Basic combinations logic doubt in probabilityProbability of picking three marbles in ordergetting an outcome x number of attemptsProbability of a certain outcomeProbability of drawing colored MarblesProbability with changing number of marblesExpected number o f draws with replacement to reach probability.Probability that the first marble was blue, given the second is blueGiven a bag of 3 red marbles, 5 black, and 8 green, what is the probability that?A bag contains contains 20 blue marbles, 20 green marbles, and 20 red marblesMarble probability without replacement question

New order #4: World

Copycat chess is back

What happens when a metallic dragon and a chromatic dragon mate?

Sort in WP_Query(), not filter? Is it possible?

Does the average primeness of natural numbers tend to zero?

Is there a familial term for apples and pears?

Are objects structures and/or vice versa?

What does "enim et" mean?

Is there a way to make member function NOT callable from constructor?

Is this food a bread or a loaf?

Some basic questions on halt and move in Turing machines

extract characters between two commas?

What is the meaning of "of trouble" in the following sentence?

Why does this relative pronoun not take the case of the noun it is referring to?

What do the Banks children have against barley water?

Why was the "bread communication" in the arena of Catching Fire left out in the movie?

When blogging recipes, how can I support both readers who want the narrative/journey and ones who want the printer-friendly recipe?

Is domain driven design an anti-SQL pattern?

Information to fellow intern about hiring?

Is "plugging out" electronic devices an American expression?

Manga about a female worker who got dragged into another world together with this high school girl and she was just told she's not needed anymore

Calculate Levenshtein distance between two strings in Python

Could Giant Ground Sloths have been a Good Pack Animal for the Ancient Mayans

How did the USSR manage to innovate in an environment characterized by government censorship and high bureaucracy?



Basic combinations logic doubt in probability


Probability of picking three marbles in ordergetting an outcome x number of attemptsProbability of a certain outcomeProbability of drawing colored MarblesProbability with changing number of marblesExpected number o f draws with replacement to reach probability.Probability that the first marble was blue, given the second is blueGiven a bag of 3 red marbles, 5 black, and 8 green, what is the probability that?A bag contains contains 20 blue marbles, 20 green marbles, and 20 red marblesMarble probability without replacement question













3












$begingroup$



"If $3$ students are chosen at random from a class with $6$ girls and $4$ boys, what is the probability that all $3$ students chosen will be girls?"



$left(dfrac610right)left(dfrac59right)left(dfrac48right)$




So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?



"A bag holds $4$ red marbles, $5$ blue marbles, and $2$ green marbles. If $5$ marbles are selected one after another without replacement, what is the probability of drawing $2$ red marbles, $2$ blue marbles, and $1$ green marble?"



My answer: $left(dfrac411right)left(dfrac310right)left(dfrac59right)left(dfrac48right)left(dfrac27right)$



But the correct answer is $dfrac(_4C_2) cdot (_5C_2) cdot (_2C_1)_11C_5$ (where $C$ is a combination).



Why doesn't the logic from the first problem work here?



The draws are without replacement in all cases.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Is the drawing with/without replacement in both cases?
    $endgroup$
    – NoChance
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    @NoChance: without replacement for both cases.
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    yesterday
















3












$begingroup$



"If $3$ students are chosen at random from a class with $6$ girls and $4$ boys, what is the probability that all $3$ students chosen will be girls?"



$left(dfrac610right)left(dfrac59right)left(dfrac48right)$




So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?



"A bag holds $4$ red marbles, $5$ blue marbles, and $2$ green marbles. If $5$ marbles are selected one after another without replacement, what is the probability of drawing $2$ red marbles, $2$ blue marbles, and $1$ green marble?"



My answer: $left(dfrac411right)left(dfrac310right)left(dfrac59right)left(dfrac48right)left(dfrac27right)$



But the correct answer is $dfrac(_4C_2) cdot (_5C_2) cdot (_2C_1)_11C_5$ (where $C$ is a combination).



Why doesn't the logic from the first problem work here?



The draws are without replacement in all cases.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Is the drawing with/without replacement in both cases?
    $endgroup$
    – NoChance
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    @NoChance: without replacement for both cases.
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    yesterday














3












3








3


2



$begingroup$



"If $3$ students are chosen at random from a class with $6$ girls and $4$ boys, what is the probability that all $3$ students chosen will be girls?"



$left(dfrac610right)left(dfrac59right)left(dfrac48right)$




So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?



