Basic combinations logic doubt in probabilityProbability of picking three marbles in ordergetting an outcome x number of attemptsProbability of a certain outcomeProbability of drawing colored MarblesProbability with changing number of marblesExpected number o f draws with replacement to reach probability.Probability that the first marble was blue, given the second is blueGiven a bag of 3 red marbles, 5 black, and 8 green, what is the probability that?A bag contains contains 20 blue marbles, 20 green marbles, and 20 red marblesMarble probability without replacement question
New order #4: World
Copycat chess is back
What happens when a metallic dragon and a chromatic dragon mate?
Sort in WP_Query(), not filter? Is it possible?
Does the average primeness of natural numbers tend to zero?
Is there a familial term for apples and pears?
Are objects structures and/or vice versa?
What does "enim et" mean?
Is there a way to make member function NOT callable from constructor?
Is this food a bread or a loaf?
Some basic questions on halt and move in Turing machines
extract characters between two commas?
What is the meaning of "of trouble" in the following sentence?
Why does this relative pronoun not take the case of the noun it is referring to?
What do the Banks children have against barley water?
Why was the "bread communication" in the arena of Catching Fire left out in the movie?
When blogging recipes, how can I support both readers who want the narrative/journey and ones who want the printer-friendly recipe?
Is domain driven design an anti-SQL pattern?
Information to fellow intern about hiring?
Is "plugging out" electronic devices an American expression?
Manga about a female worker who got dragged into another world together with this high school girl and she was just told she's not needed anymore
Calculate Levenshtein distance between two strings in Python
Could Giant Ground Sloths have been a Good Pack Animal for the Ancient Mayans
How did the USSR manage to innovate in an environment characterized by government censorship and high bureaucracy?
Basic combinations logic doubt in probability
Probability of picking three marbles in ordergetting an outcome x number of attemptsProbability of a certain outcomeProbability of drawing colored MarblesProbability with changing number of marblesExpected number o f draws with replacement to reach probability.Probability that the first marble was blue, given the second is blueGiven a bag of 3 red marbles, 5 black, and 8 green, what is the probability that?A bag contains contains 20 blue marbles, 20 green marbles, and 20 red marblesMarble probability without replacement question
$begingroup$
"If $3$ students are chosen at random from a class with $6$ girls and $4$ boys, what is the probability that all $3$ students chosen will be girls?"
$left(dfrac610right)left(dfrac59right)left(dfrac48right)$
So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?
"A bag holds $4$ red marbles, $5$ blue marbles, and $2$ green marbles. If $5$ marbles are selected one after another without replacement, what is the probability of drawing $2$ red marbles, $2$ blue marbles, and $1$ green marble?"
My answer: $left(dfrac411right)left(dfrac310right)left(dfrac59right)left(dfrac48right)left(dfrac27right)$
But the correct answer is $dfrac(_4C_2) cdot (_5C_2) cdot (_2C_1)_11C_5$ (where $C$ is a combination).
Why doesn't the logic from the first problem work here?
The draws are without replacement in all cases.
probability combinatorics permutations combinations
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
"If $3$ students are chosen at random from a class with $6$ girls and $4$ boys, what is the probability that all $3$ students chosen will be girls?"
$left(dfrac610right)left(dfrac59right)left(dfrac48right)$
So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?
"A bag holds $4$ red marbles, $5$ blue marbles, and $2$ green marbles. If $5$ marbles are selected one after another without replacement, what is the probability of drawing $2$ red marbles, $2$ blue marbles, and $1$ green marble?"
My answer: $left(dfrac411right)left(dfrac310right)left(dfrac59right)left(dfrac48right)left(dfrac27right)$
But the correct answer is $dfrac(_4C_2) cdot (_5C_2) cdot (_2C_1)_11C_5$ (where $C$ is a combination).
Why doesn't the logic from the first problem work here?
The draws are without replacement in all cases.
probability combinatorics permutations combinations
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Is the drawing with/without replacement in both cases?
