Why does apt-get install python3 with a trailing hyphen remove a lot of packages? [duplicate]apt-get install with '-' (minus / hyphen) removes packages“sudo apt-get install foo-” causes removing foo package and everything depending on itWhy does `apt-get install python-` remove everything?Default path changed after uninstalling python and reinstalling ubuntu-desktopPackages are removed when I use “apt-get install” with a hyphen after the package nameMust execute “sudo su” and then do apt-get update/upgrade/install, prefacing with sudo doesn't workRedirected OutputThe colors when doing “ls” at my ubuntu server diappeared just like thatapt-get remove indicator-bluetooth removes lot of packagesWhy does “sudo apt-get install gpsd” return with errors?How to restore after accidentally apt-get remove python'sudo apt autoremove python3' removed a lot of packages
Is this food a bread or a loaf?
Are objects structures and/or vice versa?
When blogging recipes, how can I support both readers who want the narrative/journey and ones who want the printer-friendly recipe?
Does it makes sense to buy a new cycle to learn riding?
What do you call words made from common English words?
Pristine Bit Checking
Is there a name of the flying bionic bird?
How many letters suffice to construct words with no repetition?
Can I find out the caloric content of bread by dehydrating it?
"My colleague's body is amazing"
A poker game description that does not feel gimmicky
Need help identifying/translating a plaque in Tangier, Morocco
How would photo IDs work for shapeshifters?
What do the Banks children have against barley water?
What does it exactly mean if a random variable follows a distribution
Add an angle to a sphere
Why do we use polarized capacitors?
Patience, young "Padovan"
Shall I use personal or official e-mail account when registering to external websites for work purpose?
Lied on resume at previous job
extract characters between two commas?
How to answer pointed "are you quitting" questioning when I don't want them to suspect
New order #4: World
Was there ever an axiom rendered a theorem?
Why does apt-get install python3 with a trailing hyphen remove a lot of packages? [duplicate]
apt-get install with '-' (minus / hyphen) removes packages“sudo apt-get install foo-” causes removing foo package and everything depending on itWhy does `apt-get install python-` remove everything?Default path changed after uninstalling python and reinstalling ubuntu-desktopPackages are removed when I use “apt-get install” with a hyphen after the package nameMust execute “sudo su” and then do apt-get update/upgrade/install, prefacing with sudo doesn't workRedirected OutputThe colors when doing “ls” at my ubuntu server diappeared just like thatapt-get remove indicator-bluetooth removes lot of packagesWhy does “sudo apt-get install gpsd” return with errors?How to restore after accidentally apt-get remove python'sudo apt autoremove python3' removed a lot of packages
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
This question already has an answer here:
apt-get install with '-' (minus / hyphen) removes packages
2 answers
“sudo apt-get install foo-” causes removing foo package and everything depending on it [duplicate]
2 answers
While is was installing something with the sudo apt-get install
command I accidentally accepted the command
sudo apt-get install python3-
(yeah I know it is stupid to just accept this but I did a lot of those and i just continued to click y
).
By executing the command I deleted my whole visual desktop of Ubuntu (I just had the plain shell but I recovered the visual desktop by now). I don't know if I am just stupid but nevertheless I want to create awareness that you shouldn't use the command.
If you can explain to me why happened what happened feel free to explain it to me.
command-line apt
New contributor
marked as duplicate by pomsky, karel, Zanna
StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
);
);
);
19 hours ago
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment |
This question already has an answer here:
apt-get install with '-' (minus / hyphen) removes packages
2 answers
“sudo apt-get install foo-” causes removing foo package and everything depending on it [duplicate]
2 answers
While is was installing something with the sudo apt-get install
command I accidentally accepted the command
sudo apt-get install python3-
(yeah I know it is stupid to just accept this but I did a lot of those and i just continued to click y
).
By executing the command I deleted my whole visual desktop of Ubuntu (I just had the plain shell but I recovered the visual desktop by now). I don't know if I am just stupid but nevertheless I want to create awareness that you shouldn't use the command.
If you can explain to me why happened what happened feel free to explain it to me.
command-line apt
New contributor
marked as duplicate by pomsky, karel, Zanna
StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
);
);
);
19 hours ago
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
8
Documented features are not bugs.
– guiverc
yesterday
2
I’m curious -why- this was decided to be the intended behavior. Seems unnecessary, and as the OP found, destructive.
– Scot
21 hours ago
@Scot I agree with you. Since there is already a dedicated command to remove packages I don't see the need for this feature. Seems like somebody wanted to include a "pro feature" that hurts new users and provides basically 0 value... The only case in which it would be useful is when you want to remove a package but your hand typesinstall
anyway and you realize at the end... but does this happen often enough to justify this feature? I don't think so.