"A bag holds $4$ red marbles, $5$ blue marbles, and $2$ green marbles. If $5$ marbles are selected one after another without replacement, what is the probability of drawing $2$ red marbles, $2$ blue marbles, and $1$ green marble?"



My answer: $left(dfrac411right)left(dfrac310right)left(dfrac59right)left(dfrac48right)left(dfrac27right)$



But the correct answer is $dfrac(_4C_2) cdot (_5C_2) cdot (_2C_1)_11C_5$ (where $C$ is a combination).



Why doesn't the logic from the first problem work here?



The draws are without replacement in all cases.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





"If $3$ students are chosen at random from a class with $6$ girls and $4$ boys, what is the probability that all $3$ students chosen will be girls?"



$left(dfrac610right)left(dfrac59right)left(dfrac48right)$




So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?



"A bag holds $4$ red marbles, $5$ blue marbles, and $2$ green marbles. If $5$ marbles are selected one after another without replacement, what is the probability of drawing $2$ red marbles, $2$ blue marbles, and $1$ green marble?"



My answer: $left(dfrac411right)left(dfrac310right)left(dfrac59right)left(dfrac48right)left(dfrac27right)$



But the correct answer is $dfrac(_4C_2) cdot (_5C_2) cdot (_2C_1)_11C_5$ (where $C$ is a combination).



Why doesn't the logic from the first problem work here?



The draws are without replacement in all cases.







probability combinatorics permutations combinations






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited yesterday









Bladewood

337213




337213










asked yesterday









LuckyLucky

294




294











  • $begingroup$
    Is the drawing with/without replacement in both cases?
    $endgroup$
    – NoChance
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    @NoChance: without replacement for both cases.
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    yesterday

















  • $begingroup$
    Is the drawing with/without replacement in both cases?
    $endgroup$
    – NoChance
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    @NoChance: without replacement for both cases.
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    yesterday
















$begingroup$
Is the drawing with/without replacement in both cases?
$endgroup$
– NoChance
yesterday




$begingroup$
Is the drawing with/without replacement in both cases?
$endgroup$
– NoChance
yesterday












$begingroup$
@NoChance: without replacement for both cases.
$endgroup$
– Lucky
yesterday





$begingroup$
@NoChance: without replacement for both cases.
$endgroup$
– Lucky
yesterday











4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















7












$begingroup$

What you calculated is the probability of selecting two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble in that order. However, if we select blue, green, red, red, blue, we still get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble.



To correct your attempt, we must multiply by the number of orders in which we could get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble. Choose two of the five positions for the blue marbles and two of the remaining three positions for the green marbles. The only green marble must go in the remaining position. Then we obtain
$$binom52binom32binom11left(frac411right)left(frac310right)left(frac59right)left(frac48right)left(frac27right) = frac2077$$



Since we do not care about the order in which the marbles are selected, it is simpler to calculate the probability of selecting two of the four red marbles, two of the five blue marbles, and one of the two green marbles when we select five of the eleven marbles, which yields
$$fracdbinom42dbinom52dbinom21dbinom115 = frac2077$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    5












    $begingroup$


    "So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?"




    Using the logic in the first question you actually calculate the event that "the first chosen student is a girl, the second is a girl and the third is a girl". This is exactly the same event as "all $3$ students chosen will be a girl".



    Using the logic in the second situation you similarly calculate the event that "the first chosen marble is red, the second is red, the third is blue, the fourth is blue and the fifth is green". This is definitely not the same event as "$2$ chosen marbles are red, $2$ are blue and $1$ is green".



    If that event occurs then it is not excluded that e.g. the first chosen marble is green (hence not red).



    You can make use of the method, but then must not forget that the answer found at first hand must be multiplied by the number of orders that are possible.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$




















      0












      $begingroup$

      The first situation with the students is simpler than the second situation with the marbles because we are interested in only one kind of studens (namely girls). So we don't have to deal with different kinds of students.



      This gives the simpler answer for the students-question, which doesn' work for the marbles-question.