$endgroup$
– NoChance
yesterday
$begingroup$
@NoChance: without replacement for both cases.
$endgroup$
– Lucky
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
"If $3$ students are chosen at random from a class with $6$ girls and $4$ boys, what is the probability that all $3$ students chosen will be girls?"
$left(dfrac610right)left(dfrac59right)left(dfrac48right)$
So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?
"A bag holds $4$ red marbles, $5$ blue marbles, and $2$ green marbles. If $5$ marbles are selected one after another without replacement, what is the probability of drawing $2$ red marbles, $2$ blue marbles, and $1$ green marble?"
My answer: $left(dfrac411right)left(dfrac310right)left(dfrac59right)left(dfrac48right)left(dfrac27right)$
But the correct answer is $dfrac(_4C_2) cdot (_5C_2) cdot (_2C_1)_11C_5$ (where $C$ is a combination).
Why doesn't the logic from the first problem work here?
The draws are without replacement in all cases.
probability combinatorics permutations combinations
$endgroup$
"If $3$ students are chosen at random from a class with $6$ girls and $4$ boys, what is the probability that all $3$ students chosen will be girls?"
$left(dfrac610right)left(dfrac59right)left(dfrac48right)$
So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?
"A bag holds $4$ red marbles, $5$ blue marbles, and $2$ green marbles. If $5$ marbles are selected one after another without replacement, what is the probability of drawing $2$ red marbles, $2$ blue marbles, and $1$ green marble?"
My answer: $left(dfrac411right)left(dfrac310right)left(dfrac59right)left(dfrac48right)left(dfrac27right)$
But the correct answer is $dfrac(_4C_2) cdot (_5C_2) cdot (_2C_1)_11C_5$ (where $C$ is a combination).
Why doesn't the logic from the first problem work here?
The draws are without replacement in all cases.
probability combinatorics permutations combinations
probability combinatorics permutations combinations
edited yesterday
Bladewood
337213
337213
asked yesterday
LuckyLucky
294
294
$begingroup$
Is the drawing with/without replacement in both cases?
$endgroup$
– NoChance
yesterday
$begingroup$
@NoChance: without replacement for both cases.
$endgroup$
– Lucky
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is the drawing with/without replacement in both cases?
$endgroup$
– NoChance
yesterday
$begingroup$
@NoChance: without replacement for both cases.
$endgroup$
– Lucky
yesterday
$begingroup$
Is the drawing with/without replacement in both cases?
$endgroup$
– NoChance
yesterday
$begingroup$
Is the drawing with/without replacement in both cases?
$endgroup$
– NoChance
yesterday
$begingroup$
@NoChance: without replacement for both cases.
$endgroup$
– Lucky
yesterday
$begingroup$
@NoChance: without replacement for both cases.
$endgroup$
– Lucky
yesterday
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
What you calculated is the probability of selecting two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble in that order. However, if we select blue, green, red, red, blue, we still get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble.
To correct your attempt, we must multiply by the number of orders in which we could get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble. Choose two of the five positions for the blue marbles and two of the remaining three positions for the green marbles. The only green marble must go in the remaining position. Then we obtain
$$binom52binom32binom11left(frac411right)left(frac310right)left(frac59right)left(frac48right)left(frac27right) = frac2077$$
Since we do not care about the order in which the marbles are selected, it is simpler to calculate the probability of selecting two of the four red marbles, two of the five blue marbles, and one of the two green marbles when we select five of the eleven marbles, which yields
$$fracdbinom42dbinom52dbinom21dbinom115 = frac2077$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
"So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?"
Using the logic in the first question you actually calculate the event that "the first chosen student is a girl, the second is a girl and the third is a girl". This is exactly the same event as "all $3$ students chosen will be a girl".