– Giacomo Alzetta
19 hours ago
add a comment |
This question already has an answer here:
apt-get install with '-' (minus / hyphen) removes packages
2 answers
“sudo apt-get install foo-” causes removing foo package and everything depending on it [duplicate]
2 answers
While is was installing something with the sudo apt-get install
command I accidentally accepted the command
sudo apt-get install python3-
(yeah I know it is stupid to just accept this but I did a lot of those and i just continued to click y
).
By executing the command I deleted my whole visual desktop of Ubuntu (I just had the plain shell but I recovered the visual desktop by now). I don't know if I am just stupid but nevertheless I want to create awareness that you shouldn't use the command.
If you can explain to me why happened what happened feel free to explain it to me.
command-line apt
New contributor
This question already has an answer here:
apt-get install with '-' (minus / hyphen) removes packages
2 answers
“sudo apt-get install foo-” causes removing foo package and everything depending on it [duplicate]
2 answers
While is was installing something with the sudo apt-get install
command I accidentally accepted the command
sudo apt-get install python3-
(yeah I know it is stupid to just accept this but I did a lot of those and i just continued to click y
).
By executing the command I deleted my whole visual desktop of Ubuntu (I just had the plain shell but I recovered the visual desktop by now). I don't know if I am just stupid but nevertheless I want to create awareness that you shouldn't use the command.
If you can explain to me why happened what happened feel free to explain it to me.
This question already has an answer here:
apt-get install with '-' (minus / hyphen) removes packages
2 answers
“sudo apt-get install foo-” causes removing foo package and everything depending on it [duplicate]
2 answers
command-line apt
command-line apt
New contributor
New contributor
edited 20 hours ago
Community♦
1
1
New contributor
asked yesterday
Mettigel4_1Mettigel4_1
471
471
New contributor
New contributor
marked as duplicate by pomsky, karel, Zanna
StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
);
);
);
19 hours ago
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
marked as duplicate by pomsky, karel, Zanna
StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
);
);
);
19 hours ago
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
8
Documented features are not bugs.
– guiverc
yesterday
2
I’m curious -why- this was decided to be the intended behavior. Seems unnecessary, and as the OP found, destructive.
– Scot
21 hours ago
@Scot I agree with you. Since there is already a dedicated command to remove packages I don't see the need for this feature. Seems like somebody wanted to include a "pro feature" that hurts new users and provides basically 0 value... The only case in which it would be useful is when you want to remove a package but your hand typesinstall
anyway and you realize at the end... but does this happen often enough to justify this feature? I don't think so.
– Giacomo Alzetta
19 hours ago
add a comment |
8
Documented features are not bugs.
– guiverc
yesterday
2
I’m curious -why- this was decided to be the intended behavior. Seems unnecessary, and as the OP found, destructive.
– Scot
21 hours ago
@Scot I agree with you. Since there is already a dedicated command to remove packages I don't see the need for this feature. Seems like somebody wanted to include a "pro feature" that hurts new users and provides basically 0 value... The only case in which it would be useful is when you want to remove a package but your hand typesinstall
anyway and you realize at the end... but does this happen often enough to justify this feature? I don't think so.
– Giacomo Alzetta
19 hours ago
8
8
Documented features are not bugs.
– guiverc
yesterday
Documented features are not bugs.
– guiverc
yesterday
2
2
I’m curious -why- this was decided to be the intended behavior. Seems unnecessary, and as the OP found, destructive.
– Scot
21 hours ago
I’m curious -why- this was decided to be the intended behavior. Seems unnecessary, and as the OP found, destructive.
– Scot
21 hours ago
@Scot I agree with you. Since there is already a dedicated command to remove packages I don't see the need for this feature. Seems like somebody wanted to include a "pro feature" that hurts new users and provides basically 0 value... The only case in which it would be useful is when you want to remove a package but your hand types
install
anyway and you realize at the end... but does this happen often enough to justify this feature? I don't think so.– Giacomo Alzetta
19 hours ago
@Scot I agree with you. Since there is already a dedicated command to remove packages I don't see the need for this feature. Seems like somebody wanted to include a "pro feature" that hurts new users and provides basically 0 value... The only case in which it would be useful is when you want to remove a package but your hand types
install
anyway and you realize at the end... but does this happen often enough to justify this feature? I don't think so.– Giacomo Alzetta
19 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
This is not a bug; this is documented in the man
page. From man apt-get
's install
section1 (emphasis mine):
If a hyphen is appended to the package name (with no intervening space), the identified package will be removed if it is installed. Similarly a plus sign can be used to designate a package to install.