      We can apply the more general logic from the marbles-question to the students question and get as answer:



      (6C3) / (10C3) = (6 * 5 * 4) / (10 * 9 * 8)



      which is equal to the simpler formula you gave.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$












      • $begingroup$
        so do you mean that the first logic is only applicable when there are only 2 different types and it isn't applicable when there are more than 2? I mean, why exactly is it not applicable for the 2nd situation?
        $endgroup$
        – Lucky
        yesterday











      • $begingroup$
        also, if you are able to write the first answer in terms of the second answer then surely it should be possible to write the 2nd answer in terms of the first answer as well? what are your thoughts on that?
        $endgroup$
        – Lucky
        yesterday










      • $begingroup$
        @Lucky it's not about number of all options to choose from (genders/colours/whatever). It's about number of options that we want to get. As already explained in drhab's answer if you want to draw just one kind of elements (regardless how many kinds are there in the pool) there is no difference between ordered and unordered results
        $endgroup$
        – Ister
        15 hours ago


















      0












      $begingroup$

      The first question solved in the second method looks as follows:
      $$frac6choose 310choose 3=frac6cdot 5cdot 410cdot 9cdot 8$$
      Interpretation: There are $6choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ girls out of $6$ and there are $10choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ students out of $10$, hence the probability is the ratio of number of favorable outcomes to the total number of possible outcomes.



      Now compare it with the answer of the second problem and try to interpret the selections.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$













        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        );
        );
        , "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader:
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        ,
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );













        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3177997%2fbasic-combinations-logic-doubt-in-probability%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        7












        $begingroup$

        What you calculated is the probability of selecting two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble in that order. However, if we select blue, green, red, red, blue, we still get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble.



        To correct your attempt, we must multiply by the number of orders in which we could get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble. Choose two of the five positions for the blue marbles and two of the remaining three positions for the green marbles. The only green marble must go in the remaining position. Then we obtain
        $$binom52binom32binom11left(frac411right)left(frac310right)left(frac59right)left(frac48right)left(frac27right) = frac2077$$



        Since we do not care about the order in which the marbles are selected, it is simpler to calculate the probability of selecting two of the four red marbles, two of the five blue marbles, and one of the two green marbles when we select five of the eleven marbles, which yields
        $$fracdbinom42dbinom52dbinom21dbinom115 = frac2077$$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$

















          7












          $begingroup$

          What you calculated is the probability of selecting two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble in that order. However, if we select blue, green, red, red, blue, we still get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble.



          To correct your attempt, we must multiply by the number of orders in which we could get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble. Choose two of the five positions for the blue marbles and two of the remaining three positions for the green marbles. The only green marble must go in the remaining position. Then we obtain
          $$binom52binom32binom11left(frac411right)left(frac310right)left(frac59right)left(frac48right)left(frac27right) = frac2077$$



          Since we do not care about the order in which the marbles are selected, it is simpler to calculate the probability of selecting two of the four red marbles, two of the five blue marbles, and one of the two green marbles when we select five of the eleven marbles, which yields
          $$fracdbinom42dbinom52dbinom21dbinom115 = frac2077$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$















            7












            7








            7





            $begingroup$

            What you calculated is the probability of selecting two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble in that order. However, if we select blue, green, red, red, blue, we still get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble.



            To correct your attempt, we must multiply by the number of orders in which we could get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble. Choose two of the five positions for the blue marbles and two of the remaining three positions for the green marbles. The only green marble must go in the remaining position. Then we obtain
            $$binom52binom32binom11left(frac411right)left(frac310right)left(frac59right)left(frac48right)left(frac27right) = frac2077$$



            Since we do not care about the order in which the marbles are selected, it is simpler to calculate the probability of selecting two of the four red marbles, two of the five blue marbles, and one of the two green marbles when we select five of the eleven marbles, which yields
            $$fracdbinom42dbinom52dbinom21dbinom115 = frac2077$$






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            What you calculated is the probability of selecting two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble in that order. However, if we select blue, green, red, red, blue, we still get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble.



            To correct your attempt, we must multiply by the number of orders in which we could get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble. Choose two of the five positions for the blue marbles and two of the remaining three positions for the green marbles. The only green marble must go in the remaining position. Then we obtain
            $$binom52binom32binom11left(frac411right)left(frac310right)left(frac59right)left(frac48right)left(frac27right) = frac2077$$



            Since we do not care about the order in which the marbles are selected, it is simpler to calculate the probability of selecting two of the four red marbles, two of the five blue marbles, and one of the two green marbles when we select five of the eleven marbles, which yields
            $$fracdbinom42dbinom52dbinom21dbinom115 = frac2077$$







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered yesterday









            N. F. TaussigN. F. Taussig

            45.1k103358




            45.1k103358





















                5












                $begingroup$


                "So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?"




