiction, it is just Contemporary fiction, aka Realistic fiction.



A Science Fiction story must rely heavily on some non-existing tech or some reasonably plausible guess at a futuristic development; like being visited by aliens, or discovering them.



In some scenarios (about the future, or space operas, etc) there is a lot of this; in others it can be just one thing; e.g. a time-travel story may have only one piece of non-existing tech (the time machine).



The NEW tech (or discovery) must be central to the story line and what happens, e.g. in Star Wars, FTL space travel, light sabers, sentient robots and sentient aliens are all central to the plot. In Men In Black, only a little new tech is important, but aliens are central to the plot.



It isn't "science fiction" if it is about science but the science employed is not fictional; it is what we already know, you offer no surprises or eye-opening innovations on the tech front, or about the future.






share|improve this answer













It isn't science fiction, it is just Contemporary fiction, aka Realistic fiction.



A Science Fiction story must rely heavily on some non-existing tech or some reasonably plausible guess at a futuristic development; like being visited by aliens, or discovering them.



In some scenarios (about the future, or space operas, etc) there is a lot of this; in others it can be just one thing; e.g. a time-travel story may have only one piece of non-existing tech (the time machine).



The NEW tech (or discovery) must be central to the story line and what happens, e.g. in Star Wars, FTL space travel, light sabers, sentient robots and sentient aliens are all central to the plot. In Men In Black, only a little new tech is important, but aliens are central to the plot.



It isn't "science fiction" if it is about science but the science employed is not fictional; it is what we already know, you offer no surprises or eye-opening innovations on the tech front, or about the future.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered yesterday









AmadeusAmadeus

58.4k676187




58.4k676187







  • 10





    Note though that "near future" science fiction does exist. The concepts may already be here, and even the basic technologies - the novel simply takes it to one plausible conclusion. "Interface" by Neal Stephenson is a good example.

    – Graham
    yesterday






  • 3





    @Graham Sure. But "taking it to one plausible conclusion" is the key. I think, if I set a novel ten years from now, but the story wasn't about some new tech and instead was just a love story with faster iPhones and self-driving taxis, I shouldn't call it SciFi; because it would be panned as boring by somebody looking for "fiction about new scientific developments".

    – Amadeus
    17 hours ago






  • 3





    @Graham Even "near future" science fiction is expected to discuss some future development which might be conceivably just around the corner but which is not reality yet. Social media hate mobs destroying people's lifes for no good reason is nothing new. We already have that for several years. It would only be SF if some technological or social development would make this problem a lot worse than it already is.

    – Philipp
    15 hours ago







  • 3





    A good example I can think of for Sci-fi that does use near future aspects (and significantly social media in many of the stories) would be Black Mirror. Many of the episodes take place in what is essentially our time and our technology, with a few differences that usually set the theme for the episode.

    – JMac
    13 hours ago






  • 1





    @Amadeus Don't forget that Star Wars is not sci-fi, by the definitions of sci-fi. It's space opera, which is to say it's straight-up fantasy with futuristic decorations. Not only could it have been done as straight fantasy - it has been, many times over. And not only that, Lucas is perfectly upfront about which fantasy sources he took all his various elements from. R2D2 and C3PO, for instance, are direct copies of characters from The Hidden Fortress.

    – Graham
    6 hours ago













  • 10





    Note though that "near future" science fiction does exist. The concepts may already be here, and even the basic technologies - the novel simply takes it to one plausible conclusion. "Interface" by Neal Stephenson is a good example.

    – Graham
    yesterday






  • 3





    @Graham Sure. But "taking it to one plausible conclusion" is the key. I think, if I set a novel ten years from now, but the story wasn't about some new tech and instead was just a love story with faster iPhones and self-driving taxis, I shouldn't call it SciFi; because it would be panned as boring by somebody looking for "fiction about new scientific developments".

    – Amadeus
    17 hours ago






  • 3





    @Graham Even "near future" science fiction is expected to discuss some future development which might be conceivably just around the corner but which is not reality yet. Social media hate mobs destroying people's lifes for no good reason is nothing new. We already have that for several years. It would only be SF if some technological or social development would make this problem a lot worse than it already is.

