Why does apt-get install python3 with a trailing hyphen remove a lot of packages? [duplicate]apt-get install with '-' (minus / hyphen) removes packages“sudo apt-get install foo-” causes removing foo package and everything depending on itWhy does `apt-get install python-` remove everything?Default path changed after uninstalling python and reinstalling ubuntu-desktopPackages are removed when I use “apt-get install” with a hyphen after the package nameMust execute “sudo su” and then do apt-get update/upgrade/install, prefacing with sudo doesn't workRedirected OutputThe colors when doing “ls” at my ubuntu server diappeared just like thatapt-get remove indicator-bluetooth removes lot of packagesWhy does “sudo apt-get install gpsd” return with errors?How to restore after accidentally apt-get remove python'sudo apt autoremove python3' removed a lot of packages

Is this food a bread or a loaf?

Are objects structures and/or vice versa?

When blogging recipes, how can I support both readers who want the narrative/journey and ones who want the printer-friendly recipe?

Does it makes sense to buy a new cycle to learn riding?

What do you call words made from common English words?

Pristine Bit Checking

Is there a name of the flying bionic bird?

How many letters suffice to construct words with no repetition?

Can I find out the caloric content of bread by dehydrating it?

"My colleague's body is amazing"

A poker game description that does not feel gimmicky

Need help identifying/translating a plaque in Tangier, Morocco

How would photo IDs work for shapeshifters?

What do the Banks children have against barley water?

What does it exactly mean if a random variable follows a distribution

Add an angle to a sphere

Why do we use polarized capacitors?

Patience, young "Padovan"

Shall I use personal or official e-mail account when registering to external websites for work purpose?

Lied on resume at previous job

extract characters between two commas?

How to answer pointed "are you quitting" questioning when I don't want them to suspect

New order #4: World

Was there ever an axiom rendered a theorem?



Why does apt-get install python3 with a trailing hyphen remove a lot of packages? [duplicate]


apt-get install with '-' (minus / hyphen) removes packages“sudo apt-get install foo-” causes removing foo package and everything depending on itWhy does `apt-get install python-` remove everything?Default path changed after uninstalling python and reinstalling ubuntu-desktopPackages are removed when I use “apt-get install” with a hyphen after the package nameMust execute “sudo su” and then do apt-get update/upgrade/install, prefacing with sudo doesn't workRedirected OutputThe colors when doing “ls” at my ubuntu server diappeared just like thatapt-get remove indicator-bluetooth removes lot of packagesWhy does “sudo apt-get install gpsd” return with errors?How to restore after accidentally apt-get remove python'sudo apt autoremove python3' removed a lot of packages






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








8
















This question already has an answer here:



  • apt-get install with '-' (minus / hyphen) removes packages

    2 answers



  • “sudo apt-get install foo-” causes removing foo package and everything depending on it [duplicate]

    2 answers



While is was installing something with the sudo apt-get install command I accidentally accepted the command



sudo apt-get install python3-


(yeah I know it is stupid to just accept this but I did a lot of those and i just continued to click y).



By executing the command I deleted my whole visual desktop of Ubuntu (I just had the plain shell but I recovered the visual desktop by now). I don't know if I am just stupid but nevertheless I want to create awareness that you shouldn't use the command.



If you can explain to me why happened what happened feel free to explain it to me.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Mettigel4_1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











marked as duplicate by pomsky, karel, Zanna command-line
Users with the  command-line badge can single-handedly close command-line questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();

);
);
);
19 hours ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.













  • 8





    Documented features are not bugs.

    – guiverc
    yesterday






  • 2





    I’m curious -why- this was decided to be the intended behavior. Seems unnecessary, and as the OP found, destructive.

    – Scot
    21 hours ago











  • @Scot I agree with you. Since there is already a dedicated command to remove packages I don't see the need for this feature. Seems like somebody wanted to include a "pro feature" that hurts new users and provides basically 0 value... The only case in which it would be useful is when you want to remove a package but your hand types install anyway and you realize at the end... but does this happen often enough to justify this feature? I don't think so.