So, when you did:
sudo apt-get install python3-
you've removed the python3
package and all the dependent packages (which includes the packages you mentioned).
Fix:
Firstly, you can install the ubuntu-desktop
metapackage to get the default desktop environment back:
sudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop
Now, to re-install the removed packages, go to /var/log/apt/history.log
, pick the packages, and run sudo apt-get install
on them.
You might also want to peek into /var/log/dpkg.log
.
1 If you have less
as the man
pager, you can go to the install
section of man apt-get
directly:
LESS='+/^[[:blank:]]+install' man apt-get
6
It might be worth mentioning thatsudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop
will get most of the desktop environment back with a single command, without needing to hunt down individual package names. (Of course that doesn't cover whatever one has installed manually on top of the defaults, but further recovery can proceed in an environment that may be more familiar than the Linux console).
– Henning Makholm
yesterday
@HenningMakholm Makes sense; edited.
– heemayl
19 hours ago
add a comment |
No, you didn't find a bug. From man apt-get
:
If a hyphen is appended to the package name (with no intervening space), the identified package will be removed if it is installed. Similarly a plus sign can be used to designate a package to install. These latter features may be used to override decisions made by apt-get's conflict resolution system.
It's intentional. I'm not sure it's good design, but it is worth reading what changes apt proposes before proceeding.
Combined with globbing it may produce some rather... spectacular results at times.
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
This is not a bug; this is documented in the man
page. From man apt-get
's install
section1 (emphasis mine):
If a hyphen is appended to the package name (with no intervening space), the identified package will be removed if it is installed. Similarly a plus sign can be used to designate a package to install.
So, when you did:
sudo apt-get install python3-
you've removed the python3
package and all the dependent packages (which includes the packages you mentioned).
Fix:
Firstly, you can install the ubuntu-desktop
metapackage to get the default desktop environment back:
sudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop
Now, to re-install the removed packages, go to /var/log/apt/history.log
, pick the packages, and run sudo apt-get install
on them.
You might also want to peek into /var/log/dpkg.log
.
1 If you have less
as the man
pager, you can go to the install
section of man apt-get
directly:
LESS='+/^[[:blank:]]+install' man apt-get
6
It might be worth mentioning thatsudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop
will get most of the desktop environment back with a single command, without needing to hunt down individual package names. (Of course that doesn't cover whatever one has installed manually on top of the defaults, but further recovery can proceed in an environment that may be more familiar than the Linux console).
– Henning Makholm
yesterday
@HenningMakholm Makes sense; edited.
– heemayl
19 hours ago
add a comment |
This is not a bug; this is documented in the man
page. From man apt-get
's install
section1 (emphasis mine):
If a hyphen is appended to the package name (with no intervening space), the identified package will be removed if it is installed. Similarly a plus sign can be used to designate a package to install.
So, when you did:
sudo apt-get install python3-
you've removed the python3
package and all the dependent packages (which includes the packages you mentioned).
Fix:
Firstly, you can install the ubuntu-desktop
metapackage to get the default desktop environment back:
sudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop
Now, to re-install the removed packages, go to /var/log/apt/history.log
, pick the packages, and run sudo apt-get install
on them.
You might also want to peek into /var/log/dpkg.log
.
1 If you have less
as the man
pager, you can go to the install
section of man apt-get
directly:
LESS='+/^[[:blank:]]+install' man apt-get
6
It might be worth mentioning thatsudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop
will get most of the desktop environment back with a single command, without needing to hunt down individual package names. (Of course that doesn't cover whatever one has installed manually on top of the defaults, but further recovery can proceed in an environment that may be more familiar than the Linux console).
– Henning Makholm
yesterday
@HenningMakholm Makes sense; edited.
– heemayl
19 hours ago
add a comment |
This is not a bug; this is documented in the man
page. From man apt-get
's install
section1 (emphasis mine):
If a hyphen is appended to the package name (with no intervening space), the identified package will be removed if it is installed. Similarly a plus sign can be used to designate a package to install.
So, when you did:
sudo apt-get install python3-
you've removed the python3
package and all the dependent packages (which includes the packages you mentioned).
Fix:
Firstly, you can install the ubuntu-desktop
metapackage to get the default desktop environment back:
sudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop
Now, to re-install the removed packages, go to /var/log/apt/history.log
, pick the packages, and run sudo apt-get install
on them.
You might also want to peek into /var/log/dpkg.log
.
1 If you have less
as the man
pager, you can go to the install
section of man apt-get
directly:
LESS='+/^[[:blank:]]+install' man apt-get
This is not a bug; this is documented in the man
page. From man apt-get
's install
section1 (emphasis mine):
If a hyphen is appended to the package name (with no intervening space), the identified package will be removed if it is installed. Similarly a plus sign can be used to designate a package to install.