    – Philipp
    15 hours ago







  • 3





    A good example I can think of for Sci-fi that does use near future aspects (and significantly social media in many of the stories) would be Black Mirror. Many of the episodes take place in what is essentially our time and our technology, with a few differences that usually set the theme for the episode.

    – JMac
    13 hours ago






  • 1





    @Amadeus Don't forget that Star Wars is not sci-fi, by the definitions of sci-fi. It's space opera, which is to say it's straight-up fantasy with futuristic decorations. Not only could it have been done as straight fantasy - it has been, many times over. And not only that, Lucas is perfectly upfront about which fantasy sources he took all his various elements from. R2D2 and C3PO, for instance, are direct copies of characters from The Hidden Fortress.

    – Graham
    6 hours ago








10




10





Note though that "near future" science fiction does exist. The concepts may already be here, and even the basic technologies - the novel simply takes it to one plausible conclusion. "Interface" by Neal Stephenson is a good example.

– Graham
yesterday





Note though that "near future" science fiction does exist. The concepts may already be here, and even the basic technologies - the novel simply takes it to one plausible conclusion. "Interface" by Neal Stephenson is a good example.

– Graham
yesterday




3




3





@Graham Sure. But "taking it to one plausible conclusion" is the key. I think, if I set a novel ten years from now, but the story wasn't about some new tech and instead was just a love story with faster iPhones and self-driving taxis, I shouldn't call it SciFi; because it would be panned as boring by somebody looking for "fiction about new scientific developments".

– Amadeus
17 hours ago





@Graham Sure. But "taking it to one plausible conclusion" is the key. I think, if I set a novel ten years from now, but the story wasn't about some new tech and instead was just a love story with faster iPhones and self-driving taxis, I shouldn't call it SciFi; because it would be panned as boring by somebody looking for "fiction about new scientific developments".

– Amadeus
17 hours ago




3




3





@Graham Even "near future" science fiction is expected to discuss some future development which might be conceivably just around the corner but which is not reality yet. Social media hate mobs destroying people's lifes for no good reason is nothing new. We already have that for several years. It would only be SF if some technological or social development would make this problem a lot worse than it already is.

– Philipp
15 hours ago






@Graham Even "near future" science fiction is expected to discuss some future development which might be conceivably just around the corner but which is not reality yet. Social media hate mobs destroying people's lifes for no good reason is nothing new. We already have that for several years. It would only be SF if some technological or social development would make this problem a lot worse than it already is.

– Philipp
15 hours ago





3




3





A good example I can think of for Sci-fi that does use near future aspects (and significantly social media in many of the stories) would be Black Mirror. Many of the episodes take place in what is essentially our time and our technology, with a few differences that usually set the theme for the episode.

– JMac
13 hours ago





A good example I can think of for Sci-fi that does use near future aspects (and significantly social media in many of the stories) would be Black Mirror. Many of the episodes take place in what is essentially our time and our technology, with a few differences that usually set the theme for the episode.

– JMac
13 hours ago




1




1





@Amadeus Don't forget that Star Wars is not sci-fi, by the definitions of sci-fi. It's space opera, which is to say it's straight-up fantasy with futuristic decorations. Not only could it have been done as straight fantasy - it has been, many times over. And not only that, Lucas is perfectly upfront about which fantasy sources he took all his various elements from. R2D2 and C3PO, for instance, are direct copies of characters from The Hidden Fortress.

– Graham
6 hours ago






@Amadeus Don't forget that Star Wars is not sci-fi, by the definitions of sci-fi. It's space opera, which is to say it's straight-up fantasy with futuristic decorations. Not only could it have been done as straight fantasy - it has been, many times over. And not only that, Lucas is perfectly upfront about which fantasy sources he took all his various elements from. R2D2 and C3PO, for instance, are direct copies of characters from The Hidden Fortress.

– Graham
6 hours ago












14














Social media is no longer sci-fi



In years gone past concepts like the internet would be considered sci-fi. Many book exist which use digital communication on a global scale as part of a sci-fi setting. Oxford Living Dictionary defines science fiction as:




fiction based on imagined future scientific or technological advances and major social or environmental changes, frequently portraying space or time travel and life on other planets.