    – Giacomo Alzetta
    19 hours ago

















8
















This question already has an answer here:



  • apt-get install with '-' (minus / hyphen) removes packages

    2 answers



  • “sudo apt-get install foo-” causes removing foo package and everything depending on it [duplicate]

    2 answers



While is was installing something with the sudo apt-get install command I accidentally accepted the command



sudo apt-get install python3-


(yeah I know it is stupid to just accept this but I did a lot of those and i just continued to click y).



By executing the command I deleted my whole visual desktop of Ubuntu (I just had the plain shell but I recovered the visual desktop by now). I don't know if I am just stupid but nevertheless I want to create awareness that you shouldn't use the command.



If you can explain to me why happened what happened feel free to explain it to me.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Mettigel4_1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











marked as duplicate by pomsky, karel, Zanna command-line
Users with the  command-line badge can single-handedly close command-line questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();

);
);
);
19 hours ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.













  • 8





    Documented features are not bugs.

    – guiverc
    yesterday






  • 2





    I’m curious -why- this was decided to be the intended behavior. Seems unnecessary, and as the OP found, destructive.

    – Scot
    21 hours ago











  • @Scot I agree with you. Since there is already a dedicated command to remove packages I don't see the need for this feature. Seems like somebody wanted to include a "pro feature" that hurts new users and provides basically 0 value... The only case in which it would be useful is when you want to remove a package but your hand types install anyway and you realize at the end... but does this happen often enough to justify this feature? I don't think so.

    – Giacomo Alzetta
    19 hours ago













8












8








8









This question already has an answer here:



  • apt-get install with '-' (minus / hyphen) removes packages

    2 answers



  • “sudo apt-get install foo-” causes removing foo package and everything depending on it [duplicate]

    2 answers



While is was installing something with the sudo apt-get install command I accidentally accepted the command



sudo apt-get install python3-


(yeah I know it is stupid to just accept this but I did a lot of those and i just continued to click y).



By executing the command I deleted my whole visual desktop of Ubuntu (I just had the plain shell but I recovered the visual desktop by now). I don't know if I am just stupid but nevertheless I want to create awareness that you shouldn't use the command.



If you can explain to me why happened what happened feel free to explain it to me.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Mettigel4_1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.













This question already has an answer here:



  • apt-get install with '-' (minus / hyphen) removes packages

    2 answers



  • “sudo apt-get install foo-” causes removing foo package and everything depending on it [duplicate]

    2 answers



While is was installing something with the sudo apt-get install command I accidentally accepted the command



sudo apt-get install python3-


(yeah I know it is stupid to just accept this but I did a lot of those and i just continued to click y).



By executing the command I deleted my whole visual desktop of Ubuntu (I just had the plain shell but I recovered the visual desktop by now). I don't know if I am just stupid but nevertheless I want to create awareness that you shouldn't use the command.



If you can explain to me why happened what happened feel free to explain it to me.





This question already has an answer here:



  • apt-get install with '-' (minus / hyphen) removes packages

    2 answers



  • “sudo apt-get install foo-” causes removing foo package and everything depending on it [duplicate]

    2 answers







command-line apt






share|improve this question









New contributor




Mettigel4_1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Mettigel4_1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 20 hours ago









Community

1




1






New contributor




Mettigel4_1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









Mettigel4_1Mettigel4_1

471




471




New contributor




Mettigel4_1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Mettigel4_1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Mettigel4_1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




marked as duplicate by pomsky, karel, Zanna command-line
Users with the  command-line badge can single-handedly close command-line questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();

);
);
);
19 hours ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.









marked as duplicate by pomsky, karel, Zanna command-line
Users with the  command-line badge can single-handedly close command-line questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();

);
);
);
19 hours ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.









  • 8





    Documented features are not bugs.

    – guiverc
    yesterday






  • 2





    I’m curious -why- this was decided to be the intended behavior. Seems unnecessary, and as the OP found, destructive.

    – Scot
    21 hours ago











  • @Scot I agree with you. Since there is already a dedicated command to remove packages I don't see the need for this feature. Seems like somebody wanted to include a "pro feature" that hurts new users and provides basically 0 value... The only case in which it would be useful is when you want to remove a package but your hand types install anyway and you realize at the end... but does this happen often enough to justify this feature? I don't think so.

    – Giacomo Alzetta
    19 hours ago












  • 8





    Documented features are not bugs.