                Using the logic in the first question you actually calculate the event that "the first chosen student is a girl, the second is a girl and the third is a girl". This is exactly the same event as "all $3$ students chosen will be a girl".



                Using the logic in the second situation you similarly calculate the event that "the first chosen marble is red, the second is red, the third is blue, the fourth is blue and the fifth is green". This is definitely not the same event as "$2$ chosen marbles are red, $2$ are blue and $1$ is green".



                If that event occurs then it is not excluded that e.g. the first chosen marble is green (hence not red).



                You can make use of the method, but then must not forget that the answer found at first hand must be multiplied by the number of orders that are possible.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$

















                  5












                  $begingroup$


                  "So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?"




                  Using the logic in the first question you actually calculate the event that "the first chosen student is a girl, the second is a girl and the third is a girl". This is exactly the same event as "all $3$ students chosen will be a girl".



                  Using the logic in the second situation you similarly calculate the event that "the first chosen marble is red, the second is red, the third is blue, the fourth is blue and the fifth is green". This is definitely not the same event as "$2$ chosen marbles are red, $2$ are blue and $1$ is green".



                  If that event occurs then it is not excluded that e.g. the first chosen marble is green (hence not red).



                  You can make use of the method, but then must not forget that the answer found at first hand must be multiplied by the number of orders that are possible.






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$















                    5












                    5








                    5





                    $begingroup$


                    "So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?"




                    Using the logic in the first question you actually calculate the event that "the first chosen student is a girl, the second is a girl and the third is a girl". This is exactly the same event as "all $3$ students chosen will be a girl".



                    Using the logic in the second situation you similarly calculate the event that "the first chosen marble is red, the second is red, the third is blue, the fourth is blue and the fifth is green". This is definitely not the same event as "$2$ chosen marbles are red, $2$ are blue and $1$ is green".



                    If that event occurs then it is not excluded that e.g. the first chosen marble is green (hence not red).



                    You can make use of the method, but then must not forget that the answer found at first hand must be multiplied by the number of orders that are possible.






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$




                    "So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?"




                    Using the logic in the first question you actually calculate the event that "the first chosen student is a girl, the second is a girl and the third is a girl". This is exactly the same event as "all $3$ students chosen will be a girl".



                    Using the logic in the second situation you similarly calculate the event that "the first chosen marble is red, the second is red, the third is blue, the fourth is blue and the fifth is green". This is definitely not the same event as "$2$ chosen marbles are red, $2$ are blue and $1$ is green".



                    If that event occurs then it is not excluded that e.g. the first chosen marble is green (hence not red).



                    You can make use of the method, but then must not forget that the answer found at first hand must be multiplied by the number of orders that are possible.







                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    edited yesterday









                    Jacob Jones

                    14311




                    14311










                    answered yesterday









                    drhabdrhab

                    104k545136




                    104k545136





















                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        The first situation with the students is simpler than the second situation with the marbles because we are interested in only one kind of studens (namely girls). So we don't have to deal with different kinds of students.



                        This gives the simpler answer for the students-question, which doesn' work for the marbles-question.



                        We can apply the more general logic from the marbles-question to the students question and get as answer:



                        (6C3) / (10C3) = (6 * 5 * 4) / (10 * 9 * 8)



                        which is equal to the simpler formula you gave.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$












                        • $begingroup$
                          so do you mean that the first logic is only applicable when there are only 2 different types and it isn't applicable when there are more than 2? I mean, why exactly is it not applicable for the 2nd situation?
                          $endgroup$
                          – Lucky
                          yesterday











                        • $begingroup$
                          also, if you are able to write the first answer in terms of the second answer then surely it should be possible to write the 2nd answer in terms of the first answer as well? what are your thoughts on that?
                          $endgroup$
                          – Lucky
                          yesterday










                        • $begingroup$
                          @Lucky it's not about number of all options to choose from (genders/colours/whatever). It's about number of options that we want to get. As already explained in drhab's answer if you want to draw just one kind of elements (regardless how many kinds are there in the pool) there is no difference between ordered and unordered results
                          $endgroup$
                          – Ister
                          15 hours ago















                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        The first situation with the students is simpler than the second situation with the marbles because we are interested in only one kind of studens (namely girls). So we don't have to deal with different kinds of students.



                        This gives the simpler answer for the students-question, which doesn' work for the marbles-question.