Using the logic in the second situation you similarly calculate the event that "the first chosen marble is red, the second is red, the third is blue, the fourth is blue and the fifth is green". This is definitely not the same event as "$2$ chosen marbles are red, $2$ are blue and $1$ is green".
If that event occurs then it is not excluded that e.g. the first chosen marble is green (hence not red).
You can make use of the method, but then must not forget that the answer found at first hand must be multiplied by the number of orders that are possible.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The first situation with the students is simpler than the second situation with the marbles because we are interested in only one kind of studens (namely girls). So we don't have to deal with different kinds of students.
This gives the simpler answer for the students-question, which doesn' work for the marbles-question.
We can apply the more general logic from the marbles-question to the students question and get as answer:
(6C3) / (10C3) = (6 * 5 * 4) / (10 * 9 * 8)
which is equal to the simpler formula you gave.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
so do you mean that the first logic is only applicable when there are only 2 different types and it isn't applicable when there are more than 2? I mean, why exactly is it not applicable for the 2nd situation?
$endgroup$
– Lucky
yesterday
$begingroup$
also, if you are able to write the first answer in terms of the second answer then surely it should be possible to write the 2nd answer in terms of the first answer as well? what are your thoughts on that?
$endgroup$
– Lucky
yesterday
$begingroup$
@Lucky it's not about number of all options to choose from (genders/colours/whatever). It's about number of options that we want to get. As already explained in drhab's answer if you want to draw just one kind of elements (regardless how many kinds are there in the pool) there is no difference between ordered and unordered results
$endgroup$
– Ister
15 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The first question solved in the second method looks as follows:
$$frac6choose 310choose 3=frac6cdot 5cdot 410cdot 9cdot 8$$
Interpretation: There are $6choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ girls out of $6$ and there are $10choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ students out of $10$, hence the probability is the ratio of number of favorable outcomes to the total number of possible outcomes.
Now compare it with the answer of the second problem and try to interpret the selections.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3177997%2fbasic-combinations-logic-doubt-in-probability%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
What you calculated is the probability of selecting two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble in that order. However, if we select blue, green, red, red, blue, we still get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble.
To correct your attempt, we must multiply by the number of orders in which we could get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble. Choose two of the five positions for the blue marbles and two of the remaining three positions for the green marbles. The only green marble must go in the remaining position. Then we obtain
$$binom52binom32binom11left(frac411right)left(frac310right)left(frac59right)left(frac48right)left(frac27right) = frac2077$$
Since we do not care about the order in which the marbles are selected, it is simpler to calculate the probability of selecting two of the four red marbles, two of the five blue marbles, and one of the two green marbles when we select five of the eleven marbles, which yields
$$fracdbinom42dbinom52dbinom21dbinom115 = frac2077$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What you calculated is the probability of selecting two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble in that order. However, if we select blue, green, red, red, blue, we still get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble.
To correct your attempt, we must multiply by the number of orders in which we could get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble. Choose two of the five positions for the blue marbles and two of the remaining three positions for the green marbles. The only green marble must go in the remaining position. Then we obtain
$$binom52binom32binom11left(frac411right)left(frac310right)left(frac59right)left(frac48right)left(frac27right) = frac2077$$
Since we do not care about the order in which the marbles are selected, it is simpler to calculate the probability of selecting two of the four red marbles, two of the five blue marbles, and one of the two green marbles when we select five of the eleven marbles, which yields
$$fracdbinom42dbinom52dbinom21dbinom115 = frac2077$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What you calculated is the probability of selecting two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble in that order. However, if we select blue, green, red, red, blue, we still get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble.
To correct your attempt, we must multiply by the number of orders in which we could get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble. Choose two of the five positions for the blue marbles and two of the remaining three positions for the green marbles. The only green marble must go in the remaining position. Then we obtain
$$binom52binom32binom11left(frac411right)left(frac310right)left(frac59right)left(frac48right)left(frac27right) = frac2077$$
Since we do not care about the order in which the marbles are selected, it is simpler to calculate the probability of selecting two of the four red marbles, two of the five blue marbles, and one of the two green marbles when we select five of the eleven marbles, which yields
$$fracdbinom42dbinom52dbinom21dbinom115 = frac2077$$
$endgroup$
What you calculated is the probability of selecting two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble in that order. However, if we select blue, green, red, red, blue, we still get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble.