    – guiverc
    yesterday






  • 2





    I’m curious -why- this was decided to be the intended behavior. Seems unnecessary, and as the OP found, destructive.

    – Scot
    21 hours ago











  • @Scot I agree with you. Since there is already a dedicated command to remove packages I don't see the need for this feature. Seems like somebody wanted to include a "pro feature" that hurts new users and provides basically 0 value... The only case in which it would be useful is when you want to remove a package but your hand types install anyway and you realize at the end... but does this happen often enough to justify this feature? I don't think so.

    – Giacomo Alzetta
    19 hours ago







8




8





Documented features are not bugs.

– guiverc
yesterday





Documented features are not bugs.

– guiverc
yesterday




2




2





I’m curious -why- this was decided to be the intended behavior. Seems unnecessary, and as the OP found, destructive.

– Scot
21 hours ago





I’m curious -why- this was decided to be the intended behavior. Seems unnecessary, and as the OP found, destructive.

– Scot
21 hours ago













@Scot I agree with you. Since there is already a dedicated command to remove packages I don't see the need for this feature. Seems like somebody wanted to include a "pro feature" that hurts new users and provides basically 0 value... The only case in which it would be useful is when you want to remove a package but your hand types install anyway and you realize at the end... but does this happen often enough to justify this feature? I don't think so.

– Giacomo Alzetta
19 hours ago





@Scot I agree with you. Since there is already a dedicated command to remove packages I don't see the need for this feature. Seems like somebody wanted to include a "pro feature" that hurts new users and provides basically 0 value... The only case in which it would be useful is when you want to remove a package but your hand types install anyway and you realize at the end... but does this happen often enough to justify this feature? I don't think so.

– Giacomo Alzetta
19 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















22














This is not a bug; this is documented in the man page. From man apt-get's install section1 (emphasis mine):




If a hyphen is appended to the package name (with no intervening space), the identified package will be removed if it is installed. Similarly a plus sign can be used to designate a package to install.




So, when you did:



sudo apt-get install python3-


you've removed the python3 package and all the dependent packages (which includes the packages you mentioned).




Fix:



Firstly, you can install the ubuntu-desktop metapackage to get the default desktop environment back:



sudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop


Now, to re-install the removed packages, go to /var/log/apt/history.log, pick the packages, and run sudo apt-get install on them.



You might also want to peek into /var/log/dpkg.log.




1 If you have less as the man pager, you can go to the install section of man apt-get directly:



LESS='+/^[[:blank:]]+install' man apt-get





share|improve this answer




















  • 6





    It might be worth mentioning that sudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop will get most of the desktop environment back with a single command, without needing to hunt down individual package names. (Of course that doesn't cover whatever one has installed manually on top of the defaults, but further recovery can proceed in an environment that may be more familiar than the Linux console).

    – Henning Makholm
    yesterday












  • @HenningMakholm Makes sense; edited.

    – heemayl
    19 hours ago


















10














No, you didn't find a bug. From man apt-get:




If a hyphen is appended to the package name (with no intervening space), the identified package will be removed if it is installed. Similarly a plus sign can be used to designate a package to install. These latter features may be used to override decisions made by apt-get's conflict resolution system.




It's intentional. I'm not sure it's good design, but it is worth reading what changes apt proposes before proceeding.



Combined with globbing it may produce some rather... spectacular results at times.






share|improve this answer































    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    22














    This is not a bug; this is documented in the man page. From man apt-get's install section1 (emphasis mine):




    If a hyphen is appended to the package name (with no intervening space), the identified package will be removed if it is installed. Similarly a plus sign can be used to designate a package to install.




    So, when you did:



    sudo apt-get install python3-


    you've removed the python3 package and all the dependent packages (which includes the packages you mentioned).




    Fix:



    Firstly, you can install the ubuntu-desktop metapackage to get the default desktop environment back:



    sudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop


    Now, to re-install the removed packages, go to /var/log/apt/history.log, pick the packages, and run sudo apt-get install on them.



    You might also want to peek into /var/log/dpkg.log.