So, when you did:
sudo apt-get install python3-
you've removed the python3
package and all the dependent packages (which includes the packages you mentioned).
Fix:
Firstly, you can install the ubuntu-desktop
metapackage to get the default desktop environment back:
sudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop
Now, to re-install the removed packages, go to /var/log/apt/history.log
, pick the packages, and run sudo apt-get install
on them.
You might also want to peek into /var/log/dpkg.log
.
1 If you have less
as the man
pager, you can go to the install
section of man apt-get
directly:
LESS='+/^[[:blank:]]+install' man apt-get
edited 19 hours ago
answered yesterday
heemaylheemayl
68.1k11142215
68.1k11142215
6
It might be worth mentioning thatsudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop
will get most of the desktop environment back with a single command, without needing to hunt down individual package names. (Of course that doesn't cover whatever one has installed manually on top of the defaults, but further recovery can proceed in an environment that may be more familiar than the Linux console).
– Henning Makholm
yesterday
@HenningMakholm Makes sense; edited.
– heemayl
19 hours ago
add a comment |
6
It might be worth mentioning thatsudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop
will get most of the desktop environment back with a single command, without needing to hunt down individual package names. (Of course that doesn't cover whatever one has installed manually on top of the defaults, but further recovery can proceed in an environment that may be more familiar than the Linux console).
– Henning Makholm
yesterday
@HenningMakholm Makes sense; edited.
– heemayl
19 hours ago
6
6
It might be worth mentioning that
sudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop
will get most of the desktop environment back with a single command, without needing to hunt down individual package names. (Of course that doesn't cover whatever one has installed manually on top of the defaults, but further recovery can proceed in an environment that may be more familiar than the Linux console).– Henning Makholm
yesterday
It might be worth mentioning that
sudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop
will get most of the desktop environment back with a single command, without needing to hunt down individual package names. (Of course that doesn't cover whatever one has installed manually on top of the defaults, but further recovery can proceed in an environment that may be more familiar than the Linux console).– Henning Makholm
yesterday
@HenningMakholm Makes sense; edited.
– heemayl
19 hours ago
@HenningMakholm Makes sense; edited.
– heemayl
19 hours ago
add a comment |
No, you didn't find a bug. From man apt-get
:
If a hyphen is appended to the package name (with no intervening space), the identified package will be removed if it is installed. Similarly a plus sign can be used to designate a package to install. These latter features may be used to override decisions made by apt-get's conflict resolution system.
It's intentional. I'm not sure it's good design, but it is worth reading what changes apt proposes before proceeding.
Combined with globbing it may produce some rather... spectacular results at times.
add a comment |
No, you didn't find a bug. From man apt-get
:
If a hyphen is appended to the package name (with no intervening space), the identified package will be removed if it is installed. Similarly a plus sign can be used to designate a package to install. These latter features may be used to override decisions made by apt-get's conflict resolution system.
It's intentional. I'm not sure it's good design, but it is worth reading what changes apt proposes before proceeding.
Combined with globbing it may produce some rather... spectacular results at times.
add a comment |
No, you didn't find a bug. From man apt-get
:
If a hyphen is appended to the package name (with no intervening space), the identified package will be removed if it is installed. Similarly a plus sign can be used to designate a package to install. These latter features may be used to override decisions made by apt-get's conflict resolution system.
It's intentional. I'm not sure it's good design, but it is worth reading what changes apt proposes before proceeding.
Combined with globbing it may produce some rather... spectacular results at times.
No, you didn't find a bug. From man apt-get
:
If a hyphen is appended to the package name (with no intervening space), the identified package will be removed if it is installed. Similarly a plus sign can be used to designate a package to install. These latter features may be used to override decisions made by apt-get's conflict resolution system.
It's intentional. I'm not sure it's good design, but it is worth reading what changes apt proposes before proceeding.
Combined with globbing it may produce some rather... spectacular results at times.
edited yesterday
N0rbert
25.2k853118
25.2k853118
answered yesterday
vidarlovidarlo
10.7k52852
10.7k52852
add a comment |
add a comment |
8
Documented features are not bugs.
– guiverc
yesterday
2
I’m curious -why- this was decided to be the intended behavior. Seems unnecessary, and as the OP found, destructive.
– Scot
21 hours ago
@Scot I agree with you. Since there is already a dedicated command to remove packages I don't see the need for this feature. Seems like somebody wanted to include a "pro feature" that hurts new users and provides basically 0 value... The only case in which it would be useful is when you want to remove a package but your hand types
install
anyway and you realize at the end... but does this happen often enough to justify this feature? I don't think so.– Giacomo Alzetta
19 hours ago