To correct your attempt, we must multiply by the number of orders in which we could get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble. Choose two of the five positions for the blue marbles and two of the remaining three positions for the green marbles. The only green marble must go in the remaining position. Then we obtain
$$binom52binom32binom11left(frac411right)left(frac310right)left(frac59right)left(frac48right)left(frac27right) = frac2077$$
Since we do not care about the order in which the marbles are selected, it is simpler to calculate the probability of selecting two of the four red marbles, two of the five blue marbles, and one of the two green marbles when we select five of the eleven marbles, which yields
$$fracdbinom42dbinom52dbinom21dbinom115 = frac2077$$
answered yesterday
N. F. TaussigN. F. Taussig
45.1k103358
45.1k103358
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
"So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?"
Using the logic in the first question you actually calculate the event that "the first chosen student is a girl, the second is a girl and the third is a girl". This is exactly the same event as "all $3$ students chosen will be a girl".
Using the logic in the second situation you similarly calculate the event that "the first chosen marble is red, the second is red, the third is blue, the fourth is blue and the fifth is green". This is definitely not the same event as "$2$ chosen marbles are red, $2$ are blue and $1$ is green".
If that event occurs then it is not excluded that e.g. the first chosen marble is green (hence not red).
You can make use of the method, but then must not forget that the answer found at first hand must be multiplied by the number of orders that are possible.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
"So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?"
Using the logic in the first question you actually calculate the event that "the first chosen student is a girl, the second is a girl and the third is a girl". This is exactly the same event as "all $3$ students chosen will be a girl".
Using the logic in the second situation you similarly calculate the event that "the first chosen marble is red, the second is red, the third is blue, the fourth is blue and the fifth is green". This is definitely not the same event as "$2$ chosen marbles are red, $2$ are blue and $1$ is green".
If that event occurs then it is not excluded that e.g. the first chosen marble is green (hence not red).
You can make use of the method, but then must not forget that the answer found at first hand must be multiplied by the number of orders that are possible.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
"So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?"
Using the logic in the first question you actually calculate the event that "the first chosen student is a girl, the second is a girl and the third is a girl". This is exactly the same event as "all $3$ students chosen will be a girl".
Using the logic in the second situation you similarly calculate the event that "the first chosen marble is red, the second is red, the third is blue, the fourth is blue and the fifth is green". This is definitely not the same event as "$2$ chosen marbles are red, $2$ are blue and $1$ is green".
If that event occurs then it is not excluded that e.g. the first chosen marble is green (hence not red).
You can make use of the method, but then must not forget that the answer found at first hand must be multiplied by the number of orders that are possible.
$endgroup$
"So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?"
Using the logic in the first question you actually calculate the event that "the first chosen student is a girl, the second is a girl and the third is a girl". This is exactly the same event as "all $3$ students chosen will be a girl".
Using the logic in the second situation you similarly calculate the event that "the first chosen marble is red, the second is red, the third is blue, the fourth is blue and the fifth is green". This is definitely not the same event as "$2$ chosen marbles are red, $2$ are blue and $1$ is green".
If that event occurs then it is not excluded that e.g. the first chosen marble is green (hence not red).
You can make use of the method, but then must not forget that the answer found at first hand must be multiplied by the number of orders that are possible.
edited yesterday
Jacob Jones
14311
14311
answered yesterday
drhabdrhab
104k545136
104k545136
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The first situation with the students is simpler than the second situation with the marbles because we are interested in only one kind of studens (namely girls). So we don't have to deal with different kinds of students.