    1 If you have less as the man pager, you can go to the install section of man apt-get directly:



    LESS='+/^[[:blank:]]+install' man apt-get





    share|improve this answer




















    • 6





      It might be worth mentioning that sudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop will get most of the desktop environment back with a single command, without needing to hunt down individual package names. (Of course that doesn't cover whatever one has installed manually on top of the defaults, but further recovery can proceed in an environment that may be more familiar than the Linux console).

      – Henning Makholm
      yesterday












    • @HenningMakholm Makes sense; edited.

      – heemayl
      19 hours ago















    22














    This is not a bug; this is documented in the man page. From man apt-get's install section1 (emphasis mine):




    If a hyphen is appended to the package name (with no intervening space), the identified package will be removed if it is installed. Similarly a plus sign can be used to designate a package to install.




    So, when you did:



    sudo apt-get install python3-


    you've removed the python3 package and all the dependent packages (which includes the packages you mentioned).




    Fix:



    Firstly, you can install the ubuntu-desktop metapackage to get the default desktop environment back:



    sudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop


    Now, to re-install the removed packages, go to /var/log/apt/history.log, pick the packages, and run sudo apt-get install on them.



    You might also want to peek into /var/log/dpkg.log.




    1 If you have less as the man pager, you can go to the install section of man apt-get directly:



    LESS='+/^[[:blank:]]+install' man apt-get





    share|improve this answer




















    • 6





      It might be worth mentioning that sudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop will get most of the desktop environment back with a single command, without needing to hunt down individual package names. (Of course that doesn't cover whatever one has installed manually on top of the defaults, but further recovery can proceed in an environment that may be more familiar than the Linux console).

      – Henning Makholm
      yesterday












    • @HenningMakholm Makes sense; edited.

      – heemayl
      19 hours ago













    22












    22








    22







    This is not a bug; this is documented in the man page. From man apt-get's install section1 (emphasis mine):




    If a hyphen is appended to the package name (with no intervening space), the identified package will be removed if it is installed. Similarly a plus sign can be used to designate a package to install.




    So, when you did:



    sudo apt-get install python3-


    you've removed the python3 package and all the dependent packages (which includes the packages you mentioned).




    Fix:



    Firstly, you can install the ubuntu-desktop metapackage to get the default desktop environment back:



    sudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop


    Now, to re-install the removed packages, go to /var/log/apt/history.log, pick the packages, and run sudo apt-get install on them.



    You might also want to peek into /var/log/dpkg.log.




    1 If you have less as the man pager, you can go to the install section of man apt-get directly:



    LESS='+/^[[:blank:]]+install' man apt-get





    share|improve this answer















    This is not a bug; this is documented in the man page. From man apt-get's install section1 (emphasis mine):




    If a hyphen is appended to the package name (with no intervening space), the identified package will be removed if it is installed. Similarly a plus sign can be used to designate a package to install.




    So, when you did:



    sudo apt-get install python3-


    you've removed the python3 package and all the dependent packages (which includes the packages you mentioned).




    Fix:



    Firstly, you can install the ubuntu-desktop metapackage to get the default desktop environment back:



    sudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop


    Now, to re-install the removed packages, go to /var/log/apt/history.log, pick the packages, and run sudo apt-get install on them.



    You might also want to peek into /var/log/dpkg.log.




    1 If you have less as the man pager, you can go to the install section of man apt-get directly:



    LESS='+/^[[:blank:]]+install' man apt-get






    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 19 hours ago

























    answered yesterday









    heemaylheemayl

    68.1k11142215




    68.1k11142215







    • 6





      It might be worth mentioning that sudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop will get most of the desktop environment back with a single command, without needing to hunt down individual package names. (Of course that doesn't cover whatever one has installed manually on top of the defaults, but further recovery can proceed in an environment that may be more familiar than the Linux console).

      – Henning Makholm
      yesterday












    • @HenningMakholm Makes sense; edited.

      – heemayl
      19 hours ago












    • 6





      It might be worth mentioning that sudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop will get most of the desktop environment back with a single command, without needing to hunt down individual package names. (Of course that doesn't cover whatever one has installed manually on top of the defaults, but further recovery can proceed in an environment that may be more familiar than the Linux console).

      – Henning Makholm
      yesterday












    • @HenningMakholm Makes sense; edited.