20, 10 or, to some degree, even 5 years ago it would have been difficult to imagine a single network or service having as much control over our lives as facebook does today. A setting that used such a network would have been considered sci-fi or at least dystopian as little as 5 years ago, but wouldn't be today.



For example consider the novels Feed (2002) and The Circle (2013) both books deal with an overarching network connection with control over our daily life, set in the not too distant future. Feed is a distinctly sci-fi novel, written when the internet was still relatively new and the idea of a network like that is a major technological advance and social change. The Circle is slightly less sci-fi and more dystopian or alternate reality as the technology and social structure are less distant from reality at the time of writing.



Move forward another 6 years to today. The concept of a social network is not longer futuristic and required no technological advances or social change. They already exist and writing on them would be more closely considered social commentary than alternate reality.



In conclusion; it would have been sci-fi if you wrote it 10 years ago. Today it is just fiction.






share|improve this answer

























  • Not even just fiction, such a story today would almost certainly stand as social commentary — a genre rife with potential of its own, in the right author's hands. Though, of course, any such story is practically destined to be very much "of the moment". Whereas one of the best things about really great sci-fi is the timelessness it can achieve, remaining relevant and interesting even long after "real world" technology has surpassed its fiction!

    – FeRD
    13 hours ago






  • 1





    @FeRD Agreed, i mention that in my second last paragraph. It just didn't make as snappy a closing.

    – linksassin
    2 hours ago











  • So you did! My apologies, I get a D- in reading comprehension.

    – FeRD
    2 hours ago















14














Social media is no longer sci-fi



In years gone past concepts like the internet would be considered sci-fi. Many book exist which use digital communication on a global scale as part of a sci-fi setting. Oxford Living Dictionary defines science fiction as:




fiction based on imagined future scientific or technological advances and major social or environmental changes, frequently portraying space or time travel and life on other planets.




20, 10 or, to some degree, even 5 years ago it would have been difficult to imagine a single network or service having as much control over our lives as facebook does today. A setting that used such a network would have been considered sci-fi or at least dystopian as little as 5 years ago, but wouldn't be today.



For example consider the novels Feed (2002) and The Circle (2013) both books deal with an overarching network connection with control over our daily life, set in the not too distant future. Feed is a distinctly sci-fi novel, written when the internet was still relatively new and the idea of a network like that is a major technological advance and social change. The Circle is slightly less sci-fi and more dystopian or alternate reality as the technology and social structure are less distant from reality at the time of writing.



Move forward another 6 years to today. The concept of a social network is not longer futuristic and required no technological advances or social change. They already exist and writing on them would be more closely considered social commentary than alternate reality.



In conclusion; it would have been sci-fi if you wrote it 10 years ago. Today it is just fiction.






share|improve this answer

























  • Not even just fiction, such a story today would almost certainly stand as social commentary — a genre rife with potential of its own, in the right author's hands. Though, of course, any such story is practically destined to be very much "of the moment". Whereas one of the best things about really great sci-fi is the timelessness it can achieve, remaining relevant and interesting even long after "real world" technology has surpassed its fiction!

    – FeRD
    13 hours ago






  • 1





    @FeRD Agreed, i mention that in my second last paragraph. It just didn't make as snappy a closing.

    – linksassin
    2 hours ago











  • So you did! My apologies, I get a D- in reading comprehension.

    – FeRD
    2 hours ago













14












14








14







Social media is no longer sci-fi



In years gone past concepts like the internet would be considered sci-fi. Many book exist which use digital communication on a global scale as part of a sci-fi setting. Oxford Living Dictionary defines science fiction as:




fiction based on imagined future scientific or technological advances and major social or environmental changes, frequently portraying space or time travel and life on other planets.




20, 10 or, to some degree, even 5 years ago it would have been difficult to imagine a single network or service having as much control over our lives as facebook does today. A setting that used such a network would have been considered sci-fi or at least dystopian as little as 5 years ago, but wouldn't be today.