This gives the simpler answer for the students-question, which doesn' work for the marbles-question.
We can apply the more general logic from the marbles-question to the students question and get as answer:
(6C3) / (10C3) = (6 * 5 * 4) / (10 * 9 * 8)
which is equal to the simpler formula you gave.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
so do you mean that the first logic is only applicable when there are only 2 different types and it isn't applicable when there are more than 2? I mean, why exactly is it not applicable for the 2nd situation?
$endgroup$
– Lucky
yesterday
$begingroup$
also, if you are able to write the first answer in terms of the second answer then surely it should be possible to write the 2nd answer in terms of the first answer as well? what are your thoughts on that?
$endgroup$
– Lucky
yesterday
$begingroup$
@Lucky it's not about number of all options to choose from (genders/colours/whatever). It's about number of options that we want to get. As already explained in drhab's answer if you want to draw just one kind of elements (regardless how many kinds are there in the pool) there is no difference between ordered and unordered results
$endgroup$
– Ister
15 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The first situation with the students is simpler than the second situation with the marbles because we are interested in only one kind of studens (namely girls). So we don't have to deal with different kinds of students.
This gives the simpler answer for the students-question, which doesn' work for the marbles-question.
We can apply the more general logic from the marbles-question to the students question and get as answer:
(6C3) / (10C3) = (6 * 5 * 4) / (10 * 9 * 8)
which is equal to the simpler formula you gave.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
so do you mean that the first logic is only applicable when there are only 2 different types and it isn't applicable when there are more than 2? I mean, why exactly is it not applicable for the 2nd situation?
$endgroup$
– Lucky
yesterday
$begingroup$
also, if you are able to write the first answer in terms of the second answer then surely it should be possible to write the 2nd answer in terms of the first answer as well? what are your thoughts on that?
$endgroup$
– Lucky
yesterday
$begingroup$
@Lucky it's not about number of all options to choose from (genders/colours/whatever). It's about number of options that we want to get. As already explained in drhab's answer if you want to draw just one kind of elements (regardless how many kinds are there in the pool) there is no difference between ordered and unordered results
$endgroup$
– Ister
15 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The first situation with the students is simpler than the second situation with the marbles because we are interested in only one kind of studens (namely girls). So we don't have to deal with different kinds of students.
This gives the simpler answer for the students-question, which doesn' work for the marbles-question.
We can apply the more general logic from the marbles-question to the students question and get as answer:
(6C3) / (10C3) = (6 * 5 * 4) / (10 * 9 * 8)
which is equal to the simpler formula you gave.
$endgroup$
The first situation with the students is simpler than the second situation with the marbles because we are interested in only one kind of studens (namely girls). So we don't have to deal with different kinds of students.
This gives the simpler answer for the students-question, which doesn' work for the marbles-question.
We can apply the more general logic from the marbles-question to the students question and get as answer:
(6C3) / (10C3) = (6 * 5 * 4) / (10 * 9 * 8)
which is equal to the simpler formula you gave.
answered yesterday
jflippjflipp
3,7511711
3,7511711
$begingroup$
so do you mean that the first logic is only applicable when there are only 2 different types and it isn't applicable when there are more than 2? I mean, why exactly is it not applicable for the 2nd situation?
$endgroup$
– Lucky
yesterday
$begingroup$
also, if you are able to write the first answer in terms of the second answer then surely it should be possible to write the 2nd answer in terms of the first answer as well? what are your thoughts on that?
$endgroup$
– Lucky
yesterday
$begingroup$
@Lucky it's not about number of all options to choose from (genders/colours/whatever). It's about number of options that we want to get. As already explained in drhab's answer if you want to draw just one kind of elements (regardless how many kinds are there in the pool) there is no difference between ordered and unordered results
$endgroup$
– Ister
15 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
so do you mean that the first logic is only applicable when there are only 2 different types and it isn't applicable when there are more than 2? I mean, why exactly is it not applicable for the 2nd situation?