      – heemayl
      19 hours ago







    6




    6





    It might be worth mentioning that sudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop will get most of the desktop environment back with a single command, without needing to hunt down individual package names. (Of course that doesn't cover whatever one has installed manually on top of the defaults, but further recovery can proceed in an environment that may be more familiar than the Linux console).

    – Henning Makholm
    yesterday






    It might be worth mentioning that sudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop will get most of the desktop environment back with a single command, without needing to hunt down individual package names. (Of course that doesn't cover whatever one has installed manually on top of the defaults, but further recovery can proceed in an environment that may be more familiar than the Linux console).

    – Henning Makholm
    yesterday














    @HenningMakholm Makes sense; edited.

    – heemayl
    19 hours ago





    @HenningMakholm Makes sense; edited.

    – heemayl
    19 hours ago













    10














    No, you didn't find a bug. From man apt-get:




    If a hyphen is appended to the package name (with no intervening space), the identified package will be removed if it is installed. Similarly a plus sign can be used to designate a package to install. These latter features may be used to override decisions made by apt-get's conflict resolution system.




    It's intentional. I'm not sure it's good design, but it is worth reading what changes apt proposes before proceeding.



    Combined with globbing it may produce some rather... spectacular results at times.






    share|improve this answer





























      10














      No, you didn't find a bug. From man apt-get:




      If a hyphen is appended to the package name (with no intervening space), the identified package will be removed if it is installed. Similarly a plus sign can be used to designate a package to install. These latter features may be used to override decisions made by apt-get's conflict resolution system.




      It's intentional. I'm not sure it's good design, but it is worth reading what changes apt proposes before proceeding.



      Combined with globbing it may produce some rather... spectacular results at times.






      share|improve this answer



























        10












        10








        10







        No, you didn't find a bug. From man apt-get:




        If a hyphen is appended to the package name (with no intervening space), the identified package will be removed if it is installed. Similarly a plus sign can be used to designate a package to install. These latter features may be used to override decisions made by apt-get's conflict resolution system.




        It's intentional. I'm not sure it's good design, but it is worth reading what changes apt proposes before proceeding.



        Combined with globbing it may produce some rather... spectacular results at times.






        share|improve this answer















        No, you didn't find a bug. From man apt-get:




        If a hyphen is appended to the package name (with no intervening space), the identified package will be removed if it is installed. Similarly a plus sign can be used to designate a package to install. These latter features may be used to override decisions made by apt-get's conflict resolution system.




        It's intentional. I'm not sure it's good design, but it is worth reading what changes apt proposes before proceeding.



        Combined with globbing it may produce some rather... spectacular results at times.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited yesterday









        N0rbert

        25.2k853118




        25.2k853118










        answered yesterday









        vidarlovidarlo

        10.7k52852




        10.7k52852













            Popular posts from this blog

            Reverse int within the 32-bit signed integer range: [−2^31, 2^31 − 1]Combining two 32-bit integers into one 64-bit integerDetermine if an int is within rangeLossy packing 32 bit integer to 16 bitComputing the square root of a 64-bit integerKeeping integer addition within boundsSafe multiplication of two 64-bit signed integersLeetcode 10: Regular Expression MatchingSigned integer-to-ascii x86_64 assembler macroReverse the digits of an Integer“Add two numbers given in reverse order from a linked list”

            Category:Fedor von Bock Media in category "Fedor von Bock"Navigation menuUpload mediaISNI: 0000 0000 5511 3417VIAF ID: 24712551GND ID: 119294796Library of Congress authority ID: n96068363BnF ID: 12534305fSUDOC authorities ID: 034604189Open Library ID: OL338253ANKCR AUT ID: jn19990000869National Library of Israel ID: 000514068National Thesaurus for Author Names ID: 341574317ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

            Kiel Indholdsfortegnelse Historie | Transport og færgeforbindelser | Sejlsport og anden sport | Kultur | Kendte personer fra Kiel | Noter | Litteratur | Eksterne henvisninger | Navigationsmenuwww.kiel.de54°19′31″N 10°8′26″Ø / 54.32528°N 10.14056°Ø / 54.32528; 10.14056Oberbürgermeister Dr. Ulf Kämpferwww.statistik-nord.deDen danske Stats StatistikKiels hjemmesiderrrWorldCat312794080n790547494030481-4