For example consider the novels Feed (2002) and The Circle (2013) both books deal with an overarching network connection with control over our daily life, set in the not too distant future. Feed is a distinctly sci-fi novel, written when the internet was still relatively new and the idea of a network like that is a major technological advance and social change. The Circle is slightly less sci-fi and more dystopian or alternate reality as the technology and social structure are less distant from reality at the time of writing.



Move forward another 6 years to today. The concept of a social network is not longer futuristic and required no technological advances or social change. They already exist and writing on them would be more closely considered social commentary than alternate reality.



In conclusion; it would have been sci-fi if you wrote it 10 years ago. Today it is just fiction.






share|improve this answer















Social media is no longer sci-fi



In years gone past concepts like the internet would be considered sci-fi. Many book exist which use digital communication on a global scale as part of a sci-fi setting. Oxford Living Dictionary defines science fiction as:




fiction based on imagined future scientific or technological advances and major social or environmental changes, frequently portraying space or time travel and life on other planets.




20, 10 or, to some degree, even 5 years ago it would have been difficult to imagine a single network or service having as much control over our lives as facebook does today. A setting that used such a network would have been considered sci-fi or at least dystopian as little as 5 years ago, but wouldn't be today.



For example consider the novels Feed (2002) and The Circle (2013) both books deal with an overarching network connection with control over our daily life, set in the not too distant future. Feed is a distinctly sci-fi novel, written when the internet was still relatively new and the idea of a network like that is a major technological advance and social change. The Circle is slightly less sci-fi and more dystopian or alternate reality as the technology and social structure are less distant from reality at the time of writing.



Move forward another 6 years to today. The concept of a social network is not longer futuristic and required no technological advances or social change. They already exist and writing on them would be more closely considered social commentary than alternate reality.



In conclusion; it would have been sci-fi if you wrote it 10 years ago. Today it is just fiction.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 12 hours ago









JJJ

1033




1033










answered yesterday









linksassinlinksassin

2,364934




2,364934












  • Not even just fiction, such a story today would almost certainly stand as social commentary — a genre rife with potential of its own, in the right author's hands. Though, of course, any such story is practically destined to be very much "of the moment". Whereas one of the best things about really great sci-fi is the timelessness it can achieve, remaining relevant and interesting even long after "real world" technology has surpassed its fiction!

    – FeRD
    13 hours ago






  • 1





    @FeRD Agreed, i mention that in my second last paragraph. It just didn't make as snappy a closing.

    – linksassin
    2 hours ago











  • So you did! My apologies, I get a D- in reading comprehension.

    – FeRD
    2 hours ago

















  • Not even just fiction, such a story today would almost certainly stand as social commentary — a genre rife with potential of its own, in the right author's hands. Though, of course, any such story is practically destined to be very much "of the moment". Whereas one of the best things about really great sci-fi is the timelessness it can achieve, remaining relevant and interesting even long after "real world" technology has surpassed its fiction!

    – FeRD
    13 hours ago






  • 1





    @FeRD Agreed, i mention that in my second last paragraph. It just didn't make as snappy a closing.

    – linksassin
    2 hours ago











  • So you did! My apologies, I get a D- in reading comprehension.

    – FeRD
    2 hours ago
















Not even just fiction, such a story today would almost certainly stand as social commentary — a genre rife with potential of its own, in the right author's hands. Though, of course, any such story is practically destined to be very much "of the moment". Whereas one of the best things about really great sci-fi is the timelessness it can achieve, remaining relevant and interesting even long after "real world" technology has surpassed its fiction!

– FeRD
13 hours ago





Not even just fiction, such a story today would almost certainly stand as social commentary — a genre rife with potential of its own, in the right author's hands. Though, of course, any such story is practically destined to be very much "of the moment". Whereas one of the best things about really great sci-fi is the timelessness it can achieve, remaining relevant and interesting even long after "real world" technology has surpassed its fiction!

– FeRD
13 hours ago




1




1





@FeRD Agreed, i mention that in my second last paragraph. It just didn't make as snappy a closing.