                        We can apply the more general logic from the marbles-question to the students question and get as answer:



                        (6C3) / (10C3) = (6 * 5 * 4) / (10 * 9 * 8)



                        which is equal to the simpler formula you gave.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$












                        • $begingroup$
                          so do you mean that the first logic is only applicable when there are only 2 different types and it isn't applicable when there are more than 2? I mean, why exactly is it not applicable for the 2nd situation?
                          $endgroup$
                          – Lucky
                          yesterday











                        • $begingroup$
                          also, if you are able to write the first answer in terms of the second answer then surely it should be possible to write the 2nd answer in terms of the first answer as well? what are your thoughts on that?
                          $endgroup$
                          – Lucky
                          yesterday










                        • $begingroup$
                          @Lucky it's not about number of all options to choose from (genders/colours/whatever). It's about number of options that we want to get. As already explained in drhab's answer if you want to draw just one kind of elements (regardless how many kinds are there in the pool) there is no difference between ordered and unordered results
                          $endgroup$
                          – Ister
                          15 hours ago













                        0












                        0








                        0





                        $begingroup$

                        The first situation with the students is simpler than the second situation with the marbles because we are interested in only one kind of studens (namely girls). So we don't have to deal with different kinds of students.



                        This gives the simpler answer for the students-question, which doesn' work for the marbles-question.



                        We can apply the more general logic from the marbles-question to the students question and get as answer:



                        (6C3) / (10C3) = (6 * 5 * 4) / (10 * 9 * 8)



                        which is equal to the simpler formula you gave.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$



                        The first situation with the students is simpler than the second situation with the marbles because we are interested in only one kind of studens (namely girls). So we don't have to deal with different kinds of students.



                        This gives the simpler answer for the students-question, which doesn' work for the marbles-question.



                        We can apply the more general logic from the marbles-question to the students question and get as answer:



                        (6C3) / (10C3) = (6 * 5 * 4) / (10 * 9 * 8)



                        which is equal to the simpler formula you gave.







                        share|cite|improve this answer












                        share|cite|improve this answer



                        share|cite|improve this answer










                        answered yesterday









                        jflippjflipp

                        3,7511711




                        3,7511711











                        • $begingroup$
                          so do you mean that the first logic is only applicable when there are only 2 different types and it isn't applicable when there are more than 2? I mean, why exactly is it not applicable for the 2nd situation?
                          $endgroup$
                          – Lucky
                          yesterday











                        • $begingroup$
                          also, if you are able to write the first answer in terms of the second answer then surely it should be possible to write the 2nd answer in terms of the first answer as well? what are your thoughts on that?
                          $endgroup$
                          – Lucky
                          yesterday










                        • $begingroup$
                          @Lucky it's not about number of all options to choose from (genders/colours/whatever). It's about number of options that we want to get. As already explained in drhab's answer if you want to draw just one kind of elements (regardless how many kinds are there in the pool) there is no difference between ordered and unordered results
                          $endgroup$
                          – Ister
                          15 hours ago
















                        • $begingroup$
                          so do you mean that the first logic is only applicable when there are only 2 different types and it isn't applicable when there are more than 2? I mean, why exactly is it not applicable for the 2nd situation?
                          $endgroup$
                          – Lucky
                          yesterday











                        • $begingroup$
                          also, if you are able to write the first answer in terms of the second answer then surely it should be possible to write the 2nd answer in terms of the first answer as well? what are your thoughts on that?
                          $endgroup$
                          – Lucky
                          yesterday










                        • $begingroup$
                          @Lucky it's not about number of all options to choose from (genders/colours/whatever). It's about number of options that we want to get. As already explained in drhab's answer if you want to draw just one kind of elements (regardless how many kinds are there in the pool) there is no difference between ordered and unordered results
                          $endgroup$
                          – Ister
                          15 hours ago















                        $begingroup$
                        so do you mean that the first logic is only applicable when there are only 2 different types and it isn't applicable when there are more than 2? I mean, why exactly is it not applicable for the 2nd situation?
                        $endgroup$
                        – Lucky
                        yesterday





                        $begingroup$
                        so do you mean that the first logic is only applicable when there are only 2 different types and it isn't applicable when there are more than 2? I mean, why exactly is it not applicable for the 2nd situation?
                        $endgroup$
                        – Lucky
                        yesterday