$endgroup$
– Lucky
yesterday
$begingroup$
also, if you are able to write the first answer in terms of the second answer then surely it should be possible to write the 2nd answer in terms of the first answer as well? what are your thoughts on that?
$endgroup$
– Lucky
yesterday
$begingroup$
@Lucky it's not about number of all options to choose from (genders/colours/whatever). It's about number of options that we want to get. As already explained in drhab's answer if you want to draw just one kind of elements (regardless how many kinds are there in the pool) there is no difference between ordered and unordered results
$endgroup$
– Ister
15 hours ago
$begingroup$
so do you mean that the first logic is only applicable when there are only 2 different types and it isn't applicable when there are more than 2? I mean, why exactly is it not applicable for the 2nd situation?
$endgroup$
– Lucky
yesterday
$begingroup$
so do you mean that the first logic is only applicable when there are only 2 different types and it isn't applicable when there are more than 2? I mean, why exactly is it not applicable for the 2nd situation?
$endgroup$
– Lucky
yesterday
$begingroup$
also, if you are able to write the first answer in terms of the second answer then surely it should be possible to write the 2nd answer in terms of the first answer as well? what are your thoughts on that?
$endgroup$
– Lucky
yesterday
$begingroup$
also, if you are able to write the first answer in terms of the second answer then surely it should be possible to write the 2nd answer in terms of the first answer as well? what are your thoughts on that?
$endgroup$
– Lucky
yesterday
$begingroup$
@Lucky it's not about number of all options to choose from (genders/colours/whatever). It's about number of options that we want to get. As already explained in drhab's answer if you want to draw just one kind of elements (regardless how many kinds are there in the pool) there is no difference between ordered and unordered results
$endgroup$
– Ister
15 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Lucky it's not about number of all options to choose from (genders/colours/whatever). It's about number of options that we want to get. As already explained in drhab's answer if you want to draw just one kind of elements (regardless how many kinds are there in the pool) there is no difference between ordered and unordered results
$endgroup$
– Ister
15 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The first question solved in the second method looks as follows:
$$frac6choose 310choose 3=frac6cdot 5cdot 410cdot 9cdot 8$$
Interpretation: There are $6choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ girls out of $6$ and there are $10choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ students out of $10$, hence the probability is the ratio of number of favorable outcomes to the total number of possible outcomes.
Now compare it with the answer of the second problem and try to interpret the selections.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The first question solved in the second method looks as follows:
$$frac6choose 310choose 3=frac6cdot 5cdot 410cdot 9cdot 8$$
Interpretation: There are $6choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ girls out of $6$ and there are $10choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ students out of $10$, hence the probability is the ratio of number of favorable outcomes to the total number of possible outcomes.
Now compare it with the answer of the second problem and try to interpret the selections.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The first question solved in the second method looks as follows:
$$frac6choose 310choose 3=frac6cdot 5cdot 410cdot 9cdot 8$$
Interpretation: There are $6choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ girls out of $6$ and there are $10choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ students out of $10$, hence the probability is the ratio of number of favorable outcomes to the total number of possible outcomes.
Now compare it with the answer of the second problem and try to interpret the selections.
$endgroup$
The first question solved in the second method looks as follows:
$$frac6choose 310choose 3=frac6cdot 5cdot 410cdot 9cdot 8$$
Interpretation: There are $6choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ girls out of $6$ and there are $10choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ students out of $10$, hence the probability is the ratio of number of favorable outcomes to the total number of possible outcomes.
Now compare it with the answer of the second problem and try to interpret the selections.
answered yesterday
farruhotafarruhota
21.9k2842
21.9k2842
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3177997%2fbasic-combinations-logic-doubt-in-probability%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Is the drawing with/without replacement in both cases?
$endgroup$
– NoChance
yesterday
$begingroup$
@NoChance: without replacement for both cases.
$endgroup$
– Lucky
yesterday