– linksassin
2 hours ago





@FeRD Agreed, i mention that in my second last paragraph. It just didn't make as snappy a closing.

– linksassin
2 hours ago













So you did! My apologies, I get a D- in reading comprehension.

– FeRD
2 hours ago





So you did! My apologies, I get a D- in reading comprehension.

– FeRD
2 hours ago











2














I wouldn't really consider a story science fiction if the science and technology in the story exists entirely within the confines of reality today. For it to count, some aspect of the technology in the story would need to be more advanced or significantly different compared to what currently exists today.



Tom Scott actually has a lot of videos outlining sci-fi-themed hypothetical scenarios relating to social media and the internet, so here are some examples, along with my view on whether they seem like science fiction:



Doesn't feel like science fiction (rather, just fiction):




  • Single Point of Failure: The (Fictional) Day Google Forgot To Check Passwords: Entirely plausible in the modern-day world.


  • Flash Mob Gone Wrong by Tom Scott: "Any similarity to actual events or people is purely coincidental", but it's entirely plausible within the confines of modern-day technology and social structures.

Feels like science fiction:




  • The Bubble: imagine the web without trolls, or shocks, or spam: The technology needed to implement this as described is still beyond us :)


  • Oversight: Thank you for volunteering, citizen. Feels like 1984 (social science fiction). The system and social structure described in this video has some sci-fi vibes.


  • The Artificial Intelligence That Deleted A Century: The motivations behind Earworm are scarily plausible but fortunately the technological level of the system is still quite a ways beyond us at the moment. Mesh network of mites (shivers).





share|improve this answer

























  • I would also include the Earworm video in this list

    – Dmitry Kudriavtsev
    4 hours ago











  • @Dmitry Kudriavtsev oh right, that one was good.

    – ahiijny
    59 mins ago















2














I wouldn't really consider a story science fiction if the science and technology in the story exists entirely within the confines of reality today. For it to count, some aspect of the technology in the story would need to be more advanced or significantly different compared to what currently exists today.



Tom Scott actually has a lot of videos outlining sci-fi-themed hypothetical scenarios relating to social media and the internet, so here are some examples, along with my view on whether they seem like science fiction:



Doesn't feel like science fiction (rather, just fiction):




  • Single Point of Failure: The (Fictional) Day Google Forgot To Check Passwords: Entirely plausible in the modern-day world.


  • Flash Mob Gone Wrong by Tom Scott: "Any similarity to actual events or people is purely coincidental", but it's entirely plausible within the confines of modern-day technology and social structures.

Feels like science fiction:




  • The Bubble: imagine the web without trolls, or shocks, or spam: The technology needed to implement this as described is still beyond us :)


  • Oversight: Thank you for volunteering, citizen. Feels like 1984 (social science fiction). The system and social structure described in this video has some sci-fi vibes.


  • The Artificial Intelligence That Deleted A Century: The motivations behind Earworm are scarily plausible but fortunately the technological level of the system is still quite a ways beyond us at the moment. Mesh network of mites (shivers).





share|improve this answer

























  • I would also include the Earworm video in this list

    – Dmitry Kudriavtsev
    4 hours ago











  • @Dmitry Kudriavtsev oh right, that one was good.

    – ahiijny
    59 mins ago













2












2








2







I wouldn't really consider a story science fiction if the science and technology in the story exists entirely within the confines of reality today. For it to count, some aspect of the technology in the story would need to be more advanced or significantly different compared to what currently exists today.



Tom Scott actually has a lot of videos outlining sci-fi-themed hypothetical scenarios relating to social media and the internet, so here are some examples, along with my view on whether they seem like science fiction:



Doesn't feel like science fiction (rather, just fiction):




  • Single Point of Failure: The (Fictional) Day Google Forgot To Check Passwords: Entirely plausible in the modern-day world.


  • Flash Mob Gone Wrong by Tom Scott: "Any similarity to actual events or people is purely coincidental", but it's entirely plausible within the confines of modern-day technology and social structures.

Feels like science fiction:




  • The Bubble: imagine the web without trolls, or shocks, or spam: The technology needed to implement this as described is still beyond us :)


  • Oversight: Thank you for volunteering, citizen. Feels like 1984 (social science fiction). The system and social structure described in this video has some sci-fi vibes.