                        $begingroup$
                        also, if you are able to write the first answer in terms of the second answer then surely it should be possible to write the 2nd answer in terms of the first answer as well? what are your thoughts on that?
                        $endgroup$
                        – Lucky
                        yesterday




                        $begingroup$
                        also, if you are able to write the first answer in terms of the second answer then surely it should be possible to write the 2nd answer in terms of the first answer as well? what are your thoughts on that?
                        $endgroup$
                        – Lucky
                        yesterday












                        $begingroup$
                        @Lucky it's not about number of all options to choose from (genders/colours/whatever). It's about number of options that we want to get. As already explained in drhab's answer if you want to draw just one kind of elements (regardless how many kinds are there in the pool) there is no difference between ordered and unordered results
                        $endgroup$
                        – Ister
                        15 hours ago




                        $begingroup$
                        @Lucky it's not about number of all options to choose from (genders/colours/whatever). It's about number of options that we want to get. As already explained in drhab's answer if you want to draw just one kind of elements (regardless how many kinds are there in the pool) there is no difference between ordered and unordered results
                        $endgroup$
                        – Ister
                        15 hours ago











                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        The first question solved in the second method looks as follows:
                        $$frac6choose 310choose 3=frac6cdot 5cdot 410cdot 9cdot 8$$
                        Interpretation: There are $6choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ girls out of $6$ and there are $10choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ students out of $10$, hence the probability is the ratio of number of favorable outcomes to the total number of possible outcomes.



                        Now compare it with the answer of the second problem and try to interpret the selections.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$

















                          0












                          $begingroup$

                          The first question solved in the second method looks as follows:
                          $$frac6choose 310choose 3=frac6cdot 5cdot 410cdot 9cdot 8$$
                          Interpretation: There are $6choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ girls out of $6$ and there are $10choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ students out of $10$, hence the probability is the ratio of number of favorable outcomes to the total number of possible outcomes.



                          Now compare it with the answer of the second problem and try to interpret the selections.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$















                            0












                            0








                            0





                            $begingroup$

                            The first question solved in the second method looks as follows:
                            $$frac6choose 310choose 3=frac6cdot 5cdot 410cdot 9cdot 8$$
                            Interpretation: There are $6choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ girls out of $6$ and there are $10choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ students out of $10$, hence the probability is the ratio of number of favorable outcomes to the total number of possible outcomes.



                            Now compare it with the answer of the second problem and try to interpret the selections.






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            The first question solved in the second method looks as follows:
                            $$frac6choose 310choose 3=frac6cdot 5cdot 410cdot 9cdot 8$$
                            Interpretation: There are $6choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ girls out of $6$ and there are $10choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ students out of $10$, hence the probability is the ratio of number of favorable outcomes to the total number of possible outcomes.



                            Now compare it with the answer of the second problem and try to interpret the selections.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered yesterday









                            farruhotafarruhota

                            21.9k2842




                            21.9k2842



























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded
















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3177997%2fbasic-combinations-logic-doubt-in-probability%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Category:Fedor von Bock Media in category "Fedor von Bock"Navigation menuUpload mediaISNI: 0000 0000 5511 3417VIAF ID: 24712551GND ID: 119294796Library of Congress authority ID: n96068363BnF ID: 12534305fSUDOC authorities ID: 034604189Open Library ID: OL338253ANKCR AUT ID: jn19990000869National Library of Israel ID: 000514068National Thesaurus for Author Names ID: 341574317ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

                                Reverse int within the 32-bit signed integer range: [−2^31, 2^31 − 1]Combining two 32-bit integers into one 64-bit integerDetermine if an int is within rangeLossy packing 32 bit integer to 16 bitComputing the square root of a 64-bit integerKeeping integer addition within boundsSafe multiplication of two 64-bit signed integersLeetcode 10: Regular Expression MatchingSigned integer-to-ascii x86_64 assembler macroReverse the digits of an Integer“Add two numbers given in reverse order from a linked list”

                                Kiel Indholdsfortegnelse Historie | Transport og færgeforbindelser | Sejlsport og anden sport | Kultur | Kendte personer fra Kiel | Noter | Litteratur | Eksterne henvisninger | Navigationsmenuwww.kiel.de54°19′31″N 10°8′26″Ø / 54.32528°N 10.14056°Ø / 54.32528; 10.14056Oberbürgermeister Dr. Ulf Kämpferwww.statistik-nord.deDen danske Stats StatistikKiels hjemmesiderrrWorldCat312794080n790547494030481-4