  • The Artificial Intelligence That Deleted A Century: The motivations behind Earworm are scarily plausible but fortunately the technological level of the system is still quite a ways beyond us at the moment. Mesh network of mites (shivers).





share|improve this answer















I wouldn't really consider a story science fiction if the science and technology in the story exists entirely within the confines of reality today. For it to count, some aspect of the technology in the story would need to be more advanced or significantly different compared to what currently exists today.



Tom Scott actually has a lot of videos outlining sci-fi-themed hypothetical scenarios relating to social media and the internet, so here are some examples, along with my view on whether they seem like science fiction:



Doesn't feel like science fiction (rather, just fiction):




  • Single Point of Failure: The (Fictional) Day Google Forgot To Check Passwords: Entirely plausible in the modern-day world.


  • Flash Mob Gone Wrong by Tom Scott: "Any similarity to actual events or people is purely coincidental", but it's entirely plausible within the confines of modern-day technology and social structures.

Feels like science fiction:




  • The Bubble: imagine the web without trolls, or shocks, or spam: The technology needed to implement this as described is still beyond us :)


  • Oversight: Thank you for volunteering, citizen. Feels like 1984 (social science fiction). The system and social structure described in this video has some sci-fi vibes.


  • The Artificial Intelligence That Deleted A Century: The motivations behind Earworm are scarily plausible but fortunately the technological level of the system is still quite a ways beyond us at the moment. Mesh network of mites (shivers).






share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 1 hour ago

























answered 23 hours ago









ahiijnyahiijny

23316




23316












  • I would also include the Earworm video in this list

    – Dmitry Kudriavtsev
    4 hours ago











  • @Dmitry Kudriavtsev oh right, that one was good.

    – ahiijny
    59 mins ago

















  • I would also include the Earworm video in this list

    – Dmitry Kudriavtsev
    4 hours ago











  • @Dmitry Kudriavtsev oh right, that one was good.

    – ahiijny
    59 mins ago
















I would also include the Earworm video in this list

– Dmitry Kudriavtsev
4 hours ago





I would also include the Earworm video in this list

– Dmitry Kudriavtsev
4 hours ago













@Dmitry Kudriavtsev oh right, that one was good.

– ahiijny
59 mins ago





@Dmitry Kudriavtsev oh right, that one was good.

– ahiijny
59 mins ago










user124 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















user124 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












user124 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











user124 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














Thanks for contributing an answer to Writing Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f44456%2fis-social-media-science-fiction%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Reverse int within the 32-bit signed integer range: [−2^31, 2^31 − 1]Combining two 32-bit integers into one 64-bit integerDetermine if an int is within rangeLossy packing 32 bit integer to 16 bitComputing the square root of a 64-bit integerKeeping integer addition within boundsSafe multiplication of two 64-bit signed integersLeetcode 10: Regular Expression MatchingSigned integer-to-ascii x86_64 assembler macroReverse the digits of an Integer“Add two numbers given in reverse order from a linked list”

Category:Fedor von Bock Media in category "Fedor von Bock"Navigation menuUpload mediaISNI: 0000 0000 5511 3417VIAF ID: 24712551GND ID: 119294796Library of Congress authority ID: n96068363BnF ID: 12534305fSUDOC authorities ID: 034604189Open Library ID: OL338253ANKCR AUT ID: jn19990000869National Library of Israel ID: 000514068National Thesaurus for Author Names ID: 341574317ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

Kiel Indholdsfortegnelse Historie | Transport og færgeforbindelser | Sejlsport og anden sport | Kultur | Kendte personer fra Kiel | Noter | Litteratur | Eksterne henvisninger | Navigationsmenuwww.kiel.de54°19′31″N 10°8′26″Ø / 54.32528°N 10.14056°Ø / 54.32528; 10.14056Oberbürgermeister Dr. Ulf Kämpferwww.statistik-nord.deDen danske Stats StatistikKiels hjemmesiderrrWorldCat312794080n790547494030481-4